HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES JUNE 24, 1981MIIVUTES OF PLANNING & ZO~TIrTG ME_FTING
~June24, 1981
A meeting of the Planning & Zoning Committee for t'ne City of
Rexburg, P~adison County, held .June 24, 1981, at the City Hall.
Those Present: Chuck Frost - Chairman
Dan Hess
Glen Pond
Charles Cole
Leonard Longhurst
Mary Lee P?i11
Chuck Frost called the meeting to order and dispensed with the
reading of the minutes of the previous rleeting.
Chuck Frost said that he and Charles Cole had attended the last
City Council meeting and were-asked to continue their meetings on
the trailer overlay and give recommendations to the City Council.
Chuck Frost reviewed the Ordinance passed in 1969 by the City
Council and then reviewed the Ordinance passed in 1974 superceeding the
1969 Ordinance which stated in part that mobile homes are allowed only
in authorized trailer parks. But after the Teton Dam flood in 1975,
the city council granted temporary' perm~_ssion for mobile homes to be
parked on private property inthe city for a one year time limit.
Chuck Frost mentioned some alternatives: 1.
2
3
~;
L
To rec]uire trailers not on
a permanent foundation to i
be in trailer parks.
To modify the Trailer Overlay.
Make the trailer overlay
zone in different areas of
the city.
Chuck said the city council can't continue to deal with these cases on
a case-by-case basis, other alternatives would be to continue the present
system of temporary permits, strictly enforce the 1974 ordinance or to
legalize mobile homes in all areas of the cite. Chuck told the people
at the meeting that the commission were not trying to make a decision
tonight, that they were still gathering information.
Chuck Frost read letters that had been received concerning the overlay,
copies are attached to the minutes. Letters received from: Janet
McCullock, Glen Stelzer, Norman & Bernice Ricks, Ellen Nyquist, Donald
iQ. Jensen.
Dan Hess said people that have established homes and have well landscaped
yards are concerned, they do not want to make a modge podge of our city.
Some complaints were voiced on lots needing. weed mowing, Chuck advised
the people that letters were being sent to the owners by the City Clerks
office.
The matter of Dale McIntire of 144 N, 3rd West keeping goats at his pla~
was brought up. Chuck asked Marie to bring this matter to the attention
of the City Council.
Chuck asked for comments from the visitors at the meeting.
~~~' MINUTES OE PLAN?SING ~ ZONING
June 24, 1081 ~,
Page 2 '
• Sylvester_Cooper, ?_71 N. 3rd iaest, said they built their new home years
ago in this area with the understanding that the trailers would only be
allowed for one year.
Scott_Blackham, 411 W. 5th S.,~who is a trailer home owner said that if
he^h ad a^nice home he would not want a trailer moving in next to him,
but he felt that mobile homes should not be limited to one area of the
city.
Jared_Hepworth, 275 N. 2nd W., said there would be better neighborhoods
without trailers, he objects to them in his area.
Bob_Bell, 252 W. 2nd PI., is against the overlay, and complained about the
vacant lot next to them that is very rnesay, also four trailers on the
lot at 2C7 N. 2nd W. '
Rand~_Le~,~7is, 131 N. lst W., said that he'had been_ living at that same
address for 29 years, it used to be a nice residential area but has
changed to comrlercial and has the smell from Quality Pak and from Tri
State Tire when they burn their old tires, and the city does nothing
about that, and he reels that they (the city) should not be able to tell
them where they may or may not live. He also said that people have a
constitutional right to live .where or in whatever they choose, unless
they infringe on the rights os others.
Mrs. Randy Lewis .said that after the flood, they inherited their property,
• ~he~^did^not receive money to rebuild, since they did not have ahome
to start with. Young couples do not have the money to build homes, so
they go to trailers. She said the commission would be defeating its
own purpose by requiring mobile homes to be put on permanent foundations.
Once a permanent base is put under a mobile home, it will be expensive
and very difficult to move the structure to make way for a regular home,
which ,she says .seems to be the goal of the city. She feels that the
city is thinking more of the homes than the people.
Bernice_Ricks, 174 N. 3rd W., said that the Lewis`s are in a Commercial
Zone and she felt the situation was different for them. She said most
of the mobile homes she was objecting to were not being lived in by the
property owners, but were being rented to people who only stay for a
short time and they are not keeping the homes and yards cleaned up. She
also mentioned the trailer house that has been setting on the Mitchell
property at South 4th East for five years with nothing done with it,
also they have moved a house on the same property with windows. knocked
out which is a hazard, also there is a small shack in back with paint
in that children can get at. She mentioned the two homes just north
of 118 N. 3rd W. that Mr. Rodriquez started building and never finished
and nothing has been done with them.
