The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutALL DOCS - 14-00221 - 344 W 4th S - Verizon Wireless Monopole - CUPl..ul Communications co--ifir, Washington, DC 20554 Informational Notice of Section 106 Filings Datei tot0g/2014 Reference Number: 828430 No Name Provided City of Rexburg Planning andZontngCommission 35 North lst East Rexburg, ID 83440 The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted: FILE NUMBER: 0006492960 Purpose: New Tower Submission packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 10107/2014 Applicant: Verizon Wireless Consultant: Bureau Veritas North America. Inc. Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under program Comment: NoSite Name: ID6 Ricks SiteAddress:344west4th South e@f Vut&W ir<-l'L4'r Detailed Descriffi@Er - tr/O |Z z t "- , gq 1 US.u+ Site Coordinates:43-49-06.1 N, tll-47-36.6 W fR--___ q+i^Sn +.t.t:l City: Rexburg County: MADISON State: ID Lead SHPO/THPO: Idaho State Historical preservation Office Consultant Contact Information: Name: Kate Pirot Title: Consultant PO Box: Address: 165 South Union Boulevard Suite 310 City: Lakewood State: CO Zip:80228 Phone: (303\218-3536 Fax: (303) 988-2583 Email: kate.pirot @us.bureauveritas.com NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSEUse of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic preservation Act andmay contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any personhaving access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action ;ill be taken with respect toany misuse of the system. FCC 813 April2014 Page 1 of 1 ffi ,.t Oo I)- f October 1.2014 City of Rexburg Planning and Zoning OCT 6 2014City Council Chambers 35 North 1"t East Rexburg, ldaho 83440 208.359.3020 AIII, 0F #: 10014-014266.00 EnSite #: 20837 Subject: Requested Information Regarding the Proposed IDG Ricks Communications Facility, 344 West 4'n South, Rexburg, Madison County, ldaho 83460 To Whom lt May Concern: On behalf of Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless (Verizon Wireless), Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (Bureau Veritas) is conducting a NEPA evaluation for the above-referenced property. According to the ldaho Historical Society, the City of Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission would like to be contacted regarding in Section 106 consultations within the City of Rexburg. Therefore, pursuant to 47 CFR 91.1307(a)(a), we respectfully request your comment as to whether the proposed wireless communications project'may affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places.' PROPERW DESCRIPTION Site name/location: The site is identified as the proposed Verizon Wireless lD6 Ricks Communications Facility, 344 West 4th South, Rexburg, Madison County, ldaho 83460. Proposed Action: According to construction diagrams provided by Technology Associates Engineering Corporation Inc. (TAEC) (dated August 19,2014) and client-provided information, the proposed action includes a proposed exterior 1S-foot by 2O-foot lease area, an interior 177 square-foot equipment room, and a 76-foot high monopole. The proposed action also includes installation of 12 antennas (three sectors, four antennas per sector), two Raycap OVP boxes, and 12 RRH units (three sectors, 4 RRU units per sector) on the proposed monopole. Two (2) 6-foot microwave dishes will also be installed on the monopole. An ice bridge with a GPS mounted to the support leg will run from the equipment shelter to the monopole. A 6-foot tall chain link fence with access gate is proposed to encompass the lease area. A proposed 10-foot wide utility easement will run west and southwest from the proposed lease area. A proposed 12-foot access easement will run west, connecling to an 18-foot access easement that will run south from the proposed lease area to West 4'n South. Soil disturbance is anticipated from construction of the equipment pad, monopole, and underground utilities. lri) lnliJ ll I i\Iain: (303) 9lJtt-251J5 Iiar: (303) 9ulJ-251|3 ull,.us.burcauleritrs.com llurcau Ycritas North r\mcrica, Inc. 1 1,.ilil'..\'t tr. u.l l :ttitunryLt/tl \tri,i, 165 Sruth Llnron llhd., Suitc.l1l) Laktlood. (l() 80221J City of Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission October 1.2014 Page2 Project No. 1 0014-014266.00 The following report, which was performed by SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA), is attached for your review: c Cultural Resource Evaluation and Visual Effects Analysis for the Proposed 'lDO Ricks' Cettutar Telecommunications Project, 344 West 4tn South, Rexburg, Madison County, ldaho Photographs of the site and sunounding area are included with the Cultural Resources Evaluation. We thank you in advance for your attention to this matter and respectfully request a written response to our inquiry. lf you have any questions, please call me at 303.988.2585 or e-mail me at kate.pirot@us.bureauveritas.com. Thank you very much. Sincerely, ,e#r Kate Pirot Consultant Rocky Mountain Region Attachments: Cultural Resources Evaluation S\MCA ENVIft ONMENTAL CONSUTIANTS Sound Science. Crertlw Solutiom. Derver Qffsc 295 Intarlxkan Soulcvord, Suile 300 8mmfield, Colorodo 8002 | kl 303.48/,1 183 Fox 303.487.1245 w-ryco.com October 1,2014 Ms. Kate Pirot Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. 165 South Union Boulevard, Suite 310 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 RE: Cultural Resource Evaluation and Visual Effects Analysis for the Proposed 'ID6 Ricks' Cellular Telecommunications Projecf 344 West 4th South, Rexburg, Madison County,Idaho Dear Ms. Pirot: In September 2014, SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) was contracted by Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (BVNA) to conduct cultural resource investigations for the proposed 'ID6 Ricks' cellular telecommunications tower on a paved and graveled lot at 344 West 4* South in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 30, Township (T) 6 North (N), Range (R) 40 East (E), Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho (Figure 1). The undertaking involves the construction of a 70-foot-tall monopole tower with a 6-foot-tall lightning rod (76-foot overall height), installation of a generator on a poured concrete pad, and the acquisition of access easement and utility easements. Modifications will also be made to the interior of the storage building that is directly north of the proposed tower location. The project area is at the Cenffal Storage business facility. At the request of BVNA, SWCA conducted a cultural resource inventory to provide the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with information needed for the FCC to meet federal requirements under Section 106 of the amended National Historic Preservation Act, as outlined in the FCC nationwide Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the review of effects on historic properties (FCC 04-222). The area of potential effects (APE) for direct effects as defined by the guidelines set forth in the PA consists of the area that would be directly impacted as a result of the facility construction. Specifically, the APE for direct effects is defined by a20- by l5-foot fenced enclosure that will contain the 76-foot-tall monopole and the 6-foot by 9-foot 6-inch concrete pad for the diesel generator. The APE for direct effects also includes the acquisition of a l2-foot-wide by approximately 318-foot-long access easement and a 10-foot-wide by approximately l2l-foot-long utility easement. In addition, the APE for direct effects includes a 9-foot 8-inch by l8-foot 4-inch lease area within an existing storage building; installation of a 4- by 7-foot access door in the south wall of the building; and installation of two heating, ventilation, and air conditioning condensing units on the east elevation of the building (Figure 2). Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 Page2 The PA defines the area of visual effects as 0.5 mile from the tower location fortelecommunications towers less than 200 feet in height. The proposed tower will be a maximumof 76 feet tall; therefore, the APE for visual effects extends 0.5 mile from the proposed towerlocation. This letter report summarizes the work conducted by SWCA, including pertinent results of thefile search, field investigation of the APE for direct effects and APE foi visual effects, and anevaluation of the potential impacts of the proposed project on historic properties. The freldinvestigation was conducted on September 18, 2014, by SWCA cultural ,"ro*", specialistStephanie Lechert. FiIe Search SWCA conducted a file search through the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office (SHpO) onSeptember n,2Al4 (SHPO record search number 14377). The file search involved a location-based query to identiff previously conducted cultural resource investigations and previously recorded cultural resources, such as standing buildings and structur"r, hirtori, districts, aniarchaeological sites, within 0.5 mile of the project parcel. According to the Idaho SHpO filesearch results, nine cultural resource projects were previously conducted within 0.5 mile of thecurrent project area. These cultural resource projects are primarily roadway impact evaluationsconducted for the Idaho Deparknent of Transportation, plus one projlct ior Idaho StateUniversity and one for Western States Development Corporation. Sir of the previous projectareas fall within the same Section, Township, and Range as the current undertaking: however.most of these projects were associated with transportation development along Eastl"d Avenueand University Boulevard and none appear to have included direct inspection of the proposedproject area. Previously recorded cultural