HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z MINUTES MAY 21, 2009Planning & Zoning Minutes
May 21, 2009
12 North Center Phone: 208.359.3020
Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208.359.3022
Commissioners Attendin
Winston Dyer — Chairman
Thain Robinson Richie Webb
Dan Hanna Ted Hill
Gil Shirley
C I TY OF
REXBURG
America's Fatuity Community
City Staff and Others:
Rex Erickson — City Council Liaison
Val Christensen — Building Official
Natalie Powell — Compliance Officer
Elaine McFerrin - Secretary
Chairman Dyer opened the meeting at 7:02 pm. He welcomed everyone to the meeting.
Building Official Val Christensen represented staff, as Planning and Zoning Administrator Gary
Leikness was not able to attend the meeting.
Roll Call of Planning and Zoning Commissioners:
Gil Shirley, Richie Webb, Winston Dyer, Thaine Robinson, Ted Hill, Dan Hanna
Charles Andersen, Nephi Allen, Josh Garner, and Mary Ann Mounts were excused.
Minutes:
1. Planning and Zoning meeting - May 7, 2009
Thaine Robinson motioned to approve the Planning & Zoning minutes of May 7, 2009. Gil
Shirley seconded the motion.
Richie Webb and Dan Hanna abstained for not having been present.
None opposed. Motion carried.
Public Hearings:
7:05 pm - Rezone —Evan and JoAnn Nef — 208 East 3'd South — LDR2 to MDR1
Chairman Dyer explained the procedure that is followed for public hearings. First, the applicant or
a representative will present the proposal. The Commission will then ask clarifying questions about
the proposal and may also ask staff clarifying questions. The public will be given the opportunity to
speak. When public input is closed, the Commission will deliberate and try to make a decision.
JoAnn Nef, 208 East 3`d South, owner and applicant, presented the proposal. They were granted a
Comprehensive Plan Map change for this property several months ago with the intent of having
dormitory housing (6 singles) in the basement. This P&Z Commission had some concerns with the
change and recommended denial. The City Council decided to give them a chance to address the
neighbors' and the Commission's concerns. They spoke with many of their neighbors who
expressed frustration about changes in general, about feeling strong-armed by the University, about
parking, and about traffic issues. The hLffi appreciate these concerns; they are important.
Consequently, the Nefis came up with a compromise they feel helps solve the problem of having a
single family home right next to and without any buffer from, a high density building along an
arterial road. They dropped the idea of renting the basement to single community members, and
came up with the idea of putting two couple -type apartments in the basement, with a family on the
main floor. They met with several neighbors, who seemed positive about this idea. The Nefs took
them on a tour of the house to show how the downstairs apartments would be set up, where the
entrances would be, and how the parking would be in the rear, coming off 2"d East instead of 3`d
South, which is what their neighbors wanted. Their neighbors have the right to change their minds.
At this neighborhood meeting and follow-up since then, they expressed that having 2 couples in the
basement was much more palpable than 6 single renters.
Therefore, the Nefs are requesting a zone change for the subject property from Low Density
Residential 2(LDR2) to Medium Density Residential 1 (MDR1) with the intended use of the building
to be converted to a 3-plex. For the peace of mind of the neighbors, this zoning does not allow
dormitory use. That would take another step which would include a public hearing for a Conditional
Use Permit. That is not their intent.
JoAnn Nef stated that a proposed parking plan was included with their rezone application. Evan
Nef met with John Millar to review the plan. There is plenty of room for parking as well as a turn-
around.so residents will not have to back out on 2"d East but can exit face fust. There will be grassy
area, a BBQ area, and a garden. The parking in the rear would not be visible from 3'd South due to
some beautiful trees. The Nefs strongly -support a no- street parking policy along 3'd South. They
would encourage it along 2"d East as well.
It has been said that no great community was ever formed without compromise. They are not deaf
to the Commission's concerns and their neighbors' wishes. Their application supports a nice
neighborhood feel that the neighbors want, and it helps solve a planning concern.
