HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO & DOCS - 02-000467 - 125 & 127 S 4th W - Two 4-PlexesCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
City of Rexburg
Department of Building Inspection
Building Permit No. R- o2 -o8 -12
Building Street Address: 125 South 4 West
Building Owner: David L. Bowen
Contractor: B &D Construction
Description of building or portion of building for which this certificate is
issued:
Apartments - 2 Four Plexes
Occupancy:
C.O. Issued by:
Full
This Certificate, issue() rsuant to t&e requirements of Section io9 of t&e Uniform Buif in3
Cole, certifies that, at t e time of issuance, this bui[(i or tha portion of the bui[(in
� � f g that
was inspect@ on the (ate list@ was f oun( to be in compliance with the requirements of tbe
co(e for tbe group an (ivision of occupanc-N an tbe use for which tbe propose() occupancy
was cGassi f ie(.
Date: January 27, 2003 (1o:11am)
Building Offic
There shall be no future change in the existing occupancy classification of the building nor shall
any structural changes, modifications or additions be made to the building or any portion thereof
until the Build' g • cial has reviewed and approved said future changes.
Water Department ' r ire Department
State of Idaho Electrical Department - (208 -356 -4830) ❑
BUIL G PERMIT APPLICA REXBURG, ID DATE
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED
OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
OWNER
BUILDER
STRUCTURE:
O RESIDENCE
FOOTINGS
CL CONCRETE
O MASONRY
D OTHER
REMARKS:
' !c
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & ZONING
VALUE (1 t )
FEE PAID
BUILDING
INSPECTOR
JOB ADDRESS
ARCHITECT
0 NEW 0 REMODEL 0 ADDITION 0 REPAIR 0 RENEWAL 0 FIRE DAMAGE
❑ COMM. 0 EDUCATIONAL 0 GOVT CI RELIGIOUS 0 FENCE 0 PATIO 0 CARPORT 0 GARAGE 0 AWNING
INSULATED
FOUNDATION
O CONCRETE
0 MASONRY
O OTHER
BASEMENT
0 PARTIAL
0 FULL
D NO
FLOORS
0-WOOD
U 'CONCRETE
0 OTHER
EXT. WALLS
❑ WOOD
D MASONRY
0 CONCRETE
D.VENEER
D METAL
D STUCCO
INT. WALLS
0 WOOD
0 MASONRY
0 CONCRETE
ODRYWALL
0 PLASTER
O TILEv
CEILING
0 WOOD
O DRYWALL
❑ PLASTER
O TILE H
O OPEN
;
ROOF
HEAT
13GAS
0 OIL
0 COAL
❑ FIREPLACE
0 ELECTRIC
O BUILT UP.
D WOOD SH.
C- EO SH.
0 TILE
0 ROLL ROOF.
D METAL ,
This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Uniform Building Code and Zoninfiegulations of Rexburg, and it is hereby agreed
that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specifications will be completed in accordance with the regulations
pertaining and applicable thereto: The issuance of the permit does not waive restrictive covenants.
- PA fl
• AUG 2 2 2002
j
DATE
APPUCANT
WHITE - Owner's Copy CANARY - Building Departments Copy PINK Assessors Copy • ROD-In
• E
DESIGNER
O.WAI.LS
0BEIUN
D FLOOR S
0 PERIMETER
Mailing Address e f
City /State /Zip Re X /3ie/ /2 5`3 I/ 4F p
Telephone/Fax/Mobile —
When was this building last occupied Ne
Subdivision
Signature of Inspector
Signature of Applicant
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF .Il EXBURG, IDAHO
Date of Application J2- j
OWNER
Name PA i.: „4 2v r —z Two ore- if/`
Site Address / 5 /f : . W es - j
Mailing Address *3 3 S T.t c" T SxtB -e 7
City /State /Zip -''io "/ ;S'a A/ /.,) Are ! 6 —
Telephone/Fax/Mobile 1- 727— 2 1'y— 9'S 5'a
CONTRACTOR
Name ,/f o(� C6 N S / r ' u �T 0 Ai.
PROJECT INFORMATION DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
a Zone: c ,u La exi ReS e..�z
Property rtY Q Is exi g use cdmpatible with zoning, (screening parking, etc) i
Architect/ Engineer Firm Aes,'y,Y %�Y7�LPrtl�� Plan Name IL Al ` ,tl elert .,- _
Lot Block
Circle One Residential t Educational Government Remodel Other
Circle One New House Addition/Remodel to House ew Commercia? Commercial Remodel
Circle One Basement on- Finished / Unfinished Other: on Patio/ Carport/ Awning N/A
Lot Square Footage 21 fa Lot Width vee Ho 7 / 04 (7d, `,
Square Feet Garage Square Feet Number of Stories 2 Height of Building
What will structure be used for: Home Home Business °LL1 Commercial Other
Will there be an apartment? e. S- If so, how many units
Total Estimated Cost 330 D Oct Are you in a flood plain Na
Code 97 Buil ; ing Permit Fees ? 2 0 1 •
Zone ,P, Plan heck Fees 2 28 - 0 o
Building Type N V PuG � 0�= Plumb g Permit Fees .5,30,
ggini Permit Fees
a 1�1 of � �`� Water & Sewer Fees
Front Footage Fee
TOTAL $
Permit No.
C ALL Co -- S 7 (At-e 9e,
&tog a. °.
Issued by
Rough Plumbing
Septic Tank
Fixtures
Water Piping
Complete
Sewer
Bath Tubs
Urinal
Showers
Sink Trap
Laundry Trays
Water Heater
Wash Basin
Other
Toilet
Slop Sinks
Kitchen Sinks
Floor Drain
Drinking Fountains
Lawn Sprinklers
Water Softeners
Dish Washing Mach.
