Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - Copper Heights
Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC | P a g e A p r i l 2021 https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx 2021 bcrowther@civilize.design 3853 W. Mountain View Drive Rexburg, ID 83440 208-351-2824 4/27/2021 Copper Heights Abbreviated Traffic Impact Study Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC i | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Traffic Impact Study Disclaimer All recommendations and/or advice presented in this document regarding probably project conditions are the opinions of Civilize, PLLC. Project conditions are based on information and data sources that are readily available from the public sector, provided by the project owner, previously published studies by other competent professionals, and other reliable sources including state agencies and local municipal government entities, all of which are relied upon as accurate. Our recommendations and/or advice are made on the basis of our experience and represent our judgment and opinions. We have no control over new and/or non-public information, changed conditions, cost of land, cost of labor, materials, equipment, and/or other construction costs, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Therefore, we do not guarantee that actual conditions or actual costs will not vary from those presented in this report. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC ii | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Table of Contents I. Introduction and Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 A. Project Identification ......................................................................................................................... 1 B. Site Location and Study Area ........................................................................................................... 2 C. Methods............................................................................................................................................. 2 D. Applicable Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 3 E. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives .......................................................................................... 3 II. Development ......................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Transportation Planning .................................................................................................................... 4 B. Off-Site Development ....................................................................................................................... 4 C. Description of On-Site Development ................................................................................................ 5 1. Description .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Location ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3. Zoning ........................................................................................................................................... 5 4. Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 6 5. Land Use and Intensity ................................................................................................................. 6 6. Phasing and Timing ...................................................................................................................... 7 III. Study Approach ................................................................................................................................ 8 A. Study Area ........................................................................................................................................ 8 B. Study Period ...................................................................................................................................... 8 C. Study Methodology, Limitations and Assumptions .......................................................................... 8 IV. Area Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 10 A. Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1. Area of Influence ........................................................................................................................ 10 B. Area of Significant Traffic Impact .................................................................................................. 10 C. Study Area Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 11 1. Existing Land Uses ..................................................................................................................... 11 2. Existing Zoning ........................................................................................................................... 11 3. Anticipated Future Development ................................................................................................ 11 D. Site Accessibility ............................................................................................................................ 11 1. Site Access .................................................................................................................................. 11 2. Access Management ................................................................................................................... 13 3. Location and Design Standards for Approaches ......................................................................... 13 4. Area Transportation Elements and Roadway System ................................................................. 14 5. Accident History ......................................................................................................................... 15 V. Existing 2020 Traffic Volumes and Conditions ................................................................................. 17 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC iii | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx A. Traffic Forecasting .......................................................................................................................... 17 B. Analysis of Existing 2020 Traffic Conditions ................................................................................ 17 1. Existing Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................ 17 2. Existing 2020 Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................ 19 VI. Projected Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 22 A. Site Traffic ...................................................................................................................................... 22 1. Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................... 22 2. Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................................... 22 3. Modal Split .................................................................................................................................. 22 4. Trip Assignment .......................................................................................................................... 23 B. Through Traffic (Non-Site Traffic) ................................................................................................. 23 1. Non-Site Traffic for anticipated Development in Study Area .................................................... 23 VII. 2025 Horizon Year Traffic Analysis (Buildout) ............................................................................. 24 A. On-Site Development ...................................................................................................................... 24 B. Roadway Network .......................................................................................................................... 24 C. Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................................................. 24 D. 2025 Traffic Conditions .................................................................................................................. 25 2. Recommendations to Accommodate the 2025 Background plus Site Traffic ............................ 27 VIII. Conclusions. .................................................................................................................................... 29 A. Existing Traffic Conditions (2020) ................................................................................................. 29 B. Build-Out Year (2025) .................................................................................................................... 29 1. Land Use and Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 29 2. Background Traffic Conditions .................................................................................................. 29 3. Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions ................................................................................... 30 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC iv | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Table of Figures Figure 1: Location of Copper Heights (Madison County GIS). ................................................................... 2 Figure 2 - Development in the Vicinity of the Proposed Project (Madison County GIS). ........................... 4 Figure 3: Madison County Zoning (Madison County GIS). ........................................................................ 5 Figure 4: Layout of Copper Heights (Teton View Surveying). ................................................................... 6 Figure 5 - Relationship of Highest Hourly Volume and ADT on Rural Arterials (The Green Book). ......... 9 Figure 6 – Area of Influence Associated with Proposed Development (Madison County GIS). .............. 10 Figure 7: Road Functional Classification, Madison County (excerpt from 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update) ........................................................................................................... 12 Figure 8 - LHTAC Crash Data 2015-2019 ................................................................................................. 15 Figure 9: Project 2020 ADT (Madison County 2015 Transportation Master Plan). .................................. 17 Figure 10: ITD Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Traffic Counts (ITD). ........................................ 18 Figure 11: ITD Peak Hour Traffic (PH) Traffic Counts (ITD). ................................................................. 19 Table of Tables Table II-1 Land Use and Intensity ................................................................................................................ 6 Table IV-1 - Crash Data near Project Site from 2015 to 2019 (LHTAC). .................................................. 16 Table V-1 Level of Service Criteria for General Two-Lane Highway Segments ....................................... 20 Table V-2 – Level of Service for Existing Conditions 2020 ...................................................................... 20 Table VI-1- Land Use and Trip Generation (AADT) for Buildout (2025) ................................................. 22 Table VI-2- Land Use and Trip Generation (Peak Hour) for Buildout (2025) ........................................... 22 Table VI-3 – Peak Hour Trip Assignment per Approach and Direction of Travel, .................................... 23 Table VII-1 Forecasted 2025 Segment AADT and Trip Distribution Volumes ......................................... 24 Table VII-2 Forecasted 2025 Segment Peak Hour and Trip Distribution Volumes ................................... 25 Table VII-3 Level of Service Criteria for General Two-Lane Highway Segments .................................... 26 Table VII-4 – Level of Service for Background Plus Site Traffic 2025 ..................................................... 27 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e A p r i l 2021 https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Elevation Management LLC Copper Heights I. Introduction and Summary Copper Heights is a proposed 61-lot subdivision located in Madison County just outside the impact area of the City of Rexburg. The Madison County Planning & Zoning Commission approved the Concept Plan and the Preliminary Plat submittal for the subdivision. The application for Final Plat submittal is currently begin presented to the Madison County Planning & Zoning Commission for consideration. Civilize, PLLC has been retained by Elevation Management LLC. to prepare a Traffic Impact Study for the Copper Heights project in accordance with the requirements of Teton County. A. Project Identification The following table lists important project identification information and contact information for the project. Project Name Victor Hotel and Workforce Housing Owner Elevation Management LLC Owner Contact Person McKay Francis Owner Address 400 W Pole Line Road Rexburg, ID 83440 Owner Telephone Number (208) 881-6058 Owner Email Engineer Civilize, PLLC Engineer Contact Person Brent E. “Husk” Crowther, P.E. Engineer Address 3853 W. Mountain View Dr. Rexburg, ID 83440 Engineer Project Number 01-20-0030 Engineer Telephone Number 208-351-2824 Engineer Email bcrowther@civilize.design Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 2 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx B. Site Location and Study Area Copper Heights is a proposed 61-lot subdivision located in Madison County just outside the impact area of the City of Rexburg. More particularly the development is situated on the south side of 2000 North between 2000 West and 3000 West, which is approximately two miles north and one mile west of the city limits of Rexburg. The property is situated just outside of the impact zone for the City of Rexburg and connects to the Sunrise Meadows subdivision immediately east. The parent parcel is 65.14 acres and is zoned Transitional Agriculture with a minimum lot size of one acre. There are two proposed accesses: one from 2000 North and one from 3000 West. C. Methods The TIS is conducted in accordance with the guidelines for a traffic impact study as published by the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) in the document titled, Requirements for Transportation Impact Studies as well as the guidance document titled Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Figure 1: Location of Copper Heights (Madison County GIS). Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 3 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx D. Applicable Regulations The Madison County Code, Chapter 1115-Subdivisions, Article II – Procedure for Subdivision Approval, Section 115-28 – Application Requirements, Paragraph (16) states: A circulation plan and traffic impact analysis identifying the likely vehicular circulation into and out of the project area, internal circulation in the project, volumes and timing of vehicular traffic impacts to roadways connecting to and in the vicinity of the project, and proposals for mitigating those traffic impacts; (115,II,115-28,(16))) Copper Ranch proposes three approaches: one on the north side of the development accessing W, 2000 North, one on the west side of the development accessing N. 3000 West, and an interconnection to Robison Drive on the west. The internal road network is planned for roadways that will be dedicated to Madison County upon completion of construction and acceptance by the County. E. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The purpose of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is to evaluate the traffic impacts resulting from the proposed development and to make recommendations for mitigation to the impacts if such prove necessary. The scope of the study includes the following: ➢ Characterization of the proposed development in terms of land use and the type of development anticipated, ➢ Trip generation of the proposed development, both daily and peak hour, ➢ Site traffic distribution and traffic assignment, ➢ Research and presentation of background traffic volumes, both daily and peak hour, ➢ Internal and off-site roadway traffic projections, ➢ Capacity analysis of existing and proposed intersections and approaches for existing conditions and two horizon years (project opening and project buildout) including: • Site access/approach onto W. 2000 North, • Site access/approach onto N. 3000 West. ➢ Analysis of turn lane and deceleration lane warrants, ➢ Development and analysis of traffic mitigation alternatives, and ➢ Recommendations for traffic mitigation. