Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES OCTOBER 21, 2004~~~'~~~ C1TY Q~ --- U n ~~~~ PL.INNING ~~ND LOVING AT1Nl "I'T S ~s>~ ,~' ~~~I1:r.I~a~s I=~n~uer c~,vl~~Nrrr October 21, 2004 ~~~~~~ Attending: Winston Dyer -Chairman, Mary Haley, Jerry Hastings, Ted Hill, Joeeph Laird, Stephen McGary, Randall Porter, Bob Schwartz, David Stein, Stuart Wells Others attending: Kurt Hibbert -Director Community Development, Cathy Winters -Secretary, Rex Erickson -City Council, Stephen Zollinger -City Attorney Chairman Dyer opened the meeting at 7:05 pm. Welcoming the members of the board and guests of the county. - 1. Minutes: September 16 and October.07, 2004 meeting. Joseph Laird made the 1 sc moti°" to approve the minutes with corrections. Stuart Wells made the 2"d motion. Motion Carries /Correction Made 2. Tabled requests: None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: None 4. New Business: Final Plat Mill Hollow SubDivision #2 - Permit# 04 00078 -Robert Sipherd Kurt Hibbert made the presentation for the owners of the property showing the final plat and the location on the city map. Group Discussion: Property deeded for the right of way. Defiencies in the final plat. (Secretary had the incorrect copy of the plat given to board and on display) On the Final Plat a heavy line, outlining the upper portion of the lots is required. Joseph Laird made the lst motion to approve the plat with the following changes: 1. Setback requirements are required on the Final Plat that is to be recorded. 2. Right of way should be corrected on the Final Plat on Lot 7. 3. Section 3.5 addresses open space. (Is this correct?) Steven McGary made the 2°d motion Motion Carries • Brent Whiting: Chimes Apts. Discussion Kurt Hibbert opened discussion on the Chimes Apartment parking. Mr. Whiting has requested from his E neighbor to the east to lease enough ground for 8 parking spaces, the neighbor has agreed. One block away he has requested the lease of 7 additional parking spaces. 1 Group Discussion: The property is dormitory style houseing, nothing has been grandfathered, it has not always been a dorm. The issue at hand is the parking situation. Setting a presidence is a concern of the • Commission along with not enough green space. Comparisions were made to other small and large apartments that do not have enough parking space. This is the only owner of the Chimes Apartments that has attempted to comply with our ordinances. Enforcement of parking, possible use of shuttle service and the distance of 200' might be workable, but a block away is too far. Concern about the crowded street is another issue. Snow storage is a concern. Stephen Zollinger: Stated that the parking issues are before the Council and Mayor they are thinking of having parking within the contract between apartments and tenants that they must have and use assigned parking spaces. Mary Hailey: We have been waiting for a number of these homes in this area to come into compliance or for the city to make them to come into compliance or remove them from those houses. Jerry Hastings: I believe based on what Mr. Zollinger has told us really our discussion needs to be put on hold until the City Council comes up with a solution. I believe the applicant should be informed as to what is coming through, have him put this on hold until the City Council has adopted some type of parking ordinance that will address this issue and we review this at a later date. It is not in his best interest for us to proceed on the off site parking issue. Kurt Hibbert: Will the Commission be ameanable to processing the 8 stalls he is proposing. t-• Chairman Dyer: I think the concensus of the Commission is that they have no interest in this proposal other than what you had already done to invite them to come in with a conditional use permit that has already been issued. Are you saying they can expand that? A conditional use permit up to 8 stalls. Kurt Hibbert: This would be a legal conforming situation, for dormitory houseing. Two stalls for managers and 6 stalls for students. Chairman Dyer: The Commission would be interested in pursueing further discussion on the off site parking issue when and if there is furthur direction from the City Council on the possibility of changing that ordinance. Sunshine Generation of Rexburg -Dance Studio Kurt Hibbert: This issue is the Home Occupation issue, in Chapter 9, page 63 of our zoning ordinance. Child Care Centers may have as many a 6 children at any one time, additional children require a conditional use Permit under Chapter 6.13.F.2. We have had a proliferation of dance studios or little girls attending classes where they want to have 10-12 