Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWALL PANEL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS - 18-00261 - 1249 Stone Dr - New SFRa SITRUGTURAM� ENGINEERING Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels Report TICAA -%104020A z December q 2009 (Rif 1- 0) Document considered void if corporate seal is not embossed Submitted TJC AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3206 LUYUNG DRIVE RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95742-6830 PHONE [916] 853-9658 FAX [916] 853-9432 This Report is for the exclusive use of Terrapin Testing, Inc. named herein. T3C and Associates, Inc. authorizes Terrapin Testing, Inc. to reproduce this report only if re- produced in its entirety. Main Report Report Cover 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Available Information 3 Approach 4 Findings 7 Conclusion 9 Appendices IFJCAA-A Test Summaries ®1 Transverse 12 ® Racking 15 A.3 Axial 17 ®4 all Connection Tests 19 TIC AA -B MathCAD Output 21 TJCAA-C Calculations CA Transverse 25 ® Racking 27 C3 Axial 30 ®4 Wall Connection Tests 32 TJC and Associates InC. Engineering Analysis of SZP all Panels Revision., 1,0 Approval. Report No. TiCAAS04*20 Zssue Date. 12-03-0977��7 Tic Page 2 of 33 1.0 INTRODUCTION Terrapin Testing, Inc. has conducted a series of transverse, axial, racking shear load, and connection tests for siaanm(s Ho|dinQmLLCon structural sandwich wall panels. The purpose of this report is to evaluate load deflec- tion data developed from the testing program and determine the maximum allowable loads, which may be applied to the subject panels in their in- tended application. AstrucCuna| sandwich panel is an assembly consisting of lightweight core securely laminated between two relatively thin facings (skins). The panels evaluated within this report consist of an expanded polystyrene (EPS) core with a nVminal density of 1.0 pcf and 7/16" OSB skins. Adhesive used to bond the skins tothe core was IS[]GRIP SP3Q3DD adhesive manufactured by Ashland Spec|aityChemical Company, 2.0 AVAILABLE INFORMATION * Panel description, and phymca| properties. w Test Data from transverse load bests used to test the attach- ment- of the subject panels to a typical roof and floor. * Transverse Load Test Dwta: a Series of Data representing the mid -point deflection of each tested panel for a given applied pressure In psf; 0 Maximum applied pressure at panel failure; 0 Type of failure experienced; and a Racking Shear Load Test Data: * Series of data representing deflection at four locations of each tested specimen; * Maximum applied load atfaUumo; and 0 ­Fype of failure experienced, 0 Axial Load Test Data: * Series of data representing "net" axial deformation; * Series of data representing mid -point transverse deflection; * Maximum applied |oad at failure; and i"We of failure experienced. This information has been used asthe basis todevelop anallowable load table and design loads for the tested panels. Engineering Analysis of TJC and Associate�;, Inc. SIP Wall Panels Approval- [�Report No. TJCAA 504020A Zssue Date. 12-0- -09 T3 Page 3 of 33 3.0 APPROACH TRANSVERSE LOAD TESTS Transverse load tests are conducted Lodetermine the maximum trans- verse (perpendicular to panel skin) load that can be applied to the sub- ject panels. TIC and Associates, Inc. developed a proprietary MathCAD template to determine the load deflection relationship for the subject panels. Test- ing data provided by Terrapin Testing, Inc, was used as input for this template. The following is a brief description of the approach and methodology used within the template. Criteria In accordance with the AccePtanoaChtaMafor Sandwich Panels (ACrO4),pub||shedbyI�n �Ev�|u��i�Serv|cea,Inc.thefo||ovvingcrite- riehavebeenusedfordeterminingthemaxirnuma||owab|eepp|ied