Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout24611 - Local Professional Services 2nd E Safety ImprovementsIdaho Transportation Department Local Professional Services Agreement Agreement #: 97414 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ______ day of __________________, _______, by and between the CITY OF REXBURG, whose address is PO Box 280 Rexburg, ID 83440, hereinafter called the "Sponsor," and HMH, LLC, whose address is 3882 N. Schreiber Way, Ste 104, , Coeur d'Alene, ID, 83815, hereinafter called the "Consultant." RATIFICATION The Idaho Transportation Department, representing the Federal Highway Administration on all local federal-aid highway projects, is authorized to ratify all agreements for engineering services entered into between sponsoring local agencies and their retained consultants. All references to State used hereafter shall denote the Idaho Transportation Department. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: The work covered by this Agreement is for the following project(s): Project Name Project #Key # NHS-7786, 2ND EAST SAFETY IMPRV PH 2, REXBURG A024(611)24611 SUBCONSULTANTS The State approves the Consultant's utilization of the following Subconsultants: TAG Historical Research & Consulting AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATOR This Agreement shall be administered by Brian Wright, Safety Engineer, LHTAC; (208) 344-0565; or an authorized representative. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT A. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The Consultant shall provide professional services as outlined in the attachment(s) and as further described herein. 1. The following attachments are made a part of this Agreement: a. Attachment No. 1L is the Consultant Agreement Specifications which are applicable to all agreements. b. Attachment No. 2 is the negotiated Scope of Work, Cost Estimate, and Man-Day Estimate. In the case of discrepancy, this Agreement shall have precedence over Attachment No. 2, and Attachment No. 2 shall have precedence over Attachment No. 1. 2. Per Diem will be reimbursed at the current approved rates. These rates are listed at http://itd.idaho.gov/business/? target=consultant-agreements . DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SPONSOR AND/OR STATE The Sponsor and/or State shall provide to the Consultant, upon request, copies of any records or data on hand which are pertinent to the work under the Agreement. TIME AND NOTICE TO PROCEED A. The Consultant shall start work under this Agreement no later than ten (10) calendar days from the receipt of the written notice to proceed with the work. The Consultant shall complete all work by 11/30/2027. 11/18/25, 9:58 AM 97414 - Local Professional Services https://intranet/PATS/Reports/LocalProfessionalServicesAgreement/d6a4a1ff-7839-4be0-b849-2d6dba752ae7 1/3 Revised June 2019 Page 1 of 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 1L CONSULTANT AGREEMENT SPECIFICATIONS These specifications supplement Local Professional Services Agreements and shall be attached to said Agreements. A. DEFINITIONS 1. Administrator: Person directly responsible for administering the Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) on behalf of the Local Public Agency. 2. Combined Overhead: The sum of the payroll additives and general administrative overhead expressed as a percent of the direct labor cost. 3. Cost: Cost is the sum of the hourly charge out rate and other direct costs. 4. Cost Plus Fixed Fee: Cost Plus Fixed Fee is the sum of the payroll costs, combined overhead, and other direct costs, plus the fixed fee. 5. CPM: Critical Path Scheduling. The CPM will list work tasks, their durations, milestones and their dates, and State/Local review periods. 6. Fixed Fee: A dollar amount established to cover the Consultant's profit and business expenses not allocable to overhead. The fixed fee is based on a negotiated percent of direct labor cost and combined overhead and shall take into account the size, complexity, duration, and degree of risk involved in the work. The fee is “fixed,” i.e. it does not change. If extra work is authorized, an additional fixed fee can be negotiated, if appropriate. 7. General Administrative Overhead (Indirect Expenses): The allowable overhead (indirect expenses) expressed as a percent of the direct labor cost. 8. Hourly Charge Out Rate: The negotiated hourly rate to be paid to the Consultant which includes all overhead for time worked directly on the project. 9. Incentive/Disincentive Clause: Allows for the increase or decrease of total Agreement amount paid based on factors established in the Agreement. Normally, these factors will be completion time and completion under budget. 10. Lump Sum: An agreed upon total amount, that will constitute full payment for all work described in the Agreement. 11. Milestones: Negotiated portions of projects to be completed within the negotiated time frame. Normally the time frame will be negotiated as a calendar date, but it could also be “working” or “calendar” days. As many milestones as the Consultant and the State/Sponsor believe necessary for the satisfactory completion of the Agreement will be negotiated. 12. Not-To-Exceed Amount: The Agreement amount is considered to be a Not-to-Exceed amount, which amount shall be the maximum amount payable and shall not be exceeded unless adjusted by a Supplemental Agreement. 13. Other Direct Costs: The out-of-pocket costs and expenses directly related to the project that are not a part of the normal company overhead expense. 14. Payroll Additives: All payroll additives allocable to payroll costs such as FICA, State Unemployment Compensation, Federal Unemployment Compensation, Group Insurance, Workmen’s Compensation, Holiday, Vacation, and Sick Leave. The payroll additive is expressed as a percent of the direct labor cost. Revised June 2019 Page 2 of 12 15. Payroll Costs (Direct Labor Cost): The actual salaries paid to personnel for the time worked directly on the project. Payroll costs are referred to as direct labor cost. 16. Per Diem Rates: Per Diem will be reimbursed at actual cost. However, reimbursements shall not exceed the current approved rates. The current rates are listed on the following Web site: http://itd.idaho.gov/business/?target=consultant-agreements . 17. Standard of Care: The level or quality of service ordinarily provided by normally competent practitioners of good standing in that field, contemporaneously providing similar services in the same locality and under the same circumstances. 18. State: Normally “State” refers to the Idaho Transportation Department. 19. Sponsor: The “Sponsor” refers to the local public agency. 20. Unit Prices: The allowable charge out rate for units or items directly related to the project that are not a part of the normal overhead expense. NOTE: All cost accounting procedures, definitions of terms, payroll cost, payroll additives, general administrative overhead, direct cost, and fixed fee shall comply with Federal Acquisition Regulations, 48 CFR, Part 31, and be supported by audit accepted by the State. B. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE Except as otherwise specifically provided for in the Consultant’s Scope of Work, the Consultant agrees that all work performed under the Agreement will be performed in accordance with Idaho Transportation Department Standards and other appropriate standards with generally acceptable standard of care. When the work is of a nature that requires checking, the checking shall be performed by a qualified person other than the one who performed the work. C. AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATOR The Agreement Administrator will administer the Agreement for performance and payment, and will decide all questions which may arise as to quality and acceptability of the work, rate of progress, definition of work to be performed, completion of milestones, and acceptable fulfillment of the Agreement. The Consultant shall address all correspondence, make all requests, and deliver all documents to the Administrator. The Administrator shall be responsible for the timely coordination of all reviews performed by the State or their representatives. D. PERSONNEL The Consultant shall provide adequate staff of experienced personnel or Subconsultants capable of and devoted to the successful accomplishment of work to be performed under the Agreement. The specific individuals or Subconsultants listed in this Agreement, including Project Manager, shall be subject to approval by the State and shall not be removed or replaced without the prior written approval of ITD. Replacement personnel submitted for approval must have qualifications, experience and expertise at least equal to those listed in the proposal. E. SUBCONSULTANTS The Consultant shall have sole responsibility for the management, direction, and control of each Subconsultant and shall be responsible and liable to the Sponsor for the satisfactory performance and quality of work performed by Subconsultants under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Consultant shall include all the applicable terms and conditions of this Agreement in each Subconsultant Agreement between the Consultant and Subconsultant, and provide the State with a copy of each Subconsultant Agreement prior to the Subconsultant beginning work. No other Subconsultant shall be used by the Consultant without prior written consent by the State. Revised June 2019 Page 3 of 12 F. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AUTHORIZATION 1. A written PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AUTHORIZATION (PSA) will be issued by the State to authorize the Consultant to proceed with a specific portion of the work under this Agreement. The number of PSAs required to accomplish all the work under this Agreement is one to several. Each PSA will authorize a maximum dollar amount and specify the milestone(s) for which the PSA represents. The Sponsor assumes no obligation of any kind for expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to the issuance of the PSA; for any expenses incurred by the Consultant for services performed outside the work authorized by the PSA; and for any dollar amount greater than authorized by the PSA. 2. The Consultant’s work of this Agreement will be divided into milestones, each governed by a separate PSA. It is not necessary for a PSA to be completed prior to the issuance of the next PSA. The Consultant shall not perform work which has not been authorized by a PSA. When the money authorized by a PSA is nearly exhausted, the Consultant shall inform the Administrator and shall identify the need for additional authorization via issuance of the next PSA. The Administrator must concur with the Consultant prior to the issuance of the next PSA. 3. The Agreement is lump sum, unit cost, or cost plus fixed fee amount as indicated in this Agreement and may include an Additional Services amount for possible extra work not contemplated in the original scope of work. For the Consultant to receive payment for any work under the Additional Services Amount of this Agreement, said work must be authorized and performed under a PSA issued by the State specifically for the extra work. Should the Sponsor request that the Consultant perform additional services, the scope of work and method of payment will be negotiated. The basis of payment for additional work will be set up either as a Lump Sum or Cost Plus Fixed Fee. G. PROJECT SCHEDULING All negotiated agreements shall be accompanied by a critical path method schedule (CPM Schedule). The CPM Schedule will list the work tasks for the Agreement, their duration, negotiated milestones and their completion dates, including State/Local review periods. The format of this schedule shall be agreed on prior to signing the Agreement. Along with the monthly progress report, the Consultant shall provide monthly CPM Schedule updates to the Agreement Administrator for approval. The CPM schedule shall show project percent completed on each task. H. MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT The Consultant shall submit to the State a monthly progress report on Form ITD-771, as furnished by the State. When no work will be performed for a period of time, this requirement can be waived by written notice from the Agreement Administrator. However, at such time as work re-commences, the monthly progress reports shall resume. The Consultant shall provide monthly progress schedule (CPM) updates to the Agreement Administrator. The monthly progress report and schedule update will be submitted by the tenth of each month following the month being reported or as otherwise agreed to in the approved scope of work. The Agreement Administrator will review the progress report and submit approved invoices for payment within two weeks of receiving the invoice, the associated monthly report and the schedule update. Each progress report shall list invoices by PSA number and reference milestones. I. PROGRESS AND FINAL PAYMENTS 1. Progress payments will be made once a month for services performed which qualify for payment under the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Such payment will be made based on invoices submitted by the Consultant in the format required by the State. The monthly invoice shall be submitted no later than the tenth of each month following the month being invoiced. Revised June 2019 Page 4 of 12 Lump Sum Progress payments will be made based on a percentage of the work or milestones satisfactorily completed. Cost Plus Fixed Fee The Consultant shall submit a breakdown of costs by each item of work on the monthly invoice, and shall show the percent complete of each item of work, each milestone and percent complete of the entire Agreement. Progress payments will be made based on the invoice cost less the fixed fee for the work satisfactorily completed for each invoicing period. Said payment shall not exceed the percent complete of the entire Agreement. Upon satisfactory completion of each milestone, full payment for all approved work performed for that milestone will be made, including Fixed Fee. Cost The Consultant shall submit a breakdown of costs by each item of work on the monthly invoice, and shall show the percent complete of each item of work and percent complete of the entire Agreement. Progress payments will be made based on the invoiced cost for the work satisfactorily completed for each item of work. Said payment shall not exceed the percent complete of the entire Agreement. Direct expenses will be reimbursed at actual cost, not to exceed the current approved rates as identified at http://itd.idaho.gov/business/?target=consultant-agreements . For “Cost Plus Fixed Fee” and “Cost” agreements, invoices must include backup documentation to support expenditures as appropriate, and as requested by the Agreement Administrator. Such support may consist of copies of time sheets or cost accounting system print-out of employee time, and receipts for direct expenses. 