Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORSGREN MULT DOCS - 03-00028 - Deseret Industries - New CommercialVi 'LS U L } � V R Q V - Q O pe r O •p G O G y v U U2 UO Faz _a Z � 0 `o L � F � N a 3 El Er: c m m N h 35 N m Q a C 0 e O o3 61 ad « O F O ❑ �+ o a0, d O 9 9 •a z o v c4 U U L d y y u m F ;z"r u a U E " U w Z d d ''1' „� �• M vMi vMi u d d F .Lax � U ❑ a A 4 � o � � Vi 'LS U L } � V R E a E Q C6 �s w Y L E Faz _a Z � 0 `o L � F � N a 3 El Er: c m m N h 35 N O 3 a C 0 e O w G O F O ❑ �+ o a0, d O 9 9 •a z � � r U Q v u m F Y OR •y R ••i N u a U E " E � u w Q �s w d w O O Z � 0 Z 3 El Er: u w G 4 d O u Y � v o U �❑ F ❑ �+ FL. � � w Q W y wG � Z Y OR •y R ••i N U E " U w ''1' „� �• M vMi vMi o F � U ❑ ❑ � v A 4 � o � � CC"o x Ha tn �o o ^o m a O CL ..❑ a we � F E m�❑� ❑'� .o e v a W LL W W O A v nq O O Q❑ K R p O Z t F O O o z z .Z. F o o vw .z. F G •� :o o W X v p w w 0 0 0 0 F _E o U A$ 0 0 0 0 po w0 q `" ❑ V F � � O U `o .aa � E .7 N M of Vl e n s❑� �' o .. o G'� a❑ � 0 z � o 0 0 a a a a .. .. U U U U c� d y ..� 9 'o W ❑, � 'o u a, N x 0.1 c aLi d u N # Pla!3 E ZZ W L7 o 146N iz N v u7 � 9C, w Z d m U U L z v ` FE 3 v v G o� o W o 0 o 0 L v a Fz❑� ❑ N z ao x3Q�c � O � El O u /. � " W ❑' w� E E z v c 0 z C U W E i4 v 6 N y rdn u u v •�+ m �a 'o a Fa z' •• � w 4 ZZ W L7 o 146N iz Q '^ w o � w 5 op n 0 V w❑ N W � W ZLi U ❑COD N w w G ze w Z d z 8 z 3 ` FE 3 v v G o� a 3 f o � o 0 L v a Fz❑� ❑ z U Q � O � El O u /. .o 'o W ❑' w� c v y C U W E i4 F3 N y rdn u .Z. �'w'' Fa z' •• � w LL WF d ^ ❑ O U /O� U w 2 V O ) U a O c N n m C z o mAM o u� N Q o + ❑ 0 o d c 9 v 0 a; e U 2 z .v. E E rD W R U 0 a Q '^ w o � w 5 op n 0 V w❑ N W � W ZLi U ❑COD N w w G ze I d z 8 � 3 ` FE 3 v v `v o� a 3 f o � o C r O L v rA a O w w G ze I El z 8 � awl � ••� LL FE `oDo�[Oa `v C r O L v rA Fz❑� � O El O u /. .o 'o W ❑' w� c v y C U W E i4 F3 a � •0 0 0 0 .0� � O N o L d C N ml m Q NI � v U v C w � v 3 d ❑ Em ao��Ao w ° p 94 U G 3 d �❑ z E] QF 7 y O ? Z 9 3R g E u v N U E 3 f Z uCCU W o o❑� u a pL a U ❑ ❑ o �. Q Non o. s❑ to) sc I-M W m a E N O v! .� a z M o❑o El30Q Q� '(�� c u Q .. 0 O. .L' W❑ ti VJ L R'' /yi o w w o c d c` M W CO N o =I K❑ �^ Q L C F O a U a � C) W o Z NaV C E2 N z OU F z❑m V O o W? V O M O C O D FD F .� A z 3 a Vbp❑aowda y {-J s ''� Op a' _m z a C w 9C] vi d � •w «� O � W � c E, F3 � •0 0 0 0 .0� � O N o L d C N ml m Q ti e 0 u a c a, u w a 2 El a 0 w O El I Y y 0.1 Z 0 'c a 'in oo w n env Q v 3 vMi ❑ f -o 8 3 w❑ E 3 u b d a w � d 30 ❑ o 8 U ❑ ❑ � X X P G X X X X o T � G In U Q O Q Q $ ❑ o aw Q �i ..❑ Q FSI F ❑ LL O N p J M y❑- W Wd 7 ^� 8 k z.d O os a; G'L.N W Q F Fo,c O a Qa ❑ o F z 0 o a ;; erm o F ❑ u a �O M � a k e o 0 L a acW�za�a� i C ` ❑ m 0 Ow �.w a aw d U wee° �3 U U Y y 0.1 'c a 'in oo M n env Q v tai vMi -o 0 E M N b X X X X X X X C N T � U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q o O o O y Q Q Q Q Qa 000a 0 0 0 U U U U G y A Q n N N Q # Pla!3 V o UI 0 4 w w Z w G a El G Q Z 0 0 El gG Z U N Q z w � � w o � w S 00 0 w ❑ c n 0 Za) oz E w0 uo ❑ c m ❑ G0 v _ T c o O f � O � Q w N u v 00 7 �z❑'p O N YZ ❑.0 N V p U u Y N b t� � U aLi •oa v � � aoi Eo s w 0 m O M o oy Z d � 0 LL Q w 0 w . z z a K x Coo �wA x H o d T N W v o U �Z rz H3 v z p N v ai V •� a fl Pr UI 0 4 w w Z w G a El G Q Z 0 0 El gG Z U N Q z w � � w o � w S 00 0 w ❑ c n 0 Za) oz E w0 uo ❑ c m ❑ G0 Oj S v w T c 0 O f � O � w w w sG 00 7 �z❑'p O zC YZ ❑.0 N N a p U u Y N oz❑ t� ❑ LL 0 E 0. El /. 0o w 0 R O M o Z d � = LL Q w 0 w . z z a Oj S v w T c f � O � T w w = 0 �z❑'p O o z 6 i W V ti F a p N U b ❑ oz❑ Goa Q d � L.�y FZq LL Q t/i EV1 N K x k x x H L L d T N W E n U v v H3 v Oj S w H ¢ w w = 0 6 i r M N Y� N K x k x x x K T � U v v o v V fl u N N N N d L � a _ n] E M M M M z o 0 0 0 U U U U T bD r N N x d A Oj S B N 3 0 a w d u W a IS a w 2 Z w i El i ❑ El i rA CA U d W as 0 �! w C 3 � w q 0 Na �°' vv t ,Mi, M vMi ❑ ° 3 e �❑ 3 x � a d ao � oo ao 3 ❑ o 8 U x x ❑ ❑ x x ppm U o a v v G zM�0 O V V ❑ LL O O Q[ L y= 7 O a O V O 7 O Q •d b rl b H � rl b rl •� u O O. U y"',. Ca W ll Cii7 T v O yO v O L P W t0 N ❑ N F z0 W O N V ElF o S Q� ❑ 4 4 ui L d U d U U C y C L N ,0 % T A � N tz x e3 # Pla!3 F i rA CA U d as q 0 Na �°' vv t ,Mi, M vMi Ha d ao � oo ao N x x x x x x x U v a v v o O O L y= 7 O a O V O 7 O Q •d b rl b H � rl b rl av O v O a O v O L t0 N N N E az N 4 4 U U U U C y T A � N N x # Pla!3 lz Le M. -. Q = s _ Q O V w 3 O O Q O � L9 � i d ❑ ❑ • U L � u d 0 ❑ ❑ a G �U ❑ •EJ' LV°i � G L L U V o a U F W is to M r Z❑� a E o a o U o ate' a U :N L d O C E �zr m v oL O C 0 z O x x d •� a x vdd ;odd p0 L a V L p b O W � E 3 a w w ❑ lz Le M. A O 0 Q W z w Z w 3 O O Q 3 L9 � i d ❑ ❑ T G aw W w `" Z z a < g 3 0 0 ❑ ❑ a G ❑ Q' O K o-zi G L L U V o a U F W is to M r Z❑� a E o U o e a M :N F MO v C z w L u oL O C 0 Z i x x x w a � x vdd ;odd p0 Yzz V L p b O W � E 3 Fa w w ❑ AF;oo z �, d 0 oz 0 0 d d v= e 0 •a 0 �U a 0 z mNr F❑ 0 vo 0 0 Ly O •p 9 L c �wz z a a d Y E s eD U F 5 a � z A O 0 Q c W El m �d v Q z w � T G w 3 O O Q 3 ❑f °u � i d ❑ ❑ T L w �W�yy G� aw W w `" Z z a < g 3 0 u w 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ G Q c W El m �d v w o G o L F Pa Q Pa 0.l ❑ a w LL °�aDo 0 Q' O K o-zi G L L E F o a U F W is to M r Z❑� o U A a N ti M :N F MO v �o❑�G�a w L u oL O C 0 Z i x x x x x x vdd ;odd p0 w V c a u b V W � E 3 F Q c W El m �d v L F Pa Q Pa 0.l o M F a M M r v ti :N .