Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutALL DOCS - 14-00081 - 202 W Main - BMC West Storage Shed - DemolitionBuilding Sofety Deporlment www.rexourg.otg Clly of Rexburg Phone: 208.372.2326 Fox: 208.359.3022 $25.00 Fee Paid: Yes/No Permit Approved: Yes/No Applicant Infotmation Site Address: Start Date: N^-., Flff\ C rppli.".,t'.Address,JO} ilJ - /Yl4'i n city/sr/zip: Rc-b, .?, -7.1 83tlLl0 Business Phone:Cell Phone: Contact Information Person or Company doing the demolition: Address:Crty/ST/Zip: Business Phone:Cell Phone: Demolition Information Property Owners Completion oate' '/Zay 2O, 2P/ t/ Summarv of what is being demolished: 4enar, ( /tmc'xA a ?o',' /fo' Cinl* A b,' - a',*A S4torknt - The U.S. Environmental Ptotection Agency @,PA) regulates the abatement and disposal of asbestos-containing materials from any public or private building involving demolition, renovation, repair, construction, and maintenance activities. http: / /deq.idaho.gov/airlprog issues/pollutants /asbestos.cfm EPA certifies and licenses asbestos-removal conftactors, inspects asbestos-abatement proiects, and enforces laws regarding the ptoper removal and disposal of asbestos-containing materials. Currently, EPA and DEQ contract vrith Industriat Hygiene Resources in Gatden City, Idaho, to regulate asbestos removal and disposal proiects in Idaho. For more information about asbestos abatement and disposal in Idaho, contact: Industrial Hygiene Resource 206 Muray St Garden City ID 83714 208-323-8287 www.industrialhvsieneresources.com I understand the EPA requirements regarding asbestos removal and agtee to provide information showing compliance with the CITY OF REXBURG America\ Family Co mmunity Application for Demolition Q+qz- lations to the City of Rexburg prior to demolition. Signatue of Applicant: Xpress Bill Pay - Transaction Details h@s:/xpressbi I lpay. com/uti ls/printerFri endly.php Print - Close /www.o Datez 0212612014 - 9:At31 N'Ilt Transaction Details XBP Confirmation Number: 25{081 bTransaction detail for paynrent to City of Rexburg. Transactlon N umber : 25032251PT Vba )00fi -)0fiX-XXXX-3735 Status:Successful Item Building Permit Deposit Building Permit Quantrty 1 1 Item Amount $100.00 $25.00 ; ExlendedAmount 5 t a0.00 s25.0A TOTAL:st2s.a0 Transaction taken by: amandaBilling Information Boyd Weatherston Boyd Weatherston ,83440 2126/2014 9:24 ANI Cireat Basin Services, Inc P. O. Box 238 BlacKoot,ID 83221 lrl-l&81 lnvoice DATE rNVOtcE# 4^0t2014 I r94 Btu-To Mountain Vallcy Constnction P.O. Box 3l I Re$urg ldaho 83440 IJ : P.O. NO.TERMS PROJECT Dueon receipt ITEM DESCRIPTION EstAmt PriorAmt Prior o/o QTY RATE Cuna/o Tolal%AMOUNT SampleJ... Asbe*os survey with written report for BMC storage shed locoted at 202 West Main, Rorburg ldaho as rcquestcd by Mike Coopcr. Asbcstos survey includes all tavel, labor for sampling shipgrng lab costqwith wdtlen report. Mccts EPA requircments for Asbestos survcy on acommercial building. 