HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - 08-00064 - Preliminary Master Plan for PUD - SummerfieldSUMMERFIELD PUD
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
April 10, 2008
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ....................... :........................................... 3
Purpose of Report and Study Objectives..................................................................................3
ExecutiveSummary.................................................................................................................3
I PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................
5
SiteLocation............................................................................................................................5
LandUse.................................................................................................................................5
SitePlan and Access................................................................................................................5
StudyArea...............................................................................................................................7
LandUse.................................................................................................................................9
SiteAccessibility.....................................................................................................................9
I ANALYSIS OF 2008 CONDITIONS....................................................................
9
ExistingVolumes.....................................................................................................................9
Study Intersection Level of Service........................................................................................10
EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................................10
TRAFFIC.......................................................................................12
lPROJECTED
Project Site Traffic Forecasts.................................................................................................12
Off -Site Future Background Traffic......................................................................15
SchoolTraffic Forecasts........................................................................................................15
Senior Housing Traffic Forecasts...........................................................................................16
TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS..................................................17
2020 Level of Service............................................................................................................17
2025 Level of Service............................................................................................................20
Mitigations............................................................................................................23
2000 West/University Blvd Trip Distribution.......................................................25
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................26
APPENDIX..........................................................................................................28
HORROCKS
Ihll
F v 0 1 N e e K s Page I of 28
1
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
List of Figures
LOS — Unsignalized Intersections Criteria..................................................................10
Figure1:
Site Location ...............................................................................................................5
Figure2:
Site Plan......................................................................................................................6
l
Figure 3:
2000 West and Highway 33.........................................................................................7
Figure 4:
2000 West and 1000 South..........................................................................................7
Figure 5:
2000 West and University Blvd....................................................................................8
Figure 6:
3000 West and 1000 South..........................................................................................8
Figure 7:
Studied Intersections...................................................................................................9
20
Figure 8:
2008 Existing Volumes..............................................................................................11
Figure 9:
Project Trip Distribution-Percent..............................................................................13
23
Figure 10:
Project Trip Distribution-Volume............................................................................14
23
Figure 11:
School Trip Distribution..........................................................................................16
Figure 12:
Senior Adult Housing Distribution-Percent.............................................................17
Figure 13:
2020 Traffic Volumes without Project......................................................................18
Figure 14:
2020 Traffic Volumes with Project..........................................................................19
Figure 15:
2025 Traffic Volumes without Project......................................................................21
Figure 16:
2025 Traffic Volumes with Project..........................................................................22
Figure 17:
2000 West/University Blvd Trip Distributions..........................................................26
List of Tables
Table 1:
LOS — Unsignalized Intersections Criteria..................................................................10
Table 2:
LOS —Signalized Intersections Criteria.......................................................................10
Table 3:
2007 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour Without Project .........................1
l
Table 4:
2007 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour Without Project ..........................12
Table 5:
ITE Trip Generation Site Summary............................................................................12
Table 6:
ITE Trip Generation School Summary........................................................................15
Table 7:
ITE Trip Generation Senior Housing Summary..........................................................16
Table 8:
2020 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour With and Without Project ..........
20
Table 9:
2020 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour With and Without Project ..........20
Table 10:
2025 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour With and Without Project ........
23
Table 11:
2025 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour With and Without Project .........
23
Table 12:
2020 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour Mitigations..............................24
Table 13:
2020 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour Mitigations..............................24
Table 14:
2025 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour Mitigations..............................25
Table 15:
2025 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour Mitigations..............................25
HORROCKS
11-11
i V G I N F. E R S
Page 2 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
Purpose of Report and Study Objectives
The purpose of this traffic study is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the proposed
Summerfield development on the existing road network. The study objectives are to describe the
development, define the study intersections, estimate trip generation and distribution for the site
and adjacent developments, analyze 2008, 2020 and 2025 AM and PM peak traffic conditions,
describe the traffic impacts of the site under 2008, 2020 and 2025 conditions and recommend
improvements to mitigate traffic impacts.
Executive Summary
Site Location and Study Area. The Summerfield development is planned to be located between
Highway 33 and 1000 South on 2000 West in southwest Rexburg, Idaho. The study
intersections include 2000 West/Highway 33, 2000 West/1000 South, 2000 West/University
Blvd, 3000 West/1000 South, as well as the project accesses.
Development Description. The Summerfield development consists of 505 single family units.
The surrounding land uses consist of scattered single family homes and agricultural land. The
site proposes three project accesses, one on 2000 West and two on 1000 South.
Principal Findings. At build -out, the Summerfield is expected to generate an average of 4,613
new daily weekday trips with 363 during the AM peak hour and 460 during the PM peak hour.
The future planned High School and Elementary School in the area are expected to generate an
average of 1,192 vehicle trips in the AM peak hour. The future senior housing development is
expected to generate an average of 1,180 new daily weekday trips with 61 during the AM peak
hour and 95 during the PM peak hour
Without the project, the studied intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better.
By the year 2025 with the project traffic and the Elementary School and High School traffic the
intersections will operate at acceptable LOS C or better, except the intersection of 2000
West/School Back Access will operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour.
Conclusions and Recommendations. The roadway and intersection improvements listed below
will substantially mitigate the impacts and provide adequate traffic safety and operations for the
roadway network. The following mitigations are recommended:
1.) The intersection of 2000 West/1000 South should be reconstructed with a separate left
turn and shared thru-right turn lane in the eastbound and northbound approaches. The
southbound approach should be reconstructed with separate left turn lane, thru lane, and
right turn lane.
HORROCKS
11-11
I`° 1 u r r 1z ' Page 3 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Tragic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
i
2.) As recommended in the Madison School District Traffic Impact Study, the intersection of
i 2000 West/University Blvd should be reconstructed as a signal or a single lane
roundabout. The intersection does not warrant a signal for peak hour traffic, but may
meet the school crossing warrant. A roundabout will continue to promote traffic calming
for the area around the High School. The Summerfield project contributes 14 percent of
I the trips using the intersection.
I 3.) The intersection of 2000 West/School Back Access should be constructed with a separate
northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane.
4.) The intersection of 2000 West/Access #1 should be constructed with a separate
northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane.
5.) The intersections of 1000 South/Access #2 and 1000 South/Access #3 should be
constructed with separate westbound right turn lanes.
i
HORROCKS
L\ (i I\ H li R S
Page 4 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Location
The Summerfield development is planned to be located between Highway 33 and 1000 South on
2000 West in Rexburg, Idaho (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Site Location
Land Use
The proposed development consists of 505 units of single family homes. The adjacent land use
consists of scattered single family homes and agricultural land with a future High School and
Elementary School to the south.
Site Plan and Access
The site proposes one access on 2000 West and two accesses on 1000 South (see Figure 2).
HORROCKS
Ihll
Page 5 of 28
Figure 2: Site Plan
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Offsite Senior Adult a c
Housing
43 Acers
5-6 unitslacre
it
11, mfe ii L :1
IF !1 is 111
rt waww�x �
mnw.o_un.
O
OV
N
1000 South
1,500' W 2,300'
4 , Project Access
The accesses on 1000 South are spaced approximately 1,500 feet apart. Access #1 on 2000 West
is approximately 1,500 feet north of the existing intersection of 2000 West/1000 South.
HORROCKS
11-11
E N (i I\ E Ii R s
Page 6 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Study Area
The intersections studied for this report were:
—,� ---�- 2000 West and Highway 33: This is a
signalized four legged intersection. Highway
33 is a two lane road with separate left, thru and
right turn lanes. 2000 West is a two lane road
with one left turn lane and one shared thru-right
turn lane in each direction.
Figure 3: 2000 West and Highway 33
2000 West and 1000 South: This is a four '
legged un -signalized intersection. Currently
the eastbound approach is under
construction. 2000 West is a two lane road
with one shared left-thru-right lane. 1000
South is a stop -controlled two lane road
with one shared left-thru-right lane.
HORROCKS
Ibll
r r; i c r P
Figure 4: 2000 West and 1000 South
Page 7 of 28
Figure 5: 2000 West and University Blvd
3000 West and 1000 South: This is a four
legged un -signalized intersection. 3000
West is a stop -controlled two lane road with
a shared left-thru-right turn lane. 1000
South is a two lane road with a shared left-
thru-right turn lane.
H O RRO C K S
Irn
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
2000 West and University Blvd: This is
a three legged un -signalized intersection.
2000 West is a two lane road with one
shared left-thru lane in the northbound
direction and one shared thru-right lane in
the southbound direction. University
Blvd is a stop -controlled two lane road
with a separate left turn lane and right
turn lane.
Figure 6: 3000 West and 1000 South
Page 8 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
The studied intersections are shown in Figure 7, below.
Existing Intersection "F", 6 75
Project Access
..`.......0 ? E:
7
r 3;
Figure 7: Studied Intersections
Land Use
Currently the area around the proposed Summerfield development is largely agricultural with
scattered single family homes.
Site Accessibility
As shown in Figure 7, the proposed development will have one project access on 2000 West and
two project accesses on 1000 South. 2000 West runs north/south and provides connections to
Highway 33 and University Blvd.
ANALYSIS OF 2008 CONDITIONS
Existing Volumes
Traffic counts for the AM and PM peak hour were performed for the study intersections on
March 26 — April 3, 2008. This count data can be found in the Appendix.
HORROCKS
Inn
P. N G I v 1 IL R 9
Page 9 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Study Intersection Level of Service
Level of Service (LOS) is a term used by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) to describe the
traffic operations of an intersection, based on congestion and delay. LOS ranges from A (almost
no congestion or delay) to F (traffic demand is above capacity and the intersection experiences
long queues and delay). LOS C is generally considered acceptable for rural intersections. LOS
D is acceptable for urbanized intersections. LOS E is the threshold when the intersection reaches
capacity. Table 1 summarizes LOS delay criteria for stop controlled movements at unsignalized
intersections. Table 2 summarizes LOS delay criteria for signalized intersections.
