HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010.07.21 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES1
July 21, 2010
Mayor Richard Woodland Council Members:
Christopher Mann – Council President
Rex Erickson Donna Benfield
Bruce Sutherland Brad Egbert
Adam Stout
City Staff: Stephen Zollinger – City Attorney Richard Horner – Finance Officer John Millar – Public Works Director Val Christensen – Community Development Director Scott Johnson – Economic Development Director Blair Kay – City Clerk
7:00 P.M. City Hall – Pledge to the Flag
Shane Turman led the Pledge.
Cheryl Graham gave the opening prayer.
Roll Call of Council Members:
Attending: Council President Mann, Council Member Erickson, Council Member Benfield,
Council Member Egbert, Council Member Sutherland, Council Member Stout and Mayor
Woodland.
City Attorney Zollinger was excused.
Public Comment: on issues not scheduled on the agenda (limit 3 minutes):
Chris West at 215 East 1st South wanted to settle some disputes on a water fight held a few weeks
ago in Porter Park. He wanted City Council’s input as to why they were not permitted to hold the
second water fight they had planned for last Saturday. Mayor Woodland asked Economic
Development Director Scott Johnson to address the issues. Scott reviewed information on the
first water fight. After the first water fight there were some complaints made to city employees
from the public. One parent complained that a water fight participant pushed her child down at
the splash park so they could refill their water gun. City employees have also confirmed a young
boy was taken to the ER with an eye injury from a three-man balloon sling shot. A group that
large, without a gathering permit or a reservation of the park, is an obvious concern. Rexburg’s
Municipal Code, chapter 12, addresses those issues. The clean up was extensive, taking over 20
man hours for Parks Department employees to clean up debris from the first water fight. City
Employees have received other reports, which have not been verified, of participants filling their
foam noodles with sticks and using them to hit people. He feels it was out of concern, based on
compliance with the first water fight, that the second fight was cut short.
Mayor Woodland asked about the extent of the injuries to the boy hit by the balloon launcher.
He was treated for damage to his eye; he was also told if he had not been wearing sun glasses, he
might have lost his eye. They have not confirmed if there were any broken bones.
Ford Erickson from Centennial Apartments #4 knew the person that got hurt. He did go to the
Emergency Room and the person’s eye was blackened. Council Member Sutherland asked when
the first water fight was held. It was the 26th of June at Porter Park. Chris West said his kids go to
the park everyday; kids do get pushed off slides. While it was not deliberate, things like that do
happen. Council Member Sutherland said the spray park facility is for young children under age
10; it is a concern when college-age young men, in the midst of a heated water fight, act
35 North 1st East
Rexburg, ID 83440
Phone: 208.359.3020 x2313
Fax: 208.359.3022
blairk@rexburg.org
www.rexburg.org
City Council Meeting
July 21, 2010
2
inappropriately. There were injuries and other things their group did not anticipate, nor want to
happen. Council Member Sutherland can understand some reticence on their part. Chris West
acknowledged sometimes things get out of control. He knew injuries could happen; however, it
was good clean fun. He asked for consideration in the future. They felt like they were bullied by
the police officers at the park on Saturday. There was a lot of disconnect with the police officers
as to the reasons why they could not play.
Council Member Mann asked why they did not seek a permit.
Ford Erickson said he had the idea a year ago and so he threw the idea together on Facebook in
April. He did not know how big the event would be. As hype built up for the event, he thought
about going to get a permit; however, he was worried that it was getting so big and lots of people
were excited for it, so he did not try to get a permit, fearing he would get denied.
Council Member Mann appreciated his honesty. He said if they had come to the city it may
have been worked out to both parties’ satisfaction. Ford Erickson realized he was wrong in not
asking about a permit. Council Member Egbert recognized that this is an opportunity for good
clean fun, if it is done right. He said the damage could not be minimized, as far as little children
getting hurt. Chris West’s analogy of his children getting pushed off the slide regularly does not
apply. These were college-age kids that were pushing. If everyone with the opportunity to get
hurt consented to be there it would be different, but not when it spills over to affecting the little
kids on the play ground. His concern is public safety.
Council Member Sutherland indicated the University has several fields that could be used for
this type of event. Ford said he did not know how big the event would be. With his experience as
a past student, he thought it would be easier to just plan for the city park, rather than ask campus
administration. Council Member Sutherland said it is easier to ask for forgiveness than get
permission. Ford said he takes responsibility for what happened; he did not want anyone to get
hurt, especially those who were not there for the water fight. They put new rules in place for
safety with the second water fight.
Council Member Erickson indicated the University students were involved in organized
mayhem. He encouraged holding the event away from the general public. They might have more
luck getting approval in other locations. He does not want it to show on the record that City
Council approved organized mayhem at the public parks. Mayor Woodland asked what types of
weapons were restricted. Ford said water balloon launchers are banned inside the walking path.
They told participants not to shoot them straight at people. They also banned Styrofoam tubes,
which some people filled with sticks. People also put flour in socks, which became hard when
they got wet, and used them to hit people.
Council Member Egbert stated that with a group that large there will be people who get carried
away and cause problems. Ford said he would take responsibility for the cleanup. He had not
planned that part, but people stayed to clean up afterwards. He thought they left the park clean,
but people who came late may have left more of a mess. That is something they will plan better in
the future. They want to use the parks twice a year with appropriate signage and police protection.
Council Member Stout said he was personally concerned with safety for the public. He was not
opposed to the idea in a public park if it is organized with property security. It would probably be
best to find another venue.
Economic Development Director Scott Johnson said the city has to be concerned with liability
on public property. As the organizers of the event, they should be concerned with liability too.
Most events like this would have their own insurance to cover any injuries.
Steven Crusis at 135 South 1st East #2 asked on behalf of Steve Pope from Channel 3 News for
public information; how many of the City Council members are opposed to future water fights on
public property?
Council Member Erickson moved to not allow water fights (as discussed) on city parks, period;
Council Member Stout seconded the motion;
3
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
Mayor Woodland pointed out the outcome would have been the same for other groups as well,
whether it was high school kids or any other organization. He wanted them to know the college
students are considered a part of the community; they are residents. He appreciates their desire to
have fun too. Rexburg would not be here without them.
