Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 8.17.23(208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Planning and Zoning Minutes - August 17, 2023 City Staff and Others: Alan Parkinson – P&Z Administrator Katie Jo Saurey – P&Z Administrative Assistant Kyle Baldwin – Planner 1 Natalie Powell – Compliance Officer Spencer Rammell – Commissioner Attorney Chairperson Smith opened the meeting at 6:32 PM. Planning & Zoning Meeting: Welcome Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL of Planning and Zoning Commissioners: Present: Vince Haley (Vice Chair), Randall Kempton, Todd Marx, Sally Smith (Chairperson), Bruce Casper, Eric Erickson, Vanessa Johnson, McKay Francis, Aaron Richards Absent: Jim Lawrence Minutes: (video index 0:04:03) Approval of the P&Z Minutes from August 3rd, 2023 (Action) MOTION: Motion to approve the Planning & Zoning minutes as recorded for August 3rd, 2023. Action: Approve, Moved by McKay Francis, Seconded by Todd Marx. Commissioner Discussion on the Motion: None VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes = 8, No= 0, Abstain = 2). Yes: Vince Haley (Vice Chair), Todd Marx, Bruce Casper, Eric Erickson, Vanessa Johnson, McKay Francis, Aaron Richards, Jim Lawrence No: none Abstain: Randall Kempton, Sally Smith Plats: (video index 0:04:50) 1. (23-00085) Founders Square Phase 3 – Located at the end of Sunrise Drive, this property is zoned as Low Density Residential 1 (LDR1). The plat consists of approximately 4.6 acres and will contain 15 lots. – Sephlin & Daric Hepworth (Action) (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Alan showed the project location on the overhead map, then turned the time over to Mr. Winston Dyer to present the application. Mr. Dyer introduced himself and thanked the Commission and Staff for allowing him to present. He reviewed the location and the Planned Unit Development that was previously approved. He stated that the infrastructure plans have received both DEQ and City Engineer approval. The proposed plat was shown on the screen and Mr. Dyer stated it is in accordance with the approved Masterplan of the PUD. He discussed the applicants willingness to accommodate the City’s desires in relation to dedicating land for future roadways. He respectfully requested that the Commission recommend approval to the City Council for the Founders Square Phase 3 Development. McKay asked for clarification on why this plat was being presented if the PUD had already been approved. Mr. Dyer explained that this is a new phase and each phase must be presented for approval. Eric asked if the lot sizes of this phase were consitent with the rest of the development. Mr. Dyer confirmed. Sally asked Mr. Dyer to go back to the Masterplan to show the commissioners the greenspace areas that were originally required. Mr. Dyer showed the Masterplan and referred to it as a preliminary plat. He pointed out the smaller lot sizes, explaining how they are smaller than what the code allows for that zone, because the approved PUD allowed those exceptions. He mentioned the amenities along Sunrise Drive and the greenspace provided. Bruce commented that other subdivisions next to dry farms have had issues with run off and flooding. Mr. Dyer confirmed this development is in a hole, but the Masterplan storm drain covered both subdivisions, and the City constructed a retention pond across Sunrise drive to handle the storm drainage and it hasn’t flooded since it was put into place. Alan presented the staff report, confirming that Mr. Dyer had given all the information about the plat, and that the plat has met all of the requirements and has been approved by Staff. Conflict of Interest/Ex parte Communication: Chairperson Smith asked the Commissioners to disclose any conflicts of interest or conversations held outside of this meeting relative to this particular subject. MOTION: Motion to recommend to City Council the approval of Founders Square Phase 3 Plat as presented as staff has signed off on all the relevant requirements and it appears (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org to be ready to go to the next phase. Action: Approve, Moved by Randall Kempton, Seconded by Vince Haley. Commissioner Discussion on the Motion: none VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 9, No= 0, Abstain = 0). Yes: Vince Haley (Vice Chair), Randall Kempton, Todd Marx, Sally Smith (Chairperson), Bruce Casper, Eric Erickson, Vanessa Johnson, McKay Francis, Aaron Richards No: none Abstain: none Public Hearings: (video index 0:23:43) 2. (23-00398) Squires Property Rezone – Located at 458 E Moody Rd, the application is to change the zoning of approximately 22 of the 26 acres in the parcel from Light Industrial (LI) to Community Business Center (CBC). – Bron Leatham (Action) Sally introduced the application and Kyle presented the Staff Report. He described the location of the parcel and its current zoning. He explained the applicant, Bron Leatham, is asking to rezone the Light Industrial (LI) section to Community Business Center (CBC). He indicated that Staff has reviewed and approved the application, explaining that the infrastructure is in place since it was planned for years ago, and the potential projects better align with the Community Business Center (CBC) zoning. He concluded that Staff is asking the Commission to consider recommending the application