Table 1: LOS — Unsignalized Intersections Criteria
Level of Service
Average Control delay (s/veh)
A
<10
B
>10-15
C
>15-25
D
>25-35
E
>35-50
F
> 50
Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000, Transportation Research Board
National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2000.
Table 2: LOS —Signalized Intersections Criteria
Level of Service
Average Control delay (s/veh)
A
<10
B
>10-20
C
>20-35
D
> 35- 55
E
>55-80
F
> 80
Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCH) 2000, Transportation Research Board
National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2000.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
For this report, the LOS for each intersection was calculated using the Synchro/SimTraffic 7
software package. The following table summarizes the existing conditions LOS for the study
intersections during the AM and PM peak traffic hours. The volumes are shown in the following
figure.
I
HORROCKS
I �% ° I 'N I` Ito ' Page 10 of 28
�1
XX AM PEAK HOUR
XX PM PEAK HOUR
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
4 ST 4ZT f. o
z0z0 mp
d l 1. r s tt�3e3
Figure 8: 2008 Existing Volumes
Table 3: 2007 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour Without Project
Intersection
Delay (seelveh)
LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
8.3
A
2000 West/1000 South*
2.7
A
2000 West/University Blvd*
3.3
A
3000 West/1000 South*
4.1
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
HORROCKS
Ildl
Ir- N G I N t: G R S
Page I I of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Table 4: 2007 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour Without Project
Intersection
Delay (seelveh)
LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
8.0
A
2000 West/1000 South*
3.4
A
2000 West/University Blvd*
3.5
A
3000 West/1000 South*
4.8
A
*unstgnaltzed intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
Currently, all of the study intersections operate at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours.
PROJECTED TRAFFIC
Project Site Traffic Forecasts
Trip Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation manual, 7th
Edition was used to calculate new trip volumes. The following table summarizes the results of
the trip generation for the proposed Summerfield development:
'able 5: ITE Trio Generation Site Summar
Weekday Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour
Variable Quantitv Dail Tris Total In Out Total In Out
jingle Family Detached Housing (210) 25% 75% 63% 37%
Dwelling Units 505 T 4.613 363 91 272 460 290 170
As shown, the proposed development is expected to generate an average of 4,613 new daily
weekday trips with 363 during the AM peak hour and 460 during the PM peak hour.
Trip Distribution. The trip distribution was calculated based on the existing traffic counts and
assumed travel paths. The trip distribution and PM peak hour project traffic volumes are shown
in Figures 9 and 10.
HORROCKS
o�n
Page 12 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Figure 9: Project Trip Distribution -Percent.
HORROCKS
11,11
L : N G 1�\ I E R';
Page 13 of 28
XX AM PEAK HOUR
XX PM PEAK HOUR
Project Area
!" 95
,i 06
4. L N o0
y Vm
Figure 10: Project Trip Distribution -Volume.
HORROCKS
11-11
F N Ci IN F 12 K
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Iti
?7 122
17 76
09 6r
91 z
J
�J
"1 i
�°'
66
1293
m9f
9E
Z�
3854
1
N�
�w J
11
�
bw
'^ '?
�a 38
II �,p,33
Page 14 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Off -Site Future Background Traffic
School Traffic Forecasts
Trip Generation. The following table summarizes the results of the trip generation for the
adjacent development based on the Madison School District Traffic Report:
Table 6: ITE Trip Generation School Summary
Variable
Vehicle
Trip Factor
Vehicle
Tris
AM
I Inbound
AM
Outbound
Future High School Enrolment 1200 Faculty 120
Parking Permits 1.1
730
730
0
Bus 40
6
6
0
Walk (Local) -
-
-
-
Faculty 1
120
120
0
Drop Off 1.1
150
150
150
Future Elementary School
Enrolment 400 Faculty 30
Bus 40
6
6
6
Faculty 1
30
30
0
Drop Off 1.1
150
150
150
Total -
1,192
1,192
306
As shown, the adjacent development is expected to generate an average of 1,192 trips during the
AM peak hour.
HORROCKS
Page 15 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
rl
X22%
Elementary Sch >I
High School
I Sb�
Figure 11: School Trip Distribution.
Senior Housing Traffic Forecasts
The following table summarizes the trip generation for the senior adult housing project located in
the northeast corner of the site; this project will be constructed under a separate developer. This
project will connect to Access #1 of the Summerfield project and thus will not be built until after
the access is constructed.
Table 7: ITE Trip Generation Senior Housing Summary
Variable
Quantity
Weekday
Weekday AM Peak Hour
Weekday PM Peak Hour
Daily Tris Total I In Out
Total In Out
Senior Adult Housing (251)
1 38% 62%
1 61% 39%
Dwelling Units 1 250
1,180
611 23 38
95 1 58 37
As shown, the senior housing development is expected to generate an average of 1,180 new daily
weekday trips with 61 during the AM peak hour and 95 during the PM peak hour.
HORROCKS
Irn
K v CI I\ I P. R S
Page 16 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Figure 12: Senior Adult Housing Distribution -Percent
TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS
2020 Level of Service
The rate for traffic growth to 2020 was assumed to be 1.7 percent. This growth was based on
output from the traffic model developed for the Madison County Transportation Plan and the
Madison School District Traffic Study. Traffic growth was determined by comparing model
output for the Base 2004 conditions with the 20 -year forecast. An average of the area was used.
The traffic volumes in 2020 without the project are shown in the figure below.
HORROCKS
1141
Page 17 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
S OZ OSS L�
XX AM PEAK HOUR 50808
«84
XX PM PEAK HOUR J 1 4
NN,
�o
rag
'Iir
2328 168
6050 130
S OT S
S S ZEI
J 11.
L n2 01 090E
no 6ZSZZ0-�
r J 11.
L -'
r-Oo
sir s�
�I
NP" 1
oY
2 73 11
019031
mg
OT 09001%.
a.a
m O
SS 01064..
NN
� 1 Lr
l
Figure 13: 2020 Traffic Volumes without Project.
HORROCKS
11,11
L: N (1 I\ IL H R S
Pr.,
aG F oil
I m '41-409. _409
Page 18 of 28
XX AM PEAK HOUR
XX PM PEAK HOUR
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
.„K. _ 5�8
I Figure 14: 2020 Traffic Volumes with Project.
Based on the traffic growth projections described above, a traffic operations analysis of the
future 2020 traffic conditions was performed.
It was assumed that the Madison Elementary and High School would be built by the year 2012;
these trips were added to the background traffic. It was also assumed that the senior adult
housing was built in 2020 and these trips were with the project traffic.
With the construction of the schools the intersection of 2000 West/University Blvd was assumed
to be reconstructed into a four legged intersection with a left turn lane and shared thru-right turn
lane on the north, south and west approaches. On the east approach it was assumed that there
would be a shared left-thru lane and a separate right turn lane. This was assumed to be an all -
way stop intersection. An additional intersection will also be constructed on 2000 West as a
back access to the school. This intersection was assumed to be a three legged stop controlled
HORROCKS
Ihll
F � `' I 'N F - F R Page 19 of 28
I
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
intersection with one approach lane in the north and south approach and separate left and right
turn lanes on the eastbound approach.
Conditions with and without the project are summarized in the following tables.
Table 8: 2020 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour With and Without Project
Intersection
Without Project
Delay (seclveh) LOS
With Project
Delay (sec/veh)
LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
11.2
B
15.2
B
2000 West/1000 South*
7.4
A
13.8
B
2000 West/University Blvd*
11.0
B
13.3
B
3000 West/1000 South*
5.5
A
5.5
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
16.4
C
28.9
D
2000 West/Access #1*
-
7.6
A
1000 South/Access#2*
5.9
A
1000 South/Access#3*
5.2
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
Table 9: 2020 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour With and Without Project
Intersection
Without Project
Delay (sec/veh) LOS
With Project
Delay (seelveh)
LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
10.7
B
14.7
B
2000 West/1000 South*
4.8
A
7.5
A
2000 West/University Blvd*
7.5
A
7.8
A
3000 West/1000 South*
4.6
A
4.6
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
4.9
A
5.7
A
2000 West/Access#1*
-
7.2
A
1000 South/Access#2*
4.8
A
1000 South/Access#3*
3.8
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
As shown in Tables 8 and 9, with the project, the study intersections are projected to operate at
acceptable LOS C or better in 2020, except the intersection of 2000 West/School Back Access
will operate at LOS D in the AM peak hour. The LOS D at this intersection of 2000
West/School Back Access represents the exiting vehicle movement only (10 vph turning left).
2025 Level of Service
The rate for traffic growth to 2025 was assumed to be 1.7 percent. Based on the traffic growth
projections described above, a traffic operations analysis of the future 2025 traffic conditions
was performed.
The traffic volumes in 2025 without the project are shown in the figure below.
H O RRO C K S
Iltl
t: v e i i N 1 t: k S Page 20 of 28
XX AM PEAK HOUR
XX PM PEAK HOUR
SOTS LHti
5 5 Z£T
J I U r��
cN �1
Nom' 055
Figure 15: 2025 Traffic Volumes without Project.
HO RRO C K S
Iris
1 N C7 I N F I K S
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
S Oz OST L
m�i
J16
rsm
7-7
titr
;o
:
23 28 168
'52
6050130
00 11
1.4 m _409 73
\ .20
Page 21 of 28
m�i
oMooIr
73 10190
tLN
30mgae�
m.
HSOR
$N y
2787
oM 1
030 /
00 11
1.4 m _409 73
\ .20
Page 21 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
3 Rexburg, Idaho
Figure 16: 2025 Traffic Volumes with Project.
Conditions with and without the project are summarized in the following tables.
HORROCKS
nai
I : N a i n 1 s i_: R S Page 22 of 28
SU60M
XX AM PEAK HOUR
XX PM PEAR HOUR
JILI~�N
�n'
1tr
9
i
1628 317
1
8150293
t
01 £
CZZ EZ
Project Area
5660
2£ 96104
= o o t
1
11252
-_
SOTS 6L
S 5 2E[4— qL
95 ,�
609Y60LZ
61294
«o S
J16 r�� J
r
J r^
1
J14r.
xl
as
i boy 1tr Uy
_V�Jy
SNy
1tr
5 5 5 S
.�
669010
8825130
-
0109M
a
501922
n�
J4 to
1tr
$z ~
621810
100070 .,.