Clothes Washer
CITY OF REXBURG
APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT
OWNER FEES
Name Plumbing Permit $
Address Tel. Sewer Inspection $
Lot Blk. Add. Inspection of Pipe $
Inspection of Fixtures $
PLUMBER
Name
Address Tel.
NATURE OF INSTALLATION
Use
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Received: Date
By
Rough Plumbing
Sewer
Other
Finish Plumbing
$
$
TOTAL $
INSPECTOR'S RECORD
N
PAUn
AUG 2 2 2002
CITY OF REXBURG
INSP NAME
Ex=a &
Czncreta: 4 22
Masonry:
Roofing
Tnsulation: 4: - ,RNsa Lcr 7*
Drywall: ph. 12 c„rekej7;
painting: 47-4 itAt Areft7
Floor Ccverincrs:
Plumbing.:
Eteating:_jci&.- 17'e.47-,*694y
Electrical: I LCc. 77f
Roof 'r±usses:
e-HAP g4i(
4.4,vssr:
SUECONTRA (-TOR L.
4 4, _f
5M c- yes 7"
Floor / Joistz: •- IA/
LLci_i_ng/Eztarior 1.4.1e.5" 7
Sir eel 1.41vd cote; hee
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
(MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER)
8/16/2002
Scott Spaulding
Design Intelligence
135 East Main
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
Dear Scott,
STATE OF IDAHO
www.ci.rexburg.id.us
P.O. Box 280
12 North Center Street
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
Phone (208) 359 -3020
Fax (208) 359 -3022
e -mail rexburg @ci.rexburg.id.us
I have reviewed the Bowen Apartment drawings that you have provided me and
have identified the following discrepancies:
1. The lot is too small for the amount of units that are being requested. My
calculations identify 7 units allowed.
2. Elevations at parking and drives are incomplete.
3. Show 5' wide City sidewalk, curb /gutter and driveway approach.
4. Why is the curb around the parking lot incomplete? There are trees drawn in the
parking area near the spot where the curbs end. Please let me know what is going
on here.
5. A fence is required where the parking lot is adjacent to other residential property.
Please identify on plans.
6. Page SO identifies special inspections being required for the bolts in concrete.
Who will be performing these inspections? Please provide us information
regarding frequency of inspection and any details associated with these
inspections.
7. Please provide 1 hr. construction at all walls around mechanical and laundry.
Identify on plans.
8. The doors to the units need to be fire rated assemblies. Please identify as such.
9. There seems to be a bust in the floor plan dimensions. The tubs are shown to fit
nicely in an area that by my calculations is only 1'11-7/8" wide.
10. The "Typical Exterior Wall Except At Entry" detail on sheet S1 identifies on
layer of Y2" drywall an ceiling. 5/8" is the minimum on ceilings with 24" o.c.
framing
11. Please identify attic access and attic ventilation as per the 1997 Uniform Building
Code (UBC).
12. Show smoke detectors in each bedroom and one in common area outside
bedrooms.
13. Provide a copy of the plans to the State of Idaho Electrical Bureau.
14. The Fire Department has reviewed the plans. I have attached a copy of there
report.
Please return two sets of revised plans. Let me know if I can be of any further
assistance. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 324.
Sincerely,
Val Christensen
Building Official
cc John Millar
Chris Huskinson
REXBURG MADISON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 280
26 North Center
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
(208) 359 -3010
1997 Uniform Fire Code Plan Date: 8 -5 -02
Plan Review Review Date: 8 -6 -02
Building Name: BOWEN APARTMENTS
Building Address: FOURTH WEST, REXBURG
Stories: TWO Type of Construction: V -N
Occupancy Classification: R -1 Existing Floor Area: N/A
New Construction Floor Area: APPROXIMATELY 7200 TOTAL SQUARE FEET
1).Required Fire Flow (Appendix III -A): 1500 GPM /TWO HOURS
Comments: REQUIRED FIRE FLOW MAY BE REDUCED BY 75% IF BUILDING
EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
2).Water Supply (Article 9, Section 903) Required: YES
Fire Hydrant Location: ONE HYDRANT SHOWN
Fire Hydrant Flows: UNKNOWN
Fire Flow Test Location: N/A
Fire Flow Supplied By: NOT AVAILABLE
Other Approved Water Source: NONE
Water Supply Acceptable: SEE COMMENTS
Fire Hydrant Location Acceptable: YES
Water Supply Comments: PLEASE PROVIDE AN ESTIMATED WATER FLOW FROM
NEW HYDRANT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
3.)Fire Apparatus Access Roads (Article 9 Section 902)
Required: YES
Acceptable: Width: X Length: X Surface: X
Turning Radius: X Grade: X Vehicle Vertical:
Clearance: Turn Arounds: X
Complete Road Acceptable: YES
Comments:
4).Access Roads and Water Supply, Including Fire Hydrants Are
Required To Be Installed And Made Serviceable Prior To And During
Time Of Construction (Article 9 Section 901.3): YES
Comments: IF NOT INSTALLED AND MADE OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION A STOP WORK ORDER WILL BE ISSUED.
5),Installation Of Portable Fire Extinguisher (Article 10 Section
1002) Required: YES Location Acceptable: NOT SHOWN
Type Provided Acceptable: SEE COMMENTS
Comments: PROVIDE ONE FIRE EXTINGUISHER, MINIMUM SIZE OF 2A10BC,
MOUNTED IN EACH UNIT.
