Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1999~~ DATE: (012799) Planning & Zoning 1~27~99 7:00 P.M. Chairman: Brad Liljenquist Board Members: Ted Whyte Marilyn Hanson Bobbette Carlson Doug Smith John Vdatson Davawn Beattie Gary Steiner Also present: City Clerk: Rose Bagley, Attorney: Stephen Zollinger, Assistant Engineer: Val Christensen, Public Facilities Coordinator: John Millar, Councilmember: Paul Pugmire A motion was made by Ted Whyte and seconded by Bobbette Carlson to approve the minutes of January 13. All Aye Introduction of scouts. RE: AGENDA PROCEEDTJRES TOPIC: (500,148,,,AGENDA,P&Z,ENGINEERING) • Brad explained procedures we would follow from r_ow on all items on the agenda.. (1) Engineering staff from the city will introduce the subject and give a staff review with a brief presentation. They will explain what the issues are with regard to Planning & Zoning and our responsibilities toward the issue. (2) We will hear from the property owner or property owner representative to give their presentation. (3) Then we will have discussion from this board. (4) The way the discussion will work all the questions anal comments wi1.1 need to go through the chairman. RE: SCHOOL DISTRICT C.U.P. APPROVED TOPIC: (500,148,,,C.TJ.P.,SCHOOL DIST.,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,PARKING, BARNEY DAIRY RD) Continuation of the Conditional Use Permit for the School Building. Val Christensen explained, in December the school district applied for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a Sports Building to go in next to the football field. There was discussion about them not having a comprehensive plan of the entire area. Jack Bowman, Recreation Director, got with the School District and came up with some ideas and Val added to them. (copy on file) This is phase 1 and this is just an idea to get the ball rolling. He explained the plan. Part of the area is an old junk yard and is not suitable for any building purposes so Val had filled it up with parking and fields. That would leave the portions that use to have ball diamonds on for possible structures in ~~~~~ -• the future. He put in some different things that may or may not be put in but they are ideas. This gives them some type of a plan to start with. There is a lot of room for other input. Brad asked him if there were any concerns about the proposed building? Val. explained he had drawn the proposed way to put the sewer in. Roger Hampton representing the school district- Iri the last meeting there were some concerns about the parking issue and also how the building would lay out with the remainder of the F>roperty over to the west of the football field. They feel with the help of the city and some other people involved they have addressed those concerns. To get people off Barney Dairy road they have planned to put in a temporary parking lot with some gravel off the road possibly with some no parking signs along the road. They would ask the city council to address the gravel parking lot. (discussicn on the: plan) Mr Hampton told them right now the school lawyer a.nd city attorney are working on a joint agreement for a joint development of the project which will be presented with this plan to the school board at their next meeting. A motion was made by Doug Smith and seconded by Marilyn Hanson to approve a Conditional Use Permit for the school to build this building. All Aye RE: DEAN PETERSON STORAGE UNITS TOPIC: (500,149,,,STORAGE UNITS,GRANDFATHERED,PETERSON*DEAN,1500 W, LANDSCAPED) ' ~ Dean Peterson's Storage Units. Val Christensen explained this was addressed in a meeting in December. At that time it was tabled and he and Stephen were asked to go .look at the feasibility of the grandfathering rule. (Letter was given to board members regarding issue, attached.) What they found is the configuration that was discussed at the last meeting was constructed in a manner that would suggest that it would have a mirror image on the other side and they did .f_ind that. (Val showed a proposal, on file.) The unit that there was a question was unit "R" and unit "C" which was not complete at the time. That is what he and Stephen addressed. As far as the rest of complex was not grandfathered. The units that we questioned being grandfathered was units "R" and "C" and they thought they would be grandfathered, however similar to what he has, they would not be able to get a full width type unit like he '.has in "A". It would have to be a narrower type unit because of the amount of property that is along that side. Dean Peterson- 586 Chad Drive- After the last meeting he felt everything was pretty much okay to go on the first building on the top. The neighbors wanted some landscaping. At that time the board said the bottom one would not be grandfathered. They want to get the top part approved. They need