Figure 16: 2025 Traffic Volumes with Project.
Conditions with and without the project are summarized in the following tables.
HORROCKS
nai
I : N a i n 1 s i_: R S Page 22 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Table 10: 2025 Traffic Operations Summary — AM Peak Hour With and Without Project
Intersection
Without Project
Delay (see/veh) LOS
With Project
Delay (see/veh)
LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
12.2
B
17.9
B
2000 West/1000 South*
8.3
A
14.5
B
2000 West/University Blvd*
10.9
B
13.5
B
3000 West/1000 South*
5.5
A
5.5
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
16.8
C
47.3
E
2000 West/Access #1*
-
7.3
A
1000 South/Access#2*
6.2
A
1000 South/Access#3*
5.1
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
Table 11: 2025 Traffic Operations Summary — PM Peak Hour With and Without Project
Intersection
Without Project
Delay (see/veh) LOS
With Project
Delay (see/veh)
LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
11.4
B
15.7
B
2000 West/1000 South*
5.0
A
9.2
A
2000 West/University Blvd*
7.7
A
7.9
A
3000 West/1000 South*
4.6
A
4.7
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
4.9
A
6.1
A
2000 West/Access #1*
-
7.7
A
1000 South/Access #2*
5.0
A
1000 South/Access #3*
3.8
A
*un signalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
As shown in Tables 10 and 11, with the project, the study intersections are projected to operate at
acceptable LOS C or better in 2025, except the intersection of 2000 West/School Back Access
will operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour. The LOS E at this intersection of 2000 West/School
Back Access represents the existing vehicle movement only (10 vph turning left). If the delay
become too long for vehicles to turn left onto 2000 West they will be re-route to the front access
where the delay is lower.
Mitigations
Improvements were made to increase the capacity of the roadway network. The following
mitigations are recommended when the schools and the project are at build out.
1.) The intersection of 2000 West/1000 South should be reconstructed with a separate left
turn and shared thru-right turn lane in the eastbound and northbound approaches. The
HORROCKS
IMI
Page 23 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
southbound approach should be reconstructed with separate left turn lane, thru lane, and
right turn lane.
2.) As recommended in the Madison School District Traffic Impact Study, the intersection of
2000 West/University Blvd should be reconstructed as a signal or a single lane
roundabout. The intersection does not warrant a signal for peak hour traffic, but may
i meet the school crossing warrant. A roundabout will continue to promote traffic calming
for the area around the High School. The Summerfield project contributes 14 percent of
the trips using the intersection.
-) 3.) The intersection of 2000 West/School Back Access should be constructed with a separate
: 1 northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane.
4.) The intersection of 2000 West/Access #1 should be constructed with a separate
northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane.
y 5.) The intersections of 1000 South/Access #2 and 1000 South/Access #3 should be
constructed with separate westbound right turn lanes.
Table 12: 2020 Traffic Operations Summary - AM Peak Hour Mitigations
Intersection
Without Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
With Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
15.2
B
14.8
B
2000 West/1000 South*
13.8
B
9.8
A
2000 West/University Blvd**
13.3
B
21.3
C
3000 West/1000 South*
5.5
A
5.1
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
28.9
D
9.3
A
2000 West/Access #1*
7.6
A
7.1
A
1000 South/Access #2*
5.9
A
5.9
A
1000 South/Access #3*
5.2
A
4.4
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
**roundabout intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
Table 13: 2020 Trak Operations Summary - PM Peak Hour Mitigations
Intersection
Without Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
With Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
14.7
B
13.8
B
2000 West/1000 South*
7.5
A
6.6
A
2000 West/University Blvd**
7.8
A
4.9
A
3000 West/1000 South*
4.6
A
4.5
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
5.7
A
5.4
A
2000 West/Access #1*
7.2
A
6.3
A
1000 South/Access #2*
4.8
A
4.3
A
1000 South/Access #3*
3.8
A
3.3
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
**roundabout intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
HORROCKS
II -II
N <I I \ I[ L: RS
Page 24 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Table 14: 2025 Traffic Operations Summary - AM Peak Hour Mitigations
Intersection
Without Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
With Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
17.9
B
16.6
B
2000 West/1000 South*
14.5
B
10.1
B
2000 West/University Blvd**
13.5
B
22.6
C
3000 West/1000 South*
5.5
A
5.4
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
47.3
E
15.5
C
2000 West/Access #1*
7.3
A
6.9
A
1000 South/Access#2*
6.2
A
6.2
A
1000 South/Access#3*
5.1
A
4.7
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
**roundabout intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
Table 15: 2025 Traffic Operations Summary - PM Peak Hour Mitigations
Intersection
Without Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
With Mitigations
Delay (sedveh) LOS
2000 West/Highway 33
15.7
B
15.6
B
2000 West/1000 South*
9.2
A
6.8
A
2000 West/University Blvd**
7.9
A
4.8
A
3000 West/1000 South*
4.7
A
4.6
A
2000 West/School Back Access*
6.1
A
5.2
A
2000 West/Access#1*
7.7
A
5.4
A
1000 South/Access #2*
5.0
A
4.1
A
1000 South/Access #3*
3.8
A
3.5
A
*unsignalized intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
**roundabout intersection, approach with highest delay is shown
As shown above, after mitigations the study intersections will experience a decrease in delays,
and all studied intersections will operate at LOS C or better to the year 2025. The intersection of
2000 West/University Blvd will operate under acceptable conditions under both the 4 -way -stop
and the roundabout configurations.
2000 West/University Blvd Trip Distribution
The impact to the intersection of 2000 West/University Blvd was evaluated by Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) generated by the project and the Elementary School and High School that used the
intersection. The project will generate approximately 1,500 ADT in the AM peak hour and
1,800 ADT in the PM peak hour that will travel thru the intersection. The schools will generate
approximately 10,500 ADT in the AM peak hour and 3,900 ADT in the PM peak hour that will
travel thru the intersection. The figure below shows the trip distribution for the intersection with
2025 background traffic volumes.
HORROCKS
11,11
P v c i N tt I R s Page 25 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
Figure 17: 2000 West/University Blvd Trip Distributions.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Summerfield development is planned to be located between Highway 33 and 1000 South on
2000 West in southwest Rexburg, Idaho. The study intersections include 2000 West/Highway
33, 2000 West/1000 South, 2000 West/University Blvd, 3000 West/1000 South, as well as the
project accesses.
The Summerfield development consists of 505 single family units. The surrounding land uses
consist of scattered single family homes and agricultural land. The site proposes three project
accesses, one on 2000 West and two on 1000 South.
At build -out, the Summerfield is expected to generate an average of 4,613 new daily weekday
trips with 363 during the AM peak hour and 460 during the PM peak hour. The future planned
High School and Elementary School in the area are expected to generate an average of 1,192
vehicle trips in the AM peak hour. The future senior housing development is expected to
HORROCKS
Irn
1' N(, I\ ti E R S
Page 26 of 28
Summerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
generate an average of 1,180 new daily weekday trips with 61 during the AM peak hour and 95
during the PM peak hour.
> Without the project, the studied intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better.
1 By the year 2025 with the project traffic and the Elementary School and High School traffic the
intersections will operate at acceptable LOS C or better, except the intersection of 2000
West/School Back Access will operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour.
The roadway and intersection improvements listed below will substantially mitigate the impacts
and provide adequate traffic safety and operations for the roadway network. The following
mitigations are recommended:
1.) The intersection of 2000 West/1000 South should be reconstructed with a separate left
turn and shared thru-right turn lane in the eastbound and northbound approaches. The
southbound approach should be reconstructed with separate left turn lane, thru lane, and
right turn lane.
2.) As recommended in the Madison School District Traffic Impact Study, the intersection of
2000 West/University Blvd should be reconstructed as a signal or a single lane
roundabout. The intersection does not warrant a signal for peak hour traffic, but may
meet the school crossing warrant. A roundabout will continue to promote traffic calming
for the area around the High School. The Summerfield project contributes 14 percent of
the trips using the intersection.
3.) The intersection of 2000 West/School Back Access should be constructed with a separate
northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane.
4.) The intersection of 2000 West/Access #1 should be constructed with a separate
northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane.
5.) The intersections of 1000 South/Access #2 and 1000 South/Access #3 should be
constructed with separate westbound right turn lanes.
