Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES SEPTEMBER 14, 1994~^ ..~~; DATE: (091494) PLANNING & ZONING 9/14/94 7:00 p.m. • Those Present: Chairman: Members: Councilman: City Clerk: Attorney: Engineer: John Millar Jim Long Jerry Jeppesen Mary Ann Mounts Brad Archibald Davawn Beattie Johnny Watson Richard Smith Glen Pond Rose Bagley, excused Steve Zollinger Joe Laird Janet Williamson was present to take minutes. Davawn Beattie moved to approve the minutes of 8/24/94. The motion was seconded by Jim Long. All aye. Mary Ann Mounts moved to approve the minutes of 9/07/94. The motion was seconded by Davawn Beattie. All aye. RE: REVISED SITE PLANS FOR COMFORT INN TOPIC: (300,92,,,COMFORT INN,MAIN STREET,LANDSCAPING,SIDEWALKS, CURB & GUTTERS,TREES) Glen Halverson presented a revision of the site plans for Comfort Inn. John Millar declared a conflict of interests and asked MaryAnn Mounts to chair this issue. Ora Green was at the meeting and said they live out by the Comfort Inn. She wanted to make it clear that when they annexed that area that they would go around her property and not annex her in. Joe said that was the property that was annexed in 1968 and John Millar said that later it was de-annexed. Steve said it was not annexed with the new Comfort Inn annexation. Glen said there have been some changes at the Comfort Inn site since they started construction and he needs to get some feeling from the Planning & Zoning people as to whether they need to do more out there or if it will be acceptable the way they have it planned. Glen explained the new landscaping plan - very complete, detailed landscaping by the Comfort Inn with sprinkler system using City water. Outer area will be landscaped with trees and lesser quality grass that will be watered by the irrigation ditch with a pump installed there. • Davawn asked about the curb and gutter. Glen said that when the client • asked them to draw up a site plan they put in curb and gutter just as a • basic thing that they do. As they got along in construction, they got to thinking that they do not know what will be happening in the future to the surrounding sites, egress etc. so they would like to forget the curb and gutter for now and wait and see what happens. It is not a City street, it is a private drive and they are responsible for it. Jim asked about the drainage and Glen said it is "crowned" to run off to the north. Mary Ann said it was her recollection that when they talked about this before that they did want a sidewalk that went to the building. Glen said that they really didn't feel that there would be a demand for that type of sidewalk unless a family-type restaurant were put in and then they would put in the sidewalk. Jerry disagreed and felt that many people might want to walk downtown from there. A curb creates a safer environment. Jim expressed his feelings that on a project this big that we should have a licensed landscaped architect designing the landscaping not civil engineers. Boise has a landscape design review committee that gives them the right to require specific types of landscaping, exact type of trees, etc. but at this time Rexburg Planning & Zoning has nothing like this. Mary Ann felt they could require sidewalk if we feel it is a safety issue. Richard said that is the issue - can they require it? When • they talked before the discussion was based on terms of making that a requirement contingent upon annexation. That was legal. We all agreed that we hadn't done that before and we weren't going to do it in this situation. Richard asked John if we have the authority to enforce a sidewalk on this project? Speaking as a citizen, John felt they did. Steve said they are going to place a building that is going to be serviced by City accesses, therefore, P. & Z. does have authority to control what types of accesses they are going to have coming to and from that building. Bill Conway was at the meeting and said that he lives directly behind the Comfort Inn. He owns an acre across the back. When they started construction he came in and checked the minutes to the meetings and it says, in those minutes, that there was to be a visual barrier along the south (back) side. This Inn towers over them and looks into their back yard. He strongly feels there needs to be a visual barrier there like the minutes said. Kendall Fuller spoke and said that he lives next to the Conways on the East. The thing that they were most surprised at was how far back and close to their property the Motel was built. Jim moved that they review the minutes of the original meeting and original plan and conform to the original concept that was approved. Johnny Watson seconded the motion. All aye. • Mrs. Green asked if the dirt road they are using will be closed off at the end of the. construction and Glen said that it would. r`~ Glen said that to go back to the original plan that some of those • things may not be necessary. Mary Ann asked why, at the time, it was okay and now they want the change. The most significant reason is the curb and gutter cost about 30-40 thousand dollars and they don't feel it is entirely necessary. The question tonight is is the commission going to require curb and gutter. They need to know tonight because if it is it needs to be put in before the next meeting or they are