Chairman Dyer said making a zoning change on a particular piece of property does not include the
site plan as part of the proposal, although presenting the site plan was informative. The proposal is
just for the zone change. He asked if they were open to a conditional approval of a zoning change.
Mrs. Nef said very much so.
Chairman Dyer asked if dormitory style housing was still a possibility for them, because due to the
University's new policy, they would not be able to receive approval for such housing.
Mrs. Nef said it is definitely not a possibility, due to the concerns of their neighbors. They care
about their neighbors.
Chairman Dyer asked Mrs. Nef if the Neighborhood Association had been consulted about the
proposal and if so what their feelings were.
Mrs. Nef stated that someone from the 3`d East Neighborhood Association was the only one
involved in meeting with the Nefs, although this property is not a part of that Association, but is
close to it. The president of the Association expressed support, but this support was his personal
opinion.
Chairman Dyer said this Commission did not recommend approval to City Council for their
Comprehensive Plan Map change application. City Council determined that it was an appropriate
change and granted it. He asked JoAnn Nef to summarize why that decision was made.
oAnn Nef stated that the City Council was not deaf to the P&Z Commission's concerns, but
recognized that there was a conundrum with this property. A 3 -story apartment complex had been
allowed next to a single family home without a buffer, as well as 2" East being an arterial roadway.
She said she felt the compromise of 6 girls in the basement was positive; the neighbors did not. The
City Council approved the map change, but the Nefs changed their development plans to the
current idea of a 3-plex, to address their neighbors' concerns.
Dan Hanna asked if this property was outside the PEZ (Pedestrian Emphasis Zone) Zone.
It is adjacent to, but outside of the PEZ Zone.
Richie Webb asked if properties to the South and the East of the subject property were all
residential with no converted homes.
JoAnn Nef said there are nice single and couple housing along Harvard Avenue.
The area was shown on the overhead screen.
Thaine Robinson asked if this proposal is an appropriate zone change for what the Comprehensive
Plan designates.
The Comprehensive Plan shows a Medium Density designation for this property.
Chairman Dyer asked Val Christensen for any clarifying information for the Commission.
Val Christensen noted that Gary Leikness' Planning staff review stated that the submitted site plan
should not be considered in the Commission's review of the requirements for this zone change.
Chairman Dyer cautioned the Commissioners that they would not be approving the site plan or the
details of the described use. Once the property is rezoned to MDR1 then any use or conditional use
allowed in that zone may go forward, unless the Commission stipulated conditions on the zone
change.
Evan Nef said the highest they could go for in this zoning is a 4- unit complex. They do not intend
to do this.
Chairman Dyer opened the public input portion of the hearing.
In Favor: None
Neutral:
Brent Barker 231 East 3`" South, stated he is both neutral and opposed. He thinks the world of the
Nefs. They are trying to do what will work in the neighborhood and what will still work for them.
The Nefs informed the Barkers that their plan was for 3 families in the home He and his wife are
worn down with the talking and meetings, and he is tired of the situation. He feels if 3 families are
there, it is a lot easier for him to accept than 6 students.
Opposed:
Brent Barker 231 East 3' South, read a letter from neighbor Gayle Taylor, 275 Harvard, who
opposes the rezone proposal.
D C WE D
MAY 2 1 2009 Gayle Taylor
275 Harvard Avenue
CITY OF REXBURG Rexburg, Idaho 83440
May 20, 2009
ro Whom it may concern:
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Rexburg, Idaho
Dew Council Members,
In the past, I have actively participated in the planning and zoning meetings
regarding a zone change for the address; 208 East 3"' South, owned by Evan and loan
Nei I have voiced my opinion several times and have asked the council to please consider
greatly the neighbors who reside in the surrounding area and to please help us maintain
our existing family neighborhood I have not changed my mind about that.