HORROCKS
mii
G1 n e e R s
Page 27 of 28
Sumunerfield PUD, Traffic Impact Study
Rexburg, Idaho
APPENDIX
HORROCKS
11-11
L v c i h u e R S Page 28 of 28
T y
r
m m� n Q
So
d
3
r
a
m
m
m
a
d
y E m
y
u M
W
m m N
r
N O
r
r
J
N N— 0 0
N
3 0
�N�nm
n Myo
L
Qn.-ono
N
nm
K'
y
Y
N F L
u
m
z°
r
o y
M J
r
L
cmmv�mNm
Y
j
N
r
am
n N m rn m n
N N
J
0
�mm
in
c`
r
vii voi vNi
L
m
M O N m O m
Q Q m n n m
y
Y
u
r
Q
m m m n o m
j
I
N N N N M M
i
r
r
C
a a a a a a a a
y
Q N N N N [p m m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E
a a a a a a a a
H
ono join ov>
MQ o env o
Q Q V1 m N m ip (O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c
0
a
c
3
r
a
m
m
m
d
rn E
d
y E m
_
L
Q
K
W
m m N
o
N O
r
r
m
N m
L
N
3 0
r
o L
m
N
9
C
N
N F L
Y
z°
o y
M J
y
N
J
9
c
Q L N
r
L
h
_
L
Q
K
m m N
d
mE,�
d
rnE
L
Z o
3 0
r
r
N
N
H
T N
J N
O O
�imnmQ
xr
b
b Q
m O O m N
L
N
m
N
d
a
b
N
d
y E m
u
M
L
T
K r J
r
r
O
O
O
N
N O
r
r
m N Q
m m M
N L
m
L
C
K
9
Y
C
�m
O
H
N
N
C
J
'
N N Q m Q M
Z
m
r
L
o
m m m rn Q
r
N M0
Y
�
N
r
N
m
m M m m O O
J
I
r
L
m
O m n m
N
N
Y
r
Q
m N O O O O
j
N N Q m m n
1
r
t
N
O N - 0 0
K
aaaaaaaa
q
N O VI O N O O
Q O
v
y
n n n
0 0 0 mai
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b
E
a a < a < a < a a
< a < a < <
O M Q O M Q
on nnai aimai
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9
c
J N
V
a
y
L
N
m
N
d
b
rn E
d
y E m
J;
Om
Z L
L
T
K r J
r
W b
O
O
O
N
N O
r
r
m N Q
m m M
N L
m
C
9
C
O
C
Z
m
N M
J N
V
d N �
y
L
N
.21
Q m N
b
OIE
m
d
J Q M
x 22 J O Q
�>
J F'a'. a> m
Z o
3 0
r
r
O
Q
N
2.00. — 0000—
0 0 0 0
J �
ZLL
O �
F b
a O c to)
0
C
r
c
o
V N t
0 q
Q O
N N O
Z 10-
O y
J
O
a
3
M O O O O
Cm'I N N
m
Q
N
d
d E N
u
n
o
C
`
Z a
J
r
0
r
0
W G
N C
r
t
N
r'
N
r
v
t
W OI
Y
�
m
F
d
N
J
�
r'
m
N M m O
N
Y
U
y�
f
t�
r
r
W
W W Nl V
rc
b
Y
r
r
u
J
I
a
o m m
I
r
L
N
�
Q a Q a Q a a Q
jp
NO N O N O O
2
ao m ao In
r
yr
of m m m m mm
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E
aaaaaaaa
f
O N O N O N O N
c7 V O N V O
n n wi6 �6mmm
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c
o
V N t
'o
Z
a
O y
J
O
a
3
N
W
m
�
ti
d
d E N
o m o
a
m E
ti
o
C
`
Z a
J
r
0
r
0
W G
N C
r
r
N
O �
t
W OI
(O
o
V N t
F r
Z
O y
J
O
a
o �
t N F V
N
W
t
rc�
d
d E N
o m o
a
m E
o
C
J F K m
Z a
3 0
r
0
r
0
F
T In
J 0
m
00
N m e o
i0
oom
moo
a
N
U
M
r
a1D
�
J
�
N
r
L
a
K
N
s
�
m
r`
dN
�
J
N
Y
�
N
r
vminor
J
mN
L
�
r
t
K
s
U
�
r
Ja�oN
ins
r
L
N
K
�
aM a m a m a m a m a m a m a
ry
N O 'n ON O N O
m a O M a9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22222222
E_
a a m m m m m m
r
o.0-0e000e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
C.
r
V� �r
�41.
U
w
W
9A '=z
l�7 L
Z
T N
j q
O N V V O
= F
N
3
N
0
N
�e0000
d
m E
d
d E N
N
a
E
d J
L J O
N
U
M
•L•• i
J
�
d i
m O
r
�
r
Nb
O V
�
N r C th
J
J
t
N
O O O O
r�
J Jo
N L p
L
r r
z°
N
Y
y
]
m
O
J
r
J
0 0 0 0
]
r
L
N
Y
U
y�
f
r
J
t
n
o 0 0 0
r
z
u0.-oo
K
Y
r
d
J
V
N f7 O O
J
r
i
aaaaaaaa
Z
vo�ooie o�ooi
y
r ro � of m of bi of
c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E
a a a a a a a a
N v o N v o
r n m of m� m m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
C
a
]
a
o J
3
N
N
n
d
m E
d
d E N
N
L
E
d J
L J O
N �_
J
fLr
•L•• i
m q
O
r
d i
m O
r
�
r
O V
L
N
a
e
J Jo
N L p
L
r r
z°
y
O
J
J N
a
o J
L r
N
_
L
N
K
0 o a
ti
d ] N
G
E
d J
L J O
n
F K d
0
z 0
3 0
r
r
M
�
r
A
I
T N
j m
nv��u (oo
F
M N
=
d
41
3
r_
a
m
N
d
mE
d
J
ti
d 2
u
M
J N
p
r
r
m
r
N G
r
m o. -
r
L
O 01
]
9
C
'
] O
O
r
m L
r
v
r r
K
Z
N
Y
�
m
d
r
m
J
y
N
J
�
N O O r
L
'
K
N
U
]
N
r
x
Jm.-000
r
L
Y
u
x
]
r
t
a a a a
q
a a a
N O N O N O h O
a
Z
. -me o.-mvo
f0
0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F
00.00000
O V O 7 m V
0 0
N N N NIG t0
100000000
C
9
O
o ]
a
41
3
�
a
m
ti
d
mE
d
J
ti
d 2
d
o
Z o
J N
p
r
r
m
W C
N G
r
m o. -
r
L
O 01
9
C
] O
O
m L
r r
Z
d
m
J
yN
J
9
o ]
L � r
41
L
m
�
N O V
d
mE,�
J N
d
mE
d
J
O
q
N L O N
J r rc d q
o
Z o
3 0
r
r
m
m
r
T b
N
O M y (p
O O
S r
N
OE
mm e o 0 0 0
c1Oi
¢
N
u
M
r
a
iO
J
�
�
L
r
L
d
K
N
Y
r
dN
J
i
�
r
L
O
N O 4) d
Y
�
N
r
J
1
L
^
r
L
�M
opo
r N
Y
H
J
0
n
r
z
N
aa¢aaaaa
_
b
d O N M O O N [O')
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
< < <
b
M d O M O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
r
T y
0 d
m m
a
h 0
N
= F
m
m
5
y
N
(O
d
m E
0 0 0
a
d
rn E
y
d
y E
p-
> N N
N
u
M
d
J
2'
r
L >
W o
r
m
J
�
r
L
r�
N
L
y
�
O
�
y
Y
7
m
r
d
N
J
�
r
i
o
N r m
Y
j
N
r
r
�
r
N
y
Y
u
r`
d
d
N O m O
r
L
N
rc
a aaaaaaa
p
Z
m O N O! O N O
M V O m V O
C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E
a a a a a a a a
r
O N O N O 1A O N
N N N N O m m m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e
O
a
O �
a m M
L m F N
m
m
5
y
N
(O
d
m E
0 0 0
d
a E m
d
rn E
`
d
y E
p-
> N N
N
a
L
r
d
J
r
0
L >
W o
O m
y C
r
r
�
O
�
m rn
9
C
J
�
W N F n tO
Y
z°
Nm
J m
a
O �
a m M
L m F N
m
m
5
y
L
mo
K
0 0 0
d
a E m
d
rn E
J O n
t J O
t>
F K a o
Z o
o
r
0
r
0
SimTraffic Performance Report
EB
WB
AM Peak
2008 Existing
All
Total Delay (hr)
4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach EB WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.3
0.2
0.5
1.8
Delay / Veh (s) 12.1 6.9
5.8
7.0
8.3
Total Stops 142 117
72
137
468
Avg Speed (mph) 30 31
30
22
28
Vehicles Entered 222 182
115
259
778
Vehicles Exited 223 182
115
258
778
Hourly Exit Rate 223 182
115
258
778
Input Volume 214 185
121
252
772
%of Volume 104 98
95
102
101
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
- NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.0
2.7
0.2
0.8
0.9
Total Stops
0
32
0
0
32
Avg Speed (mph)
34
26
34
33
32
Vehicles Entered
7
32
67
75
181
Vehicles Exited
7
32
68
76
183
Hourly Exit Rate
7
32
68
76
183
Input Volume
7
34
67
75
183
% of Volume
100
94
101
101
100
3: Universitv Blvd & 2000 West Performance
Approach
WB
NB --
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
3.3
0.3
0.9
1.7
Total Stops
86
0
2
88
Avg Speed (mph)
26
26
32
27
Vehicles Entered
86
70
59
215
Vehicles Exited
86
70
59
215
Hourly Exit Rate
86
70
59
215
Input Volume
87
71
59
217
% of Volume
99
99
100
99
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
Sin -Traffic Performance Report AM Peak
2008 Existing 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
1.0
1.1
3.1
4.1
2.2
Total Stops
0
0
3
10
13
Avg Speed (mph)
30
28
24
25
28
Vehicles Entered
14
4
3
10
31
Vehicles Exited
14
4
3
10
31
Hourly Exit Rate
14
4
3
10
31
Input Volume
14
5
4
11
34
% of Volume
100
80
75
91
91
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
Total Delay (hr)
2.7
Delay/ Veh (s)
10.5
Total Slops
601
Avg Speed (mph)
36
Vehicles Entered
933
Vehicles Exited
928
Hourly Exit Rate
928
Input Volume
4142
% of Volume
22
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2008 Existing 4/9/2008
1: Hiqhwav 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.7
1.1
0.2
0.3
2.3
Delay / Veh (s)
11.4
7.3
6.2
7.3
8.0
Total Stops
127
294
66
81
568
Avg Speed (mph)
30
30
31
23
30
Vehicles Entered
214
546
121
139
1020
Vehicles Exited
215
544
121
139
1019
Hourly Exit Rate
215
544
121
139
1019
Input Volume
208
542
113
143
1006
%of Volume
103
100
107
97
101
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.0
3.4
0.5
1.1
1.2
Total Stops
0
40
0
3
43
Avg Speed (mph)
35
26
34
33
32
Vehicles Entered
8
40
118
116
282
Vehicles Exited
8
40
118
116
282
Hourly Exit Rate
8
40
118
116
282
Input Volume
9
36
113
123
281
%of Volume
89
111
104
94
100
3: Universitv Blvd & 2000 West Performance by a
Approach
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
Delay/ Veh (s)
3.5
0.2
1.2
1.9
Total Slops
120
0
2
122
Avg Speed (mph)
26
38
27
28
Vehicles Entered
120
76
87
283
Vehicles Exited
120
77
86
283
Hourly Exit Rate
120
77
86
283
Input Volume
112
73
86
271
%of Volume
107
105
100
104
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2008 Existing 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach EB WB NB SB All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
0.5
0.2
4.3
4.8
3.4
Total Stops
0
0
12
14
26
Avg Speed (mph)
31
29
24
24
26
Vehicles Entered
6
4
12
14
36
Vehicles Exited
6
4
12
14
36
Hourly Exit Rate
6
4
12
14
36
Input Volume
9
4
11
14
38
% of Volume
67
100
109
100
95
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
3.7
Delay/ Veh (s)
10.7
Total Slops
759
Avg Speed (mph)
36
Vehicles Entered
1241
Vehicles Exited
1232
Hourly Exit Rate
1232
Input Volume
5429
%of Volume
23
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School 4/9/2008
1: Hiahwav 33 & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.2
0.7
0.6
1.2
3.7
Delay / Veh (s)
13.3
9,4
9.7
11.4
11.2
Total Stops
227
176
153
245
801
Avg Speed (mph)
28
29
29
19
27
Vehicles Entered
340
272
218