Steven Crusis said they were not informed of the ordinances when they came to the park last
Saturday. Some officers could not tell them what ordinances they were violating and why they
were being asked to leave. There are several students that feel they were being made an example.
Mayor Woodland said they were not trying to make an example of them. Their top concern for
the city is public safety. Their second concern is also public safety, and probably their third as
well. The city is liable, and they as the organizers are liable too. There have been events across
the nation, where people have been sued for the behavior of those that were invited. One of the
most famous examples is Woodstock; there were lawsuits and litigation that went on for years.
Events can get out of hand. He appreciated their orderly dispersal.
Irene Marlow at 142 Elm had a family reunion in Smith Park last Saturday. The park was
beautiful. They had a great time. She was grateful to show off a city she is proud to be a resident.
The Rexburg Madison Fire Department gave them some water while they were cleaning out their
hoses too. Mayor Woodland said the fire trucks were there to put water on the cyclists for the
“Race for the Romance”.
Committee Liaison Assignments for 2010:
A. Council Member Adam Stout Trails of Madison County · Traffic & Safety Committee · Airport Board
Council Member Stout said there may be a new airport board member, Chris West, who was just there
presenting. Mayor Woodland clarified that he has been nominated, but it still needs to be discussed with
the Airport Board. The details still need to be straightened out.
B. Council Member Brad Egbert Legacy Flight Museum · Parks & Recreation · IBC Committee
Council Member Egbert mentioned the Air Show this weekend. The Legacy Flight Museum
Board wanted to remind everyone about the Blue Angels show on July 24th and 25th in Idaho Falls.
C. Council Member Bruce Sutherland Museum Committee · Beautification Committee · Traffic & Safety
Committee
Council Member Sutherland reported that the Museum Committee, the Beautification Committee,
and the Traffic & Safety Committee did not meet last week.
D. Council Member Christopher Mann Emergency Services Board · School Board · MYAB
Council Member Mann reported the Emergency Services Board met in executive session. It was
quite a long meeting, but things were resolved. MYAB participated in the 4th of July parade. They
were on the float with the Mayor and other City Council Members. They had a good time. It was
a success.
E. Council Member Donna Benfield Police Department · Romance Theatre Committee · Rexburg Arts Council · Tabernacle Civic Center · School Board
Council Member Benfield reported on the “Ride for the Romance” race that Mayor Woodland
mentioned earlier. The demolition has begun on the theater; the facade is coming off. It is part of
an upgrade from a grant for $150,000.
4
There was a meeting with the School Board, but she was not able to attend. She asked Mayor
Woodland to report. Mayor Woodland met with the school superintendent, a couple of members
of the Madison School Board, as well as their Financial Officer. There were a few issues needing
to be resolved concerning billing with services rendered and the City’s contribution. It was a very
successful meeting. The city has some homework to do, but he felt these issues will be resolved.
F. Council Member Rex Erickson Golf Board · Planning & Zoning · Rexburg Redevelopment Agency
Council Member Erickson reported the Golf Board has not met. Planning & Zoning met and the only
topic to report on will be presented on the agenda tonight under Item 7-B. The Rexburg Redevelopment
Agency has not met since City Council’s last meeting.
(New Appointments deferred to Mayor’s Report) Mayor Woodland – Confirm new appointment of
Kent Hillman to the Rexburg Redevelopment Agency.
Council Member Mann indicated he will vote no for Cory Sorensen for Planning & Zoning because he is a developer. We need more people from the neighborhoods who represent families
on the commission.
Discussion on proposed Planning and Zoning Commission appointments: 1. Loraine Jackson 2.Cory Sorensen replacing Josh Garner.
As vacancies occur on the Planning and Zoning Commission, Loraine Jackson will be considered.
Discussion concerning candidates for city committees and the nomination and approval process.
The City Council needs to keep track of how long committee members serve. Council Member Benfield is not familiar with Kent Hillman and asked for input on his experience. Council
Member Erickson said he was Kent Hillman’s employer in the past. He is a builder by trade and a knowledgeable person. He is a good man. He was suggested by Community Development
Director Christensen.
Council Member Sutherland moved to approve Kent Hillman to the Rexburg Redevelopment Agency and Cory Sorensen replacing Josh Garner to the Planning and Zoning Commission; Council
Member Egbert seconded the motion;
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson Council Member Mann
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Benfield
The motion carried.
Public Hearings:
A. 7:30 P.M. RE-HEARING for a Zone Change from LDR2 to LDR3 at 5th South
west of Willowbrook Subdivision off 12th West – Kartchner Homes – Troy Kartchner
(BILL 1049 to rezone from LDR2 to LDR3)
Council Member Stout stepped down.
Troy Kartchner at 601 West 1700 South, Logan, Utah said the proposal was approved by
Planning and Zoning. He passed out pictures of the overall development. The rezone area, the
homes, and plans for the entire development were reviewed on the overhead screen. Homes are
being built on the south end of the development. Two churches are planned for the development.
The request will allow the road to be built sooner past the church off 12th West. Buyers will be
retirement age and younger families. He reviewed the parks and the club house that will be
included in the development. The platted areas were reviewed. A range of lot sizes are planned
for the different areas of the development. They have a 12 acre site on the interior that has not
been planned yet. Their goal is to first get the road in so the chapels can be built, which will help
move things along. He showed a slide of the twin home’s design. They would like to build with
rock and a hardy-board front and use vinyl for the siding. Planning and Zoning recommended
this zone change for approval.
5
Council Member Egbert asked about the homes square footage. The homes will have 1,500
total square feet for each twin home in a connected building. Twin homes are planned for the
smaller sized lots. A difficulty with the homes is they cannot build basements. With the irrigation
and high water level this year, they do not want to risk it. The streets and sidewalks have been
widened to improve safety measures. They are building a 6-foot sidewalk on 12th West for the
students. Council Member Egbert said one of the safety concerns was ingress/egress off 12th
West. They conducted traffic studies in the beginning stages of this plan. They have also worked
with staff and hired engineers to determine what they will need to help pay, considering the impact
their community will have on the roads.
