Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 6.18.26(208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Planning and Zoning Minutes – June 4, 2026 P&Z Commissioners: City Staff: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair) Alan Parkinson – P&Z Administrator Sally Smith (Chairperson) Brian Thackeray Christina Gilman – P&Z Administrative Assistant Aaron Richards Vern Muir Kyle Baldwin – Planner 1 Jim Lawrence Dan Hanna Natalie Powell – Compliance Officer Bruce Casper Tammy Geddes Spencer Rammell – Commissioner Attorney McKay Francis Rick Robinson Chairperson Smith opened the meeting at 6:30 PM. Planning & Zoning Meeting: 1. Welcome & Pledge of Allegiance 2. ROLL CALL of Planning and Zoning Commissioners: Present: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair), Bruce Casper, Brian Thackeray, Rick Robinson, McKay Francis, Vern Muir Absent: Sally Smith, Aaron Richards, Jim Lawrence, Dan Hanna, Tammy Geddes 3. Approval of the P&Z Minutes for June 6, 2026 (Action) MOTION: Motion to approve the Planning & Zoning minutes for June 6, 2026 (Action) Action: Approve, Moved by Bruce Casper, Seconded by Brian Thackeray VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes = 4, No = 0, Abstain = 2). Yes: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair), Bruce Casper, Brian Thackeray, Rick Robinson No: Abstain: McKay Francis, Vern Muir 4. Plat – (26-00258) University Towne Center - Plat - Located at approximately 901 S Yellowstone Hwy, the application is to subdivide the property into eight (8) lots. – Tyson Cichos (Action) Planning & Zoning Administrator Parkinson introduced the new Planning & Zoning Administrative Assistant, Christina Gilman. Conflict of Interest/Ex parte Conversation: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair) asked the Commissioners to disclose any conflicts of interest or conversations held outside of this meeting relative to this particular subject. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Presentation: Planning and Zoning Administrator Parkinson reported that the proposed plat had been reviewed and was found to meet all applicable requirements. Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the plat to the City Council. Administrator Parkinson then presented the final plat layout and identified its location within the city, noting that it was situated near the future Olive Garden, Chipotle, and Café Zupas developments. Commissioner Robinson asked about anticipated traffic impacts and whether improvements to University Boulevard were planned to accommodate additional traffic generated by the development. Administrator Parkinson explained that a traffic impact study had been submitted and that roadway improvements would be required as part of the development process. Administrator Parkinson also noted that another plat was being processed on the opposite side of University Boulevard and that the combined developments could result in significant roadway improvements extending to 5th West. Commissioner Casper inquired about ongoing site work and zoning classifications in the area. Administrator Parkinson explained that construction activities were proceeding at the developer’s own risk prior to final approval and clarified that the property was located within the Community Business Center (CBC) zone, while properties south of University Boulevard were zoned Regional Business Center (RBC). Commissioner Francis asked about the accuracy of the listed property address and the relationship of the site to the former Sun Pro property. Administrator Parkinson clarified that the address was only an approximation because no official address had yet been assigned and confirmed that the proposed plat was not located on the former Sun Pro property. Staff provided additional orientation regarding the site’s location in relation to nearby businesses and developments. Further discussion focused on access points and the layout of the plat. Staff reviewed the lots included within the plat, identified adjacent developments, and explained that multiple access points would be available from Yellowstone Highway and internal road connections. Administrator Parkinson indicated that the existing western access near McDonald’s was expected to remain unless future traffic conditions warranted changes. No further questions were raised. No further significant concerns were raised, and the discussion moved toward calling for a motion. MOTION: Commissioner Casper makes a motion to accept the plat for 8 lots at approximately 901 S Yellowstone Hwy and those lots are to be subdivided. Vice Chair Kempton stated that we will make the recommendation to city council to approve the plat. Commissioner Casper agreed. Vice Chair Kempton stated we will amend that motion. Seconded by Commissioner Robinson. All Ayes...Motion Carries. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Action: Approve, Moved by Bruce Casper, Seconded by Rick Robinson. VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes = 6, No =0, Abstain = 0) Yes: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair), Bruce Casper, Brian Thackeray, Rick Robinson, McKay Francis, Vern Muir No: Abstain: 5. Public Hearing – (26-00321) Basic American – Annexation – Located at approximately 80 E 7th N, the application is to amend the city boundaries. – City of Rexburg (Action) Presentation: Randll Kempton introduced the first public hearing regarding an annexation – Located at approximately 80 E 7th N, the application is to amend the city boundaries. Planning and Zoning Administrator Parkinson presented a proposed annexation of the Basic American property located at approximately 80 East 7th North. Administrator Parkinson explained that recent changes to annexation laws limited involuntary annexations to properties that were either surrounded by the city or receiving city services. Administrator Parkinson stated that the proposed annexation qualified under the implied consent provision because the property was currently utilizing city sewer, water, and fire suppression services. Administrator Parkinson reported that the annexation request had been reviewed and recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval to the City Council. Administrator Parkinson identified the parcels included in the annexation area and noted that all of the affected parcels were owned by Basic American. During discussion, Administrator Parkinson advised that any future motion could reference all parcels included in the application rather than listing each parcel individually. City Attorney Spencer Rammell addressed the Commission regarding a formal objection submitted by counsel for Basic American Foods concerning the proposed annexation (see attachment). The City Attorney explained that he had reviewed the objection and the applicable provisions of Idaho Code governing annexations based on implied consent. He outlined the statutory requirements, noting that implied consent may be established when a property is connected to a city-owned and operated water or wastewater system and the connection was completed before July 1, 2008. The City Attorney reported that the property was connected to the city’s sewer and fire suppression water systems and that documentation had been obtained confirming the connection existed prior to July 1, 2008. Work orders from 1999 and 2007 were presented for the record as evidence supporting the city’s position. Based on his review, the City Attorney concluded that the statutory requirements for implied consent had been met and advised that the city had legal authority to proceed with the annexation process. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org The City Attorney further explained that, because the annexation qualified under the implied consent provisions of state law, the portions of the statute cited in the objection did not apply. He noted that Basic American Foods retained the right to challenge the annexation but stated that, in his legal opinion, the city could lawfully continue with the annexation proceedings. The City Attorney then offered to answer questions from the Commission. Commissioner Casper discussed the purpose of the proposed annexation and asked why the city was pursuing the annexation at this time. Administrator Parkinson explained that previous discussions regarding annexation had occurred in connection with a community block grant project several years earlier, but no formal agreement had been executed. Administrator Parkinson stated that the property was a significant community asset that generated impacts on city infrastructure, particularly city streets used by truck traffic accessing the facility. Staff noted that annexation would allow the city to receive property tax revenue that could help support the maintenance and improvement of infrastructure serving the area. The City Attorney added that the property had been utilizing city services, including sewer, water for fire suppression, and access via city-maintained roads, while not currently contributing property taxes to the city. He explained that annexation would allow the city to collect property tax revenue associated with the property while continuing to provide those services. Commissioner Thackery asked questions regarding the history of the utility connections and whether the property owners had requested service from the city. The City Attorney and Administrator Parkinson indicated that they believed the utility connections had been requested by the property owner, although documentation confirming that detail was not immediately available. The City Attorney noted that property owners are generally required to request such services and that additional information could be provided during the City Council review process. Further discussion addressed the property’s wastewater disposal operations and water supply. Administrator Parkinson explained that Basic American Foods utilized several pivot-irrigated fields to disperse wastewater generated by its processing facility and that the company also owned additional land in the Salem area for the same purpose. Administrator Parkinson stated that the wastewater disposal fields were an important component of the company’s operations and would remain under the company’s ownership. Staff further clarified that, aside from the fire suppression connection, the facility relied on its own wells for culinary and industrial water needs and that annexation would not affect the company’s ownership or use of those wells. After all questions had been addressed, the Commission proceeded to the public hearing. Vice Chair Kempton opened the public hearing at 6:58 PM on Basic American Foods property and invited testimony from those in favor, neutral, or opposed to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. No comments