A short time ago, Mu And Nhs. Nef'invited several neighbors to theahome to
show us thea new proposal for further plans to get rezonning to develop thea property.
Mr. Nef'called me after that meeting and we had a short discussion. He said, "It
sounds lice you are not in favor ofthe new proposal plan?" (Two units in the basement
for a couple nd anther for a couple and maybe a child. Ihen another unit upstahs for a
family).
I told him that was right. I was realty not in favor of it because of the several
problems that will still exist. I have discussed those reasons before and I discussed them
again with him, including some problems I we that might occur in the development.
He has since visted in my home by appointment regarding an item needed for a
science project for his daughter. Again he asked me to consider that proposal.
I told him I was getting weary ofthe continual process we are having to go
through. In the beginning I told them they would not Ike what I was going to say at the
fast meeting and did they not know the problems they would have icgarding this
property? They said then, that they were aware of it. Again he tried to convince me of
why I should accept it as it would be good for the value of my own property.
I have considered it smce, and I have not changed my mind from the first
statements I have made before. I want to maintain our neighborhood as it is now, a Low
Density Residential Area.
I ask you? Do we m Home Owners not have some rights to protect our own
property from those who come into out area to buy up property for housing development?
Do we have to form a Home Owners Association to keep this from happening7
Before I asked the Council to please consider keeping the area as it is. This does
not mean that there is anything personal against the Nef Family. I have always said how
mucb we rejoiced to have thea family move into our neighborhood. Now we know that
they do not intend to five here at all. We are sorry to hem that, as we have grown to love
them and thea cbildren. I have spent many happy hours with them as they have visited
me. I thank them for that.
As far as I know this has been a fairly peaceful happy neighborhood with neighbors
concerned for each other. I have become weary, over this problem I told Nk. Nef that I
would not be to this meeting because of a prior commitment, but my opinion stands.
���
4
RobertJimison, 255 Harvard. His objection is based on this property being a gateway to the
neighborhood. He wants to keep the neighborhood as low density residential and family. It is not so
much a case of who the owners of the property are now but rather its future use no matter who
buys it. They are concerned that the proposed rezone would be an encroachment into the
neighborhood.
Douglas Hancey, 378 Yale. He thought the Yd East Homeowners Association had drafted a letter
or petition saying they were against this proposal. He is against it. The Porter family owned the
property for a long time and kept it up very well. As one entered the neighborhood, it looked very
nice. He strongly opposes this change and feels this proposal is one more creep of rental properties
into the neighborhood. He would like the integrity of the neighborhood to remain.
CarlaJimison, 255 Harvard, is against this zone change request. As far as she is aware, there are only
four homes on Harvard that have basement apartments that have been grandfathered in. She is
concerned with what will happen to the subject property if it is sold. It is a very key home, the
gateway, as one comes into this neighborhood. She grew up close to a university in Michigan and
saw zone changes slowly creep and envelop neighborhoods. She does not want to see that happen
here. It is a wonderful neighborhood; neighbors do care about each other. She would like to keep it
a family neighborhood.
Rachel Peck 323 South 3'd East, is opposed to a zone change. She is not in favor of spot zoning.
There is an apartment complex to the south that is not kept up in the same standard as the homes in
the area. There is a rental home northeast of their home, and it is obvious it is a rental home. She
has never seen a rental home or a rental area that is kept up as nicely as individual homeowners keep
their homes. She is opposed because the upkeep would be dubious. She is opposed because there
will be visitors coming and going. Will there be plans made for parking or for curfew? Does the
community have a say in what activities would or would not be allowed if the renters are young
married couples? Why are we considering a zone change when there is already surplus rental housing
here in Rexburg? Mrs. Peck said she does not see this proposal as a necessary zoning change.