going to be in to winter and it stops the occupancy permit. Joe read the original minutes. He said the original plans show some type of bushes but no tall trees. Glen said the client is ready to put in taller trees. He can't bring in 30' tall trees but he will plant trees that grow taller. (types of trees discussed) John said the curb and gutter that were shown on the original drawing were at the owners option. There is no City requirement that it be put in. Jim said that we approved the original plan with that. Joe suggested that they needed to decide on the curb and gutter tonight. Sidewalks were discussed originally not curb and gutter. Johnny said that you could have sidewalk but it is not necessary to have curb and gutter. He felt P. & Z. were in error in forcing them to put in curb • and gutter. The curb was never an issue and was never discussed. As far as the zoning ordinance and our responsibility says, you will adequately take care of storm drainage. That is the issue, it is not whether you have a curb or not. Richard moved that they relief the developer of the responsibility of curbing and require sidewalk on the east side of the access road. Jim Long seconded the motion. All aye. Jim moved that they communicate to the developer that he consult with them on landscaping, major trees, etc. in the Spring but that the occupancy permit not be contingent on this. (some discussion and motion was withdrawn} Bill Conway asked that they settle the issue of the trees and visual barrier now. Davawn moved that they go back to the original approval and that the screening be adequate in height to screen the property from the unit its or the property owners. Jerry said that originally when they presented this and said that they were going to screen for the occupants of the motel, it is a 2 story building and to adequately screen for the 2nd story it would have to be trees that would have a height that would screen out these houses. That was the intent that I thought it was presented with and I would say lets go back to the original intent with that clarification. Joe pointed that it • originally says "there will be shrubs on the south side along the canal for a visual block for the guests". l~ • Richard asked Glen if they had any problem putting in some high shade trees. Glen said some visual from the highway is important to him - he wants people to see his motel. John said the ordinance does not require 30' high trees. Davawn reworded his motion to say that the "shrubs" be sufficiently high to screen the two properties. Johnny asked can we require in excess of the ordinance. Richard said that on the south side you have a parking area. There is specific language in the zoning ordinance that authorizes screening of sufficient height to screen the two parcels by that parking area. I would suggest to you that that would go along way to solve these peoples problems. (page 32, section 4.7,A.1&2.) (More discussion} Davawns motion died. Jim wanted to emphasis to the developer that he review the screening definition in the ordinance of what he has to do. Richard moved that along the parking areas of adjoins the abutting property that the develo scrubs and shade trees of a sufficient height adjoining parcels and that this be subject to commission. Johnny seconded the motion. All pg. 32) this development where it der be required to plant and density to screen the review by this aye. (Zoning Ordinance RE: REVISED PLAN FOR THE RICKS COLLEGE RELIGION BUILDING TOPIC: {300,95,,,RICKS COLLEGE,STORM DRAINAGE,SITE PLANS) Johnny Watson presented a revised plan for the Ricks College Religion building. The owner has elected to move the location of the building. The things that are an issue to this group - vehicle access, sidewalk, landscaping, storm water, sanitary drains, etc. have not changed. When he was here before it was for a Conditional Use Permit. That was granted. Parking in regards to this change has 5 more then originally required. The service road is the same, the storm drainage is handled the same, the number of fire hydrants is the same, etc. The only thing that changes is maybe the shape of the building and the esthetics of the building. (Storm drainage discussed.) He felt it was only fair to present the drawing and modifications to this group because it was reviewed before and the Conditional Use was granted and he just wants to make it clear that the college was not going to do something different they just elected to relocate the building. The next thing the College needs to do is come for a final site plan review, submit it to Joe in advance to review, then to P. & Z. It will show all the final calculations. John Millar said he would like to see • the old plans along side the new ones. ~Y RE: DISCUSSION OF FUTURE ARTERIALS TOPIC: {300,96,,,ARTERIALS,RIGEiT OF WAY,MADISON COUNTY) Joe Laird asked the commission to look ahead to planning of the roads in Rexburg.. He had a population growth hand out emphasizing that they only had one chance to establish street rights of way and that should be as early as possible or it becomes so expensive that you do with a lot less at some later date. Joe explained the drawings he had of cross sections of minor and major arterials. Minor 80 Ft. Right of Way --- 4 lanes and a median Arterial: (comparable to 