365
1195
Vehicles Exiled
338
272
218
365
1193
Hourly Exit Rate
338
272
218
365
1193
Input Volume
335
284
219
365
1203
%of Volume
101
96
100
100
99
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.9
Delay/ Veh (s)
7.4
5.0
2.4
2.3
4.5
Total Stops
247
65
7
1
320
Avg Speed (mph)
28
24
30
32
29
Vehicles Entered
275
64
105
280
724
Vehicles Exited
276
65
106
278
725
Hourly Exit Rate
276
65
106
278
725
Input Volume
264
60
110
284
718
% of Volume
105
108
96
98
101
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
At
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
2.3
0.4
0.4
3.5
Delay / Veh (s)
9.1
11.0
6.8
6.7
9.4
Total Slops
138
768
223
212
1341
Avg Speed (mph)
28
20
19
30
23
Vehicles Entered
138
749
223
219
1329
Vehicles Exited
138
751
223
217
1329
Hourly Exit Rate
138
751
223
217
1329
Input Volume
140
743
210
210
1303
% of Volume
99
101
106
103
102
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
0.7
0.6
4.7
5.5
2.8
Total Stops
1
1
11
152
165
Avg Speed (mph)
33
32
24
23
29
Vehicles Entered
145
54
11
151
361
Vehicles Exited
146
53
11
152
362
Hourly Exit Rate
146
53
11
152
362
Input Volume
142
61
10
142
355
%of Volume
103
87
110
107
102
27: School Back
Entrance &
2000 West
Performance
by approach
Approach
EB
NB
:. SIB '
'All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
2.0
0.4
2.5
Delay / Veh (s)
16.4
14.0
3.0
9.2
Total Stops
26
347
32
405
Avg Speed (mph)
22
20
27
23
Vehicles Entered
26
515
429
970
Vehicles Exited
25
513
428
966
Hourly Exit Rate
25
513
428
966
Input Volume
26
514
420
960
% of Volume
96
100
102
101
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
13.8
Delay/ Veh (s)
19.7
Total Stops
3032
Avg Speed (mph)
31
Vehicles Entered
2542
Vehicles Exited
2519
Hourly Exit Rale 2519
Input Volume 12971
% of Volume 19
Summerfield PIED SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School 419/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WE
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.0
1.7
0.8
0.5
4.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
14.1
9.1
11.4
10.4
10.7
Total Stops
175
361
167
133
836
Travel Dist (mi)
83.3
182.1
175.1
23.5
463.9
Fuel Used (gal)
2.0
3.9
4.6
0.5
11.0
Vehicles Entered
267
666
248
187
1368
Vehicles Exited
266
666
244
187
1363
Hourly Exit Rate
266
666
244
187
1363
Input Volume
265
670
240
175
1350
% of Volume
100
99
102
107
101
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
4.2
4.8
1.2
1.5
2.1
Total Stops
94
58
0
10
162
Travel Dist (mi)
22.7
9.8
54.6
40.6
127.7
Fuel Used (gal)
0.6
0.2
1.7
1.1
3.6
Vehicles Entered
95
58
236
173
562
Vehicles Exited
94
58
238
171
561
Hourly Exit Rate
94
58
238
171
561
Input Volume
90
60
231
170
551
%of Volume
104
97
103
101
102
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance
Npproebh
E8
WB `
NB
' 'SB-
B,
Total
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.5
1.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
7.5
4.5
4.6
7.0
6.0
Total Stops
95
168
94
281
638
Travel Dist (mi)
34.9
30.5
8.2
66.6
140.3
Fuel Used (gal)
0.9
0.7
0.1
2.7
4.4
Vehicles Entered
95
168
94
283
640
Vehicles Exited
95
168
94
281
638
Hourly Exit Rate
95
168
94
281
638
Input Volume
100
170
100
270
640
%of Volume
95
99
94
104
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.8
0.3
4.4
4.6
2.3
Total Slops
0
0
16
22
38
Travel Dist (mi)
2.5
8.3
2.2
3.1
16.1
Fuel Used (gal)
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.4
Vehicles Entered
11
32
16
22
81
Vehicles Exited
11
32
16
22
81
Hourly Exit Rate
11
32
16
22
81
Input Volume
10
30
15
20
75
% of Volume
110
107
107
110
108
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
4.9
1.5
0.9
2.6
Total Stops
185
4
0
189
Travel Dist (mi)
55.6
39.9
32.5
128.0
Fuel Used (gal)
1.3
1.6
1.2
4.2
Vehicles Entered
187
176
143
506
Vehicles Exited
185
176
142
503
Hourly Exit Rale
185
176
142
503
Input Volume
170
180
141
491
% of Volume
109
98
101
102
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
Total Delay (hr)
7.9
Delay / Veh (s)
14.6
Total Stops
1863
Travel Dist (mi)
2541.6
Fuel Used (gal)
79.4
Vehicles Entered
1941
Vehicles Exited
1924
Hourly Exit Rale
1924
Input Volume
9032
% of Volume
21
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
1: Hiohwav 33 & 2000 West Performance by aooroach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.7
6.0
Delay / Veh (s)
16.7
15.4
12.9
15.9
15.2
Total Stops
260
232
282
290
1064
Avg Speed (mph)
26
24
28
16
25
Vehicles Entered
351
325
386
377
1439
Vehicles Exited
349
322
381
378
1430
Hourly Exit Rate
349
322
381
378
1430
Input Volume
348
335
391
365
1439
% of Volume
100
96
97
104
99
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
2.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
13.8
6.6
3.4
3.0
7.7
Total Stops
388
65
13
1
467
Avg Speed (mph)
25
23
29
30
27
Vehicles Entered
388
65
153
336
942
Vehicles Exited
38B
65
153
336
942
Hourly Exit Rate
388
65
153
336
942
Input Volume
402
60
155
347
964
% of Volume
97
108
99
97
98
3: Universitv Blvd & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
3.0
0.4
0.8
4.6
Delay / Veh (s)
9.2
13.3
7.7
9.3
11.2
Total Stops
138
839
208
319
1504
Avg Speed (mph)
28
19
18
27
22
Vehicles Entered
137
802
209
325
1473
Vehicles Exited
138
803
209
323
1473
Hourly Exit Rate
138
803
209
323
1473
Input Volume
140
788
210
334
1472
% of Volume
99
102
100
97
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by aonroach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
0.6
0.8
4.9
5.5
2.6
Total Stops
1
1
9
127
138
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
24
23
29
Vehicles Entered
145
66
9
128
348
Vehicles Exited
145
65
9
127
346
Hourly Exit Rate
145
65
9
127
346
Input Volume
147
67
W
142
366
% of Volume
99
97
90
89
95
12: 1000 South & Access #2 Performance bV approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
1.1
1.1
5.9
1.9
Total Stops
0
0
86
86
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
22
31
Vehicles Entered
298
120
86
504
Vehicles Exited
299
120
86
505
Hourly Exit Rate
299
120
86
505
Input Volume
308
118
90
516
%of Volume
97
102
96
98
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance by a
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
1.0
0.7
5.2
1.9
Total Stops
0
0
94
94
Avg Speed (mph)
32
32
23
30
Vehicles Entered
251
74
95
420
Vehicles Exited
251
75
94
420
Hourly Exit Rate
251
75
94
420
Input Volume
269
76
90
435
% of Volume
93
99
104
97
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report
EB
AM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project
All
4/9/2008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
ApproachEB NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.1
0.4
0.8
Delay/ Veh (s) 7.6 1.8
3.7
3.7
Total Stops 138 8
0
146
Avg Speed (mph) 26 31
32
31
Vehicles Entered 138 263
344
745
Vehicles Exited 138 262
343
743
Hourly Exit Rate 138 262
343
743
Input Volume 130 274
348
752
%of Volume 106 96
99
99
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
3.2
0.5
3.9
Delay/ Veh (s)
28.9
20.5
3.3
12.6
Total Stops
25
473
34
532
Avg Speed (mph)
17
18
27
21
Vehicles Entered
25
565
529
1119
Vehicles Exited
25
565
527
1117
Hourly Exit Rate
25
565
527
1117
Input Volume
26
559
544
1129
%of Volume
96
101
97
99
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
21.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
25.7
Total Slops
4031
Avg Speed (mph)
30
Vehicles Entered
2962
Vehicles Exited
2930
Hourly Exit Rate
2930
Input Volume
15684
% of Volume
19
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
` WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.5
3.4
1.3
0.6
6.7
Delay/ Veh (s)
16.8
14.4
13.8
14.1
14.7
Total Stops
215
554
245
124
1138
Avg Speed (mph)
26
25
28
16
26
Vehicles Entered
313
840
334
147
1634
Vehicles Exited
310
841
331
147
1629
Hourly Exit Rate
310
841
331
147
1629
Input Volume
303
826
355
155
1639
%of Volume
102
102
93
95
99
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.9
Delay/ Veh (s)
7.5
7.1
2.3
2.8
4.0
Total Stops
191
65
24
11
291
Avg Speed (mph)
27
22
30
30
28
Vehicles Entered
191
65
357
230
843
Vehicles Exited
191
65
357
227
840
Hourly Exit Rate
191
65
357
227
840
Input Volume
193
60
369
233
855
% of Volume
99
108
97
97
98
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.7
1.5
Delay/ Veh (s)
7.8
4.9
5.3
7.8
6.4
Total Slops
94
294
116
342
846
Avg Speed (mph)
29
24
21
28
27
Vehicles Entered
94
294
116
343
847
Vehicles Exited
94
294
116
342
846
Hourly Exit Rate
94
294
116
342
846
Input Volume
100
309
110
353
872
%of Volume
94
95
105
97
97
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
0.3
0.8
4.4
4.6