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 4 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx II. Development A. Transportation Planning Madison County Prepared Transportaion Planning Study in 2015 that may be referenced throughout the document along with information gleaned from the work done by the Idaho Transportation Department.. B. Off-Site Development Existing development in the area surrounding the proposed development is representative of transitional agriculture with multiple subdivisions featuring one and two acre lots incl uding Sunrise Meadows to the east, Saddle Creek Estates to the northeast, Sage Hills to the southwest and The Preserve on Henry’s Fork to the northwest. In the last few years, the Hibbard area has attracted developers with the result reflecting the transitional agriculture designation with larger residential lots scattered among the remaining agricultural property. Figure 2 - Development in the Vicinity of the Proposed Project (Madison County GIS). Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 5 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx C. Description of On-Site Development 1. Description The development plans call for 58 single family residences with three of the lots currently designated for open space. The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will be based on the that type of development. 2. Location As presented previously, the proposed development is comprised of a single parcel of 65.14 acres located on the south side of W. 2000 North and the east side of N. 3000 West, which can be seen in Figure 1 and Figure 2. With respect to the public land survey system, the property is located in the West ½ of the Southwest ¼ of Section 14, Township 6 North, Range 39 East, B.M. 3. Zoning The property is currently zoned Transitional Agriculture (TAG) according to the Madison County Zoning Map. The purpose of the TAG zone as described in the Madison County Ordinances, Chapter 115 – Subdivisions is: Scope and purpose. The provisions of this section apply to the Transitional Agricultural (TAG) Zone. The purpose of this Transitional Agricultural (TAG) Zone is to provide for and protect residential lands of a single-family residential environment, located conveniently near urban centers, by providing for an area of transition from agricultural uses to residential. (117-60, (a)) Figure 3: Madison County Zoning (Madison County GIS). COPPER HEIGHTS Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 6 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx The TAG zone does not have a minimum lot size although the overall density should be one dwelling per two acres. 4. Site Plan The master plan has been prepared and presented to Madison County, which has approved the Preliminary Plat submittal. That plan is presented in Figure 4 and a larger version presented in Exhibit A – Proposed Site Plan. Although the site configuration may change slightly in the future, the Site Master Plan represents the best information regarding anticipated future development for land use and will be the basis of traffic projections generated by the proposed development. 5. Land Use and Intensity The development is 65.14 acres. The development as proposed consists of 58 single family residences. While future development may occur in the area of the proposed project, that development is not currently defined and will not be considered in the traffic modeling, rather that responsibility will be relegated to future developers. Table II-1 Land Use and Intensity Lot No. Development Use Lots % of Total Acres 1. Single-Family Residences 58 77.99 % 50.79 2. Community Open Space 3 5.96 % 3.88 3. Right-of-Way NA 16.05 % 10.45 Totals 61 100% 65.12 Figure 4: Layout of Copper Heights (Teton View Surveying). Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 7 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx 6. Phasing and Timing a. Existing Conditions Existing conditions for the subject property are described as agricultural with seasonal traffic generated for farming activity which will be considered negligible with respect to existing traffic conditions. The existing conditions for W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West will be ascertained from traffic counts conducted by ITD as well as Madison County. The existing conditions generate a baseline level of traffic and create the traffic conditions as the currently exist. b. Buildout Conditions The buildout of the project will entail all 58 lots constructed with single-family homes. For purpose of the TIS, this is assumed to occur in 2025. c. Horizon Year 2040 Longer term traffic conditions will be projected to year 2040. The proposed development will remain as described for buildout. W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West will be extrapolated from the planning documents developed by ITD and Madison County. As mentioned earlier, this TIS will not consider additional traffic that may be generated from unknown development surrounding the proposed project. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 8 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx III. Study Approach The scope of this TIS is based on ITD’s Requirements for Transportation Impact Studies (Supplement to Board Policy B-12-06) as well as the guidance document titled Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The specific parameters and requirements for the TIS were also based on verbal consultation with the Traffic Engineer for ITD District VI in Rigby, Idaho. A. Study Area The study area consists of the approaches from Copper Heights onto W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West and the two intersections below. 1. Intersection #1 – 2000 North and 2000 West. 2. Intersection #2 – 2000 North and 3000 West B. Study Period The following study periods were identified for analysis: 1. 2020 (Existing) 2. 2025 (Project Buildout) 3. 2040 (Horizon year) The following time intervals were identified for analysis: 1. Weekend AM peak hour. 2. Weekend PM peak hour C. Study Methodology, Limitations and Assumptions The following methodology, limitations and assumptions were used for this analysis: ➢ The Traffic Impact Study includes two intersections; W. 2000 North and N. 2000 West which is a four-leg intersection and W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West which is also a four-leg intersection. ➢ No other intersections were included in the TIS. Madison County may require analysis of additional intersections which will require an amendment to this TIS. ➢ A separate phasing analysis may be required by Madison County to identify when mitigation improvements are triggered. Phasing analysis in addition to the study periods identified above is not included in this TIS and will be conducted in a separate study if required. ➢ The Transportation Research Board’s 2016 Highway Capacity Manual (2016 HCM) methodologies were utilized to determine the level of service (LOS) for signalized and unsignalized intersections. LOS ratings are based on the average control delay per vehicle and a volume to capacity ratio (v/c). The LOS for the roads and intersections identified were extracted from the Madison County Transportation Plan. If required, more specific LOS can be determined Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 9 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx through modeling using Synchro 9.1 (904.125) for signalized, stop-controlled analysis, and roundabout analysis. ➢ Right-hand turn and left-hand turn warrant analysis followed the guidance found in ITD’s Traffic Manual: Idaho’s Supplementary Guide to the MUTCD, which references NCHRP Report 745 –Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections. In addition, the NCHRP 457 – Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide was utilized for right-turn movements. ➢ The traffic volumes were modeled using the Peak Hour Volume (PHV) defined as the highest hourly volume during an average day. ➢ The Design Hourly Volume (DHV) is typically defined as the 30th highest hourly volume in a design year. The choice of the 30th highest hourly volume is a long-held concept which stems from research published in A Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways from the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) in 1965 (pages 54-56). The data from which FIGURE 5 was developed represent a multitude of rural arterials covering a wide range of volumes and geographic conditions. The horizontal axis of the figure indicates the 170 highest number of traffic hours in a typical year of 8,760 total hours. The vertical axis shows the value of the volume of traffic during these hours as a percentage of the average daily traffic (ADT) at the study locations. The vast amount of data points included in the study are bracketed by trend lines that capture the bulk of the results (70 percent as indicated by the curve labels), as shown by the upper and lower curves in the figure. The middle line represents sites that exhibited an average fluctuation in traffic flow. Visually comparing all of the trend lines together indicates that drastic traffic flow changes occurred near the 30th highest hour of the year, as the steepness of the curves indicates between the 1st highest hourly volume and the 30th. For the remainder of the hours between the 30th and the 170th, there is very little change in the slope of the curves, indicating that designing for that 30th hour would cover the expected traffic volume at almost any given hour in a given day of a given week in a given month of a given year. Figure 5 - Relationship of Highest Hourly Volume and ADT on Rural Arterials (The Green Book). Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 10 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx IV. Area Conditions A. Study Area 1. Area of Influence A one-half mile buffer was placed around the proposed development as the area of influence. The area of influence is presented in Figure 6. B. Area of Significant Traffic Impact The area of influence selected for evaluation of traffic impacts is ½ mile surrounding the proposed development. The areas that will be studied are: 3. Intersection #1 – W. 2000 North and N. 2000 West. 4. Intersection #2 – W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West. COPPER HEIGHTS ½ MILE RADIUS FROM ENTRANCE Figure 6 – Area of Influence Associated with Proposed Development (Madison County GIS). Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 11 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx C. Study Area Land Use 1. Existing Land Uses The current land use is agricultural interspersed with residential development. The City of Rexburg is a growing city located about two miles south and one mile east of the proposed development. The use can be observed in the various figures presented and in viewing the parcels using various commercial mapping platforms available to the public such as Google Earth, Bing Maps, and the Teton County GIS parcel viewer. 2. Existing Zoning According to the Teton County zoning map, the parcel is zoned Transitional Agriculture (TAG) with density of one unit per two acres as is all the land surrounding the proposed development. The use of the land reflects the TAG zone with an average density of one unit per 1.08 acres. 3. Anticipated Future Development There may be other developments considered in the area surrounding the proposed development. However, those are not known to the owners of proposed development and will not be considered in the analyses. D. Site Accessibility 1. Site Access The proposed development proposed three approaches: one on W.2000 North, one on N. 3000 West, and one interconnection to Sunrise Meadows subdivision on Robison Drive. a. Road Network Functional Classification. Idaho Transportation Department The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) classifies both W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West as a major collector. In the manual Idaho Transportation Department Systems Procedures published in 2016, Chapter 3.0 Functional Classifications, ITD defines a Minor Arterial as thus: Minor arterials provide service for trips of moderate length, serve geographic areas that are smaller than their higher arterial counterparts and offer connectivity to the higher arterial system. Through a series of routes, they are expected to provide for relatively high, overall travel speeds with minimum interference to through movement. Minor arterials interconnect and augment the higher arterial system, provide intra-community connectivity and may carry local bus routes. They should be identified and spaced at intervals consistent with population density, so that all developed areas are within a reasonable distance of a higher-level arterial. The same publication defines a collector as follows: Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 12 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Collector streets provide both land access and traffic circulation for residential, commercial, and industrial areas. Their access function is more important than that of arterials, and unlike arterials, their operation is not always dominated by traffic signals. Collectors are broken down into two categories: Major Collectors and Minor Collectors. Collectors generally serve intra- county travel (rather than statewide) and constitute those routes on which (independent of traffic volume) predominant travel distances are shorter than on arterial routes; consequently, more moderate speeds may be posted. The distinctions between major collectors and minor collectors are often subtle. Generally, major collector routes are longer in length, have lower connecting driveway density, have higher speed limits, are spaced at greater intervals, have higher annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes and may have more travel lanes than their minor collector counterparts. Madison County For access guidelines, refer to the Road Classification Map published by Madison County (See Appendix C). Madison County labels both W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West as major arterials. Figure 7: Road Functional Classification, Madison County (excerpt from 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update) Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 13 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx The 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan defines an arterial as: Arterials - Arterial facilities are provided to primarily serve through-traffic movement. While some land-access service may be accommodated, it is clearly a minor function. All traffic controls and the facility design are intended to provide efficient through movement. Main Street and 2nd East are Arterial Streets. (2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update) 2. Access Management Access management is intended to facilitate safe and convenient access and circulation for vehicular traffic, pedestrians, and bicycles within a jurisdiction. Access management for the state highway system intended to provide safe transit for reginal and interstate traffic. As such, the objectives of access management within a city or county can sometimes be different than those for a state highway system. a. Idaho Transportation Department This project does not require direct access to the road network owned and maintained by t he Idaho Transportation Department. b. Madison County Access management for Madison County is governed by the Madison County Road and Bridge Department and the design standards. A review of that publication does not reveal any specific requirements for access management. 3. Location and Design Standards for Approaches Madison County has jurisdiction for the location and design standards for approaches on both roads accessed by the proposed development. c. Access Spacing The Madison County Code, Chapter 1115-Subdivisions, Article III – Design Standards, Section 115-57 – Streets and Roads Location, Paragraph (2) Arrangement of Streets, Subparagraph b – Overall Grid, Subparagraph 2 – Collectors, defines the spacing for approaches onto collector roads. Collector roads. Full-movement intersections of collector or local roads with county farm-to- market roads shall be provided in intervals between 1,056 and 1,320 feet (one-quarter mile), along county farm-to-market roads, with no more than 4 access points/intersections per linear mile. The planning commission may approve modifications in the instance of unusual topographic or natural features that prevent the meeting of this required spacing. Intersections should match up with the overall county 10-block per mile address grid whenever possible. d. Corner Clearance Similarly, the Madison County Code stipulates a minimum clear sight distance that allows each vehicle to be visible to the driver of another vehicle when each is 125 feet from the center of an intersection. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 14 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx e. Approach Alignment Also from the Madison County Code, whenever possible, approaches should intersect at right angles and be aligned with the existing approaches to facilitate safety and the development of turn lanes. f. Width and Radius The Madison County Code does not specifically define the width of an approach onto their road network. However, they do define the ROW width for a collector road at 68 feet and a residential road at 50 feet. 4. Area Transportation Elements and Roadway System a. Existing Roadway Network There are two (2) main roadways traversing the area of influence: W. 2000 North on the north side of the development and N. 3000 West on the west side of the development. If we reference the 2015 Madison County Transportation Plan (See Appendix C), we can discern the functional classification of the existing road network and determine some characteristics for the roads in the area of impact for this development. ➢ W. 2000 North: This roadway serves as a major arterial with one travel lane in each direction. W. 2000 North has a speed limit of 45 mph in the area of influence with no bicycle or pedestrian facilities. ➢ N. 3000 West. This roadway serves as a major arterial with one travel lane in each direction. N. 3000 West has a speed limit of 35 mph in the area of influence with no bicycle or pedestrian facilities. b. Transit Service There are not any public transit services in the area. c. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities There are no bicycle or pedestrian facilities on the roads in the vicinity of the development. d. Future Other than the roads for the proposed development, according to the Madison County Transportation Plan, the only planned improvement in the area is an improvement to the intersection of W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 15 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx 5. Accident History a. ITD Crash Data According to the Idaho Local Road Crash Data that was obtained from the Local Highway Technical Assistance Council (LHTAC) there have been one (16) crashes within the influence area of this study between 2015 and 2019 as depicted in Figure 9 (also see Appendix E) Figure 8 - LHTAC Crash Data 2015-2019 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 16 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx A summary describing the year, severity, driver action and the event if presented in the following table. Table IV-1 - Crash Data near Project Site from 2015 to 2019 (LHTAC). There were no reported fatalities at the study area intersections between 2015 and 2019. Year Severity Intersection Driver Action Impaired Most Harmful Event Events 2015 C Injury Accident Y-Intersection Going Straight FALSE Side Swipe Same Side Swipe Same, 2015 Property Dmg Report T-Intersection Going Straight FALSE Same Direction Turning Same Direction Turning, 2015 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Fence Loss of Control, Traffic Sign Support, Other Post, Pole or Support, Fence, Other Fixed Object, 2015 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Rear-End Rear-End, 2016 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Backing FALSE Side Swipe Same 2016 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Rear-End Rear-End, 2017 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Negotiating Curve FALSE Embankment Loss of Control, Ran Off Road, Came Back on Road, Ran Off Road, Embankment, 2017 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Ditch Ran Off Road, Ditch, 2018 Property Dmg Report Four-way Intersection Going Straight FALSE Side Swipe Opposite Side Swipe Opposite, 2018 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight TRUE Ditch Ran Off Road, Ditch, 2018 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Ditch Loss of Control, Ditch, 2018 C Injury Accident Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Rear-End Rear-End, 2019 Property Dmg Report Y-Intersection Going Straight FALSE Guardrail End Guardrail End, 2019 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Negotiating Curve FALSE Overturn Loss of Control, Overturn, 2019 Property Dmg Report Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Animal - Domestic Angle, Animal - Domestic, 2019 B Injury Accident Not at intersection Going Straight FALSE Fence Ran Off Road, Fence, Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 17 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx V. Existing 2020 Traffic Volumes and Conditions A. Traffic Forecasting There are diverse ways to forecast future traffic flow and patterns. A common forecasting method is to take the historic population and forecast the traffic from those values. However, in this situation, recreation and tourism is a major factor, therefore using traffic data trends from ITD and Madison County traffic counts will provide more satisfactory results from which to draw conclusions and make recommendations for mitigation. This study will use traffic data obtained from the ITD to det ermine traffic conditions for the 2020 (existing), 2025 (Project buildout), and the 2040 (Future) horizon years. B. Analysis of Existing 2020 Traffic Conditions Within the area of influence there will be two (2) roadway segments (W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West) and two (2) intersections examined. The segments will be analyzed with the intersections. The intersections are: 1. Intersection #1 – W. 2000 North and N. 2000 West. 2. Intersection #2 – W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West. 1. Existing Traffic Volumes This section discusses the ADT, the peak hour flows, and the trip distribution for the existing traffic. a. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Monthly Average Daily Traffic (MADT) The average daily traffic (ADT) is extracted from the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update (Madison County 2015 TMP in Appendix E) document and supported by traffic counts performed by ITD over the past four years at various intersections within Madison County including those in the vicinity of the project. The projected 2020 ADT counts from the 2015 TMP are illustrated in the following figure. Figure 9: Project 2020 ADT (Madison County 2015 Transportation Master Plan). Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 18 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx The ADT reported in the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update is for W. 2000 North between the two referenced intersections is 1,432 (See Appendix E) The ITD traffic counts are presented in the following figure: The value of 1,750 for W. 2000 North was collected in 2019. This is less than the 2020 projected value the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update of 2,800 but more than the 1,432 counted in 2015. To account for an additional year, in this analysis the 2020 value for AADT for W. 2000 North will be 1,800. The AADT for N. 3000 West can be estimated from the value of 2,000 projected for 2020 in the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update by adjusting it similar to that for W. 2000 North, which results in an AADT of 1,285. ➢ AADT W. 2000 North – 1,800 ➢ AADT N. 3000 West – 1.285 b. Peak Hour Traffic The Peak Hour (PH) traffic can be extracted from the ITD traffic counts and is depicted on the following figure. Figure 10: ITD Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Traffic Counts (ITD). 2000 W N - 2,678 S – 2,646 2000 N E -667 W – 583 2000 N TOTAL 192 3000 W TOTAL 1,231 2000 N TOTAL 1,750 2000 N TOTAL 1,060 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 19 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx The Peak Hour volume for each of the two roads included in the analysis is: ➢ PH: W. 2000 North = 176 ➢ PH: N. 3000 West = 138 2. Existing 2020 Traffic Conditions a. Segment At the time of this study, the free flow speed (FFS) was not available for the specific road segment being analyzed. Therefore, in order to determine the LOS for the road segment through this area, the volume to capacity ratio (v/c ratio) will be used. In order to determine the v/c ratio, we divide the volume of the roadway by the capacity. According to the Highway Capacity Manual, the capacity of a two-lane highway is 1,700 vehicles per hour for each direction of travel. By dividing the peak hour by the peak hour capacity, we get a v/c ratio. The following table shows the correlation between the v/c ratio and the LOS. Figure 11: ITD Peak Hour Traffic (PH) Traffic Counts (ITD). 2000 W PM N - 280 AM S – 352 2000 N AM E -74 PM W – 86 2000 N AM - 19 PM - 30 3000 W AM – 131 PM - 120 2000 N AM - 147 PM - 176 2000 N AM – 92 PM - 138 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 20 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Table V-1 Level of Service Criteria for General Two-Lane Highway Segments Existing 2020 W. 2000 North Peak Hour It was found earlier that the monthly average peak hour flow for the road was 176 (which includes both directions of travel). Dividing that volume by 1,700 vph, the v/c ratio is 0.10. The terrain within the study area is considered level and a 60% no passing zone will be used. This results in a LOS of B. However, if we reference the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update (See Appendix C) the LOS is reported as A. This is likely the case as the actual LOS is calculated based on the peak hour volume for a single direction and our calculations included the traffic volume for both directions. Existing 2020 N. 3000 West Peak Hour It was found earlier that the monthly average peak hour flow for the road was 13 8 (which includes both directions of travel). Dividing that volume by 1,700 vph, the v/c ratio is 0.08. The terrain within the study area is considered level and a 60% no passing zone will be used. This results in a LOS of B. However, if we reference the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update (See Appendix C) the LOS is reported as A. This is likely the case as the actual LOS is calculated based on the peak hour volume for a single direction and our calculations included the traffic volume for both directions. Existing 2020 Peak Hour Conclusions If we allocate the total traffic on the road as 2/3 in the predominant direction and 1/3 in the opposite direction, we can calculate a v/c ratio and assign the LOS base on the aforementioned table. Table V-2 – Level of Service for Existing Conditions 2020 Segment Direction of Travel Time of Day Peak Hour v/c Ratio LOS W. 2000 North Eastbound AM 147 x 2/3 = 98 0.06 A W. 2000 North Westbound PM 176 x 2/3 = 117 0.07 A N. 3000 West Northbound PM 138 x 2/3 = 92 0.05 A N. 3000 West Southbound AM 92 x 2/3 = 61 0.04 A Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 21 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Mitigation Measures Since the worst LOS is an A, no improvements are warranted for the existing conditions. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 22 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx VI. Projected Traffic A. Site Traffic It is anticipated that buildout of the development will be complete by 2025. 1. Trip Generation In order to determine the trips generated by the proposed development, the ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition Manual was used. According to information provided by the Owner, buildout of the subdivision will be 24-lots and buildout will be assumed to be in 2025. b. Buildout (2025) The following two (2) tables show the land use and trip generation for the ADT and the peak hour. Table VI-1- Land Use and Trip Generation (AADT) for Buildout (2025) Table VI-2- Land Use and Trip Generation (Peak Hour) for Buildout (2025) 2. Trip Distribution Trip distribution is a percentage indicating what percentage of traffic is entering or exiting the study area. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook Second Edition outlines the trip distribution for each land use. The following table shows the breakdown of the trip distribution. c. Buildout (2025) The tables above also display the trip distribution for AADT and Peak Hour for the buildout year in 2025. 3. Modal Split Modal split is the determination of different travel modes (automobile, heavy vehicles, walk, etc.) from an origin to a given destination. Analyzing the pedestrian traffic is outside the scope of this study and it is assumed that no heavy vehicles will be generated from the development. A 5% heavy vehicle percentage will be applied to this study. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 23 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx 4. Trip Assignment It is assumed that 50% of the generated traffic from the subdivision will utilize the W. 2000 North approach and the other 50% will utilize the N. 3000 West approach. Given the location of the Hibbard Elementary School and the proximity of the City of Rexburg, it is reasonable to assume that once traffic has exited the subdivision, the direction of travel will be consistent with the ITD observations wherein 2/3 of the traffic will travel in the primary direction based on the A.M. or P.M. peak and the other 1/3 will travel in the opposite direction. Table VI-3 – Peak Hour Trip Assignment per Approach and Direction of Travel, B. Through Traffic (Non-Site Traffic) 1. Non-Site Traffic for anticipated Development in Study Area d. Method of Projections Pass-by trips are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a destination without a route diversion. In other words, a pass-by trip is when the traffic on an adjacent roadway is attracted to a certain land use in a development as non-site traffic. The trip generally goes from origin to generator and then returns to the origin. The proposed development does not have any land uses that would be considered pass-by trips. e. Trip Distribution This section is not applicable due to the fact that single-family detached housing is not considered a non- site traffic generator. f. Modal Split This section is not applicable due to the fact that single-family detached housing is not considered a non- site traffic generator. g. Trip Assignment This section is not applicable due to the fact that single-family detached housing is not considered a non- site traffic generator. Segment Time of Day Peak Hour Trips Trip Allocation Trips per Approach Direction of Travel Direction Allocation Number Trips W. 2000 North AM 46 50 % 23 Eastbound 2/3 15 46 50 % 23 Westbound 1/3 8 W. 2000 North PM 61 50 % 30 Eastbound 1/3 10 61 50 % 30 Westbound 2/3 20 N. 3000 West AM 46 50 % 23 Northbound 1/3 8 46 50 % 23 Southbound 2/3 15 N. 3000 West PM 61 50 % 30 Northbound 2/3 20 61 50 % 30 Southbound 1/3 10 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 24 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx VII. 2025 Horizon Year Traffic Analysis (Buildout) A. On-Site Development Buildout is assumed to be complete by the year 2025. B. Roadway Network Within the area of influence there will be two (2) roadway segments (W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West) and two (2) intersections examined. The segments will be analyzed with the intersections. The intersections are: 1. Intersection #1 – W. 2000 North and N. 2000 West. 2. Intersection #2 – W. 2000 North and N. 3000 West. C. Traffic Volumes a. 2025 Background Segment Traffic Volumes The background traffic is basically the existing traffic forecasted to a horizon year. 2025 Background Segment Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Using the population growth formula (P=Poert) and an assumed growth rate of 3%, we calculate the forecasted traffic volumes for the horizon years. The following table shows the 2020 and forecasted 2025 AADT traffic counts that will be used throughout this study. ➢ AADT W. 2000 North – 2,091 ➢ AADT N. 3000 West – 1.493 The trip distribution volumes for both roads, each direction, per previously discussed protocols are listed in the following table. Table VII-1 Forecasted 2025 Segment AADT and Trip Distribution Volumes 2025 Background Segment Peak Hour Traffic (PH) Using the population growth formula (P=Poert) and an assumed growth rate of 3%, we calculate the forecasted traffic volumes for the horizon years. The following table shows the 2020 and forecasted 2025 peak hour traffic counts that will be used throughout this study. ➢ PH: W. 2000 North, AM– 171 ➢ PH: W. 2000 North, PM– 204 ➢ PH: N. 3000 West, PM - 160 Segment Direction of Travel AADT 2020 AADT 2025 W. 2000 North Eastbound AM 1200 1395 W. 2000 North Westbound AM 600 696 N. 3000 West Northbound PM 419 497 N. 3000 West Southbound PM 839 996 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 25 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx ➢ PH: N. 3000 West, AM – 107 The trip distribution volumes for both roads, each direction, per previously discussed protocols are listed in the following table. Table VII-2 Forecasted 2025 Segment Peak Hour and Trip Distribution Volumes b. 2025 Background Plus Site Traffic Volumes 2025 Background Segment Plus Site Traffic Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) The development will add two intersections to the network. The site traffic outlined in the previous chapter was added to the 2025 background traffic with the results shown in the following figures. 