students, this is a case where they want to have more than 6. Chapter 9.16 is very specific on family child care center but it does not preclude a Conditional Use Permit being sought. The question to the Commission tonight is whether the Dance Studio can have more than 6 students if they come before you and apply for a conditional use permit. • 2 Chairman Dyer: Mr. Erickson has this issue come up before the City Council? Our ordinance addresses day care centers and not specifically dance studios. Has this issue been addressed at the Council? Councilman Erickson: It has not. How is it addressed as a home occupaion? Kurt Hibbert: Home occupations are very diverse here in the city. We have even received an application for chipping rocks. I was concerned about this, but it was repairing rock chips in windshields. Councilman Erickson: I'm questing parking in this situation, I think parking will be a problem in this issue. Chairman Dyer: Is there any discussion and input from the Commission? Group Discussion: Conern about parking and offstreet parking Chapter 4.10.7 required off street parking. Chairman Dyer: We have a general concenne to turn down this proposal. 5. Non-controversial Items Added to the Agenda: None 6. City Council actions on P&Z recommendations: Annexation - 3rd of Nov. Round About - 4-1 are against but after construction that reverses (see handouts) Comp Plan Text -Talked about formal amendment process, would like residence that has concerns to submit specific request for amendment changes. They should be in written form and can be made on an ongoing basis. The City Council would like to have the text adopted by 2nd meeting in November and we can still make corrections and amendments on an on-going basis. ProZone -Discussion on that, several people did not understand that the first three pages are the framework so I color coded copies (see handouts) the black ink is the ordinance, the dark blue ink is examples of things that have been done specific to certain areas; they are not specific to Rexburg. We will write for specific project or areas. 7. Zoning Compliance: Kurt Hibbert -Strategic Plan Strategic Plan - I am working with city of Nampa and Ada County on Code Enforcement. We have written a plan Code Enforcement Strategic Plan, this is a lesson plan to teach our residence about what our expectations are, sets up processes to help do that. The Council was very pleased. Bill Hamlin will be in charge of enforcement, he is doing this on a part time basis and starting with apartments zoning. Please review and comment. This is the framework to approach. We have started looking into some of the past complaints. List of Complaints • Abatement 3 Nellie's Place Shirley's Woodshop he is taking down signs and transitioning to a shop f ~ 8. Unfinished/Old Business: A. Zoning Ordinance Annexation Policy Overlay District Chariman Dyer: Opens by reminding the Commissioners that they will discussing the first 3 pages of the overlay district. Mr. Sparhawk would like to have input at a point in this discussion, we will see where that fits. Kurt Hibbert: This sets up a public involvement process, it legislates and will becomes part of ordinance and becomes code. It requires public hearing, public involvement, negoitation and opens up an opportunity to create a project or zone that we don't currently have in our ordinance. Chairman Dyer: Let's speak to this one issue first, there was good discussion last meeting both by Planning and Zoning and interested citizens. If not carefully applied it could, on face value, look like zone busting type of document. Kurt Hibbert: Zone busting will not be considered, because of the approvals of the Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council approval, and the residence themselves will be involved. It is a legislated !; ~ full blown public process. I would expect that we will receive petitions from the residence themselves; they would be petitioning the zones. Chairman Dyer: Asked the Commissioners for input on the three pages to be considered for creating the mechanism that would then potentially lead to the creation of these districts. Group Discussion: The process is a very deliberate and schemetic process. Requires neighborhood meetings before it goes before Planning and Zoning. The residence will have to take ownership. Problems were discussed using 2"d E as an example of the type of situations that might arise. This allows oposing parties to come to a common ground. Another example is a developer has a broad vision and wants to take 40 acres and develop different types of things from high end homes in one area to high density homes and less expensive homes in an area with a little commercial. He wants neighborhood involvement and would like to bring this in an entire package. A single individual or a group of individuals are allowed to present a project. Another example was the Devon Hughes project he is proposing and is working with his neighbors to accomplish this project. He is trying to plan comprehensively for the entire neighborhood. Chairman Dyer: Concerned about people giving pretty pictures that we approve, then they go do something else. This will give us new and stronger opportunitities that what we see is what we get. Chairman Dyer: Mr. Sparhawk, the chair will ask you to come forward. As you do the Chair will give some introductory remarks that I want in the record, Madame Secretary. Mr. Sparhawk has been 4 following this proposal with keen interest from the beginning, he does represent and is serving as President of a neighborhood association. He has taken the time to go to other cities where this has been implemented to learn a bit more about it and have a chance to report on that before the Commission all of which qualifiy him to have a spot in front of us. At the same time, we want the record to show, this will go through due public process, hearing, deliberation, and adoption or rejection however it may be and we want to be careful no one individual or group are afforded a larger opportunity to parcipate in the decision making process than another. It is a very fine line that we walk, want the input, but we do not want any undue influence. With that understanding between Mr. Sparhawk and myself as Chairman, we have invited him to make a shot presentation tonight. Don Sparhawk: I apprecite it, most of what I have to present is more research than opinion. I would like to add some background as to what this Project Redeveopment is and where it came from. I will pass out copies of my research Don's research -See Copies handed out at meeting When this was adopted the homeowners were in favor and the developers against. The homeowners felt they would have more control over how the apartment complexes were designed and how large they were. Strictly for your information I have handouts so you can understand where this came from. Chairman Dyer: Thank you. Mr. Sparhawk the Commission would welcome constructive input from your group, about how to craft something to resolve the conflict that we are experiencing. We are ready to receive that. Don Sparhawk: We are not opposed to doing something along 2"d E, we are not sure that this covers the whole community, all the residential areas. Chairman Dyer: We understand we are looking more for constructive suggestions that criticsm. David Stein: Do you really think that was offensive, I did not. Chairman Dyer: My personal opinion is that everybody wants to take shots at what we are trying to do to solve problems. Taking shots is fine, it is Truth, Justice and the American way. What we need are positive proactive proposals that this commission could consider and move forward with. Don Sparhawk: I can give you this, if you would limit this to a certain area and not let it apply to the entire community. If you want to do it along 2"d E do it along 2"d E and Collage Ave. I don't think the residence of the City are going to want this to apply to their LDR1 or LDR Zones. David Stein: Mr. Chairman, I didn't take it as critism, I thought there were certain suggestions as to how to address it. We should take it into consideration. Don Sparhawk: I was not trying to critize I was trying to help you. Chairman Dyer: It seems like we have a big problem to solve and we try to be creative and get out of the box and are really making some progress. It seems like every one is saying you can't do that, you can't do that. That is where I'm coming from. 5 Kurt Hibbert: On your research, you stated the homeowners, gave them more protection. .~ The developers didn't like it? Don Sparhawk: If you read through the newspaper articles you will see that it was really designed to help protect the older neighborhoods of Provo. It might be something you might really want to look at for Rexburg. We have the same issues on a smaller scale. Chairman Dyer: Other comments? Mary Hastings: I'm rather interested in history so I am not taking offence at this whatsoever. Mr. Hibbert presented what he has to us as an example of the ordinance. I like to know the background of how things come about so I'm not taking offense here at all. Stuart Wells: This is good information, my question is have we limited or found a way to limit it so everyone won't apply for it city wide. So can one person come in and request a zone change so he can