Chuck advised the visitors to let the City Hall know on the unkept homes.
Clara Beesley, 8C N. SCth W., objected to the overlay eliminating her
• block because she had been wanting to put in a trailer court on her
property, but that she would see that it was kept up. She complained of
there bloc:lc being very messy, with empty lots, trailers and a business,
also a vacant basement that. needs to be taken care of.
MINUTES OF PLANNING & ZONING
June 24,.1981
P}a g e 3
Mrs. Hokanson, 311 N. 2nd W., said she felt that trailer houses should •
be in~trailer courts, but if people are in trailers now they should
be able to stay but not let new ones buy and move trailers on.
Janet_McCullock, 270 W. 2nd N:, said she didn't understand why Salem
Ave.^was considered R2 when all of the homes have been moved in. and
refurbished and how come Cul-de-sac is R3 instead of R2. Chuck Frost
said that that was a separate issue and would be covered at another
meeting.
John_Haeberle, 328 Cul de sac, felt that an overlay zone would result
in~even more^vacant lots filling up with trailers and he doesn't like
this idea of the value of his new home diminishir_g because of the mobile
homes nearby. _
Mrs. Sylvester_Cooper, 271 D1: 3rd West,~•_was against the overlay, she
does not object to the double wide homes that are on a foundation, but
she does object to the "Cracker box type" that are less than 700 square
feet. She referred to the 1974 Ordinance and said she felt it should be
strictly enforced because it forbids trailers any where but in
authorized parks. She said "Homes look best by hoTmes, and trailers
look best by trailers."
Randx Lewis asked Mary Lee Hill, a member of the planning commission and
a^real estate agent *.ahy mobile homes depreciate neighboring property.
Mrs. Hill said that it is a fact trailers do depreciate property.
Norman Ricks, 174 N. 3rd W., said that he had carried a petition to all
thelpeople~on N. 3rd W, to have it rezoned to R2. Trailers should not
be in R2 zone. When the year was up the trailers should have been moved.
Mr. Blackham_ said that trailers are more than just trailers, he said
his is his home not just a trailer.
?~Irs. Lewis felt the problems boiled down to problems eaith individuals
who don't keep their trailers and yards in good condition. She suggested
cleaning up the problem areas and to "leave the rest alone." She felt
they should not have to sell their lot and move into a trailer park.
Mrs. Ricks asked if the commission had done a survey as to who is living
in the trailer homes, if it is the owner or just rented. The commission
said they had not.
Chuck_Frost brought the questionan~3 answer session to a close and told
the visitors they were welcome to stay if they like, that the commission
were going to go over and review the material that had come in. He
said the commission is still accepting comments and told the visitors
to tell their friends and neighbors to call or write. to express their views
Glen Pond said we don't want to have to make individual situations.
Chuck Frost said he wondered if the trailer overlay was the right was t~
go. There is alot of opposition to it. The commission agreed, they
have to come up with a solution "so the council doesn't have to wrestle
~4INUTES OF PLAN:~IING & ZONING
June 24, 1981 '
Page 4
• with this for the next 10 years." He noted that the, home owners could
go to court now and force the city to stick to the 1974 Ordinance,
which would require mobile homes to be moved into trailer parks. Another
.alternative would be a modified .ordinance to allow double-wide homes,
if they are placed on permanent foundations and occupied by the o:aners,
those not meeting these specifications would have to be moved to mobile
home parks. At the same time trailer parks would be forced to meet
cit;~ regulations and be cleaned up.
The commission felt they should have a list compiled of mobile homes
that were parked under temporary permits.
The Commission will continue to gather input on the overlay zone and
expect to make a recommendation to the .city council at the commissions
July 22 meeting.
A motion-was made by Chuck Frost to adjourn seconded by Dan Hess. All Aye.
•
•
•
__ .
.. `~
_
~ ~ _
-
~ I
1
{
f~
r
I ~ ~~ ^
M _"
~ f
'~~
~ _~
~
~
u 4 ;~
$~ ~ ~~
~
.
~_
- ~- ~
, L
~ ^ _ ~ ~,
'
- ~ ~ r
~ ~
l ~,
~
_ ~
~
~
~
~ ~
r
L
+ ~
``l'3 O' ~
5
~ Y
l7
v
,V!
~~
T ~ b
G
;~. d~
. ~ J
~~
G
a~
~I
t ~
,_.
: i~