6).Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems: (Article 10 Section 1003
Required: NO Type Of System Being Installed:
Sprinkler System Monitoring Required (Article 10 Section 1003.3)
Required: Comments:
7).Standpipes (Article 10 Section 1004) Required: NO
Type Required: Comments:
8).Fire Alarm Systems (Article 10 Section 1007)Required: YES
Type Of System Required: Manual: Automatic: YES Both:
Type Of System Being Provided: Manual: Automatic: Both:
Components Of System: Smoke Detectors: X Heat Detectors:
Manual Pull Station:
Door Holders:
Conditions:
Sounding Devices: Visual Devices:
Duct Detectors: Flow Alarm:
Sprinkler Valve Monitoring: Fire Alarm System Acceptable: NO
Comments: PLANS DO NOT SHOW SMOKE DETECTORS. PROVIDE ONE DETECTOR
IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM AND ONE IN EACH CORRIDOR LEADING TO EACH
ROOM.
10).Other Corrections That Are Required By Special Occupancy Or
Plans As Submitted Are Acceptable: NO, PLEASE ADDRESS ABOVE ITEMS.
Plans Checked By: CHRIS HUSKINSON Date: 8 -6 -02
Please furnish comments back to the plan reviewer in the following
manner:
Written Comments: X New Plans:
Chairman: Winston Dyer,
Members: Robert Schwartz
Ted Whyte
DaVawn Beattie
Glenn Walker
Mike Ricks
Stephen McGary
Doug Smith
P.F.C. John Millar
City Attorney Stephen Zollinger - Excused
City Clerk Blair D. Kay
Winston welcomed Stephen McGary to the P &Z Commission. Winston introduced Scouts and other
developers and interested parties.
DaVawn moved to approve the minutes of May 8, 2002. Glen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
None opposed. The motion carried.
Noncontroversial Items:
REXBURG PLANNING & ZONING
May 22, 2002
7:00 p.m.
Trees: The Commission discussed the booklet about trees and vegetation in our area.
General discussion about the development of the booklet which talks about trees and vegetation in
our area. The comments were favorable to accept the booklet as a guide for our area. The Chairman
requested Devon to spearhead a committee to work on the Tree Project for the Community
Public Hearing: Zone Change from. HDR to HDR2
Eric Early Property - North side of 7th S and 3rd W
John Millar reviewed the request for a zone change with an overhead picture of the existing zoning
in the area. The area is about 5 acres.
Mr. Eric Early - He wanted to make a more intense use of the property. The request would change
the zoning from HDR to HDR2 to allow development of 192 one or two bedroom units for married
housing.
John Millar stated that a maximum of 30 units per acre are allowed for HDR with 1.5 parking stalls;
HDR2 would allow 42 units per acre for one bedroom and 36 units per acre for two bedroom units;
Either zone allows 1.5 parking stalls per unit.
1
Chairman Dyer closed Public Testimony
There was discussion from the Commission members concerning HDR and HDR2.
The zoning goes with the property, so someone could buy the property and increase the density
request for the land use.
The question was raised about future development with adjacent roadways and future roadways. The
City has a master plan to develop 7 South.
Winston did not see any written public input in the record on the zone change request.
There is HDR housing just west of the Armory.
Ted moved to approve the zone change and recommend to send to Public Hearing before the City
Council, DaVawn seconded the motion. All voted aye. None opposed. The motion carried.
East Main Neighborhood Committee Report - Presenter, Raymond Hill - President
Raymond Hill located at 328 East Main Street read the report of the East Main Neighborhood
Association. A handout is on file. The neighborhood report indicated that future growth in the area
would have a negative impact on existing homes.
Glenn thanked the group for the report. The group has 34 members. The report covers one full
block from Main Street to 1st South and 2nd East to the Hospital. Also, one single block on the North
side of Main Street East from 2nd East including the City Park to the Hospital. This makes up 3
contiguous blocks. A majority of the neighbors in the area are opposed to growth.
Discussion by the Commission was invited by Winston.
There is a letter from the Hospital on file stating that they did not participate in the report. Landlords
on 2 11d East may want to sell their properties. Winston - This effort from the citizens deserves a
response. Glenn recommended tabling the issue because neither the hospital nor the community are
desiring change in the area of the report.
Robert made a motion to table this matter until there is a concrete proposal before the Commission
that would trigger the investigative process again on this issue. It was seconded by Ted. All voted
Aye to table the report, except Mr. Doug Smith who abstained, The Motion carried.
Request for Conditional Use Permit - 137 N 5 W - Jackie Toll
Jackie Toll property was reviewed on an overhead by John Millar.
They are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build duplexes in an LDR1 zone.
Mr. Williams - They are developing both parcels with 8 units per acre in duplexes.
2
Discussion on the need for more specific information on this site. This information will be available
in a Public Hearing on the site plan.
John - A duplex can be done by right in LDR1. A site plan needs to be put before the Commission
for review. The two parcels will be treated as one parcel.
Doug made a motion to return the request to the developer to complete a Site Plan that is fully
developed with adequate information, (i.e.) parking, ingress, egress, landscaping, fire protection,
including the City Engineering Departments requirements before going to public hearing.
Glenn seconded the motion, All voted Aye, None apposed. The motion carried.
Site Plan Review - Bowen Apartments at 125 S. 4 West
John reviewed the request on the overhead screen. The current zoning is MDR. The fire department
has not reviewed the plan.
Mr. Scott Spaulding - The developer would like to develop 2 four- plexes for married housing.
Mike recommended to deny the request because it is short on square footage by 644 square feet.
Mike made a motion to deny the Bowen Apartments Site Plan for lack of conformance, Doug
seconded the motion, After discussion the Commission called for a vote. All voted aye, the motion
carried.
Site Plan Review - WestMark Credit Union (East behind Grease Monkey)
John reviewed the site plan on an overhead and recommended approval of the site plan.
The developer did not have representation.
Discussion on access for the area.
Glenn made a motion to accept the site plan subject to department head approvals. DaVawn
seconded the motion. All voted Aye. The motion carried.
