Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDENSITY SOIL REPORT - 11-8-2018Project:Date: Contractor:Job/Permit #: Inspector:Weather: Source: Proctor: 6.9% Gauge#/SN: DS: MS: Test Number Probe Depth Proctor Pass/Fail 1 8" 18190-1 FAIL 2 8" 18190-1 FAIL 3 8" 18190-1 Pass 4 8" 18190-1 FAIL 5 8" 18190-1 Pass 6 8"18190 1 Pass Report of In-Place Soil Density Tests by Nuclear Gauge Method Wakeside Lake 11/8/2018 Craig Hobbs 18190 Chad Bare Partly Cloudy Material Description: Poorly Graded Gravel w/sand Native 18190-1 136.7 17625 2057 574 Location Wet Density Pounds Moisture Percent Moisture Dry Density Required Compaction Percent Compaction 91 Southwest end, near final grade, Center 128.2 3.3 2.6 124.9 95 91 South end, near final grade, West side 127.7 3.9 3.2 123.8 95 97 North 100ft, near final grade, West side 129.2 1.3 1.0 127.9 95 94 Southwest end, near final grade, East side 134.9 2.2 1.7 132.7 95 97 133 4 34 26 130 0 95 95 North 100ft, near final grade, center 135.6 3.5 2.6 132.1 95 North 100ft near final grade East side68 18190-1 Pass 7 8"18190-1 Pass 8 8"18190-1 Pass 9 8"18190-1 Pass 133.4 3.4 2.6 130.0 95 95 97North end, 3ft above waterline. East side 138.3 6.9 5.3 131.4 95 96 North 100ft, near final grade, East side 138.8 6.4 4.8 132.4 95 95North end, 3ft above waterline. West side North end, 3ft above waterline. Center 137.0 6.5 5.0 130.5 95 Tests 1 and 2 at the south end, and Test 4 at the middle of the pad were below 95% compaction. Inspector recommended more compactive effort in those areas. Contractor noted that they were bringing a larger roller to the job site. Inspector will return and perform more tests as needed. Project:Date: Contractor:Job/Permit #: Inspector:Weather: Source: Proctor: 6.9% Gauge#/SN: DS: MS: Test Number Probe Depth Proctor Pass/Fail 1 10" 18190-1 Pass 2 10" 18190-1 Pass 3 10" 18190-1 Pass 4 10" 18190-1 Pass 5 10" 18190-1 PassNorth end, near final grade, East side North 100ft, near final grade, West side (Retest)134.0 2.8 2.1 131.2 95 96 97 137.2 4.0 3.0 133.2 95 97 North end, near final grade, West side 136.3 3.9 2.9 132.4 95 98 Southwest end, near final grade, Center (Retest)137.0 4.2 3.2 132.895 97 South end, near final grade, West side (Retest)137.7 4.3 3.2 133.4 95 17625 2049 575 Location Wet Density Pounds Moisture Percent Moisture Dry Density Required Compaction Percent Compaction Report of In-Place Soil Density Tests by Nuclear Gauge Method Wakeside Lake 11/16/2018 Craig Hobbs 18190 Chad Bare Partly Cloudy Material Description: Poorly Graded Gravel w/sand Native 18190-1 136.7 Laboratory Compaction Charactoristics of Soil (ASTM D698/1557 AASHTO T 99/180)(ASTM D698/1557, AASHTO T-99/180) LL:-PL:-PI:- Moist:X Eagle Rock Engineering has performed a proctor on the sample referenced below. The testing was performed in accoraccordancedance wwithith currencurrentt AASHTOAASHTO or or ASTMASTM standstandardsards. ThThee resuresultslts obtaobtainedined iin o n our ur laboralaboratorytory were as were as follfollows:ows: Manual: Sample ID: Sand Equivalency: ASTM D2487 Classification Sample Preparation: 18190-1 --- X Wakeside lake, native poorly graded gravel with sand 18190 - Wakeside Lake 1-Nov-18 Source: Project: Date Obtained: GP w/ sand Dry:Mechanical: AASHTO T-99:AASHTO T-180: ASTM D698:X ASTM D1557: Assumed Point Percent Dry Maximum Sp. Gr. Number Moisture Density Dry Density 2.50 1 4.7 120.4 124.9 lbs/ft^3 Optimum % Moisture 6.9 % Sample Preparation: Test Standard:Method C 2 6.4 125.4 ASTM D-4718, Correction 3 8.6 121.7 for Oversize Particles 4 9.9 117.3 136.7 lbs/ft^3 Sieve Percent Size Passing 6.0"100 129 0 Proctor Curve 3.0"75 2"72 1.5"72 1.0"66 3/4"57 1/2"43 3/8"35 #4 27121 0 123.0 125.0 127.0 129.0 ry Density#4 27 #8 24 #16 24 #30 21 #40 19 #50 15 #100 5 #200 23 115.0 117.0 119.0 121.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0Dr #200 2.3 Respectfully submitted,Reviewed By: Chad Bare Eagle Rock Engineering Lab Manager Percent Moisture