The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLETTERS - 97-00047 - Madison County - Juvenile Detention Center - Remodel10 �i FAA 208 359 2271 4; pt ir 4ed;b August 147 1998 City of Rexburg 12North Center H Attn: Joe Laird Facility Center Detention Re. Region, VII 3uvenile Dear Joe, 4 U '.! issue h -A IcrePlease be advised that Monday, 10 I was of the smoke while, meeting with the Madison.'County.Commissioners. Qn Tuesday I -met with Lon Ricks, electrical contractor for:Shaok Construction and directed him to seal the conduits at once.. Furthermore, 1, discussed the idea of installing a fire alarm system in this. area and tyirrfc desicyn and cost it into the systemin the JuvenilepreliminaryZ:pCenter. I have requested a from my electrical .eng.ineer-and be prepared to review 'Olt- with the County at my 24 you, postedmeeting. on this. August1'*w 'keep' ery truly yours, cc atson Jerry ESA Dee Owens Lon Ricks Shook Con structioll "._W_pqY0TV&I 61"Y1. -IFYn (208) 359-230al slid fled CerUfled By: .C.... ftyfrn f%V FR 1 1. G . 9 11, 22 1 �� JR1V ASSOC_ 1208 359 3022 CIT F U .44 ra fi.11iL1A1 11 To: IF r�.ina Y Daftem Joe Laird .aa* * I F1 Re: Region V11 Juvenile Detention Center P" ., The Fire Department responded to a fire call at this facility on August 11, 1998. On our arrival, there was no fire present just some smoke. The smoke came fro an air compressor in the basement that the motor burnt out on. The smoke appeared to have traveled up some wire chases that were not sealed'into the control room. t think that these chases should have beers sealed. L talked to Blair and he said he had not checked that. I was wondering who should be contacted about getting this fixed if istirequired. 6 would suggest that they consider .installing smoke detection in the basement. This was not required by the UFC, but as this situation shows there could a fire in the basement for quite a period of time with out anyone becoming aware of it provided the chases were sealed. " -1 February 15, 1997 ASSM-IATES Madison County Commission i.O.DOzJ .A9 K burg, Idaho 83440 Atte: Jerry. Jeppesen Chairman Re: Jail Pr eCt Dear Jerry, Please fnd'ene osed the following inf IO. U: Ross Parkinson letter 9 Febniaxy�l997 Bateman -Hall, Inc. letter 12 Febnary 1997 This letter is written xo document the events thatT rPC C d Mr. Parkinson's c P , .M P la; int. Prior to biddiitn0C1xps inet with t6.2tUY0f Rexburg and'the dire department t o II estabfishnot)onlyhetrequirement fora i re hydrant b4tth.apProxtee �Io04U0It was discovered that the width of the alley is 31eA1TVeyoljocafied ec erifer of the allVY and -b y measuring NTUhae cdga of the alley was established. It was noted that the 0vmrhe�ad power lines and chainiink,fence ax:� effectivelontheeasemenhney consistent with this I6-112 Biot di�nens�on. The Park�pson'swood fence romehes>into the alley.216.3 ieex-bey��a tide easement. In Meeting an tiie site with-Delynn'�dsitum, ane fre'd-artn0 thgical place tq-put;tl�e hydrant was on the easement line. 'Val agreed to rebuild the fence around the hydr�,txtspn as practical. i asked Val;of times if he.had communicated with the property owners and it was repeatedihat---.-h;�,'Oei- had. -c]itia pxQ6lem:s nce the Parkinson's - 4 �-i � v �i y w u��. v�r��.: � � Ean rc�vuer �.t.:�:�h�` when power line -was relocated to, the ed of theirgpr'oty � I� b�li�v� the ptep� r per proce s were folvwed E9 - i . '� I 4P qP y 0 1� .f 0 the appropriate individuals communicated with to not only establish the actual property lines but to locate the fire hydrant as well. The City or the County need to discuss I �� + ins thW1-- r. on the actat his fence encroaches the allev thme,�� n� & congested si�� l i� �o� 1GCc� J p Monday, 24 February,Commission meeting, I Very Truly Yours, John