17th street in Idaho Falls} 90 Ft. Right of Way section with the same 70 Ft curb to curb gets 5 Ft. landscaping strip on either side with a 5 Ft. sidewalk (Either 80 or 90 Ft R.O.W. you could get 5 lanes of traffic) Major 115 Ft. Right of Way --- 7 lanes of traffic and Arterial: 5 Ft. landscaping and 5 Ft. sidewalk on either side (Controlled access such as along Sunnyside in I.F.) Discussion of City Map of Arterials (Attached) Red --- is pretty much resolved that the City will be doing that and it will be a major, 115 Ft. arterial with the 7 lanes but it will be staged, starting with 2 lanes and building up to 7. Joe showed two alternatives to traffic flow on the south side of that - one in green and one in purple (blue) The pink and orange lines were two alternatives to a N-S arterial to hook up to Sugar City. Existing arterials are shown in yellow on the map. Basically in urban highway planning, you figure you need controlled access facilities at least every 3 miles. (More explanation of the map.) This would need to be a joint City, County and Sugar City effort. You need to establish the right of way now so you can develop these types of traffic carrying facilities or you are going to be paying millions and millions of dollars buying up everybody's front yard as they continue to build along these streets. If you don't do this type of planning and get some type of development control on the existing roads that says keep the houses back, dedicate the right of way as you develop, you are going to be paying so many millions of dollars there won't be anyway you can afford to do it. Brad asked how you go about doing this. Joe said you need to establish and pass an ordinance that • says this is our future plan for the area - these street right of way widths are required - as you develop your subdivision or as you build • Suggestions regarding the Rexburg Impact Zone Ordinance Sept. 14, 1994 Creation of a new chapter of the Rexburg Zoning Ordinance .dealing specifically with the Impact Zone is proposed. The chapter will address all aspects of the impact zone and will be a part of the Zoning ordinance. As noted below, portions of the existing ordinance will not apply to the new chapter - ` = - regarding the zoning ordinance. The following are suggestions to be used for initial discussion as to the proposed chapter contents: 1. Title, Authority, Purpose, and Intent a. Statement that the chapter is adopted pursuant to I.C. 67-6526 and pursuant to mutual agreement between the city and county. b. Purpose of the impact zone -- define purpose and include language that i purposes include any others consistent with the state statute. c. Intent -- use similair Language as found in the ordinance. 2. Boundary definitions a. Define impact zone boundaries or state that the boundaries of the impact zone are defined by seperate ordinance. b. establish method for amending impact zone boundaries -- see LC. 67- 6526 (d). 3. Zones, Zoning Map, Zoning Tables a. Define and describe the various zones authorized in the impact zone. The zones can be categorized in two specific types: 1. All existing zones listed in section 3. Z of the Rexburg Zoning Ordinance and described is chapter 3 of the ordinance. 'These zones .are hereafter refered to as "Chapter 3 zones" 2. Agriculture 1, Agriculture 2, and Rural Residential -- List the zones • and provide a definition that is consistent with the content of the other zones contained in chapter 3. This may require redrafting the definitions of these zones and incorporating some of the existing provisions in more suitable sections or tables found in the impact zone chapter. b. Establish provisions for a zoning map and provide that the zoning map is made a part of the ordinance. -- c. Establish tables comparable to those contained in chapter 3. -- see handout 1. Provide that all chapter 3 zones located in the impact zone will be subject to the tables contained in chapter 3. 2. Provide that the new zones, namely Agriculture 1, Agriculture 2 and Rural Residential will be subject to the new tables defined and described in this chapter. 4. Applicability of the zoning ordinance in the impact zone. a. Provide that any chapter 3 zone which is located in the impact zone is subject to all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Provide that Agriculture 1, Agriculture 2 and Rural Residential are subject only to the following Zoning Ordinance provisions: 1. Chapter 1 -- Title, Authority, Purpose and Intent 2. Chapter 2 -- Definitions -- Additional definitions which specifically address impact zone matters may be required. 3. Chapter 3 -- Zone definitions 4. Chapter 6 -- Administrative procedures 5. Chapter 7 -- General provisions It is proposed that the following chapters should not apply to the impact zone: 1. Chapter 4 -- Supplementary regulations 2. Chapter 5 -- Parking regulations 3. Chapter 8 -- provisions regarding nonconforming .uses, abandonment, expansions, discontinuance of use, etc. It is recognized that many of the provisions contained in the above chapters should in some way be addressed as they apply to the three zones that are -- -- - - ----- peculiar to the impact zone. However, since many of provisions need to be altered or amended in their application to the three zones, it is proposed that the provisions be addressed seperately in the impact zone chapter. Some specific items that should be addressed are listed in item 5 below. c. Provide that to the extent that provisions of the impact zone chapter conflict with other provisions of the zoning ordinance, the provisions of the impact zone chapter shall govern with respect to Agriculture 1, Agriculture and Rural Residential zones. 