David Peck 323 South 3`d East. He is Vice President of the 3`d East Neighborhood Home
association, but he is not representing them tonight. The Association has not had a meeting to
address this issue completely. He is not weary of this issue, because he feels this proposal affects the
neighborhood and the quality of life of the residents. Rexburg is America's Family Community. He
feels one must be careful in the use of representations of people that are not present or have not
written their views. He has attended City Council meetings, and the number one goal of the
Comprehensive Plan is to preserve the existing character of the community and neighborhoods
within the community. This proposal does not go with that value. The gateway issue of the property
is a concern. Integral to preserving a community is letting people know when they enter a residential
area. This is not about the Nefs• it is not about the use of the property; it is about the property and
preserving existing communities. The property may prove problematic to investors. People make
poor investments all the time. It is not the responsibility of the P&Z Commission or City Council to
compensate for someone else's poor investment decisions. Mr. Peck is concerned about the idea of
a restrictive use. What restrictions will there actually be? He does not see this proposal as a
compromise. Earlier the neighborhood association was also opposed to the proposal for a Bed and
Breakfast. In summary, he agrees with the safety and visitor concerns; he expressed opposition to
any restriction, which he feels makes the problem worse. He reiterated that this issue is about the
property, not about the use. Focus on the property, not the proposed use. The zoning is there for a
reason. Changing the zoning would not support the values of the Comprehensive Plan nor the
interests of the area.
Corinne Barker, 231 East 3M South. She is in opposition to this rezone proposal. When they moved
here 25 years ago, the area was a family neighborhood, and they have raised a family there. If a crack
in the door is allowed, the door is going to swing wide open. Provo, Utah has such an area near
the college, where homes have deteriorated from how they once were. She is afraid the change will
creep into her way of life.
Written Input:
Letter from Gayle Taylor — opposed to the proposal - read earlier in this meeting by Brent Barker.
Letter (electronic) from David Ward — opposed to the proposal — read aloud by Chairman Dyer.
Letter (electronic) from lannaLee Ward — opposed to the rezone — read aloud by Chairman Dyer
pmn: Mavtl Wvd ldhmlgeabmn...1
Bml: Thu�odH. 2"iM I.MPM
To: FbIro M6enN
guq.el: fRsaJsg of Nel WOgR,
With regard t0 reeming the wed Peon-ty, 300 Fast led South:
I we definitely not to favor of this and I believe ¢hanging the ¢ming of this property will
open the Way far future "'o bl., to be teemed and used for student housing. This Will be
a great detriment to the resmenun ewnnity Of this neighborhood.
Thank you for your serious eonsideratim in this natter.
slar.rmy.
Bavid L. Ward D
me NarviM Avenue yAt Z ,yam D
du.
CIryBpRIXBURB
Flan: darvaisawrdfynnakaewruseremtl
T. tease %21,2,091'al PH
Suhjanl: NNNReeAsfcwFy Pesmly
H[M1 regards to rezoning of Mef pryerty, 303 E. 3rd In.:
I da not agree with the re.i, of this property to be allured to be Anything more that a
single family residence. This home Is at the edge of the residential community directly east
of BW -Idaho Confess which is a gran family area. W have watched as older homes along and
South have been bought up and converted to student Musing parry tines to become eyesores and
mot cared for. It appears when single students wove Into older homes, wmertef for their
was, families move Wt dM psvpertles and netghbofh ods deteriorate.
Min area is the only residential area that he, resin fairly intact along Me BW -I
4wndarles. (CWnder College Avenue, nwM) Apartments and business district, West; fan
and residential areas, -
south.) mere are planes a places that Investors can put their foods to help Accommodate
housing for single students, if that Is their desire. It is Inappropriate for potential
investors to purchase a home, live In it only long enough to gat zoning changed, renal then
leave the long tem residents of the community to live with an influx a students aM
generally no manner wed is no longer around.
Please consider that a vote against this rezoning 1s a In In -favor of our fatly c..ity
and the residents that have spent years hem and W wt wish to see this change.
