Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCITY RESPONSE LETTER - 154 Rosewood - CUP for non-family housing for 4 studentse upo g v A y a A ��4eC#SHEO, BRUCE SUTHERLAND ROSE BAGLEY fl(RR RICHARD HORNER MF UKR 6FIRMC IOFFUR Lynn Hossner 109 North.Second West St. Anthony, Idaho 83445 STATE OF IDAHO August 28, 2001 Re: Jeanine Dennett Property Dear Mr. Hossner: P.O. BOX 280 12 NORTH CENTER STREET REXBURG, IDAHO 83440 PHONE (208) 359-3020 FAX (208) 359-3022 I am in receipt of your letter dated today, and I will address your concerns as best I can. First of all, I am not in the habit of reading the newspaper, but I can assure you, that no permit to allow Ms. Dennett to rent to college students was issued, nor do I foresee any permit being issued given the geographical and structural deficiencies of Ms. Dennett's property to accommodate a duplex. As to what the restrictive covenants may or may not state, I must inform you on behalf of the City, that they have no bearing whatsoever on this issue. The City's ordinance is the governing document from the City's perspective, and the restrictive covenants serve only to add additional restrictions, not to remove the restrictions placed upon the property by ordinance. With respect to the parking question, it is not, as you state, a question of whether the tenants Ms. Dennett currently anticipates will have cars, it is whether Ms. Dennett can comply with the current Planning and Zoning requirements. As was indicated in the public hearing, the City staff has researched the issue exhaustively, and can find no reasonable way in which Ms. Dennett can obtain the necessary parking legally. Furthermore, she is already in violation of current P & Z ordinances with respect to front yard coverage. The minimum parking stall size in the City of Rexburg is 9' in width, which would preclude the use of the 8'6" driveway, and any parking plan of 4 or more requires two way access, which would again preclude the use of the driveway to access parking in the back. Ms. Dennett was given copies of all of the relevant sections of the City Ordinance, and should be able to make the same available to you. A complete copy of the Ordinance is available at City Hall for review or purchase for $10.00. Lastly, in order for any lot in the City of Rexburg to be approved for a duplex, it must have a minimum of 10,000 square feet. As Ms. Dennett's lot does not, it could not, and will not ever under the current Planning and Zoning Ordinance be considered for a duplex or multiple unit rentals. In conclusion, if Ms. Dennett had been forthright with the City at the beginning of the building process, she would have known of the deficiencies of her plan from the outset, and would not have invested in improvements that might never be able to be used in their intended manner. I would be happy to discuss this matter with you further if you should have questions, however, the most simple principles of zoning have been applied, and complied with in arriving at this decision, and I don't see any means by which Ms. Dennett could prevail on questioning the Cities decision. Sincerely, .. ���' Stephen P. Zollinger " Rexburg City Attorney cc: Jeanine Dennett File