HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPPLICATION - 96-00019 - 27 & 29 S 5th W - New TwinhomeDate of Application
Street Addresst
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING HERMIT
CITY E REXBURGf TDAHO
Permit
CONTRACTOR
Street Address
Mailing Addre AcjC,. Mai -ling
City, State
C ty State
Zip�j �_�Q'� _Te 1 ephone b�j � S6Mz ip
Architect or Engineering Fj-rm
I
—
Mobile Telephone
Ida. L is f A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACH COI --;Y IF NECESSARY
Lot No. BloCk
Job Address
. t Information
Residence
Subdivision
T
(To be coml app 1 is int
Coram. i -on l Gov
D411
•fir
ReligIOUS
E -,-Patio carport Garage Awning
Structure F New Remodel Addition Repai"-r Renewal
' 1 Number Stories i fBuilding
a ,
footage.* Unfinished Basement 7,
Finished Basement
What will structure be used for incline name of business if
applicable)?
If use is multiple filunits
go
Total Estimated Cost UBC UseClass*fication
9�7
ad droTax ypeZonei
Building Permit Fees 40-
�6 �---� Plan check Fees As
Plumbing Permit Fees
Water & Sewer Hookup fees
Signature of Applicant
Signature of Building Inspec, or
Issued by
Digging Permit Fees
Other Fees
t
R
Excavati-on &
E a r t hw o r j
SUBCONTRACTOR LIST
Concrete : �,�-D �
Masonry s .w
Roof ing!
Insolation:
Drywall:
Paititing#
Floor Coverings.9
:
Plumbing;
Heat inch0 ..
Electrical:
Roof Trusses,
29
0
-C
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
(MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER)
Floor / Ceiling Joists:
Cabinets:
S11-dj'-r1g/E4xt. for TrX111
L h
now
r
I
I
A
2)
m
m
z
0
m
Njul
M�w
77
M,
z LJ
0
1
m
m
L
T
0
I
&M.
M3
�n
M
-13 rohm,
M
M
C
0.
M
0
A
2)
m
m
z
0
m
Njul
M�w
77
M,
z LJ
0
1
m
m
L
T
0
I
&M.
M3
0
z
c
(A
CD
ARW z
>
z
3
CD
M
MEW Pr
0
Ln
mmiaw
0
0
Pin
O -ft
X
ARW z
I I r I
-4
t
m
I
MEW Pr
0
0
mmiaw
0
0
Pin
O -ft
X
(D
I I r I
-4
t
m
I
CITY QF REXBURG
Building Inspection Sequence
INSPECTIONS
Types of Inspections: r on-site construct ion y from time to time
thebuilding official, notification from the permit holder or his
agent, shall make or cause to be made any necessaryinspections and shall
ither a rove that -onion of the construction as com feted or shall
notify the permit holder or his agent wherein the same fails to comp l y
with this code.
le Layout: Lot corners staked, staking in piace for buildingr prior t
excavation.
2. Foot i Commonly made after poles r piers are set or trenches or
basement areas are excavated. Forms and horizontal reinforcing in place
vertical reinforcing cut and on job sit r tied 'in place.
3. Foundation 1r t ion : The foundation inspection shall include
excavations for thickened i intended for the support of bearing l 1
art i ions , structural supports, or equipment and special requirements for
wood foundations. All forms and r i .i r i 1, etc., shall be -in place.
4. Truss Inspection: Designs and installation information must be
submitted to the City beforedelivery of true * Inspection of trusses to
see they meet shop drawing, requirements and that they are installed and
braced adequately .
5. Plumbi Mechanical and Electrical: rough inspection: Commonly
made prior to coveringr concealment, before fixtures are set, and prior
to framing inspection.
6. Frame and Mas-onry f n s 1 . mmn l made after the roof,
masonry, all framing, firestopping, draftstoppin and bracing are in place
and after the plumbing, mechanical and electrical rough inspections are
approv.
