HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Agenda August 17, 2005 Public Hearing (2)CITY OF —
REX_ BURG
AMLRICA'S [AiWLY COMMUNII Y
geCiBHE�
Item: Comprehensive Plan Map Public Hearing
Initiated by: Staff
COUNCIL AGENDA
INFORMATION SHEET
Financial impact: N/A Budgeted: N/A
Funding Source: N/A
Agenda Item # 9-A
Date: August 17, 2005
Action Proposed: Review and approve Comprehensive Map Plan changes that are
proposed.
Staff Analysis:
A. On July 7, 2005, the four areas in question were presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning
Commission.
Area #1: Comment was made that the applicant of Area # 1 withdrew the application for the
Rezone/Annexation the previous day but requested to continue on with the request for the
Comprehensive Plan Map Change. Chairman Dyer said that they would still process both requests.
Commissioners felt that Commercial was not growing out there yet; therefore, David Stein moved to
recommend to City Council denying the request for a Comprehensive Plan Map change for segment
Number One (1). Mike Ricks seconded the motion. None Opposed. Motion carried. Because
Area #1 was not adjacent to the Rexburg City limits, David Stein moved to recommend to City
Council denying the annexation/rezone request for the particular parcel. Mike Ricks seconded the
motion. None opposed. Motion carried.
Area #2: Most of the comments from the public were their concerns for protecting the adjacent
Stonebridge Subdivision. Due to the ability of the Commission to require a buffer or other conditions
that would protect the neighborhood if the applicant did propose to rezone in the future, Thaine
Robinson moved to recommend to City Council changing "2a" from Multi -Family to Single -Family
and "2b" from Multi -Family to Commercial. Ted Hill seconded the motion. None opposed.
Motion carried.
Area #3: There was much input from the public regarding the conservation of their historic
neighborhood. David Stein suggested that they have a Project Redevelopment Option, which would
not require a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map. David Stein moved that they recommend to
City Council denying the change to the Comprehensive Plan Map for area three (3) from residential
to mixed use, but strongly encourage the Neighborhood Association and property owners requesting
development to get together and use the Project Redevelopment Option. Thaine Robinson seconded
the motion. David Stein, Thaine Robinson, and Joseph Laird were in favor of the motion.
Chairman Dyer, Ted Hill and Mike Ricks were not in favor of the motion. Motion did not carry.
Mike Ricks moved to recommend to City Council that they do have the Mixed Use Zone change on
the Comprehensive Plan Map on that particular area. Ted Hill seconded the motion. Chairman
Dyer, Ted Hill and Mike Ricks were in favor of the motion. David Stein, Thaine Robinson, and
Joseph Laird were not in favor of the motion. Motion did not carry. Thaine Robinson moved to
recommend to City Council tabling it for further discussion. Joseph Laird seconded the motion.
None opposed. Motion carried.
Area #4: The Commissioners felt that this was a slightly different case than Area. #3 due to the fact
that it was set further in towards the neighborhood. There was, again, much input from the public
regarding the conservation of their historic neighborhood. The public felt that the Mixed Use Zone
was too broad. They do not want a Neighborhood Business District or restaurants put in their
neighborhood. They wouldn't mind seeing small patio homes built in the empty lot of the applicant's
property. Some agreed that the Project Redevelopment Option would be a good idea to implement.
David Stein moved that they recommend to City Council denying the application for the
Comprehensive Plan Map change for Area Four (4). Thaine Robinson seconded the motion. David
Stein amended his motion to encourage having a PRO zone. Thaine Robinson seconded the
amended motion. None opposed. Motion carried.
■' r 7i"i�Ti �
i
': NI
�1
11 � 11
� 1' tali � ■ �.
6
• dill rl"li"rl•"�i. r _ �p �
e
■
� I�NII11 r�
�11 �
�•• � Cs I�ill!I ��iiF. ii_ II !�:�.� �IIII � �'� IN 'i � �
C� ■�' 1 - p'!^ rrr7
�°• a � II iii.I � •�I 11 �I III Simi`gill" ��
I IIUIIII-�� I uw I�LI S III It, i III ■ ■ •,r II ■ t■y
= II 4�i� �. � Illlw � 1� riil ■ Sl:�ti ',= :� � � -
■
=1:■ . 11 .11 ti=
Agd culture and Industrial to Commercial
Residential. Residential
-#2b Residential
PFOPOSED CITY OF RFXBUFG
COMP■ +