�. x x x x x x x T V b b v b AF;oo 0 0 0 d v= e 0 •a 0 v 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 L a a a � z o 0 0 0 U U U U c y ' T bOD Q � N N x 3 I r Ll 11 n a; O El W µrd a U 0 o o g 10 O � U L N L a d a p N « a O o Na O E A 0 Ha M h ❑ w T L j w v q 3 ti v C4 0 3 ❑ ZO � 0 0 U k ❑ ❑ x L u o k G A z v r 8 z 0 z o v C Y 0❑ o 0 0 V L � i ❑ LL F a ❑ p El a aw 0 0 I r Ll 11 n a; O El W µrd a U 0 O v O � w s T 'O c o 0 3 O ❑� O 0 Ha M a0 ❑ w T L j w N N ti .l Vi ti 3 ❑ ZO � 0 0 U k ❑ ❑ x k k k G 8 z o C Y 0❑ o 0 0 i ❑ LL F a ❑ p El �o aw 0 0 u W w O �Uwr 0 0 a 0 zQ v�zG; w v CG o 0 E3 U V F F O L LL zEl c a M a a U FSI ❑ ¢ � o « o 0 z o 0 0 0 U U U U N T pp n N N E 3 A Q H O v O O O Ha M N N ti .l Vi ti C N k k k k k k k T � o 0 0 i 0 0 0 o 0 0 a 0 v CG o 0 0 0 L a a 0 z o 0 0 0 U U U U N T pp n N N x A Q III a z � O U O ems'- e e E V � N V o0 y � w O o yb o _ r « O N o s G O s J O u O O y u> M O U O G c � o � a w Z a w 0 0 u 4 0 O O 0 V o po N O [j 'oFF Y Y x Q�suap 6�Q i N � G is Vl N O b O y < b o 3 00 A rq � o •- Y„ U O V o y �zo0 sb�oa N •N J z N A p i N A 'd N w o OLn a z � O U O ems'- e e E V � N V o0 y � w O yb o _ r « O o O u O O y Q Z a w 0 0 n O O O V o CN N O [) a z � O U O ems'- e e E V � N V o0 y � w a z O r O o _ r « O o O u O O y Q Z 0 0 n O O O O O o CN N O [) Q�suap 6�Q � _ / / § 0 � ƒ .§§;a§a �■;_z /5u%2�, 0 27 �E o� a0 J 0,L .i 2J(. �. z: 75 co =m -eq '0B�4 °ƒ4!a l0�c46 cA�§§@. e0z�§ a \ // 2 % \ 2 / o ) _0 i )¥o 7 = \ 2)%2 \§/ ) co k001 <LL(Lw 0 � ƒ .§§;a§a �■;_z /5u%2�, 0 27 �E o� a0 J 0,L .i 2J(. �. z: 75 co =m -eq '0B�4 °ƒ4!a l0�c46 cA�§§@. e0z�§ a \ // 2 % \ 2 \ ... <± C5 }° » y � � U / ■ \ 7 $ �$ 2� R � \%�,. cu > R >1 . : k§(1) �$Si 2w \ x Ofom e \ § \ § / 22��k /mu g20 § ||§) ��at N4|§ u |k| ee! |fi| 2 U '9El )|i! . .|.�. / !|(. ® 4 \| |!!K § ||§) �. N4|§ 4$|n |fi| 2 !�k». )|i! 2 .|.�. / !|(. -g ! t j §�|e (n § IR : �. § ( � � 2 § § LD 2 / 4 ) j (n �� )� &@f §\E kk / (D! c2 )w )/$ : \ / e )\ / tk k \c CMm \ $§o§ <U- CLX : / IL 11 a to in co to /22$u g k SEL 0 LEE /§! \/E ■ ; Cl) L) �%�§;LD ;see@§ m°2§!R §/SEE �0 o k § ` $; E 2 - \ ) ) \ ƒ § ] / IL : � � \ \ ■ � � u k )©!!!!± i ƒf!§/ \§( - )§f 2!k&; |1088 !|ee Nkk§§ Ni|n! |ik!§ )fiMm )|i!! ��\\ §||n§ : � � \ \ ■ � � \ & u k \§( ui )§f \ & LL O F Z w Q: H LU (n N N y � w o. w r IL 0: 2 Z O U uOi n CCa T L N 0 U) U 00 D ^IN co r N Cl) u 5 u p m v p u C w ty 0 L)0 a Iy: Q m M CD 5 O � ,0^ V 0 U) : E P: d E ~ a E Cl) V to 4 d tEi08 m m COx XW D Z r : N d 7 m w` 7 w U) b a D 0 m '— > 0 ds 0 C LD y a E z O U W a Z N () .Z E ~ 3 Lu w T ~ yy7 w Z Q ..1 � w V N m t7 b tEi08 z O U W a Z N () .Z E ~ 3 Lu w T ~ yy7 w Z Q ..1 � w V N m \ .� ) ) § § ) 0 )\ k / k2 � 0) ��8 k \\ ) <LL(Lw q � ■ � ƒ �§k§2§m @)u2E 2m■;�s _$ e ,mo c @ o o 2°$ au!� oA§0 °Z�I ! |�■»!I� a | !!k|| !|§§k k4|§§ mi|nn |fI|| |fime )|I■■ ee §||■# k 2 � S � \ ■ \ [ 7-1 ; 2 U) >§ 2W wIL ILw /k �2 N \ .A \ x � Idw ) ƒ La 0 _In ,'o§ -o 1 § § U) U) a§ /2 2E �w _Q k\ )w \ 2®■!!�� k3:o27- � \ 2!k|§ ƒ §uX §«} §4|§§ N$|nn \\\ )fI|§ |�k■■ , °�) ||Im! ,) % ! � §||§w E Z3 2°6 / \ a0 E 0k o 5, cu o cu \ a) �0 )\\ \ §. � k\ § U) U) a§ /2 2E �w _Q k\ )w \ 2®■!!�� \ 2!k|§ ƒ !|�§§ B` §«} §4|§§ N$|nn \\\ )fI|§ |�k■■ , °�) ||Im! ,) !! ! � §||§w E Z3 § U) U) a§ /2 2E �w _Q k\ )w \ \ ƒ . §«} \\\ r , °�) b ! � E Z3 / \ ) E 0k @f cu cu \ a) )\\ \ \ § \ / a7 2 0 2 k\$/ o 82) k {co o) <U- CL± / § rep ) IL ( C4 k, , � //1 fƒ\!f § \ !!\&; ||/k) §4|§§ \ ;|0 °o;22t L ) )fi§§ /§� )�k@@ @ \ \\\ �) )/A ®2�!/ƒ & `A|Nn fƒ\!f § \ !!\&; ||/k) §4|§§ \ §i|m! ) )fi§§ )�k@@ )|k@@ \\\ �) Ee k § � \ \ ) \\\ 2 \ / \ j k B } \\ *cam \c \ )\\ \ L - |§B)kk©1 ) !| {ƒI\9 K ,n o 7 e , ` ƒ7 g « +i|nm k o _ \LO E )|f@! § \ o \j / ) k00 ! 4) E , <LLa± a |§B)kk©1 ) !| {ƒI\9 K 2!k|| e�r )!,§e !|ee §4|§§ +i|nm )ff§N )fk!! )|f@! �| t! ! as §||Mn k W \ 4 Z kE /§ CLL) \ \ � \ e ■ L / { § § ) 0 )\ o tf2 2 cc two 3 /A§� k {o k <LLa2 ci � 2 / t cl 77 §2£ 2!k| ||§k 2 §4|§ « 2 |f7| CL co / �5W§ E .|■ M§§k co @2227 ƒƒI\ |!!§ § 2!k| ||§k §M_ §4|§ #i|n |f7| |fk! �5W§ .|■ M§§k §||§ o!,§§® ��! we � 7®!!!! ƒƒI\ |!!§ § 2!k| ||§k §4|§ #i|n |f7| |fk! ||im .|■ §||§ U) E 1E § L) \ \ /2 E �w 5L) \k )w \ \ / c a \ \ §()gym® � o e ca 7 § §k \� !§§ \ ] / 22 c j /tea f .0D �m 00 a) ƒ ||I@ .)■ §()gym® Iƒt! !!}§ !§§ 44|§ E u .0D �m ilM \ ||I@ .)