Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES APRIL 25, 2001/~ PLANNING & ZONING April 25, 2001 7:00 p.m. Chairman: Davawn Beattie - Members: __ _ _ ..Ted-Whyte John. Watson Mike Ricks Glenn Walker Winston Dyer City Clerk: Marilyn Hansen P.F.C.: John Millar City Attorney: Stephen Zollinger Glen made a motion to approve the minutes, seconded by Ted. All voted aye, none opposed. Conditional Use Permit for Scott Spaulding for a PRD John Millar presented to the Board the history and facts for the requested Conditional Use Permit which is for the development of a Planned Residential Development. This property is iocated at i520 W. and U. S. Highway 20. The requirements for a PRD is through a Conditional Use Permit. • John Dester was present for questions and reviewed the proposed preliminary site plan and pictures of the proposed development. This development has 83 townhouses, 71ots across the top as a buffer from the Widdison Addition to the townhouses, a clubhouse and an in-door swimming pool. The small townhouses are 1050 square feet, the larger ones are 1270 square feet. Discussion. Ted made a motion to send this Conditional Use Permit request to public hearing, Winston seconded the motion, all voted aye, none opposed. Nick Baldwin Request for Storage Sheds John Millar explained this property is located north of the north water storage reservoir on 7`'' North and east of Leislunan Electric's warehouse and is located in the Impact Zone. When complete this would comprise 140 storage units basically for the use of household storage. The area is zoned HBD, personal storage units are allowed as a conditional use. Discussion on fencing, Fire Department, the units do not require parking but there is a 90% maximum lot coverage requirement. Three items to be considered were the 90% lot coverage, Fire Department review, and the turn lanes. It was requested Mr. Baldwin bring in the written right- of-way agreement for our records. f\ • 1 Mike made a motion to send this request to public hearing, seconded by Ted. All voted aye, • none opposed. Dan Neumann Site Plan Approval John Millar described the property as being located at 163 N. Center, to the West of this property is Twin Pines and Village Gardens is located to the south. This plan has been reviewed internally, there is some. City staff involved in the project and great lengths have-been taken to keep the reviews with other staff members. The property owned by Mayor Sutherland north of this parcel was also included in this zone change, it appears it will be selling as HDR, the potential purchasers are interested in working together with this development sa that flow through traffic can be maintained for better access for fire protection. On utilities the City will be working with both parties to extend the main sewer line along the north side of this property that would serve these two parcels and an unserviceable parcel that EISSA owns to the west. Working these together will ultimately be better for all parties but this particular project complies with the codes and can stand alone. John Watson made a motion to approve the site plan as drawn, seconded by Glenn. All voted aye, none opposed. J~icks College Par king There was some discussion concerning the parking requirements for Ricks College and future plans. • Eddie Pincock Land Split Stephen reviewed the Pincock case which had been before Planning & Zoning previously for a variance to split their home from their apartments, which request had been denied. This request was made for the purpose of facilitating financing. Eddie explained they had tried to purchase some land from the neighbor, but it has been cost prohibitive. Their request is for a conditional use. If Pincocks could lease property from their neighbor to acquire the footage they need to split the property legally title insurance can be obtained on a sale. Stephen explained the conditions that would be necessary which allow these lots to be severed and treated as two separate lots conditioned upon the lease being in existence. On the day that the lease ceases to exist those lots would be, by written agreement, merged into a single lot. No additional structures would be allowed as a result of the lot split, nothing would change in what is physically there, this would simply be facilitating a funding problem. An agreement would be entered and recorded that would run against the property. Discussion concerning matters that maybe the result of this matter resolving itself. `~ • 2 ~' Motion was made by Ted to table this proceeding, seconded by Glenn. All voted aye, none opposed. i• • 3