Mayor Woodland asked about the distance between the homes. The distance is 12-15 feet.
Council Member Erickson asked if LDR3 allowed twin homes. Troy Kartchner said LDR2 and
LDR3 allow twin homes. They are planning for a denser product with a little more affordability.
Some of the land will be given up to build parks for the community, so they are asking to build a
little denser to compensate. It will add an additional 16 or 17 units in the area.
Council Member Erickson asked Commissioner Robinson if the Comprehensive Plan changes
from June were making this request a moot request. The Comprehensive Plan only shows single
family units, not zoning. Community Development Director Val Christensen explained the zones
are the same thing either way with the Comprehensive Plan. Troy Kartchner reviewed the history
of the first approval for LDR3; however, it was sold to the church. He would like to move the
previously approved zone change area to the west behind the church so they can still build the
development the way they planned. There is a market in the area for retirement and single-family
homes. It is an attractive product for an affordable home. It will improve the area because they
will also be helping with safety.
Those neutral to the proposal:
Irene Merrill at 2368 West 440 South asked how much area the twin homes will have in the front
yard. Mr. Kartchner will answer when he gives his rebuttal.
6
Those in favor: NONE
Those opposed to the proposal:
Judy Steiner at 417 South 12th West said we did this a month ago. The issues they had a month
ago are still issues today. They have an approved PUD. They can do studies and asked questions;
however, they have not seen the impact the students will have on traffic coming from the new
high school. Also, additional traffic will be coming from the hundreds of homes which have
already been approved. She does not know why they would want to add an additional piece of
land not included in the original PUD and make the homes closer together. The increased density
will add more traffic to 12th West. The road coming from the development comes out on 12th
West with no stop sign or traffic signal. She asked if Mr. Kartchner was widening 12th West more
than what they city has already planned. The church will be widening the road in front of the new
chapel. She asked why they would want to change it now when they have not yet seen the impact
of the new growth. She asked for patience. She wanted the PUD built first before this request is
approved.
Wan Southwick at 375 South 12th West said we have a plan and the plan was approved. He feels
like there is an element of bait and switch tactics involved. They had City Council approve
something and now they are coming back and trying to change it. That tactic makes him
uncomfortable. He is hoping City Council will protect their neighborhood; they are the only ones
that can. They thought it would be similar to the single family homes in the Willowbrook
Subdivision, but Kartchner has something much more dense planned. Only 12 feet is planned
between homes. The high density is disruptive to the nature of their neighborhood. They would
like it to be more like the development across the street.
Shandra Skolls at 1118 Coyote way has the same objections with the high density. Troy
Kartchner said it would increase density 16-17 homes. The original plan for the development,
which she was not necessarily in objection to, was a lot less dense. She thought it would increase
about 10%. The density does concern her. If they do approve this one, it’s not the end of the
world; her house will still be there. They may build a big wide road with a nice intersection. From
the meetings she has attended, she sees the pattern that if approval is granted in one area it is more
likely to happen again. The rural neighborhood areas are turning into dense, tight housing. She
recognizes there is justification for that in Rexburg, but we do not need it all in one place. We do
not need it where people have tried to establish a more open feel.
7
There was discussion on having a street light at the 12th West and 7th South intersection. There is
not a plan for a street light right now. Council Member Egbert said it is something they can
consider. Council President Mann said it is not budgeted for now. Mayor Woodland believes one
is projected to be there someday.
Rebuttal:
Troy Kartchner said each unit has a fenced yard. The lot sizes vary. The larger lots are 5,000 to
6,000 square feet. The smaller ones are approximately 4,500 square feet. Those lots are for the
twin homes. If it is re-zoned, the lots can be smaller. The project has over 18 acres of common
area for parks and play grounds. Originally the plan was to have a retirement community. It failed
financially. Therefore, they are seeking to put in retirement homes. He thought it was a good
project with smaller lots. He feels it preserves open space by keeping the homes close together.
Council Member Sutherland reviewed the LDR3 Zoning and the size of the original lot City
Council approved, which was sold to the LDS Church. The new re-zone area is about three acres
larger. Council Member Erickson reviewed the zoning around the proposed development. It is all
LDR2.
Mayor Woodland closed the public hearing.
Council Member Egbert reviewed the concerns about future traffic flow. He wanted to provide
good planning so the developer could prepare for the future. He appreciated the desire to watch it
grow first before approving more development. Council Member Sutherland asked how big the
park was planned. It is about an acre.
Mayor Woodland asked for a motion.
Council Member Sutherland said the community needs attractive affordable housing. He feels
it is a compromise considering the LDS Church bought the original property that was re-zoned.
Council Member Sutherland moved to approve the requested zone change from LDR2 to
LDR3 at 5th South west of Willowbrook Subdivision off 12th West for Kartchner Homes; Council
Member Egbert seconded the motion; Discussion: Council President Mann appreciated the great
job Troy Kartchner did on 7th South; however, he still feels sympathetic to the situation of the
neighbors. Council Member Benfield said the project looks great. She is aware of what the
neighbors are saying. One acre of green space does not sound like a lot for that many people. She
would like to see a need for that much density before they build it. It is a great addition to our
community, but how dense do we want to get? She doesn’t see the need right now.
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson Council Member Benfield
Council Member Sutherland Council Member Mann
Council Member Egbert
The motion carried.
Council Member Stout returned to the Dais.
B. 8:00 P.M. Consideration of the proposed Appropriation 2011 Budget – Richard Horner
(BILL 1050 Appropriation 2011 Budget)
Finance Officer Horner reviewed the listing of the budget totaling $51,000,000. Ordinance 1050
authorizes the 2011 Budget. The budget is up about $5,000,000 due to construction projects including water and sewer upgrade projects. He reviewed the “Budget Highlights” and the
“Statement of Understanding” as noted below:
City of Rexburg For the 2011 Budget (Year Ending 9/30/11)
STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDINGS ON BUDGET MANAGEMENT
1) The Council will review the General Fund Contingency Balance at the end of the year to decide
if any could be applied to the Police Impact Fee Fund deficit.
8
2) Expenditures, including all capital items, will be managed so that short falls in total revenues are
offset by cutbacks in expenditures in the General and Street Funds.
