The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutALL DOCS - 12-00191 - 900 S 5th W - The Dunes Apartments - Prelim Platt,' Finol Plqt Cify of Rexburg Phone: 208.359.3020 Fox: 208.359.3022 i'til,.j, , ;'i"J\" ation confer.fitE'i tr!, ili-t -,r !i)',;r! irui;ifltattt' staff is required prior to the submittal of this application. n The attached Subdir-ision plan has been prepared in accordance rvith the Subdi.,.ision Regulations of the Citv of Rexburg, and the follouing items are sho'uvn on the plan or plans, or explanations given with respect thereto. / F(eolllrelTlenls T()r l-rellllllnafv 4,rlllJM Sgbmit eighteen (18) copies of application l5 S.rU*it five (5) copies o[ 24" x 36" foldable, drarvn to scale plans, North arrow, dated --z' [5 Submit eighreen (18) copies of 11" x 17" drau'n to scale plans The foliorving shall be shorvn on the Preliminary/Finai Plat or shali be submitted separateiv: 1. The name of the proposed subdir-isio t' T/u 'Qune'S 6Lro*t Lru"* * 2.Thetocation ?OX S & VJ ' Acreage /q'W{*-$:mberof Lots 3. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the subdir,-ider or subdir,-iders and the engineer or sufi-eyor rvho ptepared the plat: Cell Number:"757- 7L >5 Name: -- ( r r rt :\d.ooress: Phone Number:Cell Number: 4. The name and address of all properq- orvners rvithin 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subdivision rvhether or not bisected by a public right-of-wav as shorvn on record in the Counw Assessor's office. 5. The legal description of the subdirision (plgase attacb. Phone Number: j6g - I 6. A statement oF the intended use of the proposed subdivision, such as: Residential (single Family, nvo-tamily and multiple hor-rsing), Commercial, Industrial, Recreational or Agdcultural. Shorv sites proposed for parks, piavgrounds, schoois, churches or other public areas. 7. A mep oF rhe entire area scheduled ior development if the proposed subdir.ision is a portion of a larger holding intended for subsequent development. B. A viciniq' map shou'ing the relationship of rhe proposed plet to the surrounding area (I /2 rrile of minimum radius, scale optional). 9. Streets, street names, rights-of-u'ay, and roadlvav u.'idths, including adioining streets or roadrvavs, curbs and sidervalks. 10. Lot lines and blocks shorvins the dimensions and numbers of each. 11. Contour lines, shorvn at five (5) feet inten-als rvhere land slope is greater than ten percent (i0%) and at nvo (2) feet inten-als w'here land slope is ten percent (107o) or less, referenced to an established bench mark, including location and elevation. 12. Anl'proposed or existing utilities, inciuding, but not hmited to, storm and senitan'sewers, irrigarion laterals, ditches, drains, bridges, culverts, rvater mains, fire hydrants, Power, gas, street Lights and their respective profiles and easements. 13. A cop,v oF anv proposed restrictive covenants aLndf or deed restrictions. (fo be attached or submitted with final plat). 14. An,v dedications to the public andf or easements, together with a statement of locarion, dimensions, and purpose of such. Please complete the following: (IF not appl-icabie, please fili in r*ith N/A) 1. \X'hat is the land use and existing zoning of.the proposed subdir,'ision and the Lzz,n,/ r,tLL Ek i* I "J;;/' /.tuJ is 4G 2. Does the subdivision conform to present iorl.ns? l/'/; 3. Requested zoning: 4. \'ariance Requested: Yes/- No \d (li ves, attach u'rirren requesr) 5. Requestins annexation to Cit-v? Ni " : All applications that are complete wili be processed rvith due diligence and rvill be scheduled, dependent upon availabfitr, for an u adiacent land? Signatu fA i. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERA.TION 1. Probabie impact ol rhe proposed project on the enr-ironment effect on: a. Publ-ic safeqv and convenience b. Fire, police, and ambuiance sen-ices c. Recreation d. Schools e. Displacement or relocation of people f. Land values g. Local and long-distance travel, i.e., highrval'and local road impact h. Behavior of wildlife species i. \\'ager qualiry* and efi'ect on underground rvater supply j. Noise pollution k. Air pollution l. Nlethod proposed to dispose of srorm drainage \,"-arers m. Extent of increased ciw road maintenance, including snolv removal n' Flood plain - methods proposed to ailer,-iate effect of 100-vear flood; effect on adjacent properties, o. Pror,'isions for housing for persons of lorv and moderate income p. Harmonv with the character of surrounding developments 2' Probable adverse en'u-ironmental effects v-hich cannot be avoided a. Traffic LIse b. Rights-of-rvav required c. Pollution effect on existing enr,-ironment 3. Relationship berrveen local short-term uses of man's economic environment and the lons-term productiviqy a. Existing vs. proposed tar base b. Costs to City if proposal approved (annuai) 4. Ileasures taken to minimize harmful effects on environment a. Effects of construction activities b. Erosion control c. Stream pollurion prevenrion d. Borrorv-pit rehabilitation e. Fencing f. BuFfer zones g. Replacement of parklands or farmlands 5. Is this plat pian harmonious uith and in accordance rvith objective of the Citv's Comprehensive plan? Thank vou. the general objectives or rvith anv specific 4pri125,2012 Beginning at a point that is s00o16'38"8 1320.75 feet from the Northeast section corner of Section 36,Township 6 North, Range 39 East of the Boise Meridian, Madison county, Idaho said point of beginningalso being the Northeast corner (NE1/4) of the SE l/4, NE l/4 and,running thence sgg"47,40,,w l3lg.74feet to the Northwest corner of the SE i/+, Np 1/4 pointalso being on the-east boundary line for Henry,sFork Plaza; thence S00o24'13'E 624.53 feet along ruia Uounau.y line; thence Ng9o5g,03,,w 34.67 feetalong the South boundary line of Henry Fork Plia;thence s00i19,55,,E 695.g2feet to the Northboundary line of Tamana Fields; thencl N89"48'55;E 68.00 feet along said line;thence N00o19,55,'w565'49 feet to a point on a curve 20 feetradius and a distan ce of 3g.2g feet; thence Ngg%3,22,'E l25g.g3feet to the East section line of Section 36; thence along said East line N00o16,00,w 72g.00feet to thepoint of beginning; containing 23.06 acres. NorE: 3'06 ACRES oF THE Botb,rDARy DESCRIPTION IS THE crry ROAD RIGHT oF wAy. rDAHO FAILS {2OB) 542-2665 REXBURG (208) 359-266s Subject to: Existing easements of record. THE DTINES APARTMENTS Proposed Zoning of Medium Density Residential 2 AGLE ROCK NGINEERING Eagle Rock Engineering project No. 12034 35 Norih I'r Eosl Rexburg, lD 83440 www.rexburg.org Findings of Foct City of Rexburg Phone: 208.359.3020 Fox: 208.359.3022 The Dunes Apartments - Preliminary Plat Approximately 900 South 5'h !7est L. On Apdl 25,20't'2I{ut Roland of Eagle Rock Engineering presented to the Rexburg Planning &Zonng Coordinator a Request and.Application for a Preliminary Plat for The Dunes Apatments, to be located at approximately 900 South 5'h West. 2' On May 77 ,2012 Kut Roland ptesented to the Rexburg Planning & ZonngCommission the Request for approval of The Dunes Apartments Preliminary Plat. Dan Hanna motioned to recommend approval to City Council of the Preliminary Plat for The Dunes APartments to be located at apptoximately 900 South 5'h West, subject to additional pedestrian access at Henry's Fotk Plaza, and to meet density as specified. There was no second. Motion died. Dan Hanna motioned to recommend approval to City Council of the Preliminary Plat for The Dunes Apartments located at approximately 900 South 5'h !7est, subject to sufficient acre:age for 408 units, sidewalk connectivity to the west (Henry's Fork Plaza), and sidewalks and fre hydrants as required. Richie Webb seconded the motiorr. Cory Sotensen said he loves this plan. He wanted to go on record that he is frustrated with the proceedings tonight. Yes there is an engineer on staff, but to say the engineer is right every time is not right. He felt belittled. The commission is here for a reason, and it is to plan for the community. None opposed. Motion carded. 