a Maximum deflection at the mid -point of the subject panels is limited to o predetermined value. For the purpose of this re- port, allowable loads have been evaluated for deflection limits as follows: � Maximum allowable shear load is less than or equal Lothe aver- age of the appropriate ultimate shear load divided by the factor of safety of: 0 3.0 for transverse loads. m Maximum allowable bending load is equal to the average ulti- mate 0 3,0 for transverse loads. • Maximum allowable span is limited to the maximum panel length tested. w Capacity of connection fasteners to resist uplift is based on a factor of safety of 3.0. Determination of E and G Terrapin Testing, Inc. has provided load deflection data for two dis- tinctly different panel spans. Since total deflection is function of both bending stiffness, EI, and shear stiffness, 6, the moment ofinertia of the sandwich panel, l, must be determined before solving for Eand G. The panel's moment ofinertia iscalculated from the known thickness ofthe panel skins and core. Therefore, two equations, one for each span length, with two unknowns can be developed and solved todeter- mine Eand G. Revision: 1.0 Zssue Date/12-03~09 Engineerima Analysismf Wall Panels Approval:]Report��~�7���504020A �C Page 4*f 33 E Determination of Allowable Shear and Bending Terrapin Testing, Inc. has provided both the maximum load applied to each sandwich panel tested and the type of failure (bending, shear or terminated) associated with the maximum applied load. The ultimate bending moment iscalculated using the average ofthe applied loads atfailure for all long span panels. The ultimate shear load is calculated using the average of the applied loads at failure for all short span test panels. Defiection of Panels When calculating the anticipated panel deflection for a given load con- dition, TJCAA has included factors for flexural deformations and shear deformations. Flexural and shear deformations are similar tothose associated with classical beam theory. Develop Load Table Equations are developed to calculate the maximum shear force, mo- ment force and anticipated deflection asafunction ofspan and applied load. Each equation is solved for given span, resulting in the maxi- mum applied load permitted for the allowable shear, moment, and de- flection. The smallest of these three applied loads is considered to be the maximum applied load for the panel given the span under consid- eration. The process outlined above is repeated for all desired spans to develop the allowable transverse load table. RACKZNG SHEAR LOAD TESTS Racking shear load tests are conducted to determine the allowable ion- gitudinal shear loads that can be applied to the subject panels. These loads are typically induced in a panel when acting asavertical shear wall to resist wind and seismic forces. Criteria Procedures set forth in ASTM E-72 were used for determination of "Net" deflections of the tested sheanwa||. The following criteria have been used for determining the maximum allowable applied load. * Maximum allowable shear load is limited tothe average applied load at panel failure divided by a factor of safety of 3.0. m The minimum panel thickness is limited to the thickness of the panels tested. The average load at which all teat specimens failed, divided by the ap- propriate factor of safety, was considered the controlling allowable load based on strength. The allowable load based on strength in pounds per linear foot (p|f) is determined by dividing the controlling allowable load by the length of the test specimen. It should be noted that although the test specimen is 8' tall, the allow- able height for a shear wall panel is not limited to this height. It may be taller provided the appropriate aspect ratios