resources within 0.5 mile of the project area include five historic-age buildings, two agricultural waterways, one railroad, and one road (Table l). One of theirrigation structures (65-15937), the railroad (65-15924), the road (65-15915), and one of thebuildings (65-15903) have been determined eligible for listing in the National Register ofHistoric Places [NRHP). The remaining five cultural resources were determined not etigiUte forlisting in the NRHP or have not been fully evaluated. None of the previously recorded sites arewithin the APE for direct effects; however, all of these resources are within 0.5 mile of theproject area, within the APE for visual effects. Site Numberl Property Name Property Type NRIIP Status Distance to Tower (rniles) 65-rs912 Rexburg Armory Buildins Not Elisible 0.43 10MO73 South Branch Rexbure Canal CanaVStructure Unevaluated 0.11 65-15937 Rexburg Canal CanaVStructure Elieible 0.13 r0il'Io74t 6s-15915 U.S. l9l Highway, Old Yellowstone Highway Highway/Structure Eligible 0.05 r0Mo75/ 65-t5924 Eastern Idaho Railroad Grade- Union Pacific Railroad Railroad/Structure Eligible 0.17 6s- I 5903 Stewart House Buildins Elieible 0.19 65-15906 165 S. l" W. House Buildine Not Elieible 0.45 65-r5907 2525.5-W. House Buildins Not Elieible 0.28 65-15910 Vireinia S. Collier House Buildine Not Elieible 0.21 Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 Page 3 Table L. Previously Recorded Resources within 0.50 Mile of the Project Location. t Site Number : Idaho Historical Society Number, Smithsonian Number, and/or National Register Reference Number NRHP : National Register of Historic Places In addition to the cultural resource file search, SWCA conducted a review of publically available historic records to determine the land use history of the subject property and to assess the potential for historic archaeological sites or architectural resources within the proposed APE not yet identified through cultural resource investigation. SWCA reviewed U.S. General Land Office (GLO) records retained by the Bureau of Land Management. The 1880 plat map from the GLO for T6N, R40E depicted an unnamed northeast/southwest-trending road bisecting Section 30. The road largely paralleled the South Fork of the Teton River. The first documented historic use of this property occurred in 1895, when the location was included within an 8O-acre homestead patent granted to Frederick L. Klingler.t In the early twentieth century, the road from Idaho Falls and heading north into Montana was designated as a portion of the Yellowstone Highway, connecting Utah and Idaho with Yellowstone National Park. The route, which originally followed a series of local roads, was realigned in the 1920s to follow Union Pacific Railroad and was designated State Highway 191. The former Yellowstone Highway alignment, and State Highway 191 crosses immedtiately south of the project area along present day 4* Street. A 1940 Metsker Map of Madison County, Idaho, T6N, R40E, indicates that the subject parcel at at344 West 4tr South had been subdivided into multiple lots. The area is noted as the South End Addition. The 1950 U.S. Geological Survey topographic map does not depict any buildings at the proposed project location. Aerial imagery indicates that the Central Storage business facility has been present since at least 1992. According to their website, Central Storage (which has three locations in Rexburg) has been in business for more than2} years. The surrounding area consists of residential and commercial properties. t Bur"uuoflandManagement.2014.OfficialWebsiteoftheU.S.Departmentofthelnterior,Bureauofland Management General Land Offrce Records. Access Number ID0140.307. Online database available at http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/default.aspx. Accessed September 2014. Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 Page 4 Evaluation of the APE for Direct Effects The proposed project includes ground-disturbing activities in areas that have not been previously inventoried for cultural resources. However, the substantial level of previous disturbance in the form of grading and paving of the project area for construction of the storage facility has eliminated the potential for any resources of historic significance on the property. SWCA cultural resource specialist Stephanie Lechert visited the project area on September 18,2014, to confirm the level of previous and recent disturbance. The field visit confrmed that the APE has been previously graded and partly covered with asphalt and gravel, and that no potential exists for significant archaeological resources within the APE for direct effects. Based on the previous disturbance at the project location, it is unlikely that any significant cultural resources will be disturbed by the proposed project. It is SWCA's professional opinion that No Historic Properties are Present within the APE for direct effects. Evaluation of the APE for Visual Effects On September 18, 2014, SWCA cultural resource specialist Stephanie Lechert conducted a viewshed analysis of the APE for visual effects to assess if the proposed project would result in any adverse effects on historic properties beyond the direct project area. Historic properties are cultural resources that are either listed in, or eligible for listing in the NRHP. The critical viewshed is the intended historic view of a historic property that captures the character-defining integrity of the property, as critically enhanced by setting and feeling. The critical viewshed also includes the intended view from the historic properfy where any character-defining integrity is critically enhanced by the historic setting and feeling of the properfy. Thus, in order for the telecommunications tower to have an effect on historic properties within the APE for visual effects, it must be visible within the viewshed when looking at a historic properfy or within the intended viewshed looking from the property and the viewshed must be critical to the historic integrity (i.e., setting and feeling) of the property. The APE for visual effects includes the area within which effects from constructing the telecommunications tower could impact historic properties, in this case, through visual intrusion. The SHPO record search identified four historic properties within the O.S-mile APE for visual effects (Figure 3; see Table 1). Representative views toward the proposed project area were photographed from these properties, as illustrated in Photographs 11 through24 in Appendix A. The proposed tower will not be visible from three of the historic properties within the APE for visual effects. Views from the Rexburg Canal (65-15937), the Eastern Idaho Railroad,/Union Pacific Railroad Grade (10MO75/65-15924), and the Stewart House (65-15903) are intemrpted by urban development and mature vegetation within the Rexburg area obstructing all views of the proposed tower location. As a result there will be no effect on these resources. The proposed tower will be visible from a small segment of U.S. 191 HighwayiOld Yellowstone Highway (65-15915) (Photograph l1). The former road and highway crosses immediately south of the project area along West 4* Street South. However, in this area extensive suburban development has resulted in a setting that contains modern buildings and infrastructure including transmission poles and other towers that are similar in form to the proposed undertaking. Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 Page 5 Therefore, the proposed tower will not result in any substantial changes to the existing settingand the proposed tower will have No Adverse Effect on Historic Propeiies within 0.5 mile of theproject area. SWCA therefore recommends that the proposed installation will result in No Adverse Effect onHistoric Properties within the ApE for visual effects. Summary and Conclusions In summary, it is ourprofessional opinion that No Historic Properties are present within the ApEfor direct effects and_that the undertaking will result in No Adverse Effect on Historic properties within the APE for visual effects. Therefore, SWCA recommends a finding of No Adverse Effecton Historic Properties for the proposed undertaking. Please feel free to contact us if you needadditional information or would like SWCA to conduct any additional services on vour behalf. Sincerely,reMichael J. Retter Principal Investigator James W. Steely Historian/Architectural Historian Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 Page 6 Figure 1. Location of the proposed project and the APE for visual effects. Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 PageT Figure 2. Overview of the APE for direct effects. Ms. Kate Pirot October 1,2014 Page 8 Figure 3. Photo point locations used to document the APE for visual effects. Photo l View towards the proposed cell tower location, facing north. Photo 3 View towards the proposed cell tower location, facing south. Photo 5 View from the proposed cell tower location, facing south. Photo 2 View towards the proposed cell tower location, facing east. Photo 4 View towards the proposed cell tower location from S. 3'd W, facing west. Photo 6 View from the proposed cell tower location, facing west. Photo 7 View from the proposed cell tower location, facing northwest. Photo 8 View from the proposed cell tower location, facing southeast. Photo 9 View down the utility easement, facing south towards W. 4th S. Photo 10 View of the interior of the storage unit where equipment will be stored, facing north. Photo 11 View from 65-15915 (in foreground), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing north. Photo 12 View from 65-15915 (in foreground), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southwest. Photo 13 View from 55-15915 (in foreground), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southwest. Photo 15 View from 65-15924 (in foreground) and 65- 15915 (in background), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing east. Photo 14 View from 65-15915 (in foreground), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing west. Photo 16 View from 65-15924 (in mid ground) and 55- 15915 (in background), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing northeast. Photo 17 View from 65-t5924 (in mid ground), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southwest. Photo 18 View from 55-15924 and 65-15937, facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southeast. Photo 19 View from 65-t5924 and 55-15937, facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southeast. Photo 21 View from 65-15937, facing toward the proposed tower location, facing east. Photo 20 View from 65-15937 (on right-hand side), facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southeast. Photo 22 View of 65-15937, facing north. Photo 23 View of 65-15903, facing east.Photo 24 View from 65-15903, facing toward the proposed tower location, facing southwest. A. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SLIRVEY REPORT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SIJRVEY OF IDAHO IDAHO STATE HISTORIC PRESEVATION OFFICE All surveys completed for review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act must include textual or checked responses to each element below. A failure to include all elements and required attachments will result in a rejection ofthe report for review purposes until the missing dataare supplied. Surveys not 106-related must include all elements except those specified for 106. KEYINFORMATION 1. Project name: Cultural Resource Evaluation and Visual Effects Analysis for the Proposed 'ID6 Ricks' Cellular Telecommunications Project, 344 West 4ft South, Rexburg, Madison Count5r, Idaho 2. Report number or associated federal project number (if appropriate): N/A 3. Agency name (if 106-related): Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 4. Report author (and principal investigator if different): Nicole Kromarek, Jim Steely (architectural PI), and Michael Retter (archeological PI) 5. Date: October 1,2014 6. County: Madison 7. Township, range, section (each township and associated sections listed separately): Township 6 North, Range 40 East Section 30 8. Acres Surveyed: _ intensive (30-meter or less transect interval) 9-n4 reconnaissance (greater than 30-meter transect interval, intuitive, or statistical sample) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (for 1 06-related surveys) 1. Description of project and potential direct and indirect impacts to known or suspected historic properties: The undertaking involves the construction of a 70-foot-tall monopole with a 6-foot-tall lightning rod (76-foot overall height), placement of a pre-fabricated equipment shelter, acquisition of an access easement, and establishment of a utility easement. Modifications will also be made to the interior of the storage building that is directly north of the proposed tower location. Direct impacts from construction could include ground disturbance resulting from construction, or visual impacts resulting from the monopole altering the viewsheds of historic properties. 2. Description of Area of Potential Effects (APE) with reference to attached map: B. 4. The area of potential effects (APE) for direct effects as defined by the guidelines set forth in the PA consists of the area that would be directly impacted as a result of the facility construction. Specifically, the APE for direct effects is defined by a20- by lS-foot fenced enclosure that will contain the 76-foot-tall monopole and the 6-foot by 9-foot 6- inch concrete pad for the diesel generator. The APE for direct effects also includes the acquisition of a l2-foot-wide by approximately 318-footJong access easement and establishment of a l0-foot-wide by approximately l2l-foot-long utility easement. In addition, the APE for direct effects includes a 9-foot 8-inch by l8-foot 4-inch lease area within the storage building; installation of a 4- by 7-foot access door in the south wall of the building; and installation of two heating, ventilation, and air conditioning condensing units on the east elevation of the building. The PA defines the area of visual effects as 0.5 mile from the tower location for telecommunications towers less than 200 feet in height. The proposed tower will be a maximum of 76 feet tall; therefore, the APE for visual effects extends 0.5 mile from the proposed tower location. Project acres: 0.124 acre Owner(s) of land in project area: (Key to map.) Private land holder STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES FOR SURVEY (Describe area to be investigated. Note the amount and kinds of archival and freld information to be gathered with reference to historic contexts and property types that are expected. Be specific.) The objectives for the survey were to identifu, document, and evaluate cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed undertaking. The project area is at the Central Storage business facility. Because the APE is heavily disturbed, aerial imagery and U.S. General Land Office (GLO) maps will be consulted in an effort to trace the history of this parcel and its development. Due to the disturbed nature of the parcel, no cultural resources, are expected to be present in the APE. LOCATION AND GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING l. USGS topographic map(s): Rexburg, ID (1979) 2. Setting: (Describe landforms, topography, elevation, water, flora, faun4 mineral resources, etc. as they relate to human use.) The project area is located in the southwest portion of Rexburg, in an area mostly surrounded by urban development. The current environment, situated in a partly paved lot, is not reflective of natural and/or historic conditions. Vegetation in the vicinity is introduced and maintained. Many species of animals documented to have utilized the area prior to development likely no longer do so. No soils are present C. D. on the surface ofthe projeatatea- Any soils present are locatedbeneath the pavement andhave likely been disturbed by urban development activities. Although resources used by prehistoric peoples were once located in the project area, sites of any kind are not expected to be preserved due to extreme disturbance in the APE. The APE is a disturbed commercial property that no longer contains the flora and fauna it would have prehistorically. E. PRE-FIELD RESEARCH SHPO Record Search Number (provided by SHPO at the time of record search): 1. Sources ofinformation checked: r4377 [ ] Overviews [ ] National Register [X] Archaeological site records/maps [X] Architectural site records/maps [X] Survey records [ ] Ethnographic studies [X] Historical records/maps (list) GLO Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Topo Maps, Metsker Maps [ ] Individuals/groups with special knowledge (list) [ ] Other (list) 2. Summary ofprevious studies in the general area: (Include titles, authors, year, report numbers, and study results. Relate to contextual themes where appropriate.) [ ] None 3. Description and evaluation of projects in 8.2 with regard to survey design, methods, personnel, and results: Five historic buildings, two historic canals, a historic road, and a historic railroad have been recorded in the areabyprevious surveys ' Table l. Previous Studies Within 0.50 MiIe of the APE Report No.Report Title Author(s)Year Apencv 1989/1992 Annual Report of Archaeolosical Investi gations Gaston, Jenna 1982 Idaho Transportation Dept. 1989/2062 ARR, Rexburg 2"o East Street Gaston, Jenna r986 Idaho Transportation Deot. 1989/2064 ARR, Rexburg 2"u East Gaston. Jenna 1986 Idaho Transportation Dept. 1996/719 South Rexburg Arterial Gaston, Jenna t996 Idaho Transportation Deot. 2004/402 South Rexburg Arterial Project. Northwind, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID. Harding, W.2003 Idaho Transportation Dept. 2007/s78 South Rexburg Arterial, Sunrise Drive Extension. Crockett. Victor. ID. Crockett, S.200'7 Idaho Transportation Department 2010/258 Kennedy Elementary School SR2S. Rexbure Peeso, E.2010 Idaho Transportation Deoartment 1989/983 Letter Report to Robert Baker, Western States Dev. Corp. regarding projects in Shelley and Rexburg, May 19,1976. Idaho State Universitv Butler. B. Robert 1976 Western States Dev. Cotp. r994/r1 Homestead Apartment- Farmer's Home Administration. Idaho State Universitv. Sammons, Dotty 1993 Idaho State University F. Previous surveys within 0.5 mile of the APE generally resulted in the location of few archaeological cultural resources. This is likely due to the significant amount of development that has taken place in the general area. Sites in the area include a historic building and a historic roadway. Six of the previous project areas fall within the same Section, Township, and Range as the current undertaking; however, it is unlikely that the current project area intersects any ofthese surveys. E)(PECTED HISTORIC AND PREHISTORIC LAND USE AND SITE SENSITTVITY 1. Are cultural properties known in this area? [ ] No [X] Yes (List site numbers and provide brief description of cultural theme represented by known cultural properties. Key to map.) Table 2. Sites Within 0.5 Mile of the APE t Site Number: Idaho Historical Society Number, Smithsonian Number, and/or National Register Reference Number NRHP : National Register of Historic Places Themes represented by the known culfural properties within 0.5 mile of the APE include settlement and agriculture. None of these resources are located within the APE for direct effects for the current project. 