Thank you,
lamaiee Mord D
349 Harvard Avenue
4AYZY D
CIryOfRIXBBR�
Rebuttal;
JoAnn Nef - She appreciates the homeowners' concerns; they are valid and important. She is
befuddled because she feels she and her husband are promoting the same values. They are not
asking to put in a Maverick, or a bed and breakfast, or an alumni house, or single student housing.
They recognize this home has been a gateway for the neighborhood. They have worked very hard
to come up with a solution to a problem, to make sure this property is still a gateway. They are
trying to solve an issue. It is a beautiful home and property, but it is not a great place to raise your
children. The house was a disaster when they bought it. It is beautiful and well taken care of now.
She feels what they have presented is a perfect solution. It would still be a family home. There would
be plenty of parking in the back. Visitors could park in the horseshoe driveway. The Nefs are the
only family that has lived at this property since the Kensington properties were built. Change is
hard. This Rezone proposal would allow the opportunity to make it right for this property.
Chairman Dyer closed the public input portion.
Chairman Dyer asked David Peck for clarification (only yes or no answer) on whether the 3`d
East Neighborhood Association had submitted any material to the City in regard to this rezone
proposal.
Mr. Peck answered no.
Chairman Dyer asked City Council Liaison Rex Erickson to clarify the Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment approval decision for this property that was granted by City Council.
Councilman Erickson stated the Comprehensive Plan map change allows whoever owns the
property to make the request for a rezone. There was a lot of discussion by City Council of this
particular property. A good share of the homes on 2"d East in that area currently have basement
apartments.
Several Comprehensive Plan map amendment requests were on the agenda at this meeting, and it
appeared they were all decided under one vote.
Chairman Dyer asked Val Christensen for input.
Val Christensen stated the question is whether the Commission feels this particular property, after
going through a Comprehensive Plan Map change, should be allowed a rezone. He stated that lot
size needed for MDR1 is 4500 square feet for the l" unit, with 1500 square feet for every unit
thereafter.
The Commissioners discussed the proposal.
Chairman Dyer stated there has been careful thought and preparation given in the input by both
sides on this proposal issue. He expressed the Commission's appreciation for this input.
Ted Hill was concerned with the parking issue.
Dan Hanna said every family in every neighborhood has visitors that need to park temporarily on
the street.
Thaine Robinson said the decision has to be made looking several years into the future and not for
the moment. From a good planning perspective, to protect the neighborhoods, he thought he would
be against this proposal.
Chairman Dyer stated there was quite a discussion of this property at the comprehensive plan map
change request level. The Commission did not recommend approval to City Council on that request.
He said the question before the Commission tonight is, shall a zone change be allowed, and if so,
will there be conditions placed on it to make it more appropriate for the neighborhood?
The Commission looked at the permitted uses listed in the Development Code 926 document.
Ted Hill expressed he could support this proposal if there is no change in the building footprint.
Dan Hanna said the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment change that was granted on this
property paves the way for a zone change approval. If they go against this they would be going
against the Comprehensive Plan.
Chairman Dyer stated the Commission is not forced or mandated to make a zone change based on
what the Comprehensive Plan Map says. They are required to make sure that the decisions they
make are not in violation of the Comprehensive Plan. The LDR2 zoning is a presently existing use
that could continue. The door has been opened to consider this zone change request because of
what the land use map now says.
The foreseen use for the subject property on the Preferred Land Use map is medium density
residential.
Two families would be an allowable use in the existing LDR2 zoning
Richie Webb stated that at the City Council meeting he attended several months ago regarding this
property and the requested Comprehensive Plan Map change, there was concern about the negative
feedback from neighborhood members. The City Council wanted to give the applicant the
opportunity to work through some of those concerns. Mr. Webb said the Comprehensive Plan
change opened the door; he feels the applicant has done a good job in addressing concerns of the
neighborhood. What was presented tonight is a much better plan than what was originally proposed
He commends the Nefs for the effort they have put into this proposal.
There was more discussion.