:
Lzit h r Wallboard I ect iron:Commonly made after all lathing
and/or wallboard interior in place, but before any plaster is applied,
r before wallboard jointsand fasteners are taped and finished.
. Fl"nal Plumbing and He,atin2.inspect ion 1l systems in place,
fixtures set, ready for occupancy.
9. Final Electrical: Fi t r and wall covers .in place. ] it for
completed in panel box.
10. Final Ins ectiCommonly made after the building i's completed and
ready for occupancy.
1-1. an Permit: Issuedwhen, final inspect ion , building i
ready to occupy.
12, Other Inspections: In addition to the called inspections above, the
building department may make or r .i -re any other inspections to assert 1
Compliance with this code and other laws enforced by the building department
INSPECTION CARD
The permit holder or hisagent shall post the inspection record on the
I.
3obsite in ars accessible and conspicuous place to allow the building
official to make the required ntri The record shall be maintained
the permit holder until the final inspect ion has been made and approved.
I have read the above and wiLL comply in my requests for inspections
by giving 24 HOUR NOTICE prior for inspection to be rncxde.
Electrical; 359-3025 (B: 0C3-9. QU a.m,) Ext 325
Building & Plumbing: 359-3026 EXto 326
County Plumbing: 652-7210
___
L
LoA
)D V -L 0 ur Fi t c,
ALL FCu -t I 4t cl
A C)
I -J-0-1
0
0
w
F-woAl
Top,
Lot s S-� (o b r
c.,o��t
('�kA
Srti
t.�lcst' t WlV�tx S�.
APPROVED
a
BUILDING iNsr-Ecron
ps
NILE L. BLE
RICHARD H RiN E R, TREASURER
DATE 0
T:
NAME
COMPANY
FAX # 0
STATE OF IDAHO
FAX TETT
7 f
vow
SHEET
12 NORTH CENTER STREET
REXBURG, IDAHO 83440
P (208) 359-3020
61 -ROM NAME ffl!;�
CITY OF REXBURG
P 0 BOX 280
REXBU'RGj IDAHO 83441
FAX # (208) 359-3022
PHONE # (208) 359-3020��,'' 7' 40i -21V
Please forward this fax transmittal to the above named
Additional message.
individual.
S
0'
7ZA41
THIS IS PAGE 1 OF �_ PAGES
/,40f Td
,5:711 05 Vj 6
AC -1 a Ap 407
/ a- r
101,r
Ap
XI.ING CQUE—EXCEPTION, 6
The lot widths shown on this plat do not meet the minimum lot widths requiredm the City of
Rexburg Zoning Code (Ordinance X77vThis . Zero Lot Line Develo
0 W WO�I hiffo Cf
lot widths were approved by the Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission under a Conditional
Use Pemift dated 'Taj e, 2 �, , / 9 9
�a
Mr. Gagner explained that they looked at several alternatlYea to th8
franc AMthalt and what they found is they always hit conflict wit} the
tel.ept7one poles and guide wires,
Davawn asked if the corner 10t that is 56 t wide was going to be
introduced as a common area for everyone, Mr. Gagner said yes and
ale of Otfier areas that would
there would not be fencing in the back but everybody wou.ld have a fence
between units so they could have a private atio. The
be passed legal as o n sl
p to each party but it will X" a w 11
be declared as
common area to be used and left open. The fence bet
ween un.'ts will be
10' long. Each of the homes will range between 1168-1244 square feet.
SOme will have ill basements, others will not,
Richard asked ' chi pro was t'
� �r
moron Stephen said it is i -n
common as per use but not per ownership.Richard
asked how that woriced
as per sub section 5. Stephen said as lore
g as they tran,sfer the
ownership, and each unit. nOwnership,
11y describing
IS Common maintenance,, It s they shall have no property in common
s to ownership. ry Gagner Said that by defining the back area as
common maintenance it doesn't give them a problem in getting someone in
there to maintain J* t. They will all have there own individual lots but
they wi'!I all agree that they
ill maintain thatk s--ri. , What Ted
explained to Stephen was that -it ill l
ar to condomini'LUMS where
they have
common r I
homeownersagreement the
same as Summerwood.Richard was still concerned
Intent of the Council �. It doesn't
say common ownership it saysCOMMOrtif Stephen said none of them will have propertY in common. n What
they Will have is a maintenance agreement. None of these people will
own any Portion of each others property. They Will be required as part
of buying into t `,
to agree to a general maintenance person
so that all of the landscaping uniform
of the res.trict*It will be t
(D Ive covenants that illallow permanent access,
P
John felt if YOU'looked at it as a duplex, as far as it impacts the
City, then he had no problem with the width.