were offered in support of the proposal. Terrell Westover – 994 Russell Rd., Rexburg. A neighboring property owner spoke in a neutral capacity and asked whether the annexation would have any impact on his property, which borders Basic American Foods. He also expressed concerns regarding odors associated (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org with the facility’s wastewater disposal operations and asked whether annexation would result in changes to those operations or make the issue the responsibility of the city. Administrator Parkinson responded that the annexation would not result in any physical changes to the facility’s operations, wastewater disposal practices, or water application processes. The annexation was solely related to bringing the property within the city limits due to its use of city services and would not alter the company’s existing operations. The City Attorney Rammell explained that the issue of odors was not directly related to the annexation request before the Commission. He noted that the city has nuisance ordinances and encouraged the property owner to discuss the matter further with the city’s code compliance officer, Natalie. Attorney Rammell further explained that existing operations would likely be considered legal nonconforming uses, often referred to as being “grandfathered,” and that annexation alone would not provide authority to require changes to the facility’s current operations. Terrell Westover asked for clarification regarding the concept of grandfathered uses and whether the annexation would affect neighboring properties. The City Attorney provided a general explanation of legal nonconforming uses and indicated that additional analysis could be conducted if the annexation were approved. Staff concluded by stating that the annexation would have no direct effect on neighboring properties. The public comment was then concluded. During the public hearing, Doug Sakota – 1245 N 2nd E, in a neutral capacity asked whether annexation would affect the utility rates paid by Basic American Foods and whether the company would receive different water or sewer rates once annexed into the city. Administrator Parkinson indicated that they did not have that information available and stated that utility billing staff would be better equipped to answer the question. No further comments were offered. Vice Chairman Kempton then invited testimony from anyone opposed to the annexation. No one came forward to speak, and staff confirmed that there were no participants online wishing to provide comment. The Chairman noted that written correspondence opposing the annexation from Basic American Foods had previously been received and reviewed by the Commission. Randall Kempton then closed the public hearing at 7:06 PM and brought the item back to the Commission for discussion. Commissioner Discussion: Following closure of the public hearing, commissioners discussed the proposed annexation and sought clarification regarding its impacts. Administrator Parkinson confirmed that the annexation would not result in any physical changes to the facility, its operations, wastewater disposal practices, or surrounding properties. The primary effect of annexation would be the inclusion of the property within the City limits and the resulting change in property tax obligations. Commissioner Casper also confirmed that the annexation would not affect odor concerns raised during the public hearing. Administrator Parkinson then identified the location of the proposed revised City boundary as shown on the annexation map. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Discussion occurred regarding a potential motion, with the Vice Chair indicating a motion would be appropriate if there were no further discussion. Commissioner Thackery expressed reservations about the proposal, stating that while he understood the city’s reasoning and acknowledged the logic behind it, they were uncomfortable with the concept of annexing property that was not yet an island. Commissioner Thackery noted concern from the property owner’s perspective but reiterated their understanding of the city’s position. In response, if a business was receiving city services, it was reasonable for it to be included within the city and contribute to the tax base. It was further noted that residents had expressed concerns about how tax dollars were being used, and situations where city services were provided without corresponding tax contributions could impact the city’s ability to fund improvements and services. Clarification was provided regarding utility payments and taxation. The City Attorney explained that while the property owner was paying for water and sewer services through utility bills, they were not contributing through property taxes, which fund other city services such as roads. Commissioner Thackery acknowledged this distinction and reiterated that while the annexation made sense for long-term planning and infrastructure funding, they remained personally uncomfortable with it. Administrator Parkinson provided additional information regarding the location of utility service lines and confirmed that documentation would be included in the record to show how water and sewer services were delivered to the property. Further discussion clarified the types of utility lines and their functions. Concerns were raised about future infrastructure impacts if services