5. Specific provisions: a. (4.2) yard space b. (4.3) sale of lots below minimum space requirements -- does this prohibit the sale of property in Ag zones for less than 5 acres without a zone change? c. (4.4) accessory buildings d. (4.5) Access to public streets -- should include language that will protect our major arterials and connectors -- possibly include controlled access language e. (4.6) clear view provisions for corner lots should be included. f. (4.7) .fencing requirements should not apply in the three new zones of the impact zone. -- should they apply in Rural Residential? g. (4.8) parking restrictions should not apply. h. (4.9) exce tions to the set back re uirement should a 1 • p q pp y i. (4.10) Home occupation provisions should be included; however, the existing provisions should be reviewed and possible changed.. j. (4.11) the manufactured homes provisions should apply in Rural Residential zones but should not apply in Agricultural 1 and Agricultural 2. k. (chapter ~) parking regulations should not apply 1. (chapter 8) existing rules regarding nonconforming uses, change of use, expansions and enlargements, abandonment and discontinuance should be redrafted to reflect discussions with various interests during the past months. Some of the issues that should be addressed are: 1. Recognition and indexing of historic herd size for specific cattlemen within the impact zone. An addendum to the ordir~unce should be prepared and refereed to in the ordinance which protects the herd size. 2. Define what constitutes abandonment or discontinuance of a nonconforming use -- length of time -- number of livestock 3. Expansion of cattle operations above a noted percentage should be allowed only by conditional use permit, zone change, variance, etc. 6. Amendments to chapter 6 regarding administrative procedures a. (6.3) Provide that the Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission is authorized by the city and county to administer rules and regulations regarding the impact zone. b. (6.5) membership, appointment -- chapter 6 should be amended to reflect the agreement with the county that it will appoint 2 members to the city planning and zoning commission. -- one member to still be appointed by the city -- increase membership of the committee to ten members. • c. voting -- draft language that reflects the agreement with the county that • in matters dealing within the impact zone the vote of the three members residing in the impact zone, in the aggregate, shall have the same weight as the vote of the remaining seven members of the planning, and zoning commission in the aggregate. d. (6.13 E. and other provisions regarding appeals) Establish a board of appeals for matters dealing with the impact zone. Pursuant to agreement with the county, the city and the county shall create a board of appeals consisting of two members appointed by the county and two members appointed by the city. e. (6.16) Fees -- Provide that fees assessed in the impact zone shall be established by the county commissioners and collected by the city for the benefit of the county -- possibly should address the need of the county to be responsible for costs of inspection, administration, and enforcement. f. enforcement -- Provide that the county authorizes the planning and zoning commission to enforce compliance with the provisions of the ordinance in that portion of the county that cornpr~ses the impact zone -- see agreement between county and city. c. voting -- draft language that reflects the agreement with the county that in matters dealing within the impact zone the vote of the three members residing in the impact zone, in the aggregate, shall have the same weight as the vote of the remaining seven members of the planning and zoning commssion in the aggregate. d. (6.13 E. and other provisions regarding appeals) Establish a board of appeals for matters dealing with the impact zone. Pursuant to agreement with the county, the city and the county shall create a board of appeals consisting of two members appointed by the county and two members appointed by the city. e. (6.16) Fees -- Provide that fees assessed in the impact zone shall be established by the county commissioners and collected by the city for the benefit of the county -- possibly should address the need of the county to be responsible for costs of inspection, administration, and enforcement. f. enforcement -- Provide that the county authorizes the planning and zoning commission to enforce compliance with the provisions of the ordinance in that portion of the county that comprises the impact zone -- see agreement between county and city. Y ~ ,. . 1. '.r. .. _.. , .. -... .r :...: O i ~:. ~ ~ }- m ~:ti ~ ~ W -~ -~~'. y G r ~ C/ 7 7' _. _... . - .. _;":~ f ' -'i -.