■ D 0 �R2r j o § Llm k . |k2 a0 ! u Ge. �p/ � kku2JJ k2 §■» � s au) o 2 �CL — �0 U) u §o - E #cZ F- \\ !| Iƒt! !!}§ !§§ 44|§ Ni|n ){i§ ilM \ ||I@ .)■ D j a § Llm k . � / § \ D j E� N� C: 0)cc k . � \\\ }\/ / /A Z y G � LL N a {j. W W a >_ U) N U a ~ 2 O U O O J M� sd+ � fi ri rn E a = O N U in d' d � 9 - q LL J q � C a' N � 2 N aci da ad az U ` u m O q O L J x J J E _ N m t a c LL x '- E � N c d c a J - a3 0 8 � 4 y LL LL y r m N m N a H N Tf C � W a o 0 o x v � d z o rc � Ia0 10 N v E `d N N N LL N O ] q d O ak V M� sd+ � I y!! \ , \» §{\\ )k/ in i d ` � O 4 �a m .3 LL J N d ^ Q ^ NQ Z N c 24 a v az U ` u m o N 0 L ` V rnq rd J S J J E _ N � C d C ax• - N� 6 J-. a g o 0 N LL LL « 16 � L Q N N F d N Q w v 5 w c o d d u v 0 N M V y E d N N N ya LL E Na v 2 m a � u � U REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT DI Client JRW Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger Weather Sunny cool breezy Finish Sub Grade LOCATION KEY BF Backfill BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing ST Street RT Retest SD SL TR WL WTL PL Storm Drain Sewerline Trench Wall Waterline Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOC/A TES / /NC. Date 10/14/03 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST TEST LOCATION % COM NO. DEPTH ELEV. % SOIL SPEC FIELD DI +FSG PL MOISTTYPE '95.0 '46 10/13 1 4" 700 ' S off N7th center line, 520' W off E2nd W curb. 4'+FSG 6A r128.5PR PR 10/13 10/13 2 4" 680 S off N7th center line, 530' W off E2nd W curb. 1'6"+FSG 3.5 SPR 95.0 .1'' 96.3 3 - 4" 630 ' S off N7th center line, 530' W off E2nd W curb 1'6"+FSG 4.9 SPR 95 0 97.5 10/13 4 4" 580 S off N7th center line, 530' W off E2nd W curb. 1'6"+FSG 5.9 PR 95.0 95.3 10/13 5 4" 650 'S off N7th center line, 470' W off E2nd W curb. 3'6"+FSG 5.8 130.3 123.1 SPR 95.0 97.0 10/13 6 4" 600 ' S off N7th center line, 470' W off E2nd W curb. 3'6"+FSG 5.2 129.0 122.6 SPR 95.0 96.7 10/13 7 4" 550 ' S off N7th center line, 470' W off E2nd W curb. 3'6"+FSG 3.7 129.5 124.8 SPR 95.0 98.4 10/13 8 4" 500 ' S off N7th center line, 470' W off E2nd W curb. 3'6"'+FSG 6.8 134.8 126.2 SPR 95.0 99.5 10/13 9 4" 450 ' S off N7th center line, 470' W off E2nd W curb. 3'6"+FSG 7.7 137.0 '127.2 SPR 95.0 99+' 10/13 10 4" 350 S off N7th center line 330 W off E2nd W curb 2'+FSG 6.8 131.5 123.2 SPR 95.0 97.0 10/13 z `;rar x, .. c REMARKS: Established a rolling pattern with Zollingers rollers as 12 passes. Elevations modified to reftlect actual height. Tests referd to elevation FSG are outside of BP. Any compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. Technician Dustin Passey JVIL IYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY Zo�lli*nger Pit run 9.1 p Pn1I�Rhaer t$rs,,&Ha�3``Ju: sandy= SPR 26.8 Reviewed by REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT DI Client JRW Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger Weather Cloudy breezy cool Finish Sub Grade LOCATION KEY BF Backfill BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing ST Street RT Retest SO Storm Drain SL Sewerline TR Trench WL Wall WTL Waterline PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/INC. Date 10/15/03 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST TEST LOCATION SOIL % COM N0. DEPTH ELEV. % DENSITY WET DRY SPEC FIELD DI +FSG PL MOIST TYPE SPR 95.0 98.6 10/15 13 4" 580 ' S off N7th center line, 570' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 4.7 - 130.0 125.1 10/15 10/15 14 4" 530 ' S off N7th center line, 570' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 4.5 127.3 121.8 SPR 95.0 96.0 10/15 15 4' 480 ' S off N7th center line, 570' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 4.7 130.2 124.4 SPR 95.0 98.1 10/15 16 4" 430 ' S off N7th center line, 570' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 4.7 127.6 121.9 SPR 95.0 96.1 10/15 17 4" 580 ' S off N7111 centerline, 570' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 5.4I 129.4 -122.9 SPR 95.0 96.8 18 4' 680 ' S off N7th center line, 620' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 5.7 135.3 128.0 PR 95.0 10/15 19 4" 630 ' S off N7th center line, 620' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 4,0 133:6 128.4 PIR 94.9 10/15 20 4" 580 ' S off N7th center line, 620' W off F2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 5.6 137.0 129.7 PR 95.0 95:2 10/15 21 4" 530 ' S off N7th center line, "620' W off E2nd W curb.. _2'+FSG 6.8 139.4 PR 95.0 96.1 10/15 22 4 680 ' S off N71h center line, 670' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 8.0 136.1 .130.5. 