HomeMy WebLinkAboutLETTERS - 99-00016 - Bagley Enterprises - New WarehouseApri19,1999
Terry Bagley
423 Yale
Rexburg, ID 83440
Dear Terry
while trying to review your new building plans,, I have identified the following items that
need Baur attention:
1. Use of building is unlu-iawn. The list you provided describes many different
possible uses. If the building is used as a Melaleuca warehouse, the hypes of
materials being stored would need to be identified. Depend"�.� upon. the materials
being stored, a sprinkler system might be required. Another'
suggested use is re -
upholstery and furniture repair. Hous many workers would be involved? The
exiling requirements co��.�d be substantia��y diff�ren� than that of a storage facility.
Another suggested use is that of a building contractor office. Depending upon the
contractor, many office spaces may need to be provided and therefore exiting
issues would. arise. I have reviewed, the building as a Type 11 N with a S- 1
occupancy. Some of the fallowing items carne about from the review, others will
reed to be addressed no matter what the designations..
2. Multi ple use may drive area separation creation. Without floor flan, we cannot
evaluate.
3 _ "i he plot pian does not identify right-of-way. One half of a 99 foot (49..5') xight-
of-way should be identified along all of your property. Y could create the legal
description for you and have St -eve drams up the Quit Claim Deed to transfer
ownership. The Calot plan should identify right-of-way and dive dimensions,.
4. All sheets should be stamped and s�gn�d by an architect or engineer registered in
this state as per 94 UBC Sec. 106.3.2
5. Details on the construction of the firewalls have not been provided..
r�
Apri19,1999
Terry Bagley
423 Yale
Rexburg, ID 83440
Dear Terry
while trying to review your new building plans,, I have identified the following items that
need Baur attention:
1. Use of building is unlu-iawn. The list you provided describes many different
possible uses. If the building is used as a Melaleuca warehouse, the hypes of
materials being stored would need to be identified. Depend"�.� upon. the materials
being stored, a sprinkler system might be required. Another'
suggested use is re -
upholstery and furniture repair. Hous many workers would be involved? The
exiling requirements co��.�d be substantia��y diff�ren� than that of a storage facility.
Another suggested use is that of a building contractor office. Depending upon the
contractor, many office spaces may need to be provided and therefore exiting
issues would. arise. I have reviewed, the building as a Type 11 N with a S- 1
occupancy. Some of the fallowing items carne about from the review, others will
reed to be addressed no matter what the designations..
2. Multi ple use may drive area separation creation. Without floor flan, we cannot
evaluate.
3 _ "i he plot pian does not identify right-of-way. One half of a 99 foot (49..5') xight-
of-way should be identified along all of your property. Y could create the legal
description for you and have St -eve drams up the Quit Claim Deed to transfer
ownership. The Calot plan should identify right-of-way and dive dimensions,.
4. All sheets should be stamped and s�gn�d by an architect or engineer registered in
this state as per 94 UBC Sec. 106.3.2
5. Details on the construction of the firewalls have not been provided..
An automatic sprinkler system will have to be installed unless openings are
provided ever 50 feet on �� �)yall that 11 not in
Qf t UnflU
opposite parallel wall per 94 UBC Sec -904.2.2. The details provided do not
provide the necessary openings in the front wall. The openings must be 20 feet
square mi�mum and at feast 30 inches wide.
7. Glazed glass is required as per 94 UBC Sec. 2406.3 and Sec. 2406.4. No details
are provided that identify need.
8. Electfical plans are not provided. Can't have State Electrical Inspector review
without some plan.
-9. Mechanical and plumbing plans not provided. Nothing four plumb�ng inspector to
review. Ventilation not addressed.
10. Floor plan is not provided. Letter froji-i Terry Bagley speaks of bath -rooms. I
ca��'t review accessibility requirements as per ANSI 117. 1
.
It. Interior wall details will be needed if building is to be Type, U.N.
12. Access for the disabled not addressed in parking,,
�3. Details do not shaver interior materials. Insulation not shown. Flame spread can
not be addressed Without interior details.
14. Many more items will surface as details are Provided.
As you can see, these are too many unresolved issues dor a plan review. Please address
these items and I will immediately continue the review. Thank you for your cansideratian ija
these matters.
Sinecrely,
Val Christensen
Assistant Engineer