put a business in his house. Kurt Hibbert: The power in this is that if it doesn't fit it doesn't get approved. It has to go through such a rigiourous process; if it doesn't fit, it doesn't go. Group Discussion: Pros and Cons were discussed and agreed upon as the best mechanism that allows input and approval from residence, Planning & Zoning and the City Council. ~~ Kurt Hibbert: The new Zoning Ordinance is due by November 17th. The ProZone will be included in the new ordinance. The ProZone will be in rewrites and will have to go to public hearing. I asked council today, council suggested they could have a joint hearing but since most of this has been reviewed by the Board you can recommend that it go to City Council for Public Hearing. Stephen Zollinger: The document that is to go to City Council in 2-4 weeks with a few changes. The intention is to go to Public Hearing with the City Council. Design Standards -Building under 25,000 sq. ft. Chairman Dyer: Requested that Mr. Hibbert lead the discussion. Concern about some of developers that are breaking up to smaller developments well under 25,000 sq feet. These are not required to meet the design standards we now have in place. There is a development that is 90,000 sq feet and half of it has been broken down into smaller units underneath this threshold. Chairman Dyer: Is that in an effort to side step our ordinance or what are we seeing here? Kurt Hibbert: I can't make that judgement here. There are two levels of commercial developments that are not touched by Design Stanards. Structures in the Highway Business Zone that are less than 25,000 sq. feet the other is strutured in the Central Business District Structures, which have O lot line and are a . different animal completely. The thought 6 months ago was to wait until our Downtown consultant 6 completed his project that is drawing to a close, I think there is one more meeting. Most commercial development is happening in the Highway Business District. Group Discussion: Confusion about the intent of Ordinance #907 several members of the board thought that the ordiance included smaller buildings around the corridor of the development. Some thought the Ordinance was aimed at Big Box developments. The requirement for a project should tie the buildings together. Commercial shopping centers have a certain design standards that they should meet; challanging the franchises to offer different types of buildings for Rexburg. Eyes to the street have to be considered. Economically square boxes don't draw a customer base. World Gym and Platt electric were used as an example of development without design standards as both are under 25,000 sq. feet. Both of these are incomplete at this time and we hope they have a better look than they do now. McDonald's in Sedona, Arizona was used as an example of different type of designs for franchises. It was noted that we have to be very carefull, National Chains normally have their own designs. We don't want to get bogged down with standards and we do not want to deter these operations from coming into Rexburg. It was suggested that with design standards we can upgrade the look of our community. Alcohal by the drink is one the problems that the franchises don't want to consider this location. Stephen Zollinger: The ordinance as it is now written would require 25,000 sq feet and up buildings to comply, but none of the stand alone business would have to comply. The ordinance would cover structures such as Walmart, the common wall structures are treated as a single structure. This would not include single structures on the property, it is the single enity, the common wall structure that this ordinance addresses. Chairman Dyer: Requested that Kurt Hibbert put together design standards for under 25,000 square feet in a separate document and bring it back to Planning and Zoning for discussion. Chairman Dyer: Asked for volunteers for this project. Randall Porter, David Stein and Steve McGary volunteered. Lighting Ordinance Kurt Hibbert: Randall Porter has done a lot of research, information and ordinances have been passed out for your review. There are a lot of details to be considered regarding lighting. I wanted to get this on the agenda again. If you would review this and circle what you like we can come back for review. Randall Porter: These ordinances address issues concerning the "save of the nighttime sky" address commercial light and light trespassing along with the reduction of glair or driving into bright lights. I read somewhere if you drive out to the desert and view the nighttime sky you can see 100 million stars, in a typical city that number is reduced to a few 1,000 