2. The Sponsor will make full payment for the value of the services performed which qualify for payment. This full payment will apply until 95 percent of the work under each Project Agreement PSA or Supplemental Agreement has been completed. No further progress payments will be made until all work under the Agreement has been satisfactorily accomplished and accepted by the Sponsor. If at any time, the Sponsor determines that the work is not progressing in a satisfactory manner, further payments may be suspended or withheld for sums that are deemed appropriate for unsatisfactory services. 3. Final payment of all amounts retained shall be due 60 days after all work under the Agreement has been completed by the Consultant and accepted by the Sponsor. Such final payment will not be made until satisfactory evidence by affidavit is submitted to the State that all indebtedness incurred by the Consultant on this project has been fully satisfied. 4. Agreements which include an incentive/disincentive clause will normally have the clause applied only to the completion of the BID OPENING milestone. If the project is deemed by the Sponsor to be ready for advertisement, but advertisement is postponed at no fault of the Consultant, any incentive earned will be paid. 5. Payments to Subconsultants The Consultant shall pay each subconsultant for satisfactory performance of its contract items no later than twenty (20) calendar days from receipt of each payment the Consultant receives from the State under this Agreement, in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 26. The Consultant shall return retainage payments to each subconsultant within twenty (20) calendar days after the subconsultant’s work is satisfactorily completed. The Consultant will verify that payment or retainage has been released to the subconsultant or suppliers within the specified time for each partial payment or partial acceptance by the Department through entries in the Department’s online diversity tracking system during the corresponding monthly audits. Prompt payment will be monitored and enforced through the Consultant’s reporting of monthly payments to its subconsultants and suppliers in the online diversity tracking system. Subconsultants, including lower tier subconsultants, suppliers, or both, will confirm the timeliness and the payment Revised June 2019 Page 5 of 12 amounts received utilizing the online diversity tracking system. Discrepancies will be investigated by the Contract Compliance Officer and the Contract Administrator. Payments to the subconsultants, including lower tier subconsultants, and including retainage release after the subconsultant or lower tier subconsultant’s work has been accepted, will be reported monthly by the Consultant or the subconsultant. The Consultant will ensure its subconsultants, including lower tier subconsultants, and suppliers meet these requirements. J. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES a. The Consultant warrants that they have not: Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration, any firm or person to solicit or secure this Agreement, other than a bona fide employee of the firm; agreed, as an expressed or implied condition for obtaining this Agreement, to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this Agreement, or; paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee of the firm) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the Agreement. b. The Sponsor warrants that the above Consultant or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an expressed or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this Agreement. Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or; pay, or agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST HIRING PERSONNEL AND WORKING FOR CONTRACTOR In compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations, (23 CFR, Section 1.33, Conflict of Interest), the Consultant agrees that no one in their employ will work on a part time basis under this Agreement while also in the full-time employ of any Federal Agency, the State, or the Sponsor, without the written consent of the public employer of such person. The Consultant agrees that no one in their employ under any circumstances shall perform any services for the contractor on the construction of this project. 3. CHANGES IN WORK All changes in work shall conform to one or more of the following conditions and in no instance shall such change in work be undertaken without written order or written approval of the Sponsor. a. Increase in the work required by the Sponsor due to unforeseen circumstances. b. Revision in the work required by the Sponsor subsequent to acceptance of such work at the appropriate conference or after revision of such work as outlined at said conference. c. Items of work which are beyond the scope of intent of this Agreement and pre-approved by the Sponsor. d. Reduction in the work required by the Sponsor due to unforeseen circumstances. An increase in compensation will be considered when Department Design Standards or expectations have changed from the time of negotiation. Adjustment in compensation for either an increase or reduction in work shall be on a negotiated basis arrived at by mutual agreement between the Sponsor and the Consultant. During such Revised June 2019 Page 6 of 12 negotiations the Sponsor may examine the documented payrolls, transportation and subsistence costs paid employees actively engaged in the performance of a similar item or items of work on the project, and by estimated overhead and profit from such similar items or items of work. Said mutual agreement for a negotiated increase or reduction in compensation shall be determined prior to commencement of operations for an increase in a specific item or items of work. In the case of Sponsor order for nonperformance, a reduction in the specific item or items of work will be made as soon as circumstances permit. In the event that a mutual agreement is not reached in negotiations for an increase in work, the Sponsor will use other methods to perform such item or items of work. The mutually agreed amount shall be covered by a Supplemental Agreement and shall be added to or subtracted from the total amount of the original Agreement. Adjustment of time to complete the work as may pertain to an increase or a reduction in the work shall be arrived at by mutual agreement of the Sponsor and the Consultant after study of the change in scope of the work. 4. DELAYS AND EXTENSIONS Time adjustment may occur when the negotiated scope of work is increased or reduced through mutual agreement of the State and the Consultant. Extensions of time may be granted for the following reasons: a) Delays in major portions of the work caused by excessive time used in processing of submittals, delays caused by the State, or other similar items which are beyond the control of the Consultant. b) Additional work ordered in writing by the Sponsor. c) Department Design Standards have changed or expectations have changed from the time of negotiation. 5. TERMINATION The Sponsor may terminate or abandon this Agreement at any time, without further obligation, upon giving notice of termination as hereinafter provided, for any of the following reasons: a. Evidence that progress is being delayed consistently below the progress required in the current approved CPM Schedule. b. Continued submission of sub-standard work. c. Violation of any of the terms or conditions set forth in the Agreement, other than for the reasons set forth in a. and b. above. d. At the convenience of the Sponsor. Prior to giving notice of termination for the reasons set forth in a through c above, the Sponsor shall notify the Consultant in writing of any deficiencies or default in performance of the terms of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have ten (10) days thereafter in which to correct or remedy such default or deficiency. Upon their failure to do so within said ten (10) days, or for the reasons set forth in c above, such notice of termination in writing shall be given by the Sponsor. Upon receipt of said notice the Consultant shall immediately discontinue all work and service unless directed otherwise, and shall transfer all documents pertaining to the work and services covered under this Agreement, to the Sponsor. Upon receipt by the Sponsor of said documents, payment shall be made to Consultant as provided herein for all acceptable work and services. 6. DISPUTES Should any dispute arise as to performance or abnormal conditions affecting the work, such dispute shall be referred to the Sponsor and the Director of the Idaho Transportation Department or his duly authorized representative(s) for determination. Revised June 2019 Page 7 of 12 Such determination shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the decision Consultant files for mediation or arbitration. Consultant agrees that any mediation or arbitration hearing shall be conducted in Boise, Idaho. Consultant and Sponsor agree to be bound by the mediation agreement or the decision of the arbitration. Expenses incurred due to the mediation or arbitration will be shared equally by the Consultant and the Sponsor. 7. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK a. The Consultant represents that all work submitted shall be in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and shall meet tolerances of accuracy required by State practices and procedures. b. Acceptance of work will occur at phases appropriate to the terms of the Agreement and level of detail required by the State in its project development procedures. c. It is understood by the Consultant that the Sponsor is relying upon the professional expertise and ability of the Consultant in performance of the Agreement. Any examination of the Consultant’s work product by the State/Sponsor will not be considered acceptance or approval of the work product which would relieve the Consultant for any liability or expense. Consultant is solely responsible for the propriety and integrity of its work product. Acceptance or approval of any portion of Consultant’s work product by the Sponsor for payment, partial or final, shall not constitute a waiver of any rights the Sponsor may have against the Consultant. If due to errors, omissions and negligent acts by the Consultant, or its Subconsultants, agents or employees, in its work product, the Consultant shall make corrections to its work product at no expense to the Sponsor. The Consultant shall respond to the Sponsor’s notice of any error or omission within twenty-four hours of receipt, and give immediate attention to any corrections to minimize any delay to the construction contract. This may include, if directed by the Sponsor, visits to the site of the work. If the Consultant discovers errors or omissions in its work product, it shall notify the State within seven days of discovery. Failure of the Consultant to notify the State shall be grounds for termination of the Agreement. The Consultant’s liability for damages incurred by the Sponsor due to negligent acts, errors or omissions by the Consultant in its work product shall be borne by the Consultant. Increased construction costs resulting from errors, omissions or negligence in Consultant’s work product shall not be the Consultant’s responsibility unless the additional construction costs were the result of gross negligence of the Consultant. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All material acquired or produced by the Consultant in conjunction with the preparation of the plans, study, or report, shall become the property of, and be delivered to, the Sponsor without restrictions or limitations of their further use. Any use of these materials by the Sponsor for purposes other than intended under this agreement shall be at the risk of the Sponsor. The Consultant has the right to make and retain copies of all data and documents for project files. Documents provided to the State may be public records under the Public Records Act §§ 74-101 through 74-126 and Idaho Code §§ 9- 338 et seq, and thus subject to public disclosure unless excepted by the laws of the state of Idaho, otherwise ordered by the courts of the state of Idaho, and/or otherwise protected by relevant state and/or federal law. 9. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY After aerial photography has been flown, processed and checked for coverage, the negatives shall be sent to the State at the address indicated on the Agreement for evaluation, labeling, and prints or diapositives as needed by the District and the Consultant. The negatives shall become the property of the State. Along with the negatives, the Consultant shall also deliver the Report of Calibration for the aerial camera used for the aerial photography, the flight maps, and the flight log. Once complete, a copy of the mapping shall be placed on a CD-ROM and sent to the address specified in the Agreement. Revised June 2019 Page 8 of 12 10. CADD SPECIFICATIONS Two copies of all drawings shall be furnished to the Department upon completion of the contract. One copy shall be a durable reproduction of the drawing stamped and signed by the Engineer. An electronic stamp is acceptable, provided it is registered and approved with the Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. Roadway plans shall be furnished on 11” x 17” sheets. Structures plans shall be furnished on 22” x 34” sheets. The other copy shall be an electronic drawing file in a MicroStation .DGN file format. Electronic files shall be delivered in one of the following: a. Placed within ITD’s ProjectWise DataSource (See CADD Manual for proper locations for file storage b. Standard CD/DVD-ROM Format Files shall be developed with MicroStation software, SS4 Version 8.11X or higher; or converted to the MicroStation .DGN file format with all conversion errors corrected prior to delivery. If the consultant elects to convert files from other CADD software to the .DGN format, the consultant may be required at various times during the contract period to provide proof that all conversion errors can be corrected. Refer to the CADD Manual for a complete set of CADD Standards. The manual is available at the following website: http://apps.itd.idaho.gov/apps/manuals/manualsonline.html . 11. GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS WORK If geotechnical and materials work is required under this Agreement, the Consultant must ensure that any Subconsultant performing geotechnical and materials work be involved in the final design review. This does not mean that the geotechnical and materials Subconsultant must attend the actual final design review meeting, but does mean that the Subconsultant, will at a minimum, participate in the final design plans and proposal review to assure that all geotechnical and materials recommendations/issues it raised concerning the project have been addressed, or notify the Consultant of any outstanding issues. 12. HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATING PROGRAM The Idaho Transportation Department has adopted the Trns.Port EstimatorTM Highway Construction Cost Estimation software package as the standard for developing all highway construction cost estimates. Consultants who prepare PS&E (Plans, Specifications and Estimate) packages for submittal to ITD are required to use Estimator. Further information is available at the following Web Site: http://itd.idaho.gov/business/?target=consultant-agreements . 13. INDEMNITY a. Concerning claims of third parties, the Consultant shall indemnify, and hold harmless and defend the Sponsor from any and all damages of and against any and all suits, actions, claims or losses of every kind, nature and description, including costs, expenses and reasonable attorney fees that may be incurred by reason of any negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant in the prosecution of the work which is the subject of this Agreement. b. Concerning claims of the Sponsor, the Consultant shall assume the liability and responsibility for negligent acts, errors or omissions caused by the Consultant or a Subconsultant or their agents or employees to the design, preparation of plans and/or specifications, or other assignments completed under this Agreement, to the standards accepted at the time of the Final Design Review, other established review periods. c. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not be responsible for claims arising from the willful misconduct or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the Sponsor for contamination of the project site which pre-exist the date of this Agreement or subsequent Task Authorizations. Pre-existing contamination shall include but not be limited to any contamination or the potential for contamination, or any risk to impairment of health related to the presence of hazardous materials or substances. Revised June 2019 Page 9 of 12 14. INSURANCE The Consultant, certifying it is an independent contractor licensed in the State of Idaho, shall acquire and maintain commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence, professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00, and worker compensation insurance in accordance with Idaho Law. The professional liability insurance coverage shall remain in force and effect for a minimum of one (1) year after acceptance of the construction project by the State (if applicable), otherwise for one (1) year after acceptance of the work by the State. Regarding workers’ compensation insurance, the Consultant must provide either a certificate of workers’ compensation insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to write workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Idaho as evidence that the Consultant has a current Idaho workers’ compensation insurance policy in effect, or an extraterritorial certificate approved by the Idaho Industrial Commission from a state that has a current reciprocity agreement with the Idaho Industrial Commission. The Consultant shall provide the State with certificates of insurance within ten (10) days of the Notice to Proceed. 15. ENDORSEMENT BY ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LAND SURVEYOR, AND GEOLOGIST Where applicable, the Professional Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor, or Geologist in direct charge of the work or portion of work shall endorse the same. All plans, specifications, cost summaries, and reports shall be endorsed with the registration seal, signature, and date of the Idaho professional in direct charge of the work. In addition, the firm's legal name and address shall be clearly stamped or lettered on the tracing of each sheet of the plans. This endorsement certifies design responsibility in conformance with Idaho Code, ITD’s Design Manual, and acceptance of responsibility for all necessary revisions and correction of any errors or omissions in the project plans, specifications and reports relative to the project at no additional cost to the State based on a reasonable understanding of the project at the time of negotiation. 16. LEGAL COMPLIANCE The Consultant at all times shall ,as a professional, observe and comply with all Federal, State and local laws, by-laws, safety laws, and any and all codes, ordinances and regulations affecting the work in any manner and in accordance with the general standard of care. The Consultant agrees that any recourse to legal action pursuant to this agreement shall be brought in the District Court of the State of Idaho, situated in Ada County, Idaho. 17. SUBLETTING The services to be performed under this Agreement shall not be assigned, sublet, or transferred except by written consent of the Sponsor. Written consent to sublet, transfer or assign any portions of the work shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant of any responsibility for the fulfillment of this Agreement or any portion thereof. 18. PERMITS AND LICENSES The Consultant shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges, fees, and taxes and give all notices necessary and incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of the work. 19. PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS The Consultant shall hold and save the Sponsor and its agents harmless from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any patented design, device, material process, trademark, and copyright. Revised June 2019 Page 10 of 12 20. NONDISCRIMINATION ASSURANCES 1050.20 Appendix A: During the performance of work covered by this Agreement, the Consultant for themselves, their assignees and successors in interest agree as follows: 1. Compliance With Regulations. The Consultant shall comply with all regulations of the United States Department of Transportation relative to Civil Rights, with specific reference to Title 49 CFR Part 21, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, and Title 23 CFR Part 230 as stated in the ITD EEO Special Provisions and Title 49 CFR Part 26 as stated in the appropriate ITD DBE Special Provisions. http://apps.itd.idaho.gov/apps/ocr/index.aspx 2. Nondiscrimination. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by them during the term of this Agreement, shall not in any way discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment; subcontractor or solicitations for subcontract including procurement of materials and equipment; or any other individual or firm providing or proposing services based on race, color, sex, national origin, age, disability, limited English proficiency or economic status. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations, either by bidding or negotiation, made by the Consultant for work or services performed under subcontract, including procurement of materials and equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be made aware by the Consultant of the obligations of this Agreement and to the Civil Rights requirements based on race, color, sex, national origin, age, disability, limited English proficiency or economic status. 4. Information and Reports. The Consultant shall provide all information and reports required by regulations and/or directives and sources of information, and their facilities as may be determined by the State or the appropriate Federal Agency. The Consultant will be required to retain all records for a period of three (3) years after the final payment is made under the Agreement. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event the Consultant or a Subconsultant is in noncompliance with the EEO Special Provisions, the State shall impose such sanctions as it or the appropriate Federal Agency may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:  Withholding of payments to the Consultant until they have achieved compliance;  Suspension of the agreement, in whole or in part, until the Consultant or Subconsultant is found to be in compliance, with no progress payment being made during this time and no time extension made;  Cancellation, termination or suspension of the Agreement, in whole or in part;  Assess against the Consultant’s final payment on this Agreement or any progress payments on current or future Idaho Federal-aid Projects an administrative remedy by reducing the final payment or future progress payments in an amount equal to 10% of this agreement or $7,700, whichever is less. 6. Incorporation of Provisions. The Consultant will include the provisions of paragraphs 1 through 5 above in every subcontract of $10,000 or more, to include procurement of materials and leases of equipment unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives pursuant thereto. The Consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the State or the appropriate Federal Agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Consultant may request the State to enter into any litigation to protect the interest of the State.In addition, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States. Revised June 2019 Page 11 of 12 1050.20 Appendix E During the performance of this contract, the Consultant, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees to comply with all non- discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to: Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21. • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); • Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex); • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); • Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, ( 49 USC § 4 71, Section 4 7123 ), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); • Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; • The Federal Aviation Administration's Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); • Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; • Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100); • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U .S.C. 1681 et seq). 21. INSPECTION OF COST RECORDS The Consultant shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred on the project. They shall make such data available for inspection, and audit, by duly authorized personnel, at reasonable times during the life of this Agreement, and for a period of three (3) years subsequent to date of final payment under this Agreement, unless an audit has been announced or is underway; in that instance, records must be maintained until the audit is completed and any findings have been resolved. Failure to provide access to records may affect payment and may constitute a breach of contract. Revised June 2019 Page 12 of 12 22. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS By signing this document the Consultant certifies to the best of his knowledge and belief that except as noted on an attached Exception, the company or its subcontractors, material suppliers, vendors or other lower tier participants on this project: a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; b. have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification; and d. have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. NOTE: Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of award, but will be considered in determining Consultant responsibility. For any exception noted, indicate to whom it applies, initiating agency and dates of action. Providing false information may result in criminal prosecution or administrative sanctions. 23. CERTIFICATION CONCERNING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES By signing this document, the Consultant certifies to the best of their knowledge and belief that: a. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. b. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. The Consultant also agrees that he or she shall require that the language of this certification shall be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000, and that all such sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 24. EMPLOYEE ELIGIBILITY The Consultant warrants and takes the steps to verify that it does not knowingly hire or engage persons not authorized to work in the United States; and that any misrepresentation in this regard or any employment of person not authorized to work in the United States constitutes a material breach and shall be cause for the imposition of monetary penalties up to five percent (5%) of the contract price, per violation, and/or termination of its contract. KN 24611 – SOW Page 1 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK 2nd East Safety Improvements Phase 2 KN 24611, Project No. A024(611) August 12, 2025 Project Scope The City of Rexburg (the City of Rexburg) has been awarded Federal-aid through the Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (LHSIP) administered by the Local Highway Technical Assistance Council (LHTAC). This LHSIP project will widen 15 feet of the roadway on the east side of 2nd East for approximately 1,300 feet starting at the Christensen Body Shop and ending just north of the Eastern Idaho Railroad. The widening will accommodate five (5) lanes to match the existing roadway to the north. The new roadway section will include four (4) travel lanes, a two way left turn lane and curb, gutter and sidewalk on each side of the road. Existing infrastructure, such as the sidewalk adjacent to the Madison Armory, will be incorporated into the newly designed roadway section. The widened roadway will be chip sealed, and new pavement markings will be applied over the chip sealed surface. Drainage from the new roadway surface will be collected in curb inlets and conveyed into infiltration chambers or swales. In addition to roadway and pedestrian improvements, illumination will be provided to increase visibility for the traveling public. Lighting will be installed in critical locations at an approximate spacing of 400 feet between luminaires, while taking in Right-of-Way restrictions and overhead power conflicts. The proposed improvements will not require right-of-way acquisition from private property owners. The scope of work will include project administration, preliminary design, final design, and PS&E submittals, traffic control plans, and surveying for the above referenced Federal‐aid LHSIP projects. Utility and coordination will be required. LHTAC will also require support from the consultant to prepare the Project Charter and Environmental Documents, at the appropriate level. This project will be developed using the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) Roadway Design Manual, guidance from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), English units, KN 24611 – SOW Page 2 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 and is scoped as Federal Aid Simple. All project documentation will reference and use 2023 ITD Standard Specifications for Highway Construction for the entirety of the project. Project Milestones Anticipated Completion Dates* Survey September 15, 2025 Cultural Resources January 26, 2026 Preliminary Design and Submittal January 26, 2026 Roadway Materials Report Approval February 9, 2026 Environmental Evaluation Approval April 28, 2026 Final Design Submittal June 25, 2026 PS&E Submittal September 28, 2026 *Based on a Notice to Proceed of September 2, 2025 Task 1 – Project Coordination and Management 1.1 General Administration This will consist of the daily management of the project and involve administrative tasks of a general nature that are required of the Consultant during the course of project development, including setting up and maintaining project accounting procedures, monitoring project budget, and general project coordination. Once all deliverables are complete, the Consultant will conduct an internal project closeout. 1.2 Pre-Operation Meeting Consultant will facilitate the Pre-Operation Conference including forms and exhibits provided by or coordinated with LHTAC. The Pre-Operation Meeting will include a Site Visit. Performance Assumptions: • Coordinate and perform the conference with the LHTAC, City of Rexburg, Sub-consultant, and other applicable parties. • 3 staff members from HMH, Project Manager, Lead Designer, and Quality Control Engineer, will visit the project site to photo-document existing conditions and to become familiar with the project area. Field notes will be completed for the project file. The site visit is assumed to last 6 hours, including travel time. • Prepare and distribute meeting minutes. 1.3 LHTAC Billing Coordination Invoices will be submitted monthly via email in PDF format. For estimating purposes, we have assumed a total of 13 invoices. The Consultant will coordinate billing with each subconsultant KN 24611 – SOW Page 3 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 throughout the contract. Subconsultant payments will be included in the Consultant’s billing. Invoices will include the following: • Cover letter • Invoice summary sheet • Progress Report, ITD 0771 • PSA and Invoice Summary, ITD-2761 • B2G entries • Backup for time and expenses 1.4 LHTAC Coordination & Meetings The HMH Project Manager will correspond regularly with the LHTAC Agreement Administrator and staff. In addition, regular progress meetings and internal team meetings will be scheduled. HMH will prepare and distribute an agenda for the progress meetings via email at least 1 day in advance of the meetings. Planned meetings other than design review meetings include: • Up to 2 progress meetings will be held throughout the duration of the project with LHTAC. For estimating purposes, meetings will be 1 to 2 hours in duration and two HMH staff will attend. Meeting notes will be compiled and distributed by HMH via email within 2 days of the meeting. • Internal team meetings will be held on an approximately monthly basis. Meetings will be approximately 1 hour and will include all HMH staff actively involved in project design and one senior QC Engineering staff member. Meeting notes will be compiled by HMH and held internally. 1.5 Agreement Closeout Upon completion of the project, HMH will work with the LHTAC Agreement Administrator to conduct Agreement Closeout tasks including: • Issuance of a final ITD 0771, Professional Agreement Progress Report; • Issuance of ITD 0060, Certification of Indebtedness; • ITD 2759, Consultant Services Performance Evaluation (submitted to the Consultant from LHTAC). Task 2 Surveying and Mapping HMH will provide survey control, topographical surveying, monument preservation, boundary, and right of way research required to complete this task. The purpose of this task is to develop a base map at an accuracy that is suitable for final design plans and to support other project tasks. Elements to be incorporated into this base map will be existing surface features such as KN 24611 – SOW Page 4 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 pavement, culverts, signs, contours, utilities and existing monuments in the project limits. Assumptions have been shown under each subtask. 2.1 Survey Access and Kickoff Meeting 2.1.1 Prepare and Mail Access Notification After review and approval by LHTAC, HMH will prepare and have the City of Rexburg send notification letters to the area property owners informing them of the pending survey, geotechnical, environmental, and other pertinent field activities 7 days prior to field work. Deliverables: • Right of entry letters (Word and PDF) 2.1.2 Survey Kickoff Meeting The HMH survey team and project manager will hold an internal coordination meeting to confirm the survey needs for the project. 2.2 Project Control Network HMH will establish a horizontal and vertical control network for the project through the site as necessary to support mapping activities and to have one project control points elevated as benchmarks on each plan sheet as required in the ITD Design Manual Section 855.00. The following items will be accomplished by HMH as part of this Primary Control Network task: 2.2.1 Research Existing Federal Control Monuments Research National Geodetic Survey (NGS) control monument database and the Bureau of Reclamation records to determine nearby control monuments. Any monuments that are found and are identified to be destroyed as part of the construction will be noted in the plans. 2.2.2 Primary Control Network HMH will utilize Static GPS surveying and the NGS Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) and NGS Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) to establish a primary control network throughout the project corridor. Horizontal Coordinates will be referenced to the NAD83 (2011) datum, Idaho State Plane-East Zone (1101) as brought to ground, from the origin point (0,0) of the State Plane Zone, utilizing a combined scale factor at the site. A combined scale factor will be shown for any future translations. Elevations will be based on the NAVD88 vertical datum utilizing Geoid 18 and shown in US Survey Feet. All coordinates and distances shown will be ground values in US Survey Feet. Primary control monuments will be placed along the corridor as needed. New primary control points will be monumented with aluminum KN 24611 – SOW Page 5 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 caps. NGS monuments in the project area will be utilized in our control network to verify horizontal positions and vertical elevations, if available. 2.2.3 Secondary Control Control points and benchmarks will be set as necessary throughout the project area. HMH will verify the vertical control with GNSS observations with long term and redundant observations and/or total station verification. 2.2.4 Survey Control Sheet HMH will prepare the survey control sheet to show all found and set control for the project to be included in the design plans. Deliverables: • PLS Stamped Survey Control Sheet (PDF) and Right-of-Way line-work (project area only) 2.3 Right of Way Research and Verification HMH surveyors will search for right of way monuments, property corner monuments and United States Public Land Survey System (PLSS) monuments as needed in the project area. The construction drawings will show any monuments found per Idaho Code (IC) 55-1613. 2.3.1 Research County Records for Recorded Surveys and Plats HMH will research related documents to determine the locations of the existing right of way monuments for the project limits defined later in this scope. HMH will also research any monuments that exist within the new project limits per Idaho Code (IC) 55-1613: “The physical existence and location of the monuments of property controlling corners and accessories to corners, as well as benchmarks established, and points set in control surveys by agencies of the United States government or the State of Idaho.” Records to be researched include: • Record of Surveys-Madison County, ID • National Geodetic Survey data sheets • Subdivision Plats-Madison County, ID • Deeds of Record-Madison County, ID. • CP&F Records-State of Idaho. 2.3.2 Monument Preservation HMH will create search locations and identify any monuments defining the right-of-way and any other monuments within the construction zone that may be lost due to construction. 2.4 Field Survey/Topographic Surveying HMH will perform the topographic field surveying of the project corridor to the just or just beyond the right-of-way line. The topographic survey is bounded on the north by the Christensen Auto Body shop, and on the south by the northerly right-of-way of the Eastern Idaho Railroad. Existing features to be captured in the field survey, but not limited to, include KN 24611 – SOW Page 6 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 pavement, sidewalk, grade breaks, signs, utilities, and any other improvements relative to and the addition of lanes, sidewalk and development of a sediment and erosion plan will be mapped. 2.4.1 Utility Locates HMH will contact Idaho One Call-811 to mark utilities existing within the project area. It is assumed that a private locating service will mark the lines within the project area and that these lines can be recovered by HMH survey crews. If possible, HMH will obtain any use existing mapping of utilities to assist in the location of the relevant underground utilities as part of the topographic survey. 2.4.2 Process Field Data and Linework HMH will process the field data and linework from the control network and import the data into the design Software. HMH will process the field data and linework with quality control, quality assurance checks verify accuracy and validity to ITD standards. 2.4.3 Develop Project Base Map HMH will compile mapping data acquired and developed in the preceding tasks into a project base map. One-foot contours will be developed as needed for design plans from the mapping data. Deliverables: • An electronic drawing showing the existing conditions and digital terrain model will be produced in Autodesk Civil 3d and CAD base map. Task 3 Project Charter 3.1 Design Criteria Matrix A Design Criteria Matrix (DCM) will be developed prior to beginning design activities. The DCM will list pertinent design criteria and design thresholds according to the agency guidelines. 3.2 Project Charter Update HMH will review the current Project Charter and provide revisions to the LHTAC Project Manager via a Charter Update Memo. Assumptions: • LHTAC will update the Project Charter Task 4 Preliminary Design 4.1 Preliminary Design Plans The HMH team will prepare the preliminary design plans based on the approved charter. The preliminary design plans will be developed in accordance with the ITD Design Manual. The KN 24611 – SOW Page 7 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 following design drawings are anticipated and will be included in the design submittal package as noted below: Sheet Group # Sheets Preliminary Final/PS&E Title Sheet 1 x x Survey Control Map (1"=100') 5 x Project Clearance Summary 1 x Typical Sections 2 x x Roadway Summary 1 x Plan & Profile Sheets (1"=50') 3 x x Illumination Plan Sheets 3 x x Approach and Detail Sheets 2 x Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (1"=50') 3 x Sign Erection Table 1 x Sign Details 1 x Signing and Pavement Marking Plans (1"=50') 3 x x Traffic Control Summary 1 x Traffic Control Plans 3 x Traffic Control Details 1 x Total # of Sheets = 12 31 4.1.1 Preliminary Typical Sections HMH will prepare typical sections for the project with 2-4 typical sections on each sheet. HMH will utilize tables to handle varying conditions where it is logical to limit the number of sections. 4.1.2 Preliminary Roadway Plan HMH will establish the preliminary design of the roadway elements of the project, including horizontal alignment, profile grade, and typical section. HMH team will evaluate the roadway design, public road approach connections, and critical private driveway approaches. Bid items may not be fully noted on the preliminary plan sheets. This task also includes preparing cross-sections at 100-foot intervals. 4.1.3 Preliminary Illumination Plan HMH will establish the preliminary design of illumination along the roadway corridor. 4.1.4 Preliminary Utility Coordination and Plans HMH will determine through the One Call process which utilities exist within the project area. HMH will then prepare a letter for each utility company requesting utility mapping within the project area. HMH will use the maps to assist with field locates as part of their topographic survey effort. HMH will develop preliminary utility plans based on HMH’s survey. 