The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutALL DOCS - 01-00030 - Dr Grant Davis Medical Office - New BuildingCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Rexburg Department of Building Inspection Building Permit No. R - of - o9 -of Building Street Address: 3o Madison Professional Park (Address Correction) Building Owner: Dr. Grant Davis Contractor: Vince Whitehead Description of building or portion of building for which this certificate is issued: Occupancy: Date: May 8, 2002 C.O. Issued by: Buildi Official Office Building FULL This Certificate, issueb ursuant to the requirements of Section 109 of the Uniform Bui(aing Cobe, certifies that, at the time of issuance, this bui1aing or that portion of the hulloing that was inspected on tbe bate fisted was f ouna to be in compliance with tbe requirements of tbe cone for the group and bivision of occupancy and tbe use for wbicb the proposeb occupancy was cfassi f ieb. There shall be no future change in t e exis . . g occupancy classification of the building nor shall any structural changes, modifications • additions be made to the building or any portion thereof until the Building Official has reviewed and approved said future changes. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Rexburg Department of Building Inspection Building Permit No. R- of -o9 -ol Building Street Address: go Madison Professional Plaza Building Owner: Dr. Grant Davis Contractor: Vince Whitehead Description of building or portion of building for which this certificate is issued: Occupancy: Full This Certificate, issued a rsuant to tbe requirements of Section 1o9 of the Uniform Builbing Cobe,.certifies . that, at. te time of issuance,. tbis .buif ?ing.or that rtion of the (Tubing that � f � was inspecteb on the bate tisteb was f ouna to be in compliance with the requirements of the code for tbe group anb bivision of occupancy anb the use for which tbe proposed occupancy was ctassi f ieb. Date: March 1, 2002 C.O. Issued by: Fire Department �i. Bui, ng Official Office Building There shall be no future change in the exis s : occupancy classification of the building nor shall any structural changes, modifications or additions be made to the building or any portion thereof until the Building Officia} has reviewed and approved said future. changes.. Water Department FOOTINGS FOUNDATION BASEMENT FLOORS EXT. WALLS INT. WALLS CEILING ROOF HEAT INSULATED ONCRETE K ASONRY 0 OTHER ,IXCONCRETE alIAASONRY CI OTHER iru No i t liZIAL L • • • • • . z •..4 (1)IWOOD XMASONRy•• 0 CONCRETE rmETA ENEE R •• O STUCCO atWOOD 0 MASONRY CI CONCRETE 0 DRYWALL 0 PLASTER 0 TILE 0 WOOD trgpRYWAU_ 0 PLASTER 0 TILE 0 ACOUSTIC 0 OPEN 0 BUILT UP. COMO° SR. 0 COmp. SH. 0 TILE 0 ROLL ROOF. CI METAL CIRGAS fa o_ 0 COAL 0 FIREPLACE 0 ELECTRIC BUILDING INSPECTOR pertaining ana applicable thereto: I he issuance ot the permit does not waive restrictive covenpnts. REMARKS: PAID SEP 4 2001 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & ZONING VALUE ‘,V t , .■ :4 )• ,— ilu CASH ,0 ' gli CH ullY OF REXBURG ,, , i, APPLICANT i • i I FEE I PAD BUILDING INSPECTOR i , -• i DATE ADDRESS ,•..., BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION REXBURG, ID DATE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. . • OWNER t;"i:fkit JOB ADDRESS 'ilfLEHONE 4 75 C I BUILDER Cr 0,1 ARCHITECT kiCA se" DESIGNER STRUCTURE: ti4NEW 0 REMODEL 0 ADDITION 0 REPAIR 0 RENEWAL 0 FIRE DAMAGE 0 RESIDENCE WOW. 0 EDUCATIONAL 0 GOV'T 0 RELIGIOUS 0 FENCE 0 PATIO 0 CARPORT 0 GARAGE 0 AWNING This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Uniform Building Code and Zoning Regulations of Rexburg, and it is hereby agreed that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specffications will be completed in accordance with the regulations WHIT s Copy CANARY—Building Department's