2.0
Total Stops
0
0
14
18
32
Avg Speed (mph)
33
30
24
24
29
Vehicles Entered
26
32
14
18
90
Vehicles Exited
26
32
14
18
90
Hourly Exit Rate
26
32
14
18
90
Input Volume
25
34
15
20
94
%of Volume
104
94
93
90
96
12: 1000 South & Access #2 Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
0.6
1.9
4.8
2.2
Total Stops
0
0
60
60
Avg Speed (mph)
31
30
23
30
Vehicles Entered
64
200
59
323
Vehicles Exited
64
200
60
324
Hourly Exit Rate
64
200
60
324
Input Volume
57
207
56
320
%of Volume
112
97
107
101
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance by a
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
1.4
1.2
3.8
2.2
Total Stops
2
0
65
67
Avg Speed (mph)
31
31
24
29
Vehicles Entered
26
91
64
181
Vehicles Exited
27
90
65
182
Hourly Exit Rate
27
90
65
182
Input Volume
25
101
56
182
%of Volume
108
89
116
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report
PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project
4/9/20013
' 25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach ER N13 SB
All
Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.3 0.4
0.8
Delay/ Veh (s) 7.2 2.7 4.2
3.9
Total Stops 91 27 0
118
Avg Speed (mph) 26 31 31
30
Vehicles Entered 90 347 346
783
Vehicles Exited 90- 346 347,
783
Hourly Exit Rate 90 346 347
783
1 Input Volume 95 355 344
794
%of Volume 95 97 tot
99
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance by a
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
Delay/ Veh (s),
5.7
1.4
1.1
2.3
Total Stops
158
4
0
162
Avg Speed (mph)
27
29
30
29
Vehicles Entered
159
290
240
689
Vehicles Exited
158
291
240
689
Hourly Exit Rate
158
291
240
689
Input Volume
170
299
243
712
% of Volume
93
97
99
97
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
Total Delay (hr)
13.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
19.4
Total Stops
2714
Avg Speed (mph)
32
Vehicles Entered
2440
Vehicles Exited
2420
Hourly Exit Rale
2420
Input Volume
12558
% of Volume
19
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School 4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.4
0.9
0.6
1.5
4.4
Delay/ Veh (s)
14.3
10.1
9.1
13.6
12.2
Total Stops
241
222
157
302
922
Avg Speed (mph)
27
28
29
17
26
Vehicles Entered
354
329
219
409
1311
Vehicles Exiled
354
329
217
409
1309
Hourly Exit Rate
354
329
217
409
1309
Input Volume
355
314
229
405
1303
%of Volume
100
105
95
101
100
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
W
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.9
Delay / Veh (s)
8.3
4.8
2.1
2.3
4.6
Total Slops
230
61
4
0
295
Avg Speed (mph)
27
25
31
32
29
Vehicles Entered
255
61
106
304
726
Vehicles Exited
256
61
105
304
726
Hourly Exit Rate
256
61
105
304
726
Input Volume
264
60
115
304
743
%of Volume
97
102
91
100
98
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
2.3
0,4
0.4
3.4
Delay / Veh (s)
9.0
10.9
6.4
6.9
9.3
Total Stops
134
765
209
208
1316
Avg Speed (mph)
28
20
20
29
23
Vehicles Entered
134
757
208
211
1310
Vehicles Exited
134
756
209
208
1307
Hourly Exit Rate
134
756
209
208
1307
Input Volume
140
753
210
215
1318
%of Volume
96
100
100
97
99
Summerfield PUD Sin -Traffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.7
0.6
5.2
5.5
2.9
Total Stops
0
0
10
142
152
Avg Speed (mph)
33
32
23
22
28
Vehicles Entered
131
55
10
145
341
Vehicles Exited
132
56
10
142
340
Hourly Exit Rate
132
56
10
142
340
Input Volume
142
61
10
142
355
% of Volume
93
92
100
100
96
27: School Back
Entrance & 2000 West
Performance
by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
1.6
0.4
2.1
Delay / Veh (s)
16,8
11.1
3.1
7.8
Total Stops
28
300
28
356
Avg Speed (mph)
21
21
27
23
Vehicles Entered
28
514
420
962
Vehicles Exited
28
514
418
960
Hourly Exit Rate
28
514
418
960
Input Volume
26
524
421
971
% of Volume
108
98
99
99
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
Total Delay (hr)
14.3
Delay/ Veh (s)
19.7
Total Stops
3041
Avg Speed (mph)
31
Vehicles Entered
2627
Vehicles Exited
2621
Hourly Exit Rate
2621
Input Volume
13422
% of Volume
20
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School 4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.2
2.1
0.8
0.5
4.7
Delay/ Veh (s)
14.3
10.2
12.0
10.6
11.4
Total Slops
192
410
167
131
900
Avg Speed (mph)
28
28
29
19
28
Vehicles Entered
301
747
248
185
1481
Vehicles Exited
303
748
245
184
1480
Hourly Exit Rale
303
748
245
184
1480
Input Volume
295
740
250
185
1470
% of Volume
103
101
98
99
101
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
Delay/ Veh (s)
3.8
5.0
1.2
1.4
2.0
Total Stops
90
52
0
6
148
Avg Speed (mph)
27
24
31
32
30
Vehicles Entered
90
52
249
187
578
Vehicles Exited
90
53
250
187
580
Hourly Exit Rate
90
53
250
187
580
Input Volume
90
60
241
190
581
%of Volume
100
88
104
98
100
3: Universitv Blvd & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
1.2
Delay / Veh (s)
7.7
4.6
4.9
7.2
6.1
Total Stops
95
188
119
275
677
Avg Speed (mph)
29
25
21
28
27
Vehicles Entered
96
186
120
275
677
Vehicles Exited
95
188
120
275
678
Hourly Exit Rate
95
188
120
275
678
Input Volume
100
190
120
270
680
%of Volume
95
99
100
102
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report
8.9
Delay/ Veh (s)
PM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School
1952
Avg Speed (mph)
4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
2077
Approach E6 WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay/ Veh (s) 0.8 0,5
4.0
4.6
2.5
Total Stops 0 0
16
26
42
Avg Speed (mph) 31 32
25
24
29
Vehicles Entered 8 30
16
25
79
Vehicles Exited 8 30
16
26
80
Hourly Exit Rate 8 30
16
26
80
Input Volume 10 30
15
20
75
%of Volume 80 100
107
130
107
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West
Performance by approach
Approach EB NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1
0.0
0.4
Delay/ Veh (s) 4.9 1.5
0.9
2.6
Total Stops 182 3
0
185
Avg Speed (mph) 28 30
30
29
Vehicles Entered 182 191
138
511
Vehicles Exited 181 192
137
510
Hourly Exit Rate 181 192
137
510
Input Volume 170 190
141
501
%of Volume 106 101
97
102
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
8.9
Delay/ Veh (s)
15.4
Total Stops
1952
Avg Speed (mph)
34
Vehicles Entered
2077
Vehicles Exited
2074
Hourly Exit Rate
2074
Input Volume
9652
% of Volume
21
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
1: Hiqhway 33 & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB '
` WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.8
1.7
1.5
2.7
7.6
Delay / Veh (s)
17.6
16.8
13.2
23.5
17.9
Total Slops
288
263
307
391
1249
Avg Speed (mph)
25
24
28
12
24
Vehicles Entered
366
358
402
418
1544
Vehicles Exited
363
359
400
413
1535
Hourly Exit Rate
363
359
400
413
1535
Input Volume
368
365
401
405
1539
%of Volume
99
98
100
102
100
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.6
0.1
0.2
0.3
2.1
Delay / Veh (s)
14.5
5.8
3.4
2.8
8.0
Total Stops
403
58
20
1
482
Avg Speed (mph)
25
23
29
31
27
Vehicles Entered
401
57
158
338
954
Vehicles Exited
400
58
157
336
951
Hourly Exit Rate
400
58
157
336
951
Input Volume
402
60
160
347
969
%of Volume
100
97
98
97
98
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB '.'.NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
2.9
0.5
0.9
4.7
Delay / Veh (s)
10.5
13.5
8.0
9.7
11.6
Total Stops
148
817
223
329
1517
Avg Speed (mph)
27
19
18
27
22
Vehicles Entered
148
777
223
332
1480
Vehicles Exited
148
778
223
329
1478
Hourly Exit Rate
148
778
223
329
1478
Input Volume
140
798
210
339
1487
%of Volume
106
97
106
97
99
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
0.7
0.8
4.6
5.5
2.8
Total Stops
0
1
8
151
160
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
24
23
29
Vehicles Entered
140
69
8
151
368
Vehicles Exiled
140
68
8
150
366
Hourly Exit Rate
140
68
8
150
366
Input Volume
147
67
10
142
366
% of Volume
95
101
80
106
100
12: 1000 South & Access #2 Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
1.1
1.1
6.2
2.0
Total Stops
0
0
88
88
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
22
31
Vehicles Entered
308
116
88
512
Vehicles Exited
307
115
88
510
Hourly Exit Rate
307
115
88
510
Input Volume
308
118
90
516
%of Volume
100
97
98
99
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Delay/ Veh (s)
1.0
0.7
5.1
1.8
Total Stops
0
0
92
92
Avg Speed (mph)
32
33
23
31
Vehicles Entered
267
71
92
430
Vehicles Exited
266
70
92
428
Hourly Exit Rate
266
70
92
428
Input Volume
269
76
90
435
% of Volume
99
92
102
98
Summerfield PUD SimTraflic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.8
Delay/ Veh (s)
7.3
1.5
3.8
3.6
Total Stops
128
7
0
135
Avg Speed (mph)
26
31
32
31
Vehicles Entered
128
271
359
758