Request Sign Variance - Chamber of Commerce - 420 S. 4 th W
Donna Benfield introduced Russ Carlson from Young Electric Sign Co.
The Chamber is requesting a sign to advertise the Rexburg Chamber Office location.
Donna presented information on the site for a two sided sign and the need for the sign.
The Chamber has begun a new ad campaign to let Freeway traffic know where the Chamber Office
is located. Russ - The Chamber is putting an effort into bringing tourists into town. Les Schwab
manager's letter was read indicating, they were getting the traffic from the chamber.
(Letter from Les Schwab is on file)
3
John - This property has fully utilized the square footage allowed for signs.
Russ - The Cotton Tree Sign is large and limits the possibilities for the Chamber.
Winston discussed what would be allowed if the Chamber owned their own lot.
Discussion on the signs on the property. Mike Ricks commented that the Commission would have
to stay with the existing ordinance. Winston reviewed the conditions for a variance. The next step
would be to send this to a public hearing. Doug expressed the hardship that the Chamber is
experiencing. Continued discussion on the merits of allowing a variance.
Discussion from the floor on the difficulty of finding the Chamber from the existing sign.
John discussed the right of way line and that the sign would be on private property and it could not
go out into the highway right of way. Steve expressed his opinion that three of the four variance
conditions have impacted the Chamber.
Doug made a motion to send to public hearing for a sign variance, Da Vawn seconded the motion.
All voted Aye except Mr. Ricks who voted Nay. The motion carried.
Conditional Use Permit 115 S. 2 " W - Dennis Hebdon
John reviewed the request on an overhead screen.
Winston asked if there were any concerns on requirements.
Dennis Hebdon - Reviewed the need for the units for BYU - Idaho College students
Discussion on parking for his business and the occupancy rate of the other units.
DaVawn made a motion to send the request to Public Hearing with conditions approved by the City
Department Heads, Glenn seconded the motion. All voted Aye. The motion carried.
Preliminary Subdivision Plat review - Mark Andrews Addition
John review the plat on an overhead and said that it meets lot frontage.
John indicated a need for fire protection approval to allow a turn around area.
Jeff Williams - Representing the developer asked for a clarification on page 20 of the zoning
ordinance. Do you only need .21 acres? John responded - 16 units per acre on page 23 of the zoning
ordinance, or .25 Acers per unit. The ordinance is changing to 45 foot radius for cul de sacs with
City Council approval. Discussion 011 the proposal. Mike moved to approve the preliminary plat
subject to the new ordinance. The motion was seconded by Ted. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
Preliminary Subdivision Plat Review - 840 S. 4 W- Rocky Mountain Way
4
John reviewed the property and plat on an overhead screen between 7 and 8 South. It is the Greg
Moffit property. The request will require water and waste water services 600 feet away from the
platted area. The PRD was discussed which requires setbacks. Winston asked about the utilities
being extended. John said it would be on the site plan with City involvement.
Mr. Kurt Rowland - Representing Forsgren & Associates will address the requirements of the PRD
and change the plat plan where necessary. Discussion : The Commission would like more information
on the plat plan. The size of the lot and parking were discussed. The acreage is 3.3 acres with
property purchased from the School.
Robert made a motion to re -do the preliminary plat to address planned unit development, parking per
the ordinance, covenants, restrictions, set backs, buffered areas, green space, turn around, and street
width. Da Vawn seconded the motion. All Voted Aye. The motion carried to re -do the
preliminary plat. Discussion followed concerning street width on private drives and fire protection
access and turn around capability.
Preliminary Subdivision Plat Review - Robert Erikson - Airport Road
Ted White was excused due to conflict of interest.
John - Reviewed the plat on an overhead screen, noting missing information.
Ted White - Representing Robert Erikson Family Trust, discussed the survey plat for a subdivision
on Airport Road. The first three lots will be hooking up to the City Storm drain from North Main
Street. After the third lot was sold a subdivision plat was required by City Ordinance. Doug Smith
asked about the freeway appearance of the area, noting that green space would be nice. The
Commission needed more information to make a decision on the plat. Glenn made a motion to turn
down the application and have them address the requirements in the City Subdivision Ordinance The
motion was seconded by Doug. All voted Aye. The motion carried.
Site Plan Review - Celestial Village (Rexburg Apts. LLC) - Westates Subdivision
Ted Whyte was excused due to a conflict of interest. John reviewed the plat on an overhead screen.
This is the first phase of a multi -phase development.
Dave Montgomery - This is 36 units of 144 units of a 5 acre development. The first three units will
start July 1 and be completed in December. The rest will be completed in August 2003. Lighting is
only planned on the Building.
John - They have utilized 25% of their parking for compact parking which is only available in single
housing.
Discussion: Parking should be full sized for this type of development.
John - West States Development is extending services to this development.
Doug - Do they need street lights for this development with a bike path in the area.
John - The City will require street lights at the intersections for this proposal.
5
John - The developer will have to plow the road for next winter
Dave - The units will be three story
DaVawn made a motion to approve the Site Plan as presented subject to City approval, specifically
addressing lighting on the entrance and full size parking. Mike seconded the motion. Discussion:
Parking stall on the NE corner of the property presents a problem.
All voted Aye. Ted abstained. The motion carried.
Site Plan Review for Main Street Station Between 4th and Stn W. - Greg Luce
Winston declared a conflict of interest and stepped away from the table.
John - Reviewed the plat on an overhead screen. It is a 68 unit development requiring HDR zoning.
The City is working with the developer to extend a water line through the property. The Storm Sewer
will be extended to 5th West.
Mr. Winston Dyer - Represented Mr. Luce - The City has desires to improve the water supply in this
area. Discussion on the storm drain line and the water lines for the City. City utilities are being
enhanced in this proposal. The neighbors have been consulted and they have concerns about traffic
flow for the development. There would be a hard gated roadway for fire and emergency vehicle
access. This roadway would not be open to the general public and would help keep the traffic
circulation down for the neighbors.
