HomeMy WebLinkAboutT2M DOCUMENTS - 03-00015 - BYUI - Student Housing 16 Buildings (160 units).16
U-1
=:. --- - a w -L3
I
44 U.J *ft 1,
1D 3"" -i'Fleri
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project Na: 03-0001
Mix No.: 902
Report No.,: 1
Contraitvr: R. E. Beck Construction
Supplier: Walters Ready Mix
Structures; Footings &stem walls
Mirx Design Components Mix Design Proportions
Cement Type I & II LA 4801bs.
Water 29 gals./2-41 Ibs.
C.A.: 3/4" Rock J -F 96 ASTM C 33 1794 lbs,
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 oz./cwt.
Pro.krete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwt. cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43%
W/C Ratio .50
Air Content 5.0% +/-lwo%
Slump 4,• +/41-f
SF% -DAUPM
p eaffied
Fc (p
2500
ID
CYL
coff.
Date
TeS
t
Test
Taftl
compnm-v
Ca
Fract.,
Diam, &
Faict
Area
cast
ftp
Date
Load
Sbvngth
HWg.ht
Uw
1.00
28.26
4-14
7
4-221
52000
1840
Neo.
Shear
0999A
6ffxl2"1.00
28-26
+16
7
4-23
53000
1 875
Neo.
Shear
1000A
6'0'xl2ff
1.00
28.26
4-17
7
4-24
71500
2530
I%W.
Shear
1001A
6Nlr
1.00
28.26
4-18
7
4-25
64500
2285
Neo.
Shear
1002A
6N12"
1.00
28.26
4-21
7
4-28
52000
1840
Neo.
Shear
1003A
VxlTy
1.00
28-26
4-23
7
4-30,
950mi
3360
Neo.
Shear
1004A
6"x12"
1.00
28.26
+29
7
5-6
55000
1945
Neo.
Shear
Neo.= Neoprene
cap.
Sul .= Sulphur
cap ASTM
C 617
ig
Remarks.
Reviewed By: Bret L McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho,, City of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix, JHS Architects, Bateman Hall, R.E. Beck
Const,
r,q
r
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SUMMARY
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No..: 902
Report No..: 2
Cvntrac#vr: R. E. Beck Construction
Supplier* Walters Ready Mix
0
Structures: Footings &item wails
Mix Design Components Mix Design Proportions
Cement Type I & Il LA 480 lbs.
Water 29 gals./241 lbs.
W
C.A. a 3/4" Rock 3-F 96 ASTM C 3.3 1794 lbs..
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 Oz./cwt.
Prokrete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwt, cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43%
W/C Ratio .50
Air Content 5.0°k +/-1.0%
Slump 4!41 +/-1"
f'C
= 2500
11D CYL CAW. CO- ENft TeA Test Total Campo Cap Fra re
Wim. FacL Area Cast Age Date Load
Strength
&
Height
&,M B 6'0'x12 1.00 28.26 4-14 28 5-13 80000 2830 Neo. Shear
0998C 6N12'Y 1.00 28.26 4-14 28 5--
N1 "
N1.2" 1.00 28--26 4-16 28 5-14 96000 3400 Neo. Shear
0999C 6J)12" 1.00 2826 4-16 28 5-14 82000 2900 Neo. Shear
10000 6"X1ZIW 1.00 28.26 4-17 28 5-15 72000 2550 Neo. Shear
78000 2760 I. Shear
100K 6"xl2ff 1.00 28.26 4-17 28 S-15
1001B 6'vx1.2 1.00 28.26 4-18 28, 5-16 92000 3260 Neo- Shear
10010 6N12" 1.00 28-26 4-18 '28 5-16 97000 3430 Neo. Shear
1002B GN12" 1.00 2-8.26 4-21 28 5-19 96000 3400 Neo. Shear
1002C 6J"x12" 1.00 28.26 4-21 28 5-19 86GOO 3040 Neo. Shear
100313 67x12" 1.00 28.26 4-23 28 5-21 119000 4210 Neo. Shear
1003C 6*"xl2" 1.00 28.26 4-23 28 5-21 118000 4180 Neo. Shear
1006A 6"xU" 1.00 28.26 5-2 7 5-9 76250 2700 Neo. Shear
1007A 6'flk12" 1.00 28.26 5-6 7 5-13 76250 2700 Neo. Shear
1008A 60x!2" 1.00 28.26 5-8 7 5-15 62500 2210 NieO. Shear
ISA 6"XJ-2'rJr LOO 28.26 5-12 7 5-19 51000 1810, Neo. Shear
Neo.= Neoprene cap. SLd.= Sulphur cap ASTM C 617
Remarks;,
S&
RevilO%.-....ff By: Bret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix, JHS Architects,, Bateman Hall
;i
7
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SUMMARY
Pf'D . fEf C)
r_Yv
t til D
19.1
0 ' "--'866
'_5
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No,,: 902
Report No.: 3
co re. R. E. Beck Construction
Supplier: Walters Ready Mix
Structures: Foobrugs &stem walls
Mix Design Components Mix DesignProportions
Cement Type I & H LA 480 lbs.
Water 29 gals./241 lbs,
C.A.: 3/4" Rock 3-F 96 /15TH C 33 1794 lbs.
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 Ibs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 oz./cwt.
Prokrete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwk cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43°!0
W/C Ratio .50
Air Content
Slump 5.09'0 +/-10%
4" +/-l'F"
P_
IflEfI Cc (Psis= 2500
31D
Lwyo
Corr.
CA
Date
Test
Test
Total
compa
Cap
Fracture
Diem.
FacL
Area
Cftt
Age
Date
Load
Strengt1h
a
Height
1004B
6"xl2ff
1.00
28.26
4-29
28
5-27
94000
3320
Neo,
Shear
1004C
6N12"
1.00
28.26
4-29
28
5-27
94000
3320
Neo.
Shear
1006B
6wxlr
1.00
28.26
5-2
28
5-30
97000
3430
Neo.
Shear
1006C
6"x1r
1.00
28.26
5-2
28
5-30
101000
3570
Neo.
Shear
1007B
6N1 "
1.00
28.26
5-6
28
6-3
1040,00
4210
Neo.
Shear
1007C
6N12"
1.00
28.26
5-6
28
.6-3
101000
3570
Neo.
Shear
1008B
6N12"
1.00
28.26
-5-8
28
6-5
119000
4210
Neo.
Shear
1008C
6"x12"
1.00,
28.26
5-8
28
6-5
115000
4070
Neo...
Shear
Ims
612""
1.00
28-26
5-12
28
&9
110000
3890
Neo.
Shear
1009C
6"x127
1.00
28.26
5-12-
28
6-9
112000
3960
Neo.