126.0 SPR 95.0 96.7 10/15 23 4' x320 ' S off N7th center line, 300' W off E2nd. W. curb. 2'+FSG 4.7 132.0 .126.0 SPR 95.0 ,95.0 99.3 .99.3 REMARKS: Established a rolling pattern with Zollingers rollers as 12 passes. Elevations modified to reftlect actual height. Tests referd to elevation FSG are outside of BP. Any compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. linger Pit run 9.1 run PIR .. ndv = SPR Passey Reviewed by REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT DI Client JRW Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger Weather Sunny cool Finish Sub Base LOCATION KEY BF Backfill BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing ST Street RT Retest SO Storm Drain SL Sewerline TR Trench WL Wall WTL Waterline PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Date 10/15/03 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor LOCATION N0. DEPTH ELEV. % DENSITY SOIL % COM DI +FSG PL MOIST WET DRY TYP SPEC FIELI 10/15 10/15 1 4" - 680. '. S off N7th center line, 2 520' W off E2nd. W curb, 2'+FSG' 6.5' 136.5 '96.0 10/15 4' 630 ' S off N7th center line, 520' W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 128.1 PR 95.0 3 4' 580 ' S off N7th center line, 520' W off E2nd W 2'+FSG 5.2 130.8 124.3 SPR 95.0 98.0 10/15 44 530 ' S off N7th center line, 520' curb. W off E2nd W 6.2 128.5 121.1 SPR 95.0 95.4 10/15 5 4" 480' ' S off N7th center line, 520' curb W off E2nd W curb. 2'+FSG 2'+FSG 7.5 138.0 128.4 PR 95.0 95.2 10/15 ` 6 4 480 S off N7th center line, 570' W off E2nd W 6.1 134.3 126.5 SPR 95.0 99.8 10/15 7 4" 530 S off N7th center line, 570' curb W off E2nd W 1'6"+FSG 6.1 127.5 120.1 SPR 95.0 94.7 10/15 8 4" 580 S off N7th center line, 570 curb. W off E2nd W 1'6"+FSG 6.2 128.5 121.0 SPR 95.0 '95.4 10/15 9 4" 630 ' S off N7th center line, 570' curb W off E2nd W 1'6"+FSG 6.2 130.9 123.2 SPR 95.0 97.2 10/15 10 4" 650 ' S off N7th center line, 620' curb. W off E2nd W 1'6"+FSG 7.5 132.4 123.2 SPR 95.0 97.1 10/15 11 4" 670 r�ff N71h center line, curb 1'6"+FSG 6.4 137.4 129.0 PR 95.0 95.7 10/15 12 4" 620 ' S off N7th center line, 520' 500' W off E2nd W curb. 1'6"+FSG SPR .95.0 98.5 W off E2nd W curb. 1'+FSG SPR 95.0 98.5 REMARKS: Established a rolling pattern with Zollingers rollers as 12 passes. Elevations modified to reftlect actual height. soli TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Tests referd to elevation FSG are outside of BP. Zollinger pit run 9,1 Any compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. 8 OMA _- - � „.. sandy = SPR 126.8 Technician Dustin Passey Reviewed by FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/INC. Date REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS Project 01-02-0136 0001 BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD FSB PROJECT DI FSG Finish Sub Grade Client JRW Finish Floor FG Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger 1 95% 96.2% Weather Sunny 2 BS LOCATION KEY A BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/INC. Date 5-17-04 1 of 2 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL % WET DRY TYPE SPEC COM FIELD 5-17 1 BS 10' from NW corner of building gooing W FG A 1 95% 96.2% 5-17 2 BS 20' from test #1 going W A 95% 96.8% 5.17 3 SS - 20' from lest #2 going W A 95% 96.9% 5-17 4 BS 10' from test #3 going N. A 95% 95.9% 5-17 5 BS 45' from NW corner of building going N. KFG A 95% 95.7% 5-17 6 BS 10' from lest #5 going N. A 95% 95.9% 5'17 7 BS 15' from test # 6 going N. A 95% 96.7% 5.17 8 BS 24' from test 47 going E. A 95% 96.2% 5-17 9 BS 20' from test # 8 going E,FG A 95% 97.4% 5-17 10 BS 43' from NW corner of building going N. FG A 95% 95.9% 517 11 BS 77' from NE corner of building going N. FG A 95% 97.3% 517 12 BS 50' from test# 11 going W. FG A 95% 98.9% REMARKS: asphalt temp 289' ai temp 60' SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY asphalt tg7.6 Technician K Yerger Reviewed by��� DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % DENSITY MOIST WET DRY SOIL % TYPE SPEC COM FIELD BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD 13 FORSGREN PROJECT DI A 95% ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW jDEPTH 32'from test #13 going N FG Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger 96.3% Date 5-17 2of 2 Weather Sunny 35' from test #14 going N FG Project 01-02-01360001 95% LOCATION KEY 5-17 16 BF Backfill SO Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Fooling WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. LOCATION ELEV. % DENSITY MOIST WET DRY SOIL % TYPE SPEC COM FIELD 5-17 13 31' from SE corner of building going E. FG A 95% 95.1% 5-17 14 jDEPTH 32'from test #13 going N FG A 95% 96.3% 5-17 15 35' from test #14 going N FG A 95% 95.9% 5-17 16 35' from lest #15 going N FG A 95% 95.3% 5-17 17 23' from test #16 going N FG A 95% 95.1% 5-17 18 BS 40' from test #17 going N FG A 95% 95.2% 5-17 19 BS 25' from lest #18 going N FG A 95% 96.1% 5-17 20BS 24' from test #19 going N FG A 95% 96.5% 5-17 21 8S 30' from test #20 going N FG A 95% 95.0% 5-17 22 BS 40 from corner of building going E FG A 95% 96.1% 5-17 23 BS 30' from test #22 going E FG A 95% 199.3% 5-17 24 BS 20 from test #23 going E,, FG A 