Mra Gagner said they requested both a C!.UPP,, and deviati-on on 2 items.
That 's what the letter requested. Stephen
C.U.P. on the lot width but they were misinformed on -the driveway
(asphalt coverage); tliat: has to be done with a variance.
intereSt of time he recommended that they count thiLs meeting as a
preliminary and have a motion as to whether or not they believe it is
justified to go to a public hearing on a variance.
L
Board was co : nfused as to why they did not fill out a C,U.p.
application,41 They aaid they
were not given a specific for
m and were
unaware of one, Stephen felt that the confusion arose from the way
obtained frommust be
h lanriing and
i r
Ing COffirn*ssionll *at The application
really needed to be filled out but* I
gl council is that they coin
act upon his letter based ion what he was told by the legal government
P
agency, The variance would need to be applied
coverage.
John Wagon madam a motiion that he be allowed a Conditional. Use for
�h1.s ro ' ect and that then opens up the avenue to permLot him to fl .11
out an application dor the variance. Stephen said if he elects to
YeCOrifigure the dr'vecaay to get within the 30B he would need no more
approval or a variance. Richard seconded the motion. All Aye.
(DISCussion of a variance) Richard moved that they recommend that a
variance go to public hearing conditioned upon the proper filling with
the Cityof an p aLc , ion for a VarDance
h payment fees aTid
reviewed Joe, Mike seconded the moti I
.0nft All Aye.
Next item on theagenda was the MillhollowF
on #2
John Barnes, surveyor, was present representing
Millhollow Subdivision lots have already
meets and bounds and this Subdivision As to include
new
lots to east the requirements of the State. lie is there looktng
for their blessing cont n � ��IP
r D c . On the bottom that
r*911t of way does nOt cOmply with the 60' requirement, This is
pending.. fie has found that there -is ars existing road right of way
there and he hasn't got it platted yet, He wants to get it legally
platted before he completes lot C - the lot furthest
Richard ked if the areak llow on Millhollow was going to
be considered right of way. Joe said he drew that up and the area
marked in yellow i's what would be the 251 front yard setbacke John
noted that the others are significantly out there further - less of a
setback. Richard asked him then if lot A was -going to have a 15 foot
width house on it. Ile said he didn't have any ob'ect*on to the
subdivision. The problem I
they approve these su - J - ions and then
the lots get sold and then somebody walks'in here and says I can't
build a house on this lot because I didn't know I had to have setback
there. The fact of the matter is, these vacant lots have been sold
prior to them ever being platted. He struggles with the way it has
been done because these people who have bought these lots don't ever
Intend to cofnply v;ith any
setback. Davawn said the same erson h as
bought lits
Marsha said if the City widens the road people will lose yards,
*1boxes, etc. Joe said that the back of s`dewalk would be withiLn 20
ma I
feet of the garage of the southerly most house. The two middle houses
Will be beyond the 25' fronL yard set back and the northerly house will
be about 20' beyond the setback. There i's a problem witi-I lots A & 13 in
that they.do not meet the 1200 square foot minimum lot area for a LDR
r
Zone. his question is * -iin the
City, how can you have it be an
LDR. Zone. Stephen said the 3 extra lots would be Agriculture I in theTmpact Zone. If there iS common ownership in the north lots it sljoLlid
be platted as one lot. If the others are LDR youcan riot down zone the
is LDRw (Discussion)
Mro :Sipherd created theproblem himself.
and then he sold