starts. I think it is a good thing for a city to have and I think our city is primed for it. There is so much building going on. One of the first things the Temple Committee asked Kurt was does your city have lighting requirements. Chairman Dyer: Noticed there are a lot of technical specifications. Do we have or can we find someone in the community to come in and speak to use about this? 7 Kurt Hibbert: Intermountain lighting gave a presentation to the Mayor a few weeks ago and was very informative. Chairman Dyer: Asked if we can schedule them to meet with us at the November 4 meeting. Jerry Hastings: We have to be willing to take this to the tariff levels, if we put restrictions in, it can become very costly. Chairman Dyer: Asked the Commissioners to pick 3 philosophies that you would like to see in the area of Rexburg we can then start putting together an ordinance. Please review the model ordinance and see how it can fit into our plan. Kurt Hibbert: We wouldn't have to have a separate ordinance; we can add lighting requirements for each zone. B. Comprehensive Plan C. Tri Meeting -Agenda November 4, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers Agenda Items Report on Projects: See Attached Report Mary Haley:. Stated a few of her concerns: Digital signs are offensive to her, recommends Cellular Towers covered with artificial trees. Parking downtown after hours. by the Pro Mark Research Corp. on the corner does not leave parking for City meetings. Randall Porter: Expressed concern on Main St. and Highway 20 interchange about a gravel pit operation. Adjournment: 10:40 THE ABOVE SCHEDULED TIMES REPRESENT A BEST EFFORT AT SCHEDULING. IT MAY BE NECESSARY FROM TIME TO TIME TO ADJUST THESE TIMES TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES. Notice: Please contact City Hall three days prior to any city meeting if there is any special assistance needed for disabled people planning to attend the meeting. • 8 APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CITY OF REXBURG APPLICANT: Name FQe?J7- Address 1404 W • 16n o S - City _State . U7— OWNER: (Complete if owner hot applicant) Name Address City State PROPERTY COVERED BY PERMIT: Address Z3 EAS— Z '�� �e)077./ Legal Description (Lot, Block, Addition, Division Number) phone go/ -¢W- Sy& Phone zone M 1) 2 ilei 11 __U uc1 4 2DO4 D 0IT1" ()F-Rf}(BURG NATURE OF RE' QUEST:,Briefly explain the proposed use: ea H - svoenrr 4nu%_ .,va TO i4 Yc>o..jG Mme -7u- __WC /n t O&oy - iL) -5 $F`!.... PA-4kltI6 2,-5001QEM(�j�/]S __3_V CEl'i 5lAw Aigi onilu 242K•1_ Ak. eQ±f• A;, Me. ''bFvorJ Ccocs 014.0 OLJn/S X i?4{LId.I1/6 f oT LoeWrr-D j Rc.ocV-, -M T(fr %Joa; 1rW OF O()P- PR aP6-)LTY Ont TWE_ COPD 2 OF l S Mog7w- AwP Cie 66-411e. Existing use of property DUP ane" �S Cezise As2a�,nvr) Will this have an impact on schools: tQ D Formal notice will be sent to applicant ager approval of a Conditional Use Permit Notice will state the conditions of the permit. If conditions are violated or not met there will be a 90 day period to cure the problem. Failure to comply with the terms may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit REQUIRE MINTS FOR GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERWI L The following information will assist the Commission and/or City Council to determine if your proposal will meet the requirements under the zoning ordinance.. 1. What is the estimated water usage per month? Are the existing mains adequate to provide ftre protection? Aku c> sn- E G1 ��, Cay m U Ut -n+� Sam-� 2. What is the estimated sewer usage per month? Will pretreatment be necessary? & J'n tux TV4 $A -Mt: 3_ What is the estimated daily traffic to be generated? Will the traffic be primarily private vehicles or commercial trucks? Pk 1 VA -ff , CoNTI wUE SA -e -W 4. If commercial, industrial, or a home occupation, what Will be the hours of operation?—WA 5. Will storm water drainage be retained on site? Is an existing storax drain available? Is it at capacity? If so, will new facilities be constructed? 6. Ifproposed use is residential, describe number and type of dwelling units. Will this be student housing! multi -family for young families, singles and couples, or elderly? UNtI-5 n� S;WDnvT�,xsiiV6 - WA -L 1* YouNcp.A*/ 7. What provision has been made for fire protection? Where is the nearest fire hydrant? Is any point of the building further than 150 feet from access sufficient in width for fire fighting equipment? S. How much parking is being provided on-site? Do the aisle widths and access points comply with the ordinance requirements? Has landscaping been provided in accordance with the OIdinance? ( PARL-Ws St2� Ofd S,Tt- - SC "IN WlLt 13EN smgED WTiIE DTrir- = Cv"e)4- PA-Aen✓6 sPoVis. 