HomeMy WebLinkAboutREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - Madison, Sugar City - 08-00292 - Comprehensive Plan - 2020 AdoptionREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
PROVISION OF LAND USE PLANNING STRATEGIES
MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO AND THE CITIES OF SUGAR
CITY AND REXBURG, IDAHO
Proposals Due: < Insert Date RFP dug>
Madison County, Idaho, (population Insert population ) and the cities of Sugar City ( insert
population ) and Rexburg, Idaho ( insert population ).(hereinafter the "Participating
Govemments"), participating mutually together, seek Proposals from planning Firms/Consultants for the
formulation and Implementation of reciprocal and coordinated communication and decislon-making between
the Participating Governments for land use, transportation, annexation, development standards and
approvals, and the coordinated and efficient provision of services and Infrastructure by the Participating
Governments. The Participating Governments wish to formulate and establish an efficient decision making
framework that allows them to work cooperatively together to formulate policies and implementation actions
necessary to address land use, transportation, Infrastructure and services Issues that may have an Influence
across local jurisdictional boundaries. The proposal must provide for reciprocal notice and decision making
coordination between the Participating Governments and must comply fully with all statutory requirements
of Idaho law. In addition, comprehensive plan updates and completion shall be completed for Madison
County and the City of Rexburg ModificatQns to the City of Sugar City's comprehensive plan. If any are
identified as being necessary shall be made as recommendations only.
The Participating Governments require that all Proposals presented to the Participating Governments provide
a response to the following Items;
1. The Name of the Planning Firm or Consultant presenting the Proposal.
2. A Planning Firm or Consultant's Company Profile identifying;
a. Resumes of all Principles and Resumes of all Staff assigned to the Project
b. Contact information, Including the name of the Firm/Consultant Manager responsible and
assigned to the Project.
c. A description of the specific experience of the Firm/Consultant to provide Intergovernmental
coordinated planning strategies.
3. A listing of all work related to the formulation of Intergovernmental coordination and planning
completed over the last five (5) years, including project detalls, time and budget required to
completion, and providing examples of such work.
4. A Client List for similar projects, providing Name and Contact information.
S. A statement Identifying any existing or previous association or relationship with any of the
Participating Governments, or any association or relationship with an Individual, business,
corporation or other entity that may be associated in the past or now with any of the
Participating Governments.
6. A proposed Project Work Plan identifying the Firm/Consultant's approach to the Project,
Including; Delehed: anti
a. A statement specifically Identifying the Firm/Consultant's approach, tasks,'9chedules an , Deleted: to
deliverables lnprovic ng the Participating_Governments_with_an_approach_tp_____"__________.,:_"_ DeJetedoe
Intergovernmental coordination and comprehensive plan completion for Madison County
and the City of Rexburg.
b. The methodology to Identify Issues and needs of the Participating Governments and how
the Firm/Consultant will identify appropriate strategies to be Included to promote
consistency In decision making and long-term coordination between the Participating
Governments.
c. The Firm/Consultant's approach to creating a strategy to resolve any conflicting goals and
the implementation of general plan policies that have an effect cross Jurisdictional
boundaries.
d. The strategy for regular monitoring and update of decisions within the existing structure
and resources of the Participating Governments, including possible financing options for
monitoring, updates, and Implementation.
e Commitment statement agreeing to provide the participating governments with electronic - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
editable copies of all documents produced including but not limited to completed
cgrrno ehensive plans The electronic format should be specified and should be compatible
with existing eouipment used by the participating aovemments
7. Recommendations as to how BYU-Idaho land uses can coordinate and Integrate with existing
and future uses of the participating governments.
8. Firm/Consultant's Fee Schedule, Identifying the Hourly Fee of all Principles and all Staff
assigned to the Project.
All Proposals presented to the Participating Governments, and responsive to this Request for Proposals, shall
not exceed fifteen (15) pages and ten (10) copies of the Proposal shall be submitted. To be considered fully
responsive to this Request for Proposals all Proposals shall provide a response to the seven (7) items
Identified herein.
Following a review of the Proposals presented to the Participating Governments, one (1) Firm/Consultant
may be selected as best qualified to provide the services, or several Firms/Consultants may be Invited to
make an In-person presentation of their Proposal to representatives of the Participating Governments before
a Flrm/Consultant is selected and a contract awarded. The Participating Governments will select a
Firm/Consultant to provide the intergovernmental coordination and planning services on the ability and
experience of the Firm/Consultant to provide the services contemplated.
All questions related to this Request for Proposals should be directed toQary_4elgness'+._ acting on behalfof__.- Odeted: Mr. Craig Rindhsbacher
..
the Participating Governments, and all Proposals should be received no later than 5:00 PM
<typically allow a minimum of 21 days> 2006 to:
Mr. Cory Lglknp,557
Deleted: Craig Rincilisbacher
Phone: 208-354-3020 ext. 310. ........ _ .............
_----- _--------- ..---------------- . - Deleted:7
Email: galyl@rexburgPrg........... ..................._._ Deleted: craigr
Dated this day of .2006