3) $350,000 of street funding is remaining in the Downtown Revitalization Fund to be later
decided upon as to its application.
4) All construction projects over $25,000 and their related operating and maintenance costs will be
reviewed and approved by the City Council before any funds will be committed to the project.
5) All capital purchases of $5000 or more shall be delayed until February 1, 2011, unless special
permission is granted by the Mayor. The Mayor will then notify the City Council of any exceptions.
6) All hiring of employees to fill a previously existing position that was vacated must have approval from the City Council.
7) All volunteer committees will be notified of these policies and procedures
BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS
City of Rexburg 2011 Budget
Total Budget: $51,947,200 up $5,344,900 from current 2010 budget of $46,602,300; the increase is
mostly due to construction projects, namely water and sewer upgrades and expansion.
Operating Budget is approximately $19 million of the total.
Street maintenance, repair and construction funding is at $2,576,500, not counting $350,000 of
street funding remaining in the Downtown Revitalization Fund.
Property tax revenues are estimated to increase about $176,100, mostly due to new construction.
The City property tax levy rate is near a seven year low at $346 per $100,000 of taxable value,
which is the lowest in the last 20 years or more, except for 2001.
No new full-time personnel positions are scheduled to be funded this budget year.
A new fund was created for funding of the new operating costs of the Riverside Aquatic Center in
the amount of $402,900, including a contingency of $127,100 to offset variations in budgeted
revenues and expenses.
Increases in utility rates will be about 5.2% for the average homeowner, or about $4.17 per month.
Major utility construction projects includes a new water well and tank of $2,500,000, additions to
the wastewater treatment plant to eliminate odors and add new capacity of $6,000,000, and
extensions of water and sewer lines to outlying areas of the city of $3,000,000. New capacity will
be funded by fees charged to new development. Plant upgrades will be funded by user fees.
This budget includes the Riverside Park Construction Fund of $5,250,000 for the purpose of
constructing the Riverside Aquatic Center, which will be reimbursed by the Urban Renewal
Agency of the City of Rexburg.
This budget includes the Madison Fire Protection District budget of $1,127,700, which includes
the construction of a fire station in Sugar City in the amount of $680,000.
This budget includes the Community Safety Lighting Fund of $293,500, of which $230,500 is
available for street lighting construction projects, with the remainder budgeted for street light
maintenance. This budget includes the Community Safety Lighting Fund of $293,500, of which
$230,500 is available for street lighting construction projects, with the remainder budgeted for
street light maintenance.
Published
GENERAL FUND 7,259,300 STREET FUND 2,245,100
RECREATION FUND 250,100 TABERNACLE OPERATIONS FUND 155,700
REXBURG TABERNACLE ORCHESTRA FUND 20,500 POLICE IMPACT FEE CAPITAL FUND 50,000
D.A.R.E. ASSOCIATION FUND 17,100 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 30,600
POLICE SMALL GRANTS FUND 36,700 ANIMAL CONTROL FUND 76,100
EMERGENCY SERVICES FUND 1,939,100 JOINT FIRE EQUIPMENT FUND 280,600
MADISON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 1,127,700 FIRE IMPACT FEE CAPITAL FUND 30,000
ESD PAID CALL FUND 40,600 REVOLVING LOAN FUND 97,000
9
RIVERSIDE AQUATIC CENTER 402,900
LEGACY FLIGHT MUSEUM 147,600
UTILITY FUND 8,023,800
BUILDING SAFETY & P&Z 779,900
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 362,500
DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION FUND 350,000
BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE FUND 35,000
STREET IMPACT FEE FUND 200,000
WATER CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 1,826,300
SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 2,933,700
ARTS PROMULGATION FUND 277,400
ESD PARAMEDIC CARE UNIT FUND 200,000
PARKS IMPACT FEE CAPITAL FUND 108,000
TRAILS OF MADISON COUNTY FUND 97,400
ROMANCE THEATRE FUND 292,500
RIVERSIDE PARK CONST. FUND 5,250,000
SOUTH WATER TANK & WELL 2,500,000
STREET REPAIR CONTRACTS FUND 400,000
STREET NEW CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,510,700
MAYOR'S YOUTH COMMITTEE 7,700
SEWER/WATER LINE EXT/REPLCMNT 3,000,000
AIRPORT OPERATIONS FUND 172,200
GOLF COURSE FUND 477,200
GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION FUND 60,000
SEWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION FUND 6,000,000
LID CONSTRUCTION FUNDS 500,000
LID DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 992,500
FARMERS MARKET FUND 15,400
REXBURG ARTS COUNCIL FUND 28,800
COMMUNITY SAFETY LIGHTING FUND 293,500
VETERAN'S MEMORIAL TRUST FUND 27,000
ARCHER EMPLOYEE TRUST FUND 10,000
ESD PIPES & DRUMS TRUST FUND 9,000 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSE: 51,947,200
Council Member Erickson said two different construction projects have increased the budget by
$11,000,000. The net budget is down $6,000,000 from last year except for the Riverside Park
Project and the Wastewater Plant upgrade. Finance Officer Horner said of the $402,000 budgeted
for the Riverside Aquatic Facility; $127,000 will come out of the reserve fund. $275,000 is planned
to run the facility. The proposed Revenue Schedule C was reviewed. Finance Officer Horner said
he has added to $99,000 to Revenue Schedule C as a one-time transfer of revenues from the
Riverside Park Construction Fund that can be held in reserve. Because this is the first year, they
do not know exactly how things will turn out. These funds will give them a buffer. Council
Member Erickson asked about the added employee to manage the park. The objective is to have
Riverside Park pay its own way without subsidy. $275,000 is the reserved portion of that budget,
so it is not spent unless it has to be. Council Member Erickson feels they did a good job setting it
up that way. He does not want the operating manager to be told they have $400,000 to run the
facility; he wants them to know they have $275,000 to raise in funds.