Vehicles Exiled
127
269
357
753
Hourly Exit Rate
127
269
357
753
Input Volume
130
274
368
772
% of Volume
98
98
97
98
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
3.2
0.5
4.0
Delay / Veh (s)
47.3
20.9
3.3
13.0
Total Stops
24
461
34
519
Avg Speed (mph)
14
17
27
21
Vehicles Entered
25
560
536
1121
Vehicles Exiled
24
556
534
1114
Hourly Exit Rate
24
556
534
1114
Input Volume
26
569
545
1140
% of Volume
92
98
98
98
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
Total Delay (hr)
23.2
Delay / Veh (s)
27.4
Total Stops
4242
Avg Speed (mph)
30
Vehicles Entered
3065
Vehicles Exited
3020
Hourly Exit Rate
3020
Input Volume
16115
% of Volume
19
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report
PM Peak
2025 Existing
Plus School Plus Project
4/912008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Acjpiroa ch
EB, WB
NB,!,,
SB
A1
Total Delay (hr)
1.6 4.1
1.3
0.7
7.8
Delay/ Veh (s)
17.1 16.4
12.9
15.4
15.7
Total Stops
251 634
255
141
1281
Avg Speed (mph)
26 23
28
16
25
Vehicles Entered
345 909
363
169
1786
Vehicles Exited
345 908
362
169
1784
Hourly Exit Rate
345 908
362
169
1784
Input Volume
333 896
365
185
1779
% of Volume
104 101
99
91
too
2: 1000 South
& 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
Eq - *B
NB-
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.5 0.1
0.3
0.2
1.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
9.2 6.4
2.6
2.8
4.4
Total Stops
194 52
28
11
285
Avg Speed (mph)
26 23
30
30
28
Vehicles Entered
196 53
348
250
847
Vehicles Exited
194 53
349
247
843
Hourly Exit Rate
194 53
349
247
843
Input Volume
193 60
369
233
855
% of Volume
101 88
95
106
99
3: University
Blvd & 2000 West Performance
by approach
Approach
EB B-
WB
,NB
S B
4",Ajl
Total Delay (hr)
0.2 0.4
0.2
0.8
1.6
Delay/ Veh (s)
7.7 5.0
5.1
7.9
6.5
Total Stops
91 316
116
355
878
Avg Speed (mph)
29 24
21
28
26
Vehicles Entered
91 314
116
356
877
Vehicles Exited
91 316
116
355
878
Hourly Exit Rate
91 316
116
355
878
Input Volume
100 329
120
353
902
% of Volume
91 96
97
101
97
Summerfield PUD SmTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance
Approach
1B
WB
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
Delay I Veh (s)
0.3
0.7
Total Stops
0
0
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
Vehicles Entered
26
29
Vehicles Exited
26
29
Hourly Exit Rate
26
29
Input Volume
25
35
% of Volume
104
83
NB
SB
Ail
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
4.7
1.9
12
19
31
24
24
30
12
19
86
12
19
86
12
19
86
15
20
95
80
95
91
12- 1000 South & Access #2 Performance
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
0.6
1.8
5.0
2.1
Total Stops
0
0
52
52
Avg Speed (mph)
32
30
23
30
Vehicles Entered
60
204
52
316
Vehicles Exited
60
204
52
316
Hourly Exit Rate
60
204
52
316
Input Volume
57
207
56
320
% of Volume
105
99
93
99
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
Delay / Veh (a)
1.1
1.3
3.8
2.0
Total Stops
0
0
57
57
Avg Speed (mph)
31
31
25
29
Vehicles Entered
23
104
57
184
Vehicles Exited
22
103
57
182
Hourly Exit Rate
22
103
57
182
Input Volume
25
107
56
188
% of Volume
88
96
102
97
Summerfield PUD SinnTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2025 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.9
Delay / Veh (s)
7.7
2.6
3.9
3.8
Total Slops
97
23
0
120
Avg Speed (mph)
26
31
31
30
Vehicles Entered
96
342
411
849
Vehicles Exited
97
343
411
851
Hourly Exit Rate
97
343
411
851
Input Volume
95
355
384
834
%of Volume
102
97
107
102
27: School Back Entrance
&
2000
West
Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
58
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
Delay/ Veh (s)
6.1
1.4
1.2
2.4
Total Stops
169
4
0
173
Avg Speed (mph)
27
29
31
29
Vehicles Entered
169
293
245
707
Vehicles Exited
168
293
245
706
Houry Exit Rate
168
293
245
706
Input Volume
170
309
243
722
% of Volume
99
95
101
98
Total Network Performance
pp
Total Delay (hr)
14.8
Delay/ Veh (s)
20.7
Total Stops
2877
Avg Speed (mph)
32
Vehicles Entered
2583
Vehicles Exited
2562
Hourly Exit Rate
2562
Input Volume
13185
% of Volume
19
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Mitigations 4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.5
1.2
1.4
1.7
5.8
Delay / Veh (s)
16.0
13.6
12.6
17.1
14.8
Total Stops
258
233
285
282
1058
Avg Speed (mph)
26
26
28
15
25
Vehicles Entered
340
328
396
358
1422
Vehicles Exited
340
330
388
357
1415
Hourly Exit Rate
340
330
388
357
1415
Input Volume
348
335
391
365
1439
%of Volume
98
99
99
98
98
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.4
Delay/ Veh (s)
9.8
5.6
1.4
2.2
5.4
Total Stops
392
65
12
1
470
Avg Speed (mph)
27
24
31
31
28
Vehicles Entered
391
65
157
339
952
Vehicles Exited
391
64
157
336
948
Hourly Exit Rale
391
64
157
336
948
Input Volume
402
60
155
347
964
% of Volume
97
107
101
97
98
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance
by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
4.7
0.3
0.5
5.7
Delay / Veh (s)
5.0
21.3
4.7
5.7
13.9
Total Stops
22
450
62
95
629
Avg Speed (mph)
30
16
20
27
20
Vehicles Entered
142
797
209
329
1477
Vehicles Exited
143
798
209
327
1477
Hourly Exit Rate
143
798
209
327
1477
Input Volume
140
788
210
334
1472
% of Volume
102
101
100
98
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Mitigations 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
NI
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
0.6
0.7
5.1
5.3
2.7
Total Stops
1
0
11
145
157
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
23
23
29
Vehicles Entered
135
65
11
145
356
Vehicles Exited
137
64
11
145
357
Hourly Exit Rate
137
64
11
145
357
Input Volume
147
67
10
142
366
%of Volume
93
96
110
102
98
12: 1000 South & Access #2 Performance by aooroach
Approach
EB
WB
56
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.3
Delay/ Veh (s)
1.3
0.8
5.9
2.0
Total Stops
0
0
89
89
Avg Speed (mph)
32
31
22
31
Vehicles Entered
297
113
88
498
Vehicles Exited
297
113
89
499
Hourly Exit Rate
297
113
89
499
Input Volume
308
118
90
516
% of Volume
96
96
99
97
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance by approach
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
1.0
0.4
4.4
1.7
Total Stops
0
0
95
95
Avg Speed (mph)
32
33
23
30
Vehicles Entered
259
72
96
427
Vehicles Exited
258
72
95
425
Hourly Exit Rate
258
72
95
425
Input Volume
269
76
90
435
% of Volume
96
95
106
98
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2020 Mitigations 4/9/2008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by aooroach
4proach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.7
Delay / Veh (s)
7.1
1.4
3.6
3.4
Total Slops
137
6
0
143
Avg Speed (mph)
26
31
32
31
Vehicles Entered
137
284
329
750
Vehicles Exited
137
284
329
750
Hourly Exit Rate
137
284
329
750
Input Volume
130
274
348
752
% of Volume
105
104
95
100
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance
Approach
—EB
NB
SB '—
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
1.1
0.3
1.5
Delay/ Veh (s)
9.3
7.1
2.3
4.9
Total Stops
31
247
30
308
Avg Speed (mph)
25
24
28
26
Vehicles Entered
32
576
522
1130
Vehicles Exited
31
577
521
1129
Hourly Exit Rate
31
577
521
1129
Input Volume
26
559
544
' 1129
%of Volume
119
103
96
100
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
Total Delay (hr)
18.7
Delay / Veh (s)
23.0
Total Stops
2975
Avg Speed (mph)
30
Vehicles Entered
2942
Vehicles Exited
2923
Hourly Exit Rate
2923
Input Volume
15684
% of Volume
19
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.4
3.0
1.3
0.7
6.3
Delay / Veh (s)
16.8
12.9
13.0
15.0
13.8
Total Stops
218
515
262
134
1129
Avg Speed (mph)
26
26
28
16
26
Vehicles Entered
298
841
360
158
1657
Vehicles Exited
296
840
360
158
1654
Hourly Exit Rate
296
840
360
158
1654
Input Volume
303
826
355
155
1639
%of Volume
98
102
101
102
101
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.8
Delay/ Veh (s)
6.6
6.0
1.9
1.9
3.3
Total Stops
203
62
16
9
290
Avg Speed (mph)
28
23
30
30
29
Vehicles Entered
204
63
364
224
855
Vehicles Exited
203
62
364
223
852
Hourly Exit Rate
203
62
364
223
852
Input Volume
193
60
369
233
855
%of Volume
105
103
99
96
100
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.9
Delay/ Veh (s)
4.9
3.3
4.1
4.1
3.9
Total Stops
20
7
24
18
69
Avg Speed (mph)
30
27
22
28
28 -
Vehicles Entered
98
305
99
348
850
Vehicles Exited
97
304
99
348
848
Hourly Exit Rate
97
304
99
348
848
Input Volume
100
309
110
353
872
%of Volume
97
98
90
99
97
Summedield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance bV approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.4
0.4
3.6
4.5
1.9
Total Stops
0
0
14
24
38