Copy PINK—Assessor's Copy GOLDENROD-Inspector CITY OF REXBURG, IDAHO APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date of Application 8 J / ° J` 0/ Permit No. 1 - o `? OWNER Name a\AS Site Address UBC if 97 Tax Code Building Type v" /v d aC Mailing Address 5(0 WO DfVL City /State/Zip Qe)1c 0 Telephone/Fax/Mobile C t A ) ) (pcj(p - q ( 4 (p (0) 6Q% -c ( (QQ(p (_e(1) 39D CONTRACTOR Name V on 'I P WI rH A,C1 Mailing Address \' J — - -+ City /State/Zip Telephone/Fax/Mobile PROTECT INFORMATION Architect or Engineering Firm y Flo 11 6Aron �I C�r�(1� �Vl ty Ida I.ic.No. Plan Name l 5 kAD ,Sitpdivision ► Lot N . Block t ease att r • • • a • r • . ..sary) (circle one) Residentia ommercia ducational /Govenunent/Religious Description ('Mesa ' OUll() (Examples: New House 1 A ct ion to present houise / c.ornmercial 1 <emoclei) Square feet 4S00 No. of Stories l Height of Building \ 6 + Basement L. finished/ >�znfnishe) Garage sq. feet N& Patio /Carport/Awning N/4 What will Structure be used for (including name of business if applicable): J, C-t DavIS, LA D, (Ear, NIT If used for a multiple family unit please indicate number of units: UN `f VI KO3 Total Estimated Cost lit Ail Q ', • 0 Will dwelling be in a flood plain? n(O Signature of applicant ��i _ y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Zone 5(l`)(13.1 Building Permit Fee $26 7Y,. Q0 Plumbing Permit Fee 9e,a3 Digging Permit Fees Linear Foot Charge Water & Sewer Fees Ocf:2 Plan Check Fens r °? 67, e 2.0 4/1,943. e0 Signature of Inspector PAID SEP 4 Ze `l' CITY OF REXBU 4� Rough Plumbing 1 Septic Tank Fixtures Water Piping Complete 2 Sewer Bath Tubs Urinal Showers Sink Trap Laundry Trays Water Heater Wash Basin fc Other Toilet Slop Sinks .. Kitchen Sinks Floor Drain .t. i`'31 t Drinking Fountains Lawn Sprinklers Water Softeners Dish Washing Mach. Clothes Washer CITY OF REXBURG APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT t _ OWNER FEES Name Plumbing Permit $ Address TeL t "�f' '4x Sewer Inspection $ 4 Lot Blk. Address PLUMBER Name / lifo+t >� ` ( H TeL NATURE OF INSTALLATION Use DESCRIPTION OF WORK Add. Inspection of Pipe $ Inspection of Fixtures $ $ TOTAL $ Received: Date t "'rf ( / "" Rough Plumbing Sewer Other Finish Plumbing By , f f, . r t S INSPECTOR'S RECORD N !NSF! NAME Excavation & Earthwork: Zo l JNOI Concrete: Masonry: E'G" Roofing: Ra tiro,' Insulation: fiferli S Drywall: Painting: Floor Coverings: . /.0 — Na AiYA4a Plumbing: Heating: Electrical: Cabinets: C- 17)k SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER) Roof Trusses: Q4/4 c Floor / Ceiling Joists: v t J -/ frm / rn Siding /.Exterior Trim: P /C SUBCONTRACTOR LIST Dated this 21" day of August, 2001. Approved by REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL BUILDING PERMIT FOR PARTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO: Building Official for the City of Rexburg Pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Building Code, the undersigned requests that a building permit be issued for: Permit for footings and foundation only on medical building. Acknowledgment is made that the plans for the complex are not complete and that final approval of the building will not be given until the final plans have been approved. We recognize that proceeding with partial construction at this time is entirely at the risk of the Architect/Owner with there being no assurance that the final Certificate of Occupancy for the entire building or structure will be granted. We further absolve the City of Rexburg and officers and employees thereof, of all responsibility for the issuance of a partial permit and further agree that any work performed under this permit will be removed or otherwise corrected to be in accord with the requirements of the final approved plans when a permit for the entire building or structure