required by the gov- erning jurisdiction are met and appropriate hold-downs are provided to resist uplift of the panel. AXZAL LOAD TESTS Axial load tests are conducted to determine the allowable axial load which can beapplied Lothe subject panels. Axial loads are typically induced by structural elements supported on the end of vertical panel which acts as a wall element. Criteria In accordance with the Acceptance Criteria for Sandwich Panels (AC04), published by ICC Evaluation Services, Inc. the following crite- ria has been used for determining the maximum allowable applied m The minimum thickness of an installed panel is limited to the thickness ofthe panel tested. • The maximum height of an installed panel is limited to the height ofthe panel tested. • The maximum allowable axial load islimited tothe average ax- ial load at failure for all tests divided by a factor of safety of 10. • The maximum axial compression within the panel islimited to 1/8 inch. Determination of Allowable Axial Load Terrapin Testing, Inc. has provided the height and width of the test panels subjected to axial load and the applied loads atwhich each specimen could no longer resist additional applied load. The allowable axial load is determined by dividing the average load at which all specimens failed by the appropriate factor ofsafety. As with the racking shear load {est, the allowable load in pounds per linear foot TJC and Associates., 1� Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels Issue Date., 12-03-09 Tic Page 6 of 33 OTJCA `td Em WALL CONNECTZON TESTS Terrapin Testing, Inc. provided load test data for the attachment of the wall panels to a simulated roof and floor. The failure loads of the tests were provided along with the type of failure for each test. All panels failed through shear at the connection betwen the sH1 pate and trie waH paneL An appropriate factor of safety is applied to the ultimate failure loads to determine the allowable connection load that may be applied to the top and bottom tracks, When determining the maxi- mum allowable transverse load that may be applied to the subject wall panels, the transverse load applied to the top and bottom connections 4"0 FINDINGS The following findings are based on test data provided by Terrapin Testing, Inc. and calculations developed byTJC and Associates, Inc. For a complete explanation of the presented findings, refer to the asso- ciated test report provided by Terrapin Testing, Inc. and the appropri- ate Appendices within this report. Transverse Panel Strength T][and Associates,, Inc. has consolidated the |oad'deOec1iondata us- ing linear regression. This process results in straight lines that repne- sentthe relationship between applied load and panel deflection. Slope (m)and Y-intercept(b)are used todefine the straight line. Appendix T]CAA-A.1 provides asummary ofthe supplied maximum load data and results of the linear regression. As discussed above, a MathC4Qtemplate was utilized todetermine the maximum allowable transverse, shear, and moment forces that can be applied tothe subject panels. Furthermore, the effective modulus of elasticity, E,and the effective shear modulus, G, have been deter- mined for the subject sandwich panels. Table 1 provides summary of the findings developed within the proprietary MathCADtemp|ete. Ap- pend�xT]CAA Bcontains Math[AD output. Short span panels were tested both with and without a core splice. The panels without a core splice were terminated ata lower applied load than those with acore splice. Therefore, the average maximum load applied topanels without acore splice (the lower average applied load) was used when calculating the ultimate and allowable shear within the panel. -- C and Associates, Inc, Engineering Analysis of SrPmall Panels Rexksamn:1.0|VCUApprnrax KReport N�TJCAA 50402� ���� ��e���:��-��~�� � ������of 33 Table I MathCAD Results Summary of Calculations Allowable Panel Shear 221 lbs/ft Allowable Shear at Panel Connection 232 lbs/ft Allowable Panel Bending Moment 1,435 lbs/ft Modulus of Elasticity (E) 825,201 psi Shear Modulus (G) 202 psi Appendix T_'JCAA-(-_. 