Discussion on the amount of traffic at 8:00 am from this development on to main street.
John - Indicated that there is not enough traffic to necessitate a traffic study. There was discussion
on the need for a turning lane.
Jack Covington - Concerned about cars driving in on 1st North to keep cars from trying to access the
apartments through to the apartments. Julie - She noted that the break away gate would be past the
first property owner's property. Larry Widison - The parking is close to main street which will
congest the first North area. Winston suggested that a 200 foot distance from the first unit would
be too far for a resident to walk from the parking area. Julie - A five foot fence will be installed
around the development and would discourage parking on the street. Moroni Burton - The entrance
is too close to my landlord's drive way. An average of 100 cars will be added by this development.
The good will 5 foot fence is on the property line, which only gives us 5 feet between our house and
the fence, thus limiting our access to our back yard. The parking lot lighting is a concern. Winston -
The developer will add a gate in the fence for the back yard. Lighting fixtures can be picked to have
a downward focus to limit the neighbors exposure to the lighting. DaVawn - The driveway was
discussed. Winston - The Highway Department has not approved the access.
Craig Hanney - He is located on the East side of the Development. The fence is 5 feet and his fence
is 6 feet. Craig will talk to Mr. Luce about the height of the fence.
There was discussion on the need to relocate the power line. Doug - The parking is not distributed
evenly for the apartments in the back. John - The parking has to be within 200 feet of the units.
6
Glenn - Discussed the parking inequities of the development. Maybe the parking should be changed.
Julie - It was planned this way to accommodate the neighbors.
There was discussion on the plan as it is currently presented.
Stephen McGary made a motion to accept the site plan review with the conditions for access, lighting,
gated roadway, and access to the Burton property be addressed. The motion was seconded by Doug.
All voted Aye. Winston abstained. The motion carried.
Final Plat Oakbrook Subdivision - (Westates)- Stan Rowlan
John - Reviewed the plat on the overhead screen and recommended approval.
Glenn - Is there an easement for the canal? The canal company has access to the canal. The retention
pond /park is there for a storm drain overflow.
Ted is selling other property for the developer but not this property.
Robert made a motion that this plat be accepted subject to departmental approval and correction of
the area calculation for lot 2 block 4. DaVawn seconded the motion.
All voted Aye. The motion carried
Proposed Zone Change from MDR to HDR - 586 S. Porter Road
John reviewed the proposed zone change on an overhead screen. Both sides of the property are
HDR. There was discussion on an earlier requested zone change. This property was approved in
March for a site plan. Mike suggested to leave the zoning to MDR that was approved in March.
Mike made a motion to deny the zone change. Robert seconded the motion.
Discussion - Buffering was offered in the last zone change to MDR. The original proposal in March
was MDR. The minutes for the meeting that approved the MDR zoning were requested for review.
Glenn commented that local schools will be impacted and should be part of this process. All voted
Aye. The motion carried to deny the zone change.
Discussion of duplex mobile homes in mobile home parks
Karen Arritt - Millhollow Home Park manager requesting to add duplex units to the Park on their
larger lots. The lots are being rented and the average lot size is 60 feet by 100 feet.
John - The City would have to review lots on a case by case basis. Ordinance 548 would have to be
reviewed. They will look like a manufactured home. Discussion on the type of homes and how they
are set up.
Karen - They will be set up on a gravel base like a mobile home. Winston - Requested City staff
review and give input. John - Would like to handle in the building department on a lot by lot basis.
7
It is a building department issue. Robert thinks that it is a zoning issue.
Glenn made a motion to send this request back to the City Building Department for review.
DaVawn seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motioned carried to remand the request back
to the City Departments for review.
Discussion on HDR2 Zoning
John - HDR2 allows up to 42 single bedroom units per acre. HDR allows 30 units per acre.
Discussion on the HDR2 Zoning and adding incremental jumps within the zoning,
(i.e.) 26 -30 units, 30 -34 units, etc. The height limitations for HDR and HDR2 are three stories,
which would require sprinklers. The City of Rexburg is limited to 2.5 story fire fighting capability.
Parking spaces drive the number of units per acre. Winston Proposed to add this Discussion to the
26 of June P &Z meeting for further discussion.
Kent Archibald - Discussion on extending office space 12 feet
Kent review his proposal on an overhead screen. There was discussion on the street and what options
were available for the office expansion. Expansion to the South would not meet setback
requirements. Eastward expansion would be subject to City Departmental approvals.
Discussion of Eaglewood Subdivision Plat - Ted White
Ted declared a conflict of interest and left the table.
Ted gave an explanation for a different subdivision plat option without adding property at the end of
Yale Ave. This would change three lots and add a walking path. Ted offered an official proposal to
go to City Council with this change to the plat. There was discussion on changing the original
approved plat. John didn't have any problem going with this plat. Doug Smith made a motion to
accept this plat as the final plat to go to City Council. The motion was seconded by DaVawn. All
voted aye. Ted abstained. The motion carried.
Discussion changing zoning on the Erickson Pontiac Property to HDR.
Discussion concerning changing the zoning from HBD to HDR. There are apartments on three sides
of the old dealership. There is 2.8 acres at this site.
Meeting adjourned at 12:30 am 5 -23 -2002
8
Chairman: Winston';Dyer
Members: Robert Sphwartz - Excused
Ted Whyte
DaVawn Beattie - Conducting for Winston
Glenn Walker
Mike Ricks
Steve McGary
Doug Smith
Jacob Fullmer - Excused
P.F.C. John Millar
P & Z Admin Kurt Hibbert
City Attorney Stephen Zgllinger
City Clerk Blair D. Kay
DaVawn welcomed the community members to the meeting.