is finally granted. PLANNING & ZONING August 8, 2001 7:00 p.m. Chairman: Davawn Beattie Members: Ted Whyte Glenn Walker Winston Dyer Bobbette Carlson Robert Schwartz Ladawn Bratsman Doug Smith City Clerk: Marilyn Hansen P.F.C.: John Millar City Attorney: Stephen Zollinger Motion was made by Bobbette to approve the minutes of July 25, seconded by Ladawn. All voted aye, none opposed. Discussion of the McDonald's sign and the Erickson Pontiac sign. Cory Newman - Site Plan Approval for Apartments at 37 So. 4 West John Millar reviewed the plans which had been presented for approval. The property is across from the canal with a current zone of MDR. There is an existing house on the front of the lot, the plan is to build a 4 -plex behind, it meets the setback requirements, there are 8 parking stalls meeting the requirements. On the rear yard and on the south side yard the asphalt is shown going right to the property line. It needs to be discussed if this should be a buffer, fence or both. Cory explained he is building married student apartments, the first building in front will be a duplex with 12 parking spots, the manager will live upstairs with the 2 parallel parking spots, 3 gentlemen will live down the basement with use of the parking behind the 4 -plex in back. Discussion on the drainage going north on 4t West and a fence. The plans need Fire Department approval, it is a situation where they have to back out and one lot deeper would definitely need a turn around big enough for a fire truck. Dick made a motion to approve the site plan subject to approval of the Fire Department, subject to acceptable drainage worked out with the City Engineering Department, a fence on the south side and a 5' buffer or fence on the east side. Motion was seconded by Doug, all voted aye, none opposed. 1 Gene Palmer - Final Plat Review for Hidden Valley Estates Phase III and Preliminary Plat Review for Phase IV One issue before the Board is the final plat on Hidden Valley Estates Phase III which consists of 16 lots which are basically west of Phases I and II. There are some review items but will be followed through by the City and the in -depth mathematical review by the County. On the preliminary plat review on Phase IV, they have basically added 4 lots to the south end of Phase II which extends the existing road for two more lots. Gene explained the purpose for Phase IV is to comply with commitments to different people in the subdivision. Discussion of the access, a 40' greenbelt and a 10' walkway around the cul de sac into the proposed city park, and extension of the street. Phase III has a few alterations between Lot 1 Block 2 and Lot 1 Block 1 taking some footage away from Block 1 and giving it to the corner on Block 2. The water and sewer are in and being tested now, as has been their practice the curb and gutter is in but they will forego the paving until next spring. The master plan for everything below the Woodmansee- Johnson canal is complete and another plan is being drawn for the project on the other side of the canal. Discussion on the streets. John reported that Phase III and IV have been reviewed and there are no real problems. It is requested that no new phases be approved until there is a new overall master plan. The new plan needs to come back before the Board for review. Gene reported this master plan should be presented within two weeks. Dick declared a conflict of interest. Ted made a motion to approve the final plat on Phase III subject to City Engineering review. Motion was seconded by Bobbette, all voted aye, none opposed. Dick abstained Ted made a motion to approve the preliminary plat with changes to Lot 1 Block 2 being drawn in properly. Motion was seconded by Glenn, all voted aye, none opposed. Dick abstained. Plot Plan Review for Dr. Grant Davis John Millar reported