95% 197.8% REMARKS: All s '"e?ae#''�kdr SOILTYPE OPT.MOISTURE MAXDRYOENSITY asphalt 141.8 Technician K Yerger Reviewed by DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % DENSITY MOIST WET DRY SOIL % TYPE SPEC COMP FIELD BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD 1 FORSGREN PROJECT DI A 1 95% ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW BS 16' from test #1 going E FG Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger 199.3% Date 5-18-04 Weather overcast/windy 20' from test #2 going E FG Project 01-02-01360001 A 1 95% LOCATION KEY 5/18 4 BS BF Backfill SO Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % DENSITY MOIST WET DRY SOIL % TYPE SPEC COMP FIELD 5/18 1 BS 102' from SE corner of building going E FG A 1 95% 197.8% 5/18 2 BS 16' from test #1 going E FG A 1 95% 199.3% 5/18 3 BS 20' from test #2 going E FG A 1 95% 198.9% 5/18 4 BS 35' from test #3 going E FG A 95% 95.0% f y .i.. -`t~' -s H{`:e -s.- _ .. . �nY eihto- � &-. �ur# REMARKS:j one 4X10 was removed due to no compaction/ crew could not continue paving due to weather SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY asphalt 141.8 Technician K Yerger Reviewed by /. DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD % COMP _FORSGREN PROJECT DI Rexburg FIELD 3/18 _ ASSOCIATES/INC. Client LDS Church/JRW @FSB 4.4 % Contractor Jacobsen 2 950 Date 3/18/04 and 3/19/04 Weather Cold 8' Project 01-02-0136 0001 4.1% LOCATION KEY 123.4 2 95.0 BE Backfill SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. I TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE % COMP WET DRY SPECT FIELD 3/18 1 8" 55' W. TBC 2nd East 20' N of S. Prop. Ln: SD TR BE @FSB 4.4 % 122.5 117.3 2 950 93.3% 3/19 1RT 8' FSB -8" 4.1% 128.5 123.4 2 95.0 98.1% 3/18 2 6" 105' W. TBC 2nd East 20' N of S. Prop. Ln'. SD TR BE @FSB 42% 134.2 128.8 1 95.0 988% 3/18 3 6" 155' W. TBC 2nd East 20' -N of S Prop. Ln: SD TR BE FSB -24". 3.6% 122.6 118.3 2 95.0 94.1% .. 3/19 3RT 8" FSB -24" 4.8% 125.3 119.6 2 950 95.0% 3/18 4 F. W of 1 -line Is_ M; ,. 37' S of J -line: SD TR BE @FSB "5.5% 120.8 114.5 2 95 0 ..81;0%. 3/19 4RT 8" FSB -8" 4.1% 129.6 124.5 2 950 99.0% 3/18 5 6" 20' W of i line �2 37" S of J line: SD TR BE FSB -18" 4.5% 130.4 124.6 2 95.0 95.8% 3/18 6 8" 25' W of 2nd E. St. TBC 5' S of C -line: SD TR BF @FSB 66% 122.8 115.2 2 95.0 91.6% 3/19 6RT 8" @FSB 8.1% 129.9 120.2 2 950 95.5% . 3/18 7 8" 25' W of 2nd E. St. TBC 0' S of E -line: SD TR BF @FSB 7,8% 124.6 115.6 2 95.0 91.9% ,3/19 7RT 8"' FSB -8" 7.2% 131.8 122.9 2 950 97.7% Failing tests were caused by testing too shallow among the sheepsfoot imprints. Contractor dug down for retests. Results of at least 94.5% of Proctor Density are Tester J. Martineau TYPE 03-054 Reviewed by MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY 4.4 130,3 4.4 125.8 i REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS 5-19-2004 1 of 2 Project BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD Finish Base PROJECT DI Finish Sub Base FSG Client JRW FF Finish Floor contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger A 95% Weather sunny/windy 5-19 2 LOCATION KEY 50' from test #1 going E FG BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Dale 5-19-2004 1 of 2 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL % WET DRY TYPE SPEC COM FIELD 5-19 1 BS 50' from Be corner of building going E FG A 95% 98.1% 5-19 2 BS 50' from test #1 going E FG A 95% 99.3% 5-19 3 BS 20' from test #2 going E FG A 95% 98.3% 5-19 4 BS 15' from test #3 going N FG A 95% 98.8% 5-19 5 BS 30' from lest #4 going W FG A 95% 96.0% 5-19 6 BS 24' from test #5 going N FG A 95% 98.9% 5-19 7 BS 15' from test #6 going N FG A 95% 95.0% 5-19 8 BS 50' from lest #7 going W FG I A 1 95% 196.1% 5-19 9 BS 26' from test #8 going W FG A 95% 95.0% 5-19 10 BS 27' from test #9 going W FG A 95% 198.4% 5-19 11 BS 25' from test #10 going N FG I A 95% 198.9% 5-19 12 BS 25' from test #11 going N FG A 95% 197.6% �' .i .. Sem•.-'n.``9i_ .. x rr.lax � �✓""„ G.fts r. -45;x'.3 is`Z #F Y ` ., y �q, ''rM '%f i'"i'a, 1..,E .tn U, e= REMARKS: asphalt temp 297' air temp 41' SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY asphalt 141.8 Technician K Yerger Reviewed by� J:��f r� FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Date 5-7 / 5-10 1of2 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS Finish Grade FB BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD FSB Finish Sub Base PROJECT DI FF Finish Floor Client JRW FG 2.9 Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger . 2 95.0 Weather sunny/warm/windy 2 6" 75' from test #1goir W. LOCATION KEY 3.1 124.1 BF Backfill SO Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot r� FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Date 5-7 / 5-10 1of2 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST I DENSITY WET DRY SOIL % TYPE SPEC COM FIELD 5-7 1 6" 191' from NE corner of building going E FG 2.9 120.6 117.2 2 95.0 96.6 5-7 2 6" 75' from test #1goir W. FG 3.1 124.1 120.3 2 95.0 99.2 5-7 3 6" 75' from test #2goir W. FG 5.2 130.1 124.9 1 95.0 95.8 5-7 4 6" 52' from N.E Corner of building going N FG 4.7 130.4 125.7 2 95.0 96.4 5-10 6 6" 50' from test #4 Going W FG 4.5 131.5 125.9 1 95.0 96.6 5-10 7 6" 75 From Test #6 Going S FG 4.6 135.4 129.5 1 95.0 99.4 5-10 8 6" 75 from Test #7 Going S FG 3.9 130.9 125.9 1 95.0 96.6 5-10 9 V. 75' From Test #8 going S FG 3.7 125.4 124.9 1 95.0 95.8 5.10 10 6" 75' From Test #9 Going S FG 4.0 129.5 124.5 1 95.0 95.6 5-10 11 6" 75' From Test #10 going S FG 4.7 130.7 124.9 1 95.0 95.8 5-10 12 6" 50' From test #11 going S FG 4.0 128.8 123.9 1 95.0 95.1 REMARKS: iTest#5 not completed. SOIL TYPE OPT.MOISTURE MAXDRYDENSITY (1)04-0203/4"crush 7.6 130.3 (2) 04-030 sandy crush 10.3 121.3 Technician K. Yerger Reviewed by ,6 41( REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT DI Client JRW Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger Weather Cloudy breezy cool Finish Sub Grade LOCATION KEY BE Backfill BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing ST Street RT Retest SD Storm Drain SL Sewerline TR Trench WL Wall WTL Waterline PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Date 12/11/03 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FS Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST TEST LOCATION % COM NO. DEPTH ELEV. % DENSITY SOIL WET SPEC FIELD � '-.1v;.: G-1 (East Side of Building -Vestibule Area Floor) MOIST DRY TYPE 12111 " 8;� ,- _.. ..,. 4" W of G-1 G' Sof 6-1 FS13 ,4.7 120.1" 122;3 054S 95,0 7,L Gauge #7 standardized at site prior to testing. Joel Martineau SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Proctor 03-054 11.5 130-1 03-0545 (Sandy) 11.5 125.8 Reviewed by ' REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS TEST BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD LOCATION ELEV. % L DENSITYSOIL 0 COM PROJECT Rexburg Deseret Industries DEPTH Client JRW Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger 11/06 1 Weather Cloudy breezy cool 11/06 LOCATION KEY 6PI120' S. ofA-1 25' W. of A-1 FSB 3.9 127.7 122.9 SPR 95.0 96.9 BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/INC. Date 11/06/03 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST TEST LOCATION ELEV. % L DENSITYSOIL 0 COM N0. DEPTH MOIST WET DRY TYPE SPEC FIELD Finished sub -base over Plumbing Excavations 11/06 1 6" , 11/06 2 6PI120' S. ofA-1 25' W. of A-1 FSB 3.9 127.7 122.9 SPR 95.0 96.9 a<«. compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. Technician Joel Martineau SOILTYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRV DENSITY FiruPR sandy = SPR 126.8 1 Reviewed by DATE REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD DENSITY FORSGREN PROJECT DI WET DRY _ ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW 4-22-04 1, 8" ' Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger FSB 6.4 Date 4-22-04 Weather sunny/warm SPR 95.0 Project 01-02-01360001 LOCATION KEY SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY BF Backfill SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE % COMP WET DRY SPEC FIELD 4-22-04 1, 8" ' 50 from'' centerline of N.side pad FSB 6.4 134.9 126.7 SPR 95.0 100.7' REMARKS: Dean Zollinger asked for this test to make sure they could continue lifts for parking lot SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run 9.6 132.6 (PR) Sandy Zollinger Pit 11.5 125.8 (SPR) Technician Kathy Yerger Reviewed by C, DATE REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD SOIL TYPE FORSGREN PROJECT DI SPEC FIELD _ ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW 25'from EOC going W. retest of test # 1 FSG FSG 6.4 5.2 Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger SPR SPR 95.0 95.0 Date 3-9-04 Weather sunny/warm OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Project 01-02-0136 0001 9.6 LOCATION KEY (PR):::. BF Backfill SO Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade EEC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE % COMP WET DRY SPEC FIELD 3-9-04 3-9-04 1 2 8" 8" 25'from EOC going W. retest of test # 1 FSG FSG 6.4 5.2 124.1 135.0 117.7 128.3 SPR SPR 95.0 95.0 90.3 96.8 REMARKS: Dean Zollinger asked for this test to make sure they could continue lifts for parking lot SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run 9.6 132.6 (PR):::. Sandy Zollinger Pit 11.5 125.8 (SPR) Technician Kathy Yerger Reviewed by \\CJ1 DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD % COMP FORSGREN PROJECT DI FIELD _ ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger Date 3-22-04 Weather sunny/warm 34' from EOB SE corner 40' from test#1 going N. 40' from test #2 going N. 40' from test# 3 going N. 40' from