Shear
1010A
6N12"
1.00
28.26
5-19
7
5-26
92.000
2700
Neo.
Shear
1010B
6N12ff
1.00
28.26
5-19
28
6-16
130000
4600
Neo.
Shear
1010C
6"rx12
1.00
28.26
5-19
28
6-16
134000
4740
Neo.
Shear
1011A
3xi2"
1.00
28.26
5-27
7
6-3
74000
2620
Neo.
Shear
1012A
6"xUff
1.00
2-8.26
6-9
7
6-16
94000
3330
Neo.
Shear
1013A
6"X12"
-1.00
28.26
6-10
7
6-17
71000
2510
Neo.
Shear
Neo.= Neoprene cap.
Sul.= Sulphur cap ASTM
C 617
Remarks:
ANIAN
Revi.... By: Bret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho., City of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix,, 7HS Architects, Bateman Hall, R.E. Beck
Const.
vp
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SUMMARY
P.O. Box 143
208-403-1866
Rexburg, JID 83441
Project BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No.: 902
Report No..0 4
Contractor. R. E. Beck Construction
Supplier: Walters Ready Mix
Structuress.. Footings & stern wails
Mix Design Components Mix Design Proportions
Cement Type i & R LA 480 lbs,.
Water 29 gals.,/241 lbs.
C.A.: 3/4" Rock J -F 96 ASTM, C 33 1794 lbs.
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 oz./cwt.
Prokrete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwt, cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43-Ok
W/C Ratio .50
Air Content 5.0% +/-1.0%
Slump 4r' +/-1„
Specified fcPM)= 2500
ID
Cot
CAM.
CY*
Date
Test
Test
Toil
compe
Cap
Ferre
Diam,
FacL
Area
Cast
Age*
Dam
Load
Stmngth
Height
1 11 B
" 1 "'r
x ,00
�
-r27
28
6-24
129000
4560
Neo.
Shear
1011C
1.00.!-
6-24
126000
460
Neo.
Shear
1012E
6"x 1
100
28.26
6-9
28
7-
119200
4220Shear
10120
1"
1.00
28.26
6-9
28
7-7IL21400
4300
Neo*
Shear
1013E
x12
1.00
28.26
6-10
28.
115200
4080
Neo.
Shear
1013C
'N1
1.00
28.26
610
28
7-8
114400
4050
Neo.
Shear
1
"x1
1.00
. 2-6
6-1
6-19
65000
2300
Neo
Shear
6 12"�
1#
1
6-24
66000
2330
Neo.
Shear
Neo. = Neoprene
cap..
Sul . = Sulphur
cap ASTM
C 617
Remarks;
Reviewed By. Brei L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg., Walters Ready Mix., JHS Architects, Bateman Half, R.E. Beck
Const..
it
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SUMMARY
P.G. Box 143.
208-403-1866
F,*,exburg, ID 83441
Project BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No.: 902
Report No.: 5
Cantradbor: R. E. Beck Construction
Suppliers. Wafters Ready Mix
Structures; Footings &stern wails
Mix Design Components Mix Design Proportlons
Cement Type I & II LA 480 lbs.
Water 29 gals./241 lbs.
C.A.. 3/4" Rods J -F 96 ASTM C 33 17941bs.
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs,.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 Oz./cm.
Prokrete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwt cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43%
W/C Ratio .50
Air Content 5.10% +/-1.0%
Slump 4" +/-l'r"
f'C
ID
4DAm
CAWs
Coo
Daft
TeSt
To*
TOW
cmp.-
Cap
Diam.
FacL
Apm
cast
Age
Date
Load
SbwUJ"
HekAt
1014B
6"x12:ff
1.00
28-26
6-12
28
7-10
113000
4OW
Neo,.
Shear
1014C
6"kJL2
1.00
28.26
6-12
28
7-10
117000
4140
NeD.
Shear
1015B
6Nir
1.00
28.26
6-17
28
7-15
83000
2940
Neo.
Shear
10150
6NIZ"
1.00
28.26
6-17
28
7-15
91000
3220
Neo.
Shear
1017A
6*1x1Zff
LOO
28.26
6-24
7
'7-1
52000
1840 dV
Neo.
Shear
1019A
GNU"
1.00
28.2-6
6-25
7
7-2
71000
2510
Neo.
Shear
1.02
6 Ak12"
1.00
28.26
7-1
7
7-8
74000
2620
Neo.
Shear
1026A
6"x!2"
1.00
28.26
7-9
7
7-16
71000
2510
Neo.
Shear
Neo.= Neoprene
cap.
Sul.= Sulphur
cap ASTM
C 617''
Remarks:
Reviewed By. Bret L McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, CO of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix, JHS Architects, 'Bateman Hall, R.E. Beck
Const.
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SUMMARY
?.0. Sox 143
208-40s-1866
Ri.m.lxburq, ID 8341-40
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No.: 902
Report No.: 6
Contracts: R. E. Beck Construction
Supplier: Walters Ready Mix
Structures: footings & stem walls
Hix Design Components Mix Design Proportions
Cement Type I & II LA 480 lbs.
Water 29 gals,./241 lbs.
C.A.. 3J4" Rock J -F 96 ASTM C 33 1794 lbs.
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 oz./cwt.
Prokrete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cvvt. cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43%
W/C Ratio .SO
Air Content 5.096 +J-1.00/0
Slump 4ff
Spedfied
fc JE!Ei
CY.
= 2500
fir.
CYL
Date
Test
Test
Total al
Cap
FracWre
ID
Dimi
FacL
Ama
Cas
Age
Date -
Lead
Height
102613
6ftxl27
1.00
2-8.26
-09
4100
Neo.
Shear
1026
6 12"
1.00
2.26
-09
28
8-06
121000
4280
Neo.
Shear
1
"x1"
1.00
28.26
7-11
7
7-1865000
2300
Neo.
Shear
1027B
"'xlm
1.00
28-26
7-11
2-3
-08
106000
3750Neo.
Shear
10270
6N12"
1.00
28.26
7-11
28
B-08105000
3710
Neo.
Shear
1028A
6N12"
1.00
28.2-6
-11
7
7-182620
Neo.
Shear
1 28Bc1
.f
1.00
28.26
-11
28
8-08
1330
4700
Neo.
Sir
10280
67xl2
1.00
28.267.11
28
8-08
132000
4670
Neo.
Shear
1036A
6 x.1 �
1.
-22
7
7-29
73000
2580
Neo.
Shear
10368
6N12ff
1.
-2
28
8-1997000
3430
Neo.
Shear
6C
6"wx12.
1.00
28+26
-22
28
8-1992000
3250
Neo*'Shear
1046A
1 m
LOO
28.26
8-04
7
8-11
72000
2550
Neo.
