HomeMy WebLinkAboutWRITTEN RESPONSE - 05-00163 - Comp. Plan Map Amend. - 4 AreasSugar City Planning and Zoning Commission
10 West Center • P.O. Box 56
Sugar City, Idaho 83448
Phone (208) 356-7561 • Fax (208) 359-2654
www.sugarcity.net
TO: The Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission
REGARDING: Area 1 of the proposed Rexburg Comprehensive Plan Map
Development of the property at the north Rexburg interchange will have an immediate
and far-reaching impact on the Sugar City/Salem area. We ask the Rexburg Planning and
Zoning Commission to deny the proposed change to the comprehensive plan map as it
relates to this area. Sugar City is opposed to having Rexburg move into the core of our
community. Negotiation between the two cities is required before this area can be
properly designated.
Thank you,
Sugar City Planning and Zoning Commission
Sharee Palmer, Chairman
DATE: July 6, 2005
TO: Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Home and Property Owners on Harvard Ave. South 2nd East,
East 2nd South, and East I" South.
SUBJECT: Gary and Bonnie Anderson Re -Zoning Proposal
As a community of neighbors living next to the 1.7 acres of vacant land owned by Gary
and Bonnie Anderson we would like to support Anderson's in their goal to develop this
long vacant property. However, we believe their proposal for professional/medical
offices presents only one option to the development of the neighborhood at large and we
believe other options and variations should also be considered.
We suggest that the block under consideration is larger than Anderson's 1.7 acres and the
re -zoning has an effect on many people and the homes in which they reside. As a
community of neighbors collectively owning twice as much of the block as Andersons, it
is our suggestion that the block be re -zoned from Low Density Residential 2 (LDR 2) to
Mixed Use with the following zoning restrictions which are more likely to protect our
property values as allowed under the Project Redevelopment Option:
1. NO NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT. That means NO
convenience stores, bakeries, doughnut shops, drug stores, florists, barber
shops, dry cleaners, etc. as allowed under a typical Mixed Use "Neighborhood
Business District".
2. NO restaurants, pharmacies, second hand stores, photography studios,
mortuaries, wedding chapels or reception centers as currently allowed under
the Professional Office zoning.
3. CREATE A PROJECT REDEVELOPMENT ZONE. It is suggested that
this block be allowed to be redeveloped with a density somewhere between
LDR2 and LDR3 into a relatively high end patio home/condominium
community with a specified overall green space and controlled access
avoiding South 2"d East. This redevelopment zone could be targeted at
seniors, "empty nesters", and other individuals who desire a nice home with
little upkeep and simplified living close to the BYU-Idaho campus,
downtown, and near to professional services. It is strongly recommended that
this redevelopment NOT be targeted as low end or typical student housing.
We believe this option better meets the needs of our neighborhood and would be a nice
residential addition to the City of Rexburg. It would promote downtown business and
professional office patronage.
We believe that there is a need for this type of neighborhood housing in Rexburg which is
currently unmet. As the community and the University grow, the options for faculty
housing and retirement housing need to expand. This is ideal property for this type of
development.
We believe that there is already an overabundance of ixE3se zorring-in Rexburg that
is undeveloped and/or underdeveloped. There is no need to create additional
"unfinished" zoning of this type in this town.
With the number of empty professional offices available in Rexburg and the expansion of
the hospital to include additional professional office space, there is little or no apparent
need to allow this property to be set aside for even more professional office space.
Thank you for considering our proposal and recommendations to make Rexburg a better
place to live and work.