that this is a development of a lot in the southwest corner of Madison Professional Park located on the south end of Ash. The south line is adjoining the Rosewood Addition. The only problem with the setbacks is the issue of the south and west edge of that property which will require buffering with either a fence and/or buffering. The other problem is an engineering issue, they would like to find a better way for the sewer than to go 250' across the parking lot. Stan Palmer, architect for Dr. Davis, discussed the location of the sewer. He presented an updated copy of the plan, there is an existing sewer manhole which he was not aware of approximately 40' from the existing asphalt edge of the property. This is a sloping site, with the 2 setbacks, to get enough parking for the requirements of the City they have to have a small parking lot along the south side. There is approximately 5000 sq. ft. of finished space in the building. Discussion of buffers, traffic, parking requirement of 25 stalls, the location of the dumpsters and the need for addresses on Ash Street rather than Madison Professional Park. Dick made a motion to approve the plan subject to a fence on the south and a buffer on the west and appropriate City Department approvals. Bobbette seconded the motion, all voted aye, none opposed. For information only, Ted discussed a proposed project for student housing located on property on 2" East next to the armory. 3 a. Lot Filled out by: la. SUBDIVISON a. Block 1 b. Lot lb. CITY BLOCK 2. ASSIGNED ADDRESS 3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION X32 "4 CITY OF REXBURG ADDRESS FORM (Choose either la or lb) -?. 0 £ Date: - a " met cryN a 7/15/2002 Dr. Grant Davis 30 Madison Professional Park Rexburg, ID 83440 Dear Dr. Davis, It has come to my attention that two items mandated by the Plot Plan Review for your new building in the Madison Professional Park have not been completed. A fence on the South alongthe Rosewood Subdivision and a buffer on the West side of the property are required as per the ruling by the Rexburg Planning and Zoning (P &Z) Committee. I have attached a copy of the minutes of the P &Z meeting to the back of this document. Please finish these two items. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 324. Sincerely, Val Christensen Building Official c.c Matt Babcock John Millar STATE OF IDAHO www.ci.rexburg.id.us P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, ldaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fax (208) 359 -3022 e -mail rexburg @ci.rexburg.id.us Gene Palmer - Final Plat Review for Hidden Valley Estates Phase III and Preliminary Plat Review for Phase IV One issue before the Board is the final plat on Hidden Valley Estates Phase III which consists of 16 lots which are basically west of Phases I and II. There are some review items but will be followed through by the City and the in -depth mathematical review by the County. On the preliminary plat review on Phase IV, they have basically added 4 lots to the south end of Phase II which extends the existing road for two more lots. Gene explained the purpose for Phase IV is to comply with commitments to different people in the subdivision. Discussion of the access, a 40' greenbelt and a 10' walkway around the cul de sac into the proposed city park, and extension of the street. Phase III has a few alterations between Lot 1 Block 2 and Lot 1 Block 1 taking some footage away from Block 1 and giving it to the comer on Block 2. The water and sewer are in and being tested now, as has been their practice the curb and gutter is in but they will forego the paving until next spring. The master plan for everything below the Woodmansee- Johnson canal is complete and another plan is being drawn for the project on the other side of the canal. Discussion on the streets. John