Shear
1"
1.00
28.26
8_04
2
9-01
110000
3890
Neo*
Shear
"xl'w
1.0028.26
B-04
28
-1
1400
-0
4030
Neo-
Shear
1047A
6 12"
1.00
.2.6
8-05
f
8-12
78000
6
Neo-
hear
1047
0'xi. "
1_00
28.26
3400
Neo.
Shear
1
'�1 ff
1.00
28.26
-OS
28
9-02
99000
3SOO
Neo*
Shear
Neo.= Neoprene
cap.
Sud..= Sulphur
cap ASTM
C 617
Kamm:
Reviewed By*. Brei L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix, JHS Archifects, Bateman Half, R.E. Beck
Const.
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SUMMARY
P , G. Box 143
208-403-1866
Rexburg, ID 3344t"
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No.,: -902
Report No.: 7
Contractor: R. E. Beck Construction
Supplier: Walters Ready Mix
Structuress. Footings &stem walls
Moc Design Components Mix Design Proportions
Cement Type I & H LA 4801bs.
Water 29 gals./241 lbs.
C.A.: 3/4" Rock )-F 96 ASTM C 33 1794 lbs.
FA: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 Oz./cwt.
Prolvete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwG cemnt
Sand/Aggregate Ratio
43%
W/C Ratio
.50
Air Content 5.040 +/-1.0%
Slump 4" +/-I-F"
Remarks:
Reviewed
By:
Bret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix,, )HS Architects, Bateman Hall, R.E. Beck
Const.
6"x12
1.00 28.26
7
8 1 3
68000
2410 Neo,.
Shear
10480
6nx12
1.00 28.26
28
9-03
118000
4170 Neo.
Shear
1048C
6'wxl2 MY
.00 28.26
28
9-03
115000 1
h
Q70 Ne,.
Shear
1-054A
6N12'w
1.00 2-8.26
7
8-18
80000
2830 Neo.
Shea,
1054B
61"X12"
1.00 28.26
28
9-w
98000
3470 Neo.
Shear
1054C
6`x12"r
1.00 28.26
28
9LO8 1
102000
T.
Neo.
Shear
1055A
6'%xl2
1.00 1� 28.26
7
3010 Neo1w
Shear
1055B
6JwX11228.26
28
9-08
109000
3860 Neo.
Shear
1055C
60x12
1.00 28.2
28
9-08
112000
39W
Shear30
11060A
6m"x12
1.00 28.26
7
8-25
80000
28Neo.
Shear
1074A
6"'xl
1.0 0 28.26
7
9-02
99M
3500 Neo.
Shear
M
ITE "a
Wei
Remarks:
Reviewed
By:
Bret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, Walters Ready Mix,, )HS Architects, Bateman Hall, R.E. Beck
Const.
P.O. Box 1.43
208-757-9172
Rexburg, ID 83440
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Mix No.: 902
Contractor: R. E. Beck Construction
Suppliers. Walters Ready Mix
W
Structures: Footings &stem walls
Mix Design Components Mix Design Proportions
Cement Type I & Il LA 48o Ibs.
Water 29 gals./241 lbs.
C.A.: 3/4" Rock )-F 96 ASTM C 33 1794 Ibs.
F.A.: Sand MA -22 ASTM C 33 1260 lbs.
MB -AE 90 ASTM C 260 1 Oz./cwt.
Prokrete N ASTM C 494 3oz./cwt, cement
Sand/Aggregate Ratio 43%
W/C Ratio .50
Air Content 5.0% +/-.1.0%
Slump 4" t/-1"
Specified
fc -(Va-
W
2500
CV11
CA
Date
Test
Test
Total
comp.
Cap
Fracture
Diam,
FacL
Area
Cast
Age
Date
Load
ga"qth
&
Height
1017B
6ffxl2 Ar
1-00
28.26
6-24
28
7-22
120000
4250
Neo.
Shear
1017C
6 .. x12"
1.00
2:8.26
6-24
28
7-22
113000
4000
Neo.
Shear
1019B
6"x12"
1.00
28.26
6-25
2-8
7-27'
130000
4600
Neo.
Shear
1019C
6r'x12"
1.00
28.26
6-25
28
7-27
126000
4460
Neo,
Shear
1022B
6N12"
1.00
28-26
7-1
28
7-29
100000
3540
Neo.
Shear
1022C
6"xl2ff
1.00
28-26
7-1
28
7-29
104000
3680
Neo.
Shear
1060B
6N12"
1.00
28.26
8-18
28
915
98wo
3470
Neo.
Shear
1060C
6"tx12r'r
1.00
28.26
8-18
28
9-15
110000
3890
Neo.
Shear
1074B
6"x12'v
1.00
28.26
8-26
28
9-23
108000
3820
Neo.
Shear
1074C
L00
28.26
8-26
28
9-23
107000
3780
Neo.
Shear
Neo.= Neoprene
cap.
Sul .= Sulphur
cap ASTM
C 617
Remarks:
Reviewed By: Bret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, Walters Ready M6c, JHS Architects., Bateman Hall, R.E. Beck
Const.
� 2 L�0 R 9
P.O. Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
a. a�.s r�.a aaa aAeaa�Rra�i.: Y.a �a�• �+tea .� iaav�aa 7snr e�: T ed.n.a• �
Architect: JHS Architects
ContraCtor: Batemanw"Hall Inc.
Na. D1: The following changes were authorized,..
1. Rock Removal at SW corner of site based on revisions to entrance elevations.
2 -Add a Manhole section at MH#l.
3. Mass rack excavation beneath building #f4.
4. Werk in right of- way requited by the City of Rexburg.
5. Credit for Permits and Fee Aflowances,
X10. D2: The following changes were authorized...
I. Revise size of West entrance culvert.
Z. Add culvert (15"} at East entrance.
3. Add stub out to south for future norm water.
4. Modify communications and TV conduit system per Owner.
5. Add approximately 232 LF of storm sewer- shown as existing on site drawings.
Na. 03: The following changes were authorized.,.
1.
Rock
removal below
Building
#?,
2.
Rock
removal below
Building
#7.
3.
Rock
removal below
building
#1+D.
4.
Rack
removal below
Building
#i3.
5.
Revise water valves
to street,
delete S valves.
b.
Cut and
bind carpet
base.
7. Revise Storm Drains at Building #3 and Building #7.
8. Upgrade Ultrasonic Flow Meter to ISCO 4210.
9. Upgrade Toilet Accessories
10. Replace approximately 40' of Footing and Foundation at Building #5
Na. D4: The following changes were authorized..,
1. Raise parking grace east of #8 & #11 to cover existing S.D.
Z. Adjust electrical service for substation trencher to crass..
3. Changs makeup grilles at center units to Y8" x 6"'.
4.. Credit for exhaust fans duplicated.