the corners grandfathered so they can build it out so it is square. Val stated that the roof lines ar~~ such that the drainage runs to the front. That would suggest if youu were going to build this shape like unit and not build a mirror back you would put . the high side to the front. He is talking about the=_ grandfathering from what was already there. ~~ ~ Dean said he would get some water for the landscaping. They would put in a gravel road so people won't get stuck. LaRee Warnick- 231 South 1500 West- On behalf of the neighbors they feel okay about them finishing off what is there that has been started They would like it to be landscaped or anything to improve the appearance of the units. They do not feel good about another one going in. They don't want another storage unit out there. They don't have a problem with him finishing what is there. They don't want him adding onto it and they don't want anymore on the street. Boyd Cardon- He wanted to make sure they landscaped and finished it off. Mrs Warnick stated there was a concern that people are getting stuck at the unit and having to have neighbors pull them out. They felt this should be corrected. Stephen explained it is a non allowed use he is seeking to expand. It is sort of a hybrid between grandfathering and conditional use. A motion was made by Davawn Beattie to approve the northern half of this design including units P., B,C,D,E,F,G,H,R with the conditions the northern most units be no more than twenty feet, that landscaping be included on the project, that there be a limitation of 5 years for completion, and that the driveway be gravel to prevent vehicles from getting stuck, and that it be well maintained. Seconded by Doug Smith. All Aye RE: NANCY DAMS REQUEST FOR C.U.P. F'OR A DAYCARE TOPIC: (500,150,,,W. MAIN,DAYCP.RE,PLTBLIC HEARING,DAVIS*NANCY) John Millar explained the application for a Conditional Use Permit for the home located at 507 West Main to put a day care center with a maximum of 50 children at that location. It is currently a residence and the zoning is L.D.R.l. 'Phis is allowed under a Conditional Use Permit under the L.D.R.l Zone. What this board will need to decide is not if it can be put in this home but what conditions can be put upon it. With that number of students the ordinance requires two parking spots for each employee. They have nine parking spaces shown on the drawing. Nancy Davis- Discussed the protect. They will need to put ~.. an external exit from the basement. In the conditions we could designate a one way drive through. A motion was made by Doug Smith and seconded by John Watson to approve the plan with the stipulation that the engineer review it for the recommended parking and recommend it to go to Public Hearing on February 25. All Aye RE: SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REVIEW FOR PROBLEMS TOPIC: (500,150,,,SUBDIVISION,ORDINANCE,SETBACKS,SIDEWALK,LIGHTING) r • Subdivision Ordinance Review for Problems: John Millar went over some problems. • It does not a.dequateiy address the Impact Zone. ~~ ~~~ • It needs a good thorough review. It does not correspond to the cross sections. Parkways & setbacks. Cul de sac frontage. Sidewalk widths. Lighting. Brad asked John to be responsible to do an indeptl~i Engineering study and make recommendations at the meeting in one month. Brad also told the board that he had asked John to spend about one hour at the end of the next four meetings to go over some rules and regulations of Planning & Zoning. Meeting adjourned. • January 26, 1999 • Planning and Zoning Members RE: Recommendations for possible Grandfather Rights at Petersen Storage Uzuts The Planning and Zoning Board asked Val Christensen and Steve Zollinger to research and make recommendations concerning the possible Grandfather Rights associated with the Petersen Storage Facility on 1500 West. At the previous meeting the board discussed the possibility that the design of the existing buildings would suggest that the owner had always planned to finish the buildings with an attached mirrored struct«re. Steve and Val were asked to evaluate the property owner's claim. Ot~r findings and recommendations are listed below: The South side of the complex has had the mirrored portion partially completed. There has been no prior construction on the North side of the complex. The South side should be allowed to be completed to match the existing structure. The distance from the North structure to the fence (assumed property line) is approximately 46 feet. The width of the existing North structure is about 31 feet. If the property owner did indeed plan to construct a new mirrored image structure on the North side of the existing structure, the distance left over for a driveway would be about 15 feet. This would not be anywhere close to the dimension needed to allow for the