1 presents calculations used to determine the allow- able transverse loads that may be applied to the subject wall panels. Racking Shear Loads Tests AppendixT]CAA-A.2 provides a summary of test data provided by Ter- rapinTesting, Inc. Table 2 presents the necessary information for de- termination of the allowable applied longitudinal shear load for the subject panel. Panel Parameter Panel Thickness 6.5 inches Panel Height 8 feet - 0 inches Panel Width 8 feet - 0 inches Average Deflection at Panel Failure >1.1 inches Average Load at Panel Failure/ Termination 8,118 lbs i Appendix T]CAA'C.2presents calculations used todetermine the allow- able shear loads in pounds per lineal foot which may be applied to the subject panel. Engineering Analysis of TJC and Associates, Inc. SZP Wall Panels Revision: 1.0 Approval. Report No. TJCAA 504020 Issue Date. 12-03-09 1 KIC Page 8 of 33 Axial lLoad Test A[)pandix provides a summary of the test data provided by Terrapin Testing, Inc T�b|e 3 presents the necessary information for determination of the allowable applied axial load for the subject panel. Panel Para me ter Thickness - 6.5 inches Height 18 feet Width 4 feet Load at Panel Failure at Top of Test Specimen 24333lbs ApAendixT]CAA-C_3presentsca|cu|aMonsusedtodetenminedheaUow- ab!eaxia| loads that may be applied Lothe subject panels with wall heights of 18 feet or less. Wall Connection Tests Appendix T]CAA-A.4provides asummary ofthe weUconnection test data provided by Terrapin Testing, Inc. AppendixT]%'--AA-C.4 presents calculations used todetermine the maximum allowable transverse load that may beapplied tothe top and bottom connections. The calcula- tions are based on data provided by Terrapin Testing, Inc. 5.0 CONCLUSION Upon evaluation ofthe provided test data, the maximum allowable transverse, racking and axial loads have been developed for the sub- ject pends. Detailed information regarding allowable transverse, rack- ing and axial loads is provided within the AppendiceS TICAA-C.1, C.2, and C.3 respectively. TaNe 4 provides a summary of the allowable transverse loads. TJC and Assod, Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels Revision: 1.0 Approval.. Report No. TJCAA 504020 -ic Page 9 of 33 Issue Date. 12-03-09 T �PANIE~S Table 4 sPanels Holdings LLC Wall Panel 3.00 < < Factor of Safety for Shear 300 <<== Factor of Safety for Bending Moment_ 7 Allowable Uniform Applied Load(') (psf) Wall -7 Height Deflection Limit (2) WM n d Load L/180 55 psf 8,0 ft L/240 52 psf L/360 35 psf L/180 44 psf 10,0 ft L/240 38 psf L/360 26 psf L/180 37 psf 1M ft L/240 29 psf L/360 19 psf L/180 30 psf 14O ft L/240 23 psf L/360 15 psf L/180 24 psf 16O ft L/240 18 psf L/360 12 psf L/180 19 psf 1&0 ft L/240 14 psf L/180 17 psf MO ft L/240 13 psf Notes: l) All allowable loads provided are uniform applied loads. Where non-uniform loads are applied tothe panel, an "equivalent" uniform load shall bedetermined for comparison with the values within this table. 2) Deflection Limitations are based on Load Combinations presented inTable 1604.3ofthe Z000and Z0O3 International Building Code (IBC). Engineering Analysis of TJC and Associates In--. I V 11 Panels SIP Wa Revision: 1.0 Report No. TJCAA 50402-0-4 Issue Date. 12-03-09 Page 10 of 33 The allowable shear load that may be applied to the subject panels is `C, 0 The allowable axial load that may be applied to the subject panels is presented in IFC­Id-'"" M111 K-111TIr Maximum Height of Wall F Allowable Axial Load per Foot o f W! dth 18 -foot -tall panel When a wall panel is subjected to both axial and transverse loads, tho allowable load combination shall be limited such that the following fo mula is valid. I When a panel is subjected to both racking and axial loads, the allow- able load combination shall be limited such that the following formula is valid. 