S. Credit for transformers selected by Owner.
Reviewed By: Bret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, JHS Architects., Bateman Hall
.L
ARCH. SUPPw INST. SUMMARY
P.O. Box 143 ......
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
Project:
BYU
Idaho Student Family HousingL
Architect: ]HS Architects
Project
No.:
03-0.001
Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.
No. U1: The civil information given to the Contractors survey shows the buildings 2" larger in each
direction than the foundation plans. This is due to a 1" overhang of the brick all around
the buildings. The civil layout received by the surveyor indicates'the outside of brick
dimension. The Contractor's surveyor should "split the difference"'..
No. 02: The 18."' culvert at the NW corner of the site needs to he placed deeper. The invert at the
east end of the culvert needs to be at approximately the grade of the existing d -itch at
the east end of the culvert. The culvert should be graded'at a 5°fQ slope and the west end
should be raked for about 8 ft, to allow the water to flow out of the west end.
No. D3: Shop Drawing and Submittal Reviews have prompted the following minor revisions....
1. Refer to Wall Section IO/A6.5. The top of Stud Wal!/Truss Bearing elevation at the
Utility Rooms on the Rear of the townhouse unity is to be 11.0f - 5 1/2'• above the main
floor of the townhouse units. Change the 10?'- 9"' dimension to 10' - 5 1/2"'10
2. Refer to dwg. A3.2. Change the truss designations for truss types 3 & 4. Type TR3 will
change t�o TR4 and hype TR4 will change to TRI
3. Refer to column detail I/A3.2. Revise the Truss Bearing elevation to 24' - 0"' above the
first floor of the center units.
No. 04; The attached information was requested by the contractor. This information pertains to
Building #8 and the revision made by the Addendum #1 during the Kidding period.. See
attached ASI -4 dwg,"s #1 & #2.
No. DS: The attached drawing answers a question rased earlier by the contractor and pertains to
Building #5. See attached ASI -5 dwg. #1.
No. D6: Shop drawing reviews have prompted the following revisions to dwg. A2.1 Refer to
dwg. A2.1, upper right hand corner � Footing & Foundation Plan far buildings #6, #9 &
#13. The T.Q.P. elevation at the left hand side of These three buildings should be 961. 4"
not 96" - 0'". The two left handed piers of these buildings should be at 96' - 4"'. This
change will also affect Submittal #05-2, dwg. A131 at the upper right hand corner.
No. 07. Shop drawing reviews have prompted the following revisions to dwg, A2.2 Refer to
dwg. A2,,2, lower right hand corner, Footing & Foundation Plan for building #15. The
T.O.P. elevation at the right hand side of this buildings should be 103'- 8"' not 100' - Off,
The tap of the two right hand piers at this building will be 103' - $", The top of boating at
these piers should be at elevation 99"- 8"" . This change will also affect 5ubmittai #D5-2,
dwg. AB2 at the center right hand area of the dwg.
0
ARCH. SUPP. INST'. SU�MMARY
P it 0 . Box 143
ReAurg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Architect: JHS Architects
Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc,
Na, a8: Resolution of framing questions..,
Item 1. Shear Wall Location: The location of shear wail hold -clowns at the furnace raom
closets are incorrectly shown on Addendum No. 1 sketches. Correct location is
the rear of the closets and over the bearing wall footing. See attached sketch
ASI -8-1.
Item 2, Center Shear Wall Hold -dawns: The center party wall is a shear wall on both
sides at the two lower levels and thus needs anchors at both ends, dee attached
sketch ASI -8-1. At exterior foundation wall, an alternate detail is included herein
which would eliminate the two Simpson hold-downs on the exteriorised of the
double shear wall
items 3. J Bolts: .]HS has re��ewed the use of a 7j8" x �.�" J boil for use with hold -dawns.
the capacity of the J bolt is not adequate for PHDS's or PHD6"s. Use 28r/1
deformed anchors as scheduled.
Idem 4. Wind Lift:
a. At bottom of walls, SPI's will not be required if wail sheathing laps past the
plate and is nailed to either the rim foist or wail studs below the floor system.
Suggest use of 9 ft, or 10 ft. long sheathing. Any horizontal joints in sheathing
panels which occur over the stud walks must be solid blocked for shear nailing.
b. At tap of wars, along the Truss bearing side, an H10 hard -dawn at each tress
and to the wall plates is adequate to transfer uplift load's into the waif below, The
H10 may be mounted at inside face of wall plates or at the exterior face. SP2-'s at
each stud palate is not necessary.
C. At the top of wally along the gable ends of the buildings, an SP2 hold-down
between plates and spud below is required due to extreme uplift loads.
4utloakers need to be attached to the plates with an HIO yr H7 as scheduled.
Item 5. Foundation Anchor Bolts: All wafts with sheathing are carrying some shear
loads. Thus, those wolfs need anchor bolts sized and spaced per the "Shear Wail
Schedule". The Shear Wail Schedule shows 5/8"' x 12"' AB at various spacings.
The drawings show the same and refer to the schedule for spacing except in two
cases.,. Wall section 7/A6.4 and Section 8/A6A, Wall Section 8/A6.4 agrees with
the Schedule at 48" o.c. At wail Section 7/A6.4 either the scheduled 5/8" x 12"' at
48" o,c, or the drawing 5/8"' x 10" at 32" v.c. may be used. At wolfs not shown
with sheathing, anchor baits shall be contractor standard 48" a.c_ and may
employ anchor devices other than bolts and may be 'Jz" diameter if desired.
N9, 09: Floor slab control joints. The attached plan shows a layout of floor, coi joints for a
typical building- See attached sheet ASI -9 Page 2.
L ARCH. SUPP, INSTm SUMMARY
P. 0 Box 143
Rexburg, ICS 83440
208-757-9172
BYU Idaho Student Family Housing Architect: JHS Architects
project No.: 03-0001 Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.
No. IQ: GFS Soffit Outlets. The attached plan shows a layout of GFI duplex outlets in the soffits
of a typical building. See attached sheet ASI -10 Page 2.
No. 11: 1. Framer proposed to use 1 31a.' x 117/8' LVL headers at townhouse stair in lieu of the
85's shown. This change is approved.
2. Transverse header nearest the townhouse entrance door shall extend to nearest
continuous floor joist. At the floor joist, the header shah be supported with a HU11 min,
F
oist hanger or bitter. Floor joist shall be reinforced with full thick shear blocking per joist
manufacturers recommendations. Floor joist shah be a J1 or ]3 in lieu of adjacent JA's
and may,be procured by swapping a )2 with a 31 at the head of the stair.