to City Council for approval. Vince clarified that there is a portion of the parcel that is currently zoned as CBC, but the back portion is not. Kyle confirmed. Vince asked what the difference is between the Regional Business Center (RBC) and Community Business Center (CBC) zones. Kyle explained that RBC is for bigger box stores and are bigger lots. CBC has smaller lots, similar to the bank and Wendy’s that is going in nearby. Discussion ensued about the surrounding Light Industrial (LI) zoning and the City limits. Chairperson Smith opened the public input portion of the hearing at 6:58 pm. In Favor: none Neutral: none (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Opposed: none Written Correspondence: none Rebuttal: none Chairperson Smith closed the public input portion of the hearing at 6:59 pm. Conflict of Interest/Ex parte Communication: Chairperson Smith asked the Commissioners to disclose any conflicts of interest or conversations held outside of this meeting relative to this particular subject. Commissioner Discussion: Aaron stated that he likes that the rezone request is West of the rail line, to preserve the rail as Light Industrial (LI). He would prefer to have retail across from Walmart and along that corridor. Vince added that he doesn’t see Light Industrial going in next to the bank and Wendy’s. He agreed with Aaron’s comment about the railroad access being preserved for the fertilizer plant, concluding that he believes this proposal makes sense. Sally agreed, commenting that it makes sense with the growth seen in that area. MOTION: Motion to recommend to City Council the rezone of the proposed property from Light Industrial to Community Business Center so it is a continuance of what is already there and to better fit what we anticipate that will go in that area. Action: Approve, Moved by Vince Haley, Seconded by Randall Kempton. Commissioner Discussion on the Motion: none VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 9, No= 0, Abstain = 0). Yes: Vince Haley (Vice Chair), Randall Kempton, Todd Marx, Sally Smith (Chairperson), Bruce Casper, Eric Erickson, Vanessa Johnson, McKay Francis, Aaron Richards, No: none Abstain: none (video index 0:32:23) 3. (23-00404) Tait Wood Shop Home Business CUP – Located at 455 Twisted Willow, the application is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wood shop home based business. – Jordan Tait (Action) Jordan Tait presented his application. He showed his company website on the screen to show the dining sets that he has built. He explained that he was doing this part time out of his garage, but has since built a shop on the side of his home specifically for this (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org purpose and was guided that before he could get the Certificate of Occupancy for the shop he would need to get the Conditional Use Permit approved. Eric asked Mr. Tait if he anticipated truck traffic for shipping. Mr. Tait responded that he does not since he picks up his own lumber in order to select it himself. Sally asked about shipping the products. He responded that he delivers all pieces either to a Fedex facility near Blackfoot or to the clients home. Eric expressed his concern with future truck traffic. Mr. Tait explained that if his business grows, he will get commercial space. Eric asked about any waste, noise and if everything was contained. Mr. Tait advised there was none, indicating that a close neighbor was in attendance and could confirm, and that unless the door was open for fresh air, all materials would be inside the shop. Eric asked if Mr. Tait would object to conditions of truck traffic and containment being added to the CUP. Mr. Tait responded he was not opposed. Attorney Rammell advised that he had a legal issue with the conditions since the code already calls out those out, and the nature of a CUP is that staff has reviewed those things. He explained that if it becomes an issue, then code enforcement comes in. He stated that it is essentially already addressed and he advised against putting a prohibition on commerce and transportation. Vince asked if he drove by house Mr. Tait’s home if it would look different than a garage. Mr. Tait responded yes, only because there is a port a potty outside of it for his employee, otherwise, no. Vince commented that the City will hear from neighbors if it is a problem. Kyle presented the Staff Report. He began by showing the Home Business requirements in the Development Code on the screen. He concluded that staff has reviewed the application and all requirements have been met, so Staff is asking that the Commission considers recommending the application to City Council for approval. Chairperson Smith opened the public input portion of the hearing at 7:10 pm. In Favor: Tammy Geddes lives right across street. She stated she is for the Tait’s, but had a question about the sawdust and if there will be something included about having to dispose of it accordingly. Kevin Baxter stated that he is for this and in relation to the sawdust that may potentially become an issue, sawdust is an efficient oil spill cleanup for concrete and other surfaces. He is for the zoning change so that Mr. Tait can get his business under operation and can potentially sell the sawdust to those in shops who need it to clean up oil. Neutral: none (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Opposed: Kirby Forbush introduced himself as the developer of Willowbrook. He stated that there are covenants that do not allow commercial business. He informed the Commission that when Mr. Tait built his shop he dumped the sod onto Mr. Forbush’s undeveloped lots and never removed it, and has dumped sawdust on there as well. He reported that he only spends time in the subdivision when he is required to mow his empty lots around the 4th of July and there were trucks delivering materials to Mr. Tait at that time. He referred back to the covenants not allowing businesses and this is in direct conflict to the covenants. He mentioned that Mr. Tait’s fence is not in compliance with the covenants and Mr. Tait has expressed that he needs time to fix it. Mr. Forbush concluded that he is against this. Written Correspondence: none Rebuttal: Mr. Tait stated there were a number of inaccuracies in Mr. Forbush’s assessment. He spoke to the sawdust that Ms. Geddes and Mr. Baxter had referred to. He stated that he has purchased a pellet maker to turn his sawdust into wood pellets to sell to those with pellet stoves and indicated it is a delicate process. He addressed Mr. Forbush’s statements, beginning with the sod that Mr. Forbush claimed came from his shop. He stated that he did not put it there but could not deny that it came from his shop. He explained he had hired a builder who had postponed the project, then dug the hole while Mr. Tait was on vacation. Approximately 2 months later Mr. Forbush approached him about the sod. Between building the shop himself and the business, he currently doesn’t have the funding to do what Mr. Forbush is asking him to do. He stated that he is waiting for Mr. Forbush to show him the section of the covenants that indicate the fence standards but didn’t think that was relevant to this hearing. He began to tell about a confrontation with Mr. Forbush when Attorney Rammell advised that while Mr. Tait has the right to rebut specific claims, but that covenants are between homeowners and developments and are not relevant to this decision. Mr. Tait inquired if Attorney Rammell meant that he should not address the covenants. Attorney Rammell responded that with the things said, he has a procedural right to rebut, but there is a line between fences and covenants and an alleged altercation that is more personal in nature and does not have any bearing on this. Mr. Tait offered that his purpose in bringing it up was to point out the inaccuracies in Mr. Forbush’s testimonies as he felt Mr. Forbush was trying to paint a picture of him that he felt was not accurate. Mr. Tait resumed his account of Mr. Forbush being upset about the sod. He admitted that his children use sawdust as lining in their bunny cages and have dumped the used sawdust into the field and that he will address them to stop. He added that he had rented equipment and moved the sod. He concluded that he didn’t put the sod there, didn’t authorize it to be there, but it is gone. Chairperson Smith closed the public input portion of the hearing at 7:21 pm. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Conflict of Interest/Ex parte Communication: Chairperson Smith asked the Commissioners to disclose any conflicts of interest or conversations held outside of this meeting relative to this particular subject. Commissioner Discussion: Sally asked Kyle for the difference between a commercial business and a home-based business. Kyle responded that the Conditional Use Application is for a home-based business, which is allowed in residential zones. Eric inquired about the zoning and HOA relationship, and which would take legal precedence. Attorney Rammell explained that the City does not address HOA’s, HOA’s are based on individual agreements, contracts, and the enforceability of the covenants. He advised that in this type of Planning & Zoning forum, it is not appropriate to bring up or base any land use decision on them. Alan explained that commercial entities are dedicated strictly for commercial, there are no other uses, where this is in a home and no different than piano lessons or a psychologist doing counseling in their home, and it is not ruled a commercial zone. Commissioners asked to see the definitions in the Development Code on the screen. Randall asked if staff had reviewed this application against the standards and if the standards were met. Kyle confirmed, then briefly reviewed the requirements in the Development Code. Attorney Rammell further explained that the ruling of the board tonight does not trump or act as a safeguard between covenant and contracts between individuals and that the City will not enforce private agreements. Vince asked if the Commissioner’s should forget that the HOA covenants were mentioned. Attorney Rammell guided that there were additional statements made besides covenants, but that votes should not be based on covenants that haven’t been seen. Vince confirmed he had not seen the covenants. Eric commented that from a land use perspective, the lot size is plenty big for a shop. He thinks that as long as all conditions are met, there is no reason why a home-based business couldn’t survive and thrive in that area. He expressed his concern about the business growing and additional traffic but acknowledged that conditions are there and enforceable. Randall stated he wouldn’t feel comfortable denying the permit based on the fact that he has met the requirements and staff has reviewed and recommended it. Vince added that in addition to requirements being met, the applicant’s neighbor is known to the commission will report nuisances as she is involved and not afraid to voice her opinion if needed. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Eric noted his concern about the potential of waste materials being dumped on a vacant lot next door and how that would be addressed. Alan specified it would be a code enforcement issue. McKay voiced his support for the use. MOTION: Motion to recommend to City Council the approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the Tait Woodshop Home Business as discussed, meeting all requirements of the CUP and assurances that the business will comply with requirements and conditions. Action: Approve, Moved by Eric Erickson, Seconded by Todd Marx. Commissioner Discussion on the Motion: none VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 9, No= 0, Abstain = 0). Yes: Vince Haley (Vice Chair), Randall Kempton, Todd Marx, Sally Smith (Chairperson), Bruce Casper, Eric Erickson, Vanessa Johnson, McKay Francis, Aaron Richards, No: none Abstain: none (video index 1:07:40) 4. (23-00503) Comprehensive Plan Update – Final draft of the Comprehensive Plan to be presented for consideration. (Action) Alan presented the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan, commenting on the long process, input from many entities, and asking that the Commissioner’s consider recommending it to City Council for approval. Vince asked how the approval or denial of the Comprehensive Plan’s final draft would relate to the East Parkway Cooridor. Alan explained that the Comprehensive Plan is a guiding document and states that it follows the adopted City Plans. If any City Plan is adopted or changed, it automattically becomes part of the Comprehensive Plan; the Comprehensive Plan does not dictate those plans. Vince acknowledged the audience may have concerns about the Comprehensive Plan setting the East Parkway Corridor location in stone. Alan confirmed that the Comprehensive Plan has no power over that at all, rather the Adopted Transportation Plan does, and it can be amended at any time. Randall asked if the Transportation Plan was already adopted. Alan explained that a work meeting has been scheduled for September 6th to go over the Transporation Plan that had been tabled. (video index 01:11:30) (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Sally inquired about the updated statistics. Alan confirmed they were updated. Vince asked if the statistics were updated to the best of staff’s abilities. Alan confirmed that the statistics were updated to the best of the sources being quoted in the Comprehensive Plan; that Rexburg did not conduct its own studies for the statistics but rather relies on the Census and other plans. Alan reiterated that staff plans on reviewing the Comprehensive Plan annually to ensure the data remains as current as possible. Vince asked for the difference between the Comprehensive Plan and the zone. Alan explained the Comprehensive plan is a guiding document of what is predicted based on current conditions to help the City plan for future development and uses, which helps save City and Citizens money. Vince inquired about the Commission’s ability to deny potential zone changes even if the applicant is meeting the Comprehensive Plan proposed zoning. Alan confirmed that the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council have the authority to deny the application; that the Comprehensive Plan is a future idea, and maybe the application doesn’t fit what is happening now. Attorney Rammell advised that in such situations to articulate the considerations leading to the denial of the application, even though the application is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. Eric added that the Land Use Planning is very well written and takes extreme efforts to explain that zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are two separate things. Vince asked if the City had tried, to the best of it’s ability, to reach out and receive as much input as possible. Alan replied yes, but looking back, the City could have done better. He disclosed that a meeting is scheduled next week for staff to discuss how to do this better in the future. Sally commented that the Steering Committee really did try to reach out to many people; that even using social media, information can be blasted, but people have to be interested and want to take part in that information. Alan added that those who were interested have been very dedicated, seeking answers, and helped us understand more. Sally resolved that there is no way to get everybody. Eric agreed that unless a specific issue is in their back yard, people are not interested. Vince countered that this is. Vanessa offered that they don’t realize it. Eric commented that those who want to see change, or no change, gather people to get their input, while others relinquish that duty to those who are actively participating. Randall asked if on page 53, the land use map, when this is approved, if the land use map be approved as well, or is it separate. Alan exlained that this is a big part of the Comprehensive Plan and it does regulate; requiring potential applicants to change the