591- NV�171 �� 1# � W. Revision: ILO Zssue Date: 12-03-09 InC. Engineering Analysis of SZP all Panels Approval. Report No. TJCAA 504020A Tc .7Page 1 I of 33 'C Appendix TJCAA-A,, Transverse Load Test Summarl Engineering Analysis of TJC and Associates Inc. Eng' SIP Wall Panels Revision., 1.0 Approval: Report No. TJCAA S0402"4 TYC Zssue Date., 12-03-09 7TT Page 12 of 33 Transverse Load Test Data 6. 5 -inch, 7116 " OSB / 1. 0 # EPS / 7116" OSB TJC and Associates Inc. Engineering Analysis of SZP all Panels Revision. 1.0 Approvalf Report No. TJCAA 5040201A Tic Issue Date, 12-03-09 Page 14 of 33 Company: sPanels Holdings LLC Panel Description: 6.5 -inch, 7/16" OSB / 1,0 # FPS / 7/16" OSB TT Job Number: 504020A Ashland ISOGRIP SP3030D Data Su ar "en Loa Set Deflection Appl,ec, Test #4 Test #5 Test #6 Avg ---Test -34 ---Test -35 s v Net Load Load Defl. Load Defl. Load Defl. Load Defl. Set Defl. Set Defl. Set Defl. Set Def - 'a 0.00 0.000 0.000 F 0�000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ,-r --- 26.00 0,176 -0.-154 0.159 07 .007 0.014 -0. 23 -1 0.231 0.243 0 023 0026 7_8.00 0.362 0306 0.307 0.325 0.04 0.033 0.030 0,035 104�00 4" OA40- 6.T61 03M 0.402 0.06 ---0. 04��-- 0.03-5-i �047--- -130 00 6� 0.462 0.472 0.492 0.083 0.050 0.043 0.059 156.0 0.654 0.547 0.550 0.584 0.107 0.067 O.ObO 0.078 Applied Load Deflection Set Deflection Applied Test #7 Test #9 Test #10 Avg Test #7 Test #9 Test #10 Avg C) U Net Load Load Defl. I Load Defl. Load Defl, Load Defl. Set Defl. Set Defl. 10 Set Defl. Set Defl. 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 26.00 0.157 0.149 0.117 0.141 0.014 0.011 0.011 tOO 0.012 0 52.00 -6- - .297 - - 0.2M 07M O -M 0�031 0.012 6-.0 2-5- 0 0.023 0 78.00 406 6320 -----6351 328 6.049 O -M O�035 ir, 0.035 104.00 25 0,404 0.444 0.458 0.066 --M�94 0.037 3 0.052 130.00 0.661 0.501 0.571 0 577 56 0.078 0.076 - - 156�66 0.830 .614 751 1 0. 31 0.069 �.1171 .103 Summary of fest Results Net Slope of Panel Maximum Tested Type of Best Fit Y -Intercept Panel Spans Weight of Weight Tested Loa Load Load Failure Line (psf) (ft.) Panel (lbs.) (psf) (psi (psf/in.) Panel Test 6 100.5 4 .14s 2' i 238.66 Shear 291.77 --25,63- 2 251.9i Shear 34190 -27,14 6 109.0 6 3.38 T 279.76 276.39 Shear 330.05 -23,23 6 108.0 Average 4-6 3.31 258.96 255,65 n/a 320.46 -25.37 n/a 105.8 6 100.0 7 3.13 238.68 235.56 Shear 303,21 -8.94 - -9- 330 223,-0- 8 -219.718-- -----I--24L. ----Shear -18-,60-- 105.5 ---- -ZO-6.63 Shear _?§ 1 213.66 1 -2.57 6 99.0 Avera a 7-10 3,17 X-2-4.29 - 22-1,12 - n/a 1 247.72 n/a 101.5 _Grand Avera a .. 1.24 DjanL a .... _ TJC and Associates Inc. Engineering Analysis of SZP all Panels Revision. 1.0 Approvalf Report No. TJCAA 5040201A Tic Issue Date, 12-03-09 Page 14 of 33 �=Z Revision: 1.0 issue Date. 12-03-09 Engineering Analysis of SZP Wall Panels Report No. TJCAA 5040201A Page 15 of 33 Approval. I Report No. T-ICAA 50402 OWIt Zssue Date: 12-03-09 1 Tic . _ . ., �� i��l _ F r � � . pull , N e � � �, I 1� C� q q 01, 0 a 0 > _0 "01 In 11"!InN '1 -'0, -,,T � -q d C9 1 Ca0 : N ro C) q 0 c), 0 01 0 V) U11 0 0 6 ci� 61 0' 0 00, 00, 00 w 6l 6� 61 001 0 CD ci� 61 6� 6 Oi a t01 gi U') N CRI 01 C�i ` 01 0 01 < i I cl & 0!0 OI 0 0 UI) "n, I -. 1 CO, Go CO _0 -01 M� I M 00 (U a ofC�, of�1 6i 61 61 6 E C > 01 0) CY, U-) 0 61 6, 6l 6 C V) 3 0 2 > I i 01 M, "01 '0 al Ln > > c C', < 7 0 '0i co 0� C)i O O Ca .0 U') Oi 0, a 6� 6, 0; C) U C_ V) Qj > OM C) w0 iO 0 E ch < 01 01 ®' C), 0 0 Ln 'T O zrl01 1, 01 0 0 (ROi C� C) E 01 0, 0 61 0; ®I 0 u CL 0 MI 0 Oq 0 M L%uq CO CN� aw < �u 0 0 cc� 0) c qO C"! '01 '0 = W cli < U') 6 61 ;1 6 0. 