3. Transverse header at the tap of stair shall bear on the wall below. Header or beam
from kitchen walk shall bear an wail below.
4. Longitudinal headers showy without sizeidentifier may be 12 joists at top of wall or
LVL at contractor's option.
5. In order for stairway wall to support the two transverse headers, the header over the
pantry closet doors needs to be a minimum of (2) Z' x 6-'s.
No. 12: Observation #14 Issues...
Issue#1: FOUNDATWON WALL REPAIR. See attached sketch ASI42 #1 for repair of
"swaled" foundation walls.
Issue#2: DRAG STRUT SPLICING. A single drag strut option is offered if material is full
length. Two splicing options are shown. See attached sketch ASI -12 #2 & #2-A,
Issue#3: STAIR SKIRT STRINGER. Framing contractor discussed several construction
options at stair skirting. The attached sketch ASI -12 #3 shows agreed upon
option.
Issue#4: HEADER LOCATION. At Double Drag Strut, window header shall be located at
inside face of stud. See attached sketch ASI -12 #4.
No. 13: Blacking at the end of trusses, See attached drawing. This detail would replace I/A4,1 on
the construction documents, This detail could be used at every third truss spare. If this
detail is not used, then detail I/A4.-1 on the Construction documents Shall be used.
No. 14: 1. Duct Penetrations through the delta 22 walk at rear of Utility Closets,
The sheathing and nailing for the 18" x 1211 duct through the delta 22 shear wall should
be handled as indicated on the response to RFI -27. The nailing around the duct opening
would be 2_1" o.c, Add shot stud framing next to the duct if it is more than 4" to the
nearest stuff.
Z. 14"" x 14" Return Air from Dinging Room to Mech/Utility at Townhouse Units.
Create a framed opening at the exterior walk for the duct penetration. Use the edge
PnOw Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83440
"Wir
208-757-9172
ARCH. SUPPO INST. SUMMARY
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0,001
•-a � 7} .li' 6i TlOiiii�ao'_ Mi fta-
Architect: JHS Architects
Contractors Bateman-Half Inc.
No. 14: 2. (Continued) nailing all around the opening. Avoid a rim joist splice above the return sir
area. The sheathing on the outside of the wolf should run up along the rim joist and be
nailed to it, A foist hanger at any joists that is over the duct should be used. Again, the
response to RFI -27 works for this opening too.
3. Dryer Vent at Bottom Floor Center Units.
Provide 2"' x approx. 24" furred area at the turner of the gantry #110 to allow the dryer
to pass behind the blocking in the wolf behind the W/D. The upper units should not be a
problem since the vent can drop dawn and doesn't have to pass behind the blacking.
4, Shower Curtain Rod Blocking.
Provide solid the 2 x 6 blocking at the end walls of the tub enclosures at outside edge of
shower where the god ends would be placed. Top of the blocking should be placed at 72""
AFF. (Nate: Please remember to insudate the delta 22 wars before installing the
sheathing on the backside.)
No. 15: The attached details wail clarify the construction of the corners of the gable and the raoFs
where they meet the soffits and the framing of the entry canopy soffits, See attached
details ASS -15-1 & ASI -15-2.
Na. 160 The attached drawings will give the elevations for the fence posts at the extreme east
end of the site. The elevations for the balance of the fence along the north side of the
site will follow as soon as possible. See attached drawing ASI -16-1.
No.. 1i: 1. The attached drawing shows elevations for the brick ledges at the brisk posts and the
wrought iron fence along the north side of the site. Drawing ASI -127-1 incorporates dwg.
ASS -1C-1 and corrects the elevation at the far eastern brick post. The fence follows a
straight slope along the north side of the site and is at a higher elevation than shown an
the construction documents. This reduces the amount of excavation, etc, at the fence
location. The fence has also been shortened by two posts and two wrought iron panels.
This is also a credit item to the project.
2. The concrete mow strip between the brick pasty will be set with the top at 6"" below
the brick ledge on the polis.
3. The sidewalk elevation will follow and be adjacent to the mow sfr;p. (6" below the
brick ledge at the posts)
4. The concrete foundations for the posts may rest on the existing lava rock. The lava
rock must be sound and solid. If the lava rock is above the tap of the post footing. The
concrete pier can utilize the lava rock in lieu of a footing. The vertical bars would than be
drilled and epoxied into the lava rock. The surface of the rock must be gleaned prior to
placing the concrete jest as where the building foundations rested directly on the rock.
Reviewed Sy:
Bret
L.
McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho,
City
of
Rexburg, JHS Architects, Gateman Ha1I
IL
V
ME PRO.POSAL REQUEST SU'MMARY
P.O. Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Architect; JHS Architects
Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc..
No., al; Provide an 18 inch HDPE culvert approximately 110 feet long at the existing grade in the
bottom of the existing barrow pit along 7' sough across the new entrance drive to the
Student Housing Project. The City of Rexburg will tie to this culvert when they reconstruct
7 t" South in the future.
No. az: Add approximately Z32 linear feet of HDPE storm drain line,, When the existing storm
drain line was excavated, it was determined that the end of it was not as detailed in
dwg. C4.1. The actual end of the existing storm line is located approx. 232 feet south
of SDM H # I . Con nect the new line to SD M H # 1 with a matching size of HDPE and
grade it at approx. 4.9°/0 as per PR#2,
Na. 03; Add a 12 inch diameter storm drain stub dine from SDMH #7 on dwg. C4,3 for possible
future developmeft. This new stub dine will extend 70 ft. from SDMH #7. extend the stub
from SDMH #7 at approx. 1°Ia grade and mark the end with a marker per detail M on
dwg. CS. I The invert at the end of the stub should be set at 4967.84, See attached
sketch.
No. d4: Modify the conduit system formerly intended for the telephone and CATV as shown on
the attached drawing. conduits will be stubbed -up in the location that were formerly
telephone and CATV pedestal locations, See attached sketch.
No. 05: defer to dwg. C4. 1 Change the culvert along Pt' South at the extreme west corner of the
site from a 15 inch diameter to a 18 inch diameter culvert. This culvert will be approx. 73
ft. long
Na. 06. Refer to dwg. C3.1 Delete the 4" water shut-off values that were to be 5 f#, from each
building. (16 valves - See addendum #2)
Provide (S) 4"" water shut-off Wares that are to be located within 3 ft. of point where the
building service lines connect to the water main line in the parking lots,.
No. Q7: Remove mass rock beneath Building #i4 as required to achieve proper building
elevation, the volume of rock has been measured and calculated by the Owner and
earthwork contractor representatives. the calculated volume of rock to be removed is
8015 cubic feet.
No. Q8: Revise the outside air grilles over the doors of the Utility closets at the center ked
units from 12"" X 12'r t. 18" x S". Refer to dwg. MIJ & M1.2 Plan Nate 7 and dwg. M2.I
Plan Note 4.