2025 Background Segment Plus Site Traffic Peak Hour Traffic (PH) The site traffic outlined in the previous chapter was added to the 2025 background traffic with the results shown in the following figures. D. 2025 Traffic Conditions c. Segment At the time of this study, the free flow speed (FFS) was not available for the specific road segment being analyzed. Therefore, in order to determine the LOS for the road segment through this area, the volume to capacity ratio (v/c ratio) will be used. In order to determine the v/c ratio, we divide the volume of the roadway by the capacity. According to the Highway Capacity Manual, the capacity of a two-lane Segment Direction of Travel PH 2025 PH 2025 W. 2000 North Eastbound AM 107 136 W. 2000 North Westbound PM 136 158 N. 3000 West Northbound PM 107 124 N. 3000 West Southbound AM 72 83 Segment Direction of Travel Background AADT 2025 AADT Development Total AADT 2025 W. 2000 North Eastbound AM 1395 191 1586 W. 2000 North Westbound AM 696 96 782 N. 3000 West Northbound PM 497 96 593 N. 3000 West Southbound PM 996 191 1187 Segment Direction of Travel Background PH 2025 2025 PH Development Total PH 2025 W. 2000 North Eastbound AM 136 10 146 W. 2000 North Westbound PM 158 20 178 N. 3000 West Northbound PM 124 20 144 N. 3000 West Southbound AM 83 10 93 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 26 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx highway is 1,700 vehicles per hour for each direction of travel. By dividing the peak hour by the peak hour capacity, we get a v/c ratio. The following table shows the correl ation between the v/c ratio and the LOS. Table VII-3 Level of Service Criteria for General Two-Lane Highway Segments 2025 Background Segment Plus Site Traffic W. 2000 North Peak Hour It was found earlier that the monthly average peak hour flow for the road was 204 (which includes both directions of travel). Dividing that volume by 1,700 vph, the v/c ratio is 0.12. The terrain within the study area is considered level and a 60% no passing zone will be used. This results in a LOS of B. However, if we reference the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update (See Appendix F) the LOS is reported as A. This is likely the case as the actual LOS is calcu lated based on the peak hour volume for a single direction and our calculations included the traffic volume for both directions. 2025 Background Segment Plus Site Traffic N. 3000 West Peak Hour It was found earlier that the monthly average peak hour flow for the road was 160 (which includes both directions of travel). Dividing that volume by 1,700 vph, the v/c ratio is 0.09. The terrain within the study area is considered level and a 60% no passing zone will be used. This results in a LOS of B. However, if we reference the 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update (See Appendix F) the LOS is reported as A. This is likely the case as the actual LOS is calculated based on the peak hour volume for a single direction and our calculations included the traffic volume for both directions. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 27 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Existing 2020 Peak Hour Conclusions If we allocate the total traffic on the road as 2/3 in the predominant direction and 1/3 in the opposite direction, we can calculate a v/c ratio and assign the LOS base on the aforementioned table. Table VII-4 – Level of Service for Background Plus Site Traffic 2025 Mitigation Measures Since the worst LOS is a B, no improvements are warranted for the existing conditions. We should also consider the LOS projected in the 2015 Madison County Master Transportation Plan Update which lists both road as a LOS A. d. Turn Lane Warrants Based on Safety Analysis of Intersections The intersection was also evaluated for safety using ITD guidelines which recommend using the National Cooperative Highway Research Report 745 – Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections (NCHRP 745) to evaluate left-hand turns and National Cooperative Highway Research Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide (NCHRP 457) to evaluate right-turn movements to determine if turning movements are consistent with national standards for safety based on traffic volumes. 2025 Segment Background Plus Site Traffic W. 2000 North Peak Hour The analysis showed that for the buildout condition in 2025, the intersection of W. 2000 North and the new subdivision approach warrants a left-hand turn lane for westbound traffic. It does not warrant a right-hand turn for southbound traffic. 2025 Segment Background Plus Site Traffic N. 3000 East Peak Hour The analysis showed that for the buildout condition in 2025, the intersection of N. 3000 West and the subdivision approach does not warrant a left-hand turn lane for southbound traffic. It also does not warrant a right-hand turn for southbound traffic. 2. Recommendations to Accommodate the 2025 Background plus Site Traffic From this analysis it can be seen that both the segments and the intersections are forecasted to operate at acceptable levels although a left turn from W. 2000 North into the subdivision is recommended for safety reasons. No improvements are warranted to accommodate the background plus the site traffic for the 2025 Horizon Year. Segment Direction of Travel Time of Day Peak Hour v/c Ratio LOS W. 2000 North Eastbound AM 171 x 2/3 = 146 0.08 B W. 2000 North Westbound PM 204 x 2/3 = 178 0.10 B N. 3000 West Northbound PM 138 x 2/3 = 92 0.05 A N. 3000 West Southbound AM 92 x 2/3 = 61 0.04 A Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 28 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx a. Turn Lane Warrant Analysis A left turn into the subdivision for westbound traffic from W. 2000p North is warranted as a result of the development project. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 29 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx VIII. Conclusions. After evaluating the proposed development within the context of zoning; projected land use; existing transportation system; background traffic counts for the principal roadways within the study impact area; projected traffic for horizon years corresponding with project opening, project buildout, the findings of the Traffic Impact Study are summarized below. A. Existing Traffic Conditions (2020) For the existing traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, the road segments are within minimum operational thresholds. Therefore, no improvement alternatives are proposed to mitigate existing (2020) traffic for the segments or the two new intersections to meet the required minimum operational threshold except consideration of a left-hand turn for westbound traffic W. 2000 North into the subdivision. B. Build-Out Year (2025) 1. Land Use and Trip Generation a. Land Use The projected land use for the build-out year of the proposed development is 58 single-family homes. All other uses remain the same as the existing conditions. a. Trip Generation The build-out conditions are expected to generate approximately 574 total trips for the AADT and 61 trips during PM peak hour by year 2025. Build-out site traffic is anticipated to have the following general distribution patterns: ➢ 50% exiting north onto W. 2000 North. • 2/3 turning east toward Rexburg. • 1/3 turning west toward Hibbard. ➢ 50% exiting west onto N. 3000 West. • 2/3 turning south toward Rexburg. • 1/3 turning north toward Hibbard. 2. Background Traffic Conditions The 2025 roadway network in the study area remains the same as existing. a. W. 2000 North Segment For the 2025 background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements the W. 2000 North meets minimum operational thresholds. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 30 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Mitigating Measures No mitigating measures are recommended. b. N. 3000 West Segment For the 2025 background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements the N. 3000 West Segment meets minimum operational thresholds. Mitigating Measures No mitigating measures are recommended. 3. Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions c. W. 2000 North Segment For the 2025 site traffic plus background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements the N. 3000 West Segment meets minimum operational thresholds except a left turn for westbound traffic into the subdivision is warranted based on safety considerations. Mitigating Measures A left turn lane into the subdivision for westbound traffic is recommended. d. N. 3000 West Segment For the 2025 site traffic plus background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements the N. 3000 West segment meets minimum operational thresholds. Mitigating Measures No mitigating measures are recommended. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix A Preliminary Plat Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix B Executive Summary - 2015 Madison County Transportation Master Plan Update ii Madison County /City of Rexburg/Sugar City Transportation Master Plan Update 2015 Executive Summary Introduction The Madison County transportation systems spans a diverse landscape and serves a variety of users. Although airports and railroads serve an important role in the transportation system, roadways are the most widely used and most important feature of the transportation system. Daily commuters, farm-to- market truck haulers, recreation for local as well as regional travelers use the roadway system in Madison County every day. As we remember what the road system has been in the past and what it is today, we envision what the County current and impending needs are, and look to the future. What will the transportation system be for our grandchildren and their grandchildren? Will decisions made today have a lasting impact on decisions they make to live and work in Madison County. The area is growing with a thriving University and a desire by businesses to locate in Madison County. Over the next 25 years it is anticipated that the number and mix of roadway users will continue to grow. Transportation that accommodates this growth will ensure the continuation of the strong economic vitality and exceptional quality of life which currently exists in Madison County. Existing Roadway Network The existing roadway network consists of local, collector and arterial streets as well as the state highway US-20. Each of these roadway classifications serves a different yet important function in the roadway system. Traffic volume and turning movement data was collected throughout the County to establish a baseline of existing traffic volumes. These volumes were compared to the capacity of the individual roadways in the network to determine any existing deficiencies. Level of Service (LOS) is a performance metric used by the Federal Highway Administration to categorize congestion on roadways. A letter grade A, B, and C being acceptable. LOS D, E, and F are considered unacceptable. Every roadway segment in the County is operating at an acceptable level of service. There are however, a number of intersections that are experiencing excessive delays. These are as follows: • 2nd East and Teton Village Road • 2nd East and the Walmart Entrance • US-20 Ramps at Main Street • US-20 Ramps at University Boulevard Several bridges in the area are in need of attention according to the National Bridge Inventory Database. Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) owns 32 bridges in Madison County, one of which is structurally deficient and one of which is functionally obsolete. The County owns 39 bridges, three are structurally deficient and two are eligible for federal aid with a sufficiency rating of less than fifty. The Twin Bridges are also in need of channel correction. The City of Rexburg maintains 8 bridges, of which one is structurally deficient and one is federal aid eligible. The only bridge in Sugar City is functionally obsolete. In addition to roadways, the jointly owned Rexburg-Madison County airport is operational and serves primarily private and agricultural aircraft. A committee currently exists to evaluate future airport needs iii Madison County /City of Rexburg/Sugar City Transportation Master Plan Update 2015 and the potential for relocation as an expansion becomes necessary. There are 52 miles of railroad along the Yellowstone branch of the Eastern Idaho Railroad. This stretch moves more than 35,000 car loads per year to the Union Pacific branches. Future Conditions Future traffic patterns and the resulting operating conditions of a roadway network are directly related to land use planning and socioeconomic conditions. Socioeconomic data were gathered from the Cities, County, BYU-I and other stakeholders in the area to ensure the best available data were used. Transportation planning in the region should be a cooperative effort of state and local agencies. One of the purposes of the newly formed RPO is to coordinate this transportation planning process in Madison County. A large part of the coordinated planning process was the development of a regional travel demand model. This model will serve as a planning tool for the County and RPO for years to come. The travel demand model was the basis for the analysis of future traffic growth in the County and helped determine not only the expected problems caused by growth but also the effectiveness of the proposed solutions to those problems. Three planning years were evaluated; 2020, 2030, and 2040. Growth in the County is expected to continue through these years with populations reaching 46,000 in 2020, 55,000 in 2030, and 64,000 by the year 2040. This growth will significantly influence the roadway network and, as shown in the no-build scenarios presented in this report, will result in unacceptable congestion in the area. Several projects were identified as part of the planning process and range from signal timing projects to interchange reconstructions. Current projects will seek to solve problems such as geometric deficiencies, pedestrian safety, intersection operational failure, and over congested roadways. In addition to the three planning years studied, a vision scenario was developed to identify potential problems which are likely to occur once the County population exceeds the 64,000 threshold set for the year 2040. These projects include the East Parkway Corridor, 5th West Extension and US-20 overpasses at Moody Road, Poleline Road, and 7th South. These vision projects should considered by the RPO as development and growth occurs. A total of 22 intersections were studied in depth as part of the TMP. The intersections were evaluated for safety, geometric, and capacity insufficiencies. Of the 22, seven are currently over capacity. Seven have geometric or safety concerns, and 11 (including the original seven) are expected to be over capacity by 2040. Rural Madison County Improvements Many of the improvements in and around the City of Rexburg are driven by travel demand and the projected congestion that will occur with the growth. For the rest of the County, including Sugar City, the existing system will provide a projected LOS A through the year 2040. Although not driven by travel demand, the connectivity, safety and utility of the rural part of the County has been studied. A capital improvement plan has been developed for the rural areas of the Counties and priorities have been developed based a consensus of the most pressing needs by input of the public and stakeholders. iv Madison County /City of Rexburg/Sugar City Transportation Master Plan Update 2015 Details of the major improvements proposed in the TMP are included in the body of this report. A list is provided here for reference: • US-20 and State Highway 33 • US-20 West Side Frontage • US-20 East Side Frontage • Spot intersection locations throughout the County Alternative Modes of Transportation Alternative transportation modes are an important part of the overall transportation system. A complete transit system may include bus, bus rapid transit (BRT), light rail, commuter rail, and van share facilities. Non-motorized traffic includes pedestrians, bicyclists, hikers, horseback riders, and joggers/walkers. These modes of transportation are very important and should be accommodated in a vibrant and sustainable transportation system as they become appropriate for the community. It has long been discussed that a vibrant bus system within the community could become a vital link to expanding access to the University for students. A transit system, particularly within the City of Rexburg should be considered in the future plans of the community. While many transit options exist, the most viable and affordable option for the area would be a fixed schedule bus system. The exact location and timing of the bus routes will require further study. The Community Transportation Association of America public transit start-up feasibility study will form part of this further analysis. Pedestrians and Bicyclists are an essential element to the transportation master plan. The City of Rexburg has a high volume of pedestrian activity in and around the BYUI campus. Sidewalks should be considered a priority for any new roadways or capacity improvements. Improving the sidewalk connectivity between the downtown area and the campus is essential. Regional bike plans exist and should be used to determine the most appropriate location for bike lanes and trails within the County. Each of the roadway cross sections should include the ability to accommodate bicyclists either with on-street facilities such as bike lanes or “sharrows” or off-street facilities such as multi-use pathways and trails. Other Elements of the Transportation Master Plan Traffic Impact Studies should be required for all developments that may have a detrimental impact on the transportation network. Traffic Impact Studies give the County and Cities the ability to determine what effects a proposed development will have on the street network and how to plan accordingly. Guidelines to when and where a Traffic Impact Study is required are given in the appendix of this report. The guidelines also show the information that should be included in the study. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) can greatly improve the function of any roadway. ITS elements include signal detection, traffic volume recorders, traffic cameras, variable message signs, and advanced warning signs. Each of these elements allow traffic engineers to monitor traffic patterns and adjust to maximize traffic flows accordingly. The ITS can also provide valuable information to the traveling public to assist in travel decisions. A traffic operations center should be set up in the County to monitor the proposed ITS elements. v Madison County /City of Rexburg/Sugar City Transportation Master Plan Update 2015 Access Management is a standard or set of guidelines used to control access on major roads. Controlling access improves the safety of a roadway and increases capacity. The State of Idaho has an access management program for the state roads. It is recommended that the County adopt the same standards for locally owned roads of similar function. Madison County must be an integral player in regional planning. The formation of the RPO has taken a large step in the right direction to accomplish this goal. The County must continue to work with ITD and neighboring jurisdictions to guarantee that transportation planning is all encompassing. Many of the projects identified in this report will not be needed for 10, 20, or perhaps 30 years. It is vital that the County takes the necessary steps now to prepare for these projects. The simplest way to make sure that these projects are still possible in the future is through Corridor Preservation. This is a technique used to preserve areas of Right-of-Way, with sufficient width to accommodate a future planned roadway. As rural areas develop, the County and Cities must be proactive in procuring the necessary right-of-way for planned projects as it becomes available. Maintaining access management standards on these corridors is also important. Travel Demand Management is the practice of encouraging people out of single occupancy vehicle use. Several strategies exist and could be employed by the members of the RPO including a ride share program, transit, incentives for carpooling, variable work schedules, etc. Traffic Calming and Safety are also an important part of any transportation network. Ensuring the safety of motorists and pedestrians should be the highest priority on any transportation project. Traffic calming can help reduce speeds and volumes on roadways, but should be used with caution and only where appropriate. A guide to traffic calming is provided in this report. Capital Facilities Plan The most important element of the TMP is the Capital Facilities Plan. This section of the report includes all of the recommended projects to mitigate any existing and future transportation deficiencies. The report includes the nature of each project, the timing of the project and a planning level cost estimate for each project. The total cost of all of the proposed capital improvement projects combined for ITD, the Cities and the County in Madison County, excluding those already programmed or completed, is $58,911,000. Public Involvement In addition to multiple updates to the Madison County commissioners and the members of the Rexburg City Council, the public was also invited to attend a series of two public meetings. The meetings allowed the public to express ideas and concerns related to the topics presented. The meetings were advertised via web site, television, radio, and via social media. Receipt of social media invitations confirmed that more than 12,000 residents of Madison County were able to open and view the invitation. In addition, Kelly Hoopes of Horrocks Engineers discussed the project and the intent of the master plan update on local television news channels on two different occasions. The first public meeting was held on April 1, 2015 in the Madison County Commissioners chambers. The second meeting was held the following night on April 2, 2015 in the City of Rexburg City Council chambers. vi Madison County /City of Rexburg/Sugar City Transportation Master Plan Update 2015 Each meeting presented the same information in an open house format. Exhibits of the various discoveries and alternatives of the study were presented. Many in attendance came simply to learn with no comments. Others expressed comments verbally and in writing. The primary concern expressed by the majority of attendees was the congestion on 2nd East between Main Street and 7th North. The alternative presented as a couplet on 3rd East concerned some residents who live along that corridor. Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix C Existing Transportation System 10 / 2 / 2 0 1 5 Ex i s t i n g N e t w o r k 0. 5 0 0 . 5 Mi l e s $ O : \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ T M P U p d a t e d F i g u r e s 2 \ 0 6 E x i s t i n g N e t w o r k . m x d , 1 0 / 2 / 2 0 1 5 2 : 1 8 : 5 0 P M , S t e v e n L TR B Re x b u r g C i t y M a s t e r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n Le g e n d Fu n c t i o n a l C l a s s Hi g h w a y Ma j o r A r t e r i a l Mi n o r A r t e r i a l Co l l e c t o r Lo c a l / C o u n t y R o a d Re x b u r g C i t y L i m i t s Ma d i s o n C o u n t y B o r d e r DA T E DR A W N 21 6 2 W e s t G r o v e P a r k w a y Su i t e 4 0 0 Pl e a s a n t G r o v e , U T 8 4 0 6 2 (8 0 1 ) 7 6 3 - 5 1 0 0 Se r v i c e L a y e r C r e d i t s : S o u r c e s : E s r i , H E R E , D e L o r m e , T o m T o m , I n t e r m a p , i n c r e m e n t P C o r p . , G E B C O , U S G S , F A O , N P S , N R C A N , G e o B a s e , I G N , K a d a s t e r N L , O r d n a n c e S u r v e y , E s r i J a p a n , M E T I , E s r i C h i n a ( H o n g K o n g ) , s w i s s t o p o , M a p m y I n d i a , © O p e n S t r e e t M a p c o n t r i b u t o r s , a n d t h e G I S U s e r C o m m u n i t y Fi g u r e 1 < 3 0 0 0 3000 43 0 0 33 0 0 870 0 67 0 0 440 0 4100 70 0 0 46 0 0 3100 77 0 0 10600 89 0 0 680 0 570 0 19400 880 0 75 0 0 16800 7800 510 0 17 3 0 0 15500 900 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 46 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 Figure 6 Existing Roadway Level of Service 1 0 1 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ F i n a l F i g u r e M a p s \ 0 6 E x i s t i n g R o a d w a y L O S . m x d , 6 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 5 2 : 0 0 : 4 8 P M , S t e v e n L Madison County Transportation Master Plan DATE 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom Legend Level of Service Acceptable (LOS A-B) Acceptable (LOS C) Local/County Road Rexburg City Limits 4000 Daily Volume < 3000 67 0 0 440 0 70 0 0 46 0 0 77 0 0 10600 89 0 0 680 0 9900 570 0 19400 880 0 75 0 0 16800 7800 4100 510 0 17 3 0 0 15500 23 3 0 0 3500 86 0 0 43 0 0 13 1 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 46 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 16800 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Figure 10 2020 Solutions to Projected Deficiencies 1 0 1 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ F i n a l F i g u r e M a p s \ 1 0 2 0 2 0 S o l u t i o n s . m x d , 6 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 5 3 : 2 6 : 0 5 P M , S t e v e n L Madison County Transportation Master Plan Legend Functional Class Highway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local/County Road Rexburg City Limits DATE 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 2nd EastCapacity ImprovementArea N 1 s t E 6000 77 0 0 1100 0 11 9 0 0 21 0 0 3900 76 0 0 149 0 0 19 0 0 540 0 4100 30 0 20 0 800 90 0 23 0 0 130 0 0 148 0 0 4300 4500 4400 2900 10 0 0 20 0 0 2800 1200 51 0 0 91 0 0 2700 60 0 1100 22 0 0 13 5 0 0 13100 12 5 0 0 16 8 0 0 56 0 0 103 0 0 10 5 0 0 40 0 730 0 18 0 0 12 8 0 0 700 150 0 147 0 0 3600 4000 142 0 0 68 0 0 26 0 0 111 0 0 720 0 5500 29800 970 0 33 1 0 0 24600 10 0 6200 61 0 0 4700 4800 13 0 0 50 0 14 0 0 145 0 0 1000 500 73 0 0 3 0 0 2000 800 300 40 0 800 60 0 2200 700 300 5100 15 0 0 30 0 20 0 0 1500 80 0 1300 30 0 19 0 0 200 800 149 0 0 10 0 10500 30 0 19 0 0 2200 500 10 0 15 0 0 40 0 50 0 80 0 10 0 0 700 60 0 30 0 100 28 0 0 1200 300 20 0 60 0 11 0 0 1500 20 0 51 0 0 1500 1000 2000 3 0 0 Figure 9 Projected 2020 No-Build Level of Service 1 0 1 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ F i n a l F i g u r e M a p s \ 0 9 P r o j e c t e d 2 0 2 0 N o B u i l d L O S . m x d , 6 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 5 2 : 3 7 : 2 3 P M , S t e v e n L Madison County Transportation Master Plan DATE 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom 2020 No-Build Level of ServiceExisting Level of Service LegendLevel of Service Acceptable (LOS A-B) Acceptable (LOS C) Unacceptable (LOS E) Local/County Road Rexburg City Limits 4000 Daily Volume 1100 0 1190 0 540 0 700 20 0 40 0 4500 2900 77 0 0 10 0 0 80 0 12 5 0 0 16 8 0 0 135 0 0 100 103 0 0 10500 7500 30 0 73 0 0 18 0 0 12 8 0 0 3800 1100 3600 4000 2200 26200 163005500 33 1 0 0 60 0 24600 3500 19 0 0 11200 142 0 0 32 7 0 0 26 0 0 4 8 0 0 29800 2000 27 8 0 0 3200 1500 3 0 0 4800 10 0 0 5400 36 0 0 10 5 0 0 2200 2200 10 0 0 10 5 0 0 1500 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix D LHTAC Crash Data County 1000m800600400200004.28.2021 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix E Historical Traffic Volumes Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 07 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 9 to 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 2 4 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 N 3 0 0 0 W R D 0 . 1 M I . N . O F W 3 0 0 0 N R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , J u l 1 4 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , J u l 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , J u l 1 6 , 2 0 1 9 We d , J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , J u l 1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, Jul 19, 2019 Sat, Jul 20, 2019 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 1 1 1 5 01 : 0 0 4 5 02 : 0 0 2 3 03 : 0 0 2 0 04 : 0 0 1 3 05 : 0 0 1 4 2 0 06 : 0 0 5 3 4 8 07 : 0 0 8 1 7 0 08 : 0 0 7 9 8 1 09 : 0 0 7 5 9 1 10 : 0 0 6 5 7 9 11 : 0 0 7 9 8 9 12 : 0 0 7 7 1 0 0 13 : 0 0 8 2 8 9 14 : 0 0 8 6 8 9 15 : 0 0 1 1 7 1 0 1 16 : 0 0 1 1 7 1 0 4 17 : 0 0 1 6 5 1 3 2 18 : 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 19 : 0 0 8 2 8 2 20 : 0 0 8 8 9 5 21 : 0 0 7 7 5 3 22 : 0 0 3 0 3 0 23 : 0 0 3 1 1 7 To t a l 1 , 3 7 0 1 , 5 2 1 1 6 4 AM P e a k V o l 9 0 9 1 AM P e a k F c t .8 0 4 .6 6 9 AM P e a k H r 8: 4 5 9: 0 0 PM P e a k V o l 1 6 5 1 3 7 PM P e a k F c t .8 5 9 .9 2 6 PM P e a k H r 17 : 0 0 17 : 1 5 Se a s o n a l F c t . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 07 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 9: 2 9 A M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 1 , 3 7 5 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 07 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 9 to 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 2 4 - 0 - 3 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 W 3 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . E . O F N 3 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , J u l 1 4 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , J u l 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , J u l 1 6 , 2 0 1 9 We d , J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , J u l 1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, Jul 19, 2019 Sat, Jul 20, 2019 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 3 9 01 : 0 0 1 4 02 : 0 0 1 3 03 : 0 0 2 0 04 : 0 0 0 1 05 : 0 0 1 6 1 1 06 : 0 0 4 0 3 0 07 : 0 0 7 1 7 3 08 : 0 0 5 5 5 6 09 : 0 0 5 3 4 5 10 : 0 0 5 8 5 3 11 : 0 0 8 1 6 8 12 : 0 0 8 5 8 7 13 : 0 0 7 8 6 7 14 : 0 0 7 1 8 1 15 : 0 0 9 3 7 9 16 : 0 0 9 0 9 1 17 : 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 18 : 0 0 7 4 8 9 19 : 0 0 5 8 4 5 20 : 0 0 5 1 5 8 21 : 0 0 4 2 4 9 22 : 0 0 2 2 1 8 23 : 0 0 1 3 1 0 To t a l 1 , 0 3 6 1 , 1 5 0 1 3 1 AM P e a k V o l 8 1 7 3 AM P e a k F c t .7 7 9 .5 8 9 AM P e a k H r 11 : 0 0 7: 1 5 PM P e a k V o l 1 1 6 1 2 0 PM P e a k F c t .8 5 3 .8 5 7 PM P e a k H r 17 : 1 5 17 : 0 0 Se a s o n a l F c t . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 07 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 9: 2 9 A M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 1 , 0 4 3 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 07 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 9 to 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 2 4 - 0 - 5 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 N 3 0 0 0 W R D 0 . 1 M I . S . O F W 3 0 0 0 N R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , J u l 1 4 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , J u l 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , J u l 1 6 , 2 0 1 9 We d , J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , J u l 1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, Jul 19, 2019 Sat, Jul 20, 2019 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 9 9 01 : 0 0 3 4 02 : 0 0 3 4 03 : 0 0 1 0 04 : 0 0 0 2 05 : 0 0 1 4 1 7 06 : 0 0 3 7 3 9 07 : 0 0 6 7 5 6 08 : 0 0 7 5 7 5 6 0 09 : 0 0 6 5 5 8 10 : 0 0 5 3 5 6 11 : 0 0 6 8 7 6 12 : 0 0 5 8 7 3 13 : 0 0 6 3 7 2 14 : 0 0 7 7 7 6 15 : 0 0 1 1 1 9 4 16 : 0 0 1 0 8 1 0 9 17 : 0 0 1 2 7 1 1 3 18 : 0 0 9 5 1 0 1 19 : 0 0 7 3 6 6 20 : 0 0 8 6 8 4 21 : 0 0 7 2 4 6 22 : 0 0 2 7 3 3 23 : 0 0 2 7 1 2 To t a l 1 , 1 8 5 1 , 2 7 8 1 9 1 AM P e a k V o l 8 1 8 2 AM P e a k F c t .7 7 9 .7 8 8 AM P e a k H r 8: 4 5 7: 3 0 PM P e a k V o l 1 2 9 1 1 9 PM P e a k F c t .7 8 7 .7 6 3 PM P e a k H r 17 : 1 5 16 : 1 5 Se a s o n a l F c t . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 07 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 9: 2 9 A M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 1 , 1 6 3 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 07 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 9 to 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 2 4 - 0 - 7 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M i n o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 W 3 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . W . O F N 3 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , J u l 1 4 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , J u l 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , J u l 1 6 , 2 0 1 9 We d , J u l 1 7 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , J u l 1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, Jul 19, 2019 Sat, Jul 20, 2019 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 1 1 01 : 0 0 0 1 02 : 0 0 0 2 03 : 0 0 1 0 04 : 0 0 1 2 05 : 0 0 6 9 06 : 0 0 1 5 1 1 07 : 0 0 3 9 4 1 08 : 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 9 09 : 0 0 3 9 2 0 10 : 0 0 3 6 3 8 11 : 0 0 4 8 4 4 12 : 0 0 6 3 3 6 13 : 0 0 4 5 4 3 14 : 0 0 4 6 4 1 15 : 0 0 5 3 4 3 16 : 0 0 5 4 4 3 17 : 0 0 4 9 5 5 18 : 0 0 3 2 3 8 19 : 0 0 2 8 2 8 20 : 0 0 4 0 4 5 21 : 0 0 2 6 3 0 22 : 0 0 1 4 1 0 23 : 0 0 6 4 To t a l 6 1 9 6 2 5 1 1 6 AM P e a k V o l 4 8 4 8 AM P e a k F c t .6 .6 3 2 AM P e a k H r 11 : 0 0 7: 4 5 PM P e a k V o l 6 3 5 5 PM P e a k F c t .6 0 6 .6 5 5 PM P e a k H r 12 : 0 0 17 : 0 0 Se a s o n a l F c t . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 . 9 0 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 07 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 9: 2 9 A M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 5 9 2 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 th r o u g h 04 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n U M i n o r A r t e r i a l Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 4 99 99 N 1 2 T H W S T 0 . 1 M I . N . O F S H - 3 3 Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , A p r 1 9 , 2 0 2 0 Mo n , A p r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 Tu e , A p r 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 We d , A p r 2 2 , 2 0 2 0 Th u , A p r 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 Fri, Apr 24, 2020 Sat, Apr 25, 2020 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 2 3 2 8 01 : 0 0 1 1 1 1 02 : 0 0 4 3 03 : 0 0 8 1 0 04 : 0 0 1 6 1 4 05 : 0 0 2 2 3 0 06 : 0 0 8 6 9 5 07 : 0 0 3 1 0 2 3 8 08 : 0 0 3 2 8 3 0 1 09 : 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 9 10 : 0 0 3 1 7 2 8 7 11 : 0 0 2 8 6 3 1 2 12 : 0 0 3 8 1 4 0 0 13 : 0 0 3 5 7 4 0 7 14 : 0 0 3 4 5 3 7 2 15 : 0 0 3 9 2 3 9 0 16 : 0 0 4 3 8 3 8 4 17 : 0 0 5 3 9 4 2 4 18 : 0 0 3 8 0 3 4 6 19 : 0 0 3 1 7 2 9 3 20 : 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 6 21 : 0 0 1 3 8 1 0 9 22 : 0 0 8 4 7 8 23 : 0 0 3 1 5 3 To t a l 4 , 8 9 7 5 , 1 5 1 4 2 9 AM P e a k V o l 3 3 5 AM P e a k F c t .5 4 7 AM P e a k H r : 7: 2 0 PM P e a k V o l 5 3 9 4 4 7 PM P e a k F c t .7 8 8 .7 3 PM P e a k H r 17 : 0 0 16 : 5 0 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 Da i l y F c t . 9 4 0 . 9 3 8 . 9 3 6 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 03 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 1 Cr e a t e d 2: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 6 , 8 3 9 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 th r o u g h 04 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 1 - 0 - 3 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n U P r i n c i p a l A r t e r i a l - O t h e r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 4 99 99 W M A I N S T ( S H - 3 3 ) 0 . 1 M I . E . O F 1 2 T H W S T Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , A p r 1 9 , 2 0 2 0 Mo n , A p r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 Tu e , A p r 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 We d , A p r 2 2 , 2 0 2 0 Th u , A p r 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 Fri, Apr 24, 2020 Sat, Apr 25, 2020 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 4 8 01 : 0 0 1 4 02 : 0 0 8 03 : 0 0 1 9 04 : 0 0 2 9 05 : 0 0 1 0 0 06 : 0 0 2 2 3 07 : 0 0 5 7 7 4 8 9 08 : 0 0 6 2 6 09 : 0 0 5 9 8 10 : 0 0 7 0 1 11 : 0 0 8 2 9 12 : 0 0 9 2 8 13 : 0 0 9 1 0 14 : 0 0 8 6 4 15 : 0 0 8 7 6 16 : 0 0 8 6 6 17 : 0 0 9 7 3 18 : 0 0 7 6 9 19 : 0 0 6 1 7 20 : 0 0 4 4 5 21 : 0 0 2 7 5 22 : 0 0 1 7 7 23 : 0 0 8 7 To t a l 1 1 , 1 1 8 9 3 0 AM P e a k V o l AM P e a k F c t AM P e a k H r : PM P e a k V o l 1 , 0 1 5 PM P e a k F c t .8 0 6 PM P e a k H r 16 : 4 0 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 Da i l y F c t . 9 3 8 . 9 3 6 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 03 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 1 Cr e a t e d 2: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 1 5 , 0 1 9 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 th r o u g h 04 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 1 - 0 - 5 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n U C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 4 99 99 S 1 2 T H W S T 0 . 1 M I . S . O F W M A I N S T ( S H - 3 3 ) Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , A p r 1 9 , 2 0 2 0 Mo n , A p r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 Tu e , A p r 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 We d , A p r 2 2 , 2 0 2 0 Th u , A p r 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 Fri, Apr 24, 2020 Sat, Apr 25, 2020 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 1 7 1 6 01 : 0 0 7 1 02 : 0 0 2 2 03 : 0 0 3 2 04 : 0 0 1 2 8 05 : 0 0 2 2 2 1 06 : 0 0 6 0 5 5 07 : 0 0 2 1 0 1 9 5 08 : 0 0 2 8 5 2 6 9 09 : 0 0 2 6 6 2 1 9 10 : 0 0 2 9 3 2 7 0 11 : 0 0 2 7 0 3 1 3 12 : 0 0 3 3 5 4 0 1 13 : 0 0 3 7 5 3 8 8 14 : 0 0 3 0 2 3 4 2 15 : 0 0 3 2 2 3 2 7 16 : 0 0 2 9 2 3 5 2 17 : 0 0 3 6 4 3 7 6 18 : 0 0 3 1 9 2 5 4 19 : 0 0 1 8 8 2 3 3 20 : 0 0 1 5 7 1 3 6 21 : 0 0 1 0 2 8 9 22 : 0 0 3 0 5 2 23 : 0 0 3 1 2 4 To t a l 3 , 9 3 1 4 , 3 7 8 3 0 0 AM P e a k V o l 3 2 5 AM P e a k F c t .5 1 1 AM P e a k H r : 10 : 5 5 PM P e a k V o l 3 8 8 4 2 2 PM P e a k F c t .6 7 4 .6 5 1 PM P e a k H r 17 : 1 0 12 : 0 5 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 Da i l y F c t . 9 4 0 . 9 3 8 . 9 3 6 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 03 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 1 Cr e a t e d 2: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 5 , 6 2 0 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 th r o u g h 04 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 1 - 0 - 7 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M i n o r A r t e r i a l - O t h e r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 4 3 3 SH - 3 3 0 . 1 M I . W . O F 1 2 T H W S T Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , A p r 1 9 , 2 0 2 0 Mo n , A p r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 Tu e , A p r 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 We d , A p r 2 2 , 2 0 2 0 Th u , A p r 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 Fri, Apr 24, 2020 Sat, Apr 25, 2020 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 2 4 6 01 : 0 0 1 1 4 02 : 0 0 5 3 03 : 0 0 9 1 0 04 : 0 0 2 6 1 2 05 : 0 0 5 7 5 1 06 : 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 4 07 : 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 6 08 : 0 0 2 8 9 2 5 9 09 : 0 0 2 5 8 2 4 6 10 : 0 0 3 3 7 2 8 9 11 : 0 0 3 1 9 3 1 9 12 : 0 0 3 5 1 3 4 8 13 : 0 0 3 8 5 4 0 1 14 : 0 0 3 4 2 3 4 1 15 : 0 0 3 8 3 3 4 8 16 : 0 0 3 8 4 3 4 0 17 : 0 0 4 4 2 4 2 7 18 : 0 0 3 4 3 2 9 2 19 : 0 0 2 7 0 2 4 8 20 : 0 0 2 3 5 1 8 6 21 : 0 0 1 3 7 1 2 6 22 : 0 0 6 6 6 7 23 : 0 0 2 3 2 8 To t a l 4 , 5 6 4 4 , 7 5 0 3 9 6 AM P e a k V o l 3 3 2 AM P e a k F c t .7 2 8 AM P e a k H r : 10 : 2 0 PM P e a k V o l 4 5 2 4 3 6 PM P e a k F c t .8 1 9 .7 1 2 PM P e a k H r 17 : 0 5 16 : 4 0 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 Da i l y F c t . 9 3 1 . 9 4 7 . 9 3 7 Ax l e F c t . 4 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 4 5 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 03 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 1 Cr e a t e d 2: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 5 , 7 0 5 N D I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 9 to 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 8 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n U M i n o r A r t e r i a l Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 N 2 0 0 0 W R D 0 . 1 M I . N . O F W 1 0 0 0 N R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 5 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , M a y 6 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 9 We d , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, May 10, 2019 Sat, May 11, 2019 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 1 2 1 9 01 : 0 0 8 5 02 : 0 0 2 4 03 : 0 0 6 5 04 : 0 0 3 1 2 05 : 0 0 3 6 3 3 06 : 0 0 1 0 7 1 0 1 07 : 0 0 2 5 4 2 3 9 08 : 0 0 2 8 9 2 7 2 2 8 7 09 : 0 0 1 9 6 1 9 2 10 : 0 0 1 7 0 2 0 9 11 : 0 0 2 3 2 2 3 5 12 : 0 0 2 3 0 2 5 5 13 : 0 0 1 8 9 2 3 9 14 : 0 0 2 4 1 2 8 0 15 : 0 0 2 5 0 2 6 9 16 : 0 0 2 4 9 3 0 7 17 : 0 0 2 6 0 3 3 8 18 : 0 0 2 5 5 2 8 4 19 : 0 0 1 8 0 1 9 8 20 : 0 0 1 6 8 2 0 7 21 : 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 22 : 0 0 8 5 8 3 23 : 0 0 2 5 3 2 To t a l 3 , 1 1 9 3 , 9 7 8 7 0 5 AM P e a k V o l 3 3 1 3 2 0 AM P e a k F c t .8 1 1 .8 2 5 AM P e a k H r 7: 4 5 7: 4 5 PM P e a k V o l 2 8 7 3 3 9 PM P e a k F c t .8 6 4 .8 9 2 PM P e a k H r 17 : 1 5 17 : 1 5 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 10 : 0 6 A M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 3 , 7 9 7 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 9 to 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 8 - 0 - 5 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n U M i n o r A r t e r i a l Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 N 2 0 0 0 W R D 0 . 1 M I . S . O F W 1 0 0 0 N R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 5 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , M a y 6 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 9 We d , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, May 10, 2019 Sat, May 11, 2019 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 1 4 1 0 4 2 4 1 5 9 01 : 0 0 1 0 6 4 5 3 2 02 : 0 0 4 3 1 8 4 4 03 : 0 0 6 1 5 6 2 4 04 : 0 0 7 0 7 1 3 2 1 1 05 : 0 0 5 0 4 4 6 4 9 5 4 4 06 : 0 0 1 5 0 3 7 1 1 3 1 4 5 3 6 1 0 9 07 : 0 0 3 3 8 9 1 2 4 7 3 2 3 7 9 2 4 4 08 : 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 2 9 2 4 2 4 1 3 1 2 9 3 3 7 7 1 0 0 2 7 7 09 : 0 0 2 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 0 2 5 3 1 0 5 1 4 8 10 : 0 0 2 4 6 1 0 7 1 3 9 3 0 5 1 4 0 1 6 5 11 : 0 0 2 8 7 1 2 9 1 5 8 3 0 8 1 7 1 1 3 7 12 : 0 0 3 1 9 1 6 8 1 5 1 3 5 8 1 8 1 1 7 7 13 : 0 0 2 8 3 1 3 7 1 4 6 3 0 5 1 4 7 1 5 8 14 : 0 0 3 3 2 1 8 0 1 5 2 4 0 7 2 2 5 1 8 2 15 : 0 0 3 4 2 1 9 7 1 4 5 3 6 8 2 0 7 1 6 1 16 : 0 0 3 6 2 2 0 6 1 5 6 4 2 8 2 4 3 1 8 5 17 : 0 0 3 7 7 2 5 2 1 2 5 4 8 3 2 8 5 1 9 8 18 : 0 0 3 9 9 2 5 1 1 4 8 3 9 9 2 3 1 1 6 8 19 : 0 0 2 7 1 1 6 4 1 0 7 2 9 8 1 7 5 1 2 3 20 : 0 0 2 5 4 1 4 3 1 1 1 2 9 4 1 4 4 1 5 0 21 : 0 0 1 4 4 8 9 5 5 2 1 4 1 3 3 8 1 22 : 0 0 1 1 8 7 8 4 0 9 3 5 7 3 6 23 : 0 0 3 1 1 9 1 2 4 5 3 5 1 0 To t a l 4 , 4 3 6 2 , 3 4 9 2 , 0 8 7 5 , 5 6 1 2 , 7 6 2 2 , 7 9 9 9 5 0 2 4 6 7 0 4 AM P e a k V o l 4 4 7 1 3 3 3 5 2 4 8 2 1 7 1 3 3 8 AM P e a k F c t .8 2 2 .7 0 7 .7 2 7 .8 4 3 .8 2 2 .7 1 AM P e a k H r 7: 3 0 8: 1 5 7: 3 0 7: 4 5 11 : 0 0 7: 3 0 PM P e a k V o l 4 0 8 2 8 0 1 6 9 4 8 3 2 8 5 1 9 9 PM P e a k F c t .8 7 2 .8 6 4 .7 6 8 .9 0 8 .8 6 9 .8 5 8 PM P e a k H r 16 : 4 5 17 : 1 5 14 : 3 0 17 : 0 0 16 : 4 5 17 : 1 5 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 10 : 0 6 A M PD I R A A D T 2 , 6 7 8 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 2 , 6 4 6 5 , 3 2 4 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 9 to 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 9 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 8 - 0 - 7 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R L o c a l S y s t e m Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 W 1 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . W . O F N 2 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 5 , 2 0 1 9 Mo n , M a y 6 , 2 0 1 9 Tu e , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 9 We d , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 9 Th u , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 9 Fri, May 10, 2019 Sat, May 11, 2019 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 6 7 01 : 0 0 4 2 02 : 0 0 2 4 03 : 0 0 0 1 04 : 0 0 4 4 05 : 0 0 1 5 1 7 06 : 0 0 4 5 4 3 07 : 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 6 08 : 0 0 1 1 9 1 3 5 1 2 8 09 : 0 0 6 5 7 9 10 : 0 0 6 6 9 6 11 : 0 0 5 9 8 3 12 : 0 0 9 4 1 0 7 13 : 0 0 9 6 8 0 14 : 0 0 9 7 1 1 0 15 : 0 0 9 8 1 0 8 16 : 0 0 1 2 1 1 3 8 17 : 0 0 1 5 1 1 4 3 18 : 0 0 1 4 1 1 1 7 19 : 0 0 9 5 1 1 0 20 : 0 0 9 5 1 0 2 21 : 0 0 5 2 6 7 22 : 0 0 3 1 1 5 23 : 0 0 1 4 1 3 To t a l 1 , 3 9 4 1 , 6 8 1 3 1 2 AM P e a k V o l 1 2 8 1 5 9 AM P e a k F c t .8 4 2 .8 6 4 AM P e a k H r 7: 4 5 7: 4 5 PM P e a k V o l 1 5 7 1 5 2 PM P e a k F c t .9 3 5 .9 0 5 PM P e a k H r 16 : 4 5 16 : 4 5 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 9 Cr e a t e d 10 : 0 6 A M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 1 , 6 4 6 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 06 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 th r o u g h 06 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 0 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 9 - 0 - 3 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R L o c a l S y s t e m Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 4 2 50 W 2 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . E . O F N 2 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , J u n 1 4 , 2 0 2 0 Mo n , J u n 1 5 , 2 0 2 0 Tu e , J u n 1 6 , 2 0 2 0 We d , J u n 1 7 , 2 0 2 0 Th u , J u n 1 8 , 2 0 2 0 Fri, Jun 19, 2020 Sat, Jun 20, 2020 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 1 0 01 : 0 0 2 0 02 : 0 0 0 0 03 : 0 0 0 0 04 : 0 0 0 3 05 : 0 0 2 5 06 : 0 0 1 3 8 07 : 0 0 1 3 1 2 08 : 0 0 1 4 9 09 : 0 0 1 3 1 5 10 : 0 0 2 8 1 5 11 : 0 0 1 1 1 2 12 : 0 0 2 5 2 1 13 : 0 0 1 3 1 9 14 : 0 0 1 4 1 8 15 : 0 0 1 7 1 4 16 : 0 0 2 9 1 3 17 : 0 0 2 5 2 3 18 : 0 0 1 3 9 19 : 0 0 2 3 1 6 20 : 0 0 1 1 6 21 : 0 0 3 1 1 22 : 0 0 2 2 23 : 0 0 3 0 To t a l 2 5 7 2 3 3 1 6 AM P e a k V o l 1 9 AM P e a k F c t .1 9 8 AM P e a k H r : 9: 2 0 PM P e a k V o l 3 0 2 4 PM P e a k F c t .4 1 7 .4 PM P e a k H r 15 : 5 5 16 : 5 0 Se a s o n a l F c t . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 Da i l y F c t . 9 6 1 . 9 4 9 . 9 1 6 Ax l e F c t . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 03 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 1 Cr e a t e d 2: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 0 1 9 2 N D I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 06 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 th r o u g h 06 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 0 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 4 9 - 0 - 7 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 4 2 50 W 2 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . W . O F N 2 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , J u n 1 4 , 2 0 2 0 Mo n , J u n 1 5 , 2 0 2 0 Tu e , J u n 1 6 , 2 0 2 0 We d , J u n 1 7 , 2 0 2 0 Th u , J u n 1 8 , 2 0 2 0 Fri, Jun 19, 2020 Sat, Jun 20, 2020 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 1 0 8 2 1 5 8 7 01 : 0 0 4 0 4 7 3 4 02 : 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 2 03 : 0 0 3 2 1 2 1 1 04 : 0 0 6 5 1 1 0 9 1 05 : 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 5 1 2 3 06 : 0 0 4 3 3 3 1 0 5 5 4 3 1 2 07 : 0 0 7 3 5 9 1 4 8 9 6 5 2 4 08 : 0 0 8 0 5 0 3 0 9 5 6 8 2 7 09 : 0 0 1 0 2 6 8 3 4 8 7 5 4 3 3 10 : 0 0 8 4 4 8 3 6 9 4 5 7 3 7 11 : 0 0 8 4 4 4 4 0 9 5 5 3 4 2 12 : 0 0 9 6 5 0 4 6 1 1 7 6 4 5 3 13 : 0 0 9 3 5 6 3 7 9 1 4 8 4 3 14 : 0 0 9 6 5 4 4 2 8 3 4 0 4 3 15 : 0 0 1 2 0 6 4 5 6 8 0 4 1 3 9 16 : 0 0 1 3 2 6 0 7 2 8 3 4 3 4 0 17 : 0 0 1 3 3 5 1 8 2 1 3 3 5 3 8 0 18 : 0 0 1 0 6 4 2 6 4 1 0 0 3 4 6 6 19 : 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 6 0 9 1 3 8 5 3 20 : 0 0 6 1 2 7 3 4 7 2 3 7 3 5 21 : 0 0 5 9 2 8 3 1 5 9 2 6 3 3 22 : 0 0 3 1 9 2 2 4 2 2 1 2 1 23 : 0 0 1 9 7 1 2 2 3 9 1 4 To t a l 1 , 4 7 9 7 6 7 7 1 2 1 , 5 1 4 8 1 2 7 0 2 1 0 6 7 6 3 0 AM P e a k V o l 1 0 6 7 4 4 4 AM P e a k F c t .6 7 9 .6 8 5 .5 2 4 AM P e a k H r : : : 9: 4 5 7: 4 0 9: 3 0 PM P e a k V o l 1 4 2 6 6 8 7 1 4 0 6 6 8 6 PM P e a k F c t .6 5 7 .5 5 .6 5 9 .6 4 8 .6 1 1 .5 9 7 PM P e a k H r 16 : 2 5 16 : 2 5 17 : 3 0 17 : 1 5 12 : 1 5 17 : 0 5 Se a s o n a l F c t . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 8 4 6 Da i l y F c t . 9 6 1 . 9 6 1 . 9 6 1 . 9 4 9 . 9 4 9 . 9 4 9 . 9 1 6 . 9 1 6 . 9 1 6 Ax l e F c t . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 03 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 1 Cr e a t e d 2: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 5 8 3 DV03S: Page 1 of 1 6 6 7 1 , 2 5 0 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 7 to 05 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 7 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 5 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 N 3 0 0 0 W R D 0 . 