Approval of the Minutes:
Ted made a motion to approve the minutes of May 22, 2002. Glenn seconded the motion.
All voted aye, None opposed. The motion carried.
Noncontroversial Items:
New Business:
REXBURG PLANNING & ZONING
June 12, 2002
7:00 p.m.
7 :10 Public Hearing for Annexation & Zone Change from RR to MDR
Nelda Jeppesen /Cal Hulse - 1042 & iogS South and 1000 West
Judy Hobbs - Representing the Jeppesens indicated that they are requesting MDR zoning as
recommended by City Council.
DaVawn - Opened the meeting to Public Comment
Public Comment in favor:
Sharron Jeppesen Apologized for the feelings that have been caused by this proposal.
The sale of this property represents a life's work for the Jeppesens. Sharron requested that
the property be developed by the free market process. She indicated that BYU I is in need
of additional housing for the students.
1
Christine Hulse -1038 South 1000 West - Their home is uninsurable and must be torn down. They
would like to have the zoning changed to MDR, which would help them replace their home.
Christine would like to sell this property with the Jeppesen property.
Public Comment Neutral:
Richard Holloway - Offered a neutral opinion for the Madison School district. The School District
is concerned for the safety and well-being of the students. The School board would like an
impact study conducted on the growth of this area.
Tom Leman - Requested his letter be put in the file concerning a traffic flow study request.
Public Comment in Opposition:
Don Rydalch - 648 South 5 6 West - Ho offered high respect for the Jeppesen and the Hulse families.
They have a neighborhood cofnittee who support a residential neighborhood.
Mr. Rydalch offered an opinion that it is not uncommon for Universities to have married
housing. There are 26 homes in this area. MDR zoning will cause all 26 homes to be sold
in due time. If this area is annexed, Don recommended a lower density for residential
zoning.
Weston Lawrence -1144 South 1000 West- He feels that his location will be greatly affected by this
proposal. Weston proposed a moratorium of at least one year after the City Council has
denied a prior zoning change request. He proposed to let the buck stop here.
Neil Christensen 1143 South 1000 West - Neil read a letter from Tom & Lucy Blackham. This
letter is on file. The letter referred to prior communications for the Mayor during their
annexation process, and the conflicts that were addressed during annexation of this area.
The Blackhams support low density residential zoning. Neil mentioned how the growth in
the area has caused poor road conditions.
Daren Call - 1089 South 1000 West Daren agreed with Mr. Holloway's comments. He was
concerned with the growth in the area. He requested to have the Commission slow down
and be steady and careful in the commissions decisions.
Cindy Beck -1187 South 1000 West - Cindy is concerned with the increase in traffic. Every'
day she takes about 10 minutes to cross the road safely. She has been told that the
apartments are not filling at this time. She wants the existing units to be utilized before
more growth is allowed. She would prefer to have more families in the neighborhood.
Randal Foster - 1057 South 1000 West: Randal asked for a count of the number of people in the
meeting that are opposed to this development. About 10 people stood up.
Additional Comments in support of the Development:
Sharron Jeppesen - She mentioned the lack of sidewalks in the area. Low density will increase the
number of children in the area. This neighborhood has large Iots backing into larger
parcels. The impact of this development will enhance the area.
Judy Hobbs - She indicated that the values for some of the property in the area will rise
substantially.
Additional Public Comment in Opposition:
Lilla Lawrence -1144 South 1000 West - She feels that this development will force us out of our
homes.
DaVawn closed the Public Hearing
The commission reviewed page 20 in the Zoning Ordinance book.
Ted Whyte - Annexation can better address street and side walk issues for the school children.
This is a transitional zoning area LDR1 is there to protect residential single family homes.
Eight dwelling units are allowed in LDRi. MDR allows 16 dwelling units per acre with
similar restrictions as in LDRi. Ted thought this area should move to MDR.
Mike Ricks - He feels that the developments in the area are moving at an aggressive rate. Mike
would choose a slower pace. From a planning standpoint, Mike would prefer residential
development in this area. Mike would prefer to stop the annexations into the City for a
period of time.
Glenn Wacker - Glenn is concerned with the growth, however this area will be improved if
the area is developed with sidewalks through MDR requirements. City Engineering studies
do not indicate a need for traffic control at this time.
DaVawn - He expressed the feeling that MDR zoning would enhance the safety with sidewalks and
new road improvements.
Stephen Zollinger - There are no plans to improve 7 South and add two lanes.
Mike made a motion to have a safety study completed on the intersection at 7t' South and 5 West.
Stephen Zollinger - indicated that the last study could support about 7 times more traffic. The last
study showed a 47 second wait time to cross the intersection.
DaVawn ask Stephen what the City Council's feelings are concerning this proposal. Council
Member Benfield concurred with Stephen that the City Council was willing to approve MDR,
however, they were not willing to approve HDR zoning for this area.
Mike's motion died for the lack of a second.
Steve McGary - indicated that MDR would be a natural buffer from higher development that would
be possible in the area. DaVawn called for a motion after discussion.
Ted made a motion to recommend annexation of this property with MDR zoning and send to
City Council for a public hearing, with the requirements contained in MDR zoning.
Glenn seconded the motion - All voted aye, except Mike who voted nay. The motion carried.
3
8:30 Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit for Storage Units
Taylor Storage - 128 E. Cemetery road
Stephen - reviewed the site plan with the Commission and the public.
Steve Taylor - 4332 East 500 North in Rigby - He presented the site plan and discussed the timing
of construction. The buildings will be constructed out of cinder block and metal. He will
provide a chain link fence with' slats. The buildings are about 13 feet tall. The ditch on the
south side will be sloped and can be used for irrigation. Storage sheds are good neighbors.
