HomeMy WebLinkAboutDowntown RFP Evaluation Rubric (1)REXBURG DOWNTOWN RFP EVALUATION RUBRIC
DEVELOPER’S
NAME
REVIEWER NAME
COMPONENT + CRITERIA
POINTS POSSIBLE
POINTS EARNED
QUALITY
Quality of the development proposal, with specific detail on how it addresses the project vision and goals.
CONTEXT
Evaluators are encouraged to read the “Rexburg City Center District Strategic Vision & Development Blueprint 2050” document as this plan outlines the RFP vision for this project. This
plan outlines that the City Center should create a sense of place. As this is accomplished, “Rexburg’s City Center will be the community and regional hub for economic growth and prosperity.
Strengthening commercial, entertainment, cultural and public assets creates a livable and prosperous City Center”
Project goals are:
Energize prime commercial parcels in the heart of the City
Work with City and RURA to replace and increase publicly accessible parking at each location (as shown in table, pg. 9 of RFP)
Introduce adequate parking and intentionally designed space where people gather, and local restaurants and businesses thrive
Facilitate connectivity among City Center businesses, residents, and visitors, while complementing adjacent businesses and buildings
Elevate, expand, and promote City Center as a multi-faceted activity center with a healthy mix of hospitality, retail, dining, service, civic, arts, entertainment, recreation, and residential
uses that supports the needs of the community and the region
Offer a proven financial structure that allows the City and RURA to continue to realize ongoing, versus one-time, financial benefits related to original ownership of the property
30
COMPATABILITY
Compatibility of the development proposal with site planning considerations and existing land uses within the area.
Evaluators are encouraged to read the Form Based Zone: Core Transect (§12.06.100). This is a high-density mixed use transect which provides opportunities for shopping, working, and living
in the core of the community. This area should promote a vibrant urban environment.
10
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY
Financial capability of the respondent to consummate the development, in particular the respondent’s ability to implement the development proposal within the proposed timeline.
20
QUALIFICATIONS
Qualifications of the respondent’s team to implement its development proposal within the proposed timeline.
20
REFERENCES
Three successful past projects similar in size and scope with references.
15
FINANCIAL BENEFIT
Quantify the level of investment and financial benefit to the Taxing Entities.
(Downtowns generally should produce significantly more revenue for a community than any other area)
15
COLUMN TOTALS
110
NOTES: