HomeMy WebLinkAboutArnold & Mindi Thiebaud - 287 Jill Dr Deborah Lovejoy
From: ArnoldT <arnold3@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 12:45 PM
To: Deborah Lovejoy
Subject: Re: Case #25-01318 (Loya —Comp Plan Map Amendment from LR to IR)
We are writing to formally express our opposition to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment for the 1.68 acres located at approximately 204 S 5th W. While I understand the city's
need for growth, transitioning this site from Low Residential (LR) to Intermediate Residential
(IR) presents significant concerns regarding public safety and neighborhood integrity.
1 . Public Safety and Traffic Infrastructure Capacity - The staff report requires the Commission to
consider the capacity of existing public streets and potential increases in peak hour traffic. The
current infrastructure is insufficient for the density allowed under an IR designation (such as MDR1 or
MDR2):
• North Access (Park St. & 2nd S): This intersection already faces significant congestion. The
proximity of the small park—which lacks enough parking too close to the corner—combined
with an offset crosswalk and the two roads (Park St. and 2nd S.) creates a high-risk
environment for pedestrians and cars.
• South Access (Henderson St.): The intersection at Henderson St. and 5th W is a primary
route for cars, school buses, and sidewalk pedestrians which already face opposite traffic
coming out of Campus Courtyard. Adding a high-density complex exit here will exacerbate
existing "competing traffic" and safety hazards for all.
• Lack of Mitigation: There are currently no left-turn lanes or traffic signals at either end of S
5th W to manage current volumes, let alone the "significant increase in the density of people"
and "change in circulation patterns" that this amendment would invite.
2. Neighborhood Character and Privacy The subject property is bordered on the north, west, and
south by Low Residential designations. This proposal is not a simple "fill-in" project; it is an
infringement on the established character of a traditional residential neighborhood.
• Density Impact: The IR designation allows for Medium Density Residential (MDR1/MDR2)
zones, which are incompatible with the quiet enjoyment of the surrounding LR homes.
• Privacy Concerns: An increase in density and potential building height would take away the
privacy of adjacent single-family homes and introduce increased noise and illumination.
3. Conclusion Because the existing street infrastructure cannot safely support the increased
circulation patterns and the proposal fails to protect the character of the adjacent LR parcels, I ask
that the Commission follow its authority to recommend Denial of this application to the City Council.
Sincerely,
Arnold and Mindi Thiebaud
287 Jill Dr., Rexburg
i
Thanks,
Arnold Thiebaud
z