They will have fire hydrants for the development.
Public Comment in favor:
Ken Benfield - Ken owns the property and he feels the development would be great.
Public Comment Neutral:
Rudd Phillips - 211 West 1500 North - He is concerned with the trash that comes from a
development. He feels that a fence is necessary across the back end of the property on the
North side.
Brad Bishoff -131 West 1500 North - Brad would prefer a privacy fence to shelter his home from
the development. He is concerned about dust from the traffic due to his allergies.
DaVawn closed the public comment
(Doug arrived for the meeting)
Glenn referred the Developer to the ditch or canal company for review. Steve indicated that the
final plat would address that issue. Glenn preferred a fence to surround the property.
Ted requested that a fence be installed to buffer the residential homes.
Glenn requested information on landscaping planned for the development.
Stephen discussed the fence and driveway issue with the neighbors and developer.
Glenn made a motion to approve the conditional use permit, with conditions:
#1) Taylors and the bordering neighbors, the Bishoffs strike up an agreement on the
fence, that is acceptable and within reason.
#2) Taylors will maintain a barrier either with a building or fences all the way
around the area they are building as they expand the project.
#3) Agreeable to the City staff with adequate fire protection. Ted seconded the
motion. Discussion - All voted aye. The motion carried.
4
9:02 Public Hearing for a Zone Change from LI to HDR
Jack Zollinger - 4 West 2 North
Kurt reviewed the plat on the overhead screen.
Stephen Zollinger - Concerning the westerly portion of the property, Zollingers agreed with the
City to make this portion residential. Stephen indicated that he is not representing
the owners of this property.
Judy Hobbs - Represented Jack Zollinger for this proposal.
Public Comment:
No public comment.
Public Comment was closed
Glenn made a motion to recommend a zone change form Light Industrial (LI) to HDR and send to
City Council for public hearing. Doug seconded the motion. All voted aye, none opposed. The
motion carried.
9:09 Public Hearing for a Zone from LDR1 & LI to HBD
Madison School District 321 - 246 & 290 North 1t East
Stephen review the proposal on the overhead screen.
School Board Representative Varr Snedaker - Lot 2 where the buses are parked has been irritating
to the Jensens. The School District plans to buy the property for additional office space.
Public Comment:
No public offered on this issue.
Public:" Comment was closed
Doug Smith made a motion to change lot 2 from LDRi to HBD and the School property from
LI to HBD and send to City Council for Public Hearing . Mike seconded the motion, all voted aye,
none opposed. The motion carried.
9:15 Public Hearing for a Zone Change from AG-1 to MDR
Walker Property - off Barney Dairy Rd, East of 350 E. 3''d N.
Glenn declared a conflict of interest and stepped down from the table.
Kurt Hibbert reviewed the proposal on the screen and the existing zoning.
Stephen indicated that the old river bed is the boundary. The river bed has changed its location.
Judy Hobbs - Represented the Walkers who want to do multi- family housing.
5
Public Comment:
Sheila Barney - Barney Dairy Road - Requested the location of the access for the new development.
The Legal Council, Stephen Zollinger did not have enough information at this time to
respond to the question. Mrs. Barney has concerns about safety issues with the additional
traffic.
Glenn commented that the School District has ignored certain safety concerns from the Walker
family. Members of the Commission were in agreement with Mrs. Barney on the road's
safety issues.
Ted made a motion to recommend this parcel, the Walker parcel, go to City Council with a yes vote
from P&Z for re- zoning from AGi to for MDR. Mike seconded the motion, all voted Aye.
None opposed. The motion carried. Winston and Glenn abstained from the vote.
Winston arrived and took charge of the meeting.
9 :30 Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit for a Used Car Lot
Josh Stephens - 390 S. 5 W. (0500 Mechanics)
Stephen provided a staff report for this proposal. Staff has no concerns with this proposal.
Brent Stevens - 402 N 2000 E, Madison County - Provided information to the Commission on the
proposal. Cars by Ordinance must be sold off asphalt.
Public Comment:
No public Comment
Public Comment was closed
Deliberation by the Commission on the current approved site plans South of the property in
question. Lighting and new development in the area was discussed. Clarification was
requested on having black top for the sale of cars. Stephen could not find any requirement
for asphalt to sell cars.
Winston questioned who has access to a farm road at the site which crosses the rail road tracks.
The Commission is concerned with the access to the site on the farm road.
Ted made a motion to grant a conditional use permit for this lot to sell used cars with out access to
the future road to the South that will be developed or that the existing rail road crossing (farm
access road) will not be used except for emergency services, that the applicant will revisit this Board
in one year from the time of approval to address black topping as the Business grows, that the site
triangle for visibility on the South corner for the new intersection will not be violated.
DaVawn seconded the motion. All voted aye, none opposed. The motion carried.
6
• Site Plan Review - Scott Spaulding - Bowen Apts
Kurt Hibbert - (Planning and Zoning Administrator) - Reviewed the site plan on the overhead
screen. The Fire Department approved the site plan.
Glenn commended the requestor for providing a completed site plan with the necessary fire
protection approved by the Fire Department.
Scott Spaulding - This plan meets all of the Cities requirements. He appreciated the comments
given by the Fire Department to help with the plan.
Commission discussed the set backs and lighting issues. Glenn commented that a parking lot
should have adequate lighting. Parking requirements were met in the site plan. The
lighting would need to be added on the building for the parking lot.
Steve McGary moved to accept the site plan with additional lighting from the building that would
aluminate the parking lot area and additional lighting for the street access. Mike seconded
the motion, all voted aye. None opposed. The motion carried.
Request for Zone change - Rik Wadhohn - 347 S 4 W
(Three legal descriptions)
Rik Wadholm - Requesting to change zoning from HBD to HDR. Rik explained his proposal
to the Commission. This proposal includes additional property for 42 married units.