4.2 Preliminary Roadway Quantities and Cost Estimate HMH will calculate bid quantities based on the preliminary design. Pavement section quantities will be calculated from the typical sections. Independent computations of all quantities will be KN 24611 – SOW Page 8 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 performed by 2 staff members and will be cross-checked for consistency prior to finalizing quantities. HMH will estimate unit costs for the work items using the AASHTOWARE Estimation computer program to develop the opinion of probable construction cost. 4.3 Preliminary Plan QA/QC A senior level HMH engineer not involved with the design and checking process, will perform a quality control review of the preliminary design plans, specifications, and estimate. QA/QC comments will be incorporated before the preliminary design package is submitted. 4.4 Preliminary Design Submittal The HMH team will assemble and submit preliminary plans, special provisions, and cost estimate for review in an over the shoulder review by LHTAC. Only an electronic copy will be provided for review. Deliverables: • Preliminary Design Plans (11”x17”) • Preliminary Cost Estimate • Roadway cross sections at 100-foot intervals to demonstrate design accuracy and extents of roadway cut and fill slopes • Preliminary Special Provisions 4.5 Preliminary Review Responses HMH will review and respond to LHTAC’s over-the-shoulder preliminary design review. Assumptions: • Owner’s review of preliminary design submittal will be an over-the-shoulder review. • HMH will document the resolution to the comments based on discussions at the review meeting on the comment review form. Deliverables: • Responses to design review comments, in electronic format. Task 5 Final Design HMH will prepare the final design plans once the preliminary design plans have been reviewed. No significant redesign of the preliminary roadway is anticipated at final design. Changes will KN 24611 – SOW Page 9 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 include adjustments to the proposed plans to address preliminary design review comments. Please refer to the sheet count table in Section 4.1. 5.1 Final Title Sheet HMH will prepare a Title Sheet in accordance with ITD’s Design Manual. 5.1.1 Survey Control Map HMH will develop a Survey Control Map showing monuments found and set along the project, coordinates, and basis of bearing. 5.1.2 Project Clearance Summary Sheet HMH will develop the project clearance summary sheet for final design. 5.1.3 Final Typical Sections HMH will finalize the typical sections that were developed as part of the Preliminary Design tasks. Adjustments to the typical sections will be based on comments received and updates to the design. 5.1.4 Roadway Summary HMH will identify bid items, calculate quantities, and prepare the Roadway Summary necessary to report bid quantities related to the roadway on a sheet-by-sheet basis. 5.1.5 Final Roadway Plan Sheets The Roadway Plan Sheets that were developed in preliminary design will be finalized. This will include calling out bid items, finalizing modeling and earthwork design, and preparing the plans for construction. 5.1.6 Final Illumination Plan Sheets The Illumination Plan Sheets that were developed in preliminary design will be finalized. This will include calling out bid items, finalizing layout and details, and preparing the plans for construction. 5.1.7 Final Detail Sheets Detail sheets from preliminary design will be finalized. Additional detail sheets developed in the final design process will be added. 5.1.8 Pollution Prevention Plans (PPP) It is anticipated that the project will not disturb more than one acre and has the potential of construction stormwater discharges reaching US Waters. PPP plan sheets will be prepared to show minimum erosion and sediment control measures contemplated for the project. This task KN 24611 – SOW Page 10 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 also includes completion of portions of the PPP narrative template for inclusion in the project Proposal. 5.1.9 Final Signing and Pavement Markings Plans HMH will finalize signing and pavement marking plans. HMH will summarize the signs on a sign erection specification sheet and provide details for non-standard signs. 5.1.10 Final Traffic Control Plans HMH will finalize traffic control plans and finalize the traffic control detail sheets. 5.1.11 Final Utility Coordination and Plans HMH will identify utilities that need to be retained and protected. Utilities to be relocated will be shown on the plans. The final utility plans showing relocation of utilities will be sent to each affected company for confirmation of the relocated position. One set of revisions to the Utility plans is anticipated. Additionally, Utility Hearing Waivers will be prepared and sent to utility companies. It is anticipated that utility agreements will not be required on this project. 5.2 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost HMH will update the preliminary opinion of probable construction cost using the AASHTOWare Estimation computer program to reflect final bid items and quantities. 5.3 Special Provisions HMH will finalize the Special Provisions developed during preliminary design including addressing review comments. 5.4 Contract Time Determination HMH will determine the approximate construction contract time based on ITD’s Contract Time Determination in Project Development in Microsoft Project. Assumptions: • Contract time for major work activities will be based on ITD published production rates. Deliverables: • Project schedule, prepared using Microsoft Project 5.5 Final Plan QA/QC Senior-level engineers from HMH not involved with the design and checking process will perform a quality control review of the final design plans. Tasks include an overall review of the KN 24611 – SOW Page 11 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 plans, construction cost estimate, special provisions, and review for consistency. QA/QC comments will be incorporated before plans are submitted for review. 5.6 Final Plan Submittal HMH will assemble and submit final construction documents for review by LHTAC. Only an electronic copy will submitted for review. Deliverables: • Final Design Plans (11”x17”) • Pollution Prevention Plan ITD-2788 • Minimum Testing Requirements (MTR) • Final Cost Estimate • Final Special Provisions • Construction Schedule • Final Design Checklist • Final Plan Sheet Checklist 5.7 Final Review Responses and Meeting The review comments will be consolidated by LHTAC and provided to HMH prior to the design review meeting. Two HMH staff members will attend the review meeting to clarify and discuss review comments. Assumptions: • Review of final design submittal will take up to 15 working days. • One review meeting will be held with all required reviewers in attendance to resolve outstanding comments or issues. • The resolution for the comments requiring further discussion will be determined during the review meeting. • HMH will document the resolution to the comments based on discussions at the review meeting on the comment review form. Deliverables: • Responses to final design review comments (PDF) Task 6 PS&E Submittal HMH will revise the final design plans, special provisions, estimate of contract time and opinion of probable construction cost per the Final Design Review comments. Significant changes to the KN 24611 – SOW Page 12 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 design requiring re-design efforts are not anticipated and not included in this scope. A PS&E package will be submitted. 6.1 Plan Revisions HMH team will incorporate review comments from the final design review. 6.2 Quantity and Estimate Revisions HMH will incorporate review comments to the final quantities and estimate. 6.3 Special Provision Revisions HMH will incorporate review comments and update the contractor notes and special provisions. 6.4 Constructions Schedule Revisions HMH will incorporate review comments to the Engineer’s construction schedule. 6.5 PPP Changes HMH will incorporate review comments revisions to the PPP, ITD-2788 template per final design review comments. 6.6 Resident Engineer’s File HMH will prepare a resident engineer’s file for the project, including quantity takeoff for major bid items. 6.7 PS&E QA/QC Review HMH will perform an independent review of the draft bidding documents by a senior level engineer not involved with the design and checking process. Senior review comments will be incorporated before the PS&E package is submitted to LHTAC. 6.8 Submit Draft PS&E Package HMH will assemble and submit the contract documents, resident engineer’s file, and other PS&E documents to LHTAC after addressing Final Design review comments and performing a QA/QC Review. LHTAC will provide comments on the Draft PS&E Package. 6.9 Submit Final PS&E Package HMH will assemble and submit the contract documents, resident engineer’s file, and other PS&E documents to LHTAC after addressing Draft PS&E review comments and performing a QA/QC Review. Assumptions: • No PS&E review meeting is required • LHTAC will confirm that final design review comments have been incorporated to their satisfaction. Deliverables: • PS&E Plans (11” x17”): o Electronic files (PDF format and CAD files in DGN format) o Signed & sealed electronic roadway plans (PDF) • PS&E Special Provisions prepared in Microsoft Word • PS&E Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (PDF electronically stored in AASHTOWare Estimation) KN 24611 – SOW Page 13 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 • Construction Schedule in Microsoft Project (MPP and PDF) • Minimum Testing Requirements (MTR) • Pollution Prevention Plan ITD-2788 (Word Format) • PS&E Checklists and Non-bid item spreadsheet (PDF) 6.10 Bidding Services HMH will respond in writing to questions from contractors received by LHTAC during the bidding phase. Assumptions: • Up to 5 questions will be answered during the bidding process. For purposes of determining level of effort, the questions are assumed to take no more than one (1) hour each to answer. • All contractor questions will come from LHTAC to HMH; all answers to questions will go back through LHTAC to contractors. HMH will have no direct contact with bidders. • All questions will be answered in writing via email. • Up to one addendum may be issued involving plan changes by HMH. Task 7 Environmental Evaluation HMH will perform the Environmental Clearance for the project and will assist TAG with performing the Cultural Clearance. HMH will collaborate with LHTAC and ITD to complete all necessary forms including ITD-1500 (LHTAC), ITD-1502 (ITD), and ITD-0654. Below are assumptions to guide the environmental documentation scope of work for this project. 1. An Environmental Evaluation (EE) (ITD-0654) will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE). If the NEPA CE process determines a document other than that identified is appropriate, then changes to the scope of work and/or scope of work activity(s) shall be identified and negotiated to accomplish the final required environmental documentation level. There will not be any alternatives carried forward as this document has been identified as a CE. 2. HMH will designate the Area of Potential Effects (APE), which will encompass all anticipated construction areas, staging locations, and temporary access. 3. Waste sites and materials source sites will not be cleared by the consultant. 4. Should any additional studies become necessary, these can be performed as Additional Services. 7.1 Project Coordination (HMH/TAG) This task includes all efforts to complete the project regarding project administration, such as project initiation, project management, project scheduling, monthly progress meetings and/or reports, and invoicing. HMH will provide TAG typical sections and vicinity maps for cultural resource documentation. 7.2 Cultural Resources This work will be conducted by the Principal Investigator and will be in accordance with KN 24611 – SOW Page 14 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), NEPA, and other pertinent regulations. The Archaeological and Historic Survey Report (AHSR) will follow the 2024 Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) standards and format, and shall include background research, field survey, and preparation of the report. The AHSR shall include discussions of field methods, survey results, and maps showing areas surveyed. The survey will be intensive. Waste sites, staging areas, materials source sites, etc. shall be included in the report if they are identified. Consultant will provide sufficient information to prepare Determinations of Significance and Effect (ITD 1502) by ITD’s Highway Archaeologist for submittal to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). A. Project Coordination. TAG staff, at times, may need to coordinate with ITD and various other interested parties. Once the project is under contract, TAG shall contact ITD Cultural Resources Staff to discuss the applicable field techniques with the Highway Archaeologist and/or Architectural Historian to determine the appropriate methodology. TAG will set up the project in the Idaho Cultural Resource Information System (ICRIS) adopted by SHPO January 25, 2024. B. Research. Database checks at the Idaho SHPO are required for previous survey and known sites within one-half mile of the linear project area. A literature review will be conducted in ICRIS, and additional research may be conducted at the SHPO, Idaho State Archives, National Register, county historical society, and the county assessor. C. Fieldwork. Applicable field investigation techniques shall be discussed with ITD Highway Archaeologist/Architectural Historian to determine the appropriate methodology. Project leaders will provide a full project description including measurements and figures that show all proposed areas of ground disturbing activities. This will include all proposed excavation, staging, material storage, and any other area that has potential for ground disturbance. The project will be surveyed using intensive survey methods using pedestrian transects spaced no more than 30 meters apart but may be spaced closer depending on the environmental conditions. The field survey will follow Idaho SHPO, and Archaeological Survey of Idaho (ASI) guidelines. Private