2. Are cultural properties expected? [] Yes [X] No (Why?) Aerial photography of the direct effects APE indicates that the proposed tower location is in a paved lot used as a self-storage facility. 3. What cultural themes/contexts are expected within the survey area? Check at least one theme in first two columns and at least one time period in the third column. Theme [ ] Prehistoric Archaeology [] Agriculture [ ] Architecture [ ] Civilian Conserv. Corp. [] Commerce [ ] Communication [ ] Culture and Society Time Period [ ]Military [ ] Mining Industry [ ] Native Americans [ ] Politics/Govemment [ ] Public Land Mngl/Conserv. [ ] Recreation/Tourism [X] Settlement Prehistoric Historic Native American Exploration: 1805-1860 Settlement: 1855-1890 Phase I Statehood: 1890-1904 Phase II Statehood: 1904-1920 [X] Interwar: 1920-1940 ttttt tl Site Numberr Property Name Property Type NRIIP Status Distance to Tower (miles) 65-r5912 Rexburg Armory Buildine Not Elisible 0.43 t0Mo73 South Branch Rexburs Canal CanaVStructure Unevaluated 0.1I 6s-ts937 Rexburg Canal Canal/Structure Elieible 0.13 t0}v4o74l 65-15915 U.S. 191 Highway, Old Yellowstone Hishwav Highway/Structure Eligible 0.05 10MO75/ 65-t5924 Eastern Idaho Ra Union Pacific Ra lroad Grade- lroad Railroad,/Structure Eligible 0.r7 65-15903 Stewart House Buildine Elisible 0.19 65-15906 165 S. l't W. House Buildine Not E eible 0.45 65-15907 2525.5"'W. House Buildins Not El eible 0.28 65-15910 Vireinia S. Collier House Buildine Not E sible 0.21 [ ] Ethnic Heritage [ ] Timber Industry [ ] Exploration/Fur Trapping [X] Tranqportarion [] Industry [ ] Other (list) 4' Brief description of where cultural properties associated with expected themes might be found withrespect to landforms, water, vegetation, slope, fauna, and historical documentation: No cultural (archeological) properties are expected because the proposed tower location is within apaved area with storage buildings. In addition to the cultural resource file search, SWCA conducted a review of publically availablehistoric records to determine the land use history of the subject properly and toassess the potentialfor historic archaeological sites or architectural resources within the proposed ApE not yet identifiedthrough cultural resource investigation. S![/CA reviewed U.S. General Land Office (drO) recordsretained by the Bureau of Land Management. The 1880 plat map from the GLO for tOiit, R+OEdepicted an unnamed northeast/southwest-trending road bisecting Section 30. The road largelyparalleled the South Fork of the Teton River. The frrst documented historic use of this properryoccurred in 1895, when the location was included within an 8O-acre homestead patent granted toFrederick L' Klingler. A 1940 Metsker Map of Madison County, Idaho, T6N, R40E, indi"cates thatthe subject parcel of land had been subdivided into multiple lots. The area is noted as the South EndAddition. The 1950 U.S. Geological Survey topographic map does not depict any buildings at theproposed project location. Aerial imagery indicates that the Cental Storage business facility ias beenpresent since at least 1992- According to their website, Central Storage (which has three locations inRexburg) has been in business for more than 20 years. The rorroondirrg area consists of residentialand commercial properties. [X] Pre-Modem: 1940-1958 [X] Modern: 1 958-present G. FIELDMETHODS @e specific and complete.) l ' Areas examined and type of coverage: @escribe actual methods used including transect interval andtransect routes.as shown on attached map. Justiff any non-intensive survey.) SWCA cultural resource specialist Stephanie Lechert conducted intuitive reconnaissance survey ofthe APE for direct effects on September 18,2014. The survey included the inspection and the area forground disturbance and assessing the potential for archaeological materials within the 0.124-acreAPE for direct effects_ 2' Description ofground surface conditions: (Describe surface and subsurface visibility and factors such asvegetation or snow obscuring visibility. Speciff percentage ofsurface that was visible.i Visibility in the APE was 0 percent. The current APE for direct effects is located within a paved area. 4. Areas not examined and reasons why: (Key to map.) 5. Names of personnel participating in the survey in the field: Jamie clark 6. Datesof survey: September lB,Z0l4 7. Problems encountered: [X] None RESULTSH. 1. Listing of all cultural properties (including previously recorded) in this area: @ully describe each on attached site forms and indicate precise location on attached USGS map.) [ ] None No cultural resources are located in the APE for direct effects. Four previously recorded NRHP- eligible resource, one unevaluated resource, and four not eligible resources are present within the 0.5- mile APE for visual effects (Table 3, Figure 3). Table 3. Cultural Resources Located in the APE for Visual Effects Field No.Site No.Tvpe of Propertv ArtifactdFeutures 65-t59t2 65 - | 59 | 2 Rexburs Armory Buildins N/A r0Mo73 l0MO73 South Branch Rexburg Canal Structure N/A 65-15937 65-15937 Rexburs Canal Structure N/A r0Mo74/6 5-15915 t0Mo7 4t65-15915 U.S. 191 Highway, Old Yellowstone Hiehwav Structure N/A l0Mo75/6 5-t5924 LODMO7 5 / 65 - I 5924 Eastern Idaho Railroad Grade - Union Pacific Railroad Structure N/A 65-15903 65-15903 Stewart House Buldine N/A 65-15906 65-15906 165 S. lst W. House Buldine N/A 65-15907 65-15907 252 5.5- W. House Buldine N/A 65-15910Virsinia S. Collier House Buildine N/A On September 18,2014, SWCA cultural resource specialist Stephanie Lechert conducted aviewshed analysis of the APE for visual effects to assess if the proposed project would result in any adverse effects on historic properties beyond the direct project area. Historic properties are cultural resources that are either listed in, or eligible for listing in the NRHP. The critical viewshed is the intended historic view ofa historic property that captures the character-defining integrity ofthe property, as critically enhanced by setting and feeling. The critical viewshed also includes the intendedviewfrom the historic Foperty where any character-defining integrity is critically enhanced by the historic setting and feeling of the properby. Thus, in order for the telecommunications tower to have an effect on historic properties within the APE for visual effects, it must be visible within the viewshed when looking at a historic property or within the intended viewshed looking from the property and the viewshed must be critical to the historic integrity (i.e., setting and feeling) of the property. The APE for visual effects includes the area within which effects from constructing the telecommunications tower could impact historic properties, in this case, through visual intrusion. The SHPO record search identified four historic properties within the 0.5-mile APE for visual effects (Figure 3; see Table l). Representative views toward the proposed project area were photographed from these properties, as illustrated in Photographs 11 through 24 in Appendix A. The proposed tower will only be visible from a small segment of U. S. I 9 I Highway/Old Yellowstone Highway (65-15915) (Photograph 11). However, in this area extensive suburban development has resulted in a setting that contains modern buildings and infrastructure including transmission poles and other towers that are similar in form to the proposed undertaking. Therefore, the proposed tower will not result in any substantial changes to the existing setting and the proposed tower will have No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties within 0.5 mile of the project area. SWCA therefore recommends that the proposed installation will result in No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties within the APE for visual effects. 2. Summary of important characteristics of properties listed above: (Consider property type, integrity, age, cultural affinity ofoccupants, function, depth, and size.) Small-town, low-scale residential and commercial buildings on single lots, in a formerly agricultural area served by early irrigation canals and drains. 3. Recommendations for National Register eligibility of each cultural property: (Specify both appropriate National Register criteria and contexts listed in F. JustiS on attached site forms.) Site No. Eligibility Criteria Context All four of the historic properties within the APE for visual effects have been determined elieible for listing in the NRHP (see Table 2). 4. Recommendations for further investigations needed to evaluate cultural properties: No further investigations are needed or recommended. 5. Cultural properties noted but not formally recorded: (Key to map.) [X] None Field No. Description Reason not Recorded CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Brief summary of relevance of cultural properties to contexts listed under F, discussing potential contributions to these contexts: No properties were newly recorded during this survey. Visual impacts were assessed to previously recorded properties if they had been previously found eligible for listing in the NRHP. Evaluating these resources and their potential contributions to contexts listed under F was completed during their initial recording and evaluation. 2. Discussion of potential threats to the integrity of the cultural properties and recommendations for fi.rture investigations or protective actions: No historic properties are present in the APE for direct effects. This project proposes no adverse effects to the integrity of the historic properties in the APE for visual effects. 