R. Watson W, 13 creating a 11 � i � � 1 11 `- 1 WED f II; j I j xr I Ross ani Ruby ParLnson L94 Fj&o4 2aA N" Rox6m U&6 MAO HW" Kenn 208-wSill-W19 i12 FOmiry 09., 1 t i �Nlc a .4 It Hall Iricill Lanjj W141dAing I � E aF 140 5 F"cotc Dr. Idalu, I IDs $3402 RE: i. j nauthorizod Usc of PropeM Ift of ng oonstniction of the Madison County Jail in Rcxbur& building material was plaocd an our PUSGIVO PrOPMY lacatod in the Alloy between l�iain Strad and Fast I � North, without prior aodwriration. q.that .yid maicrial was recnovcd the first woek of January .1997 after we had aomaaod the foreman Val Iamb. RcpF:�pd mcs9ages left to your aticntion, wcrc never rdumed. In dv^.-4ing with the City Plarming and Zon'l'ng Committee, the following datw have been cst8blishod (or gent due, for u:•.c of said property . at S 100 per day. Atipst I St - Doccmbet 31st 1( )96 � 153 days at $1000) per day ToW doe for cera: $j5o3(X)AX) if; a - -i svpirements are as foll(m &Iic. prpway fnusE be mumM Lo prior condition, A11 remibuild�n� tenhl arxVor ddb%is iuus1 be temat►Cd. �� • 1cxjuj rLA said lox must be leydod aW the fen(x mnnirg North- Saute must tic Mpllaoed. Thi::ztaour must bc rWificd witWo 10 busIAM djky& 4x it wilx be turned over to our Attorlicy, Air, -Anher vi' Ol��on or dogwion Ofthxs pfqxrty "s probibilodIll 4 9 IL Jt�- 1 114 TSIANaHAi r L.. — 1997 4 Kos& and Ruby Parkinson 121 East 2"d North RL,,, burg, (D, 83440 R: Madison County ]'ail 'C6 Whom it May Concern: 0 a a= H t- P - TO 3. GENERAL CONTRACTORS PKqMMULL fel C'!!iMh_F P.O. BOX 1464 • IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 8,3403-1464 1405 FOOTE QRJVE • IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83402 PM. (2Q8) 523-268 1 ol FAX (208) 52A•4435 X :An in r+ ipt of your letter of Feb. 9, coneerning what you ire ca Ifing unauthoriz�# use of' private property, During the construction of this facllity I am awAre that we uriloadcd some material on your property. We were Contacted by Mr. Greg who indi"cated that we were can private propeny that belonged to you and would we make �-f. angements to have it removed. He also indicated that he had talked to Val Amb, our f J0+) site superintendent., concerning the property as will. Val then immediately removed t1_• : matc�a�s, The m��a1s that were on your property were there for les.s they two W *.;Cks and were removed immediately upon your requezt, I t" vou had any real Problemwith the action that we t�o� 1 w��ld �ss�rr�e that YOU would lik-ye t�c��i#�ed me iris Writ�►�il some months �cxr� p A;14nm��r.ra .Yrn*e.•:nE., ..� .....__� _s.► - - - Ay aaKi4�It& N U1 11 �I'Ei�ir III& i,.iperty for the length of time that you have indifiCated end i don't believe t�a� the amountt�'" 31}0r1c;Y. that YOu are xCque$tin� is fair or re&sonable. Ir: regards tp the use cif the alley, our contract document indicate that -we are to fence it t) . i��u both ends and that we are tci install a new fire hydrant in the exact location that it h, .. Ixen installed, The fence that has been taken down was to install the fire hydrant in 1 e&Liocment and will be reinstalled when and as we are directed by the county and city to reinstall it so that the fire department has access to the new hydrant, I oologize for any misunderstandi�tg or inconvenience that we may have caused you, The c4.��-rent situ�tion in r��ards to the alley being closed and additionW work being perro ed in i hA eas&m�nt will unf�rtun�te�� continue until the project is completed NV A however, continue to make evety effon to keep all construct maty ff �►our property as requested by Mr.Whkm4re and as we have done w:.ix made. next fall, We ��ig�.4 and supplies since the request f r l I'do' not believe that any damage of any ki"nd has been done to your property outside of the enement area. 