Avg Speed (mph)
32
31
25
25
29
Vehicles Entered
26
34
13
24
97
Vehicles Exited
26
34
14
24
98
Hourly Exit Rate
26
34
14
24
98
Input Volume
25
34
15
20
94
% of Volume
104
100
93
120
104
12: 1000 South & Access #2 Performance
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
Delay/Van(s)
0.7
1.4
4.3
1,8
Total Stops
0
0
64
64
Avg Speed (mph)
32
30
23
30
Vehicles Entered
67
214
64
345
Vehicles Exited
67
212
64
343
Hourly Exit Rate
67
212
64
343
Input Volume
57
207
56
320
%of Volume
118
102
114
107
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All r
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
1.1
0.7
3.3
1.7
Total Stops
1
0
65
66
Avg Speed (mph)
31
31
25
30
Vehicles Entered
27
105
64
196
Vehicles Exited
26
104
65
195
Hourly Exit Rate
26
104
65
195
Input Volume
25
101
56
182
%of Volume
104
103
116
107
Summerfield PUD Sin -Traffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2020 Existing Plus School Plus Project 4/912008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
'approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
Delay / Veh (s)
6.3
1.9
3.5
3.1
Total Stops
92
18
0
110
Avg Speed (mph)
26
31
31
31
Vehicles Entered
93
358
344
795
Vehicles Exited
92
359
345
796
Hourly Exit Rate
92
359
345
796
Input Volume
95
355
344
794
% of Volume
97
101
100
100
27: School Back Entrance &
2000
West
Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
Delay/ Veh (s)
5.4
0.9
0.9
1.9
Total Stops
168
5
0
173
Avg Speed (mph)
27
30
31
29
Vehicles Entered
168
295
238
701
Vehicles Exited
168
297
236
701
Hourly Exit Rate
168
297
236
701
Input Volume
170
299
243
712
%of Volume
99
99
97
98
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
11.5
Delay/ Veh (s)
16.9
Total Slops
1940
Avg Speed (mph)
32
Vehicles Entered
2463
Vehicles Exited
2450
Hourly Exit Rate
2450
Input Volume
12558
% of Volume
20
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Mitigations 4/912009
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.6
1.5
1.5
2.0
6.6
Delay/Veh(s)
16.7
16.1
14.7
18.8
16.6
Total Stops
258
243
289
325
1115
Avg Speed (mph)
26
24
27
14
24
Vehicles Entered
341
344
366
382
1433
Vehicles Exited
340
342
357
383
1422
Hourly Exit Rate
371
373
389
418
1551
Input Volume
368
365
401
405
1539
%of Volume
lot
102
97
103
101
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.4
Delay / Veh (s)
10.1
6.6
1.4
2.4
5.6
Total Stops
358
58
13
1
430
Avg Speed (mph)
26
23
31
31
28
Vehicles Entered
356
59
153
312
880
Vehicles Exited
357
58
153
310
878
Hourly Exit Rate
389
63
167
338
958
Input Volume
402
60
160
347
969
% of Volume
97
105
104
97
99
3: University Blvd & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
4.6
0.3
0.4
5.5
Delay/ Veh (s)
5.2
22.6
4.9
5.3
14.5
Total Stops
21
435
65
95
616
Avg Speed (mph)
30
15
20
21
18
Vehicles Entered
128
734
202
304
1368
Vehicles Exited
129
734
202
302
1367
Hourly Exit Rate
141
801
220
329
1491
Input Volume
140
798
210
339
1487
% of Volume
101
100
105
97
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Mitigations 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.7
0.7
5.2
5.4
2.7
Total Stops
1
0
9
129
139
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
23
23
29
Vehicles Entered
126
62
9
128
325
Vehicles Exited
126
62
9
129
326
Hourly Exit Rate
137
68
10
141
356
Input Volume
147
67
10
142
366
% of Volume
94
101
98
99
97
12: 1000 South & Access #2 Performance
by approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.3
Delay/ Veh (s)
1.2
1.1
6.2
2.1
Total Stops
0
0
83
83
Avg Speed (mph)
33
31
21
31
Vehicles Entered
272
112
83
467
Vehicles Exited
270
112
83
465
Hourly Exit Rate
295
122
91
507
Input Volume
308
118
90
516
% of Volume
96
104
101
98
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance
by approach
Approach
EB'
WB ':
SB
NL
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
1.0
0.6
4.7
1.8
Total Stops
0
0
86
86
Avg Speed (mph)
32
33
23
31
Vehicles Entered
230
71
86
387
Vehicles Exited
230
71
86
387
Hourly Exit Rate
251
77
94
422
Input Volume
269
76
90
435
% of Volume
93
102
104
97
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak
2025 Mitigations 4/9/2008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NIB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.7
Delay/ Veh (s)
6.9
1.5
3.6
3.4
Total Stops
121
8
0
129
Avg Speed (mph)
26
31
32
31
Vehicles Entered
123
245
342
710
Vehicles Exited
122
244
341
707
Hourly Exit Rate
133
266
372
771
Input Volume
130
274
368
772
% of Volume
102
97
101
100
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
1.0
0.3
1.4
Delay/ Veh (s)
15.5
6.8
2.4
4.9
Total Stops
28
236
33
297
Avg Speed (mph)
22
23
28
25
Vehicles Entered
28
534
493
1055
Vehicles Exiled
28
534
491
1053
Hourly Exit Rate
31
583
536
1149
Input Volume
26
569
545
1140
% of Volume
117
102
98
101
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
19.1
Delay / Veh (s)
24.2
Total Stops
2905
Avg Speed (mph)
30
Vehicles Entered
2849
Vehicles Exited
2824
Hourly Exit Rate
3081
Input Volume
17023
% of Volume
18
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2025 Mitigations 4/9/2008
1: Highway 33 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.4
3.6
1.3
0.7
7.0
Delay/ Veh (s)
16.6
15.9
13.6
16.4
15.6
Total Slops
219
570
242
134
1165
Avg Speed (mph)
26
24
28
15
25
Vehicles Entered
306
826
334
164
1630
Vehicles Exiled
305
825
329
163
1622
Hourly Exit Rate
333
900
359
178
1769
Input Volume
333
896
365
185
1779
%of Volume
100
100
98
96
99
2: 1000 South & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
W8
N8
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.8
Delay/ Veh (s)
6.8
6.4
2.1
1.9
3.5
Total Stops
185
56
15
10
266
Avg Speed (mph)
27
23
31
30
29
Vehicles Entered
184
56
341
208
789
Vehicles Exited
185
56
341
208
790
Hourly Exit Rate
202
61
372
227
862
Input Volume
193
60
369
233
855
%of Volume
105
102
101
97
101
3: Universitv Blvd & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB._
NB
SB ,
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.9
Delay / Veh (s)
4.8
3.6
3.7
4.4
4.1
Total Stops
24
10
23
30
87
Avg Speed (mph)
30
27
22
27
27
Vehicles Entered
95
303
105
325
828
Vehicles Exiled
95
304
104
325
828
Hourly Exit Rate
104
332
113
355
903
Input Volume
100
329
120
353
902
%of Volume
104
101
95
100
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 1
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2025 Mitigations 4/9/2008
4: 1000 South & 3000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
Ail
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
0.5
0.5
4.2
4.6
1.9
Total Stops
0
0
10
20
30
Avg Speed (mph)
33
32
25
24
30
Vehicles Entered
23
29
10
20
82
Vehicles Exited
23
29
10
20
82
Houdy Exit Rate
25
32
11
22
89
Input Volume
25
35
15
20
95
% of Volume
100
90
73
109
94
12: 1000 South &
Access #2 Performance
by approach
Approach
EB
WB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
Delay/ Veh (s)
0.7
1.4
4.1
1.7
Total Slops
0
0
50
50
Avg Speed (mph)
31
30
24
30
Vehicles Entered
56
192
50
298
Vehicles Exited
56
190
50
296
Hourly Exit Rate
61
207
55
323
Input Volume
57
207
56
320
%of Volume
107
100
97
101
18: 1000 South & Access #3 Performance
by approach
roach EB WB SB All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
1.2
0.7
3.5
1.6
Total Stops
1
0
53
54
Avg Speed (mph)
31
31
24
30
Vehicles Entered
20
101
53
174
Vehicles Exited
20
99
53
172
Hourly Exit Rate
22
108
58
188
Input Volume
25
107
56
188
%of Volume
87
101
103
100
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 2
SimTraffic Performance Report PM Peak
2025 Mitigations 4/9/2008
25: Access #1 & 2000 West Performance by approach
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
U
03
0.6
Delay IVeh (s)
5.4
1.9
3.4
3.0
Total Stops
79
14
0
93
Avg Speed (mph)
27
31
31
31
Vehicles Entered
79
334
352
765
Vehicles Exited
79
332
350
761
Hourly Exit Rate
86
362
382
830
Input Volume
95
355
384
834
% of Volume
91
102
99
100
27: School Back Entrance & 2000 West Performance
Approach
EB
NB
SB
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
Delay/ Veh (s)
5.2
1.0
0.9
1.9
Total Stops
154
4
0
158
Avg Speed (mph)
27
30
30
29
Vehicles Entered
154
287
221
662
Vehicles Exited
154
287
222
663
Hourly Exit Rate
168
313
242
723
Input Volume
170
309
243
722
%of Volume
99
101
100
100
Total Network Performance
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3
Total Delay (hr)
12.2
Delay/ Veh (s)
18.5
Total Stops
1906
Avg Speed (mph)
32
Vehicles Entered
2389
Vehicles Exited
2363
Hourly Exit Rate
2578
Input Volume
13185
% of Volume
20
Summerfield PUD SimTraffic Report
Horrocks Engineers Page 3