test# 4 going N. FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG Project 01-02-01360001 130.5 132.0 134.6 132.7 133.6 LOCATION KEY SPR SPR SPR SPR SPR 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 -96.1 96.7 98.1 98.1 97.8 BF Backfill SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE % COMP WET DRY SPEC FIELD 3-22-04 3-22-04 3-22-04 3-22-04` 3-22-04' 1 2 3 4 5 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 34' from EOB SE corner 40' from test#1 going N. 40' from test #2 going N. 40' from test# 3 going N. 40' from test# 4 going N. FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG 5.3 6.0 6.8' 3.8 4.8 130.5 132.0 134.6 132.7 133.6 125.2 126.0 127.8 127.9 127.5 SPR SPR SPR SPR SPR 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 -96.1 96.7 98.1 98.1 97.8 REMARKS: SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Dean Zollinger asked for this test to make sure they could continue lifts for parking lot Zollinger Pit run 9.6 132.6 (PR) Sandy Zollinger Pit 11.5 125.8 (SPR) Technician Kathy Yerger Reviewed by DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD % COMP FORSGREN PROJECT DI Rexburg 1 1RT 2 2RT 3 8" 81, 8" 6" 6" ASSOCIATESIINC. Client LDS Church/JRW 117.1 112.6 127.8 123.3 16.4 121.5 141.2 133.0 135.0 128.3 1 1 1 1 1 Contractor Jacobsen 3/24 3/24 Date 3-24-04 Weather clear, warm Project 01-02-0136 0001 LOCATION KEY BF Backfill SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY ISOIL TYPE % COMP WET I DRY SFECI FIELD 3/24 1 1RT 2 2RT 3 8" 81, 8" 6" 6" 14 From S. Retaining Wall Center Of Dockramp 10 From N retaining wall Center Of Dockramp IF' G From S Retaining Wall Center Of Dockramp it "fiS§iaf��u t {! r @FSB FSB -8". @FSB @FSB @FSB 3.9% 3.7% 4.0% 6.1% 52% 117.1 112.6 127.8 123.3 16.4 121.5 141.2 133.0 135.0 128.3 1 1 1 1 1 95.0 87.3% 95.0 93.0% 95.0 91.7% 95.0 99+% 95.0 96.8% 3124 3/24 3/24 3/24 REMARKS: SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE I MAX DRY DENSITY (1)03054. 9.6 '- 132.6 Results of at least 95.0% of Proctor Density are passing. Tester K. Yerger Reviewed by /I tL DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD °% COMP FORSGREN PROJECT DI FIELD 3-25-04 3-25-04 _ ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW FSG FSG 6.3 6.0 132.9 135.0 Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger 95.0 95.0 98.1 96.8 Date 3-25-04 Weather sunny/warm MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run Project 01-02-0136 0001 132.6 LOCATION KEY Sandy Zollinger Pit BF Backfill SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE °% COMP WET DRY SPEC FIELD 3-25-04 3-25-04 1 2 8" ' 8' 40' from W. end of retaining wall footing 20' from test#1 going E. FSG FSG 6.3 6.0 132.9 135.0 126.6 128.3 FIR PR 95.0 95.0 98.1 96.8 REMARKS: SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run 9.6 132.6 (PR) Sandy Zollinger Pit 11.5 125.8 (SPR) Technician Kathy Yerger Reviewed by DATE TEST NO. REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD % COMP FORSGREN PROJECT DI 3-25-04 3-25-04 1 2 ASSOCIATES/INC. Client JRW 6.3 6.0 132.9 ' 126.6 135.0 128.3 PR PR Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger REMARKS: SOIL TYPE Date 3-25-04 Weather sunny/warm 9.6 132.6 Project 01-02-0136 0001 LOCATION KEY Sandy Zollinger Pit 11.5 125.8 BF Backfill SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY BP Building Pad SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade ELC Electrical TR Trench FB Finish Base FTG Footing WL Wall FSS Finish Sub Base ST Street WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade RT Retest PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY ISOIL TYPE % COMP WET DRY SPEC FIELD 3-25-04 3-25-04 1 2 8' 8" 40' from W. end of retaining wall footing 20' from test#1 going E. FSG FSG 6.3 6.0 132.9 ' 126.6 135.0 128.3 PR PR 95.0 95.0 ' 98.1 96.8 REMARKS: SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run 9.6 132.6 (PR) Sandy Zollinger Pit 11.5 125.8 (SPR) Technician Kathy Yerger Reviewed by \�/ REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT DI FG Finish Grade Client JRW FEB Finish Sub Base Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger FF Finish Floor Weather clear/sunny LOCATION KEY BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot �vFORSGREN ASSOCIATES /INC. Date 4/21/04 Project 01-02-01360001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FEB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL % COMP WET DRY SPE FIELD 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 4/21/04 1 ` 2 3 - 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 6" 8" 8' 8' 8" 6 8" 8" 8" 8" 6" T 58'N. of NE corner of building 20" from test #1 going W. 10' from test # 2 going W. 10' from test #3 going W. 10' from test #4 going W.' 5' from test #5 going W. 25' from test #6 going W. 15' from N.wall center of N. pad 46' from center of front door going E. 40' from test #9 going S. 10+from test #10 going S. 40' from test #9 going N. FSB FSB FSB FSB FSB FSB FSB, FSB FSB FSB FSB jFSB 6.2 ` 5 9 6.4 6.0 5.7 5.6 4.5' 5.1 6.3 4.7 4.8 1 4.3 138.6 140.9 139,5 139.3 141.3 139.4 134.5 137.0 141.0 138.6 135.6 1 134.8 130.5 133.0 131.1 131.4 133.7 132.0 128.7 130.3 132.7 132.4 129.5 1 129.3 FPR PR PR PR PR PR PR 1 PR 95 0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 915.