Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES APRIL 14, 1977RF~rBtTRG PTIANNII~G BOARD April '1~~., 1977 Present • Ji_m' Keifer T~eonard. Longhurst Gale jrTeber TaThtey Brock Alice Tout Norm Holman, City Council Meeting began 7:40 p.m. at City Nall Vdhtey Brock Conducted. BUSII~~SS 1: ~_zscussion ensued concerning the duality of building construction and nspecticn. `Examples were cited about house inspections from the czar an,a the Oty's reputation concerning inspections. 2. Gale i~lebe.r reported Nary Smith's _interpretation of whose respon- sibi_lty public hearings are.... If property is to be annexed and zoned the Planning beard. is to set and conduct the hearing. If property is a~ready in;the-City and a zoning change is requested thus necessitating a change in the zoning ordinance, the pity council. sets~~;nd conducts the hearing. 3, VThitey Brock signed a copy of the Park Place Conc3ominzum plat plan, %~. The list of building permits for l~larcb. 1g77.were read ~,nd di.scussed> 5. The ~~;uestion was raised concerning the revised.Tlectrical Code Tom 1~~Iatthezvs was working on last year. ti^Tas it ever adopted a,nd if so could the planning board have a copy? 6. George '~Lr:I iss ti~lillmore anal his wife Judy, presented a .sketch of a proposed condominium deve~_opment on 2nd East approx. 44 & 46 South. property is'33C~deep and~l65' wide. 1~2r. Willmore assured `the Board t all bui:ldi:rg and_ parking requirements would be met. He i:s "skin; -for `l' a~~e story and un.ffinished. basement units including gera~es (2 of which will have double garages) andgl.0 two story units with unfinished 'base= meets and ,tingle garage's. All units will face South. ~~uestions arose concerning required setbacks in ~. ~ommercia.l zone which also has residential hQZ~es uth~re th.e set .back is already establi_shed._ However, the Phillips building is not in line with the residential hoes. The Board suggested he .cheek with I~~ary Smith. fore." ruling on required setbacks in Commercial zones- Parkin" was adequate by eliminating ? of the original 12 two star;~r uni.tsq With 1:3 units he needs 36 parking spaces. 7. i~ar I~IamNaring presen.te~ a netia rer~uest for a zonir_,~ change of the R2 property tn.ey acquired both. before anal after the :~1~ood ' (approx.... 2-2 . acres) . He stated that they have purchased both the John ,Lt4e ("?.ready coned' industrial) and the ~,•Tilding homes (zoned R2) since the :flood.. They would lid.€e to convert the- ~~+Iilcting home to an office., Tk~ey elan to construct a Large roof.. and floor trues manza.faetuning. bui'.~ding (1],.00 sq... ft>) and stated they already had the bui.l,dingpermiteventhough a p~ri,ion of it was indicated to be built in the R2 zane property. :, ue asked for_ a limited commercial zone upon the recommendatioxi of others' but the Board_ unanimouslyfelt that that zone did not apply to then business and`they really. should consider Industrial 1. ~fanwaring ale asked that abridge be built over the canal and a road be con,structea to the highwray so large trucks could travel outside the r_~sidental area. Buffer zones and fencing were discussed and Nianwarin~ said he-was workn .with the home owners..in the area.. I• I~ianwaring dial not have signed 'petitions as such. He claimed Host people were against signing anything. `lhe question was raised as to whether the P~Ia.nwarin.g case was in court in which cs,se the Planning Board would not want to recomme?id any aeti.on until the <c©urt case was settled. ' Va.r 1~=~anwaring stated they were not in court and only wished to get °this matter legally settled so their could contznue their. business wi.th,in the law, The ~3oard unanimously recommended that the City Council hold a hearing on his r_er~uest fora gone change to Industrial 1 with the stipulation that this recommendation is only valid if the case is got already under ~?_e~~.l action. Pieeta.n~ ad ourned 9.~C~ p.m,