were extended further in the area. The City Attorney also addressed statements made in a letter regarding the city’s capacity to provide services, clarifying that while there would be capacity considerations, impact and capacity fees could be assessed to accommodate additional demand. It was noted that this issue was separate from the statutory provisions governing the annexation. The City Attorney cited the applicable Idaho Code sections related to implied consent annexation and noted recent legislative updates affecting annexation procedures. In response to a question about the origin of the proposal, staff explained that discussions with the property owner had been ongoing for several years. Administrator Parkinson also referenced a prior annexation completed under similar circumstances, where a property receiving city services was annexed despite not being surrounded by the city, in order to address inconsistencies in service and jurisdiction. It was noted that no other similar situations were currently being pursued. The Vice Chairman then indicated readiness to proceed with a motion. Following discussion, a motion was made. MOTION: Commissioner Franics makes a motion to recommend to city council the approval of the annexation of 80 East 7th North to amend city boundaries to include these unincorporated properties of the approximate address provided as the annexation meets legal bounds of usage according to section 50-222 and (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org specifically section 2C relating to implied consent by using city services and therefore being annexed into the City of Rexburg. Seconded by Commissioner Casper. Action: Approve, Moved by McKay Francis, Seconded by Bruce Casper. VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 6, No= 0, Abstain= 0) Yes: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair), Bruce Casper, Brian Thackeray, Rick Robinson, McKay Francis, Vern Muir No: None Abstain: None Commissioner Discussion on the Motion: During discussion of the motion, a commissioner suggested including language referencing “implied consent” to strengthen the legal clarity. The motion was restated to reflect that the annexation qualified under Section 50-222, specifically Section 2C, relating to implied consent through the use of City services. 6. Public Hearing – (26-00544) White Owl - Comp Plan change from IR to C – Located at approximately 4 W Moody Road, the application is to change the comprehensive plan designation from Intermediate Residential to Commercial. – Trellis Development/Bron Leatham (Action) Presentation: Randall Kempton introduced the second public hearing regarding a Comp Plan change from IR to C – Located at approximately 4 W Moody Road, the application is to change the comprehensive plan designation from Intermediate Residential to Commercial. Planning and Zoning Administrator Parkinson introduced the request of a public hearing for a comprehensive plan map amendment requested by White Owl for property located at approximately 4 West Moody Road. The request was to change the comprehensive plan designation from Intermediate Residential to Commercial. Administrator Parkinson presented the proposal on behalf of the applicant, explaining that the request involved two parcels located near the recently developed temple site and adjacent church property. It was noted that the applicant sought the designation change in order to allow for future commercial development. Currently, the back lot is zoned light industrial. Administrator Parkinson reviewed the surrounding area, identifying nearby features including the temple, a future stake center, and adjacent church-owned property. It was noted that the church-owned land had multiple designations and that future plans for that property had not yet been finalized. No changes had been made to the comprehensive plan for those parcels at the time of platting, as future uses were still undetermined. In response to questions from Commissioner Francis, Administrator Parkinson clarified the location of the stake center and other site features and confirmed that the applicant’s request (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org would align with existing and planned development patterns. Staff further noted that the temple use could remain under the current designation, but any future commercial or residential development on nearby parcels would need to comply with applicable zoning and comprehensive plan requirements or seek amendments. Administrator Parkinson stated that staff have reviewed the request and found no reason to deny it, recommending approval of the comprehensive plan change to the City Council. Randall Kempton opened the public hearing at 7:25 for a comprehensive plan map amendment requested by White Owl for property located at approximately 4 West Moody Road. The request was to change the comprehensive plan designation from Intermediate Residential to Commercial. He then invited public comments, first from those in favor, then those neutral, and finally those opposed to the proposal. No individuals came forward to speak in favor, neutral, or opposition. It was confirmed that there were no participants wishing to speak online. Vice Chairman Kempton inquired about any written correspondence related to the proposal. Administrator Parkinson indicated that no formal written comments had been submitted, although a verbal