Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW REVIEW - 17-00145 - 366 Dividend Dr - Monkey Bars - AdditionReview Report Current Public Works Review - Site Plan Status: REVISIONS Application Number: 17-00145Permit Details Application Received Date: 03/27/2017 Commercial Addition Application Approved Date: Application Approved Status: APPROVED 03/27/2017 366 Dividend Dr Monkey Bars - Addition Status of Plan Reviews Completed 03/28/2017Electrical Review REVISIONS 03/28/2017Public Works Review - Site Plan REVISIONS 03/29/2017Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan REVISIONS 03/29/2017Fire Department Review - Site Plan N/A 03/29/2017Building Review REVISIONS 03/30/2017Electrical Review COMPLETED 04/03/2017Plumbing Review COMPLETED 04/03/2017HVAC Review REVISIONS 04/03/2017Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan REVISIONS 04/03/2017Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan REVISIONS Permit Review Status Plan Reviews Still in Progress Public Works Review - Site Plan Building Review HVAC Review Planning and Zoning Review - Site Plan DESCRIPTION COMMENTS STA TUS *Please respond to "REVISIONS" status items, with appropriate comment/documentation as needed! Street REVISIONSTrash Enclosure needs to be completed. *Revisions Response : Water REVISIONSWater line from phase 1 must have contractor to install and acceptable completion date set prior to issuing building permit. No certificate of occupancy will be issued until it is completed. *Revisions Response : Storm REVISIONSWhere will storm water be stored on site? *Revisions Response : Plans are approved for a footing/foundation ONLY permit? NO Street N/A Lighting N/ANo site lighting on plans. Reviewed By: Joel Gray Review Date: 03/28/2017 Plan Review Details joel.gray@rexburg.org Public Works Review - Site Plan Status: REVISIONS Page 1 of 2 Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code Public Works Review - Site Plan (Continued) D ESCRIPTIO N CO MMEN TS STATUS Water N/AWater will be continued from phase 1. Sewer N/ANo Sanitary sewer on plans. Page 2 of 2 Approval of plans does not constitue approval of variance from code