9 samples taken fiom thc building 16 total sampl€s read at the lab. 460.00 l6 30.00 100.00Plo 100.007o 480.00 All past duc acsouns will be charged 27o interest per month plus any collection costs hcuned.Total s4so.oo Great Basin Services, Inc P.O. Box 238 Blackfoot, ld8322l Phone: 208-785-1767 Fax 208-7854053 Name/Address Mounain Valley Consfiuction P.O. Box 3l I Rexburg, ldaho 83440 Estimate Date Quotef 4trcnot4 13u Payment due upon rccicpt oflnvoice llem Description Qtv Cost Total Asbcstos Remo €quipm€nt supplics Disposal and tranr.. / Renoval of built up rooling mastic, felt down to wood deck on *orage shed located at the BMC Building 202 Wcst tvlain, Rexburg ldaho All work to be done using traincd and ccrtificd Asbcstos workers using EPA ryproved removal methods. Removal ofryror 6fiD sq i of built up rooling. This is undcr a newcr rubber roofand has insulation board screwed down along wilh the rubber roof. This quote is for removal of the Asbcstos maerials only, down to wood deck If insulation board is attschbd with mastig then we will also remove this as Asbestos material, if not it can be removed c general conshrction debris by others. Equignent, manlift, fork lift to lowermaterial down to trailcr, ect Suppli,eq polln tapc, uniforms, filterq ect Transportation to an EPA approved landfill and landfill costs 6loads figurcd. If wc take ofrrubber roof add 1E00.00 dollars- Wc will leave this o be added to the rest ofthe general construction debris a 0. 6 000 I I 6 2.00 2,500.00 t,500.00 500.00 te000.$ 4500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 E*imucdby: t / {rr Total $re,ooo.q) Accecpted by: d rffaofw bc charged on all past due accounts. Any anorney fees & or costs incurred ofpast due account will be added to account balances- Pnsentedto lvfike Cooperf\dountain Valley Construction Storage shedatBMC,202 WqtMairb Rocbtttg idaho April-10-2014 Presented by: Great Basin Services, Inc Blacldoof Idaho 208-785-t767 Dave Price,I4spector Certificate # BIRI 2 I 8 13.45 Introduction On Mar-31- 2014, accredited AHERA Inspector Dave Price of Great Basin Services preformed a Comprehensive Asbestos inspection on the lumber storage building located at202 Wost main, Rexburg Idaho This inspection was requested by Mike Cooper/ Mountain Valley Constnrction. This surv€y was conducted to faciliate the firarre Demolition of this building. This building is considered to be a commercial facility and under EPA regulations, this inspection is required by EPA. Also, the count5r may need verification to grant a demolition permit, and the landfills also require that the materials they accept, need to bo tested for Asbestos. They will not accept materials from demolitions that have not been tested. They require that no Asbestos Conaining Materials ( more than I 7o Asbestos per EPA regulations) be present in any of the demo materials that they accept. Bachground The building is approximately 3545 years old. It is a storage type buildingwith one side open to access the materials that are stored in it It is a single- level structure, with no basement. There is one small section that is inctosed. The toal q ft of the building is aprox 6000 sq ft. The building has exterior concrete walls with a wood roof system. The ceilings are exposed wood and no insulation. ( insulation in small section that was heated and it is fiberglass) The roof has a newer rubber/vinyl system over older built up roofing. There are at least 2 layers