map before asking for a zone change. Aaron thanked and complimented the staff, commenting that this has been a slow process as it was a topic during one of the first meetings he attended three years ago. McKay discussed the Comprehensive Plan being a living document and staff having the ability to change it to keep it updated. Alan reported that yes, staff will review it annually (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org and do a thorough review every 5 years, to ensure that the goals and objectives are relevant. He concluded that it is a living document and can be changed at any point; it can be adopted, changes published, and changed again. Eric validated that the plan was well written to allow for continual review. Randall questioned the prioritization considerations listed on page 36, as he felt like the list was more in City Council’s pervue. Alan maintained that what Planning & Zoning approves can effect other things, such as funding; that City Council is relying on Planning & Zoning to be familiar enough to say this does or does not match and to listen to the public. Chairperson Smith opened the public input portion of the hearing at 8:00 pm. In Favor: Corey Barnard, agreed with Eric that this is a very cogent, well written plan, reflective of a lot of work. He stated he has read each iteration as it has been made available and confirmed that the City has responded to public input. He commented that he is proud of the City for that. Brent Harris, stated he supports the plan and appreciates Alan as he’s been very helpful and listened to opinions, staff, the Commission, and Council. He suggested that in the future every comment should be responded to in a way that each iteration does not have to be read to know what happened. He summarized that he generally accepts the plan, acknowledging it will never be perfect, but conceding it is good. Neutral: Jonathan Reed, asked about the work meeting scheduled for the Transportation Plan and if a decision will be made at that time. Alan replied that the conversations could continue, that a decision will not be made at the work meeting, but that Council could take it from the table and make a decision on it at the City Council meeting. He expressed comfort that the Comprehensive Plan could be updated and changed as needed and commented that nothing happened with the East Parkway Corridor after previous discussions that were held years ago. Opposed: Kevin Baxter, commented that his parents raised him to say no if he didn’t know enough about something, and he feels mildly ill-equipped to speak on this issue. He is opposed to the Comprehensive Plan Update because he delivers construction materials for work and while on one hand more development means more business and recreational activities to serve the community, but he has noticed that second to agriculture and major commerce, a major land use is residential, and he is not sure how this plan affects that. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Mike Glasscock, stated he is against the plan. He expressed his concerns with City Councilmembers and Planning & Zoning Commissioners being on the steering committee and questioned if it was a conflict of interest to vote for their own plan and if those on the steering committee should recuse themselves from voting. He addressed his next concern on page 5 of the plan, stating that the plan was put together by Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation of Health. In his opinion, the company has an agenda to promote equity health. He was also concerned that the plan mentioned social determinates of health and discussed this in relation to presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s platform from 2016. He stated that if the City is socialist, to say that, and to not hide it in the Comprehensive Plan. He feels there is no reason to have social engineering in the Comprehensive Plan that deals with bricks and motor, stating it is a ruse. He claimed that there were a few committees able to view the Comprehensive Plan before the public, and his understanding is there was the ability to communicate electronically with each other with post it notes and suggested this formed a quorum. He asked Planning & Zoning to not approve the plan and send it back to the City to have it worked on some more. Wanless Southwick, felt many things about the Comprehensive Plan were good and he appreciates the changes made in response to public input. He thought there was less opportunity for the public to review the final review than ought to have been. He questioned whether it was ready to be acted on for approval. He expressed concern with traffic on 12th W, suggesting additional highway crossings are needed to increase traffic route options to relieve traffic congestion. He commented that grant funds mentioned at last nights City Council meeting could be used to build two overpasses, based on his knowledge of the cost. He suggests this is a reason to consider not approving the plan in it’s present form. Written Correspondence: none. Rebuttal: Alan addressed Mr. Glasscock, explaining that Blue Cross of Idaho provided a grant, no input or authority to the plan, but asked the City to look at trails and paths to help citizens improve their health. He further provided that this foundation is a separate entity than the health insurance. Alan reiterated that the Comprehensive Plan does not call out transportation, rather it is submissive to the Transportation Plan. Alan shared that the Transportation Plan does call for additional overpasses and estimated the cost of a single overpass to be in excess of $20 million since Highway 20 is a high clearance road for large loads, requiring overpasses to have extra height. He suggested attending the Transportation meeting on September 6th. Chairperson Smith closed the public input portion of the hearing at 8:22 pm. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org Sally asked Attorney Rammell if being on the committee was a conflict of interest. Attorney Rammell cited the S Bar Ranch case where the court focused on the phrase “immediate or direct economic conflicts of interest” indicating this is the reason why conflicts of interest are asked for during every application. Eric respectfully took exception to the accusation that this was Planning & Zoning’s plan. He stressed that it was everyone’s plan; Rexburg’s plan. He offered that being more involved in the process was not a conflict of interest, just more involved, and that the community had the choice to be involved. Alan added that Attorney Zollinger approved of everyone on the Steering Committee, there was not a quorum making decisions, and that all comments could be seen on the online draft. Eric echoed Alan, pointing out that the post it notes on the map were done during public meetings, posted on the boards accessible to the public, then reduced to a list of items in the public record. Attorney Rammell emphasized that accusations of back-room deals are taken very seriously, and the question/complaint regarding the Steering Committee followed the book and was reviewed by the Madison County Prosecuting Attorney, who communicated with the City’s attorney, who communicated with the Mayor. He stated that those accusations are not taken lightly and that the City takes pride in doing things the right way. Commissioner Discussion: Vince asked how long the final draft had been available to the public and how many citizens had reached out about it. Alan responded it had been available at least 14 days ago, that it was a little difficult for the public to find it, and that only 2 citizens had reached out to him. Vince commented that while he didn’t want to minimize the situation, the numbers were minimal. Vince then asked if every sticky note was reviewed. Alan replied that himself, staff and Logan Simpson staff had compiled and addressed the sticky notes. Vince asked how the public should submit any additional comments. Alan suggested they email the City Clerk, as she puts any correspondence into the record. Discussion turned to a previous comment of there not being enough commercial zoning. Bruce shared that the City has tried to notify people to come in and that unless it effects them directly they don’t care. He thinks too many people are complacent, and pointed out that the Commission has worked long hours thinking about the citizens of Rexburg, trying to help everyone and that it is nice that the plan is changeable. Eric concluded that after being involved in the process, he thinks it is a great plan that addresses a large part of the issues, and he fully supports the implementation of it. Sally commented that Logan Simpson did an excellent job, not helping to plan the City, but taking comments from Citizens and the history of the City and putting it all together. She reiterated that it will never be perfect and that is why it is a living document. (208) 359-3020 35 North 1st East Rexburg, ID 83440 Rexburg.org | Engage.Rexburg.org McKay emphasized that even with an outdated Comprehensive Plan, the City was still able to progress. He commented that it is a no brainer to move forward with the plan, with the understanding that it can be changed. He pointed out that it is frustrating to sit on a panel and see how few people are engaged, but looking back he wasn’t engaged before either. He shared that it is frustrating as a developer to try to work with such an outdated document; people want to bring great things but are restricted by the current plan. Vince, summarized that this is a community plan, there were many opportunities to make it your community plan, and it is a living document that can be changed. He discussed the unforeseen growth seen since 2008. With all of the opportunities to be involved, he does not want to take a step backwards and not move forward. Aaron, thanked those in attendance and commented on the previous lack of attendance for the Form Based Code decision. MOTION: Motion to recommend to City Council that the Comprehensive Plan updated version be adopted because of the long hours put in by citizens, patrons, council-people and planning and zoning, who are thinking in the best interest of the citizens of Rexburg, Idaho. Action: Approve, Moved by Bruce Casper, Seconded by Vanessa Johnson. VOTE: Motion carried. (Summary: Yes= 9, No= 0, Abstain = 0). Yes: Vince Haley (Vice Chair), Randall Kempton, Todd Marx, Sally Smith (Chairperson), Bruce Casper, Eric Erickson, Vanessa Johnson, McKay Francis, Aaron Richards, No: none Abstain: none The group discussed the Comprehensive Plan will go before the City Council on September 6th, after the Transportation Work Meeting. Heads Up for September 7th, 2023: Adjourned at 8:47 PM.