3. OnJune 06120t2 atCity Council the PreliminaryPlatfor the Dunes Apartments at approximately 900 South 5" \X/est was reviewed. Discussion: CITY OF REXBUKG cq, --------*- An e ri ca's Fa mily Ctm nuni ty Council Membet Merrill moled to approv-e the Preliminary Plat for the Dunes Apartments atapproximately 900 South 5'h Wesu Council Member Benfreli seconded the motion; MayotWoodland asked for a vore: Those voting aye Council President Mann Council Member Benfield Council Member Merrill Council Member Smith Council Member Suthedand The motion canied Those voting nay None CITY OF REXBURG c\, America\ Family Co mmunig Design Review Committee Meeting The Dunes Apartments - Approximately 900 South Sth West May31,2012- 11:00 am Attendees Design Review Committee: Winston Dyer andJohnny Watson Bruce Suthedand was excused. Applicant Guy Robertson and Zane Powell, tepresenting I{attchnet Homes Staff: Natalie Schneider and Elaine McFerrin The Design Review Committee meets if thete is a development issue that deviates from the design standards stated in the City of Rexburg Development Code Ordinance No. 1026. The applicant is currendy going through the approval process for a Conditional Use Permit and a Preliminaty Plat for this ptoperty. Building plans have not been submitted yet. Guy Robertson had brought in building elevations fot the planned 24-plexes to be looked at by staff before going futher and submitting building plans, and it was determined that a Design Review meeting would be necessary. The front and rcar building elevations meet Development Code design standatds. The issue before the Design Review Committee is that the right /left building elevations have a 40-foot section that may not have enough features to help break up the area. Windows, doors, and a change of materials and color are included as features on the plans. The elevations and site plan were viewed and discussed. Johnny Watson felt this issue of the elevation in question was fairly insignificant because of all the other details that the buildings have. There is a nice vaiety of textutes and colors. There is a nice feel and scale to the project. The Committee members came to a decision that the project would meet design standards requirements. For the record, Johnny Watson stated there is nothing here that would set negative precedent by approving the subject elevation as it stands. The Committee is looking at the development and large buildings as a vzhole in this perspective. Winston Dyer was in agteement v/ith Mr. Watson. The Committee requested that the applicant mask the utility meters so they are not visible ftom the street. The applicants were praised for the level of cnftsmanship in past projects. This new project will be a grcat addition and asset to the communiw. councilman Bruce Suthedand will review the building elevations and the decision made at today,s meeting, inorder that thete is consensus of the three Design Review Committee members on this issue.(on May 31,2012, councilman Suthedand reri.wed the subject .l.rr"tiom and site plan and agreed with thedecisions made at the Design Revievr Committee meeting.) t nunity Development I *""",0, Number: &&0,;|,,-,:i IITY iJF F:[XI'UF:A FAITI FT: HAETIHI{TI: HIIi'|ES ]i{[ IIATI I l]4r'16/11 TIi{t: i 1 :3S;4S burg, lD. 83440 :ax (208) 359-3022 F: PL*NiiII.IS SIOt{II{S FRD IP FIFIT PERii;T U}IN[F: i FI F'LAl.ltiIii|j s:[ii]r,tc FRfi lHttii An[uHT PAYHTI{T Lnfit{trL rERritT $ lt 00191 THAI'I}i YOU ANTI HA'J[ A iIIIE IIAY liG 'ril436i'ftiTR RIIEIFT ilfi; I5i98il F:tf l{ll:1tfii Ll. u=1 rlat e ent $259.9s $50.00 $0.05 Total: $259.95 $50.00 $0.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 s310.00 $310.00 $ 310.00 APR 2 6 ZO1Z clrY cI BEXBqRq