of built up roofing. Also along the back parapet walls and around the small raised roo{, there is also rolled roofing. No other suspect materials were found. Sampling Dave Price, accredited AHERA inspectorcollected 9 samples of suspect Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) from the building. Those were broke down at the lab, into a total of 16 separate materials, that were tested separately. Some samples contain multiple materials that are tested individually. In this sampling scheme,'sampling locations and number of samples were selected so that they were reprcsentive of the homogeneous sampling areas with regard to the material present and it's potential asbestos content. The sampling scheme was desigrred to be comprehensive and intended to identiff ACM that might be dishrrbed during Demolition/ Renovation activities. The testing method used is a Polarized Light Microscopy ( PLM) method. This is an EPA accepted method for Asbestos testing and is the least costly. There is a different type of testing done at the lab, which is more accurate and also more expensive, called an EPA 400 Point Count Method. If a material is found to have small amounts of Asbestos ( l% - 5 Vo),the EPA 400 Point Count method can be used to reduce the actual percentages of asbestos in the original sample, down, under the lo/o regulated amounts. The type of materials containing asbestos are also is a factor in point counting. Point counting is typically used aftpr the initial PLM methods, to reduce theipercentage of asbestos in that material, to underthe EPA regulated limit of l%. ACM ,under current regulation, is defined as material with an asbestos content l7o or gneater by volume. Any sample analyzed by "polarizsd light microscopf ( PLM) method as containing l7o or morc, mtu;t be,re-anallzed * by point count method" or must be assumod, to be ACM., by EPA regulations. All samples were shipped to and analyzed by EMSL Analytical, San Leandro, California. EMSL is a AIHA accredited lab and participate in the NVLAP program. The materials werc sampled forthe purpose of identifing possible Asbestos containing materials, that would need to be removed, before Demolition of this building. This survey can be used, to satisfy EPA and OSHA regulation rcquirernents for rcnovation andlor dernolition aotivities. Conclusions and Recommendations: The following identifies the sampleNumbers, sample materials teste4 location of saurple, and approx. quantity and condition of all materials identified as conaining asbestos. Out of 16 separate materials tested atthe lab 4 samples were found to contain Asbestos in the amouts above the regulated amount of lo/o. Asbestos Containing Materials are any material that has an Asbestos content of lo/o or mor€. Any material found to be <l% asbestos is considered to be, by EPA nrle, non-asbestos materials and can be disposed of as general constuction debris. The only suspect Asbestos Containing Materials formd in the survey, were roofing materials. Asbestos containing Materials found in this surqyey anet 1. Sample # R-O2-Felt papen This material is in good condition and is a non-friable material ( means, not easily made airbome). The felt tested at 30%o Asbestos. 