~ O :~~'; ~ LT 1~ ~ a n ~~ , i.. c m ~' ~, ~ti. vzX ~ o ~ l - ~_ _..,, o n e t. ~ r: ~` m ~ ~ REX811R6 60LF CWRSE -,~ Y A; ". ti :, - - .. is r:'ti y Aries Dr u 'Surise'~`'`~Nsif3nne :~ _ o d ~ Clr ~ c 3 to o ~ X a C ~x' . , ~ 2 e n!e y ~. s ~; Soulh Ilr,~nch ~ O p ~~- O L~~:. ~ - - ~ N 5th W St c, . ~ T ~ - y ~~~ OVA _ `j n ~ -$~th u sth St ° '~ c !~ ` ~ ~ y u \ ~n/ Ci y ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ Stelnef ~ ~ (n ~_f <~ -- cn a o v 3 i n • ~ y rchard 3 y ' o • ` ? S 2nd W t~ t z y Mominp Slde Dr ~ y S 1st W St • t. ` y ~ r f/~ t} i~. ~ ~~e~ ~ y ~ o , ` it o r' n ~ r,~ ~e~ ~n~as x: , n er St ~ ~d estwood Dr q nler t ~ v ~ ~,; `-!legs Ar c ' O 7 Nlllvlew Dr v ' ~': S 1st Sc N 1s! E Sf ~: ~ H Vlsta Av ~ I - ~ ~ ;~ o teen E melt Prlncaf n -y ~ / 3' ° (/ N 2nd E St ii R S~ v S 2nd E St - v t ~ m ~j ,` r y m ', z to / 2 t n < o ~q ~ d t '~G ~ ~ '~h r >>' ~ _~ v ~ ,.j . ~ Ya e r Blrch Av A ~ _ ~ N nth E St I ~' Mo wk Av Elm Ar ~ I~ N ~~ Madl Av Y ~ o ~ n~ ,Z o o ~ Apache v ° ^. R. :^-~ sue: 0 0 o m_ro 500E 3 ez Porce ,f- K''o c~ ~ f'+~ ~: ~ x ~. mgt». 3 x3 ~ ~-;:;~,, . ~,_ w m ~ ~, a 3 ° Oy a A ~.. _ ~ r a hos one r ~ b y Dr one Dr z H' o ~ Y ~ ~ o~~ n ° ~i ~ Gary Or` ° J ~' ° ~ r O ° M -, .., ° Randy d m to ~ ~ ' ~" °' a ° ~ ,°~ Susan Dr a 0 ... a . . - t= m ° ~ - ! .. p .. .. -- . '~ ` ,. Q 3.20 TAHLE 2. LAND USE SCHEDULE P - Permitted Use C - Conditional Use _ LAND USE DISTRICT AGR. 1 AGR. 2 RURAL RES. RESIDENTIAL single family dwelling Home for mentallyJphysically handicapped Two family dwelling .Three family dwelling Four family dwelling Five and six family dwelling or development Twenty-four unite per building or development Dormitory, fraternity, sorority Boarding house Bed and breakfast Home occupation Manufactured home 24' or more in width (new) Mobile home or manufactured home less than 24' in width Approved mobile home court or subdivision Mobile home park (See mobile home park ordinance) Mobile home subdivision (See above ordinance) Nursing home Aeligioue dormitories Motels, hotels MANUFACTURING Focd and kindred products (sLUC 21) Meat products (211) Dairy products (212) Canning and preserving (213) Drain mill products (214) Bakery products (215) Sugar (216) Confectionery, candy (217) Beverage (218) Other food products Textile mill products (sLUC 22) Apparel and other clothing products (SLUG 23) Lumber and other wood products (SLUG 24) Sawmills and planning mills (242) Millwork (2431) Veneer and plywood (2432) Prefabricating wooden buildings (2433) Wooden containers (2440) Other Furniture and fixtures (sLUC 25) Paper and allied products (SLUG 26) Printing, publishing, including newspapers (SLUG 27) Chemicals and allied products (SLUG 28) Petroleum refining and related industries, including paving materials (sLUC 29) 47 • • • • LAND USE SCHEDULE LAND USE .AGR. 1 Rubber and plastic products (SLUG 31) Stone, clay, and glass products (SLUG 32) Flat glass, glass, glassware (321, 322) Cement manufacturing (323) Pottery and related products (325) Concrete, gypsum, and plaster (326) Cut stone products (327) Other Primary metal industries (9LUC 33) Fabricated metal products (9LUC 34) Ordnance and accessories (341) Machinery except electrical (3d2) Electrical machinery, equipment, supplies (343) Transportation equipment (344) Other Professional, scientific, optical goods (SLUG 35) Laboratory and research instruments (351) Instruments for measuring (352) Optical instruments and lenses (355j Photographic supplies and equipment (356) • Watches, clocks (357) Miscellaneous Jewelry manufacturing (391) Musical instruments (392) Other TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES Railroad, including terminals and yards (SLUG 41) Hue passenger terminals (sLUC 4121-4123) Bus garaging and equipment maintenance (4214) Motor freight terminals (4221) Motor freight garaging and maintenance (4222) Airport fields and terminals (4311-4314) Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance (4315) Automobile parking lots, garages (sLUC 46) Telephone exchange stations, microwave towers (471) Radio and television broadcasting stations (475) Radio and TV transmitting stations and towers (4732) Other communication facilities Electric generation plants, utility substations Utility storage yards Water treatment plants Wastewater treatment plants Solid waste disposal sites (SLUG 485) Other utility facilities WHOLESALE (sLUC 51) Electrical goods (516) ~~ -~ .Hardware, plumbing, heating, and supplies (517) 48 _ .. Page 2 DISTRICT AGR. 2 RURAL RES. LAND USE SCHEDULE Page 3 • LAND USE DISTRICT AGR. 1 AGR. 2 RURAL. RES. Drugs and druggists supplies (5121) Farm products, grain (5152) Professional equipment and supplies (5183) Dry goods and apparel (513) Petroleum bulk and stations and terminals (5192) Scrap and waste materials (junkyards) (5193) Recycling centers entirely enclosed in buildings All others RETAIL TRADE Lumber yards and building materials (SLUG 521) Heating and plumbing equipment (SLUG 522) Paint, glass, wallpaper (523) Electrical supplies (524) Hardware (5251) Farm equipment (5252) General merchandise (department, variety, etc.