75 V) -C U 0it -a CL 2 lt� a M! LnI �01 CO �2 W 01 0� r4 Z C: M a M 0 U z", 00 0 Lf) - < '-?I -�j (:� C�, 1� 01 0 61 06 0 U) IT < N 02 I 001 Ln! z co 'T r, N -2 M 0 Ln Mr 0 fel Q1 L O. .E u 2 0 0 U) (A C:,!0 01 0 01 ol 01 0 0' C5; CD; C) 0 LAI 01 U)! a 3: NO CM L', w. > 0 U a- U') TJC and Associates Znc. Engineering Analysis of L -t� SZP all Panels Revision. 1�0 Approval® Report No. TJ AA 50402"' Issue Date. 12-03-09 Tic Page 18 of 33 1, Engineering Analysis of TJC and Assoc�q Inc. all Panels Report No. TJCAA 5040201 Page 19 of 33 TJC and Associates, Inc. Engineering Analysis of SIP all Panels Revision. 2,0 Approvals Report No. TJCAA 5IJ4020A Issue Date. 12-03-09 —J,C Page 20 of 33 End Connection Test Data 6.5 -inch, 7116" OSB / 1.0 pcf EPS 7116" OSB Test Data for SIP Fasteners Panel Weight Bag length R -of Attachments TJC and Associates, Inc. Engineering Analysis of SIP all Panels Revision. 2,0 Approvals Report No. TJCAA 5IJ4020A Issue Date. 12-03-09 —J,C Page 20 of 33 is of Engineering Analys TJC and Associates, Inc. I SIP Wall Panels Revision: 1.0 Report No. TJCAA S04020A Issue Date: 12-03-09 Page 21 of 33 Panel Span Table sPanels Holdings LLC Panels Tested: August to October 2005 Template Version 2002-04- 6.50- n 002 -04 - 6,50 -inch Wail, 171-116" OSB 1,1,0# Type 1 EPS I "EMV OSB Tnis Mlwhcad Tani pi at e is I,.tI3dea :' �dCteffflnne 'Ae a k-'Siable span,,,: �fejr sanrrwich pae Isnwheri stito, ',ed tc. vePlica! Je a C, anc" hVe V perfieS Of the cianais and tes, �ZIla develovadMne�� �t-, "cadkz' '!,,e ir m " t for Mv� lanels we,,e ejj�e�,tac! tc, imbovahcej, app`Psc C m Design Parameters: -cir csa' qv� 0. It nile , e botmm numiLer ;s f - �,Mi Y x fe-ty V S�iEAR Top niinnbw !is fo. J I Fos`v loads. 3"D Factor &, safetv forKENEDING 70p numbei is the Factur of Safe,%; to t used ,or special toad "aSes Stich FosB --- I - as 10vimd or r12tio Lite Leads, Bottom number is for ail other 1Dad cases sucm, as SmS, Loaas- 3.0 Physical Data: h := 6 50 111 Thxkness of panel DL -Pinel:= 3 20 -Ps' Dead Load o'l Panels t-sP.in 'in Thickness of T, op and Ba4cm Skins ,C.437E,,, VIC and Associates � Engineering Analysis of Znc. SZP Wail Panels Revision. IX Report No. TJCAA 504020AL Zssue Date. 12-03-09 Page 22 of 33 .�. ... e.EL- the--� a .,a_�.�_, .0�. "te_, f .« de ?';,, a at� ,„� k.t,� „Tt11., t. _.eng ,. �- „. ``"e, s i,i_c e ., ,c; t ,-�.�. °. .yi*,a .testa st �.,c _c -.4._ �: j The e „^tib of une ; ane . 2'9 The =eaEi•••• i hic a ..�+,a,_ei a,t!”„, tisk tes� a ,c,„ z tW aiUs a3 1i3si liat?€ Lt i, ».. tt'E,.., �.�, nt tt ..� ..� y ..�y� `� a. _u, ��..� ..1'..�, .,, �.r . � ... uta ,�Yra' ,�.z"g_i v i.'c.�r' 3 ^v ,: sheat,-;„ 3 a *:,,xfw+, fL :: =k;�„t;.� ttai'> ca cua_.Tj s, .h, asp? ,J'th,,, E"i. „E fl= ear regressss� on C de n ae i°, 8, t ,rt the average t'' Da aurves.. I. is the actma. panespan t.,,ervieen, restraints. Not the 1 ,yah ol te pane 'ested.. FTL end , is afe r4 (,shins Used ,k. 9r,1 cale if .i,, majual ,GS' `.,l,.ft., d De a€t,,,udc,;a 'r=x Eit il., c s f,....,z, a :. a... v _r_ Ldi�t v- _ _,. s•:, i t .J .,',is .8.at .rf==t.-.0 J ;cl i -ard s. C if ..tea, should R.,.; I",, .S lmud a . Test Set No. : 1 NL .:: ''�1:idttb er of 't;ng'ests sf FTL. = 1 C.0e G m„. Ei sir e n = �24 E -p f FTL_ 1 �h . ; Y-Si'a`ers"tt t1' Best 3iT L.1•:! 11C ps= FTL, !7 _ .�;-1 erce.. t of Best fit Line i1-1.1 Deten-nine the average failure bad and stiffness of all the panels withm the test. V, moi; u = win(v; 1 k r h ., 3vc = G '.u�psf 3O-na' sn'.,.,,"rt'#-g:a�a :e Si,It2l;?9:Err iia, t it Number of tess is '- Test Set No. 20 `IC Na := s S = Nutnifer of shown tests . � 247.72 2 Dsf— Slope of Best fit Line =236 psf FTS1 11) in _U �sf FT k L := vd.4G res- Y-maerceFt of Best *it Line W _ 232, Usf FTS,_ 3 ` X. -intercept of Best `! Line Determine the iverage, failure x3ad arid stilMess Of all the sands °,vithm the test. g. [nim(w 7j if nw '} °i_a':'a.