There is a 5.2% increase in utility rates based on the average home usage of 10,000 gallons per
month. For homes with less than four or five people it would be less. The increase covers costs
for water, sewage, and garbage. Garbage rates did not increase at all, but sewage increased 8% and
water increased 6%. The 5.2% is an average increase for an average home. Council Member
Erickson asked when the sewage was increased last. It was increased last year, but had not been
increased for a few years prior. He said smaller annual increases are better than larger increase
every few years. Finance Officer Horner responded the sewer upgrade to get rid of the smell was
the reason for the increase last year. This year the proposed increase is to cover inflation on
regular costs like power rate increases. Council Member Benfield said one older constituent does
not come near the minimum usage for water or wastewater. What can we do to help people in
that situation? Richard Horner said the minimum usage increase will be close to $0.53. The
sewage minimum increased about $0.08, so for one person it might be a $0.67 increase per month.
There is some help available through the county for indigent care and to supplement utilities.
For construction projects, there is a new water tank and well at $2.5 million in the budget and $6
million in water and sewer projects. The $5 million that will be reimbursed from the Urban
10
Renewal Agency for the Riverside Aquatic Facility will go towards some of these construction
projects. The Fire District budget increased because of the new station being built in Sugar City,
budgeted at $680,000. The new station construction costs will not come from city funds;
however, because the city manages the station it must be recorded in the budget. There is
$230,000 in the community lighting fund for use in the community. Plans need to be made by
winter 2011. Finance Officer Horner stated the budget is very similar to what they had last year.
The Police Impact Fee includes the animal shelter. There still remains $350,000 in the Downtown
Revitalization fund. Any construction projects over $25,000 must come to City Council for
approval.
Council Member Mann asked if all of the approved requisitions are included in the budget
including police cars, etc. Purchases under $5,000 can be approved by the mayor. Council
Member Stout asked to notify the City Council if there are large purchases up to the $5,000.
Council Member Erickson asked to notify the Committee Chairmen of the purchasing restrictions
until February, 2011. Finance Officer Horner will make that notification by letter under the
mayor’s signature. Employee hiring’s will come to the City Council for approval. All of these
extra measures will help ensure that we stay on-track with the budget. The cash is up to the good
about $40,000 over budget at this point. Council Member Erickson explained the city is in better
shape than other cities.
Mayor Woodland opened the public hearing:
Those in favor: NONE
Those Neutral:
Lynn Betts at 66 North 1st East asked about the new aquatic person. It is stated no new
personnel. It was explained that this is a part time position. They will change the wording.
Council Member Stout asked to add the wording for “any new positions” to the document.
Those opposed: NONE
Mayor Woodland closed the public hearing.
Council Member Mann moved to recommend approval of the budget; Council Member
Benfield seconded the motion;
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
C. 8:15 P.M. Consideration of proposed fee increases to be effective October 1,
2010, for Water, Wastewater, and Garbage; Resolution 2010 – 10: Richard Horner
Finance Officer Horner reviewed the proposed fee increases. Increases in utility rates will be
about 5.2% for the average homeowner, or about $4.17 per month. Water and Wastewater took
an increase to the following:
Proposed New Monthly Cost:
Water Base Fee for .75” Equivalent Meter $15.62 up .64 cents.
Usage Fee per 1,000 Gallons over 6,000 $ 0.803
Wastewater Fee for .75” Equivalent Meter : $12.34
Usage Fee per 1,000 Gallons $ 3.19
Other City Usage Fee per 1,000 Gallon $ 2.08
Out of City Limits Add 30% to each service
11
Some of the Wastewater Plant upgrade is funded with current funds in the wastewater account.
Council Member Benfield asked if the increase could be held to 4%. It would not pay all of the
bills, including power charges. Council Member Mann asked if the minimum could be subsidized.
Some larger homes use a lot more water. Is it possible to charge different rates depending on
usage? Finance Officer Horner said it is already subsidized. The average home pays the same
base fee of $15.62, but the first 6,000 gallons is free. The same rate is charged for those who use
20,000 and those who use 60,000. Council Member Mann asked for a rate to encourage water
conservation and for relief in costs for those who are far under average usage.
Council Member Erickson said it already is high for billings in May and June. Raising the rates
may not conserve water. Lower rates would encourage greener yards. Council Member Mann
asked for conservation measures including rain meters for sprinkling systems. Finance Officer
Horner said the city used to have a declining rate structure. Council Member Sutherland said it is
a little late for rate changes for this fiscal year, but it should be discussed for next year. Mayor
Woodland said the city could explore other cities and their solutions to conservation.
Mayor Woodland opened the public hearing:
Those in favor of the proposal: NONE
Those Neutral to the proposal: NONE
Those opposed to the proposal: NONE
Cheryl Graham was concerned with the increase last year and she asked if new water vehicles
could be purchased out of the general fund. Finance Officer Horner explained code requires the
vehicles to be purchased out of the water fund. Council Member Erickson said it could be done
by having a city motor pool. He reviewed the Cedar City motor pool as an example. If a water
employee needs a truck, he would have to check it out of the motor pool. A record would be kept
and the water department would be charged for using the truck that day. A motor pool would
make the departments more accountable for what they use. Finance Officer Horner said a motor
pool is typically used in larger cities where more vehicles are needed. Larger cities would have
enough savings to afford the overhead costs for tracking it. The city would have to hire someone
to check it out, sign it, bill it out, etc. Council Member Erickson said it would be very expensive
to get started; however, it would save money in the long term. The university has a motor pool
system set up for accountability purposes. Finance Officer Horner said he is hoping the allocation
of funds now is very close to what it would be if the city had a similar system in place. Council
Member Erickson said a motor pool is something the city might want to look into implementing.
Paul Skolls at 1118 Coyote Willow Way is opposed to the increase. He said people’s incomes are
not expected to go up in this economy. Families have expenses like gas, food costs, etc to fit in
their budgets. The increase may only be $5 per person each month, but for a family budget it will
add $70.00 to $100.00 a year that families will have to struggle to pay. Inflation is a factor;
however, businesses always seem to make their bottom line. He wanted more creativity to keep
costs down by not buying trucks, etc. His second concern was the flat rate utility charges to
families, regardless of usage. His comments are not meant to be a criticism to the city. Rexburg is
a wonderful and beautiful place to live; however, families are struggling right now. There needs to
be more thought put into the solution than just increasing rates to cover expenses. He realizes
there may be details he is not aware of, but consider the sewage smell as an example. He thought
maybe we could live with the smell for a while because we are having trouble. A motor pool was
an example. He asked to look forward and be good stewards of the people’s money.