} (53) Groceries and other food stores (54) Seasonal food sales (roadside stands) • Convenience stores Motor vehicles (551) Tires, batteries, accessories (552) Gasoline service stations (553) Apparel and accessories (56) Furniture and home furnishings (57) Restaurants (581) Drug stores (591) Pharmacies Shopping centers, including malls Other retail storee (59) SERVICES Finance, real estate, and insurance services (SLUG 61) Personal services Laundry services (6211, 6212, 6213, 6215) Laundry and dry-cleaning, self service (6214) Photographic studios (622) Beauty and barber shops (623) Funeral and crematory services (624) Laundry pick-up, shoe repair, alteration (625) Other personal services Business services (SLUG 63) Credit and collection services (632) • Photocopying, blueprinting, and stenographic services (633) 49 • LAND USE SCHEDULE Page 4 LAND USE DISTRICT AGR. 1 AGR. 2 RURAL RES. Employment services (636) Research, testing services (6391) Consulting services (6392) Equipment rental and leasing services (6394) Detective, protective services (6393) Auto and truck rental aervicea (6397) other business aervicea Warehousing and storage aervicea (637) Farm products warehousing and storage (6371) Stockyards (6372) Refrigerated warehousing (6373) Food lockers (6374) Household goods warehousing and storage (6375) General warehousing and storage (6379) Repair services (SLUG 64) Automobile repair aervicea (6411) Automobile wash services (6412) Electrical repair services (6491) Radio and television repair services (6492) Watch, clock, jewelry repair services (6493) • Reupholstery and furniture repair aervicea (6496) Professional services (65) Physicians offices (6511) Dental offices (6512) Medical laboratory services (6514) Dental laboratory services (6515) Hospitals (6513) Out-patient medical services (6517) Legal aervicea (6520) Engineering and architectural services (6591) Educational and scientific research services (6592) Accounting and bookkeeping services (6593) Contract construction services (SLUG 66) Building contractor offices (6611) Building contractor storage yards (6611) Plumbing, heating, air conditioning aervicea (6621) Painting, wall papering, decorating services (6622) Electrical aervicea (6623) Masonry, stonework, and plastering services (6624) Carpentering, wood flooring installation (6625) Roofing and sheet metal services (6626) Concrete aervicea (6627) Water well drilling services (6628) Governmental services Police protection (6721) Postal service (673) Fire protection (6722) • Municipal, county offices (671) _ ___ 50 LAND USE SCHEDULE LAND USE Educational services Nursery schools, day care centers (6811) Schools (6812, 6813) College buildings Vocational schools (6831) Business schools (6832) Barber and beauty achoole (6833) Art and music schools {6834) Dancing achoole (6835) Driving schools (6836) Correspondence achoole (6837) Miscellaneous services (SLUG 69) Churches, synagogues, temples (6911) Welfare and charitable services (6920) Business asaociatione (6991) Professional membership organizations (6992) Labor organizations (6993) Civic, social, and fraternal organizations (6994) CULTURAL, ENTERTAINMENT, AND RECREATIONAL Cultural activities (SLUG 71) Libraries (7111) Museums (7112) Art galleries (7113) Public assembly (SLUG 72) Motion picture theaters (7212) Drive-in movies (7213) Auditoriums, legitimate theaters ( 7231, 7214) Stadiums, arenas, fieldhoueee (7221, 7222) Amusements (SLUG 73) Fairgrounds (7311) Amusement parks (7312) Arcades (7391) Miniature golf (7392) Golf driving ranges (7393) Go-cart tracks, four-wheeler tracks (7394) Radio controlled airplanes Recreational activities (SLUG 74) Golf course (7411) Golf course with country club (7412) Tennis courts (7413) Roller skating (7415) Ice skating (7414) Riding stables (7416) Bowling (7417) Skiing and tobogganing (7418) Athletic fields (7423) Recreation centers (7424) Athletic clubs and gymnasiums (7425) Page 5 • DISTRICT AGR. 1 AGR. 2 RURAL RES. See Table 1. University Zone (U) • ~I ~J 51 ~' • LAND USE SCHEDULE LAND USE Page 6 DISTRICT AGR. 1 AGR. 2 RURAL RES. Swimming pools (7432) Campgrounds and travel recreation vehicle courts (7491) Parke, including playgrounds (7610) AGRICULTURE Farming, fibers, grains, fruits, vegetable (811-814) Farming, dairy (815) Farming, livestock (816) Farming, poultry (817) Agricultural processing (821) Small animal veterinarian eervicea (totally enclosed) (8221) Large animal veterinarian eervicea (8221) Horticultural eervicea (8291) Plant nurseries Kennels MINING Sand, gravel pits r ~ OTHERS cemeteries Uses not related to above under SLUC codes (1) The above table of land uses permitted in each zone is based on the uses described in the Standard Land Uae Coding Manual, 1987 edition. A copy of the manual ie available in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rexburg. (2) Residential uses by right 1n the CBD, except for motels and hotels, are limited to the second floor and above. Residential uses on the first floor are conditional uses. (3) Manufactured homes on individual lots and not in mobile home parka shall meet the standards set forth under Note B of Table 1, Land Use Table. • 52 __.. _. 3.19 TABL£ 1. ZONZNC DISTRICTS. t DISTRICT USES STANDl.RDS FOR USES BY RZCHT ' ~~ J Minimum Minimum M1nlmum Minimum Haximum Maximums Minimum Lat Front Roar Side LoL BuildSnq 8y ASgAt Conditional Lot Urea Xidth Ynrd Yard Yard Cov_rage Height \.a ~: AGR. 1 t ~.. ~' • • • 3.19 DZS27tICT 1JSES By Right R.R. s .