1 M I . N . O F W 2 0 0 0 N R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 7 Mo n , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 7 Tu e , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 7 We d , M a y 1 0 , 2 0 1 7 Th u , M a y 1 1 , 2 0 1 7 Fr i , M a y 1 2 , 2 0 1 7 Sat, May 13, 2017 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 4 4 01 : 0 0 3 6 02 : 0 0 2 2 03 : 0 0 3 1 04 : 0 0 5 5 05 : 0 0 1 2 7 06 : 0 0 2 7 2 4 07 : 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 0 08 : 0 0 9 4 9 2 09 : 0 0 5 4 6 2 10 : 0 0 6 8 6 5 11 : 0 0 1 0 4 8 5 12 : 0 0 7 8 4 4 13 : 0 0 7 3 6 1 14 : 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 2 15 : 0 0 7 7 8 9 16 : 0 0 7 3 9 8 17 : 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 7 18 : 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 19 : 0 0 6 7 8 9 20 : 0 0 5 3 7 0 21 : 0 0 5 6 5 6 22 : 0 0 2 7 3 3 23 : 0 0 8 1 4 To t a l 1 , 1 5 6 1 , 3 3 9 1 5 9 AM P e a k V o l 1 3 1 AM P e a k F c t .6 5 5 AM P e a k H r : 0: 2 9 PM P e a k V o l 1 1 4 1 2 0 PM P e a k F c t .8 6 4 .7 8 9 PM P e a k H r 1: 1 0 1: 0 9 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 7 Cr e a t e d 2: 1 9 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV 0 3 S : P a g e 1 o f 1 0 1 , 2 3 1 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 7 to 05 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 7 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 5 0 - 0 - 3 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 W 2 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . E . O F N 3 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 7 Mo n , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 7 Tu e , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 7 We d , M a y 1 0 , 2 0 1 7 Th u , M a y 1 1 , 2 0 1 7 Fr i , M a y 1 2 , 2 0 1 7 Sat, May 13, 2017 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 8 5 01 : 0 0 5 7 02 : 0 0 4 3 03 : 0 0 2 7 04 : 0 0 3 6 05 : 0 0 1 7 1 1 06 : 0 0 4 5 4 4 07 : 0 0 1 3 9 1 3 6 08 : 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 1 09 : 0 0 8 1 8 0 10 : 0 0 8 3 1 0 6 11 : 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 6 12 : 0 0 9 3 9 3 13 : 0 0 1 1 7 1 2 0 14 : 0 0 1 1 7 1 2 9 15 : 0 0 1 3 4 1 3 3 16 : 0 0 1 3 3 1 3 6 17 : 0 0 1 6 3 1 7 6 18 : 0 0 1 6 4 1 4 0 19 : 0 0 9 7 1 1 8 20 : 0 0 9 7 9 7 21 : 0 0 8 7 7 8 22 : 0 0 4 0 4 4 23 : 0 0 1 3 1 4 To t a l 1 , 6 4 8 1 , 9 0 4 2 1 9 AM P e a k V o l 1 4 7 AM P e a k F c t .6 3 4 AM P e a k H r : 0: 3 1 PM P e a k V o l 1 7 2 1 7 6 PM P e a k F c t .8 1 1 .8 6 3 PM P e a k H r 1: 1 0 1: 0 8 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 7 Cr e a t e d 2: 1 9 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV 0 3 S : P a g e 1 o f 1 0 1 , 7 5 0 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 7 to 05 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 7 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 5 0 - 0 - 5 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R M a j o r C o l l e c t o r Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 N 3 0 0 0 W R D 0 . 1 M I . S . O F W 2 0 0 0 N R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 7 Mo n , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 7 Tu e , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 7 We d , M a y 1 0 , 2 0 1 7 Th u , M a y 1 1 , 2 0 1 7 Fr i , M a y 1 2 , 2 0 1 7 Sat, May 13, 2017 Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Ro a d N S Road N S 00 : 0 0 1 3 01 : 0 0 0 1 02 : 0 0 1 1 03 : 0 0 3 4 04 : 0 0 2 4 05 : 0 0 2 0 06 : 0 0 1 0 1 2 07 : 0 0 2 8 3 2 08 : 0 0 2 6 3 8 09 : 0 0 2 6 2 2 10 : 0 0 2 3 1 8 11 : 0 0 3 6 3 2 12 : 0 0 2 9 1 8 13 : 0 0 1 4 2 0 14 : 0 0 2 9 4 2 15 : 0 0 3 2 3 6 16 : 0 0 2 8 3 0 17 : 0 0 4 5 3 6 18 : 0 0 4 1 2 9 19 : 0 0 3 5 3 4 20 : 0 0 3 9 2 5 21 : 0 0 2 7 1 5 22 : 0 0 4 7 23 : 0 0 3 5 To t a l 4 3 7 4 5 4 5 7 AM P e a k V o l 4 7 AM P e a k F c t .5 3 4 AM P e a k H r : 0: 2 9 PM P e a k V o l 5 9 4 3 PM P e a k F c t .6 4 1 .7 6 8 PM P e a k H r 1: 1 0 1: 0 1 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 7 Cr e a t e d 4: 5 3 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV 0 3 S : P a g e 1 o f 1 0 4 3 9 ND I R A A D T Id a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Sh o r t - t e r m H o u r l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e f o r 05 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 7 to 05 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 7 Si t e n a m e s : Co u n t y : Fu n c t C l a s s : Lo c a t i o n : 00 0 0 0 - 3 3 0 5 0 - 0 - 7 - 0 - 0 Ma d i s o n R L o c a l S y s t e m Ax l e F a c t o r G r p : Gr o w t h F a c t o r G r p : 51 51 50 W 2 0 0 0 N R D 0 . 1 M I . W . O F N 3 0 0 0 W R D Se a s o n a l F a c t o r G r p : Da i l y F a c t o r G r p : Su n , M a y 7 , 2 0 1 7 Mo n , M a y 8 , 2 0 1 7 Tu e , M a y 9 , 2 0 1 7 We d , M a y 1 0 , 2 0 1 7 Th u , M a y 1 1 , 2 0 1 7 Fr i , M a y 1 2 , 2 0 1 7 Sat, May 13, 2017 Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Ro a d E W Road E W 00 : 0 0 3 6 01 : 0 0 2 2 02 : 0 0 3 2 03 : 0 0 0 4 04 : 0 0 2 5 05 : 0 0 8 5 06 : 0 0 3 0 2 3 07 : 0 0 6 6 7 7 08 : 0 0 6 9 6 4 09 : 0 0 4 3 4 6 10 : 0 0 4 7 7 8 11 : 0 0 6 3 7 5 12 : 0 0 6 3 7 2 13 : 0 0 7 0 7 3 14 : 0 0 6 5 7 5 15 : 0 0 8 8 7 9 16 : 0 0 8 8 9 3 17 : 0 0 8 1 9 4 18 : 0 0 1 0 7 8 0 19 : 0 0 1 0 0 5 7 20 : 0 0 6 5 5 4 21 : 0 0 5 0 3 9 22 : 0 0 2 7 2 6 23 : 0 0 9 4 To t a l 1 , 0 3 5 1 , 1 2 3 1 2 4 AM P e a k V o l 9 2 AM P e a k F c t .8 8 5 AM P e a k H r : 0: 4 2 PM P e a k V o l 1 3 8 1 0 1 PM P e a k F c t .7 1 9 .7 4 3 PM P e a k H r 1: 1 3 1: 0 2 Se a s o n a l F c t 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 0 Da i l y F c t 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 Ax l e F c t . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 . 4 7 0 Pu l s e F c t 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 RO A D A A D T 05 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 7 Cr e a t e d 2: 1 9 P M PD I R A A D T 0 DV 0 3 S : P a g e 1 o f 1 0 1 , 0 6 0 ND I R A A D T Project Analysis Worksheet Tranportation Engineering Traffic Volume Count Intersection Tally Sheet - One Hour Client:Elevation Management LLC DESIGNED BEC Project:Copper Heights CHECKED BEC Project No.:01-21-0007 DATE: ######## Project Information TOTAL COUNTS 1 State: Idaho ID Passenger CommercialTotal 2 County:Madison N1 0 3 North-South Roadway 2000 West N2 0 4 East-West Roadway 2000 North N3 0 5 Type of Intersection:Four-Way S1 0 6 Date Data Collected:S2 0 7 Time Period Analyzed:7:30 A.M S3 0 8 until 8:30 A.M E1 0 9 E2 0 10 E3 0 11 W1 0 12 W2 0 13 W3 0 14 Total 0 Traffic Counts https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01-21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/Traffic Counts/[PAW _2000 W 2000 N.xlsx]Right-Turn Unsginalized 28-Apr-21 N1 N2 N3 W W W E1 E2 E3 S1 S2 S3 Project Analysis Worksheet Tranportation Engineering Traffic Volume Count Intersection Tally Sheet - One Hour Client:Elevation Management LLC DESIGNED BEC Project:Copper Heights CHECKED BEC Project No.:01-21-0007 DATE: ######## Project Information TOTAL COUNTS 1 State: Idaho ID Passenger CommercialTotal 2 County:Madison N1 1 1 3 North-South Roadway 3000 West N2 19 3 22 4 East-West Roadway 2000 North N3 3 1 4 5 Type of Intersection:Four-Way S1 3 2 5 6 Date Data Collected:S2 9 1 10 7 Time Period Analyzed:7:30 A.M S3 50 1 51 8 until 8:30 A.M E1 9 1 10 9 E2 43 3 46 10 E3 10 10 11 W1 30 1 31 12 W2 12 12 13 W3 2 2 14 Total 204 Traffic Counts https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01-21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/Traffic Counts/[PAW _3000 W 2000 N.xlsx]Right-Turn Unsginalized 28-Apr-21 N1 N2 N3 W W W E1 E2 E3 S1 S2 S3 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix F Future Traffic Volumes 127 0 0 4900 8600 93 0 0 66 0 0 64 0 0 128 0 0 3500 44 0 0 5000 3700 67 0 0 4500 76 0 0 105 0 0 11 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 13 9 0 0 880 0 910 0 19700 620 0 6100 11 6 0 0 800 0 54 0 0 24500 980 0 65 0 0 24900 810 0 27 2 0 0 10000 3100 3300 3000 400 0 3600 <3 0 0 0 125 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 128 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 3300 <3 0 0 0 <300 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 3700 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 40 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 < 3 0 0 0 112 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 127 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 3300 49 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 10000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 110 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 37 0 0 <3 0 0 0 36 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000<3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 Figure 12 2030 No-Build LOS 0.5 0 0.5 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ T M P U p d a t e d F i g u r e s 2 \ 0 9 2 0 3 0 N o - B u i l d L O S . m x d , 3 / 5 / 2 0 1 5 2 : 0 2 : 1 9 P M , t r a v i s b Madison County Master Transportation Plan Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 2030 No-Build Level of ServiceExisting Level of Service LegendLevel of Service Acceptable (LOS A-B) Acceptable (LOS C) Unacceptable (LOS D) Unacceptable (LOS E) Unacceptable (LOS F) Rexburg City Limits 4000 Daily Volume Local/County Road 8600 9300 67 0 0 76 0 0 49 0 0 105 0 0 11 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 11 5 0 0 13 9 0 0 <3000 880 0 9100 6100 11 6 0 0 54 0 0 37 0 0 24500 14000 980 0 65 0 0 24900 27 2 0 0 21800 10000 28 9 0 0 4700 19700 3100 3300 3000 400 0 3 6 0 0 10 3 0 0 10000 3300 36 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 110 0 0 <3000 3600 <3000 <3 0 0 0 3600 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 10 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 440 0 70 0 0 46 0 0 77 0 0 < 3000 89 0 0 67 0 0 680 0 9900 19400 880 0 75 0 0 16800 7800 17 3 0 0 4100 15500 23 3 0 0 3500 10600 86 0 0 13 1 0 0 < 3000 16800 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 46 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000< 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 6000 77 0 0 1100 0 11 9 0 0 3900 76 0 0 149 0 0 540 0 4100 130 0 0 148 0 0 4300 4500 4400 51 0 0 91 0 0 13 5 0 0 13100 12 5 0 0 16 8 0 0 56 0 0 103 0 0 10 5 0 0 730 0 12 8 0 0 900 0 670 0 147 0 0 3600 4000 142 0 0 68 0 0 111 0 0 720 0 5500 29800 970 0 33 1 0 0 24600 11200 6200 61 0 0 4700 4800 <3 0 0 0 145 0 0 <3000 <3000<3000<3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 149 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <300 0 <3 0 0 0 51 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 5100 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 10500 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 < 3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000<3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 Figure 14 2040 No-Build LOS 0.5 0 0.5 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ T M P U p d a t e d F i g u r e s 2 \ 1 0 2 0 4 0 N o - B u i l d L O S . m x d , 3 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 5 2 : 1 9 : 2 8 P M , t r a v i s b Madison County Master Transportation Plan Existing Level of Service 67 0 0 440 0 < 3000 4100 70 0 0 46 0 0 77 0 0 10600 89 0 0 680 0 9900 570 0 19400 880 0 75 0 0 16800 7800 510 0 17 3 0 0 15500 23 3 0 0 3500 86 0 0 13 1 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 46 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 16800 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000< 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 < 3000 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3 0 0 0 < 3000 < 3000 2040 No-Build Level of Service LegendLevel of Service Acceptable (LOS A-B) Acceptable (LOS C) Unacceptable (LOS D) Unacceptable (LOS E) Unacceptable (LOS F) Rexburg City Limits 4000 Daily Volume Local/County Road 1100 0 1190 0 540 0 4500 51 0 0 91 0 0 13 5 0 0 13100 12 5 0 0 16 8 0 0 14 1 0 0 <3000 103 0 0 10500 7500 73 0 0 12 8 0 0 3800 14 9 0 0 3600 88 0 0 4000 142 0 0 68 0 0 26200 16300 111 0 0 5500 29800 33 1 0 0 24600 11200 32 7 0 0 3200 61 0 0 4700 4 8 0 0 5800 77 0 0 <3000 112 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 10 5 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 24600 10 5 0 0 <3 0 0 0 4800 <3000 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3000 24600 5400 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 51 0 0 <3 0 0 0 135 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3000 <3 0 0 0 <3 0 0 0 <3000 Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix G Future Transportation System Figure 13 Solutions to 2030 Problems 1 0 1 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ F i n a l F i g u r e M a p s \ 1 3 2 0 3 0 N e e d s . m x d , 6 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 5 9 : 0 0 : 0 6 A M , S t e v e n L Madison County Transportation Master Plan Legend Functional Class Highway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local/County Road Rexburg City Limits DATE 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom Widen5 Lanes TrafficCalming Widen5 Lanes TrafficCalming Widen5 Lanes Widen5 Lanes New 3 LaneRoad New 3 LaneRoad Figure 15 2040 Problem Solutions 1 0 1 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ F i n a l F i g u r e M a p s \ 1 5 S o l u t i o n s t o 2 0 4 0 P r o b l e m s . m x d , 6 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 5 9 : 1 4 : 2 0 A M , S t e v e n L Madison County Transportation Master Plan Legend Functional Class Highway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local/County Road Rexburg City Limits DATE 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom Widen5 Lanes InterchangeReconfigurationWiden5 Lanes Widen7 LanesWiden7 Lanes InterchangeReconfiguration Widen5 LanesWiden5 Lanes Widen7 LanesWiden7 Lanes InterchangeReconfiguration InterchangeReconfiguration 2nd EastCapacity ImprovementArea 2nd EastCapacity Improvement Area 3/17/2015Figure 18 Rural Madison County Projects 1 0 1 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ T M P U p d a t e d F i g u r e s 2 \ P l a n n e d a n d P o t e n t i a l P r o j e c t s f o r M a d i s o n C o u n t y . m x d , 3 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 5 3 : 1 5 : 1 5 P M , t r a v i s b TRBMadison County Master Transportation Plan DATE DRAWN 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 3 12 6 7 5 16 17 1 10 2 11 18 15 4 14 20 13 19 9 1. 3000W/2000N (Hibbard Church) Guardrail Project (Completed 2015) 2. 2000W/2000N (Homer Taylor Corner) Guardrail Project (Completed 2015) 3.7800S/600E (Suttons/Archer) (Completed 2015) 4. 1000E Bridge (approved for construction) 5. 5000S Roadway (in development, anticipated funding 2018) 6. Twin Bridge Repair 7. 3100W (Muskrat Rd.) Extension 8. 5200S/4300W Int. Improvements/Shoulder Improvements 9.Cherry Stem Road (To be completed with 5000 S Project 10.3000W/2000N Intersection (Roundabout or "T") 11.2000W/2000N Intersection (Roundabout or "T") 12. 7800S/600E Int. (Suttons/Archer Rd.) Roundabout or "T" 13. 2000N/5000E Int. (Moody/Baker) Roundabout or "T" 14. 2000N/Yellowstone Hwy Int. Offset/Skew Realignment (city) 15. Salem Road Widening 16. Frontage Road West of US-20 17. 2000S Crossing US-20 (Poleline, Burton Rd.) 18. 2000N Crossing US-20 (Moody Rd.) 19. 5th W Extension 20. 2000N Bridge (Moody Rd., Teton River) 21. Potential Access Enhancements in Conjunction With Thornton Interchange including access enhancements 22. Warm Slough Bridge 23. Canal Culvert Repair Project List Thornton Interchange to be constructedas funding becomes available. 8 Lyman Archer Plano Edmonds Burton Hibbard Rexburg SugarCity22 21 Guardrail Intersection Roadway Bridge US-20 Crossing Legend Culvert 23 1. Maintenance projects which may be required are not shown. 2. Projects shown are at varying stages of development. Some are either approved for construction or are currently in development stages as noted. Other projects are shown as potentially needed projects as needs arise. Priority will be based on funding, safety, development, or other factors. Projects are shown for potential listing on the master plan. 3. Alignments shown are schematic only and are not intended to indicate planned design. Notes: S 2 0 0 0 W N 3 0 0 0 W US H i g h w a y 2 0 N 3 0 0 0 E W 3000 N N 2 n d E S 4 0 0 0 W N 7 t h E E 5000 N S 4 0 0 W W Hwy 33 S 1 1 0 0 E W 2000 S N 2 0 0 0 W E Hwy 33 S 3 0 0 0 W S 5 5 0 0 W S 4 3 0 0 W E Poleline Rd S 2 n d E S 1 2 t h W E 2000 S E 3000 N E 2000 N S 3 3 0 0 W N 1 2 t h W W 1000 S S 5 0 0 0 W W 1000 N W 5000 S E Moody Rd N S a l e m H w y W 1 4 t h N W 7th S W Main St University Blvd E 7th N N 9 t h E E 9th N S 1 4 0 0 W S 2 n d W N 1 6 t h E E 1000 N W Poleline Rd N 1 0 0 0 E E 2nd S S R a i l r o a d A v e Frontage St N 4 0 0 0 W 50 0 0 S o u t h E 3500 N Pi o n e e r R d S 4 t h E E Main St N H i l l R d W 2600 S E a s t P a r k w a y E Moran View Rd W 3200 S N 2 0 0 0 E W 5000 S US H i g h w a y 2 0 E 9th N 6/29/2015Figure 17 Vision Network 0.5 0 0.5 Miles $ O: \ ! 