Mayor Woodland said the city has curtailed expenses. No city employees took cost of living
increases this last year. The city has lost 6 or 7 people to attrition and those people have not been
replaced. The city curtailed the purchase of several vehicles they all wanted, but did not get. The
city’s gasoline costs do go up; electrical costs do go up. The sewage smell needed to be taken care
of or the city might face a lawsuit. We do work very hard to keep costs low. The city’s sewer rates
are quite low compared to other cities.
Council Member Sutherland said an enterprise fund requires a balanced budget. All of the
funds have to be covered. One of the biggest problems the city has right now is the increase in
electrical fees. The pump systems are all electrical. The sewer system has a lot of electrical
12
powered lift stations. The city gets stuck between a rock and a hard place. He does agree the
costs are going up and it would be nice to hold the line, but the city is required by state statute to
balance those costs. They do have a freeze on major purchasing until the revenue allocations are
known in 2011. If the funds are not there, there will not be purchases, period. All of the
comments are correct and good; however, the city is bound by statute.
Cheryl Graham asked for line by line cuts. Council Member Egbert responded the city did cut as
requested in earlier budget meetings to get to this point. They are all on the same page trying to
cut spending and preserve funds. The city has to keep equipment maintained as the city grows.
Mayor Woodland explained some of the reasons for increased benefits; health care costs have
gone up this year. City employees have taken a cut in health care and their contribution is larger as
well. The city is working very hard to make it right.
Lynn Betts does not think growth brings more costs because new residents are paying their
monthly fees as well. Mayor Woodland responded with growth comes an increase in services. Mr.
Betts asked how apartment’s billings are calculated. Finance Officer Horner explained the fee
calculations. Apartments may have multiple meters, but they are billed the same rate per gallon
just like everybody else.
Those in favor: NONE
Those neutral: NONE
Council Member Mann moved to approve Resolution 2010 - 10 for fee increases to be effective
October 1, 2010, for Water, and Wastewater; Council Member Stout seconded the motion;
Discussion: Council Member Stout referred to EPA fines for the water system exceeding the
allowed pollutant limits. Council Member Mann said Mayor Woodland was watching the money
very closely.
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
Items for Consideration:
A. Request to vacate property:
1. Adjacent to the railroad tracks on University Blvd and South Yellowstone Hwy – Staff
Public Works Director Millar reviewed the proposal to vacate a portion of street right-of-way at the intersection of South Yellowstone Hwy and University Blvd. The city does not have any
future use for this portion of the right-of-way outside the street’s required width. It is about 5,000
13
square feet. The agreement with the adjoining property owner is that if the land is vacated to him,
he would landscape and maintain it.
Council Member Egbert moved to set a public hearing to vacate said property; Council Member
Sutherland seconded; all voted aye. The motion carried.
2. Christensen Auto Body property adjacent to the Roundabout on 4th South – Staff
Public Works Director Millar reviewed the request. The portion of the right-of-way adjacent to the roundabout that is owned by the city has been maintained by Christensen Auto Body. Council
Member Erickson was concerned with loss of valuable right-of-way. Community Development Director Christensen explained CBC Zoning has a setback of 10 feet.
Council Member Mann appreciated the improvements to the property made by a private business.
The sidewalk, curbing, and landscaping did not use any city funds.
Council Member Erickson moved to have a public hearing; Council Member Stout seconded the motion;
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
B. Conditional Use Permit to increase the density in Mixed Use Two (MU2) from 30 units per acre to 40 units per acre and decrease the commercial component to zero percent. The property
is located at 275 & 325 North 1st East – Steve Kelly
14
Steve Kelly from Orem Utah asked to discuss the proposal to add density to the property at 275 &
325 North 1st East. He reviewed the proposal on the overhead screen. The zoning was recently
changed from Light Industrial/Professional Office to Mixed Use 2. The Development Code allows
residential density to increase to 40 units per acre, as well as 0% commercial, with a Conditional Use
Permit. The architectural design was reviewed on the overhead screen with 100% apartments
without any commercial development on the ground floor.
The site plan was presented. They are planning two identical buildings with one bedroom
apartments. Mr. Kelly said there is a shortage of one-bedroom apartments that are within walking
distance to the University for young married students. The site is conveniently located close to
existing commercial development as well. Each building will have 62 one-bedroom and 27 two-
bedroom apartments. 294 parking stalls are required for this complex. There will be 202 standard
stalls and 26 compact stalls on the surface and 66 underground stalls. Two accesses are planned on
1st East. The parking requirements will control the units per acre.
Council Member Egbert reviewed the easement requirements as discussed in the previous City
Council meeting. He asked why the commercial portion was eliminated. The request for no
commercial space will be addressed later in the presentation.
Council Member Stout asked about the joint use parking clause. It would be an idea to seek a joint
use parking agreement with adjoining commercial development if possible to meet the parking
requirement. There would be 124 one-bedroom units at 584 square feet each and 54 two-bedroom
units at 767 square feet. The increased density proposed is about 30% due primarily to changing the
apartment configurations from 1-3 bedroom apartments to 1-2 bedroom apartments while increasing
the number of 1-2 bedroom apartments. The second bedroom adds $900 additional revenue per
year. The extra density makes the project viable.
Council Member Erickson asked about storm drainage. The storm water will be contained with
French drains.
Steve Kelly indicated the commercial part of the project was deleted because similar complexes with
the commercial component are not successful. He referenced single student complexes with
commercial on the main floor at UVU, (Utah Valley University). Much of the commercial space is
vacant except “$5.00 Pizza” and a “comedy club”. Another complex by BYU Provo on a street with
27,000 cars per day has the entire bottom commercial floor vacant. He did not think the
commercial space on 1st East project would rent out at the present time. Landscaping and parking
requirements will control the density of this project.
Council Member Egbert asked if they have done any studies in deciding so quickly to drop the
commercial component. Steve Kelly responded that the Mix Use component was all that was
available on the initial proposal. He did not necessarily think the commercial component would
work out, however, he knew it was a requirement. Mixed Use 2 gives the option to drop the
commercial component with a CUP (Conditional Use Permit).
