HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMPATABILITY REPORT - 21-00121 - 39 N Hidden Valley Rd - Solar Panels
TECSI Solar Inc. | 4525 San Pablo Dam Rd | El Sobrante, CA 94803 | 510-662-6042
Info@TECSIsolar.com | www.TECSIsolar.com Page 1 | 4
Technology,
Engineering &
Consulting for the
Solar Industry
March 22nd, 2017
Rick Gentry, Executive Vice President
Quickscrew International Inc. (SolarRoofHook)
5830 Las Positas Road
Livermore, CA 94551
800-743-6916
SUBJECT: SolarRoofHook Products Compatibility with Commercially Available Solar Racking Systems
Dear Mr. Gentry,
It is common in the solar industry to use several different roof attachment methods, also known as
stanchions or mounts, to connect a racking system to the roof. Due to the various types of roof
structures and roof coverings, a single solution for attaching a racking system to all roofs is not feasible.
For this reason, many racking system manufacturers do not provide any or all the mounting solutions
required to install their products. Over the years, mount manufacturers have worked closely with
racking manufacturers to ensure properly engineered connections between products. This compatibility
evaluation is a continuation of that trend.
The connection of the racking system to the roof
structure consists of the following components,
starting from the top down:
1. Solar racking system,
2. Hardware to attach the racking system to
the stanchion,
3. Stanchion, mount or tile hook,
4. Hardware to attach the mount to the roof.
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the
connection between the racking systems (1) and
the SolarRoofHook mounting products (3). For all
instances, the hardware (2) that attaches the racking system (1) to the mount (3) is provided by the
racking manufacturer. Any modifications other than those set forth in this evaluation will void all
conclusions and compliance approvals of this report.
(1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
TECSI Solar Inc. | 4525 San Pablo Dam Rd | El Sobrante, CA 94803 | 510-662-6042
Info@TECSIsolar.com | www.TECSIsolar.com Page 2 | 4
Table 1 lists all the SolarRoofHook (SRH) products reviewed. A compatibility matrix for these products
and the evaluated rail systems is shown in Table 2. The SolarRoofHook products from Table 1 are
compatible with all the solar racking products in Table 2. However, Table 2 includes exceptions,
modifications, and limitations that must be adhered to in order to maintain compatibility. Compatibility
was evaluated for physical fit and load limits not for electrical or NEC compliance. All of the products in
table 1 utilize a slot to allow for vertical alignment of the racking system. The load limit of this
connection was determined by the slip friction capacity of the connection. This is a conservative
analysis, because if slip were to occur the motion would be ultimately resisted when the bolt makes
contact with the end of the slot. The failure mode would then transition to yielding of the base material.
Table 3 shows the critical slip forces associated with each racking manufacturer based upon the
published torque requirement and material contact surfaces between the fastening hardware (2) or the
mounts (3).
Table 1.
Table 2.
15894 15987 17508 17520 17540 17548
17667
15987B
17509
17510
17511
17521
17522
17523
17541
17608
17609
17549
17550
17551
17568 17574 17585 17592 17626 17632
17569
17572
17573
17575
17576
17577
17586
17587
17588
17590
17591
17627
17628
17629
17633
17636
17637
Racking
Manufacturer
Racking
Model Number
Solar Roof Hook
Product Compatibility
Exceptions &
Modifications limitations
Snap-N-Rack 100 Compatible Min 0.1" thick washer, tighten to
max published torque value
Use the lowest value from
SRH pull test data or Table 3.
IronRidge X10, X100, X1000 Compatible None Use the lowest value from
SRH pull test data or Table 3.