'Chen is still work to be completed in the easement area and that Will bc- restored to its. original condition once the work in this area is completed. M15liI1dG1Stfllidl(Ig Of inwfIVeI[I2Cl'� t�1'dt W6 I��j► ave cause you or that we mav cause you in until tl� pro1, @C� iQ �pmpl2��d. Sincerely, P iti1'E14"mALL, INC., { Pn.�.s'len cc John Watson j Lanny Wilding. Val Lamb Scott Hall i i i NILE L. BOYLE MAYCIa ROSE BAGLEY uLERK RICHARD HORNER FttEASUREA 3 FINANCIAL DFMEA Mr. John Watson J RW Associates 49 Professional Plaza Rexburg, Idaho 83440 STAT. OF IDAHO December 1 1, 1997 RE. Region V11 Juvenile Detention Facility Dear John, 12 NORTH CENTER STREET RF.X8EIRG, WHO 83440 PHONE (208) 359-3020 l want to emphasize that the City his approved the Bu Iding Permit for the subject building as we feel that theimprovements you have designed into the buildings. have rade it safer than the original as 'is intended in paragraph 4 of Section 3403.2 0f the UBC; consequently, the following comments are not SQfT]@thln(1 wi-? ora nninfn Q+nom, construction over. Please consider t discussion between you & i, 1 hem as being in the category or a personal - Reference is made to your leiter of November 26, 1997 and my previous letter of November 21, 1997. My concern is with Items 3 & 4 which have to do with the ramp and doors an the north side of the building. ten, _ _ _ _ .. and that it is not a pubfic ramp. It is my u �►+-s U� i iNi IctJ14� �� #c3! till i�mp is exiSunq nderstanding that when considering "nandicapped accessibility" related items, one mush consider not only the public bud also the fact that some of the sheriff's deputies, clerical help, secretaries, cooks, etc. as well as some. of the prisoners in the detention area may be handicapped._ Many, if not most, of these people will be using these north doors and ramp. Handicapped accessibility for future employees (as well as prisoners) is becoming a much more frequently encountered issue. In this particular insance, i imagine you could possibly get by an ASA challenge with a 36" wide ramp rathehan the 44" ramp required by UBS Sections 1004,10 and 1007.2, iF the ramp met the slope and landing requirements and IF the door(s) were recessed and the opening(s) wide enough to allowsomeone in a wheel char to turn from the narrow ramp, approach and open the door and enter the building on their own. The attached Figures 1 & 2 depict reconstructing the ramp to the west to meet the UBC and ADA standardzl This doesn't appear to create much of a problem in the area. The doors 23 & 25 (maybe 23 would be enough) could be widened slightly and inset as shown I�I� ��C�lp �P��. � �� i�Gr dO�C COI�I� 0 L 0 �P In the crrc�e of meeting 1 attend, we're told that personal ADA challenges rega din the lark of handicapped accessibility at public buildings are becomin mach more frequent.�I vvc�ufd hate to see you rebuild anew ramp �arrd doors #had dant meed ADA then see them challengd in a year o�- two and have to be tarn o ��ards, over a0aan. I know it w9uld bt� � iitfle mon� �� ani reconstructed a1f and flatten the ramp to meed ADA and USC standards, but I really think it would be the cheapest thing to do in the long run. Thanks for your consideration of this possibility. Very truly yo rs, Oil, JOSEPH A. LAIRD, P.E. -1 CITY ENGINEER & BUILDING OFFICIAL NOU�ID�]�I 15,1997 Shook Construction 6782 NorthAlbert Lane Idaho Falls, ID 8,3401 x Ac -0% CCIP0 - - -- - - -- - - - 49- PROFESSIONAL PLAZA (208) 359-2309 KIP% qetko 196 i IN & *4 ILIJ 0 :_� QualftUons Certified By N.C.A.R.B., RMUIRG, EDAHO FaX359 - 2271 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARGHITECrUM RIMMVEOIJ MaDS IG CC)NSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT REGION VII JUVENILE DETENTION F IN ATTENDANCE•, [vo TS OF C 0 RACTpR