Council Member Stout asked about the vacancy rates with the referenced residential space of the
mixed use complexes in Utah. Mr. Kelly did not know the exact numbers on vacancy rates;
however, they are so close to college campuses they do seem to be filled. Both of the examples
given are single student housing complexes, which would seem to attract more business considering
the increased social activity among single students.
15
Council Member Mann asked about receiving public input even though it is not required to have a
second public hearing. Council Member Benfield commented the plans look beautiful and asked if
they have any plans to purchase adjoining property and build more. Mr. Kelly responded it is not
economically feasible at this time. The square foot price they are paying for the land is all they can
afford right now.
Cody Howard at 642 Harvest Drive had two concerns. Parking is a concern; underground parking
is a concern due to cost. Elevation is a concern for drainage, etc. The road right-of-way is not
blocked off. He has parking concerns with his business too. Snow removal is an issue for parking
too. Garbage removal is a concern; dumpsters will have to be situated somewhere on the property.
The green area does take into account all of the road right-of-way. The canal company has right-of-
way for consideration. The site was a dumping area for the old Spori building that was removed
from campus. He needs be sure the soil samples to make sure the ground is stable. As long as his
road right-of-way is not affected, he does not have a problem with Mr. Kelly building this project.
Council Member Egbert asked about the entry into the development; if it is a problem if the
apartment cars are not parking in his right-of-way.
Cody Howard said that area is used for access. There are times when big trucks come in and turn
around and might block the cars when making deliveries. It is not a problem if the apartment cars
do not park there. Definite distinction needs to be made for residents so they know where they are
allowed to park. He has no problem with the development if his concerns are addressed.
Attorney Phil Packer said the University would be concerned with this development in the PEZ
zone. Mayor Woodland said it would be difficult to require the commercial component if it would
not fill up with businesses. Community Development Director Christensen responded indicating
Planning and Zoning did not feel it was viable to have commercial at this time in this development
in this area.
Council Member Mann was in favor of this higher density in this area. He hopes students will
walk to the University.
Council Member Erickson asked if the commercial component is dropped, is the setback
different. Community Development Director Christensen responded the MU2 Land Use was
extended into this area of 1st East because MU2 is more flexible than Downtown Commercial.
Council Member Erickson asked again if MU2, with only residential, would have a different setback.
Mr. Christensen said no, the PEZ Zone would require a 10 foot setback. Council Member Erickson
asked about buffering the canal and the property zoned Light Industrial. Mr. Christensen responded
the ordinance does not require it; however, for this project adequate buffering with adjoining
properties is required per the Planning and Zoning’s recommendation No. 11, which included
landscaping, canal, trash, etc. Val Christensen discussed with Mr. Kelly during the Planning &
Zoning public hearing that the land uses in this area are not greatly compatible. That is why a
condition was put on Mr. Kelly to buffer all surrounding edges. These issues will be discussed more
at the time of development.
Planning and Zoning Public Hearing on July 15, 2010
Conditional Use Permit – Steve Kelly Proposed Conditions of Approval 1. Trash dumpsters/receptacles shall be located within the interior (behind front building line,
but in required setbacks) of the lot and shall be enclosed. 2. A site plan reflecting all conditions of approval and incorporating all City standards, e.g. landscaping, parking, snow storage, drainage, etc. shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. Lighting shall be low (under 15-feet in height) and not create glare, and as a minimum shall
adhere to the City’s lighting ordinance. 4. Storm drainage and other Engineering considerations to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 5. Applicant to demonstrate that adequate parking is provided and buffered from the street.
This includes having landscape buffers of at least 10 feet from public ways. The current site
plan does not meet the requirements of the Development Code. 6. Staff recommends that as part of the CUP the Planning and Zoning Commission review conformance to the Design Standards as found in the Development Code. The proposal is the first one applied for under the new MU2 requirements.
7. Provide adequate buffering of subject property from all adjacent developed parcels.
16
8. Have an agreement with Rexburg Canal Company addressing set-backs, access, and
landscaping along the canal.
9. Preserve and protect recorded easement; any improvement or development of the easement shall be in agreement with the property owners served by said easement. 10. There shall not be any grade changes that would adversely affect adjacent property owners.
11. The final site plan and elevations shall be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Mayor Woodland stated there is protection for neighbors in the plans; there are not any changes
that would adversely affect them.
Council Member Mann wanted to acknowledge a letter from Dennis Ficksted at 55 East 2nd
North, a neighboring property owner. He wanted to state is disapproval of the increase in density.
Council Member Erickson reiterated that Planning & Zoning had no problem with City Council
approving this CUP with the conditions they set in place. He moved to approve the CUP subject to
Planning & Zoning’s conditions; Council Member Sutherland seconded the motion; Discussion; the
motion was stated to include staff conditions as well.
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
C. Sewer hookups for eight (8) existing homes in the area of 300 West 1st South – Staff
Public Works Director Millar reviewed the locations that are not connected to the city sewer lines.
No. 7 below requested a connection paid for in 1975; however, they were never connected. If the
line is within 300 feet, the connection is required. They have been paying sewer bills for 35 years
without the connection. The residents discovered they were not connected to the sewage lines when
their septic tank filled up. There are 8 locations that are all in the same situation; two businesses,
and six residences. The residents on 1st West are insistent that the city should pay to have them
hooked up to the sewage system. They could be required to connect to the city’s system. He asked
the City Council for direction.
The locations include:
1. 247 North 1st East 2. 247 East 2nd North
3. 257 East 2nd North 4. 115 North 2nd West
5. 239 West 3rd North 6. 221 West 3rd North
7. 365 West 1st South 8. 211 West 3rd South
Council Member Mann said they should be connected. He would support the Mayor and Staff’s
decision. Council Member Benfield and Sutherland would support the connections as negotiated by
the Mayor and Staff.
Council Member Sutherland moved to require connections with the Mayor and Staff having the
latitude to make the arrangements. Council Member Benfield seconded the motion.
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
17
The motion carried.