Dan Hanna said whether or not they like a proposal, a permitted use is still a permitted use
Chairman Dyer stated the Commissioners' charge is to consider the proposal, the merits of it on
the basis of the law (Comprehensive Plan), its impact on the neighborhood, and its consistency with
surrounding land uses. The P&Z Commission's decision is a recommendation; the proposal would
go to City Council for the final decision.
Councilman Erickson, after reviewing the September 3, 2008 City Council minutes, stated the City
Council looked carefully at the Comprehensive Plan Map change request. Each Council member
had his say on the request, as well as input given by City Attorney Stephen Zollinger. The idea was
to eventually have a total of 6 girls as renters on the property. If the City wanted to create a buffer
with this corner lot, between the high density residential to the south and the low density residential
to the east, they could make the change to the Comprehensive Plan map and see if the applicant
could come forward with a proposal the City would allow. Changing the density on the
Comprehensive Plan map does not allow this to happen; it only allows the opportunity to request a
change.
The Commissioners had further discussion.
There was some discussion about having 3 families in the home and the impact there might be on
the surrounding neighborhood.
A permitted use could be up to 4 families in an MDR1 Zone
Richie Webb said perhaps one such change may not have major impact on the neighborhood, but
if this request created more requests, there may be a greater impact.
Dan Hanna motioned to recommend the zone change for 208 East 3' South from Low Density
Residential Two (LDR2) to Medium Density Residential One MDR1, to City Council including the
conditions that there be no change in the footprint of the present building, that there be no more
than 3 dwelling units, and that the applicant submit an appropriate parking plan, site plan, and floor
plan for City staff review, and that there be no more than 4 parking spaces in addition to the existing
2 -car garage. Ted Hill seconded the motion. Dan Hanna amended his motion to include that if
plans are not submitted to and approved by the City within 12 months, the property will revert back
to the original zoning. Ted Hill seconded the amended motion.
Then Commissioners discussed the motion.
It was thought that such a motion would be an allowable result of the Comprehensive Plan map
change, but with conditions that would be protective to the neighborhood and the situation as
addressed by the citizens tonight.
Those in Favor Those Opposed
Dan Hanna Winston Dyer
Ted Hill Thaine Robinson
Richie Webb Gil Shirley
Motion did not carry.
Chairman Dyer declared an impasse on this proposal. The application to change the zoning failed;
the Commission cannot send up its support of the requested application to the City Council.
The Nef Rezone proposal will now go before the City Council for their consideration.
Unfinished/Old Business: None
New Business: None
Compliance:
Compliance Officer Natalie Powell reported on the semi -truck parking compliance issue that was
brought up at the previous P&Z meeting. The problem of 2 semis parking on the city streets for a
few days at a time has been addressed. Crapo Trucking, owner of the trucks, was notified. They put
a memo in with each of their drivers' paychecks that stated that the trucks needed to be off city
streets for safety reasons and to be in compliance with the City parking ordinance.
Parking on both sides of Barney Dairy Road during evening ballgames at the high school was a
compliance issue that was raised at the previous P&Z meeting. This parking was making the street
very narrow for traffic. Natalie Powell spoke with the City's Public Works Director, John Millar.
"No parking" signs were on the north side at one time but were removed for a project. They will
now be put back up.
Staff continues to work with the owner on the clean-up of the DJ Barney property. A
representative for the Baker Trailer Park came in to the Community Development Department with
the resident's concerns about the DJ Barney property. The owner is moving forward.
Val Christensen stated there are some projects that go on for a long time. He suggested there be a
completion time fine set, for instance for foundation, screening, landscaping, etc.
10
The Commission would like to discuss this issue with City Attorney Stephen Zollinger at a future
P&Z meeting.
There was further discussion.
Dan Hanna wondered if, as part of the City's ordinance, a temporary fence could it be put up at
construction sites for catching building debris.
Val Christensen said there are some environmental regulations currently in place concerning
screening for wind purposes so soils are not lost, etc. Those fences would also catch building debris.