comment had been received but not formally entered into the record. The Chair closed the public hearing at 7:26 PM and moved the item to Commission discussion. Commission discussion reflected uncertainty regarding the proposed comprehensive plan change. Commissioner Thackery expressed confusion about introducing additional commercial designations in the area, noting that the surrounding development pattern—particularly near the temple—typically favored residential uses and questioning whether the proposal would create an inconsistent or “hodgepodge” land use pattern. Commissioner Francis acknowledged these concerns but noted that properties adjacent to major roadways, including the highway, were often more appropriate for commercial or less intensive residential uses due to noise and access considerations. Administrator Parkinson explained that the subject property was currently designated light industrial in part and that the proposed change to commercial could be viewed as a transition toward less intensive use. Administrator Parkinson further clarified that the comprehensive plan represents a long-term vision and may evolve as new developments, such as the temple and surrounding projects, emerge. It was noted that the plan must remain flexible, as future uses of nearby church-owned property were not yet determined. Staff also emphasized that commercial areas within developing neighborhoods can provide nearby services and reduce travel distances for residents. Commissioners discussed the size and limitations of the parcels, acknowledging that large- scale commercial development, such as big-box retail, would not be feasible and that potential uses would likely consist of smaller-scale commercial or professional services. Concerns were raised about one of the parcels’ proximity to existing residential properties and the uncertainty of future uses. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Commissioner Casper suggested tabling the item to obtain additional information from the applicant; however, legal counsel advised that decisions on comprehensive plan amendments must be based on the merits of the request itself, rather than speculative future development or specific project details. It was clarified that the applicant was not required to be present and that future zoning or conditional use permit requests would provide additional opportunities for review. The City Attorney emphasized that the Commission’s role was to evaluate the comprehensive plan amendment based on established criteria, including consistency with long-term planning goals, public welfare, infrastructure impacts, and changing circumstances. One commissioner stated that, based on current information, the proposal appeared premature given the limited known development in the area and expressed hesitation to support the change at this time. The Commission observed that the lack of public comment or opposition could indicate limited concern from nearby property owners, though the Commission remained divided as discussion continued. A motion was initially made to recommend denial of the comprehensive plan amendment; however, legal counsel advised that the stated reasoning—lack of information—was not sufficient to support a defensible decision. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. A revised motion was proposed to recommend denial of the comprehensive plan amendment based on concerns regarding land use compatibility and whether the proposal met the threshold required for amending the comprehensive plan. Legal counsel encouraged the Commission to clearly tie its reasoning to established evaluation criteria, particularly compatibility with surrounding land uses. Further discussion followed, with commissioners expressing differing perspectives. Some commissioners-maintained concerns that the proposed commercial designation was not consistent with the current development pattern and could create isolated or premature commercial areas. Others expressed support for the amendment, noting that a mix of commercial and residential uses could appropriately serve the developing area and provide needed services to nearby residents. The City Attorney reiterated that the Commission’s role was to make a recommendation based on the applicable criteria and that the discussion would assist the City Council in its final decision. The prior motion was withdrawn, and the Chair opened the floor for a new motion as deliberation continued. MOTION: Commissioner Thackery made a motion to make a proposal that we recommend denial to City Council because amending the comp plan doesn’t go along with the community design. Commissioner Thackery withdraws previous motion. General Discussion MOTION: Commissioner Francis makes a motion that we recommend to City Council the approval of a comp plan change from Intermediate Residential to (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Commercial at 4 W Moody Rd. because of the adjacent land use current development and planned growth in this section I feel that it meets the appropriate bounds to make a change to the comprehensive plan. Seconded by Commissioner Muir. Action: Approve, Moved by McKay Francis, Seconded by Vern Muir VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 4, No= 2, Abstain= 0) Yes: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair), Rick Robinson, McKay Francis, Vern Muir No: Brian Thackeray, Bruce Casper Abstain: None Vice Chair Kempton declared that the motion carried and confirmed that the Commission would forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for consideration. 