'Mir-Nc s no73 Jut, [?g- A-✓Aq"te IN A /Vm- Loi WE -WILL C&,A/SirCUGT XgY7- - A -hi A00y77WAL 7-SFDrS WILL'gE e-pst-n R?oM ?4' Lo T' owNeD BY DevoN M•aff61110, i CoLLeTe fest AG�eEFrvre�vr.. Ave. 9.. Where will solid waste generated be stored? Is access adequate for the City coIection? �OIJ Nub A s rj)P owr- VGY'LV LVVI IV Ivl lvl 11 V V V L V 10. What is the type of noise that will be generated by the use? What are the hours of noise generation? NIA - 11, What type of equipment will be used in the conduct of the business? 12. What are the surrounding land uses? Has buffering been provided as required by the ordinance? 80 Vs rN C S SM61C P;%M 7Cy H0s.6-j jJf 13_ Are any air quality permits required? Is dirt or other dust creating materials moved by open trucks or box cars? N 0 14. Will the parking lots or other outdoor areas have lighting? 1JVA 15. Are passenger loading zones for such uses as daycare centers and schools provided? How is busing routed? For commercial uses, where are the loading docks? Is there sufficient space fat truck parlc;ne? N/A - 16. If a commercial, multi -family, or public assembly use, where is the nearest collector street? Arterial street? ? 17. What, if any, signage is anticipated in connection with the proposed usage? The Commission or Councilmay address other points than those discussed above, but a narrative addressing at least those applicable points will assist in processing your application.. ATTACH A PLOT PLAN AS REQUESTED BY SECTION 6-9, 1� - 4Le�- 1-3o-(9 Signature of Applicant Date un. _ u,Ju�aa.yan.v� FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Fee: Date Paid Paid By: Check Cash Other Date of Notice: Hearing_P$Z Council THIS AGR V61ENT, made and entered into this, 2004 by and between the Devon Hughes hereinafter r#'ared to as "Icssoe,am R"gLwhitufe ,hereinafter referred toss`Ltssa Lesser does hereby agree to grant, demise and lot, and lessee does hereby agree to take the property to be used as parking spades locakd on the comer of 14,South and College Avenue, Rexburg, Idaho, beginning upon approval from Rexburg City and continuing until 31 December 2005. Thereafter, the rent shall continue month to month, until either patty shall terminate the same by giving the other party 30 days written notice. Lessor agrees to make available up to eight parking spaces to Lusa. Lessee agAect to pay $10 per month per parking Space. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Lessee has the right to sublet dte parking spaces to his tenmts and also bas the right to assign the lease to a third party- Lessee shall send written notice of assignments to Lessor, including name, address and phont: numbtr of Assignee, prior to assignments being transferred. Third parties shall maintain the conditlons ofthis lease. If the third party violates One conditions of the baso, Lessor shall give Written hotic0 of deflcleneics to leased or assigner. If eorrec0ons are not made within 30days, this tease shall be null and void. INDEhINIFICATION' Lessor shall not be liable for any damage "injury to Losec, "any other petsen, or to any property, "curring on the pianists, or any part thereof; or in common areas thaeog and Lcssoo agrees to hold Lesser harmless from any clams Or damages no mannan bow caused - IN WITNESS WHMOA, the parties hecto sign their names. -' Lessor � L�� U)'.- „' w (h Y o �. .� w J ¢' ry OI qI W ❑ O� O J. a- W Q_ U (D CL OI i`J m O7I S. V fj7 N -J J 7- } O O O o OJJ J J J t U) a U S S J. J J J J J d d d 2 2-.� 7� 71 7 3 T9! ,7th Ni :1 72' Q.a..ae•aaue..�xm ¢ rne0xhh�e� 7A eJ .Q A 9 2 a W 7 R APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CITY OF REXBURG APPLICANT: Name &V - s UX Address 4(O(IZ o%. .`'S IQ . City QLX buita State OWNER: (Complete i owner not applicant) Name rQX CLO— Address_._l(Q(e is rC-3 City %una State PROPERTY COVEPHp BY PppERAIIT: II,, Address `�(0(Q o1 3G. Legal Description (Lot, Block, Addition, Division Number) Phone 234 qo Phone 8 a q, 4 d Zone NATURE OF REQUEST: Briefly explain the proposed use: t lllndd WWI Y04fyX4- . 4-h 6j---j-o--0C( N -1 /A I/JQJ ����u5,w fLh Existing use of property: 4bItm Will this have an impact on schools: (10 Formal notice will be sent to applicant after approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Notice will state the conditions of the permit. If conditions are violated or not met there will be a 90 day period to cure the problem. Failure to comply with the terms may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit (0: REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: The following information will assist the Commission and/or City Council to determine if your proposal will meet the requirements under the zoning ordinance. 