Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTAFF REPORT - 14-00151 - City of Rexburg - Comp Plan AmendCommunity Development Department STAFF REPORT 35 North Int East volc@rexburg.org Phone: 208.359.3020 Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208; 359.3022 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application File # 14 00 151— City of Rexburg 3rd West Neighborhood APPLICANT: City of Rexburg PROPERTY OWNER: Various CITY OF REXBURG Americas Family Community PURPOSE: Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map - to change property from Moderate -High Density Residential to Low -Moderate Density Residential PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 84.021 acres PROPERTY ID: See map included with application ROPERTY LOCATION: See map included with application AUTHORITY § 6.13c "Council may adopt or reject an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. " REQUEST Applicant is requesting a land use map designation change from Moderate -High Density Residential to Low -Moderate Density Residential. RECOMMENDATION The NW Platte Neighborhood Association has requested to change the subject property from Moderate -High Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial/Mixed Use to Low -Moderate Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map. The Planning and Zoning Commission should take testimony in the public hearing to determine if this change to the Comprehensive Plan Map is in the best interest of the community. Staff requests that discussion should include the following: 1. Consideration for the NW Platte Neighborhood Association. Including nuisances and safety. 2. Recent changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map in or near the requested change. Why changes were made. Case No 14 00151 Page 1 3. The City of Rexburg Comprehensive Plan Map in general. What is the purpose? Does the map adequately reflect anticipated future growth? If the map is changed in this area, should other areas be changed? Are the proposed changes best for the entire community? 4. How does the request fit in with Envision Madison proposals? 5. How does the request correlate to recent changes to the Development Code including Section 4.16 Infill/Redevelopment Standard? 6. If an area is to be changed, do the boundaries identified meet with the best interests of the community? Case No 14 00151 Page 2