2 0 1 4 \ I F - 7 5 5 - 1 4 0 4 C i t y o f R e x b u r g a n d M a d i s o n C o u n t y T M P \ P r o j e c t D a t a \ G I S \ H o r r o c k s \ M x d \ T M P U p d a t e d F i g u r e s 2 \ 0 5 V i s i o n N e t w o r k . m x d , 6 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 5 7 : 2 3 : 5 9 A M , t r a v i s b TRBMadison County Master Transportation Plan Legend Functional Class Highway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local/County Road Rexburg City Limits Madison County Border DATE DRAWN 2162 West Grove Parkway Suite 400 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (801) 763-5100 N 2 n d E S 2 n d E W 3000 N S 1 2 t h W E Poleline Rd N 7 t h E US H i g h w a y 2 0 E Moody Rd W 1 4 t h N W 7th S W Main St E 7th N N 9 t h E University Blvd S 2 n d W N 1 6 t h E W Poleline Rd E 2nd S S R a i l r o a d A v e Pi o n e e r R d S 4 t h E S Y e l l o w s t o n e H w y E Main St W Center St N Hill Rd E 9th N W Moody Rd S 4 0 0 W S 1 1 0 0 E S 5 t h W N 3 r d E S 1 4 0 0 W Co u n t r y R d E Moran View RdN 5 t h W N Y e l l o w s t o n e H w y Barney Dairy RdE 4th N N 2 n d W S 5 t h W US H i g h w a y 2 0 US Hig h w a y 2 0 5t h W e s t E x t e n s i o n Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Moody RoadOverpass East ParkwayCorridor Poleline RoadOverpass 7th SouthOverpass Poleline RoadOverpass 7th SouthOverpass East ParkwayCorridor Moody RoadOverpass 5th WestExtension 5th WestExtension Elevation Management LLC Traffic Impact Study Copper Heights Project No. 01-21-0007 Civilize, PLLC 1 | P a g e https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01 -21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/TIS_Copper-Heights v1-1.docx.docx Appendix H Turn Lane Warrant Analyses Project Analysis Worksheet Tranportation Engineering Left Hand Turn Analysis/Warrant at Unsignalized Intersections Based on ITD Traffic Manual / NCHRP Report 745 Client:Elevation Management LLC DESIGNED BEC Project:Copper Heights CHECKED BEC Project No.:01-21-0007 DATE: 4/28/2021 Description:Southbound on N 3000 West and Left Turn into Development Horizon Years: 2020, 2025 DESIGN CRITERIA (Input the following based on observation, historical data, and/or results of a site specific study) 1 Jurisdiction Madison County Horizon or Planning Year 2020 2025 2 Subdivision or Development Name Copper Heights Development Type Rural Rural 3 Name of Major Roadway N. 3000 West No. of lanes on the major roadway Two Two 4 Name of Minor Roadway/Approach Unknown Number of Legs Three Three 5 Peak Hour AM Peak-hr, left-turn lane vol 0 20 (vehicles per hour) 6 Posted Speed Limit (MPH)35 Major Roadway Peak-hr vol 61 71 (veh/hour/lane). Analysis - Table and graph reproduced from NCHRP Report 745 (Axes on the graph are reversed from source) Intersection Southbound on N 3000 West and Left Turn into Development Horizon Years 2020, 2025 1 Consult chart below and evaluate the type of intersection and the left-turn, peak-hour volume Left Turn Three Leg Intersection, Four Leg Intersection, Three Leg Intersection, Four Leg Intersection, Three Leg Intersection, Four Leg Intersection, Peak Hour Major Two-Lane Highway Major Two-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Volume Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane (Veh/hr)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane) 5 200 150 75 50 450 50 10 100 50 75 25 300 50 15 100 50 50 25 250 50 20 50 <50 50 25 200 50 25 50 <50 50 <25 200 50 30 50 <50 50 <25 150 50 35 50 <50 50 <25 150 50 40 50 <50 50 <25 150 50 45 50 <50 50 <25 150 <50 50 50 <50 50 <25 100 <50 2 Check the plotted point(s) on the chart below against the anticpated intersection of major-road volume and peak-hour left-turn volume in the volume advancing. LEFT-TURN WARRANTED NO https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01-21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/App E - Turn Warrants/N 3000 West/[PAW _T_LTurn_Unsignalized_NCHRP-745.xlsx]Left-Hand Turn ITD Traffic Manual, Section 3B.04 White Lane Line Pavement Markings and Warrants Warrants for left-turn lanes on uncontrolled highways can be found in “NCHRP Report 745 – Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections.” NCHRP Report 745 - Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections Before installing a left-turn lane (or any other roadway improvement), it is necessary to consider the characteristics of the location where it would be installed. These characteristics guide the practitioner’s decisions about whether to install the lane and what specific design criteria need to be emphasized to optimize the operation of the lane at that location. The basic geometry of the intersection needed for use with the warrants is the number of lanes on the major roadway and the number of approaches to the intersection. The number of approaches and the development type (rural or urban/ suburban) are included in the warrants because the crash prediction methodology used to develop the warrants varied by these features. Rural crash prediction equations vary by number of lanes on the major roadway, so the warrants for rural highways also vary by number of lanes. Technical warrants are an important element of the decision-making process; however, other factors should also be considered when deciding whether to install a left-turn lane, including: • Sight distance relative to the position of the driver and 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Ma j o r H i g h w a y , P e a k - H o u r V o l u m e , (V e h / h r / l a n e ) Left-Turns Peak-Hour Volume (Veh/hr) Left-Turn Warrant for Intersections on Two-Lane Rural Highways Three Leg Intersection, Major Two-Lane Highway Peak-Hour Volume that Warrants a Left-Turn Lane (Veh/hr/lane) Four Leg Intersection, Major Two-Lane Highway Peak-Hour Volume that Warrants a Left-Turn Lane (Veh/hr/lane) Intersection N. 3000 West and Unknown 2020 Intersection N. 3000 West and Unknown 2025 Project Analysis Worksheet Tranportation Engineering Right-Hand Turn Analysis/Warrant for Uncontrolled Roads Intersecting with Public Highways/Approaches Based on ITD Traffic Manual Client:Elevation Management LLC DESIGNED BEC Project:Copper Heights CHECKED BEC Project No.:01-21-0007 DATE: 4/28/2021 Description:Northbound on N 3000 West and Right Turn into Development Horizon Years: 2020, 2025 DESIGN CRITERIA (Input the following based on observation, historical data, and/or results of a site specific study) 1 Jurisdiction Madison County Horizon or Planning Year 2020 2025 2 Subdivision or Development Name Copper Heights Development Type Rural Rural 3 Name of Major Roadway N. 3000 West No. of lanes on the major roadway Two Two 4 Name of Minor Roadway/Approach Unknown Number of legs Three Three 5 Peak Hour PM Major roadway volume 79 92 (veh/hour/lane). 6 Posted Speed Limit (MPH)35 Right-Turn, Peak Hour Vol 0 20 (veh/hour). Analysis - Table and graph reproduced from NCHRP Report 745 (Axes on the graph are reversed from source) Intersection Northbound on N 3000 West and Right Turn into Development Horizon Years 2020, 2025 1 Consult chart below and evaluate the type of intersection and the left-turn, peak-hour volume Posted Speed < 45 MPH Posted Speed < 45 MPH Posted Speed >/= 45 MPH Highway Volume Right Turn Right Turn Outside Lane Only Peak Hour Peak Hour Including R-T Volume Volume Volume (Veh/hr/lane)(veh/hr)(veh/hr) 0 100 100 100 100 100 200 87 87 300 73 35 400 60 25 500 47 20 600 33 <20 700 20 <20 800 <20 <20 900 <20 <20 1000 <20 <20 2 Check the plotted point(s) on the chart below against the anticpated intersection of major-road volume and peak-hour left-turn volume in the volume advancing. RIGHT-TURN WARRANTED NO https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01-21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/App E - Turn Warrants/N 3000 West/[PAW _T_RTurn_Uncontrolled_ITD_App.xlsx]Right-Turn Unsginalized ITD Traffic Manual, Section 3B.04 White Lane Line Pavement Markings and Warrants A right-turn lane warrant is shown in Figure 3B-1 that can be used for uncontrolled highways intersecting with public roads or approaches. Right-turn lanes can be further analyzed using the economic analysis procedure for right-turn deceleration lanes described in the article “Operational and Safety Effects of Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes on Urban and Suburban Arterials” that was published in the “Transportation Research Record, Volume 2023.” The methodology can be used 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Ri g h t T u r n V o l u m e ( V e h / h r ) Major Highway Volume (Veh/hr/lane) (Outside Lane Including Right-Turn Volume) Right-Turn Warrant for Intersections - ITD Traffic Manual Posted Speed < 45 MPH Right Turn Peak Hour Volume (veh/hr) Posted Speed >/= 45 MPH Right Turn Peak Hour Volume (veh/hr) Intersection N. 3000 West and Unknown 2020 Intersection N. 3000 West and Unknown 2025 Intersection N. 3000 West and Unknown 0 Project Analysis Worksheet Tranportation Engineering Left Hand Turn Analysis/Warrant at Unsignalized Intersections Based on ITD Traffic Manual / NCHRP Report 745 Client:Elevation Management LLC DESIGNED BEC Project:Copper Heights CHECKED BEC Project No.:01-21-0007 DATE: 4/28/2021 Description:Eastbound on W 2000 North and Right Turn into Development Horizon Years: 2020, 2025 DESIGN CRITERIA (Input the following based on observation, historical data, and/or results of a site specific study) 1 Jurisdiction Madison County Horizon or Planning Year 2020 2025 2 Subdivision or Development Name Copper Heights Development Type Rural Rural 3 Name of Major Roadway W. 2000 North No. of lanes on the major roadway Two Two 4 Name of Minor Roadway/Approach Unknown Number of Legs Three Three 5 Peak Hour PM Peak-hr, left-turn lane vol 0 20 (vehicles per hour) 6 Posted Speed Limit (MPH)50 Major Roadway Peak-hr vol 117 178 (veh/hour/lane). Analysis - Table and graph reproduced from NCHRP Report 745 (Axes on the graph are reversed from source) Intersection Eastbound on W 2000 North and Right Turn into Development Horizon Years 2020, 2025 1 Consult chart below and evaluate the type of intersection and the left-turn, peak-hour volume Left Turn Three Leg Intersection, Four Leg Intersection, Three Leg Intersection, Four Leg Intersection, Three Leg Intersection, Four Leg Intersection, Peak Hour Major Two-Lane Highway Major Two-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Major Four-Lane Highway Volume Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Peak-Hour Volume that Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane Warrants a Left-Turn Lane (Veh/hr)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane)(Veh/hr/lane) 5 200 150 75 50 450 50 10 100 50 75 25 300 50 15 100 50 50 25 250 50 20 50 <50 50 25 200 50 25 50 <50 50 <25 200 50 30 50 <50 50 <25 150 50 35 50 <50 50 <25 150 50 40 50 <50 50 <25 150 50 45 50 <50 50 <25 150 <50 50 50 <50 50 <25 100 <50 2 Check the plotted point(s) on the chart below against the anticpated intersection of major-road volume and peak-hour left-turn volume in the volume advancing. LEFT-TURN WARRANTED YES https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01-21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/App E - Turn Warrants/W 2000 North/[PAW _T_LTurn_Unsignalized_NCHRP-745.xlsx]Left-Hand Turn ITD Traffic Manual, Section 3B.04 White Lane Line Pavement Markings and Warrants Warrants for left-turn lanes on uncontrolled highways can be found in “NCHRP Report 745 – Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections.” NCHRP Report 745 - Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections Before installing a left-turn lane (or any other roadway improvement), it is necessary to consider the characteristics of the location where it would be installed. These characteristics guide the practitioner’s decisions about whether to install the lane and what specific design criteria need to be emphasized to optimize the operation of the lane at that location. The basic geometry of the intersection needed for use with the warrants is the number of lanes on the major roadway and the number of approaches to the intersection. The number of approaches and the development type (rural or urban/ suburban) are included in the warrants because the crash prediction methodology used to develop the warrants varied by these features. Rural crash prediction equations vary by number of lanes on the major roadway, so the warrants for rural highways also vary by number of lanes. Technical warrants are an important element of the decision-making process; however, other factors should also be considered when deciding whether to install a left-turn lane, including: • Sight distance relative to the position of the driver and 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Ma j o r H i g h w a y , P e a k - H o u r V o l u m e , (V e h / h r / l a n e ) Left-Turns Peak-Hour Volume (Veh/hr) Left-Turn Warrant for Intersections on Two-Lane Rural Highways Three Leg Intersection, Major Two-Lane Highway Peak-Hour Volume that Warrants a Left-Turn Lane (Veh/hr/lane) Four Leg Intersection, Major Two-Lane Highway Peak-Hour Volume that Warrants a Left-Turn Lane (Veh/hr/lane) Intersection W. 2000 North and Unknown 2020 Intersection W. 2000 North and Unknown 2025 Project Analysis Worksheet Tranportation Engineering Right-Hand Turn Analysis/Warrant for Uncontrolled Roads Intersecting with Public Highways/Approaches Based on ITD Traffic Manual Client:Elevation Management LLC DESIGNED BEC Project:Copper Heights CHECKED BEC Project No.:01-21-0007 DATE: 4/28/2021 Description:Eastbound on W 2000 North and Right Turn into Development Horizon Years: 2020, 2025 DESIGN CRITERIA (Input the following based on observation, historical data, and/or results of a site specific study) 1 Jurisdiction Madison County Horizon or Planning Year 2020 2025 2 Subdivision or Development Name Copper Heights Development Type Rural Rural 3 Name of Major Roadway W. 2000 North No. of lanes on the major roadway Two Two 4 Name of Minor Roadway/Approach Unknown Number of legs Three Three 5 Peak Hour AM Major roadway volume 98 146 (veh/hour/lane). 6 Posted Speed Limit (MPH)50 Right-Turn, Peak Hour Vol 0 20 (veh/hour). Analysis - Table and graph reproduced from NCHRP Report 745 (Axes on the graph are reversed from source) Intersection Eastbound on W 2000 North and Right Turn into Development Horizon Years 2020, 2025 1 Consult chart below and evaluate the type of intersection and the left-turn, peak-hour volume Posted Speed < 45 MPH Posted Speed < 45 MPH Posted Speed >/= 45 MPH Highway Volume Right Turn Right Turn Outside Lane Only Peak Hour Peak Hour Including R-T Volume Volume Volume (Veh/hr/lane)(veh/hr)(veh/hr) 0 100 100 100 100 100 200 87 87 300 73 35 400 60 25 500 47 20 600 33 <20 700 20 <20 800 <20 <20 900 <20 <20 1000 <20 <20 2 Check the plotted point(s) on the chart below against the anticpated intersection of major-road volume and peak-hour left-turn volume in the volume advancing. RIGHT-TURN WARRANTED NO https://civilize-my.sharepoint.com/personal/bcrowther_civilize_design/Documents/Civilize/Proj/Francis McKay/01-21-0007 Copper Heights/400 Prelim/1000 Civil/TIS/App E - Turn Warrants/W 2000 North/[PAW _T_RTurn_Uncontrolled_ITD_App.xlsx]Right-Turn Unsginalized ITD Traffic Manual, Section 3B.04 White Lane Line Pavement Markings and Warrants A right-turn lane warrant is shown in Figure 3B-1 that can be used for uncontrolled highways intersecting with public roads or approaches. Right-turn lanes can be further analyzed using the economic analysis procedure for right-turn deceleration lanes described in the article “Operational and Safety Effects of Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes on Urban and Suburban Arterials” that was published in the “Transportation Research Record, Volume 2023.” The methodology can be used 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Ri g h t T u r n V o l u m e ( V e h / h r ) Major Highway Volume (Veh/hr/lane) (Outside Lane Including Right-Turn Volume) Right-Turn Warrant for Intersections - ITD Traffic Manual Posted Speed < 45 MPH Right Turn Peak Hour Volume (veh/hr) Posted Speed >/= 45 MPH Right Turn Peak Hour Volume (veh/hr) Intersection W. 2000 North and Unknown 2020 Intersection W. 2000 North and Unknown 2025 Intersection W. 2000 North and Unknown 0