7. Public Hearing – (26-00541) White Owl – Rezone from LI & MDR2 to Commercial – Located at approximately 4 W Moody Road, the application is to rezone approximately 14.24 acres from Light Industrial (LI) and Medium Density Residential 2 (MDR2) to Community Business Center (CBC). – Trellis Development/Bron Leatham (Action) Presentation: Randall Kempton introduced the Rezone from LI & MDR2 to Commercial – Located at approximately 4 W Moody Road, the application is to rezone approximately 14.24 acres from Light Industrial (LI) and Medium Density Residential 2 (MDR2) to Community Business Center (CBC). Planning and Zoning Administrator Parkinson introduced the next agenda item, a public hearing for a zone change at approximately 4 West Moody Road, the same property previously discussed. The request was to rezone approximately 14.24 acres from Light Industrial and Medium Density Residential to Community Business Center. Administrator Parkinson presented the item on behalf of the applicant, stating that the proposal had been reviewed and was found to meet the applicable code requirements. It is recommended that the Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Vice Chairman Kempton then asked if there were any questions from the Commission specific to the zone change; no questions were raised. Vice Chairman Kempton opened the public hearing at 8:08pm for the proposed zone change and invited public comment from those in favor, neutral, or opposed. Initially, no comments were offered, and no participants spoke either in person or online. Prior to closing the public hearing, Doug Sakota – 1245 N 2nd E requested to speak in favor of the proposal. Mr. Sakota stated that he was familiar with the property owners and indicated that the proposed commercial zoning would support the needs of residents in the nearby Homestead development. He explained that providing nearby commercial services, such as offices or (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org medical services, would be beneficial and reduce the need for residents to travel longer distances. He also noted that planned improvements to Moody Road and connectivity to the surrounding area would support commercial development in this location. No additional comments were made in favor, neutral, or opposition. Vice Chairman Kempton closed the public hearing at 8:11pm and brought the item back to the Commission for discussion. Commission discussion on the proposed zone change was limited. Commissioner Francis stated that their position on the zone change was consistent with their earlier decision on the comprehensive plan amendment and had no additional comments. Commissioner Thackery noted that, given the Commission’s prior action recommending approval of the comprehensive plan change, their previous concerns had been resolved. He no longer had objections and expressed support for the proposed zone change. The Chair acknowledged the comments and called for a motion. MOTION: Commissioner Muir makes a motion to recommend to the City Council the rezoning from LI and MDR2 to commercial located at approximately 4 W Moody Rd. in accordance with the comprehensive plan. Seconded by Commissioner Robinson. All AYES…MOTION CARRIES. Action: Approve, Moved by Vern Muir, Seconded by Rick Robinson VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 6, No= 0, Abstain= 0) Yes: Randall Kempton (Vice Chair), Rick Robinson, McKay Francis, Vern Muir, Brian Thackeray, Bruce Casper No: Abstain: None At the recommendation of the City Attorney, the motion was amended to include that the proposed zone change was in accordance with the comprehensive plan, as previously recommended for amendment by the Commission. The Chair asked for any final updates before adjournment. Administrator Parkinson indicated that one or possibly two subdivision plats were expected for the next meeting, although they were not yet confirmed as final. It was noted that staff were still completing final preparations and would attempt to have the items ready for the July 2nd meeting if possible. Staff stated that, if necessary, the items could be postponed to the following meeting, provided doing so would not create issues for the developer. It was also confirmed that the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting was scheduled for July 2nd, following the July 1st City Council meeting, which fell on a Wednesday due to the holiday schedule. Commission members were encouraged to provide early notice if they would be unavailable for the July 2nd meeting in order to ensure a quorum could be met. It was discussed that, if a (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org quorum could not be assembled due to holiday conflicts, the meeting items could be postponed to the subsequent meeting. Staff provided an update on board membership, noting that one replacement had been confirmed but would not be available until July 16th. It was further reported that the Mayor was working to identify two additional replacements, as a total of four members were expected to be absent by the end of the year. Staff requested continued assistance from current members during this transition period. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:16pm