LIST: BUILDING PERMIT•. CONSTRUCTIO SUBMITTALS,• TESTING•. UTILITIES•. PLANS: ADDENDUM: DISCUSSION6 - . TACT: NILE L. B Y L MAYOR ROSE BAGLEY NIK�s RICHARD HO E TR EASURER & f1MAN C I A� O S E Mr. Jahn Watson JRW Associates 49 Professional Plaza Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Re: juven"lle Detention Facility STATE OF IDAHO November 21, 1997 PC. BOX 280 12'NOPTH CATIP �TPUT REXBURG, IDAHO 83440 PHONE (208) 359-3020 FAX {208} 359-342 We have the foHowing comments on the plans -far the subject building renovation: 1 -- Shts., SD -1, SD -2 & A-2 — This east entrance (Doors moan pur)Hc entrance to the Juvenile Detention Facilities. 1 & 2) will apparently be the The vehicle parking for fJt=uNlC LU1 1 IHY tu ane juvem€e uetention F-acility wHi either be on this east side or, in the new parm ng lot on the sough side of the Courthouse. Sic. 1103.2.3 - Accessible Entrances (211d Paragraph) indicates that: "When a building or facility has entrances which normally serve accessible parking facilities, transportation fac] I [ifies, passenger loading pones, taxi stands, public streets, and sidewalks, or accessible Interior vertical access, then at least one of the entrances serving each such function shalt comply with the accessible route prcwisions of CABOIANSI Al 17. 1, The entrances on the north side of the building wiif, apparently, 'not.be accessible to the public as they will he gated -off; therefore this entrance is left as the only one with any real public accessibility. A handicapped accessible ramp could be constructed to the south of the new steps relatively easily. I assume the vehicle parking on this easy side will be converted to one handicapped stab and three visitor parking stalls. Z -- Shts. SD -1, SD -2, SD -3 & A-2 — Your 1994 UBC Analysis (Sht. A-2) indicates there ate 51 occupants of the building; therefore. at least 2 exits are required from the building. You have 4 entrances/exits from the building. Sic, 1103.2.3 - Accessible Entrances indicates that: " At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be accessible, ,, Seg. 1,104.1.1 - General indicates that: When more than one exit is required from any accessible space, each accessible portion of the spare shat! be sewed by nit fess than two accessible means of egress." Therefore, beth the easy entrancelexit and one of the entrance/exits on the north side of the building should be handicapped accessible. — ts., .27 SD -3, A-2 & A-4 IF -- UBC Seg. 1004.1 Lanclings shall have a length measured in the directio lncne5,jj P��n �ht�, SQ -2 & SD -3 don't �peCific�lly ide�tif� hou wide lkp.. ramp a1onq the north si indicates it 0 Landings at Doors, stades that: r� of travel of not less khan 44 cle ot the building is intended to be. The above referenced UBC Sec. would have to be at least 44 inches wide at the doors. UBC Section 1007.2 Ramp Widths, states that.- "The width of ramps shall be determined as specified in Section 1003.2, but shall not be less than 44 inches, except as specified herein. Ramps serving an occupant load of 49 or less shall not be less than 36inches in width." The total occupant load of 51 is used when makino this uu��rminaz�on or wnetner the ramp has to be 44 inches dor 361nches) wide.(See attached EXAMPLE I -- Ramp VVidth which comes from the UBC bode Applications Manual - Questions & Answers.) It therefore appears that this ramp should be at feast 44 inches wide. However, even with a 44 inch wide ramp, there ars stip problems with the two doors and their landings. UBC Sec. 1007.4 -- Landings (2rldparagraoh) stades that- "Doors in any pvsi#ivn shat1 not r�c��r-�► fhp mi�,im;��, r,m,n��.��..� ..