reported that Phase III and IV have been reviewed and there are no real problems. It is requested that no new phases be approved until there is a new overall master plan. The new plan needs to come back before the Board for review. Gene reported this master plan should be presented within two weeks. Dick declared a conflict of interest. Ted made a motion to approve the final plat on Phase III subject to City Engineering review. Motion was seconded by Bobbette, all voted aye, none opposed. Dick abstained Ted made a motion to approve the preliminary plat with changes to Lot 1 Block 2 being drawn in properly. Motion was seconded by Glenn, all voted aye, none opposed. Dick abstained. Plot Plan Review for Dr. Grant Davis John Millar reported that this is a development of a lot in the southwest corner of Madison Professional Park located on the south end of Ash. The south line is adjoining the Rosewood Addition. The only problem with the setbacks is the issue of the south and west edge of that property which will require buffering with either a fence and/or buffering. The other problem is an engineering issue, they would like to find a better way for the sewer than to go 250' across the parking lot. Stan Palmer, architect for Dr. Davis, discussed the location of the sewer. He presented an updated copy of the plan, there is an existing sewer manhole which he was not aware of approximately 40' from the existing asphalt edge of the property. This is a sloping site, with the 2 setbacks, to get enough parking for the requirements of the City they have to have a small parking lot along the south side. There is approximately 5000 sq. ft. of finished space in the building. Discussion of buffers, traffic, parking requirement of 25 stalls, the location of the dumpsters and the need for addresses on Ash Street rather than Madison Professional Park. Dick made a motion to approve the plan subject to a fence on the south and a buffer on the west and appropriate City Department approvals. Bobbette seconded the motion, all voted aye, none opposed For information only, Ted discussed a proposed project for student housing located on property on 2` East next to the armory. 8/14/2001 Stan Palmer 2916 W. 17 South Idaho ,Falls, ID 83402 Dear Stan, Val Christensen Assistant Engineer cc: John Millar Chris Huskinson STATE OF IDAHO www.ci.rexburg.id.us P.O. Box 280 t� QQrq 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fax (208) 359 -3022 e -mail rexburg@ci.rexburg.id.us I have reviewed your drawings for the Davis Medical Building. Below is a list of items that need to be included or changed: 1. Please provide accessible bath details as per the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1105.1. 2. Provide truss details. It is nice to have these at time of review, but I must have them prior to frame inspections. 3. Provide a list of storage items that will be kept in all storage areas. 4. Please show exit signs at the back entrances and leading to these entrances as per 1997 UBC Section 1003.2.8.2, 5. Please show an attic access opening as per 1997 UBC Section 1505.1. 6. Provide attic space venting details as per 1997 UBC Section 1505.3. 7. Show draft stop as per 1997 UBC Section 708.3.1.2.2. 8. City ordinance requires that foundations shall be constructed at a minimum of 36" below grade for frost considerations. If this requirement can't be met due to the position of the bedrock, it is acceptable to place concrete directly on the rock surface. The rock must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. 9. Please provide shear wall details. Include wind calculations used in design. 10. Show sewer service connected to the sewer main, not to the manhole. 11. Address the Fire Department issues. 