3 . For 1 06-related suryeys, discussion of relationship of each cultural property to direct and indirect proj ect impacts. Specifically state project's effect (no effect, no adverse effect, or adverse effect) upon each culturalproperty: []Noproperties Table 5. Project Impacts Sile No.NREP Elipibilin APE Effect 65-15915 U.S. 191 Highway/Old Yellowstone Hiehwav Eligible Visual No Adverse Effect 65-15937 Rexburs Canal Elisible Visual No Effect 65-15924 Eastern Idaho Railroad Grade - Union Pacific Railroad Eligible Visual No Effect J. Table 5. Proiect Imnacts Site No.NRHPEIUbiIitv APE Effect 65-15903 Stewart House Elisible Visual No Effect In summary, it is our professional opinion that No Historic Properties are Present within the APE for direct effects and that the undertaking will result in No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties within the APE for visual effects. Therefore, SWCA recommends a finding of No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties for the proposed undertaking. Please feel free to contact us if you need additional information or would like SWCA to conduct any additional services on your behalf. 4. For I 06-related surveys affecting cultural properties, discussion of avoidance or mitigation options for each property: No avoidance measures are required. 5. For 106-related surveys, recommendations for additional information gathering or survey, avoidance measures, monitoring, mitigation, and future management: [X] None ATTACHMENTS (The following is only a checklist. All survey reports must include maps of the survey area showing survey transects, precise locations ofall cultural properties, and, if 106-related, area ofpotential effects. All survey reports must include attached completed site forms UMACS or equivalent forms for archaeological sites and architectural forms for structures and buildings] for each cultural property.) l. 2. 3. Appropriate forms attached for each site? Maps attached? Other attachments? (List) [ ]Yes [X]Yes [X]Yes K. Viewshed analysis photographs REPOSITORY (Copies of all survey reports and site forms are located at the Idaho SIIPO office. List where original survey records and attendant data will be located.) SWCA office in Broomfield, Colorado. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS I certify that this investigation was conducted and documented according to Secretary oflnterior's Standards and guidelines and that the report is complete and accurate to the best ofmy knowledge. L. //// 7, i^;t'*l'r0/r/2014 M. REFERENCES CITED Bureau of Land Management. 2014. Official Website of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management General Land Office Records. Access Number ID0140.307. Online database available at http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/default.aspx. Accessed September 20 I 4. Figure 1. Location of the proposed project and the ApE for visual effects. Figure 2. APE for direct effects. For Ofrciel Use : Disctosuro ofs,te locations Legend + ProposedTowerLocation I Photo Point S Historic Property -"*"- Historic Linear Slructure *ll:l APE br Direct Efiects APE br Visual Efiects (0.5 mile) fl Townstrip / Range Boundary Mi16 0 0"25 0.5 1:12.000 Base Map' \ ,brld_lmagery, Esri Online SeNice Source: Esri, Digitalclobe, GeoEy€. Lcubed, USDA, USGS, AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, lGN, lGP, swisstopo. and the GIS U6er Community Township 6N Range 39E, T6N R40E Quadrangle: Rexburg, lD (1979) Madison County, lD t,|AD 1983 UTM Zone 12N s22m14 0.25 SWCA l}MrcNrlXUL COrSUttAXll 295 lnterlooken Btvd.Suib 3mEromfeld, CO 8002'l Phore: 303,487,1183 Fax: 303.487.1245 N A Figure 3. Photo point locations used to document the APE for visual effects. clr:'l ' i{"j1x$uitG {1-&,: ,',.i:i etie;.i !:il *i!;' t-); 17; a i1 i;1 ii:' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City of Rexburg Department of Gommunity Development 35 North 1st East, Rexburg, lD 83440 Phone: (208)359-3020 Permit #: 14-00221 Proiect Name: Verizon Wireless Monopole W.4th S. - CUP Site Address: 344 West 4th South Purpose Conditional Use Permit for a Verizon Wireless 7O-foot monopole. Conditions 1. The setbacks shall be relaxed so that the tower can be placed as specifled. (Chapter 1 1, Section 7.b.iv of the City of Rexburg Development Code requires that towers be setback "a distance equal to at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the height of the tower from any adjoining line." Table 1 of the said section requires the cell tower to be constructed a distance of 200 feet of 300% of the height of tower whichever is greater from single family or duplex residential units and 100 feet or 100% of the height of the tower whichever is greater from multi-family residential. Setback requirements may be reduced by the P&Z Commission). The Standard CUP requirements stated in Development Code Ordinance No.1 115 (Standards Applicable to Conditional Use Permits Section 6.128) apply to the Conditional Use Permit. Print Name Signature Date fssued: 7 l'lBl2O14 lssued By: elainem "m n Vafr j' i.- cilr ()i i{EXJJUITG(\'.-.--"---- ,!tu! r i[ i't i :an; ly Co D1 tilt! nil y From City of Rexburg Development Code Ordinance No. 1,11'5, 1,. Constitute a conditional use as established in Table 1, Zontng Districts, and Table 2, Land Use Schedule. 2. Be in accordance with a specific or general objective of the City's Comprehensive Plan and t}re regulations of this Ordinance. 3. Be designed and constructed in a manner to be harmonious with the existing character of the neighborhood and the zone in rvhich the property is located. 4. Not create a nuisance or safety hazard fot neighboring ptoperties in terms of excessive noise or vibration, improperly directed glare or heat, electrical interference, odors, dust or air pollutants, solid waste generation and storage, hazardous materials orwaste, excessive traffic generation, or interference with pedestrian iu:af{rc. 5. Be adequately sewed by essential public facilities and sewices such as access stteets, police and fue protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, watet and sewer sewice, and schools. If existing facilities are not adequate, the developer shall show that such facilities shall be upgraded sufficiently to serve the proposed use. 7. Not generate traffic in excess of the capacity of public streets or access points sewing the proposed use and urill assure adequate visibility at taffrc access points. Be effectively buffered to screen adjoining propeties from adverse impacts of noise, building size and resulting shadow, traffic, and parking. 8. Be compatible with the slope of the site and the capacity of the soils and will not be in an area of naturalhazards unless suitably designed to protect lives and property. 9. Not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a histotic feature of significance to the communiry of Rexburg. 6. 6.128. - Standards Applicable to Conditional Use Permits. The approving body shall adequate evidence to shorv that the proPosed use will: Ciry of Rexburg 35 North 1" East Rexburg, ID 83'140 Phone: 208.359.3020 Fas: 208 "359.3022 or liF4nusG A ttu: ri.(t\ I:!t !11 i ly l:oli ni I r il it.y }uly 18,2014 YerjLzon Wireless Attention: Jared White 1894 West 1690 South Voodsctoss,UT 84067 Re: #14 00221 Condttional Use Permit - Verizon Wireless Monopole - 344 West 4s South, Rexburg, Idaho Dear Mr. \Vhite: Enclosed is the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) document for the property located at344 West 4th South for aYeizonWireless 70'monopole. The CUP includes one stated condition, per the Conditional Use Permit's approval at the July 16,201'4 Rexbutg City Council meetmg' Please keep this document for your records- Section 6.12 B-Standards Applicable to Conditional Use Permits, from Development Code Ordinance No. 11 1 5, applies to the Conditional Use Permit. It is included fot your reference. Please call if you have any questions or if rve can assist you further' Thank you. Sincerelv. /\ A^ ,a Yea*",-urlwi'?fur-. Elaine McFerrin Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of Rexbutg Phnning e! Zoning Ciy oJfuxbaq 35 Nzrth l't Edsl. Rcxbary ID 83110 Phone: 208. 3 5 9. 3020 Fa-x: 208. 3 5 9. J02 2 Findings of Focl City of Rexburg Phone: 208.359.3020 Fax: 208.359.3022 Conditional Use Permit # 1,4 00221 Verizon Wireless Monopole 344 West 4'h South 1. On May 23,2074,Verizon Wireless representativeJared White presented by mail to the City of Rexbug Planning & Zonng Coordinator a request and application for a Conditional Use. Permit for a70'monopole. The ptoperty is located at344 West 4'n South 2. On May 27,2014, the City Clerk sent the Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the local newspaper on May 31, andJune 74,201.4. A notice was posted on the proPerty and sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the above mentioned property. 