2. Sample # R-03 felt paper. This material is in good condition and is a non-friable materiaL This'material tested at 30o/o Asbestos. 3. Sample # R-04-roof mastic. This material is in good condition and considered to be a non-friable material. This is the black mastic(tar), and is along the small parapet wall on the West side of the building, under the rolled roofing. 4. Sample # R-O7-fettil. This is the 2nd layer of paper from the original sample r-07 This is from the raised roof area. This material is in good condition and considered to be a non-friable material This material tested at30o/o Asbestos, Aprox 6000 sq ft, multiple Wers of roofing, mistitf+fetti and'tar, also any metal flashing with mastic. '"; Even thougtr some of the samples of the built up roofing materials, and mastics testednegative for Asbestos, you cannot visually separate between the different tlpes and also different layers of roofing. Therefore you will need to assume that all the built-up roofing materials( mastic, felt, tar, rolled roofing and edge tim with mastig ec| be considered to be ACM ( Asbestos containing lvlaterials) and all are non-Friable. EPA does not require non-friable materials ( such as roofing) to be removed before demo., providing that they meet the criteria as listed on the attaclrcd sheet ( coNcERNs FoR owNERs AND DEMO coNTRAcroRs. ) Recommendations: \ile recommend that all Asbestos roofing be removed prior to demolition, by trained and Certilied Asbestos workers using EPA approved removal methods and all disposal be at an EPA approved landfilt that accepts Asbestos. This building is commercial structure and will need an EPA notitication sent in for both Asbestos and Demolition There is l0 working day waiting period before either can start The 10 14 4 t ,', i v- ., r''6*s q n ,'day are fr,onr 'poshark of the written notification. .; i, : : fgr Owpe{s and/ or DenoHtion Contractors: Roofing : Roofing materials, ghingles, built-up roofs, tar, etc., are tSpically NON- FRIABLE materials and are not required by EPA to be removed prior to Demolition, provided that it is not made to become friable by crumbling, chipping , sanding grnding, eot during demolition operations. ,If sq ttren this rnaterial must be removed prior to demo. This material falls undertheNational Emissions Standard for Hazardous AirPollutants ( NESHAP) regulations found in Appendix A to Subpart M,- Interpretive Rule Governing RoofRemoval Operations. This rule states that removal of non-Friable roofing materials involving 5580 sq ft or more are subject to NESIIAP regulations, ONLY if equipment that cntmbles, chips, or otherwise renders the roofing materials fiiable, is used. Demo conhctors and Owners need to keep in mind that during the course of tlpical demo of the entire building or house, that keeping this material from becoming friable, may be unattainable. This is why we reconrmend that all Asbestos Materials be removed prior to demo or renovation. Also, most landfills will not accept roofing materials as general cons-Euction debris, unless Asbestos testing has been done on that material, to,veri$ that the r-o0filtB ls belowthe EPA'regulated amount 6f lo/o. If roofing nateriats ai€:f_ound