� _ _ . ------ii.71V11 VI L1lC ldilC#lilil Til IP_CC rrrar� 42 inches and nail not reduce the re uir�ti width b o� the doo r � w more than 3-'/2 inches when full rs and landings as shown do not meet this requirement. �Note that this o�cilr�n s requirement for doorway clearances at ramp landings a�-e more stringent than those in Sec. 1004.10 - Landings at Doors.} CABO/ANSI Al 17.1 also has requirements for handicapped access maneuvering clearances at doors. See attached Fig. B4113.6 (b) and ( c) from this CAB,O/ANSI manual which indicates that wider landings are necessary at doors depending upon the approach to the door, the door siring and the type of closer and latch on the door. Obviousiy, these depictions do not fake into account the requirements. of Sec. 1007.4 - Landings set forth in the preceding paragraph. 4 — Shts. SD -2, SD -3, A-2 & �4-4 — UBC Sec. 1007.3 -- Slope, indicates that the ramp nope shall not be greater than 1 unit vertical in 12 units horizontal- therefore, one or both cfi the ramps on the north side of the building should have a slop� no steeper than 1.-12. Section 4.8 of CABO/ANSIA'� 17.1 also shows the need dor ramp slopes of 1 : 1 2 or fess except for short rises of 3" to 6" where steeper stapes can be used.(See attached Sic. 4.8 and drawings of ramp slopes �rnm CAB�lANS1,) Nate their requirement that a ramp landing is required if the rise is larger than 30`. 5. — Sht. A-2 & M-3 -- The 94 UBS Analysis on Sht. A-2 does not mention that the building will have a sprinkling system. Sht. M-3 shows a de -tail of a Fire Sprinkler 'Riser Diagram and the Specifications include specs. for a Wet Pipe Fire Sprinkler Protection System, so 1 assume the project incudes an au�flma#ic fire sprinkling pg -2 system. UBC Section 904.2.6 - Group I occupancies of co�r-s�, requires an duLuinauc spnntuer system. Will the existing 2" waterline entering the building provide enough water for a sprinkling system or are you going to have to bring in a 6 " connection from 2"d East St? Also note the Fire np-nartrmanfc n"oq attached plan review. 6 — Shto A-2 & A-5 — You could use fh� EXCEPT�QN ��sted in UBC Sec. 308.2.2.2 Group !, Division 3 Occupancies if yflu wanted to use 2x4s & gypboard rather than 8" CMU's in the Administrative portion of the building. The fiFe sprinkling system could provide the I -hr. fire rating- 7—Sht.A-2—Is Dressing Rm 114formenlwomenorboth? UBCSection2902.3 indicates that: "Separate facilities shall be provided for each sex when the number of employeus exceeds four. Such toilet facilities shall be located either in such building or conveniently in a building adjacent thereto on the same property." Are there fewer than four employees? Or do you consider the toilet facilities in the adjacent Courthouse to be `'convenient" enough? 8 -- Sht. E-3 -- 11Vhy aren't there lighted EXIT signs over Doors 19, 2 & 37 or some combination thereof so the j4uveniles in detention have clear signing telling them how tc get out to someplace ifthere �s a f�re? Very truly urs JOSEPH A. LAIRD, P.E. .' CITY ENGINEER & BUILDING OFFICIAL ME J I A 50 percent greater multiplier is used dor stairways than for other exits such as corridors, rams and exit passageways since level and ramped egress facilities accom- modate about 50 percent more people than do stairways in the same time period. It is evident that the speed of exiting on the 5CdifS i5505211tially less than the speed of exiling on level or near -level surfaces. This 'is due to the force reduction in normal snide, as [he lengths of stride on a stair mist coincide with the stair run. A sturdy of this difference shows that the stair width needs to be increased by 50 percept moue the width used for level or ramped exiting. Tie 0.3 -inch -per -person (7.