- _' -s3 c -f Define -ab'� as the —j n;i1"sllt"t7 ass,„�,x a` 2 � Nunn!)e of tests is 2. other-mse um ma 183 '464.1 1psf C44in ft IV-avg Irl ri", ay 413 Psf 247.7 TJC andss Cl tes C�Approvah Engineering Analysis of SZP Wall Panels Revision: 1A Report No. TJCAA 420AZssue Date: 1 -03- Page 23 of 33 uitimate an Ailowatme LO:,11;3S e a r -8 0-35. -3S: - i e ` Wi U, sh-,,Qr Q- ,sem as the since �te on� nels do riot 'yp�cwy failm, s ",h,- maxi, M aW, Jfinnare shear forcc when both tianels �ak In nerding Tne avam-ge Sh-331' of f2HUra '04 -mon the short ppan vs 'ested ozd� ;'16 used as tne altify)xe shear fonae when or nore ",)i .hos oane4s faun shew. T, e alowable she3,- VaRJ& s Tne ni-,,nnale _",ea r furce cio,ced V",8 taMN Of Safet'- -,C-,? Slnaar. Since 'Ns' s ir) ps', ,,, and tvj siM be En of 'ok , ana !�.epiifore, nutV`eSigrl, Sheaf ana Niorient r--,, one ao�a to conve-l' Sneaf to # ane avg -2 1 OW <== Ultimate Shear Based on Shc�' , Span Testing Jli<== Allowable Shear Based on Short Span Testing, AjLd-';n2 Loads, mu� P, N,11 -;1t M4C;v,t:= -OSB I Summary of Calculations: M29W2L2L9Wi= Shear Moduius Ultimate Shear Allowable Shear Ultimate Moment Allowable Moment Ultimate Moment 249 Ba --ed on Lc ---..g Span Testi g - Allowable Moment Pried on Long Span Testing. AAW W - — — — TJC and Associat,,;�s InC. Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall PII anels R Revision. v 1-0 evision. 1.0 Approak Report No. TJCAA 504020A Issue Date. 12-03-09 Tic Page 24 of 33 A Dic Appendix TJCAA- AY Transverse Load Calcula nj TJC and Associates Inc. Engineering Analysis of \\vP WallPaelsRevsion. 1,0 t eport No. TJCAA 504020A Zssue Date. 12-03-09 Page 25 of 33 Allowable Load Calculations Wind Load eel r® �erties Ill l Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels Run —Macm- Set to 0 if no Core Splice Inside - Outside Panel Thickness (in) 6.5 6 5 'Panel Dead Load (psf) Skin Thickness in 2 12 0.438 0 3 8 Core Thickness - c (in) 5,625 MomentofInertia - I (in A 4) 96.5 Skin Modulus of Elastisity - E ,psi) Core Shear Modulus (psi) - G (psi) 5 825201 202 Creep Factor -00 Effective Core Shear Modulus (psi) - G (psi) 202 Ultimate Shear —Based on Panel Strength 664 Ultimate Shear Based on End Conn. 695 Ultimate Shear at Core Splice 695 Factor —of Safety for Shear Allowable —Shear (Fbs) ___3.00 221 Ultimate Moment (ft -lbs) 4306 Factor of Safety for Bending 3.00 Allowable Bending Moment (ft -lbs) Flexural Stiffness (5*1728 / 384 * EI) 1435 2.8E-07 Shear Stiffness (1/ 4*( i+c)*G) 1.0E-04 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion--- Delta Temperature DL Reduction to Resist Applied Forces 0.0000017 N/A -— 0 -- Added DeadLoad0 Allowable Applied Load based on: Panel TJC and Associates Inc. Ill l Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels RevisiVIII on. 1.0 Approval. Report No. TJCAA 5040201 Zssue Date. 12-03-09 Klc Page 26 of 33 Deflection Limit Deflect• 44 psf 38 psf 29 psf 0.93 0,47 �M 14 psf 1 sf TJC and Associates Inc. Ill l Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels RevisiVIII on. 1.0 Approval. Report No. TJCAA 5040201 Zssue Date. 12-03-09 Klc Page 26 of 33 TJC and Associates Inc. � Engineering Analysis of SIP Wall Panels ReVIII von. 1.0 Report No. TJCAA 504020 Issue Date. 12-03-09 Page 27 of 33 Company: sPanels Holdings LLQ Deflection Limit 0.125 0.250 0375 — Panel Description: 6.5 -inch, 7/16" OSB / 1.0 pcf EPS 7/16" OSB Slope (1/8" - 5/8") 4,166 3,282 Ashland ISOGRIP SP 3030D 2,275 Y -Int. (1/8" - 5/8") 216 Height of Wall 618 650 0 _j Load at Defl. Limit 737 Length of Panel 8,0 f .. 