Ralph M. Kern —158 Harvard Ave.
i�
2. James Smith —123 Harvard Ave.
3. Blair Fisher — Harvard Ave.
4. Boyd Weatherston — Harvard Ave.
5. Steve Herdti - South 2nd East ,-
6. Jerome Barrick — South 2"d East
7. Doris Groot — East 151 South W V� I ' j1 oov
8. Sid Muir— East 15" South jzi f'}3,+„
9. Jack Harrell —East 15` South
10. Doralie Gambles —East l sc South
11. Sandra Thomason — South 2"d East
12. Dave Taylor — East 2"d South
u c, �YR r no PY�lssldtl e I 6i pli 45
IV m(& beto %
13. Scott Samuelson —East 2"d South
14. Ron Messer—East 2"d South
15. Tom Thornton — East 2"d South � .4
16. Darracq — East 2"d South
37 South
Third East
Rexburg, ID
83440
Officers
Don Sparhawk
President
356-6781
Pat Hinton
Vice President
359-9064
Jean Baird
Secretary -
Treasurer
356-3620
East Main
Neighborhood Association
Representing homeowners from First North to Second South & Second East to Ash
July 7, 2005
Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission
Rexburg City Hall
Rexburg, ID 83440
Dear Commission Members,
The members of the East Main Neighborhood Association wish to express
our vision for the future of our neighborhood. Both Changes 3 and 4 to the
Comprehensive Plan fall within the boundaries of our neighborhood
association and these proposals have many of the residents very concerned
about the future of our residential area. Currently, all of the area in question
is zoned Low Density Residential 2, which provides basic protection for us
as a residential neighborhood.
Proposed Change #3
The association has divided this proposal into two areas. The first area
includes LaRae Clarke's and the late Keith Grover's homes on East Main
Street. The association believes these two homes are an integral part of the
residential neighborhood east of Professional Plaza. We are united in our
belief that these historic homes should be retained as low density residential.
If these homes were ever to become commercialized in any way, we believe
this would begin the commercialization of this entire residential area.
The second and larger area including many residential homes west of
Professional Plaza is made more complicated because seven of these homes
have already been purchased by Drs. Lovell, Lofgran and Smith for the
purpose of additional offices and parking. If these doctors had not already
bought these homes, this area would not even be considered for anything
else but residential. Currently, this area has very well kept homes, and is
conveniently located close to downtown Rexburg. Although some people
have sold their homes to doctors, there are still homeowners who desire to
live in this fine residential neighborhood. After much discussion about our
vision for this area, our association recommends that the area be kept as
Residential on the comprehensive plan map. We propose that the city move
very slowly in changing the nature of this area. We would like the city to
wait five to ten years and then take a look at the needs of this area. In the
meantime, we recommend that the city study parking and traffic issues that could arise if any
changes were made to this area.
Proposed Change #4
The proposed change to an entire half block between First and Second South should be of great
concern to the entire city. This could begin a dramatic change along South Second East, a very
attractive tree -lined street that leads to the university and eventually to a beautiful temple that
will be situated only a few blocks to the south. We believe that with the addition of a temple, this
older residential area will become an even more desirable place for people to live. At the same
time, we recognize increased traffic along Second East and know some homeowners would like
other options for their property.
Therefore, it is our recommendation that this area be kept residential in nature. We definitely do
not desire any commercialization or retail businesses that would be allowed in a Neighborhood
Business District (which is allowed in a Mixed Use area). We also do not believe this is a good
area for additional higher density student housing.
Instead, our vision for this area is for it remain a residential neighborhood. We would like to see
this area retain single family homes, but we also believe it would be an ideal location for patio
homes and condominiums that would be especially attractive to older families and retirees. We
would like to see strict controls on what is allowed in this residential area and would like to see
some architectural controls to ensure that new development blends into the existing landscape.
We also would like to remind the commission that the Project Redevelopment Option (Pro Zona)
is already allowed in this area. We believe this could be a tool that is already in place to help the
Anderson family and others develop their property, while at the same time protecting the existing
neighborhood and entire city.
Conclusion
Our vision for the future of our neighborhood is for it to remain much the way it is today. We
already have a good balance of homes and professional offices. This area is one of the best
maintained older neighborhoods in the city and we have permanent homeowners who wish to
live here for many years to come.
We appreciate the support that you have given to our neighborhood in the past, and hope you can
help us protect this area from the pressure of economic development that is all around us. While
we are supportive of the business and medical community, we believe there are proper places for
both.
We ask for your continued help in protecting our neighborhood, as well as the future of a very
large residential area that lays south and east of downtown Rexburg.
Sincerely,
Don Spare
President