W
PROPOSAL R6
P.O. Box 143
ReAurgir ID 83441
20.8-757-9172
Project: BYU Idaha Student Family Housing
Project No.,a 03-0001
VEST SUMMARY
Architect: JHSArchitects
Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.,
A� 6 T f flKII.M lI� �.e}!T f ERF4 m3'�C h
No., D9: Change the closet, pantry., linen and washer/dryer closed shelving from fixed and
adjustable painted particle board to fixed and adjustable 3I4" melamine panel product
refinished shelving units as follows...
Closet 517elving, Refer to detail 4/A 10 m 3 . Provide 314" melamine paned product
verticals and shelving with 0.18"" PVC edge banding. Two top shelves should be
fixed, Five bottom shelves should be adjustable. Closed rods should he in two
section s with a "wall bracket"at each of the four ends. A 4"' toe kick should be
provided.
Pantry Shelving: Refer to detail 5 & 7/A10-3. Provide 3/a" melamine panel product
verticals and shelving with 0,18"'r PUC edge banding. Tap and bottom shelves
should be fixed and the dour intermediate shelves should be adjustable. Space at
the inside corners of the shelving must be usable and not boxed in.
Linen Closet Shelving. Refer to detail 6/A103. Provide3/4"" melamine panel
product verticals and shelves with 0.18"' PVC edge banding. The six shelves
should be adjustable. A 4" toe kick should be provided.
W3sherlDrYel-Shelving- Refer to detail 8/A10.3 and attached sketch PR -9-1.
Provide3/4"' melamine panel product verticals and shelves with 0.18"' PVC edge
banding. The shelving units should be a 12"" rectangular box with both shelves
fixed.
No. 10; 1, Provide a 4 ft. x 5 ft. louver at the soffit above the main stair at each of the sixteen
buildings. The louver mush include an insect screen and be refinished so that no painting
is required, installed per the attached details PR -10-1 8c PR -10-2 , and be Metal Aire
Series RHE -1 with insect screen or equal.
2. Provide six "tulle shell" vents at the rear center area of the roof of each of the sixteen
buildings. These will have to be "cut in" at the roofs to Bldg.#1 & Bldg.#2. Turtle shelf
vents should math the other vents an the roof or the dark brown valley meta.
No, 11: Delete the landscaping rock retaining wail at the northwest corner 4f the site from the
contract. The other rack retaining walls shalt remain in the contact and shall not be
affected by this change in work.
1. The rock materials that are currently on site will remain there for the Owner"s
use in constructing the northwest retaining waft after the construction of 2nd West
Street,, The reinforcing fabric and drain pipe required for the retaining wall will
also remain an site for the Owner's use.
Z. The brick material for the large masonry sign at the corner will be kepi on site
for the Owner to use in the futures that matching the brick wilt not be an issue.
F.
W
R,0- BOX
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
No 11: (Continued)
UEST SUMMARY
...=_...
Architect: JHS Architects
Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.
3. 1 he concrete for the base of the brick sign will be deleted from the Contract,
4, The berm of earth along the north west corner needs to be at the designed
height and then slope off to the north and west ata 3-1 slope over the area
where the regaining wall would have been. The 3:1 slope would run out until it
meets existing grade.
5. the landscaping would be modified as follows:
a. Delete 12 trees and 1+68 shrubs associated with the rock retaining
wall,
b. Extend the lawn dawn the 3;1 nope to a point were the future
sidewalk will occur.
6. The irrigation sprinkler system at the northwest corner will be modified.
a. Delete (12) TORO 570Z-PRX-6P-12. heads and associated piping.
b. Delete (26) TORO 570Z-PRX-6P.15 heads and associated piping.
c. Delete (49) TORO 5702-PRX-6P-10 heads and associated piping.
d. Delete (5) TORO 5707, -P -RX -4P,15 heads and associated piping.
e. Delete (8) TORO 5-70Z.PRX.4P,10 heads and associated piping.
f. Delete (5) TORO 5702-PRX-4P-4-EST heads and associated piping.
g. Delete (10) HUNTER I-20 heads and associated piping.
(Note: Cap the water lines that lead to the deleted areas at a location that will allow the
Owner to easily complete the north west turner area at a later time.)
Reviewed By: E3ret L. McGowan/President
CC: BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, JHS Architects, Bateman Hall
P.O. Box I43
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
UEST FOR INFORMATION SUMM.__ -1 -RY
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Page 1 of 7
Architect: JHS Architects
Contractor: Bateman -Mall Inc.
No. 01: Details 4 thru 8 on sheet A10.3 shelving to be installed as per RFI#I,,
41A10.3 Top shelf to be 1 ft, deep and fixed. 2nd from top - 2 ft, deep and fixed. Lower
8 in. deep and fixed.
51A10.3 All shelves to be 2 ft. deep and adjustable as drawn.
6/A10-3 All shelves to be full depth of closet and fixed with "cheats" on the wafts for
support.
7/A10-3 All shelves to be 1 ft. deep and adjUstabie as drawn.
8/A10-3 All shelves to be 1 ft, deep and adjustable on K1! vertical's and brackets,,
No. 02. All of the columns should have 3/16" thick walls. A cursory review of the toilet accessories
list attached to RFI -Z has been made. Without gong through each item, the Inst looks
complete This is not an approval of the list..,.. Only the results of our cursory review.
Na 03: Bldg.# 1, rock surfate in conflict with bottOM of footing elevation: Allow depth of footing
to decrease ( bottom of footing rises and top of fooling stays leve ) as the rock rises into
the footing area. The continuous reinforcing steel needs to rise and be approximately 2"
above the rock surFace. The rock surface needs to be cleaned off so that no loose earth
materials are between the rack and the new concrete....,. per Addendum #1
No. 04: Drawing A1.6 is correct, The east end of Bldg.#5 steps up 31- 8".
No. 05§ Drilling and epoxying the anchor bolts at the party wars over the floor stabs is
acceptable. Drilling and epnxying at the bald downs (PAHD42) is acceptable but may not
be easy because the PAHD4Zs are designed to be cast into the floor concrete., it would
also be acceptable to change to a different hold down such as LTT131 and then drill and
epoxy the anchor into the concrete sfab/faotFng. If there are any questions concerning
the fold downs..190make sure that answers are obtained before proceeding.
No. a+5: The closets at the rear of each building will be identified as Electrical or Communication
Closet by what the electrician pins into them. It does not make any difference to the,
design tears which is which.
