HomeMy WebLinkAboutREVIEWS PUBLIC WORKS - 17-00801 - 2300 University Blvd - Madison High School - AdditionReview
Report
Current Public Works Review - Site Plan Status: REVISIONS
Application Number: 17-00801Permit Details
Application Received Date: 01/02/2018
Commercial Addition
Application Approved Date:
Application Approved Status: ACPTW/COND
01/02/2018
2300 University Blvd
Madison High School - Addition
Status of Plan Reviews Completed
02/27/2018Electrical Review COMPLETED
02/28/2018Building Review REVISIONS
03/12/2018HVAC Review COMPLETED
03/12/2018Plumbing Review COMPLETED
03/27/2018Fire Department Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
03/27/2018Public Works Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
04/03/2018Public Works Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
04/03/2018Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan COMPLETED
04/05/2018Building Review COMPLETED
04/12/2018Fire Department Review - Site Plan REVISIONS
Permit Review Status
Plan Reviews Still in Progress
Public Works Review - Site Plan
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS STA TUS
*Please respond to "REVISIONS" status items, with appropriate comment/documentation as needed!
Plans are approved for a footing/foundation
ONLY permit?
YES
Sewer: Manhole placement REVISIONSManhole must be at intersection of existing
sewer line (DONE).
Site plan shows 8" sewer runs along East
building perimeter and plumbing shows 4",
manhole is required at North end if 8". If 4"
sewer line on East side, tie in prior to manhole
on South side.
*Revisions Response :
Storm : Drainage calcs N/A
Site Lighting : Photometric layout N/A
Parking Lot : Drainage N/A
Parking Lot: Accessibility/layout N/A
Reviewed By: Joel Gray
Review Date: 04/03/2018
Plan Review Details
joel.gray@rexburg.org
Public Works Review - Site Plan Status: REVISIONS
Page 1 of 2
Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code
Public Works Review - Site Plan (Continued)
D ESCRIPTIO N CO MMEN TS STATUS
Sewer: Line size/slope/type materials 10 ft separation must be maintained between
potable and non potable water lines.
COMPLETED
Page 2 of 2
Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code