&2 mm) multiplier is based on 2 2 inches �559 mm) of exit stair width far an occupant toad of 75 persons, The 0.2 -inch -der -person (5.08 MM) rnultipher [5 based ars 22 inches (559 mm) of level or ramped exit for an occupant load of 100 persons. The choice of 75 instead of the traditional figure of 60 persons applied to stair capacity is based on improved efficiency of the 7 -to -1 1 Mair -riser -to -run ratio. The relationship of exit width to occupant load is based on an egress flow -time performance of approximately 3.5 min- utes. For example, a rninimum stair width of 44 inches (11 -18 mm) is credited with a capacity of 441.3 = 147 persons, and 44 -inch (1118 mm) corridor i5 credited with a capacity of 44/0.2 = 224 persons. This means that a sustained crowd o€147 persons on a 44 -inch (1118 mm) stair or 220 persons in a 44 -inch (1118mm) corridor carp pass a point on the stair yr in the corridor in approximately 3.5 minutes. ■ Please explain how stairway width is determined ■ based an a floor"s having access to two stairways? ■ Section 1003.2 states, "The total width of exits in in- • ches (mm) shah not be fess than the total occupant load served oy an exit multiplied by D.3 (7-.62) for 5tairways and 0.2 (SAS) for qtIle!" E?CtfS €SOI' I e55 than SpE'CffleCI eISE'WheCL 1n CAIS code." It further states, "Such width of exits shafl be divided ap- proximately equally among the separate exits." Thus, for exam- ple, it two stairways serve a total occupant toad of 400 from the top story of a multistory building, the 4vidth of each stairway is based on an occupant ioad of one half o{400 = 200 occupants, The required width is 200 x 0.3 = 60 inches = 5 feet 0 524 mm}. �. When dealing w'th the subject of the mr`nimuMwid#h of stair- ways addressed in Section 1006.2, the application is d-ifferent..' The first sen tence in this section states, "The minimum stairway width shall be determined as specified in Section 1003.2 but shall not be less than 44 inches (I 718 mm) except as specifiled herein." For the application of this provisioil, the occupant load being served is intended to be the total occupant load of the fl oo r th at the stairways are serving.-rhus, -vv lien a given fl oo r re- quires two exits and the occupant load of the floor is 50 or move., each of the stairways must have a 111inimum width of 44 inches (1118 mm). Section 1003.3 1003.3 Arrangement of Exits. If only two i is are required, they shall be placed distance apart equal to not less than one half the length of the maximum overall diagonal diniension of the or urea to be served measured in a stray ht line between exits.. %k., EXCEPTION: The separation between exit doors in the exit enclo- sures which are interconnect -ed by a OD -11 U r re -res i ti Ve CO tri NONSTRUCI PROJECTIONS At least one-half required width i 5 3 1/2" Max. on each side, or 7" Max. on one side 1 1I2" Max. on each side Ify VA WHEN X = Me THE REQUIR.E.D WIDTH 7"Nli s ANY OCCUPANT LOAD 7"MA; OCCUPANT LOAD OF LANDING 50 OR GREATER LANDINGS 'Teo e I i SEC,IITION LD 00 )s NONSTRUCI PROJECTIONS Y 5 3 1I2" Max. an each side, or 7'' Marc. an one side 1 1l2" Max. on each side Ily I `! rI KAAY SEN X = THE REQUIRED WIDTH N ANY OCCUPANT LOAD 3 %z MkN OCCUPANT LOAD OF LANDING 50 OR GREATER DOORS AT L-ANDINGS 0Al • if st 4 83 f 3 CABG S I Al 17.1-1992 PULL SIDE TFt*M�f�t+y=*=fit"*$„';rt*fit■f (a) Detail PULL SIDE ■� ■ F t r■ 7 f ti F i# i r a ■- ■ s #$ 4 i 4 y r t r ■ i ■ r, • ■ a ■ ■ a■a t f■ i t i yi�ri��sW-.�1.m......,.:r�-r■�.r.+M�F+y�ua..�+�i+t�+u�er.. ..+�.,■.w - �-, +� .ti -1 ? n-� 14 fly) Sliding Door" 32 miry F ig. B4.13.5 Glean Doorway Width and Depth {c} Folding Ivor x PUSH SIDE ri (a) Front Approaches — Swinging Door TE: x = 36 in (915 mm) mimnlum If v = 60 in 1525 nim } x = 42 in 1065 m mirii171Lill, if Y � 54 r (1370 mm). dcor has both '-,L1 kitch and a closer, (b) ��i -sidep.r ac-h� Swirl h7g Door OTE All doons ill al oe s Shzjj j co ll1 ly with t the -i t1l'alic ") 1-()I- Fig. B4. 