Unirac SolarMount, SunFrame Compatible None None
Everest CrossRail Compatible None Bolt must fit in slot
TECSI Solar Inc. | 4525 San Pablo Dam Rd | El Sobrante, CA 94803 | 510-662-6042
Info@TECSIsolar.com | www.TECSIsolar.com Page 3 | 4
Table 2’s “Exceptions and Modifications” for the Snap-N-Rack product calls out the requirement of a
0.1” min thick washer. The washer is required because the 5/16” bolt supplied by Snap-N-Rack is small
relative to the slots provided by the SolarRoofHook products. The inclusion of a heavy washer allows
the fastener and its split washer to seat properly in the slot and provide an adequate bearing surface to
transfer loads. The washer is required to have the following characteristics:
18-8 or 316 stainless steel
Max inner diameter of 0.3625”
Min outer diameter of 0.75”
Min thickness of 0.1”
The limitations section of Table 2 for Snap-N-Rack and IronRidge, reflects the fact that some slip values
from Table 3 are lower than the published maximum values from pull test data for the products in Table
1. For that reason, when determining system capacities the designer needs to use the lesser value from
either Table 3 or the published test data for the products in Table 1. Please note, these are ultimate
loads and the designer will need to apply all appropriate factors of safety.
The fastening hardware for the Everest racking system uses an M10 bolt. A fit test was conducted with
this size bolt and the 10 mm slot of various SolarRoofHook products and the bolt could pass through the
slot with no issue. In most circumstances, the Everest M10 bolt is compatible with the SolarRoofHook
products. However, due to tolerance stack up, it is possible, however unlikely, that an interference
occurs and the bolts do not fit in the slot of the stanchion or tile hook. In that case, those components
would fail the compatibility requirement.
Table 3.
The “Force applied by bolt” values from Table 3 were determined using the following equation:
F = 12 * T / (k * D)
T = Torque
k = Torque Coefficient, .20
D = Nominal Bolt Diameter
The slip force was calculated using the following equation:
Fslip = μ * F
μ = Friction Coefficient
F = Force Applied by Bolt
Racking
Manufacturer Bolt Size
Published
Torque [ft-lbs]
Force applied
by bolt [lbs]
Slip force
Steel/AL [lbs]
Slip force
Steel/Steel [lbs]
Snap-N-Rack 5/16"16 3072 1874 2396
IronRidge 3/8"21 3333 2033 2600
Unirac 3/8"30 4800 2928 3744
Everest M 10 26 3962 2417 3091
TECSI Solar Inc. | 4525 San Pablo Dam Rd | El Sobrante, CA 94803 | 510-662-6042
Info@TECSIsolar.com | www.TECSIsolar.com Page 4 | 4
The friction coefficient used for the “Slip force” calculations in Table 3 for “Steel/AL” and “Steel/Steel”
were 0.61 and 0.78 respectively. These values were provided by Marks’s Standard Handbook for
Mechanical Engineers 10th edition.
All testing for the SolarRoofHook products was conducted by Applied Material & Engineering Inc.
located at 980 41st St. Oakland, CA 94608. All test reports and load values are available on the
SolarRoofHook website.
The fastening hardware for all the racking systems in Table 2 is stainless steel. Mounts 15891, 15894,
15897, 17592 from Table 1 are made of aluminum and therefore their test data is to be compared to the
“Steel/AL” column of Table 3, when required by Table 2. All other mounts in Table 1 are stainless steel
and therefore their test data is to be compared to the “Steel/Steel” column of Table 3, when required by
Table 2.
Please note, the load values discussed in this report are ultimate loads and do not include a factor of
safety. All code required factors of safety are to be applied to the values in Table 2 as well as to the
SolarRoofHook test data.
This report does not include an evaluation of the racking, the stanchions, or the electrical bonding
between components. This report is in no way intended to be a complete engineering analysis of the
entire system nor its attachment to the building structure. It does not replace or supersede engineering
requirements set forth by the code and local jurisdictions. Finally, this report is only relevant the
products and revisions evaluated at the time of the publishing of this report and is not applicable to
future derivations of these products.
The compatibility approvals in this report do not provide evidence nor a guarantee that the products
themselves, the racking, nor the roofing to which they are attached will not be damaged by loads less
than the maximum identified in testing or in Table 3. The products in Table 1 do deflect and yield under
load and it is the responsibility of the design engineer of the system to determine the appropriate
factors of safety and the allowable deflection for the required design load.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions about the findings or the approach used for this
evaluation.
Sincerely,
Samuel Truthseeker P.E.
Founder and Principal Engineer