1,501 1,787 ;Test Load at Defl. Limit 92 Area of Piston 0, 9 90 n, 198 223 Pre -Load 100 psi 99 Vf Allowable Loads Test 1 Test2 3 Average – Failure Pressure (psi) 7,900 8,200 8,200 Preload Pressure (psi) 100 100 100 0) Failure Load (lb) 7,920 8,217 8,217 !8,�1�1 8 C: Failure Load (lb/ft) 990 1,027 1,027 1,0151 1,01 4-j UO Factor of Safety -300 10 M Allow Load (Strength) 2,640 2,739 2,739 Load (lbs/ft) 330 342 342 338 -Allow Slope at 1/8" defl. 4,545 4,000 4,878 .0 Y -Int. at 1/8" Defl. 190 191 168 4-J 00 U - Q) Deflection Limit 0.125 0.125 0.125 -4 ;�_- Q) Load at 1/8" Defl. (lbs) 759 69 _L — 778 Load at 1/8" Defl. 95 :861 LLJ_ 9 7 1 93 1 1, 7, • Approval: I Report No. TJCAA 504020A issue Date: 22-03-09 1 rx Deflection Limit 0.125 0.250 0375 — 0.500 U) 0 > 'Z� Slope (1/8" - 5/8") 4,166 3,282 2,355 2,275 Y -Int. (1/8" - 5/8") 216 344 618 650 0 _j Load at Defl. Limit 737 _1,165 1,501 1,787 Load at Defl. Limit 92 146 198 223 1, 7, • Approval: I Report No. TJCAA 504020A issue Date: 22-03-09 1 rx 0 06 250 200 150 100 50 Figure 1 Applied Load vs. Net Deflection 0.000 0.125 0.250 0.375 0.500 Net Deflection (inches) TJC and Associate Inc. Engineering Analysis of SZP all Panels Revision. 1.0Report ®o TJCAA S04020 tApproval. ,issue Date: 12-03-09 Tic Page 29 of 33 'P A N EL!, Appendix TJCAAim iF Axial Load Calculat ni TJC and Associates Inc. Engineering Analysis of SZP Wall Panels Revision. 1,0 7n Approval: Report No. TJCAA 504020A Issue Date. 12-03-09 Tic Page 30 of 33 Determination of Axial Load Company: Panel Description: sPanels Holdings LLC 6.5 -inch, 7/16" ®SO / 1.0 pcf EPS / 7/16" OSB Ashland IS®GRIP SP 3030D w/Core Splice at Mid -Height Piston Area (in"2) Test 1 3 s. Test 2 3, 14 Test 3 16 Average Wall Width (ft) 4 - 4 4 _ Wall Height (ft) 13 13 13 Panel Weight (lbs) 250 251 250 System Weight (lbs) 244 244 244 Weight above top plate (lbs) 61x5 61.5 6145 Neutral Load (lbs) 494 495 494 Preload (psi) 250 2S0 250 Pre -Load (lbs) 735 735 735 _ Failure Pressure (psi) 8200 7750 7700 _ Failure Load (lbs) 25761 24347 24190 Applied Load at top plate (lbs) 25329 23914 23753 24333 Applied Load at top plate (plf) 6332 5973 5939 6033 Factor of Safety 3_.0 340 3.0 Allowable Load (lbs) 3443 7971 7919 $311 Allowable Load (plf) 2111 1993 1930 2028 Note: Values are based on Strength of panel. Allowable Axial loads shall be limited to not more than the capacity of the fasteners. Neutral Load is the load applied by the piston to support the specimen and all moving plates Associates,TJC and Engineering Analysis of SIE Wall Panels Revision® 1,0 Approval; Report No. TJCAA 5040202.4 Issue Date. 12-03-09 Tic Page 31 of 33 Appendix TJCAA-C.4 Wall connection Tests T c R JC an Assosion. evi Issue Date;Z » 0 Enineering Analysis �Of SZ, P WallPanels RePort NO. TJCAA 5040201,1, gPage 32 of 33 'PA'NELS End Connection Calcuiations sPanels Holdings LLC - November 2005 Panel Weight T Th 73.0 7 2. 1 b Panel Width 48 in f8 ai Panel Length 48 in 48 in A - 48 in Dead Load Panel 4,66 psf 456 p s-,' 4.53 psf 458 psf Support Spacing 48 in 48 in 48 i n Overhang (Front) (in) 0 0 0 Overhang (Back) (in) _0 0 BaQ lencith 48 i, 4 48 in Mi # of Attachments 4 4 4 0) Failure Pressure (in of H2II 7M in 63.1 in 69.6 in it Failure Pressure (in psf) 3666 328J psf 361.9 psf 352 psf Load at Support 2896 1 s 2588 lbs 2859 lbs 781 lbs Load per Attachment 724 lbs 647 lbs 71 1 s 695 lbs Factor of Safety 3 3 Factor NJ 1 Allow. Load per Attachment 241 lbs 216 lbs 238 lbs 232 lbs Spacing of Attachments Allowable Header Load 12 241 lb/ft 2 in 216 lb/ft 12 �n —J 238 1 b/ft 232 lb/ft EngiI III neerin111 II g Analysis of TJC and Associates, Inc. SIP Wall P Revision. 1.0 Report No.anels TJCAA 504020s'. issue Date: 12-03-09 Page 33 of 33