3. OnJune 79,2074,Jared \ff{hite, representingYeizon Wireless, presented to the Planning & . ZoninE Commission for the City of Rexburg, the request for a Conditional Use Permit fot a 70'monopole zt344 ril7est 4'n South. Steve Oakey motioned to recommend to the City Council apptoval of a Conditional Use Petmit fferizon Wireless) for a70'monopole to be located at344 West 4'n South, as stated, with no conditions. Gil Shirley seconded the motion. Bruce Suthetland said the east property lir. setback is out of compliance. The setback requirement would need to be relaxed. Steve Oakey restated his motion (rddiog a condition), to recommend to the City Council apptoval of a Conditional Use Permit (Verizon Wireless) for a 7 0' monopole to be locate d at 344 \West 4' South, and to include one condition: 1. The setbacks shall be relaxed so that the tower can be placed as specified. Gil Shirley seconded the testated motion. (Chapter 11, Section 7.b.iv of the City of Rexburg Development Code tequires that towets be setback "a distance equal to at least seventy five percent Q 5"/o) of the height of the tower from any adioining lot line". Furthermore Table 1 of the said section requires the cell tower to be constructed a distance of 200 feet or 300o/o of the height of tower whichever is greater from single family or duplex residential units and 100 feet ot 700o/o of the height of the tower whichever is greater from multi-family residential. Setback requitements may be reduced by the P&Z Commission.) The Standard CUP requirements stated in the Development Code No.1026 ("Standards Applicable to Conditional Use Permits" Section 6.128) apply to the Conditional Use Permit. None opposed. Motion carried. ClTY OF KEXBURG clbJ -----"---" A*t *ica's Fs milv (ttm $ tffii t I35 Norlh l.t Eosi Rexburg, lD 83440 www.rexourg.org 4. On July 76,201.4 at City Council, Jared White, 1894 West 1690 South, Woodscoss, lJT, tepresenting Verizon STireless reviewed the proposal to install a new 70 foot cell tower pole. The locatiofl was reviewed on the overhead screen; the equipment will be housed in an adjoining storage unit. Staff Reoot: Staff recommends that the Commission take public testimony, and determine if thete is need for setback requirements of 75o/o of tower height from adjoining lot lines, need to be co-locatable for 3 usets, and if there is a need for any buffedng, landscaping or other requirements as per the analysis section above. The Madison County Fire Department, Public \Works Directot and the City Engineer did not have any concems with this proposal. Community Development Directot Christensen reviewed the proposal which is not aheavy commercial project. He reviewed Chapter 11 of the Development Code conceming Cell Towers. There are set back options with a Conditional Use Permit. He reviewed the Planning and Zonngconditions to the proposal. Council Member Busby reviewed the proposal. Mr. White teptesenting Vetizon Wireless explained Federal Law requires cities to allow cell towers within their cities. He said this location does allow for a cell tower. Higher Yertzon wireless usage than expected requires an additional cell tower in this atea to provide really good coverage. Council President Smith moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for aYenzon \X/iteless 70 foot Monopole at344 \West 4th South with Planning and Zoting's condition: Planning and Zoning Public HeaingJune | /h: 2014: Condirional IJse Perrnit (l/eiryn thireless) for a 70' monopole to be located at 344 IVert 4'' South, and to inclade one condition: /. The setbacks shall be relaxed so that the llwer cafl be placed as specifed. Development Code: (Chapnr / /, Section 7.b.iu of the CiU 0f RexburgDeuelopnent Code requires that towers be setback "a distance equal to at least seueng fue percent (7 5%) of the height of the tower -fr* ouJ aQ'oining lot /ine". Furthermore Tabk / of the said nction requires the cell tower to be constructed a distance of 200 feet or 300% of the height of tower whicheuer is greaterfrom single fanilt or duplex residential units and / 00 feet or / 00% of the beight of the tower wbicheuer is greaterfrom multi-fami! residential. Setback reqairements ma1 be reduced fu the PdzZ Connission.) The Standard CUP requirenents stated in the Deuelopnent Code No./026 ("Standards Applicable to ConditionalUse Perrnits" Section 6./ 28) W/!l to the Conditional Use Perrnit. Council Membet Wolfe seconded the motion; Mayor \Woodland asked for a vote: Those voting aye Council President Smith Council Membet Mann Council Membet Busby Council Member Wolfe The motion catried. Those votins nav None ffiqaowu 14q w Certificqle of Mqiling Cily of Rexburg Phone: 208.359.3020 Fox: 208.359.3022www.rexourg.org OF REXBURG Am eri cai Fan ily Com mu nilv35 North l.t Eosf Rexburg, lD 83440 File#: lqoc2L l File Name, Lt4 'l/1.''V'* 1'Jtub^'plr'r{e,'J 3qq *. qtt- s' I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing Notice was this it n'9'- day oftlt-vr-p-' .201V mailed to the following parties: // (See attached Mailing List) By:?.Qo*^u-11u.Few,^-- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that two Public Hearings will be held before the Planning & ZontngCommission of the City of Rexbutg,Idaho, Thutsday,June 19, 201,4 at 7:05 P.M. andT.20 P.M", at City HaIl located at 35 North 1't East, Rexburg, Idaho, regarding Permits #1,4 00220 and #1,4 00221.: 1,. Public Headng at7:05 P.M. for Permit #1,4 00220 CUP requested by Verizon rX/ireless for a 150'Monopole at 1076 West Main, in Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Leoal Descriodon:- Commencing 760 feet east of the Southwest corner of Section 24, Township 6 North, Range 39 East, Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and running thence East 206.5 feet; thence North 485.2 feet; thence'V7est 206.5 feet; thence South 485.2 feet to the point of beginning. This ptoperty is in the City of Rexbwg Impact Area. 2. Public Hearing at7:20 P.M. for Permit#l4 00221 CUP requested by Vetizon \X/ireless for a 70'monopole at 344 $7est 4th South in Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Lesal Description: The West 6 Yz rods of Lot 4, Block 1 of the I(lingler Addition to the City of Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, as per the recorded plat thereof, toget}er with an easement for ingress and egress across the \D7est 18 feet of the \West 6 Yz rcds of said Lot 4, Block 1. Less the South 5 rods of the \West 6 Yt rods of said Lot 4, Block 1. At such hearings the Pianning &Zonng Commission will hear all persons and all objecdons and recofirmendadons relative to such proposed permits. The City Clerk will also accept wdtten com-ments ^tCitly Hall prior to 4:00 P.M. onJune 1.8th,2074. This notice is given pumuant to the provisions of Section 67-6509 and 67-651,1 Idaho Code, and all amendments thereof. 2014. CiTY OF REXBURG Blafu D. IQy, City Clerk 2014 CARDONS LLC P O BOX 51298 IDAHO FALLS,ID 83405 ADAMS DAVID B 2429 BORDONA DR RIVERBANK, CA 95367 CAPELLA CORP 1643 HARRISON ST S TWIN FALLS , ID 8330I SMITH STEPHEN P O BOX 846 REXBURG,ID 83440 LEE JORDAN C 4949E NADOTTI RD STOCKTON, CA 85215 CONDIE CRAIG I167 DILLARD CT SAN JOSE . CA 95128 SEAMONS GARTH 2159 ROBISON DR REXBURG,ID 83440 GREAT AMERICAN FLOWER SHOP LLC l77S4THW#8 REXBURG,ID 83440 STORAGEBAY REXBURG LLC 22908 WARWICKAVE FRESNO.CA9372O JACOBSON ELIZABETH R 370S3W REXBURG,ID 83440 CENTRAL STORAGE LLC 42268400N RIGBY .ID 83442 APPLETREE APARTMENTS 1 LLC 347 S 4TH W REXBURG.ID 83440 HALES CHARLES B 355 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 SMITHTODD 850 V/ 5000 s REXBURG.ID 83440 MURRAY THOMAS R 3531 S 166l W REXBURG.ID 83440 CORP OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST FL22 SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84150 DRISKILL LOIS YOUNG C/O 317 W 3RD S REXBURG.ID 83440 HOPEMANAGEMENTC/O 4696 OVERLAND RD STE I4O BOISE,ID 83705 STOTT LYALL 390 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 KESLERBRETT 517 PARTRIDGE LN REXBURG.ID 83440 ABBOTT GAROLD L 365 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 BEEBEREGINA 369 W 3RD S REXBURG,ID 83440 HANCOCK DEAN 667 3350 MENAN,ID83434 STANDAGE CHRISTOPHERL 306 S 3RD W REXBURG.ID 83440 NIEDERERRULONB 327 W 3RD S REXBURG,ID 83440 CURTIS GAYNELL 335 W 4TH S REXBURG.ID 83440 GORDO ELISEO 325 S 3RD W REXBURG,ID 83440 HOPEMANAGEMENTC/O 4696 OVERLAND RJ STE I4O BOISE.ID 83705 ROBBINS DAVID S II 359 W 3RD S REXBURG.ID 83440 RICKS ROBERT L 338 S 3RD W REXBURG,ID 83440 TAYLORTIM 522ISLAND ST REXBURG,ID 83440 PAGE BRYAN I2O8 WASHINGTON ST HELENA, MT 5960I RAMIREZ ruAN M C/O 358 S 3RD W REXBURG,ID 83440 WILLIAMS LANE 737 ENGLEMAN ST REXBURG.ID 83440 PERRENOUD KAY H 335 S 4TH W REXBURG.ID 83440 RICKS CARLA J 338 S 3RD W REXBURG.ID 83440 RICKS ROBERT L 345 BARE ST REXBURG " ID 83440 10,tl tg ,/Research NEedgdiFor: RPROOOKOOOROAD ,/' ADAMS DAVID B 2429 BORDONA DR RIVERBANK. CA 95367 APPLETREPAPARTMENTS I LLC 347 S 4TH REXBURG,Iq83440 CARDONS POBOX5 IDAHO F LS, .,, CENTR,AL STORAGE LLC 4226 E 40CIN RIGBY ,,,'ID',g3442 CONDIE CRAIG I167 DILLARD CT SAN JOSE ,CA95128 /Research [e'6ded For: RPR000P00..gROAD ABBOTT GAROLD L 365 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 / cunri\s1ffier.r 33s w 4TF[Q REXBVRG , IE-\83440 APPLETREE APARTMENTS I LLC 347 S 4TH W REXBURG,ID 83440 BEEBEREGINA 369 W 3RD S REXBURG,ID 83440 CARDONS LLC P O BOX 51298 IDAHO FALLS,ID 83405 CITY ORREXBURG 35 N lSTv' REXBU+,G ;rD93440 CORP OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST FL22 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 DRISKILL LOIS YOUNG ClO 317 W 3RD S REXBURG,ID 83440 HOPEMANAGEMENTC/O 4696 OVERLAND RD STE I4O BOISE,ID 83705 HALES CHARLES B 355 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 KESLERBRETT 5I7 PARTRIDGE LN REXBURG,ID 83440 CAPELLA CORP 1643 HARRISON ST S TWIN FALLS.ID 8330I CENTRAL STORAGE LLC 42268400N RIGBY "1D83442 REXBURG E rD 83440 CURTIS GAYNELL 335 W 4TH S REXBURG.ID 83440 GORDO ELISEO 325 S 3RD W REXBURG,ID 83440 HOPEMANAGEMENTC/O 4696 OVERLAND RD STE I4O BOISE.ID 83705 HANCOCK DEAN 667 3350 MENAN.ID83434 ',/t/APPLETRSE 4"FAnrVeNrS r 347 S4rHv REXBURgNDs344o '|, \.,\ LLC GREAT AMERICAN FLOWER SHOP LLC l77S4THW#8 REXBURG,ID 83440 /r/HALES\€H4XLES B 3ss BAREtrr REXBU+qrD 83440'\ JACOBSON ELIZABETH R 370S3W REXBURG,ID 83440 KESLE\ #rtt5I7 PARTRIDGE LNREXBtr,ID 83440 /\ /,t LEE JORDAN C 49498 NADOTTI RD STOCKTON. CA 85215 PAGE BRYAN I2O8 WASHINGTON ST HELENA, MT 5960I RAMIREZ JUAN M C/O 358 S 3RD W REXBURG,ID 83440 MURRAY THOMAS R 3531 S 166l W REXBURG.ID 83440 PERRENOUD KAY H 335 S 4TH W REXBURG.ID 83440 RICKS CARLA J 338 S 3RD W REXBURG.ID 83440 RICKS ROBERTL 338 S 3RD W REXBURG,ID 83440 SEAMONS GARTH 2159 ROBISON DR REXBURG.ID 83440 SMITHTODD 850 W s000 s REXBURG,ID 83440 STOTT LYALL 390 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 WILLIAMS LANE 737 ENGLEMAN ST REXBURG " ID 83440 NIEDERERRULONB 327 W 3RD S REXBURG " ID 83440 ,u*"oL/*ot"::s s +rryfu REXBUTG,\D 83440 \f zucKS 6e\6e l 338 s 3RPE REXBURG.ID 83440 o.