property owner information will be provided by HMH to TAG. D. Site Forms. Given the known pre-contact and historic land use of the area, up to five cultural resources will be recorded under this scope of work. These sites will be fully documented to provide data on location, dimensions, content age, context and integrity for an assessment of National Register of Historic Places eligibility. Depending on the type of cultural resources identified, the sites will either be recorded in ICRIS as historic or archaeological resources. E. Cultural Resource Survey Report. The AHSR will follow Idaho SHPO, and ASI guidelines. The report will follow the 2024 Idaho ITD standards and format and will include research, field survey methods, survey results, findings (including site condition and eligibility), potential project effects, recommendations, maps, photos, and appropriate site forms. Resources, which are noted, but not considered sites will be discussed in the AHSR rather than recorded on separate site forms. All Noted but Not Recorded (NBNR) resources will be photographed, plotted on a map, and listed in a table within the report. TAG shall KN 24611 – SOW Page 15 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 address all comments, if any, received by HMH, the City of Rexburg/LHTAC, ITD, and SHPO and revise and resubmit as needed. F. Technical Review QA/QC. Prior to submitting any cultural resource documents, internal Quality Assurance and Quality Control shall be completed by TAG cultural resource staff. G. Comment Response. The draft report will be submitted to HMH and the City of Rexburg/LHTAC, who will submit to ITD Headquarters for review. Comments will be addressed. Following their review of the report, the revised report will be submitted through ICRIS to SHPO for review and concurrence. Following HMH and the City of Rexburg/LHTAC review of the cultural resource report, the ITD cultural resource staff and SHPO are each allowed 30-day reviews. Should any agency staff require report edits or revisions of the project area, the review cycle for each is renewed at the time of the submitted report changes. ASSUMPTIONS: • Waste sites and materials source sites will not be provided to the consultant. DELIVERABLES: • Draft AHSR for HMH and the City of Rexburg/LHTAC • Draft AHSR for ITD Headquarters review • Final AHSR 7.3 Environmental Evaluation All work necessary to complete an EE will be conducted and includes the following: • State location map & project vicinity sketch. • Purpose & need, project, and termini/limits descriptions. Include the purpose & need descriptions, project description and project termini/limits from the approved project charter. Revise the descriptions in consultation with LHTAC and ITD as needed or directed. • Project area photographs. • EE Narrative. Included are the required summaries and reports for all items per the ITD 0654 EE, as applicable. • Environmental Mitigation Summary. Prepare an environmental mitigation summary that is complete, accurate, and reflects all mitigation as approved by ITD and applicable resource agencies. • Public Involvement Summary. Prepare a public involvement summary for all public involvement that has been completed. Reference the project Public Involvement Plan provided by ITD. • Correspondence and Support Documentation. Assemble appropriate correspondence and/or support documentation. Group by ITD 0654 item number and arranged by date, with the most current on top. • EE. Prepare and assemble an EE, participate in a review meeting including preparation of meeting minutes & action item list, and complete all revisions necessary to complete an acceptable document. KN 24611 – SOW Page 16 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 Technical Review QA/QC. Prior to submitting the EE, internal QA/QC shall be completed by HMH staff. Comment Response. The draft EE will be submitted to LHTAC, ITD HQ, and FHWA for review. Comments will be addressed, and the revised report will be resubmitted for review and concurrence. Should either agency staff require report edits or revisions of the project area, the review cycle for each is renewed at the time of the submitted report changes. DELIVERABLES: • Draft Environmental Evaluation o ITD Forms  0654: Environmental Evaluation  2101: CE Determination  2215: Biological Evaluation (if applicable)  ITD Form 2225: Wetlands/WOTUS Evaluation (to be delivered as part of the ARDR outlined in section 7.3.2)  ITD-2226 Hazardous Materials Evaluation Form (to be delivered as part of the Hazardous Materials section 7.3.7) • Final Environmental Evaluation o ITD Forms  0654: Environmental Evaluation  2101: CE Determination  2215: Biological Evaluation (if applicable)  ITD Form 2225: Wetlands/WOTUS Evaluation (to be delivered as part of the ARDR outlined in section 7.3.2)  ITD-2226 Hazardous Materials Evaluation Form (to be delivered as part of the Hazardous Materials section 7.3.7) 7.3.1 Section 4(f) Evaluation It is assumed this task is not warranted. If deemed necessary, this task can be completed as Additional Services. 7.3.2 Aquatic Resource Delineation It is assumed that this task is not warranted due to lack of aquatic resources in the project vicinity. If deemed necessary, HMH can add these services as a supplemental agreement. 7.3.3 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species A. Background Research: HMH will gather all pertinent information regarding the proposed project action and species of concern known to occur near the project area. Information collected during the background review will be used to assess the impacts that the proposed improvements will have on T&E species and species of concern. B. Field Reconnaissance: If determined necessary by LHTAC, HMH will perform a field reconnaissance visit to identify T&E species and candidate species and identify habitat and potential impacts for the proposed actions. Photos of the project area will be taken on the day that the reconnaissance visit is conducted. If habitats or plants are identified, KN 24611 – SOW Page 17 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 this will precipitate a higher level of documentation and additional documentation which is not included in this scope of work. C. No Effect Statement for T&E Species: HMH will document the proposed project will not impact any Federally listed and proposed species that occur near the project area. An updated T&E species list will be obtained every six months through the duration of the environmental document preparation and/or until just prior to construction. If there are additions or changes to the updated species list which have not been addressed previously, the additions or changes to affected species will be addressed as necessary. Up to three (3) updates will be assumed. D. Other Fisheries, Wildlife, and Plants Report. A list of all species that occur within the vicinity of the project area will be obtained from the IDFG using the IFWIS. HMH will determine potential impacts that the proposed projects will have on species of concern that occur in the project vicinity. This section will also address Federally protected species listed under documents other than the Endangered Species Act (ESA), such as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), if applicable. E. Coordination and Consultation: HMH will consult with the applicable agencies (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFS), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), as necessary) regarding this project and its potential impacts to threatened, endangered, and candidate species as well as species of concern. F. Summary in Environmental Evaluation. HMH will summarize information collected for inclusion in the EE. 7.3.4 Noise It is assumed noise analysis is not warranted. HMH can add these services as a supplemental agreement if required. 7.3.5 Air Quality It is assumed that air quality analysis is not warranted. HMH can add these services as a supplemental agreement if required. 7.3.6 Visual Resources It is assumed that a visual resources analysis is not warranted. HMH can add these services as a supplemental agreement if required. 7.3.7 Hazardous Materials Conduct an Administrative Review, including review of public records as available (e.g. aerial photographs). All work shall be documented according to current ITD/FHWA guidelines. After completion of an Administrative Review, complete and submit the ITD-0652 Form. The ITD-0652 Form shall include a conclusion as to the potential the project has of encountering hazardous materials. If an Initial Site Assessment (ISA Phase I) is necessary, this can be provided under a supplemental agreement. DELIVERABLES: • Complete Hazardous Materials Sheet and Resource Map KN 24611 – SOW Page 18 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 • ITD-2226 Hazardous Materials Evaluation Form 7.3.8 Hydrology Evaluate the potential impacts to surface water, water quality, floodplains, ground water, stream alteration/encroachment, and navigable waters. A. Water Quality: Evaluate whether the project will impact water quality, particularly in proximity to sensitive water resources such as streams, rivers, wetlands, groundwater recharge zones, or drinking water sources. Consider potential impacts from stormwater runoff, sediment transport, erosion, and other non-point source pollutants. Identification of nearby surface water features—including ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams—will be included. If impacts are anticipated, they will be summarized in the EE, including discussion of potential mitigation strategies. If the project discharges to Waters of the United States (WOTUS) or state waters, coordination and permitting under the Clean Water Act (CWA) may be required: • Section 404 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) for discharge of dredge or fill material into jurisdictional waters or wetlands. • Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Idaho Department of Environmental Quality) for projects requiring Section 404 authorization. B. Floodplains and Floodways: Conduct a preliminary investigation into potential impacts to floodplains and floodways. Review the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and any existing floodplain studies to determine the project’s location relative to 100-year floodplains, designated floodways, and Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Identify any potential encroachment and evaluate options to avoid or minimize floodplain impacts. Impacts to base flood elevation, flood storage, or conveyance capacity will be noted. A detailed floodplain analysis will not be completed under this scope of work but may be added as an additional service if required. HMH will coordinate with local floodplain administrators and permitting authorities as necessary. C. Stream Alteration: If the project will result in the modification of a stream channel, bank, or bed—whether for culvert replacement, bridge work, or drainage improvements—a Stream Channel Alteration Permit (SCAP) may be required from the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR). D. Navigable Waters: For any work involving waterways that may be classified as navigable under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and possibly the U.S. Coast Guard will be required. This includes potential impacts to navigable rivers, lakes, or other public waterways. Determinations of navigability and coordination with appropriate federal agencies will be included in the scope if applicable. 7.3.9 Land Use, Access, & Traffic Safety Evaluate the potential impacts to land use, access, and traffic safety within the project area. KN 24611 – SOW Page 19 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 DELIVERABLES: • Narrative and supporting documents 7.3.10 Geology and Soils It is assumed that geology and soils analysis is not warranted. HMH can add these services as a supplemental agreement if required. 7.3.11 LWCF Recreation Areas/6(f) Lands It is assumed there are no Section 6(f) Lands in the project area and this analysis is not warranted. If there should be any Section 6(f) lands in the project area, these lands would be evaluated and assessed under a supplemental agreement. 7.4 Joint Permit Application It is assumed that this task is not warranted due to lack of aquatic resources in the project vicinity. If deemed necessary, HMH can add these services as a supplemental agreement. Task 8 Materials HMH will provide geotechnical exploration and design work and will complete the Roadway Materials Report for the project. 8.1 Geotechnical Assistance HMH will accomplish field explorations, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analysis including roadway typical sections, sidewalk support criteria and construction recommendations detailed in a Roadway Materials Report in accordance with Section 240 of the ITD Materials Manual. 8.2 Soils Profile Following completion of field exploration and laboratory testing HMH will prepare soil boring logs describing subsurface conditions. In addition, HMH will review available construction and historical pavement condition information from the City of Rexburg. Assumptions: • the City of Rexburg will provide existing construction information. 8.2.1 Utility Locate and Temporary Use Permit HMH will identify a total of 6 boring locations on the proposed widening . The actual boring locations will be selected based on locations of underground utilities, traffic safety, and other considerations identified during our site reconnaissance and review of available records . The number of borings were determined based on requirements of Section 425.04.02 of the ITD Materials Manual. As stated in Section 425.04.02, borings will be spaced at 200-foot intervals. HMH will mark the boring locations in the field and coordinate location using Idaho’s “one-call” locate service, Digline, to coordinate the marking of underground utilities. This work will be performed as part of field exploration activities. If there are other site utilities not located by Digline, they will need to be located by the City of Rexburg. HMH is not responsible for damage to unmarked utilities. HMH will prepare a the City of Rexburg temporary use permit application (including traffic control plans) for work in the right of way. HMH will use subcontracted drilling and traffic control services for field exploration, as the work will require lane closures. If there are KN 24611 – SOW Page 20 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 restrictions on the locations of borings, times when field work may occur, or access limitations to portions of the alignments, HMH should be notified of these prior to beginning field work to avoid delays and additional costs. Assumptions: • the City of Rexburg will waive all fees associated with the permit applications. 