to contain lo/o, or mot€ Asbestos, the landfill may require to separate any A$bestos materials and may require packaging or labeling separate from General Constnrction Debris, or may not accept the material at all. Demo Contactor will need to follow all applicable rules, as pertaining to any asbestos roofing materials, that are not removed prior to demo. Floor tile: Floor tile is tlpically NON-FRIABLE and EPA therefore does not require removal prior to demo. However, the same holds true for floor tile as in roofing, if it is made to become friable by crumbling, chrpping , sanding grinding, ect during demo, then this material must be removed prior to demo. Also landfills may require that any Asbestos materials be separated from general construction debris, and orpackaged differently before disposal, or not accept the material at all. The Demo contractor will need to follo$' alt applicable rules if non-friable Asbestos floor tile or mastic are not removed prior to demo. Other non- friable materials such as, flooring mastic, roofing mastic, glues, are also treated the same as the non-friable materials listed above. : ,.,. " ;, :,i?1 , . .: iil, l:1.:1 .i.lt ii.:i i.; ,r'].irir: f.:: f{r{;tii;. ,{) tl ?:ll; -: !l'i i -:. Laboratory Results OrderlDr 09L404927 p09140492t #SlSLArbtclllrc, $tb230ZB5FfigeAw bt q4 ca 9{57 PnilrGtlO69S 3CZ5 (StSr/tttgezt k6ro!r5a6f,' Sa*ncrOror Ctnfu of Curtody ,Asbcstos Leb Servtce kophdl6odooQDtr. i .26 f AHERA {ocr& Rn7et $6pste t- Epe to.l l-EPAI"crd[ rilYstgst Gl[.U18 TEi|rqErwrcrn4r-- .h.$,.::.l-ryuoeooiatti ' r lslerDystel'lrp*r-eil i-Cf4!ds(P-lst{E fsEcQ|rsEdfi,i '}*'v!rr&' lflffidhbOond I fT&tMtA@revftnerL)l{ytttg&l nffUOE(ttrateblNYttl4t l-Et|SLSududAddHor t$O aoslMtn ; l-EPAnruocol@vc o|.irrR l-aurffrc i f ansrrcosoMcftodrua l- c-r qy'./ : Page 1 :;i ' . f nF:;. l".gl'.,. . i{ryr::i;rl.&3r- ;,:'' ''. .=- . ij :,' ,:' .f,! ;. 1 .r:, 4 '1?* lj - i. 1* "?f,rr.i0EF_' 5 r: OrderfD: A9t404927 i GhtfiEdeffY IdbScrisel ! ffi,rde|llE,s280 GEldssArr SEI&'. cf, rstt l,Eg-- R*tuJ R"t ,22of o: Pogf4l}4gzl '| ' aEreLAmlydcal,Inc 22!!Hussbo. Sutb 2!0. sar L$s.tro, CA t{At Ilrildtt l5t0) EgEilOS r{5t0D S+s380 Ett|SLOd6: Ar{0,,N?,l c|8bttsE SlEa Adane#Q; F!Fce-l|tsteffi,no s@@.ll8 Test Report Asbestos Analysb of Bulk Materlals vla EPA 600rR€3ttl6 Methotl uslng Polarlzed Llght Mlcroscopy Sonllo Daa&lbo Aalosarco lfqs&[c$e &ec qA Flhnm 9A llor.Flbnm lg tUD PlatE emlrlSl?Sl PO BuZtS Bhckhot,lD822l ,.r " / Ff ',. &cdu€4 (el786-16 0d0'ff14 l0:l5A[T AdFbUc 'lr!tl0|4 c&&d: 4t2tln4 R{t-Tsr otwu LOh|BROOF, Asd( C$$AOF 1661mn sSOtmlB{D HqrpeorEott 9006 ulllr t0l6 tlol.ft'out(o$E l l@orffi R{tfd - tguBrcoF.n,'n*,x**.-ffiffi RC.F[r 0rrtW&A R@f€[2 6.mlw LOUI'ERRq'F,U'EETEDGE AI.OIIGPARAPET 8bd( mNua nmWms Bsdr l,lqt$rqtg l.lonog€rEqrs Badr F&salg llomog3|EqJo 20S Glsss 5{r% @lul6o 1596 GlasslclimffXtF. Blsd(TVEIIEDOE Fbn|,sAT(IEPARAFET Hmogomors gOf Udtq ;iii 10S l$n 0bnr,3 (00s, 2095 M8lrt f,6 l,tonfrbms 8096 Mseb( 595 fbo{trus(oErc} p9F, EDGEo'.wa AIOI(IPARaFET R.G.Tst ala/&r$ R.sf€!l ot/r,fi/r{08| RSffz' gll*rrrr4rl rol,ERooF. Btd APFI)XCENIER Ngr.FbrroatrtfllrERROOF Hotnogor3ol3 I.OYITERROOF, Elsd(AP@(CENTER Fb1qrg()F UXUER ROOF HornogdEo,rg |SUiERROOF. thd(AFACD(CEDfIER FDmreGIOI,YERROOF Honrge6611s Sl% Mett ill',6 tlsFlDross(dlsrt 20% tlsttl Ot6 l.lc,&rqE E0t6 Mr0l,( 596 tlodDrqrs(o0rarl !hmcbd 5096 Cdldoso 15* Gbss Atwsl BoqblG.llbadayila|gg. aomoraDe|u,sd.hney Inrsr*gNoraler(tq r*rnEl'D!3rq'rEenalfct martatrutr|a6lrlcrbt![0.o' ffim.r&ct SrqbW!'N,AWtGSg|t dErre '|f,tApU0Oo.lorOrm,qWACgA{ 1erc05 T6tbs! Pt [t E'3 fthbc4r8zot4,0toixipu ,; i. i!i, , ilr, l; 'i.lit**,,',ii.,. EilSLo'|rc @1'l0l@ CrsEmr{D GBSI@ c|ah|lcFo: ftlFc0D EfiISLAnaly0cal,Inc ,2t5 tlvorosslre. && Al0, 8&r Lsn@ CA9{6t7 Phndtu l5l0lEe6{g'5rl61q8${000 !@ffi@ d@&gu&8calo Tost Rog$t Asbestos Analysls of Bulk ![ateftls vla EPA 600R€3n16 ilethod uslllg PolarEed Llgltt frllctoscopy Non{8togio8 R{iff!&$c ldVBrcS. A.SFII'ESTotwq. pAmpEf R{Snmdre otffitffi IOUERR@F. ${DAilDA€ OFROOF 8|acf Ftrqr8 lFtogol3org ' 15% Cc&dGe | 516 $nltte[c gn6 l&n'fbtqs(dlttt tO96 ilslu 1006 Non'lhrql9(o|h3rl gsd( FDtul8 ncnopnon D.r,s Prlce Gr€d Bt8ln SeMce, Inc, POBot(218 Bbcmot,lDSSidll Flurt Fe Rocshd: ArErysbOaG &il*d: @8},E r?Ut (2081 7E$.058 0{,00t410:$4il 4frt201{ 4t2l8l1 R{o-hul8ih 00t{,{&/t& IOTIERROOn Tar UNDARUEE€R p6sq1g ROOFNO HonngsrEors 8096 @khse fOfr Synltrlh 106 l.lct.CrqtB(dl|3rl lmBb6d RR{|ftlsdnodrq Qtwry IOUERrcOF etaldrat ONIi,ES|TEDGE FD613PAru|PET HdEqgleo! tOtg Glrsa l5l3 Gacotoub 0506 Msfr ffDg Non fibrql8(dGl lbsoOlbcbd RR4.frEI Rodl d;.drniwp?tl ROOF. GEsl,gsd(EIIDOF mq" Hsrqercq8 IfPRS'm| E I '1596 Ghss rgB6eosmotlb tboolbtbd €099 Ma0lr.11,::- - _. ,.; -': : l1d;r; ;iifil0B Non'6tu,l(.lh8t'i i";iii ,r'er, Ijr-.i"-ji " R{rfll arotw& UilDARUEGR 8U ROOF.CENTER FOSDOFUFFGRROOF HorryEqE l5!3 Glsss 8f6 MaUt 596 ibr'tuurtoCIsrl -fhr$bcht R{l-ls @ltl,&t0r'| RO7.FG[2 atm& L[rlDERR.tsBER Blsdi ROOF.OETITER NorrFtso$OFII'PEf ROOF llono$rEqr3 IAffiRUE&R l|t|l&,8lrdl $OF.CENTER FESEOFUPFERRdTF HonrggerEcp 9096 ildtt( ferNa|.[bmrs(dtq, €096 Me0t fG6 fbr|.[Dro5(o0Ert /|||tarbgrarrso(tO hddF ulficno{ffiUL l&r0t05 T6t Rogst PLlFT.z&g Prhffi 4n20?f 4:10O5 PM THIS IS THE I.A13T PAGE OF T}E REPORT. )i.. . *,, ,",r' i ..t i- ,f,: il ri ri. i4i:efiF!' Gf iIi'.rlr :j(i- -, -n,l '.,-,-,,; :-i;si ;,t,!,1;; !' . .-"' , *!,"- ..-r{rit irr rr, .f . ,11 Sr t: .. fl Si l,i tlL.''i ':: t,g.g,,re 'iqf",jii;li.t*, )1rl--t'!'i-" .;! ,r,. . ".1 *"aer+i1r* , ' (t, d 0)(oo o oCLIzo o oC,o'd €oU' lL\l ,l -- 7I(f nIoJ'vIoJrtTIoo) (noE 5 ryo5nTIo oo Certifications ,h-,r ir, "i ldV&. F6qk6. g'*a Llar 2(}ra EfF S=i=.i; Ff g 3 /1Ftu= \J Vr*, o o'< FrlF sls s=lgb ;rF .r ',,; tr{? Era F& 3F 4fi **'e GFs 1l y4 }{ 5 ir> * LrF7, - ;Fb * 50 F(n hHs o .?"i L F lai tr1 i; Rn Flt S> \1 "J ,ll3:r +l- Zo ';.5+ 3 cnF A;e, x g "9= {r Fz, s: ==. -ie. Ffi F-{=.' Zar -p 'fc{zr) i]]riz(fXoo(] --! :i -'J l^ lj 6'nc t-'" C 3.lV '-l et6 &=;; l(i 0 *r::tG t" t.'t-l! lrc ts lYlc.l= liilq|: le l"ilJ l--fca l- tYr ioc lxItJt- Ilg iY' l;Ir.. ll- r'- i,-rt lt..l iv i'e., -l dil\ ; 1...> l-:-i\.'l- >iEl":-',^5L-. i 0i lir."..(!tN ' t\ * *.i{'clA :t\'l -:l -l E'I :'l -vdh fi l, x?Y5i;^13- cHsFEv!3 -t O=^3 3?x7i= i.v3ln3HFHiHr* a€ 3r dJ;. ,,:f, s" ii lr: i ,.'ol *!r 'L .-;. tzr<| !=-, IPp, oo!tG}E'+TIo9l!tog ootcl. II drsr+ IIo :' t+'o Icno Imo ll {eN(tl !aNooCn ,$gs BFLt!r6Hs C'u;o !s.s- F I € 'ffi rr;i , o