HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUILDING REVIEW SUMMARY - 18-00285 - 2300 University Blvd - Madison High School Stadium - New ConstructionReview
Report
Current Building Review Status: REVISIONS
Application Number: 18-00285Permit Details
Application Received Date: 05/29/2018
Commercial Addition
Application Approved Date:
Application Approved Status: ACPTW/COND
05/29/2018
2300 University Blvd
Madison High School Stadium - New Construction
Status of Plan Reviews Completed
05/29/2018Electrical Review N/A
05/31/2018Public Works Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
06/05/2018Fire Department Review - Site Plan COMPLETED
06/06/2018Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
07/31/2018Plumbing Review RESUBMIT
07/31/2018HVAC Review COMPLETED
07/31/2018Electrical Review REVISIONS
08/01/2018Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
08/01/2018Public Works Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
08/02/2018Building Review REVISIONS
08/08/2018Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan APPW/COND
Permit Review Status
Plan Reviews Still in Progress
Public Works Review - Site Plan
Electrical Review
Public Works Review - Site Plan
Building Review
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS STA TUS
*Please respond to "REVISIONS" status items, with appropriate comment/documentation as needed!
Fire resistance rating of building elements meet
Sect. 704 & Table 601
REVISIONS
Plans note construction to be III-B. This
requires load-bearing structural members on
the outside of the building to have the same fire
resistance rating as exterior bearing walls
(704.10) UNLESS sprinkler protection is
extended under projections as identified in IBC
1406.3, exception 3.
*Revisions Response :
Occupant load is identified on plans as per IBC
Section 1004
REVISIONSNo occupant load provided for spectator
seating. Does "Bleachers by others" mean there
are more plans to be submitted? Cannot
determine code compliance for unidentified
occupant load.
*Revisions Response :
Reviewed By: Quinton Owens
Review Date: 08/02/2018
Plan Review Details
quinton.owens@rexburg.org
Building Review Status: REVISIONS
Page 1 of 3
Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code
Building Review (Continued)
D ESCRIPTIO N CO MMEN TS STATUS
Aisles meet the requirements of IBC Section 1018 REVISIONSNo detailed drawing of grandstand seating.
*Revisions Response :
Assembly Exiting meets the requirements of IBC
Section 1029
REVISIONSNot able to review grandstand seating. No
detailed drawings of assembly seating area are
in plans.
*Revisions Response :
Accessible Entrances are provided as per IBC
Section 1105
REVISIONSDid not find ramp details for access to
bleachers.
*Revisions Response :
Assembly Area Seating meets the requirements
of IBC Section 1108.2
REVISIONSNo detailed drawing of grandstand seating.
*Revisions Response :
Special Inspection Contractor is identified (IBC
1704.2.1)
REVISIONSWho will be performing special inspections?
*Revisions Response :
Amount of Plumbing Fixtures meets the
requirements of IBC Chapter 29
REVISIONS* The note referencing the additional required
restrooms are available inside the high school
implies that the high school will be unlocked
during any event at the stadium for potential
restroom needs. Can this be verified by the
school district? There is also a 500 ft travel
limitation to the restrooms.
* There are only 10 toilets/urinals available
general public men's use while the other
fixtures are in the "team rooms" Estimated
about 4400 occupant load (2200 male/2200
female) for spectator seating without bleacher
details.
*Revisions Response :
Special Inspections are required as per IBC
Chapter 17
COMPLETED
Use classification is identified as per IBC Section
302
Only A-3 occupancy is listed for the Grandstand.
The IBC identifies grandstands as A-5. The
team rooms and other spaces under the
bleachers could be A-3 making the structure a
mixed occupancy. Using the more restrictive A-3
occupancy as shown on plans the Grandstand is
approved as a non-separated, mixed use
occupancy.
COMPLETED
Page 2 of 3
Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code
Building Review (Continued)
D ESCRIPTIO N CO MMEN TS STATUS
Additional Inspector Comments:
Assigned for review 5/29. No stadium plans, only site plans.
Page 3 of 3
Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code