8.2.2 Soil Borings Soil borings will be drilled using hollow stem auger drilling equipment to explore the near surface soils along the roadway alignment. Borings will be logged by an HMH engineer to visually classify soils encountered, determine layer thicknesses and obtain samples of the base, subbase, and subgrade soil. Selected samples obtained from the borings will be submitted for laboratory testing to determine engineering properties. The borings will be drilled to a depth of 10 feet as specified in Section 425.04.02 of the Materials Manual. Boring operations will follow a site specific safety plan. A Traffic Control Plan will be required to direct traffic while drilling. The traffic control will consist of a mobile operation with the movement of signs, equipment, and personnel between borings. HMH anticipates that traffic control services will be provided by the drilling subcontractor. Following drilling and sampling all borings will be backfilled in accordance with the State of Idaho Department of Water Resources guidelines. Any existing asphalt pavement at boring locations will be patched using high performance cold-mix asphalt as necessary. Borings completed in areas of existing pavement may experience some heaving of existing deteriorated asphalt in the area surrounding the boring. HMH will take steps to limit heaving, but patching activities will be limited to replacing the asphalt that is removed during drilling operations. Assumptions: • All field explorations will be within the existing right-of-way. • Drilling will be permitted during daylight hours. • Surveying will be performed by HMH to record the actual locations and elevations of the borings. • the City of Rexburg will provide information on any known environmental or safety hazards that could affect boring operations. 8.2.3 Laboratory Testing Soil samples obtained from the borings selected by HMH’s geotechnical engineer will be submitted to a geotechnical testing laboratory for analysis. Laboratory testing will include analyses of geotechnical parameters including in-place moisture (ASTM D 2216) and unit weight (ASTM D 2937), gradation (ASTM D 6913), Atterberg limits (ASTM D 43180), if necessary, and Idaho R- Value (Idaho T-208). Following the submittal of the final report by the laboratory to HMH, samples not submitted for laboratory analysis will be retained by HMH until the completion of project construction. 8.2.4 Engineering Analysis HMH’s engineering analyses will include subsurface characterization, summary of soil engineering properties, pavement design and recommendations for earthwork and surface water management. KN 24611 – SOW Page 21 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 Recommendations will be presented in a Roadway Materials Report. The report will include the following: • Description of subsurface conditions including soil boring logs, summary of laboratory testing and description of soil types encountered and their associated engineering properties. • Pavement condition survey describing visual distress extent and type. • Analysis of available traffic data and determination of roadway projected design traffic 18-kip equivalent single axle loads (ESALs). • Evaluation of engineering properties of soil tested including soil type, in-place unit weight, moisture content and strength utilizing Idaho R-values. • Assessment of soil suitability, resistance to loss of strength and frost susceptibility through evaluation of Atterberg Limits, if necessary. • Pavement design utilizing methods described in the ITD Materials Manual including HMA type, class and PG Grade, lift thickness, nominal aggregate size and individual layer thicknesses. Pavement design variables include terminal serviceability, reliability, standard deviation, resilient modulus and equivalent 18-kip 20-year ESAL loadings. It will also describe recommended construction methods for roadway widening and chip seal. • Recommendations for sidewalk support. • Recommendations for earthwork, slope construction, drainage, use of geosynthetics and surface treatments. Assumptions: • Approved contractor-furnished sources will be used on this project and aggregate source information will not be required. Traffic data will be provided by the City of Rexburg. Deliverables: • Analysis of the field testing and laboratory results will be summarized in the Roadway Materials Report. 8.3 Roadway Materials Report (HMH) HMH will prepare a draft Roadway Materials Report to provide soil information, typical sections, and materials and estimating data necessary to complete the roadway design, calculate plan quantities, and provide special provisions and an engineer’s estimate for the project. The report will be prepared in general accordance with the ITD Materials Manual. The report will include typical pavement and sidewalk section sketches which will be used by project designers to develop the typical section drawings included in the project bid documents. The draft report will be submitted to the City of Rexburg, and LHTAC for review and comment. Once reviewed, HMH will address comments and make modifications as needed to the draft report. Once revisions are made HMH will submit the Final Roadway Materials Report to the City of Rexburg and LHTAC. Assumptions: • A total of one Roadway Materials Report will be prepared. KN 24611 – SOW Page 22 of 22 2nd East Safety Improvements Ph 2 • There will be only one combined set of review comments on the draft report, and only one final version of the report will be issued. Deliverables: • Draft Roadway Materials Report. • Final Roadway Materials Report, including a summary of the agency review comments with resolutions. 8.4 Final Design and PS&E Review (HMH) HMH geotechnical staff will review the project plans and specifications prior to the final design review for compliance with the materials reports. Review comments will be addressed prior to submission of Final Design. A representative from HMH geotechnical staff will attend the Final Design Review meeting. We assume total attendance time will be 6 hours or less, including travel time. HMH will review the summary comments resulting from Final Design Review submittal and the Final Design Review Meeting and prepare responses to materials related review comments as needed. In addition, HMH will revise Material Special Provisions as required, and provide materials related technical support in revising the project plans prior to the PS&E submittal. Deliverables: • Summary of HMH’s review comments on Final Design. • Responses and revisions based on HMH, the City of Rexburg, and LHTAC Final Design Review Comments. CONSULTANT HMH Engineering PROJECT NAME 2nd East Safety Improvements Phase 2 PROJECT NUMBER D2524611 KEY NUMBER 24611 A.SUMMARY ESTIMATED MAN-DAY COSTS Raw Labor Man-Days Man-Hours Hrly Rate Cost 1 22.4 = 179 @ $79.25 = 14,185.75$ 2 32.9 = 263 @ $52.00 = 13,676.00$ 3 45.8 = 366 @ $52.00 = 19,032.00$ 4 16.3 = 130 @ $46.00 = 5,980.00$ 5 17.8 = 142 @ $63.00 8,946.00$ 6 27.8 = 222 @ $65.00 = 14,430.00$ 7 0.0 = 0 @ $49.00 =-$ 8 3.8 = 30 @ $37.00 = 1,110.00$ 9 5.0 = 40 @ $46.00 = 1,840.00$ TOTAL RAW LABOR COST =79,199.75$ B. PAYROLL, FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS & OVERHEAD X =$110,166.85 C. NET FEE X =$25,564.49 D. FCCM Approved FCCM Rate $79,199.75 X $887.04 TOTAL LABOR $215,818.13 E. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY Estimated Unit Cost Expense 1 @ 0.700$ = $ 2,412.20 2 @ 1.00$ =-$ 3 @ 100.00$ =-$ 4 @ 350.00$ = 2,800.00$ 5 =770.00$ 6 =629.00$ =$ 6,611.20 1.12% 13.5% Total Raw Labor Cost Approved Overhead Rate $79,199.75 139.10% Total Raw Labor & Overhead NET FEE** Luis Garcia, EI Kyler Beery, EI Total Raw Labor Cost Maddie Pollard $189,366.60 PRINTING *** LODGING *** MEALS TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE EXHIBIT BOARDS 0 Shawn Metts, P.E. Kort Ware, PE Dan Budd Ronald Hodge, PLS Laura Cannon James Whitbread, P.E. Estimated Amount * MILEAGE (miles)3446 TITLE REPORTS 8 F. SUBCONSULTANTS Estimated Unit Cost Expense 1 = 13,918.00$ 2 9 @ $95.00 =855.00$ 9 @ $35.00 =315.00$ 9 @ $180.00 = 1,620.00$ 2 @ $750.00 = 1,500.00$ 4 @ $115.00 =460.00$ 3 TAG = 13,734.05$ 4 ***Utility Potholing Contractor/HydroVac Excavation(estimate) = 3,505.97$ 5 ***Utility Locate and Potholing Traffic Control(estimate) = 2,578.30$ = 38,486.32$ TOTAL = *As per the "FEDERAL PER DIEM RATES FOR IDAHO" ** Negotiated % Fee *** See Attached Summary $260,915.65 Idaho R TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE Grain Size Analysis (ASTM D-6913) Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318) Unit Weight (ASTM D-2937) Moisture Content (ASTM D-2216) ***Geotechnical Lab Testing (estimate) Estimated Quantity ***Drilling/Traffic Control Contractor (estimate) CONSULTANT TAG PROJECT NAME 2nd East Safety Improvements Phase 2 PROJECT NUMBER D2524611 KEY NUMBER 24611 A. SUMMARY ESTIMATED MAN-DAY COSTS Raw Labor Man-Days Man-Hours Cost 1 9.0 = 72 @ $102.47 =7,377.84$ 2 3.5 = 28 @ $102.47 =2,869.16$ TOTAL RAW LABOR COST =$10,247.00 B. PAYROLL, FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS & OVERHEAD X =$0.00 C. NET FEE X =$0.00 D. FCCM Approved FCCM Rate $10,247.00 X =$0.00 TOTAL LABOR $10,247.00 E. OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSE SUMMARY Estimated Unit Cost Expense 1 @ 0.700$ =442.40$ 2 @ 200.00$ =-$ 3 @ 100.00$ =-$ 4 =110.00$ 5 =102.00$ =654.40$ F. SUBCONSULTANTS Estimated Unit Cost Expense 1 = 2,832.65$ =2,832.65$ TOTAL = *As per the "FEDERAL PER DIEM RATES FOR IDAHO" ** Negotiated % Fee *** See Attached Summary $10,247.00 0.0% Total Raw Labor Cost Approved Overhead Rate Barbara Bauer M.A. Elizibeth Jacox $13,734.05 IDFG Data Request 0 EXHIBIT BOARDS 0 *** LODGING TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE Estimated Quantity Walsworth & Associates, Archeaologist (estimate) Loaded Hrly Rate *** MEALS TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE Total Raw Labor Cost 0.00% Estimated Amount * MILEAGE (miles)632 $10,247.00 0.00% Total Raw Labor & Overhead NET FEE** Project Name:2nd East Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project Number:D2524611 Key No:24611 Prepared By:Shawn Metts, PE Shawn Metts, P.E. Kort Ware, PE Dan Budd Laura Cannon Jim Whitbread, P.E. Ronald Hodge, PLS Luis Garcia, EI Kyler Beery, EI Maddie Pollard Barbara Bauer M.A. Elizibeth Jacox TASK Project Name Project Manager Design Lead, Public Involvment, & Utility Coordination Designer Environmental Lead Geotechnical Lead Survey Manager PLS Lead Inspector Lead Materials Tech/Survey Accounting Cultural Resource Lead Historian TOTAL HRS TOTAL COST 1Project Coordination and Management54 22 12108140 040 120 0 172 10,991$ 1.1 General Administration 12 6164 38 1.2 Pre-Operation Meeting 10 10 4 24 1.3 LHTAC Billing Coordination 16 16 4 36 1.4 LHTAC Coordination & Meetings 12 12 12 10 8 8 62 1.5 Agreement Closeout 4 8 12 2 SURVEY AND MAPPING 1 9 4 0 0 184 0 30 0 0 0 0 228 13,825$ 2.1 Survey Access and Kickoff Meeting 0 2.1.1 Prepare and Mail Access Notification 5 5 2.1.2 Survey Kickoff Meeting 12 3 6 2.2 Project Control Network 0 2.2.1 Research Existing Federal Control Monuments 2 2 2.2.2 Primary Control Network 15 15 2.2.3 Secondary Control 4 4 2.2.4 Survey Control Sheet 24 24 2.3 Right of Way Research and Verification 20 20 2.3.1 Research County Records for Recorded Surveys and Plats 8 8 2.3.2 Monument Preservation 4 4 2.4 Field Survey/Topographic Surveying 60 30 90 2.4.1 Utility Locates 4 4 2.4.2 Process Field Data and Linework 24 8 14 2.4.3 Develop Project Base Map 32 32 3 PROJECT CHARTER 3 4 0000000 000 7 446$ 3.1 Design Criteria Matrix 24 6 3.2 Project Charter Update 1 1 4 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 2232100000000 000 154 8,608$ 4.1 Preliminary Design Plans 0 4.1.1 Preliminary Typical Sections 226 10 4.1.2 Preliminary Roadway Plan 4840 52 4.1.3 Preliminary Illumination Plan 2210 14 4.1.4 Preliminary Utility Coordination and Plans 2212 16 4.2 Preliminary Roadway Quantities and Cost Estimate 488 20 4.3 Preliminary Plan QA/QC 4416 24 4.4 Preliminary Design Submittal 24 6 4.5 Preliminary Review Responses 228 12 5 FINAL DESIGN 48 108 200 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 380 21,380$ 5.1 Final Title Sheet 14 5 5.1.1 Survey Control Map 14 24 29 5.1.2 Project Clearance Summary Sheet 226 10 5.1.3 Final Typical Sections 226 10 5.1.4 Roadway Summary 2412 18 5.1.5 Final Roadway Plan Sheets 2640 48 5.1.6 Final Illumination Plan Sheets 2224 28 5.1.7 Final Detail Sheets 2216 20 5.1.8 Pollution Prevention Plans (PPP)2216 20 5.1.9 Final Signing and Pavement Marking Plans 2216 20 5.1.10 Final Traffic Control Plans 2416 22 5.1.11 Final Utility Coordination and Plans 2412 18 5.2 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 412 16 5.3 Special Provisions 840 48 TAGHMH Page 1 Prepared By:Shawn Metts, PE Shawn Metts, P.E. Kort Ware, PE Dan Budd Laura Cannon Jim Whitbread, P.E. Ronald Hodge, PLS Luis Garcia, EI Kyler Beery, EI Maddie Pollard Barbara Bauer M.A. Elizibeth Jacox TASK Project Name Project Manager Design Lead, Public Involvment, & Utility Coordination Designer Environmental Lead Geotechnical Lead Survey Manager PLS Lead Inspector Lead Materials Tech/Survey Accounting Cultural Resource Lead Historian TOTAL HRS TOTAL COST TAGHMH 5.4 Contract Time Determination 28 10 5.5 Final Plan QA/QC 10 10 24 44 5.6 Final Plan Submittal 24 6 5.7 Final Review Responses and Meeting 224 8 6 PS&E SUBMITTAL 337650000000 000 159 9,167$ 6.1 Plan Revisions 4832 44 6.2 Quantity and Estimate Revisions 444 12 6.3 Special Provision Revisions 424 28 6.4 Constructions Schedule Revisions 12 3 6.5 PPP Changes 226 10 6.6 Resident Engineer's File 24 6 6.7 PS&E QA/QC Review 888 24 6.8 Submit Draft PS&E Package 24 6 6.9 Submit Final PS&E Package 412 16 6.10 Bidding Services 28 10 7 Environmental 14 0 012000000 60280 222 15,647$ 7.1 Project