13.656 Maneuvering Clearances at Doors PUSH SIDE X A has b()ta a ci s i- aTid a latch. (a) Front Approaches — Swinging Door TE: x = 36 in (915 mm) mimnlum If v = 60 in 1525 nim } x = 42 in 1065 m mirii171Lill, if Y � 54 r (1370 mm). dcor has both '-,L1 kitch and a closer, (b) ��i -sidep.r ac-h� Swirl h7g Door OTE All doons ill al oe s Shzjj j co ll1 ly with t the -i t1l'alic ") 1-()I- Fig. B4. 13.656 Maneuvering Clearances at Doors PUSH SIDE X A PULL SIDE r X 4 24 min S CABG/NSI Al17.1-1992 X 24 min PUSH SIDE TE: Y = 54 i ri (1370 11.1110 1)1i ii'l fi)u fii I r t he door NOTE: v _ 48 i 1220 in iii) ini n i rnu iii i f t he door 1ILLS a c laser. has a closer. (c) Latch -side Approaches — Swinging Door min (d) Front Approaches — Slidiii_q Door and Folding Doors mmmpa 7 �•1•Fari•is ai+l Sliding -Side roar Sliding Door and FoldingDoers TE: All doors M -Ifl oes- shall COMPlY WK11 the delir-erica s for Front tal)I)roaches. FAR 24 min Latch -Side Approach — Sliding Door and Folding Doois Fig. 84.13,E Maneuvering Clearances at Doors (continued) !!ia I �I.y�,. � a fi a � • i + + rf ■ + t y ■ t r s �♦ iM � + (d) Front Approaches — Slidiii_q Door and Folding Doors mmmpa 7 �•1•Fari•is ai+l Sliding -Side roar Sliding Door and FoldingDoers TE: All doors M -Ifl oes- shall COMPlY WK11 the delir-erica s for Front tal)I)roaches. FAR 24 min Latch -Side Approach — Sliding Door and Folding Doois Fig. 84.13,E Maneuvering Clearances at Doors (continued) CABC71ANS1 A1f7.1-992 mm} fang minimum located on each side of the curd ramp and within the marked crossing, See Fag. 84.7,9(0). 4.7.11 Islands. Raised islands i[I crossings shall be cut through leve! with the street or have curb ramps at both sides, and a level area 48 In (1220 mm) long minimum by 36 in (915 mrn} wide mini - MUM, in the part of the island intersected by the crossing. See Fig, g4.7.9(a) and (b). 4.8 Ramps 4.8.1 * General. A slope steeper than 1 _20 shall be considered a ramp and shall comply with 4.8, 4.8.2* Slope and Rise. Ramps in new construc- tion shall have a supe not steeper than 1 : 12. Tie rise dor any ramp run shall be Win (76Q mm) maxi- mum. See dig. B4.8.2. Gera ramps and ramps constructed on existing sites or existing buildings or facilities shall be permitted to have slopes and rises as shown in Table 4.8.2 provided space limi- tations prohibit use of a I : 1 2 nope or less. 4,8.3 Clear Width. The clear width of a ramp shall be 36 in (915 mm) minimum. See Fig. 134.8.3. 4.8.4 Landings. damps shall have level landings at bottom and dap of each run. Landings shall have the following features.- landing width shah be at least as wide as the widest ramp run leading to it. — landing length shall be 60 in (1525 mr�) minimum clear. ramps that change direction at landings shall have a 60 in by Sp in 0 525 mm by 1525 mm} minimum landing. — doorways located at a lending shall have ars area in front of the doorway which shad cam - ply with 4.13.6. 4.8.5 Hatidrails, Ramps with a rise greater than 6 in (15a mm) or a run greater than 72 in (1830 mrn) shatl have handrails complying with 4.3. 1 Q and 4.3.11, 4.8.6* Cross Slope and Surfaces. Cross nope of ramp surfaces shatl not be steeper than 1:48, damp surfaces shall comply with 4.5, 4.8.E Edge Protection. Fames and lar7df«gs shall have curb, walls, or railings that present people from traveling off the ramp or landing or shall pro- trude 12 in (305 mm) minimum beyond the inside face of the railing. Curbs or barriers stall be 4 in (100 mm} high minimum. See Fig. 84.8.3. 4.8.8 Outdoor Conditions_ Outdoor ramps and approaches to them shall be designed so that water will not accumulate on walking surfaces. 4.9 Stairs 4.9.1 General. Accessible stairsS11211 comply with .4.9. 