No, 07: Windows, The nailing fin is tO be removed where the window are set dawn into the toy of
foundation walls. This would be similar to detail 14/A8.1- The manufacturers
representative indicates that screws through the window frame dawn into the concrete at
the sill may be needed. Install per rr�anufacturer's recommendations. The manufacturer's
representative indicates that the windows shouldb� �a���Ced yvith urethanE caulking.
Install per manufacturer's recommendations.
A
IF
�r�,
R0v Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
UEST FOR INFORMATION SUMMARY
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Page 2 of 7
Architect: QHS Architects
Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.
No. D8: Hold downs at the walls of the buildings above the foundat-Ion are only required at the
locations shown (HI -1s. etc.). The straps do not necessarily continue at all places when a
hold-down at the foundation occurs. Yes, the hurricane brackets from concrete to roof
are sown with delta HI symbol. MST 37's and MST 48's are also used in the area near
the stairs to the 3 story units.
No. 09: SP2"s at 16/1 o.c. revery stud) are requi�-ed at the delta X locations,, The plywood shear
walls (Crosshatched wars) need to be nailed per the Shear Wali Schedule too. An SPS at
each stud and a A35 at each outlovker are required.
No. 10: The stair landing and the stair stringers need to work as a sinrt
gly member sup oed h
the beams between the calumns. As the design of the stars proceeds., the stair desirsgne
need to involve a structural engineer per the specs.
No. 11: At building #3: There are three options available for the norm drain for this building.
A) The drain for the enure building could be tied to the catch basin to the southwest of
Bldg.#3.
8} The drainage for the upper end of the building could be tied to the stub from
SDMH#I. This stub is already installed:- The drainage for the lower end of the
building could be tied to the catch basin to the southwest of Bldgw#3.
C) The stub from SDMH#1 could be reinstalled at a lower elevation to allow the buildin
drain to be deep enough to meet the 3' of cover, g
At building #7: Rug the storm drain for this building to SDMH #3. The building drain
layout would be similar to a mirror image of building #5., The.invert of the drain stub
would be approximately 57-.5.
Na. 1Z: item #1. See attached details.
item #2., These columns only occur at building #12, TwO columns are required,
Item #3. The beam bearing elevation at the seat calculates at 108' - 1129/32"". This
must be verified by the genera! contractor. See drawing on sheet 2 of RFI#12,
No. 13: Diniensions for typical 2 BR floor plan, the string of dimensions in ue ion should be
revised as shown on the attached Sketch. The end dimensions are to the centerline of
the "parley wads'", The centerline of the party wra«s. Is typically the face of the plywood
shear sheathing.
No. 14: Residential sprinklers with orifice sizes of 7/f6" or 318f`are approved ashmee# �VFPA13RY
N
V
0 a a Lu-, i "`��, , a R E
P.O. Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
0
UEST FOR INFORMATION SUMMARY
Page 3 of 7
Project: NYU Idaho Student Family Housing Architect: JHS Architects
Project No.: 03-0001 Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.
Na 15. Bldgir#1 windows, concrete in window opening Gr' too low, Drill & epoxy (3) #4 bars into
the existing concrete sill and (1) #4 bar into each jam. At Sills: three evenly spiced - 8"
long with 4"" embedded into the existing foundation. At Jambs: 1 bar each jamb - 8"' fang
with 4"-' embedded into the existing foundation. Our primary concern is that the new sill
patch blend into the surrounding foundation as much as possible.
No. 16: The pipe sizes for Water Closets may meet the UPS for Water Closets in residential
construction, 3" toilet flanges may be used. The pipe sizes mush meet the UPC for the
designated type of construction,
No. 17: 7t1,�4�� . The ft. wAl [1f th krcaeiir�r..�
---------�U��wI��9� vv"".[ t:! ane rounaation is already in place
will have to be "ground out" a little to accommodate the vent pipe.
Item #2, On the subsequent buildings a small block-out should be added to the concrete
farms for that wall so that the went Ione can be accommodated. The block-out
could be a piece of half inch plywood or something similar.
No. 18: The reasonthat the dimensions on detail 3/A7.3 are noted " NOMINAL" is because the
plate, thicknesses, spud heights, joist heights and floor sheathing thicknesses is not known
exactly. E�_H, will provide exact dimensions of the various components. We recommend
that we wait until 131dg.#1 is. framed. Floor to floor = 97 1/8", HoOr tO roof = 109 1/8"d
Na. 19: City of Rexburg Fire Inspection, The pull stations were added by addendum. They reed
to be shown an the Fire Alarm System shop drawings. The Fire Alarm System can be
programmed by the installer however the dire Inspector wants it rnnrarnme e
detectors are clearly shown in the 2T unity on drawing. E3.1. Monitoring of smoke
defectors is not required, this item is not applicable. There is no gate at the entrances to
the project after construction is complete. Someone has, misread the drawings.
Node: the electrical engineer (Todd Payne] his discussed and reviewed these items. with
the Fire Inspectvr (Chris Huskinson} and Nelson Fire Stictyems on �1 May �003. The above
response is the outcome of those discussions.
No. zo. The attached drawings RFI -gyp -1 and RFI -20-2 realise the grades at the parking lot east of
Bldg.#8 & #11. The revision is required dui to the lack of adequate cover for the existing
storm drain line. This revision is required due to the lack of adequate cover for the
existing storm drain dine, The attached drawings adjust the finished parking lot grades to
provide the needed cover, A grade ring at SDMH#5 wiff have to be added. Please see
drawings RFI -20-1 and RFI -2Q.2 for details.
P.O. Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83940
208-757-9172
UEST FOR INFORMATION SUMMARY
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing Architect, JNS Architects
Project Na,: 03-0001Contractor; gateman -Hal! Inc.
No. 21: The Mooring contractor must have submitted incorrect installation information for the
sheet vin yi flooring. Submittal 1�9-1 refers tv heat welded seams or welding rods in at
least 16 places. Please have the flooring contractor submit the correct installation
information for the Commission Plus flooring and a sample of a cemicaliy welded seam
that we can review.
No. 22: Paul Jensen met with Val Christensen on 5/5/p3 and received approval to use the
existing anchor bolts for the PHD5 hold-downs. Cut off lower 16" on the king stud to gain
access to the existing halts, Assure that hold-down straps form above are nailed to the
(2) column studs (which are attached to the hold-down, device) and not the king stud,
This approval applies only to the first (3) buildings or to the extent the anchor bolts are
misplaced at this point in, time,,
No. Z3: The contractor/supplier for the framing chose to substitute the rim joist material for the
joists shown. This is fine except for the front wolf of the townhouses which are to be a
continuous drag strut. Other than the drag struts, the rim joists may have joints in them.
No. 24; The STC dips shown at detail 9/A10-2 need only be installed at roof trusses..
No., 25: GFI outlets at the stair landings should he 18" above the landing,
Es, the main entry switches should be at the latch side of the door.