*u"rio,::s s:v nsxsf\ ID 83440 RICKS ROBERT L 345 BARE ST REXBURG.ID 83440 ROBBINS DAVID S II 359 W 3RD S REXBURG " ID 83440 SMITH STEPHEN P O BOX 846 REXBURG.ID 83440 STORAGEBAY REXBURG LLC 22908 WARWICKAVE FRESNO.CA93720 TAYLORTIM 522ISLAND ST REXBURG.ID 83440 *oro\t/ARrH zrsg noB$oN DR npxsu(c\ID 83440 ro"\/r,t 338 S 3tD W nn<y'u\, too STANDAGE CHRISTOPHERL 306 S 3RD W REXBURG.ID 83440 oo PIN OwnerName PrimarvContactHouseNumberPredir RPROOOKOOOROAD RPROOOPOOOROAD RPR00SE0111860ABBOTT GAROLD L Y 36s RPR000P0102890ADAMS DAVID B Y 2429 RPR000K0013010APPLETREE APARTMENTS 1 LLC Y 347 S RPROOOKOOL39TLAPPLETREE APARTMENTS 1 LLC Y 347 s RPR000K0013981APPLETREE APARTMENTS 1 LLC Y 347 s RPR00SE0110191BEEBE REGINA Y 369W RPR000K0013990CAPELLA CORP Y 1643 RPR000K0040130CARDONS LLC Y c RPR000K00402LOCARDONS LLC Y c RPR000K00t297LCENTRAL STORAGE LLC Y 4226E RPR000K0013000CENTRAL STORAGE LLC Y 4226E RPROOSEOOOROADCITY OF REXBURG Y 35N RPROOSEOl.lROADCITY OF REXBURG Y 35N RPR00SE0111450CONDIE CRAIG Y LL67 RPR000P0093011CORP OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE Y 5CE RPR000K0040090CURTIS GAYNELL Y 335W RPR000K0040110CURTIS GAYNELL Y 335W RPR00SE0110050DRTSKTLL LOrS YOUNG C/O Y 3L7 W RPR00SE0101630GORDO ELISEO Y 32s s RPR00S80110102 GREAT AMERICAN FLOWER SHOP LLC Y t77 S RPR000K0040051HOPEMANAGEMENTC/O Y 4696 RPR000P0110051 H O P E MANAGEMENTC/O v 4696 RPR000K0011830HALES CHARLES B Y 355 RPR00SE0111830HALES CHARLES B Y 355 RPR00SE0110170HANCOCK DEAN v 667 RPR000P0104570IACOBSON ELIZABETH R v 374s RPR000P0092351KESLER BRETT Y 5L7 RPR00SE0102351KESLER BRETT Y 5L7 RPR000K0014950LEE JORDAN C Y 4949 E RPR00SE0111570MURRAY THOMAS R Y 3531s RPR00SE0110070NIEDERER RULON B Y 327W RPR000K00L4920PAGE BRYAN Y 1208 RPR000K0012500PERRENOUD KAY H Y 33ss RPR00SE0112600PERRENOUD KAY H Y 335s RPR000P0103610RAMIREZ JUAN M C/O Y 3s85 RPR000K0011501RICKS CARLA J Y 338s RPR000P0101501 RICKS CARLA J Y 338s RPR00SE0111501RICKS CARLA J Y 338s RPR000K0011810RICKS ROBERT L Y 338S oo RPR00SE0111810RICKS ROBERT L Y 345 RPR00SE0110161ROBBINS DAVID S II Y 359W RPR000P0105071SEAMONS GARTH Y 2L59 RPR000P0105080SEAMONS GARTH Y 2159 RPR000K0014980SMITH STEPHEN Y 0 RPR00SE0110131SMITH TODD Y 85CW RPR00SE0110010STANDAGE CHRISTOPHER L Y 306S RPR000K00L2930STORAGEBAY REXBURG LLC Y 229CE RPR00SE0110911STOTT LYALL Y 39C RPR000K0011520TAYLOR TIM Y 338 RPR00SE0111520TAYLOR TIM Y s22 RPR00SE0110970WILLIAMS LANE Y 737 oo StreetName StreetSuffix PostDirSecUnitUnitNumberCitv State zip BARE ST REXBURG ID 8344C BORDONA DR RIVERBANK CA 95367 4TH W REXBURG ID 8344C 4TH W REXBURG ID 8344C 4TH W REXBURG ID 8344C 3RD s REXBURG ID 8344C HARRISON ST S TWIN FALLS ID 83301 PO BOX 5r.298IDAHO FALLS ID 83405 PO BOX 51298IDAHO FALLS ID 83405 40c N RIGBY ID 83442 40c N RIGBY ID 83442 1ST E REXBURG ID 8344C 1ST E REXBURG ID 8344C DILLARD CT SAN JOSE CA 95128 NORTH TEMPLE ST FL 22 SALT LAKE CIW UT 84150 4TH S REXBURG ID 83440 4TH S REXBURG ID 83440 3RD s REXBURG ID 83440 3RD W REXBURG ID 83440 4TH W s I REXBURG ID 83440 OVERLAND RD 5TE L4C BOISE ID 83705 OVERLAND RD STE L C BOISE ID 8370s BARE ST REXBURG ID 83440 BARE ST REXBURG ID 83440 33s0 MENAN ID 83434 3 W REXBURG ID 8344C PARTRIDGE LN REXBURG ID 8344C PARTRIDGE LN REXBURG ID 8344C NADOTTI RD STOCKTON CA 85215 t66L W REXBURG ID 8344C 3RD S REXBURG ID 8344C WASHINGTON ST HELENA MT s9501 4TH W REXBURG ID 8344C 4TH W REXBURG ID 8344C 3RD W REXBURG ID 83440 3RD W REXBURG ID 83440 3RD W REXBURG ID 83440 W REXBURG ID 83440 3RD W REXBURG ID 83440 oo BARE ST REXBURG ID 8344C 3RD s REXBURG ID 8344C ROBISON DR REXBURG ID 8344C ROBISON DR REXBURG ID 83440 PO BOX 846 REXBURG ID 83440 s00c s REXBURG ID 83440 3RD W REXBURG ID 83440 WARWICK AVE FRESNO CA 93720 BARE ST REXBURG ID 83440 3RD W REXBURG ID 0 ISLAND ST REXBURG ID 83440 ENGLEMAN ST REXBURG ID 83440 .tlfl; oo Staff Review ConditionaL use Permit Y errzolr \)fireles s Monop ole 344 Sfest 4ft South I I CI] Y OF REXBIIRG lo""RrY ID Community Development Deportment STAFF REPORT Phone: 208.359.3020 Fax: 208.359.3022 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: PROPBRTY OW]\ER: PURPOSE: PROPERTY LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING DISTRICT: APPLICABLE CRITERIA: AUTHORITY BACKGROTJND The request is for a new cell tower located in a storage lot adjacent to 4th South. IL SITE DESCRIPTION The project is located at344 West 4ft South. The lot is next to a residential neighborhood to the North. NI. ANALY$S Chapter 11, Section 6.b.i. of the City of Rexburg Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) when a tower is to be constructed in any zone except "Industrial or Heavy i1 m erica\ Fami iy Canmunity Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application, file #14 04221 Verizon Wireless Monopole -344 West 4th South Verizon Wireless 1894 West 1690 South Woodscross, UT 84487 Central Storage LLC 42268ast400 North Rigby,ID Requesting a Conditional Use Permit fot a70'monopole- 344 West 4e South Rexburg,ID 83440 RPR000K0012971 Neighborhood Commercial/lVlixed Use Community Business Center City of Rexburg Development Code (Ordinance Code 1026) - $ 6.12 Conditional Use Permits $ 6.12 (F) (7) "All other conditional use permits may only be granted after review and recommendation by the Commission and approval by the Ctty Council..." Case No.14 00221 Page I t l. 2. 3. Commercial". Chapter 11, Section 7.b.iv of the City of Rexburg Development Code requires that towers be setback "a distance equal to at least seventy five percent (75%) of the height of the tower from any adjoining lot line". Furthermore Table I of said section requires the cell tower to be constructed a distance of 200 feet or 300% of the height of tower whichever is greater from single family or duplex residential units and 100 feet or 100% of the height of the tower whichever is greater from multi-family residential. The section allows these setback requirements to be reduced by the P&Z Cornmission. Section T.b.ii.requires when applying for a Conditional Use Permit, the following factors shall be taken into account: Height and elevation of the proposed tower; Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries; Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties; 4. Surrounding topography; 5. Surrounding tree coverage and foliage; 6- Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness; 7. Proposed ingress and egress; and 8. Availability of suitable existing towers, other structures, or alternative technologies not requiring the use of towers or structures, as discussed in Section 7(bX3) of this ordinance The following are the criteria for granting a conditional use permit from Section 6-12 of the City of Rexburg Development Code. Some of the criteria are followed by stafPs analysis. A conditional use will: o. Constitute a conditional use as established in Table 1, Zoning Dktricts, Table 2, Land (Ise ScheduIe. A CUP is required as per Chapter I I of the Development Code. b. Be in accordance with a specffic or general objective of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the regulations of the City of Rexburg Development Code. Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3 (Private Property Rights) and Chapter 5 (Economic Development) of tlre Comprehensive Plan would support the right and need for cell towers. Development Code (Ordinance 1026) This use is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit as per the City of Rexburg Development Code Section I 1. Case No.l4 00221 Page 2 Be designed and constructed in a manner to be harmonious with the existing churacter of theneighborhood and the zone in which the property is locsted. The neighborhood is currently comprised of multi-family, single family, and commercial lands. Not create a naisance or safety hazardfor neighboring properties in terms of excessive noiseor vibration, improperly directed glare or heat, electrical iiterlerence, odors, dust or uirpollatants, solid waste generation and storage, hazardous materials or wasle, excessive trofficgeneration, or interference with pedestrian traffic. Staffdid not have concerns. Be adequately semed by essential publicfacilities and services such as access streets, policeandfire protection, drainage structares, refase disposal, water ond sewer service, ani schools.If existingfocilities are not adequate, the developir shall show that suchfacilities shatl beupgraded sufficiently to serve the proposed use. The City Engineer did not have concerns. Not generate traffic in excess of the capacity of public streets or access points serving theproposed use and will assure adequate visibility at traffic access points. The City Engineer did not have concems. Be effictively buffered to screen adjoining propertiesfrom adverse impacts of noise, buildingsize and resulting shadow, traffic, and parking. The Commission should take testimony and determine if there is a negative effect on theneighboring parcels and the view from 4th South. Be compatible with the slope of the site and the capacity of the soils and will not be in an areaof nataral hazards unless saitobly designed to protect iivis und property. N/A i' Not resalt in the destruction, loss or damage of a historicfeature of signtJicance to thecommuniQt of Rexbarg. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission take public testimony, and determine if there is need forsetback requirements of 75%o of tower height from adjoining lot lines, need to be co-locatable for 3users, and if there is a need for any buffering, landscaping or other requirements as per the analysissection above. il o h. IV. Case No.l4 00221 Page 3 Community DeYelopmenl Deporlment Plonning & Zoning City of Rexburg Phone: 208.359.3020 www.rexburg.org Fox:20g.359.3022 OF 35 Norfh lst Eosl Rexburg, lD 83440 REXBTJITG Am eri c ais Family Community The CUP application request was teviewed. There were no Public Works concems. Requesting a Conditional Use Permit for. a,70'monopole tou/er at the specified location. Property Location: 344 West 46 South Communily Developmenl Deporlmenf r*€\''"""'"n : Zonins ;:il "u:;'" wPhone: 208.359.3020 Fox: 208.359.3022 Fire Deoartrnent Staff Review Comments Conditional Use Permit Application F'ile #14 00221 - Verizon Wireless Monopole - 344 West 4e South Requesting a Conditional Use Permit for r70'monopole tower at the specified location. Property Location: 344 tVest 4e South The CUP application request was teviewed. There were no Fire Departmeflt concerns. o o? Staff Review Conditio naL LIse Permit Y errzon Wireless Monopole 1076 \West Main I I rlat, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that two fy![. Hearings will be held before the planning &Zontng Commission of the City of Rexburg, Idaho, Thursd"ay,June 19, 2074 at7:05 p.M. andT:2o f'M', at City Hall located at 35 North 1" Eist, Rexburg, Idaho, regarding permits #14 00220 and,#14 00221: 1" Public Hearing at7:05 P.M. for Permit #14 00220 CIJP requested by Verizon Wireless for a150' Monopole at 1,076 west Main, in Rexburg, Madison ctunty, Ijaho, and moreparticularly descdbed as follows: Legal Description: Commencing 760 feeteast of the Southwest corner of Section 24, Township 6 North, Range 39East, Boise Meridian, Ma{igon County, Idaho, and running thence East206.5 feet; thence Norh485'2 feet; thence West 206.5 feet; thence South 485.2 feel. to the point of beginning. This property is in the City of Rexburg Impact Area. 2' Public Hearing at7:20 P.M. for Permit#14 00221 CLJP requested by Verizon \wireless for a70' monopole at 344 $7est 4th South in Rexburg, Madison ioonty, Iiaho, and moreparticularly described as follows: Legal Descdption: The West 61/z rods of Lot 4, Block 1 of the l(ingler Addition to the City of Rexbug, Madisoncounty, Id1ho, as per the recorded plat thereof, tgeth.r with an easement for ingress and egressacross the West 18 feet of the West 6 1/z rods of sald Lot 4,Block 1. Less the South 5 rods of theWest 6 1/z tods of said Lot 4, Block 1. At such hearings the.Planning &_Zoning Commission will hear all persons and all objections andrecommendations rel*ive to such proposed permits. The City Clerk $rill also accept writtencomments ^t City Hall pdor to 4:00 p.M. on June 18th, 2014. This notice is given pursuant to the provisions of Section 67-6509 and,67-6571 Idaho code, and allamendments thereof. DATED..this 27th day of May,20'1.4. CITY OF REXBURG Blail D.IGy, City June 74,2074 .9 i AEJE in .b-i.,-q i'i rE ; s fi:iu-3 S E ;! e 6p 4 EH?Fi 15 : -C: € Fea < u!,!(.xvo:.rc)r!a * irq"ET frjta E ,.!fE E i*.t a -.o€ : *^9.E sFHE AF H S iotA\- - q€g E! E aYF ! ---'{*oq)i$ x 6l cl E+ ;94;5 gs $3r #sE H€ 8.AEi: Es F;ft9 fie sa !g ,'EFE€ r€ i e g E E 14 :4"t u1o .q) nli'h0 L q) q)o o t liq) q) b0 tt$ c) 6l t ()c)!t q)( tq) v,r o aia a0L Xc) U q) Lq) bJD I l\l q)I =' t+ o'.'!' (a {r' 0q)' KI o\i 3t( \3 \ >n( -)+'v\'1 1;'.u '-- , J- 'j L- \--:\s \€u Jr <?<rl .n '<) )+J..\ '4. )2k :-'c. 5 -=\ \\5'a-r-r +-' ar<.)--> i;..i fd ,(.X Xpress Bill Pay - Transaction Details ,(]t?:{i {}}] RMKSUK# u\o--^*-' "" - ;ir*'ri! al ili*xd1, {.1,.*.8xr*..r,i4, Billing Information JARED WHITE JARED WHITE .84087 City of Rexburg 35 Northist East Rexburg, lD fi44A Transaction Details XBP Confirmation Number: 1453699 Page 1 of 1 Print - Close TATAL:s9A0.0a Transaction taken by: mary LISA - oc ti'r Ut{ | qoo zzo n ,l1r,.oo h, U.f ltl oa zz t aloA. oo . | ' t rr t Vl-tv'^**U-tr ((z-'o 0lo1 v b, ryLil-.?4_ ,l ' rr l llV.L't_t"y* Wr I tLXQ/fx-Y?q ut' q+ 's. A"^-fdLo lTransaction detail for payment to C]tt; R""b*$Date: 05127 t201 4 - 9:41 :47 AMTransaction Number: 261 O2g2ZpTVisa X[X-)fiXX-XXXX-901 2 https ://www. xpressbillpay. com/utils/printerFriendly. php s/27/2014 City of Rexburg Receipf#: 2004 Date:5/27/2014 t-U-CUppU e- Conditionat Use public;il; Fee Total Amount Due: Total payment: Code: REXBURG_Re cpt2004 27 _5 2014_elainemReceived By: elainem Condilionqf Use permil City of Rexburg 35North I'rEosf Rexburg, tD Bj44O www.rexburg. Applicant CUP: 9250.00 blication: $200.00 $450.00 Name: Verizon (Jared White)Address: 1894 West 1690 south 6i6. wOOdscross Stut., ut Zip:84087 phone: 801 -232-0953 Owner (Complete if ownet not applicant) Name: Central Storage LLC Address: 344 west 4th south City: r€xburg State' ut Zip,83460 phone: 208-201-12gg Property to be Covered by permit: Address: 344 west 4th south rexburg lD g3440 *gal Description of the properry Q,ot, Bloclg Addition, Division Number)Attached *Please see sections 612 & 6'9 of the Rexbutg Development code fot rcIevant afiachmen, that must beincluded with this application. Nature of Request (Briefly explain the proposed use)Verizon wireless is seeking approval to construct a new 70' monopore adjacent to the existing storage units on the property Existing use of property: Storage Units \Vill this have an impact on school5: f,,to Requirements for Granting conditionar use permit The followinginformation ttill atti't the commission and city co'ncil to determine if your proposal will meet therequirements under the zoning ordinance. 1' what is the estimated water usage Per month? Are the existing mains adequate to provide fire protection?NA 2. Vlhat is the estimated sewer usage per month?STill pretreatment be necessary? 3' what is the estimated daily taffic to be generated? !7il1 thetrucksP NA traffic be primarily private vehicles or commercial i;lf,::ffi;:1,*"fj::-at,ot ahome occupation, whatwiu be the hours of operation?Site operates :.yfl.1"#;J::1*ffilio*t*'o on site? Is an existing stom drun avutable? rs it at capacity/ rf so, will 6' If ptoposed use is residential, describe number and type of dwelling units. will this be student housing: multi-family for young families, singles and couples, or eldedy? NA 7' what provision hut.!:tl made for fire protection? where is th-e near-est fue hydrant? Is any point of thebuilding firrther than 150 feet fiom accesJsufficient in width for fire fighrng equipment?Location of crosest fire hydrant is unknown but access direcfly to the site is sufficient. 8' How much parking is being provided on-site? Do the aisle widths and access points comply with the ordinancetequirements? Has landscaping been provided in accordurr.. *rh the ordinance? NA 9' \w-here will solid waste genelated be stored? Is access adequate for the city collection? i?; f#,i"ffJ"ffi:::,1:*Jjr#^be€enetated bv the use? r*4rat are the hours ornoise generation? 11' vThat .'pe of equipment wiil be used in the conduct of the business? Radio/ceruar Equipment 12.'What are the surrounding land uses?Surrounding uses are storage units and residential Has buffering been provided as required by the ordinance? t1. O* any ait qualiry permits required?Is dirt or other dust cteating materiars moved by open trucks or box cars? 14. lfill the parking lots or othe_t outdoor areas have jighting? 15' Are passenger loading zones for such us-es-as daycatecenters and schools provided? How is busing routed?comrnercial uses, where are the roading docks? I. th.r. ,;A;d, space for truck parhngr 16' rf a commercial' multi-family' or public assembly use, where is the neatest coflector street? Arterial street?NA ll,K:'ifl:t;:lfftfl|is anticipated in connection with the proposed usage?FAA,/FCC required signage The P&Z commission or city council rnay address other points than those discussed above, but a narrativet'$Jsfr ?r?l€1ili",I'#',lry:;:*i*:'$i;;::."'ft vo'rapp,ica,ionf, t'3;"f ffi '1HH'J,3"'.*ffi iffi #*3jiTJ"fi sffi ';fi rsApplrcArToNrnc,uded ' lfffi3;t*ttt#ffi::?fftrffi;.|:,,ffi and, anvother documents you are submitting with it ' #"i.0o#oT;H:T|!:tfiH.be processed with due dirisence and wll be schedured, dependenr o Formal nodce will be s:nt-t9 the applican t afye-rapproval of a conditionar use permit. Notice will state theconditions of the permit' tf conditiin, ur. ,.iolat.d o, ,rot *.t there wil be ^-ro-a^yperiod to cure theptoblem' Failure to cornply with the tems may result in revocation of the conditionar Use permit. For Signature ofApplicant €=j By:c 6l.9 ;'.'PE>3E !$;s$g ;i;EEi €gi.sE; < s:! gi F#i:€E Eg; € iE ;==: ;F: gtg Ea*5 FeI6tror- +lc!i;Eu " I:a€Eg! !Fg !EE3 ;;ri ijs; g;f =ia: :5g =$i;j .iFiisi5$g 3iss' I Affidovif of legol lnierest Ciiy of Rexburg 35 Norlh lsr Eosi Rexburg, tD 83440 www.rexburg.org Phone: 208.559.5020 Fox: 208.359.3022 State of Idaho County of Madison ,, Central Storage LLC, (Cherri%ffen)9!4 West 4th SouthName Address ID ti tTg *r RfiffiURG ",tE rr&:y,ft i{e*il& #rylrrrri.*ig. Rexburg City Being first clulv su,orn upon oath, clepose and s21.; permission 1s. v"ri.on Wr"l"., f;"r"c frif.lirt"l (If Applicant is also Or.vner of Record, skip to B) That I am the Lecorcl ,rrermio.i,_._ ,.-.. ,,^-;_^_ ,:.tn"t of the property clescribeci :ll lll" auached, and I grant m1,1 894 West 1 690 South, Woods Cross UT 84087 State Name B. I agree to indemnjfv, deFend and hcctaim nr ti"biil;;:ii,Tlllll,l"l_fc'lr]nexuurg cl+ and rts emplc,yees hanntesso wn ership ", ji$1:f:.?Tfr.?,1: i*n,:: :: *ffi ;mLs c o n,ain e d h erein Datecl this 5- 7 - r, . W* doy ur %,a,y , zo Addresstr,r submit the accompanying application perraining to that propeny. Subscribed and sworn to befor-e me the day anci year first above \r-rltten. N.rtin'Public of IclE Residing at: From anv or as to the Signature scorr wErJJFlqLL, NorA;i PUBGI fi ' cc,m m iss'fF.Spl$S.f r nio-ai', DAfd'