4.9.2 Tread's and Risers 4.9.2.1 Dimensions. Ail steps an a flight of stags shall have uniform rifer heights and uniform tread depth. Risers shall be 7 in (18Q mm) maximum and 4 in 0 pp mm) high minimum. Triads shall be 11 1;1 (280 mm) deep minimum, measured from riser to riser. See Fick_ B4.9.2. 1. 4.9.2.2 peen Risers. Open risers are not permitted. 4.9,3 Nosings. Undersides of ndsings shall not be, abrupt. The radius of curvature at the leading edge of tread shall be 112 in {13 mm} maximum. Risers shall be sloped or the underside of the nosing shal! have an angle of 6.0 degrees minimum from the horizontal. Nosings shall protrude 1 1I2 in 138 mm} maximum. See Fig. B4.9.2.1, 4.9.4 Handrails. Stairs sha!l have handra"Is carry-': plying with 4.3.10 and 4.3.11. Table 4.8.E — Allowable ramp dimensions for construction in existing sites, buildings and facilities SI') Sleeper than 1 :10 but not steeper than 1 :8 Steeper than 1: 12 but not steeper than 1:10 1) A slope steeper than 1 'S shoe not be permitted. 0 Maximum Flee 'M 150 mm { t c Slopes steeper than 1:20 (1unat vertical in 20 units horizontal (5% slope)) shall be considered a ramp. Ramps in new construction shall be not steeper than 1:12, {1unit vertical in 12 units horizontal (8-.3% slope)) 30" (762 mm) maximum r��p_ a Cross slope of ramp surfaces shall not be steeper than 1.&48. (1 unit vertical in 48 units horizontal (2% slope)). Hand (.150 rails are required when the rib mm) or runreagter than 72" se exceeds 6" (1830 mm). Table 4.5.2—Allowable ramp dimensions for construction in existing stes, buildings and facilities. Slope 1r) Steeper than 1: 10 (1 unit vesica[ in 10 units horizontal (10% slope)} but not steeper than 1:8 (1 unit verticalin 8 units horizontal (13% slope} Steeper than 1: 12 (1 unit vertical in 12 units horizontal ($.3°/a slope)) but not steeper than 7: 10 (1 unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10%slope) 1 } A slope steeper Than 1 :8 (1 unit vertical in 8 units horizontal (1 3% nope} shall not be permitted'. Clear width of ramps: 36 (915 MM) minimum. least as wide as the widest ramp. leading to it. be 60'1 (1525 mm)miW nimum clear. ANSI maximum1bRse 3 in. 75 mm 6 in. 150 mm Landings shall be at Landing length shall :}. SURF,AC� F PAM ■atr■.i..■f+*■i+rt**+l�+#` �i�■!♦i tit -{r ■ + i• ■ +*+{■■ta E++e,f�+■+ar■is i # i �! i ; i r + ■ + aF + • s i- s r ■• a t■■ t �F # i# -# t o # a+ f#+ i rt i■ F# i i i ■ii Ort*■i■ i F i t rtPi•■r#f■■isiaiahili+#y i*frti�iiai■■■fiat+Pt*aria■moi■tisFaa # i # } #.. ! i• a �■ ■, i • r. y P # i i i ■ it i ■i ■ i i s * rt # i .i#+#i# ' # ■ ! t ■ ! ■'. i rt i 1Y + * P # i ■ ■ ■ ■ # ■ ■ • i i i f i # i. + ■• + + # ## rt #e ■ a� + ■ r r rt t r a t ■r ■ r F s b # t . # * ■ f t a 1! • f # i # �F a M: a• ■ rt �. ■ • a ■ ■ + a i .. * .■ ■, a # a i■ f■ t ■. i # i F t 'P �F ■ '■�. i i#■ a ■, a# r F t i i• ■ a■# f i! i• t■ a t a+ rt■■ .■ a rt i rt f i i ,■ i■ i# i �! 4!■ f■ i i i a* $• f i# i` r i, iy} f�iyt •y #_i_F_i_a_ a_• + M*#rtfrt HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OH RUN . - IP #-iF-i "4iIi I� �a#+a*yi art+rt �<<. iInuill V iso Pro slop 1:2)€ 0 760 15 CABUANSI A117.1-1992 Fig_ 84.8.2 Components of a Single Rami Run and Sample Ramp Dimensions 12 min CURB WALL Fig. B4.8.3 53 Example of Clear Width and edge Protection A r -"b w-'% F . X ra RAILING VIIfTHC�P�.Y �". ---- -- 36 thin f 2 min P05 RA(UNG WITH EXTENDED PLATFORM Fig. B4.8-3 Example of Clear Width and Edge Protection (continued) 1l2 max RADIUS WF-Iush Riser i'/z mix 38 1 max RADIUS 1 60 . - .-. . - _ - - ` •tis •+• • _ — " ni?i �•4 i!a + •s re•s !• � rT •• . . _ . s•Yi. � . iral.Pll� xn '1'2 111 C-3 38 DIS 00 1 _.W.i !J `}•i `•i W• !i •`z�is aWs ' +° sWsin +• •i +A. Hounded N' Fig. B4.9,2. 1 Usable Tread Width a:id ExamPIes of Acceptable, Protruding Nosings