1. What is the estimated water usage per, ,month? Are the existing mains adequate to provide fire protection? vlk4 wvta-0 /na-l� /d L.. A Al ! n . . A A/l. 117'n 1-. a7n 1 -./in X2�atis the e�stimaoted�=ewer�pernth? Will pretreatment be necessary? /J�' 3. What is the estimated daily traffic to be generated? Will the traffic be primarily private vehicles or commercial trucks? I 10±0. yt 12.111 �Q9 – �- ClatB�w i 4. If commercial, industrial, or a home occupation, what will be the hours of operation? 0""JZU40 5. Will storm water drainage be retained on site? Is an existing storm drain available? Is it at capacity? If so, will new facilities be` constructed? ,n 10- 6. 0- 6. If proposed use is residential, describe number and type of dwelling units. Will this be student housing: multi -family for young families, singles and couples, or elderly? di L, -moo 110I em -� Qw- 14 d I ll�Q ll9.xtCA„ U U " I-1 U 7. What provision has been made for fire protection? Where is the nearest fire hydrant? Is any point of the building further than 150 feet from access sufficient in width for fire fighting equipment? - %.%aA o . Ln i1JVl. Gal fl," SIJL `E O i l� 8. How much parking is being provided on-site? Do the aisle widths and access points comply with the, ordinance requirements? Has landscaping been provided in accordance with then ordinance?__IOM – L ,tL"fJ>tRi 9. Where will solid waste generated be stored? Is access adequate for the City collection?_ VA r0 10. What is the type of noise that will be generated b the use? What are the hours of noise generation?n 0-110 -1-, e 14C Q l9tA Q L��,f��.. 11. What type of equipment will be used in e conduct of the business? &6U id_ U — 1 v, l `� 12. What are the surrounding land uses? Has buffering been provided as required by the ordinance?, . / (3 13. Are any air quality permits required? Is dirt or other dust creating materials moved by open trucks or box cars? V\ I n 14. Will the parking lots or other outdoor areas have lighting? 15. Are passenger loading zones for such uses as daycare centers and schools provided? How is busing routed? For commercial uses, where are the loading docks? Is there sufficient space for truck parking? �lyn Y`Octc�_ 0 !/YUP_ o.O4b , U. 16. If a commercial, multi -family, or public assembly use, where is the nearest collector street? Arterial street? V) /n 17. What, if any, signage is anticipated in connection with the proposed usage? Yl The Commission or Council may address other points than those discussed above, but a narrative addressing at least those applicable.points will assist in processing your application. ATTACH A PLOT PLAN AS REQUESTED BY SECTION 6-9. Signature of Applicant Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Fee: Date Paid: Paid By: Check Cash Other Date of Notice: Hearing:. P&Z Council CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROCEDURES The City of Rexburg Zoning Ordinance designates certain land uses in each Zoning District which are allowed. These are listed in the Zoning Ordinance for each zone. The City Clerk or City engineer should be consulted if you have questions about whether your proposal will need a Conditional Use Permit. If a C.U.P. is needed, you will need to get an application from the City. Clerk and fill it out for a C.U.P. You will then need to return the application and request that the City Clerk put you on the Planning Commission agenda one week prior to the meeting. The Planning & Zoning Meetings are held on the 2"d and 4' Wednesday of every month at 7:00 p.m. The City Clerk will then mail to the Planning Commission the application for them to review prior to the meeting. At the meeting the board will discuss your request with you and set it for Public Hearing. You will need to pay $200.00 to the City Clerk prior to any advertising for the hearing. Prior to granting a conditional use, at least one Public Hearing shall be held to give persons an opportunity to be heard. The City Clerk will put the notice for the hearing in the paper 15 days prior to each hearing, mail a copy to all the property owners within 300 feet and post a notice on the property. After the Planning Board holds their hearing they will make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will take the Planning Board recommendation into consideration:. If a hearing is required before the City Council they will then take into consideration oral and written testimony as well as the recommendation from the PlanningBoard_ A decision will be made by the City Council within the time frame allowed by Section 67-6511, Idaho Code.