1 have attached their review at back. If you have any questions please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 314. REXBURG MADISON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 280 26 North Center Rexburg, Idaho 83440 (208) 359 -3010 1997 Uniform Fire Code Plan Date: U/K Plan Review Review Date: 8/15/01 Building Name: Grant Davis Medical Building Building Address: Ash Street Stories: One Type of Construction: V -N Occupancy Classification: B Existing Floor Area: N/A New Construction Floor Area: Approximately 7450 square feet 1).Required Fire Flow (Appendix III -A): 2,000 GPM Comments: Water supply may be reduced up to 75% if an approved sprinkler system is install in building 2).Water Supply (Article 9, Section 903) Required: YES Fire Hydrant Location: D -21, D -22 Fire Hydrant Flows: OK Fire Flow Test Location: D -21, D -22 Fire Flow Supplied By: FD Other Approved Water Source: None Water Supply Acceptable: YES Fire Hydrant Location Acceptable: YES Water Supply Comments: OK 3.)Fire Apparatus Access Roads (Article 9 Section 902) Required: YES Acceptable: Width: YES Length: YES Surface: OK Turning Radius: OK Grade: OK Vehicle Vertical: U/K Clearance: OK Turn Arounds: OK Complete Road Acceptable: OK Comments: 4).Access Roads and Water Supply, Including Fire Hydrants Are Required To Be Installed And Made Serviceable Prior To And During Time Of Construction (Article 9 Section 901.3): YES Comments: 5),Installation Of Portable Fire Extinguisher (Article 10 Section 1002) Required: YES Location Acceptable: NOT SHOWN Type Provided Acceptable: PROVIDE MINIMUM 2A -10BC AS REQUIRED Comments: SUBMIT LOCATIONS FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 6).Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems: (Article 10 Section 1003 Required: NO Type Of System Being Installed: Sprinkler System Monitoring Required (Article 10 Section 1003.3) Required: Comments: 7).Standpipes (Article 10 Section 1004) Required: NO Type Required: Comments: 8).Ventilating Hood And Duct Fire Extinguishing System (Article 10 Section 1006.2) Required: NO Type Being Provided: Automatic Fuel Shutoff Shown (Article 10 Section 1006.2.4): Portable Fire Extinguisher Shown (Article 10 section 1006.2.7): Comments: 9).Fire Alarm Systems (Article 10 Section 1007)Required: NO Type Of System Required: Manual: Automatic: Both: Type Of System Being Provided: Manual: Automatic: Both: Components Of System Shown: Smoke Detectors: Heat Detectors: Manual Pull Station: Sounding Devices: Visual Devices: Door Holders: Duct Detectors: Flow Alarm: Sprinkler Valve Monitoring: Fire Alarm System Acceptable: 10).Other Corrections That Are Required By Special Occupancy Or Conditions: Plans As Submitted Are Acceptable: YES Plans Checked By: CHRIS HUSKINSON Date: August 15, 2001 Please furnish comments back to the plan reviewer in the following manner: Written Comments: New Plans: 94.5 11011L. 9.2.2 SHADE LO DUMPST R FENC ISTING 2' GAS LINE NEV GAS LINE TO BUILDING EDGE OF OIL (Existkv) 2 ' asenent Lines er Shut off valve 100.0 N 89 58'01' Existing Elec c Transformer GRASS 4 toe of bank 99,6 TELEPHONE AND ON LOWEST LA New Paved CABLE TV E BLACK FIRE HYDRANT EDGE OF OIL (Existing) Existing Rock Garden 0 Fence Corner--- • 94,0 tr, ! a 4 o 0 00 92.3 GRA SS 5'-11 1/ 95,0 0 S 89 75'49' V 999 PROPERTY LI ES 25 50 TY LINE n - - - — - - - 939 151'-1 9/16' 2 95 0 9 5 9 ma me ecovery • limoram 1111111111111111111111112E5111116111111 9a6 99.4 100.07 SITE PLAN 25 UTAH POVER AND LIGHT PUVER cue 1'--1 9/16' 100 125 150 c cU PROPERTY LINE ow. 4--- ) xisting Parking Islands NEW 6' SEWER LINE APPROX. 250 FEET IN LENGTH htig YkT or F 'I. .