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 98.44/21/04 100.3 98.9 99.1 100.9 99.6 97.1 98.3 100.1 99.9 97.6 97.5 REMARKS: Established a rolling pattern with Zollingers rollers as 14 passes. Elevations modified to reflect actual FF. Any compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run pit run = PR 9.6 132.6 126.8 sandy=:' Technician Kathy Yerger . -1-1. _ "' \ , REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT DI FG Finish Grade Client JRW FSB Finish Sub Base Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger FF Weather clear/sunny FIELD 4/21/04 13 LOCATION KEY 20' from test #12 going N. FSB ' BF Backfill SO Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot �vFORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Date 4/21/04 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor UH I tI tb I NO. I tb I DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE % COMP WET DRY SPECF FIELD 4/21/04 13 6" 20' from test #12 going N. FSB ' 4.5136.9 130.9 PR 95,0 98.7 4/21/04 14 6 30' from test #9 going E. FSB c 3.6 127.7 123.3 PR 95.0 93.0 4/21/04 15 6' retest of test #14 FSB ; 3.4 130.5 126.1 PR 95.0 95.1 4/21/04 16 6" > 140' from S.W. corner of building FSB 3.6 134.2 129.6 PR 95.0 97.7 4/21/04 17 6' 20'.from test # 16 going Wi; FSB ' 3.5 136.6 132.0 PR 95.0 99.5' 4/21/04 18 6' 20' from test # 17 going W. FSB.: 4.2 134.0 128.5 PR 95.0. 96.9 4/21/04 19 6"", 30' from test # 18 going W, FSB, 5.0 132.9 126.6 PR 95.0 , 95.5 4/21/04 20 6" 60' from test #19 going N. FSB 3.7 134.0 129.2 PR 95.0 97.4 4/21/04 21. , 6" 40' from test #20 going N,f FSB . 4.1 131.2 '126.0 PR 95.0 95:OI; 4/21/04 22 : 6" 40' from test #21 going N. FSB 3.4 131.1 126.7 PR 95.0 95.6 4/21/04 23 6" 40' from test # 22 going N. FSB { 3.8 133.3 128.4 PR 95.0 96.9 REMARKS: Established a rolling pattern with Zollinger$ rollers as 14 passes. Elevations modified to reftlect actual FF. Any compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY Zollinger Pit run pit run = PR 9.6 132.6 126.8 sandy =" I ecnnlaan Kenny Terger Reviewed by,,,)- FORSGREN ASSOCIA TES / INC. Date 4/12/04 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS Finish Grade FB Finish Base BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD Finish Sub Base PROJECT DI Rexburg FF Finish Floor Client JRW Tests 1-6 Referenced to NW corner of retaining wall near RR Tracks. Contractor Jacobsen/Zollinger Weather Sunny, Breezy 1 6" 45' SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner: WL FTG FSB LOCATION KEY 4.2 132.8 127.4 BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot FORSGREN ASSOCIA TES / INC. Date 4/12/04 Project 01-02-0136 0001 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST NO. TEST DEPTH LOCATION ELEV. % MOIST DENSITY SOIL TYPE % COM WET I DRY SPECI FIELD Tests 1-6 Referenced to NW corner of retaining wall near RR Tracks. 4/12/04 1 6" 45' SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner: WL FTG FSB FSB 4.2 132.8 127.4 2 95 97.9 4/12/04 2 8.. 120' SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner: WL FTG FSB FSB 3.9 131.3 126.4 2 95 97.2 4/12/04 3 6" 220' _SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner: WL FTG FSB FSB 5.2 141:8 934.8 1 95 +99% 4/12/04 4 6" 320' SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner: WL FTG FSB FSB 4.3 134.0 128.5 2 95 98.8 4112/04 5 6" 420' SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner. WL FTG FSB FSB 5.7 "138.7 131.2 1 95 97.3 4/12/04 6 6" 520' SW of NW Retaining Wall Corner: WL FTG FSB FSB 5.6 135.1 127.9 2 95 98.3 4/12/04 7 6" 245' W of Bldg Coord. line 4 On H line: PL FSB FSB 4.2 133.9 128.5 2 95 98.8 4/12/04 8 8" 195' W of Bldg Coord. line 4 On H line: PL FSB FSB 4.2 133.1 127.7 2 95 98.2 4/12/04 9 81, 150' W of Bldg Coord. line 4 On H line: PL FSB FSB 4.3 135.2 129.5 1 95 96.0 4/12/04 10 6" 180' W of Bldg Coord. line 4 On F line: PL FSB FSB 4.0 132.5 127.4 2 95 97.9 4/12/04 11 8" 210' W of Bldg Coord, line 4. On E line: PL. FSB FSB 4.6 137.2 130.2 1 95 96.5 4/12/04 12 6" 180' W of Bldg Coord. line 4 On Cline: PL FSB FSB 3.7 133.5 128.7 1 95 98.9 REMARKS: Tests 7-12 are referenced off building plan coordinates. SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY 1: pit run= PR 9.1 1349%`. 2pit run = 03-054 11.5 130.1 Compaction of at least 94.5% is acceptable. Technician Joel Martineau Reviewed byC�rw -- 4 12 04 W Retaining Wall and Parking Area