Coordination (HMH/TAG)816 24 7.2 Cultural Resources 60 28 88 7.3 Environmental Evaluation 248 50 7.3.1 Section 4(f) Evaluation 0 7.3.2 Aquatic Resource Deliniation 0 7.3.3 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species 24 24 7.3.4 Noise 0 7.3.5 Air Quality 0 7.3.6 Visual Resources 0 7.3.7 Hazardous Materials 12 12 7.3.8 Hydrology 16 16 7.3.9 Land Use, Access, & Traffic Safety 44 8 7.3.10 Geology and Soils 0 7.3.11 LWCF Recreation Areas/6(f) Lands 0 7.4 Joint Permit Application 0 8 Materials 4 12 001340000 000 150 9,383$ 8.1 Geotechnical Assistance 44 8 8.2 Soils Profile 14 14 8.2.1 Utility Locate and Temporary Use Permit 84 12 8.2.2 Soil Borings 28 28 8.2.3 Laboratory Testing 8 8 8.2.4 Engineering Analysis 24 24 8.3 Roadway Materials Report 32 32 8.4 Final Design and PS&E Review 24 24 TOTALS LHTAC Hours 179 263 366 130 142 222 0 30 40 72 28 0 1472 Negotiated HOURLY RATES $79.25 $52.00 $52.00 $46.00 $63.00 $65.00 $49.00 $37.00 $46.00 $102.47 $102.47 $0.00 TOTAL COST $14,185.75 $13,676.00 $19,032.00 $5,980.00 $8,946.00 $14,430.00 $0.00 $1,110.00 $1,840.00 $7,377.84 $2,869.16 $0.00 $89,446.75 Page 2 Project Name:2nd East Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project Number:D2524611 Key No:24611 Perdiem Days and Lodging Assumptions-HMH Engineering Project Task First/Last Day Full Day Lodging 1.2 Pre-Operation Meeting 2 1 2 2.2.2 Primary Control Network 2.2.3 Secondary Control 2.4 Field Survey/Topographic Surveying 2.4.1 Utility Locates 7.2 Cultural Resources 2 1 8.2.2 Soil Borings 1 Total 7 4 7 Rate Per U.S. G.S.A for Rexburg ID 51.00$ 68.00$ 110.00$ Sub Totals 357.00$ 272.00$ 770.00$ Estimated Lodging Expense 770.00$ Estimated Meals Expense 629.00$ Perdiem Days and Lodging Assumptions-TAG Project Task First/Last Day Full Day Lodging 7.2 Cultural Resources 2 1 Total 2 0 1 Rate Per U.S. G.S.A for Rexburg ID 51.00$ 68.00$ 110.00$ Sub Totals 102.00$ -$ 110.00$ Estimated Lodging Expense 110.00$ Estimated Meals Expense 102.00$ 2 3 4 Project Name:2nd East Safety Improvements Phase 2 Project Number:D2524611 Key No:24611 Mileage Assumptions-HMH Engineering Project Task Rigby, ID Coeur d'Alene, ID Missoula, MTMeridian, ID 1.2 Pre-Operation Meeting 1 1 2.2.2 Primary Control Network 2.2.3 Secondary Control 2.4 Field Survey/Topographic Surveying 2.4.1 Utility Locates 7.2 Cultural Resources 1 1 8.2.2 Soil Borings 1 1 Total Round Trips 7 2 1 1 Distance From HMH Office to the Project 19 479 314 318 Round Trip Distance 38 958 628 636 Sub Total Mileage 266 1916 628 636 Total Mileage 3446 Miles Rate 0.70$ Per Mile Estimated Expense $ 2,412.20 Mileage Assumptions-TAG Project Task # Round Trips 7.2 Cultural Resources 1 Total Round Trips 1 Distance From TAG Office to the Project 316 Round Trip Distance 632 Total Mileage 632 Miles Rate 0.70$ Per Mile Estimated Expense 442.40$ # Round Trips From HMH Engineering 4 1 Imagery ©2025 NASA, Map data ©2025 Google 20 mi Explore new places along this route Add suggested stops 4 hr 21 min 318 miles via I-84 E Fastest route now, avoids road closures on I-84 E.  4 hr 37 min 294 miles via US-20 E Drive 318 miles, 4 hr 21 min680 S Progress Ave Suite #2B, Meridian, ID 83642 to 1118-1128 N 2nd E, Rexburg, ID 83440 HMH Meridian Office to 2nd East Project 8/19/25, 2:27 PM Suite #2B to 1118-1128 N 2nd E, Rexburg, ID 83440 - Google Maps https://www.google.com/maps/dir/680+S+Progress+Ave+Suite+%232B,+Meridian,+ID+83642/43.8416057,-111.7782639/@43.2079273,-115.4075278,…1/2 Imagery ©2025 NASA, Map data ©2025 Google 50 mi Explore new places along this route Add suggested stops 6 hr 50 min 479 miles via I-15 N and I-90 W Fastest route now due to traffic conditions Your destination is in a different time zone.  7 hr 22 min 484 miles via I-90 W Drive 479 miles, 6 hr 50 min1118 N 2nd E, Rexburg, ID 83440 to HMH Engineering, Surveying, and Material Testing 9/3/25, 12:41 PM 1118 N 2nd E, Rexburg, ID 83440 to HMH Engineering, Surveying, and Material Testing - Google Maps https://www.google.com/maps/dir/1118+N+2nd+E,+Rexburg,+ID+83440/HMH+Engineering,+Surveying,+and+Material+Testing,+3882+N+Schreiber+…1/1 Imagery ©2025 NASA, Map data ©2025 Google 20 mi Explore new places along this route Add suggested stops 4 hr 41 min 316 miles via I-84 E Fastest route now, avoids road closures on I-84 E  Shoshone Falls Park 4.8 (11,041) Museum of Clean 4.7 (742) Museum of Idaho 4.6 (1,988) Drive 316 miles, 4 hr 41 minTAG Historical Research & Consulting, 401 W Idaho St, Boise, ID 83702 to 1118-1128 N 2nd E, Rexburg, ID 83440 8/29/25, 11:53 AM TAG Historical Research & Consulting to 1118-1128 N 2nd E, Rexburg, ID 83440 - Google Maps https://www.google.com/maps/dir/TAG+Historical+Research+%26+Consulting,+401+W+Idaho+St,+Boise,+ID+83702/43.8416403,-111.7782334/@43.…1/2 Date: Number: Class/DescriptionFile Number AmountClient's File #Transactee Memo 04/04/2025 Alliance Title & Escrow, LLC HMH Engineering 3882 N Schreiber Wy.,Ste. 104 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815 256291 Invoice Please Remit Payment To: Alliance Title & Escrow, LLC Attn: Accounts Receivable PO Box 201982 Dallas, TX 75320-1982 (208) 388-8881 PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF REMITTANCE ADDRESS Property Address: 9950 South Fern Creek Road Cataldo, ID 83810 Non-Insured Title ReportPurchaser with contractual rights under a purchase agreement with the vested owner identified at Item 4 below. Non-Insured Title Report $350.00687455 Total $350.00 $350.00Total Due Buyer (Borrower) - Purchaser with contractual rights under a purchase agreement with the vested owner identified at Item 4 below. Seller (if any) - Catherine L. Wenstrom Loan Amount (if any) - Sales Price (if any) - HAZ-TECH DRILLING, INC. 1798 E. PLAZA LOOP NAMPA, ID., 83687 PH: (208) 461-7277 OR (800) 359-1502 FAX: (208) 461-5211 PROPOSAL TO:HMH ENGINEERING DATE : 8/19/2025 ATTN: JIM WHITBREAD INVOICE # :XX PROJECT: REXBURG, ID TERMS :NET 30 DAYS UNITS UNIT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION EST PRICE EST ******************************************************************** ************* ***************** MOB & DEMOB TRUCK MOUNT 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 DRILLING & RELATED ACTIVITIES, PER DAY 1.00 $3,750.00 $3,750.00 TOOL WEAR / BIT CHARGES, PER FOOT 60.00 $5.00 $300.00 PER DIEM, PER DAY 1.00 $450.00 $450.00 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT, PER DAY 1.00 $150.00 $150.00 ASPHALT PATCH, PER BAG 6.00 $30.00 $180.00 CITY ROW, STREET WORK, PERMITS 1.00 $300.00 $300.00 BENTONITE, PER BAG 24.00 $12.00 $288.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL, PER DAY 1.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 MOB-DEMOB, TRAFFIC CONTROL, PER DAY 1.00 $500.00 $500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT EST:$13,918.00 6 AUGER BORINGS TO 10' MIKE CORN 2nd East Safety Improvements Project ANALYSIS NUMBER OF TESTS UNIT COST EXTENDED COST Unit Weight (ASTM D-2937)9 $95 $855 Moisture Content (ASTM D-2216)9 $35 $315 Grain Size Analysis (ASTM D-6913)9 $180 $1,620 Idaho R 2 $750 $1,500 Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318)4 $115 $460 TOTAL ESTIMATED LAB COST $4,750 Badger Hydrovac Service Proposal United States Prepared By:   Joshua Piper    Email: JPiper@badgerinc.com  Phone:  208-565-6944    Date:   08/28/2025    Estimate Number:   CPQ-201438v1    Project Name: Rexburg potholes     Estimate     Badger Daylighting Corp  IDAHO FALLS ID CORP  3132 Lockheed Circle Suite B Idaho Falls, ID  83401"An equal opportunity employer"ID License #RCE-38047 and #020808   Date   08/28/2025    Reference   CPQ-201438    Prepared By   Joshua Piper    Customer Information  Company HMH ENGINEERING   Contact Name Gilmore Jenkins   Contact Phone # +1 (208) 406-6959  Email gjenkins@hmh-llc.com   Billing Address 680 S. PROGRESS AVE. STE 2B  Title Manager    Billing City/State Meridian ID 83642   Account Number 11183178   Service Address 940 N 2nd E   Rexburg ID 83440-5247   Scope Of Work  1 day of potholing for utilities    Service Item Item Description Unit Cost UOM Quantity Amount  BADGER HYDROVAC WITH OPERATOR    $294.00 HR  8.0 $2,352.00   BADGER HYDROVAC WITH OPERATOROVERTIME     $329.19 HR  2.0 $658.38   DISPOSITION    $130.00 EA  1.0 $130.00   CONSUMABLE MATERIALS    $44.66 EA  1.0 $44.66   FLUCTUATING FUEL RECOVERY    $265.10 EA  1.0 $265.10   SUPPLY WATER    $55.83 EA  1.0 $55.83          Total   $3,505.97     This proposal contains the budgetary estimate to complete the work as described above under the heading "Scope of Work". If any part of the work varies from that described in Scope of Work, or if unexpected digging conditions are encountered (eg rocks, rubble, roots, etc...), then additional chargesshall apply. All work will be done on a time and material basis. All work will be done in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in BadgerDaylighting Corp.'s standard terms and conditions (USA) attached hereto.      Customer (Company) _______________   PO #: _______________   Name (Please Print) _______________  Title: _______________  Signature _______________   Date: _______________    I am authorized to bind the Company       www.badgerinc.com Page 2 of 7   Quote 3400 East Sunnyside Road Idaho Falls, Id 83406 DBE Certified (208) 522 – 4470 Date: 8/28/25 Number of Pages: 2 Regarding: KN24611 - N 2nd E Notes: 1. Price does not include Davis Bacon Wage. Price does not include night flagging. Price does not include public notification. 2. This price does not include ADA requirements. 3. Price does not include any permits. 4. Notice of award before the project starts day, we need a minimum of 4 day business day notice. 5. The suggested subtotal price is for the job projection and is NOT the final bill price. a. If there is a discrepancy between the Unit Price and the Extended Price, the unit price is the correct price. 6. Traffic Control Rental of Equipment includes: a. Drums, candles, signs, barricades as needed, and PE stamped traffic control plans as needed. b. NO Flaggers quoted on project. 7. Temporary traffic control equipment meets ITD & MUTCD standards, as well as usage of designated equipment, channelizer spacing, and condition. Item #Description Quantities Unit Unit Price Extended 1 1.1 RWA 3 EA 85.00$ 255.00$ 1.2 Right Lane Closed Ahead 2 EA 85.00$ 170.00$ 1.3 Merge Left 2 EA 85.00$ 170.00$ 1.4 End RW 2 EA 55.00$ 110.00$ 1.5 Drums 18 EA 25.00$ 450.00$ 1.6 Tubular Markers - Candles 60 EA 15.00$ 900.00$ Tax on Traffic Control Equipment 0.06 %2,055.00$ 123.30$ 2 Labor 2.1 Initial Delivery & final Clean Up 1 LS 400.00$ 400.00$ 2.2 Traffic Control Maintenance (If Requsted - Minium 1 Hrs Charged / Trip / EA) 0 HR / EA 65.00$ -$ 2.3 Labor Mobilizaition Fee 0 Trip / Request 50.00$ -$ Subtotal 2,578.30$ Please Read ALL Line Items AND Notes!! Traffic Control Equipment 8. Price does not include Arrowboards, message boards, speed trailers, portable traffic signals, crash cushions, light plants, recording of pavement markings, rolling stops. 9. If this is a rebid, all previous bids are null and void. 10. This quote expires in 45 days. 11. If there is over a 3% increase on materials, then the costs will be passed onto the General Contractor, or the Owner of the project. 12. General Contractor may do their own traffic control as needed. a. If the contractor wishes to do their own traffic control, please remember that this equipment has our logo upon it. b. Please make sure that any unnecessary equipment not being used is lowered and not impeding pedestrians or left on lawns. c. Please remember to clean up any signs not in use anymore or call us so that we may remove the signs before they are lost, damaged or stolen. d. Stolen or damaged rental equipment may subject the General Contractor / Owner to additional fees to cover losses. i. A sign pull list will be issued to the contractor / owner for the duration of the project. It is understandable that some loss of equipment may occur on every project. But excessive loss & / or damaged equipment may incur charges for equipment losses & / or damages. Questions or Comments, Dustin Smith TCS, TCDS Bid Estimator (208) 522-4470 dsmith@idahotrafficsafety.com Agreement to above terms: Job Title: ___________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: ___________________ Signature: ___________________ • Please send all billing information (Name of accountant, Address & Email) with the signed quote. 1 WALSWORTH & ASSOCIATES 1324 Riverside Dr. Buhl, ID 83316 208-720-2887 claudiawalsworth@gmail.com KN 24611 2nd. East Safety Improvement Project Rexburg, Idaho COST ESTIMATE DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2025 To: Barbara Perry Bauer, M.A. TAG Historical Research and Consulting a/b/n The Arrowrock Group, Inc. 208-338-1014 bpbauer@taghistory.com For: Class III Archaeological Survey (Section 106) Project Location: North 2nd Ave. East in Rexburg, ID Legal Description: Portions of Sections 17 & 18 in Township 6 North, Range 40 East Area of Potential Effect (APE): ca. 6 acres DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Administrative - 1 hr. @$109.25 $109.25 Conduct pre-field background research within one mile radius of Area of Potential Effect (APE) through the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office’s (SHPO) Idaho Cultural Resources Information System (ICRIS) - 4 hrs. @ $109.25 $437.00 ICRIS repository use fees $250.00 Conduct an intensive, Class III cultural resource survey of the APE, including travel from Buhl to Rexburg – 8 hrs. @ $109.25 $874.00 Record cultural resources IF found within the APE. This will be at a cost to be determined. Costs to record cultural resources varies depending on size and complexity of the resource and can range from $500 to $3,000 or more per resource. To Be Determined (TBD) TBD Prepare archaeological portion of the report for federal and state review – 8 hrs. @ $109.25 $874.00 Sub Total $2,544.25 Mileage 412 miles @ $.70 per mile $288.40 *Total proposed cost estimate $2,832.65 *Please note this estimate does NOT include costs for recording sites in the APE, providing archaeological site monitoring during ground disturbance, or additional work required by Idaho Transportation Department of the Idaho SHPO. 2 Figure 1. Project Vicinity in Madison County, Idaho. 3 Figure 2. Project Location Map. Rexburg, ID USGS Quadrangle. Figure 3. Project Location Map. Courtesy 2025 Google Earth Imagery.