- TABLE 1. ZONING DISTRICTS. BTANDARD3 FOR USES BY AIGHT ' Hinimum Hinlmum Hinlmum Hinimum Mexlmum lSaximum~ Hitiimua Lot Yront Aear Side Lot Building Condltlonal Lot Area Width Yard Yazd Yard Coverage Height - ~' a ~, ' ~ d C ~ 4 ,~ 0 i~ Q ~ `ii~ d ~ ~ _ _, ~ -- - ~ - ,;~ _ ii ---- w (' ----- -- -- - ~ _i -- - ---- E ----- ~ _ --- _. _ -- - _-_ - _-. I _ - _ _.___.~. ~__._____ +_.. __ __.___ :.i -------- -f i -- ~-- I - -- - --- - -- __ ---.3 - ~ ------ k 'r '~ { ------ ----- ------ ---~- ------ ------ ~-- q 1- -. -- .... ._~. _-______-~_ ~ ---- ---__ __ ~ - _ _. - _ ~st____.___ _.___.___ _ __._ - .`__ __.._.,~ ~ w ~ ~" i .... ~ ~ ..~.~ .~.. ~ ~ ' - Q ... ___...__ _'y. ______ .__.__. ____. _ .. ~ . __..~{_____.. _.....__.__ L__--___ - - ' p f ~' ---- -- --- - - E ~ l ~ _ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ i ~ --- ---- - - ~~~ - -- I' ~ ~+ ~ ~ -- -- © -- - - ~ - - - .__. .~.__._ _ b ~.~ ~ -- - - ; -- - - -{ t--- -..--•-- L ~ --------- (a ~._ - ``~ . - - -- --- .. ~... --- ~...GQ ~,_ ~ ~ _- - -- ---- --- ~ - - - --- f I i ~ ~-- ~ -- -- ~ _ -d ',- ~~ ~ - : ~ ~ - __#~.- q ~ __ _. ~. 4 .,. --- -- -- - - ---- --- -- rt --~ { ~ --~- - ~ _.._ - - --- -~ - - - - r -- __----i ~ . ~ - ;-~ ~~ - - -- - - - ~ _ ~ ~ -- -j ------- j __-- (( __ ~ ~ ----± _ ~ --~-~ ---~-- 1'' , ~-~ ~ , ,.,. - - -- -- '2~ 'x-! --- - ; - 1 -- ---- -- ---- • your home, you will follow these guidelines. Joe gave the example of Idaho Falls and Bonneville County. On Hitt and Sunnyside road going North and South and on Anderson going East and West they have developed this type of road in a 3 way loop around the City and they have passed an ordinance saying - developer, county, everybody in the area, be aware that these roads are going to have to be this wide and as you develop your subdivision you will dedicate your half of the right of way along with the subdivision. The City or County will build the road but they expect that that right of way will be dedicated. Glen said those roads already exist. How do you put those controls in to effect on roads that do not exist such as the pink north-south road? Joe said you just say this is the counties master plan for roads (you would have to have this laid out with an exact alignment) but it would be no different then saying what the width would be on an existing road, you are just saying this future road is going to be here and take that into account as you design your subdivision. Richard said once you do that and once you restrict those land owners from certain activities or any activity, you restrict their ability to sell ground and would suggest to you there is a possible "taking". Joe said it has worked in other counties. (discussion of "taking".) Steve explained that this is the planning phase which gives the developer notice of what will be allowed and what will be required. . Joe expressed his concern that the way new houses are going up that if something isn't done we will eliminate the possibility of any of these roads by the way houses are presently being built. Richard mentioned that none of this could happen until you have a County Comprehensive plan. Joe felt you may not need a comprehensive plan but you would need control on the highway and a county wide highway ordinance, if nothing else. Richard asked if your were to run 11th South straight up by the subdivision to 2nd East (between the church and the subdivision) how big of a right of way can you put there. Joe said there is a 60 foot right of way, basically a 50 foot curb-to-curb section, so you are looking at 4 lanes of traffic with no parking on the street. That is as good as you can get. (More discussion of roads on south end) Planning and Zoning Commission members will look at the South area by 7th South and 11th South and come back with recommendations. (Also look at Hitt Road and Sunnyside Road in Idaho Falls.) Members will bring recommendations to P. & Z. on September 28, 1994. RE: IMPACT ZONE - RICHARD SMITHS RECOMMENDATIONS TOPIC: (300,97,,,IMPACT ZONE) Next item on the agenda was the Impact Zone. Richard Smith went through the existing Zoning Ordinance and created a new chapter for the • Impact Zone. The handout that he had was the suggestions or comments that he came up with on how to prepare a specific ordinance. Richard went through the handout. Comments on handout: • - Impact Zone will have 3 new zones - Ag.l, Ag.2 and Rural Residential. In looking at the manner that the original zones were drafted, Richard felt that they should redraft those and have them parallel and similar to the ones in the existing ordinance and all the verbiage about setbacks, etc. should be treated just as it is treated in the original ordinance. - Establish tables from the worksheets handed out, comparable to those contained in chapter 3. - Richard felt manufactured homes provisions should apply in Rural Residential but not in Ag.l and Ag.2. That would be single wides and the foundation provisions. A double wide on a foundation would be a house and allowed, but a double wide without a foundation, with just skirting, would probably need to be allowed in Ag.1 and Ag.2. (Some discussion of acreage and trailer homes). - If your zoned agricultural you can move a trailer in (for family etc.) If you start dividing off lots then it is a different problem. - Chapter 8 regarding nonconforming uses, etc - we should make nonapplicable and redraft a whole new section regarding those uses. Brads understanding was that the only thing