An upset business owner contacted a P&Z Commissioner with concerns about dumpster enclosures
and locations. The business owner had stated that he was forced to put up the enclosure and was
angry that the dumpster was not put back into the enclosure after being dumped by the sanitation
crew. Natalie Powell was also aware of this situation and stated that the issue has been resolved. It
was found that the enclosure was never properly attached to the asphalt; therefore, when the wind
blew, the enclosure traveled across the parking lot. She also notified the owners of several vehicles
that park overnight next to the dumpster, blocking it and making it impossible to pick it up. She
asked them not to park so close to the dumpster so that it can be reached and picked up safely.
Non controversial Items Added to the Agenda:
1. Mixed Use Zones discussion — to continue at future meeting
2. Conditional Use permit process — Dan Hanna
Dan Hanna wanted to address the current Conditional Use Process, including how conditions are
tracked. If the conditions are on a particular property, they should be made a matter of public record by
recording Conditional Use Permits with Madison County.
Val Christensen said that a lesser amount of conditions put on properties is very welcome, as the
conditions are difficult to police. If there is not a zone that addresses what is wanted, instead of conditions the
creation of another zone would be more positive.
There was further discussion.
Chairman Dyer stated the City could look at recording Conditional Use Permits with Madison County.
He recommended that Gary Leikness present this issue of recordation of Conditional Use Permits to
the City Council. Dan Hanna also recommended that the Commission get a chance to review the
actual recording document that would be used for such a recording, so that when conditions are made,
the form fits.
3. Design Review Committee member additions -
Chairman Dyer said the Design Review Committee, a subcommittee of 6 P&Z Commissioners,
addresses building design issues. The purpose of the Design Review Committee is to give some
subjectivity and try to maintain some reason and practicality to the application of the City's Design
Standards. As two of the members are not longer on P&Z, there are currently two openings. The
11
'1
meetings are often during the day. He asked the Commissioners to review the information in the
Development Code 926 regarding this Committee. All of the P&Z Commissioners will be informed
of the openings and can let Chairman Dyer know if they are interested in serving.
4. Hidden Valley Trails Phase 1, Final Plat — requesting time extension for getting plat
recorded
Chairman Dyer recused himself due to a direct conflict of interest, and Thaine Robinson acted as
chair.
Winston DyerDyer the Dyer Group, 343 East 4'h North, Suite 108 , representing owners Valeo
Management as their engineer of record and also representing Cecil Satterthwaite, presented the
request. A preliminary plat for the entire subdivision was approved in May 2007. The Hidden Valley
Trails Phase 1 final plat was approved in September 2007. The economy has gone flat. The
developers could not move forward as they had planned but are still interested in doing so. The
City's Sub Division Ordinance states that if a preliminary plat is approved, segments may be
considered for final plat approval if they are submitted within successive intervals of 24 months. The
final plat needs to be recorded with the County within 6 months of that approval, or that approval
would become null and void, unless an extension of time is applied for and granted. Valeo
Management has submitted a letter (copies were provided to the Commission) asking the P&Z
Commission to grant an extension of time, for the final plat of phase 1. Valeo Management desires
to move forward. There would not be any change to the layout of the subdivision that has been
approved. Mr.Dyer is requesting on their behalf an extension to the end of 2010.
The Commissioners discussed the request.
Dan Hanna motioned to grant the extension request from Valeo Management for recordation of
the Hidden Valley Trails Phase 1 Final Plat until December 31, 2010. Gil Shirley seconded the
motion.
None opposed. Motion carried.
Report on Projects: None
Tabled Requests: None
Building Permit Application Report: None
Heads Up:
There will be a work meeting of the Council in regard to Development Code 926 revision adoptions.
The PEZ Zone was approved by City Council.
12
Thain Robinson suggested that the P&Z Commissioners tour the City as the City Council does,
to observe different parts of the City.
Gary Leikness will be informed of the Commission's desire to go on such a tour.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:46 pm.
13