HomeMy WebLinkAboutNorth Central Urban Renewal Plan Correspondence - David B. KlinglerI
Written Testimony of
David B. Klingler residing at 25 East Moran View Road, Rexburg, Idaho 83440
For Public Hearing about NORTH CENTRAL URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
To be held Wednesdav, November 18, 2020
1. A new way needs to be devised for notification of Citizens affected by
public works. Publication in the newspaper does not adequately inform the
public of Public Notices when a majority of the public does not subscribe to
the publication. Property owners in the affected area should be notified by
mail and this should be proposed and enacted by new law.
2. The residents affected by the NORTH CENTRAL URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
were not able to vote for the public officials enforcing implementation of
this public works project. The Rexburg Urban Renewal Agency is a private
organization in which the citizens could not vote for the management.
Those affected could only vote for the Madison County Commissioners and
it is not stipulated how they play a part in this project.
3. Citizens DO NOT want to receive bills from the City of Rexburg for City
Fees, Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Utility Changes, Water, and Sewer hook-up at
the completion of the NORTH CENTRAL URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT!
4. Disappointment that the plan was not published and available for review
prior to the hearing.
5. Using only the newspaper publication of the NORTH CENTRAL URBAN
RENEWAL PROJECT points A to V of the plan proposal is the following
commentary on those points:
A. Storm Drains means residents will have to pay for curb and gutter.
B. Buy Rights of way or if not possible condemn land and take from land
owner.
C. 5t" West Bridge and Hibbard US 20 Overpass to Moody Road Major traffic
problems for land owners and this only benefits the business Walmart.
D. Public utilities of water and sewer installed and burying of current utilities
of power, gas, fiber optic cable, cable television, along with covering
existing ditches and canals. What will be the cost to land owners for
burying utilities to their properties?!
E. Additional provision for "street scapes" including plazas, benches, bike
racks, and works of public art. Some of these items should be donated by
private citizens, businesses, or industry—NOT publicly funded! This
"street scaping" must refer to what happened to the now parking lot
formerly known as Center Street. That project was only supposed to cost
$400,000 but ended up costing $1.75 MILLION DollarsM The extra $1.3
MILLION Dollars was WASTED on STREET SOAPING!!!! This money would
have paid for 43 resident land owners to have sidewalk, curb, gutter, and
be hooked into citv water and sewer!!! How much is currently spent on
landscape maintenance and fire pillars for this ONE BLOCK SECTION of
City Street that is now a parking lot with fewer spaces than prior to
remodel?M This money could be better spent to repair roads in town
and remove snow in the winter!!!!
F. Once again need to acquire property and condemn if necessary taking
from land owners who may choose not to participate in the project.
G. Property for Street Scapes and underground utilities. Will this be extra
property acquired by purchase or condemned from land owners?
H. After acquisition, the need to sell unnecessary property not used in the
project. Where will these funds be accounted for?
I. Demolition of buildings for rights of way and public health and safety.
How will this impact current land owners who have farm related
buildings?
J. Management of properties acquired for the project by renting, gifting, or
selling. How will this be administered and buy whom and where will the
funds be accounted for?
K. Development of lands for private enterprise and to attract businesses to
our area. This is essentially bribing companies to come here! If there is
money for this—there can be money provided that land owner residents
DO NOT PAY FOR ANY CITY IMPROVEMENTS AFFECTING THEIR
PROPERTIES!!!
L. Construction of 5th West Bridge and Moody Road US 20 Overpass. How
much money will each of these projects cost? How involved will the state
of Idaho Transportation Department be with construction on US 20 and
will additional state funding contribute to this work?
M. Municipal buildings in the area. Will there be a new fire station or police
station or city annex building in the area? Is there a need for this?
N. Again a provision to bride businesses to come to the area. This money
could pay for improvements so that LAND OWNERS ARE NOT BILLED TO
BECOME PART OF THE CITY OF REXBURGM
0. Financing of housing subdivisions. if provision is made for new
subdivisions to have curb, gutter, sidewalk, sewer, and water—money can
also be SPENT FOR CURRENT LAND OWNER RESIDENTS TO NOW HAVE TO
PAY FOR THESE SERVICES.
P. Rehabilitation of current owner properties and structures. This indicates
that current land owners will be required to put in sidewalks, curbs,
gutters, and hook into city water and sewer. WHO WILL PAY THE COST
FOR THIS? THE PROJECT OR PRIVATE LAND OWNER INDIVIDUALS?
Q. Prepare commercial sites for business. Once again if money is to be spent
for businesses who come to the area so that they do not have to pay for
sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and hook into city water and sewer or road
paving—then MONEY CAN PAY FOR THE SAME SERVICES FOR THE
CURRENT RESIDENT LAND OWNERS IN THE PROJECT AREA!
R. Zoning for public parks and spaces. While this is nice and necessary—
please see above point E. that public money should not be wastes for
extremes, luxuries, and extravagances!!!! Private business and citizens
should be invited to help fund "park scaping"!
S. City funding of design and resources for the project. How much is the
total projected cost of this project? One document that was reviewed
indicated $582 MILLION Dollars? This is a half a BILLION Dollars in today's
value. How much more will be needed to complete the project in the
future?!
T. Lend or give funds for development. Once again if money can be
available for inviting commerce to the area—it can PAY FOR THE
4
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CURRENT RESIDENT LAND
OWNERS IN THE PROJECT AREA!
U. Relocation of displaced residents because of the project. How many
residents will this affect? Will they be given appropriate compensation
for their displacement?
V. Improvements shown in Attachment 5????? The published plan was not
available for review—so there is no indication of what Attachment 5
shows or tells and—THIS REMAINS INFORMATION NOT DISCLOSED TO
CITIZENS!
FINALLY, WHEN THE AREA IS ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF REXBURG—WILL SNOW
REMOVAL AND MOSQUITO ABATEMENT BE MAINTAINED AT THE SAME LEVEL,
AS CURRENTLY PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT AREA BY MADISON COUNTY???!!!
As seen from past history of city management of these services, residents feel
that we will not receive these needed services in the future!!!
IF LEGAL DOCUMENTATION CAN BE GIVEN TO EACH LAND OWNER RESIDENT
AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT THAT THEY WILL NOT RECEIVE A BILL AND BE
FORCED TO PAY FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR
PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THE NORTH CENTRAL URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT—AND
AFTER GIVEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS AND UP FRONT DISCLOSURE OF HOW
THE PROJECT WILL AFFECT THE CITIZENS IN THE PROJECT AREA— THEN
CONSIDERATION COULD POSSIBLY BE GIVEN FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTENTION.
David B. Klingler