Yes, the closet switch can move around the corner.
dight fixture at the Pantry may be ceiling mounted.
Gang the closet light switch with the bedroom light switch... -only occurs at the 2 "d
bedroom not the Master Bedroom.
Should add a single toggle switch at the nearest "side wall"to the range hood.. This.
would occur at 37 lower fever units'.
Microwave at accessible units will be located on countertop or a tenant furnished cart.
Fire alarm gong shall be located above the Utility Closet 107 at the rear of a townhouse
unit, see 3/A5.1
Light fixture heights... F15, Upper (approximately 17' above main floor) rear of
townhouse centered.
F14. Tap of fficture to be level with top of door frame.
F8, 4 ft,. back from main entry walk and 7 ft, above the stair riser,
Thi locations of the TV vutleis are OK as shown on the drawings.
The electrical panels in all units should be mounted at the standard height.
Four units on the project reed to be totally accessible. These are 2A units which are at
Building #7 (2), Building #S (t), and Building #12 The other dower level unitsnot
townhouses) need to be adaptable if the need arises,
�
V
INA
PsOm B%ONA1143
r%
Kexburg, M 83440
208-757-9172
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Page 5 of 7
Architectu JHS Architects
ContractorAg Bateman -Hall Inc.
Na. 25. (Cont) The light flxture in Pantry 102, at the townhouse units needs to be changed to a
2' fixture due to the sloped ceiling under the stair.
1.41
No. Z6: Smoke detectors ars only required in the bedrooms and jest outside bedrooms. Smoke
defectors are not required at the Vt floor of the: townhouses. Revised The architectural
Reflected CejJ169"PlaTSn. drawing A2_1 shows smoke r detect
townhouse units. The electrical drawings°�"�� bottom level o� the
refer to the architectural for quantities and
location,
No. 27: Duca work penetrations at b22 vyall, Drop the duck work below the double plate.. this will
result in the ceiling being 3 inches lower in the area were the ductwork occurs. Refer
to attached sketch RFI#27,,
No. 28.- After reviewing the entire situation with the ductwork and the efectrieal panel and the
available space at the bottom of the stair; we feel that it is best to locate the electrical
panel at the townhouses behind the door in the small bedroom an the upper floor, This
will allow the dint to turn while in the toilet room and not be above the panel.
No. 29. Drawing A3.3 is correct. Delete the delta 44 symbol at the wolfs between the 2BR units
and the townhouses, The delta 4 wail occurs at hath sues an the lower leve! only.
Y
Na. 30: Utilize H1 1Z brackets when possible.. Use (2) H71s, one on each side, at the 2 or 3
trusses an Buildings #1 & #2 where the H1 1Z'$ won't work.
No. 31: At the delta 22 shear wall behind the Utility Closets, the hold-down should be delta H10.
The hold-down strap is CM 12 90"+. Delta H10 applies to hold-down devices from
foundation tO top of top wall. 1110 is a hold-down at perimeter of roof holding trusses to
the wall.
No. 32: Use HU7MAX bracket at the ends of the g4 beams that bear on the building wall. The 134
beams are 7 1/2" high and the 137 beam is g" high. This will only be a problem if a truss
happens to fall right above the! B7 beam.
No. 33= The attached drawing RFI -33-1 revises the grades at the parking lot at the southeast
corner of the site.. This revision is required due to the lack of adequate cover dor the
existing storm drain dine. The attached drawing adjusts the finished parking lot grades to
provide the caner at the corner of the site. Thee grades and elevations in front of Build Ing s
#16 &. #12 all shay as indicated in the construction documents. See attached drawing
RFT -33-1 for details.
1-4
W
P. 0 . Box 143
Rexburg., ID 83440
208-757-9172
Project: BYU Idaho Student Family Housing
Project No.: 03-0001
Page fi of 7
Architect: QHS Architects
Contractor; Bateman. -Hall Inc,
No, 34: The F5 fan/light units need to remain in the project, The exhaust dans at the toilet rooms
shown on the mechanical plans can be deleted. Please provide a detailed cost proposal
dor deleting (52) EF -1 fans and (155) Ef-2 dans.
No. 35: 1. Refer to ASI -14 for the first issue of this RFL
Z. The 2f]00 IMC -504-6-.1 allows 25' fess 5' for each 90 degree elbow. The dryer vent
outlet is approximately 8' up and 10' out from the dryer location. Even with the
elbows, it should be below the 25' limit.
No. 36: Please refer to letter dated 15 August 2003. See attached tetter dated 15 august 2003
regarding RFI #36, BYU of Idaho Family, Housing.
No. 37: Relocate dryer vent to the exterior wolf and adjust framing as required to accommodate
fire rating between units.
No. 38: the wrought iron and brick pier fence will follow the slope of grade. The wrought iron
fence panels will be "trapezoids" rather than "rectangles". The rough grading should be
done in accordance with the addendum drawings (Addendum #1), The tops of the
concrete foundations for the brick piers should be 4,"Fto 51'r above the finished grade -
tYPically. The area near the rawer pole at approximately the center of the site along 7ffi
South will need to be adjusted to protect the pole.
No. 39m- Although i haven't seen the Almond calor handles and edge banding.,..,.. Ken and I
agreed over the phone that the Almond color would probably be tie best edge banding
and handle color. RFI -3g indicates that a re -submittal has been received. ,As of now, i
have not received it.
No. 40: Item #1. Lintels to have 8" bearing. No attachment to the building.
Item #2. "Tyvek" Wrap to overlap lintels.
Item #3. Colorof brick at rear of townhouse mechanical room to be brick color #2 and
the brick feature to he brick color #1,
Na. 41: item #1. The brick color at the elect rica!/communication claret to be brick color #1 (Dark
Back).
Idem #2. There needs to be a moulding at the transition between brick and stucco at the
header on electrical/communication closet.
14
P.0% Box 143
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-757-9172
UEST FOR INFORMATION SUMMARY
Page 7 of 7
Project; 6YU Idaho Student Family Housing Architect: JHS Architects
Project No,,,, 03-0401 Contractor: Bateman -Hall Inc.
No. 42: The feature relied at the rear Mechanical Rooms will be aceamplished W1th additi
onal
layers of sheathing prior to application of stucco. Refer to attached drawing RFI -42-1 for
relief depths. The wall plane directly mound the door frame will be at 011r. The arch and
the plane around the firs alarm device will be at 1/2"r out. The column faces will be at 1rf
out. Provide control joint and tooted Joints as noted on attached drawing RFI -42-1. See
attached drawing RFI -42-1 for details,,
Reviewed By; Beet L. McGowan/President
CC; BYU Idaho, City of Rexburg, JHS Architects, Bateman Hall