•••• SEWER INV. 87.0 NEW SEWER MANHOLE 4-„ I EXISTING 8' SEWER LINE LEL-3AL pZ56 -c) MA6 ‘sol-k )V 0 0 tAWs f5 rAt-frEP-- 524 - 2-188 N Fen Cor n ti O 00 5 50 75 SITE PLA\ Scale 1' = 10' 100 125 150 LINE g Islands DD cc HANDICAPPED SIDEWALK RAMP LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT #4 MADISON PROFESSIONAL PARK, SUBDIVISION SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND 98.8 NEW ELEVATION 994 EXISTING ELEVATION (ITALICS) Q H---I ME N 0 CO D = = Q Col 0 �o CU Q L7 Z q OF1 SHEET NO. SITE PLAN FAX. 208-438-7304 N 89 58'01' E PROPERTY LINE 00 N 1 1 1 L7 J 1,,f.-J 1X¢ w l� 25 1 50 , 1 ILE 6 . . . ili URRENTL ARM OLE X q b. 3 3 • 1 UVER}fAD ULAN POYER ANI ; Lm+L POWER Ln !� PROPERTY AS LINE 2' I \ L LL Existing El- • Transformer 939 .I POWER wir Ii V _ - ' / EOS NUT I7SED 4-"R EXISTING S SEWER MAN \ J SFWE LINE / g'W I— LJ \ X LI LJ CA t I I \ r ---- \ Z k LJ 1,, ,•-■ \\\ ) \ ' \ III AND CABLE TV I I ir— 1 TELEPHONE ON LOWEST LA: VIA GRASS E BLACK ) q I II 3.51 , / 5 - - 94, 97 1 0934 2 2� 0 923 93.2 .I�• s 1110111 ° ® II I 1 011111111111 I I GRASS ' 92.3 —" H) � ••••l 75 FEET IN LE GTH NE GAS LINE .---- 94.3 SEWER _ ; „ INV, 90,0 EDGE OF OIL a C c- E o 9 6.0 - t I •6.0 (Existing) ' . I I ( I , H v all !413.2f 94.1 s NIII�IIII��! ier� ; 4 0 , 0 94.0 a -"j + o v o In d O W c 100.0 e w £ d 94s e z ecovery 1 ®A 111111111 :311111 Irr �� I SHR NEW NE GO AS LI T B UILDING "' a LI ®I'. mu a 0 ti o ( — ®II'& sommR m g L A SUNHS EDGE OF OIL (Existing) 9 *at4 'Existing Parki L � a 'Ll D a W ,.. cD . 959 GRASS 96.6 1 I II GAS MAIN ST ST i ' I I I -- HE 945 95.0 NEW 1' W I . � IIII � I a 2 1011 (I ...416 I ;�� 98,25 • LPN New ' Sidewnik 95St .li •• 99.5 .99'01 0 n s� ' 0 I EXISTING 6' WATER LINE .80.10 0 S 100,06 • 0 6 .2 00 97.. SHADE DUMPSTER L • ". W FENCE � 9� 14 1116 ^R>„ q i 'Ujef VACV: 991 97.9 asenent Lines er Shut off vetve 4 toe o° bards ---1 — 099� 99,6 - 974 99,0. 982 9., .=tr) Cr■ 4a, '11111111 ,' 99,7 New Paved 09985 0 94,7 Parking Area 99.50 994 FRE HYDRANT le , Existing Rock Garden I 100,0 S 89 75'49' V 999 i PROPERTY LIMES ---.../ 986 99,4 100,07 N Fen Cor n ti O 00 5 50 75 SITE PLA\ Scale 1' = 10' 100 125 150 LINE g Islands DD cc HANDICAPPED SIDEWALK RAMP LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT #4 MADISON PROFESSIONAL PARK, SUBDIVISION SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND 98.8 NEW ELEVATION 994 EXISTING ELEVATION (ITALICS) Q H---I ME N 0 CO D = = Q Col 0 �o CU Q L7 Z q OF1 SHEET NO. SITE PLAN FAX. 208-438-7304 EXIS ING GRADE RO:K LINE ESTIMATED 14' -10 9/16' , 62'-1 9/16' FOUNDATION PLAN Scale 1/8' = i'-0' TOP CONC. 101.67 RETAINING WALL NEAR MAIN ENTRY x FOOTING DEPTH VARIES Scale I/8' =1'-O' TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK 10' -8' 24' -9 9/16' FLOOR SLAB Scale 1/4' = 1'-0' FOUNDATION @ BASEMENT EN TRY 4' -7' 4' -4' 5/8' ANCHOR BOLTS AT 30' O.C. EXTEND THROUGH FLOOR SLAB IMBED 8' minimum in stem wall concrete. E ' -10' DROP WALL @ DOOR. SLAB TO EXTEND OVER FOOTING DEPTH VARIES TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK FOUND, WALL Existing Grade \DATI=\ SECTI Estirlated Rock Line Existing Grade Estimated Rock Line ASEMENT FLR. 12'x 12' Piers 4 places 1' -4' x 8' MIN. FOOTINGS FOOTING DEPTH VARIES TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK Scale 1/2'= L -0' TOP CONC, 101.67 FLOOR SLAB 2' OVER FOOTING WALL SECTION 1/2'= 1' -0' LOCATE ?CP OF RETAINING VALL AT SAKE ELEVATION AS FDLNDATION VALL DIRECTLY EAST RETAINING WALL AT WEST WALL O FOOTING DEPTH VARIES Scale TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK WEST WALL OF FOUNDATION FOOTIW DEPTH VARIES Scale I/8' =1'-0' TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK NORTH WALL OF FOUNDATION Scale 1/8' = 1'-0' TOP CONC, 101.67 FOOTING DEPTH VARIES TO MATCH ROCK SLOPE Top of Concrete 100.5 Existing Grade Estirlated Rock Line w G=) CD ID N ¢ 0 _I 0 w L ¢ ED cc CL CD q X ¢ W • Cv OF: SHEET NO. SD -001 Existing Grade Estimated Rock Line 3T-4' Top of Concrete 100,5 SOUTH WALL OF FOUNDATION FmTING DEPTH VARIES Scale TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK FOUNDATION SECTION FITING DEPTH VARIES TO MATCH SLOPE IF ROCK 5/8' ANCHOR BOLTS AT 30' 0.0 EXTEND THROUGH FLOOR SLAB DOMED 8' minimum in sten wall concrete. FLOOR SLAB ELEVATION Scale 1/8" -0' O Existing Grade stimnted Rock Line ` TOP CONC. 101.67 OP OF STEM VALLS AT ELEVATION 92, FOLLOV SLOPE OF ROCK EAST FOUNDATION WALLS @ NE &SE CORNERS M F Lll i ING DEPTH VARIES Scale TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK TOP CONC. 101,67 FOOTING DEPTH VARIES TO MATCH SLOPE OF ROCK 4' CONC. SLAB ELEVATION 92.33 EAST FOUNDATION WALLS N &S OF ENTRY Scale VB' EXISTING GRADE 0 ROCK LINE " ESTIMATED ROCK LINE ESTIMATED W F— Q Q H - X U CT, n OJ Q OF: SHEET NO. Proceedure Mech, 1' -11 7/8' 21' -5' Dr, Office 101.667 Handicapped Ramp Down 1 7/8' 4 3/4' -8 3/16'.4 3/4 ' 4'-7' m hildrens area 4 3/4' 18' -4 3/4' .,4 3/4' 20' -1/16' 9' 4 3/4' 9'1,6' -5 3/ Waiting Reception 13' -6 3/4' Co rt 11 1/2' 39' -1/8' 6 ' 80' MAIN FLOOR PLAN Scale UT = t' a iv oof Over er Entry ,5' -11 15/16' w Q z Q J t2 6Y n J LL_ z OF: SHEET NO, 24 12' 44' , ' , 4' 14' -3' 8' -l0' 9' -6' , 6' -8' , , 4 3/4' Basement Finish Floor Elev. 92.33 F t g . 4f- a 1, 4' 4 ` 5' 8/Z. it Hearhg Test 4 4' -9 3/4' q 4 /4' F' ti 11'Ra 8' 1177111111 -- �� ENG l r ----' '' Bearing nail, No Sheet Rock Unfinished Storage Area 6 3/4' 3'-6 I ` -1v 7/16' f_T`«kii.. 5' • 3/4' • Rec�eptio � S nge Consultation ,. I 1 7� b" � Bear, estibule Above y = i 1' -11111 • • f • Bearing Vet I Gns FJ rrxic Voter H gat er s n SOf natE Sys Waiting � • co Bearhg Walt ..... 12' 14' 8' 12' 8' 13' -3' 9 ', J . 11 -1/2' , 79' -1/2' Top of Concrete FoundationElevation 100.5 n CO BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN Scale L/8' = 1'-0' tats to treat o of G utiire Sklevalk to Street w Q cu 0 CO C] J LL OF: SHEET NO. DR, GRANT DAVIS MEDICAL BUILDING BASEMENT FAX. 208-438-7304 DARK RED BRICK 4 A WAEg STUCCO 00 25 Sill 00 50 25 RAMP HANDRAIL SAWN CEDAR SHAKES 75 EL= VATI - N @ GRIDLINE 25 (SECTION 5) 50 CUPPOLA 100.0 LINE 100.0 LINE 100 75 (SECTION E) pl 00 100 2X6 Studs @ 24' O.C. Red Brick Veneer CUT CEDAR SHAKES EAST ELEVATION @ GRIDLINE 100 Blown in Insulation 16'X Varying Thickness Footings to Match Rock Slope Wood Trusses @ 24' C.C. 25 5/8' Plywood S 125 10' 4' Floor Slab 50 2' above top of footings 150 =CTIDN I @ LINE 75 10ft0 LIN Sawn Cedar Shakes existing Rock Line 75 (Estimated) 100 L_ >-- G?a V N C'v' M I U Q OD O C'd CU J J L1 W CU O 0 0 0 D 0 m a 10 00 LINE EXIN 150 125 100 LINE 75 Fire Hydrant Sawn Cedar Shakes CUT SHAKES WEST ELEVATE] @ GRID LINE 00 (SECTION A) 50 NORTH ELEVATION @ GRIDLINE 125 (SECTION L) r Th Dark Red Brick 25 00 w Q 0 0 J W �` Z 0 — ▪ v� > W° Q L-Q H- r: o cci Z LD oCY Q <E L Q zcy J W W OF: SHEET NO, TYPICAL FLOOR FRAMING MATERIAL IS TJI 11 7/8' DEEP AND 1 1/2' VIDE FLOOR FRAMING Scale V8' = 1'-0' DOUBLE LSL AT RAKE VALLS 7' :0 :/4' f JI .s.` -/ BLOCKING OVER BEARING WALL DOUBLE LSL AT RAKE VALLS BLE LSL AT RAKE VALLS MICROLAM BEAMS SIZE TO BE DETERMINED DOUBLE LSL OVER BASEMENT BEARING VALLS DOUBLE LSL AT RAKE VALLS DOUBLE LSL OVER BASEMENT BEARING VALLS MICROLAM BEAMS SIZE TO BE DETERMINED LAMINATED STRAND CLSL) LUMBER TYPICAL AROUND ALL PERIMETER SILLS AND OVER BASEMENT sBEARING 4_____5 VALLS. 1 3/4' x 11 7/8' FULL TRUSSES FLAT BOTTOM CHORD a 24' O.C. TYPICAL' HALF TRUSSES FLAT BOTTOM CHORD, THIS AREA APPROX.'24' O.C. FULL TRUSSES FLAT BOTTOM CHORD a 24' O.C. TYPICA i ■lINNlINNNNINNIINNNNNINN P -9 3/8' ROOF SLOPE SHALL BE 6' IN 12' TYPICAL ROOF FRAMING Scale 1/8' = OUTLOOKERS 2 24' O.C. lime ■■■ ■■■■■7N�■ ioNN■■■■■■■■uNNNjj ■IIINN11NRNUBMNNININNII■ 1111111111111111111111111111 11111 OUTLOOKERS 2 24' O.C. OUTLOOKERS 2 24 O.C. K . ________.-OUTLOOKERS 2 24' QG OUTLOOKERS 2 24' O.C. SCISSOR TRUSESS 224' OD. W 1— Q Q 0, DM CDC Q C3_ J V) ED W = LL Q O Q C1 CL l3 EZ3 CY N ZZD Q X Q W OF: SHEET NO,