they needed in there was a limit on feed lot cattle and other then that there would be no restrictions. Richard thought there were some of them that thought that the only Ag.2 Zone was going to be De11 Barney. There were others that thought that Ag.2 would be Dell Barney, Archibalds, Munns but not Steiners, Fugimotos. We told Steiners and Fugimotos that we would accept a number from them that would be considered their historic • animal population. - Jerry said the discussion was on Steiners and we have already agreed with them on certain historic numbers and they will come in under the addendum; but, there was no limit on any kind of cattle numbers in the Ag.2 except for the provision that if it became a feed lot, with the definition being over 1,000 or more cattle in a confined area over a space of a year it would show that as being a feed lot and then there would be some sort of recourse at that time. But, it didn't show any limitation on numbers for them to bring them in and winter them there and then take them back on the range. - We might have a question on the Sakotas who have asked to come in as Ag.2 and don't have any cattle and Fugimotos who we agreed to have-come in under an historical use where as they really have no existing use. Richard asked Jerry and Brad if they would take subsection 5.L (of Richards handout) and deal with the cattlemen and come up with some answers - get specifics and names and numbers. Chapter 6 - administration of impact zone. Membership---originally P. & Z. had 8 members with 1 being from the county, and they have now decided that there would be 2 more from the county and this would constitute the Impact Zone members, increasing the membership to 10. Jerry felt that the county commissioners were a little confused about this - they seem to feel that they get to choose all 3 members from the Impact Area. Richard said he looked at the original agreement that • they had agreed to 3 years ago and it was that the City would appoint 1 • member from the Impact Zone and the County would appoint 2. (All 3 need to live outside of the City.) Richard addressed the issue of voting. (Subsection c.) Steve said that what they agreed upon is that once the Impact Zone is in place the 3 county members will have the same amount of power as the 7 City members, which is what makes the City's appointing of one of the 3 County members critical because they get to weight their votes slightly towards getting a city issue passed in the Impact Zone. John said that he thought that on an Impact issue the City would designate 3 voters and when that vote came up it would go to those 6 - 3 city and 3 county. Steve felt it should be just the way it is written because these issues will impact the City. Discussion of which of the 3 county members was the City appointee. Brad replaced Bob Lee who was the city appointee but the county approved him. The county commissioners misunderstood that Brad should have been a City appointment. Richard said we need to draft it like this and bring it to them with the new chapter and their original agreement of 3 years ago. We can leave the 3 appointees as they are but the next appointee needs to be by the City. John explained to Brad that at the .moment we had 2 county members that are agricultural related and we need the 3rd member to be cattle or rural residential related. • Richard said that also the appeals process was to be different in the Impact Zone then is contained in the zoning ordinance. The appeals process was that they could appeal to a 4 member board - 2 appointed by the county and 2 by the city. If there is a dead lock it would go back to Planning & Zoning. Brad understood that it would go back to the Commissioners because they are the ones that the Impact people are. still voting for - they have no voting power in the city. Richard explained that the statue talks about that there be fair representation on any body that ministers the Impact Zone. In fact, we have much more then fair. When you compare the populations of the City with the Impact Zone we have negotiated to have an equal voting right with the City. That is the same basis that we come up with this separate appeals process - if somebody doesn't like the decision they can appeal it to two members of the City Council and two members of the County Commission. Jerry explained that there were 2 different processes here. As things come up and we write these the County Commissioners have the same authority as the City Council to accept or reject, but, once this is intact (and they were your voting representative as it came up through) and we have agreed to all this, then this committee will make those decisions. If it is appealed from that point then it goes to the appeals process. That is why it is so important that you have your input on this segment of it. (More discussion). Jerry said he would like to have time to look through Richards suggests • and make comments for-the next meeting. Richard asked that they specifically address the issues contained in item #5. There may be J~~P ~ some line items you may want to add. He also said we need to put • together a time line and move this along. Richard made the proposal that they meet October 12th at 6:00 and commit the entire meeting solely. to the Impact Zone. Meeting Adjourned. •