type of use (parking of recreational • vehicles) of the existing structure. Using parking lot standards the access on the North side of the complex should be at a minimum of 22 feet. Recreational vehicle parking would need much more turning space and therefore would require a wider access and therefore a narrower building. Thus it is our recommendation-that the North units must be enclosed storage units substantially narrower than the existing units. If you have any questions concerning these findings please give me a call at 359-3020 ext. 314. This issue is on the agenda for the January 27t'' meeting. Sincerel Val Christensen Assistant Engineer • • ~`,t r r y, I~ ~ ` I1. ~.: b t "'` ~,~ f ~ r . , p - 1, '~~ ~ ;., ~} MADISON CCOUNTY P.O. BOX 388 RIXBURG, ID~},HO Brad Liljenquist 83~o Dec. 23, 1998 City of Rexburg Planning and Zoning Committee 12 North Center Rexburg Idaho 8340 Dear Brad: It has come to the attention of the .Madison County Commission that there was a proposal to move the sporting complex further to the west, to make room for additional buildings between the balldiamonds and the football stadium. We have also received a copy of an agreement between Willis Walker Estate and Madison School District 321, stating that a parking lot was suppose to be established on the said property to provide adequate parking on the north end of the sports c~:rplex. The Barney Dairy Road is the only East access to Rexburg. It has substantial traffic because of its location, new subdivisions and development, farm to market traffic and it is one of the shortest and most direct routes for some of the farmers to access dealerships for repairs. It was built to county standard (30 years ago)and has not been improved or widened substantially since that time. With the advancement and development of larger equipment for the farm community, access on this very narrow road has become very difficult. With the location of the sports complex next to this east access, there are times in the year when sports enthusiasts are parked in the right of ways This in turn makes it much mare difficult fir large equipment as well as being dangerous for local residents and sports enthusiasts alikel The original agreement with the designation and development of a parking lot to the west and north of the sporting complex would greatly relieve some of the parking pressure and make the Barney Dairy Road safer and more accessible for the farm community as well as the local residents. Respectfully Yours Madison County Commission Gerald Lee Jeppf Reed Sommer Brooke Passey CC Brent Orr,11~ • ~_- ~~ - ^~~ p ~ '" m~~ ~ u ~~~ ~~o~~~ ~ gy z ° N ~ i"Vr~l ~~~~ i ! ~°~~d o a ~~ z~ ~+ ~~ cn ~~ ~ y Tirg Y~` 5 3p~ Y =~ :a l ~~ s€. ~ ~ f TOI ~ ~, y~a ~~ ~ ~! ~r~ p~ ~~~ $ g 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ opt ~ n ~ ~ 'a P m ~ ~ ~ ~o A ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a ~~ "~ ~ F ~y~~ '~~~ 264.00 500'00'6U'W it ¢ I &5.00' I ~I ; - -, I; - ---- 7- -- -- , ;~ I j l 6 S NI ~ i gl ~! ~ ,Ii ~; p ~' ° 1 I ° 'i Im ~~ 1 of I „I ~ ~ 1 I I I ~ ;~ ~~ ~ al ~. ~_La.oaj L_as,oa__. _~spg'_.J l saoo'_ it i _ _ _..- _ ROSEWJ00 ORNE _ ~---9_ CS qS 4R ~~ NOQ60'00'E 22.50' I~ i o ggim y~lro n o n! 1 Im1~ \yJl 1 -'~ -~i o•~ _~~ ~ i g; ~ o a` .~. ~~m o` f ~ - v ,~~~ Rx ~. Ips° ~~ ~ .' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~, i ~ i __ ml ~Oo r __._~_ __.. i ~ i ~ ' I 55 ~~n-I iq 1 I I r ~ :? m { I ~ ~ I I ~ ° 1 I ~ ,l~i~/' I I ~ ! ~ i ! ~ 1 I I ! F it ~~1 3e^ i iI i ~ `~'-'~.. 1 -III o 7 /zs-P L.--------. J I ., i i i r-- ' !/ ~ 1 i : i 9 °r, ~ i ~~/ I I I i i -._-.-_ t---------.~ ~_.~ ~----------. i __ --~-~ r _ - --'--~ 1 i i-~s-ais_ =-~r i 1 F~ r--~-- i I 1 i I I S ., 1 I ii li _ I u II II i i t I I I I I I I I I I i t 1._~a.oo'--_t - - 'b 264.60' N0000' E gg CENfEA LME OF BIRCt/ SfREEf ~._L._~ _~_.-,____-v__- NCO'CO'DClE ~~~~ ~.~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~r~z~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~g~ ~ ~ Im ~ I ^~~ wr _~ N s~ ~ sum - >< ~ ~ oQ~ ~----.111.--.~~~ ~ ~-~~~~ 'q rn ~i~y3 `i ~~ ~ e ~~ 6G6~ ~ ~~m ~~~ 0 ~~Q y ~~~ Y ~ ~3~C ~ 3 i 8zo~ 9~m~~~ ~ m~o~ oS~F- ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ gp~ ~ ~ ~ x x ~ ms ~ ~~~ ~I ~ I ~ - ~~ ~a~=~~ ~a~n~ _~~~~ ~wZ~~ ~ era= ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ 0 ~'~~o n~ymoo ~xy~z°T nSj-Lin'°' ~~n~o n$-~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~~m°s Q ~~ "_ ~ ~m o~ ~~~~ oo s ~ ~ =~Ta ~~° ~~~m x ~~ i~~~~ m °~ ~°~~ ~A ~~ '~_ ~~~~~ a~~~ ~n ~~9~ jT q~~~~ ~mm~ m~~~ ~~m mmmmA ;~ ~~x° A :~ ~ ~ J CO m ~ > O Z ~ O r ~ o m (~ i\ lJ1J W ~ ~ O ' s-`'O< ~ cn m W O --7 ~oo'~ ~~~ ~~ TiJN W~ ~ L C= ~~~~m O ~ x~~- ~ P W _ ~ ~ ~~~q -n p ~ --1 O > G O ' o ~ mot Z ~ ~ -a m ~ no O Z ~~~~~~~ ~°~~~~~4 ~Q~~~~~~ 403~~ g~~~~~m ~~~s~a~ a ~~~a~~~ S ~~ ~o~°~ ~ a ~8 ~~~ ~~~~m ~~$~~~~ ~~~ •