Staff Reports:
B. Public Works: – John Millar
1. Riverside Park Project is under construction with bids coming forward for concrete, etc.
Public Works Director Millar shared a handout of pictures of the fill area prepared by
Johnny Watson. A schedule is prepared for bids opening in the next month. August 4th is the
bid opening for the structural concrete. Most of the site is down to grade. It is moving along
well. The sewer line will be installed tomorrow.
2. 12th West excavation material is being moved to use as fill for the city’s portion of the project.
Council Member Sutherland pointed out how quickly the green space areas have been
leveled out by the city. This city has been moving fill from the 12th West excavation, outside
of what Johnny Watson’s team is doing, in preparation for a bid that opens Friday. The bid
will include the final grading, the top soil, the sprinkler system and seeding all the area outside
of the pool site.
Additional parking has been added to help with the ball field venues. Council Member
Erickson asked if the drawings represent the actual amount of space available for parking.
There was discussion on availability of parking when multiple events will be happening at the
same time in the park, as well as the need for pool parking.
3. 12th West Project widening is 60-70% complete. The state portion is in the bid bond process.
It will open to contractors as a Public Works project. If the lowest bidder does not accept the
project, they must be willing to sacrifice 5% of their bid to cover the costs for the next highest
bidder. The city is pushing the project as fast as possible.
4. 7th South signal is installed and working. 2nd East extension to the south of the light will be
under construction next week.
5. 2nd South Hemming Street project will start next Monday. The contract is with Jerome
Bowen. The project needs to be completed during the 7-week break. Council Member
Benfield asked about parking. The parking component has room to go either way (regular or
reverse angle). Public Works Director Millar will provide the City Council with reverse angle
statistics at the next meeting.
6. Wastewater bio-tower is starting next week. The bond hearing for judicial review is scheduled.
C. Finance Department: – Richard Horner
1. Resolution 2010 – 11 Adopt updated Health Reimbursement Arrangement Plan
Finance Officer Horner reviewed Resolution 2010 – 11 for the HRA Plan. It brings the Plan up
to federal requirements. It does not cost any more money than before.
Council Member Mann moved to adopt Resolution 2010 – 11 Health Reimbursement Plan;
Council Member Erickson seconded the motion;
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
18
RESOLUTION ADOPTING CITY OF REXBURG’S HRA PLAN
Resolution 2010 – 11
The undersigned Principal of City of Rexburg (the Employer) hereby certifies that the
following resolutions were duly adopted by the board on July 21, 2010, and that such resolutions have not been modified or rescinded as of the date hereof:
RESOLVED, that the Health Reimbursement Arrangement effective January 1, 2010,
presented to this meeting is hereby approved and adopted and that the proper officers of
the Employer are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the
Administrator of the Plan one or more counterparts of the Plan.
RESOLVED, that the Administrator shall be instructed to take such actions that are
deemed necessary and proper in order to implement the Plan, and to set up adequate
accounting and administrative procedures to provide benefits under the Plan.
RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Employer shall act as soon as possible to
notify the employees of the Employer of the adoption of the Health Reimbursement
Arrangement Plan by delivering to each employee a copy of the summary description of
the Plan in the form of the Summary Plan Description presented to the meeting, which
form is hereby approved.
The undersigned further certifies that attached hereto is a true copy of the Health
Reimbursement Arrangement and the Summary Plan Description approved and adopted
in the foregoing resolutions.
NOW THEREFORE, the City of Rexburg does hereby accept and adopt the Health
Reimbursement Arrangement and the Summary Plan Description effective January 1,
2010.
RESOLVED this 21st day of July, 2010 by the City Council, City of Rexburg, Idaho.
________________________________
SIGNED BY: Richard S. Woodland
Mayor
________________________________
ATTEST: Blair D. Kay
City Clerk
19
20
Finance Officer Horner reviewed the quarterly expenditure verses budget report. The year is
75% complete. The operating funds have been expended to 67% of budget. He reviewed the
Expenditure Report by fund.
Council President Mann asked if the expended portion is so low because the ball park fees have
not been paid yet. Park activities occur during the last three months of the budget year; they will
be reported on at the end. Street repair contracts are exceeding the allotted budget. City Council
will have to decide in January where they want the funds to be dispersed and which projects to
complete.
The next report is a forecast of expenditures. It is published quarterly in the newspaper. This
report includes a breakdown of wages and capital. Council Member Benfield asked if these
reports are published on the website. They will be published online when they are approved.
Council President Mann moved to accept the Treasurer’s Expenditure Report by fund and the
Budget Summary Report; Council Member Egbert seconded the motion;
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
Calendared Bills and Tabled Items:
21
A. BILL Introductions: - NONE
B. First Reading: Those items which are being introduced for first reading.
1. BILL 1049 to rezone Kartchner Homes from LDR2 to LDR3
Council Member Erickson moved to approve BILL 1049 to rezone Kartchner Homes from
LDR2 to LDR3; Council Member Sutherland seconded; all voted aye, the motion carried.
Council Member Stout did not vote.
2. BILL 1050 Appropriation 2011 Budget
Council Member Sutherland moved to first read BILL 1050 Appropriation 2011 Budget;
Council Member Egbert seconded the motion; all voted aye. The motion carried.
C. Second Reading: Those items which have been first read. – NONE
D. Third Reading: Those items which have been second read – NONE
Tabled Items: Those items which have been the subject of an affirmative vote to a motion to table: -
NONE
Mayor’s Report:
Consent Calendar: The consent calendar includes items which require formal City Council
action, however they are typically routine or not of great controversy. Individual Council
members may ask that any specific item be removed from the consent calendar for discussion in
greater detail. Explanatory information is included in the City Council’s agenda packet regarding
these items.
A. Minutes: July 07, 2010 B. Approve the City of Rexburg Bills
Council Member Mann moved to approve the Consent Calendar, the minutes, and the city bills;
Council Member Sutherland seconded the motion;
Those voting aye Those voting nay
Council Member Erickson None
Council Member Sutherland
Council Member Egbert
Council Member Mann
Council Member Benfield
Council Member Stout
The motion carried.
Adjournment
__________________________________ Attest: Richard Woodland, Mayor
________________________________ Blair D. Kay, City Clerk