Winston read previous minutes from City Council and P&Z concerning the prior approval of P&Z
for HDR on lot 3. When City Council reviewed the request, they indicated to the applicant a
preference for MDR. zoning. The applicant withdrew his request from City Council because
he was not interested in MDR. zoning for the request.
This request has added additional property to build 42 units.
Winston read petitions from concerned neighbors that are against HDR. They feel MDR would
be acceptable. He mentioned that petitions are not very weighty, however, the comments on
the petition are valuable to the commission.
Stephen - Indicated that the developer has made the changes requested by the City Council.
Public Comment:
Craig Forsby - Bare Street - The residents are concerned with safety for children. They
have issues with traffic and the density of the request. They would prefer MDR.
Mrs. Forsby explained that the children walk to Kennedy school on the same street as the new
traffic would use for access. Fourth South is a very busy road.
7
Rik Wadholm indicated traffic flow would not be routed onto 4 South. It would be routed where
Oklahoma's handle is located on the plat plan. He explained that MDR would allow him to build
22 units verses 4o units for HDR. The development would include a laundry and recreation room.
The outside development would include green areas and playgrounds. His developers would
pursue HDR to the fullest extent.
Glenn made a motion with moderate consideration to send this request for zone change to City
Council for reconsideration with the same intent as the motion made on April 10, 2002, which
stated: `that they approve the zone change from HBD to HDR and send it to Public Hearing before
the City Council'. Doug Smith seconded the motion to remand this request to the City Council with
the same recommendation previously approved. Discussion: The purpose for this identical motion
is to eliminate additional meetings and take the request back to City Council where it can be
adjudicated. The Commission voted as follows:
Those voting Aye: Winston Those voting Nay: Steve
Glenn Mike
Doug Ted
DaVawn
The Commission's vote was four Ayes and three Nays. The motion carried.
• Preliminary plat review - Rocky Mountain Way - Forsgren & Associates
Kurt Hilbert - reviewed the plat on the overhead screen
Kurt Rowland - Representing Rick Hancock and Forsgren & Associates reviewed the plat. This is
a planned residential development(PRD).
Winston asked if the protective covenants or binding conditions were available. Stephen said the
City has not received these covenants.
Kurt Rowland - The full packet is being developed at this time.
Mike Ricks - Discussed the parking issues and snow removal concerns. Mike represents this area
being discussed on the P&Z Commission. Street parking was discussed by the Commission.
The parking on the street may inhibit the driveway parking.
Doug made a motion to approve the preliminary site and plat plan with conditions which include:
1) Protective covenants
2) Comply with Ordinances on PRD developments approved by staff.
The motion was seconded by DaVawn. Discussion on the quality of the plat and the width of the
streets. All voted aye, None opposed. The motion carried.
• Request for Conditional Use Permit - Brian Lemon - 249 Mohawk
Winston noted that it could be conditioned to family use. Ted Whyte recommended to send this
request to a public hearing with the PRTZ Commission. Glenn seconded the motion, all voted aye.
None opposed. The motion carried.
• Impact Zone from Madison County /Lamoreaux Muhlestein Annexation
& Zoning assignment for the new annexation
Kurt Hibbert - Reviewed the Rexburg City Impact Zone for the Commission on the overhead screen.
Kurt recommended amending the impact area to include the new development.
Stephen Indicated that the proposed impact zone change needs a motion to move it to hearing.
DaVawn made a motion to accept the proposed impact zone change and send it to a joint public
hearing with Madison County and the City of Rexburg. Steve seconded the motion. All voted aye,
none opposed. The motion carried.
(The joint hearing on this impact zone change will be July 9 in the County Commissioners
chambers at 7:00 p.m.)
John made a formal proposal to have P&Z meet on the is and 3'd Tnursday. The proposal was
deferred to the end of the meeting.
DaVawn made a motion with Stephen's clarification to have the P&Z Commission allow the staff to
schedule the hearings on the Lamoreauz annexation consistent with the statutory provisions that
regulate the impact zone. Ted Whyte seconded the motion. All voted aye, none opposed.
The motion carried
• Preliminary and Final Plat Review - Spruce Addition
Ted Whyte stepped down from the table because of a conflict.
Stephen Zollinger reviewed the plat on the overhead screen. The new Cul De Sac radius is 57 feet.
Lee Gagner - 2555 Fieldstream Lane Reviewed the plat on the overhead screen. He asked that it
be approved for a preliminary and a final plat by the commission. Lee clarified that the Spruce
Addition plat is a final plat. Discussion on the plat by the Commission and concerns were raised
over the half road proposal. The City would require a two lane paved road for this development.
Winston asked Stephen if this plat could be a final plat. Lee said this is a final plat request.
Doug Smith made a motion to approve the Spruce Addition as a final plat with a condition of the
plat having proper signatures to send to the City Council. DaVawn seconded the motion.
Ted Whyte abstained from the vote. The other Commission members voted aye, none apposed.
The motion carried
Old Business:
• Final Plat Review - Andrews Addition Mountain River Engineering
Stephen - Staff reviewed the Andrews Addition Plat and recommends approval.
Larry Hudson - 1020 East Lincoln Idaho Falls - Reviewed the plat and revisions requested
by City staff.
Discussion on the name of the road and the plat.
Ted made a motion to approve the final plat as drawn, Mike seconded the motion without
conditions. All voted aye, None opposed. The motion carried
Mr Ricks discussed the issue of street width. He recommended private drives have a minimum of
30 feet to accommodate fire trucks. Discussion from the commission on private roads. Stephen
was asked about the 3o foot requirement and could it be required on a private street or road? The
length of the road may be what controls the issue.
Kurt Hibbert was asked to include this issue in the next meeting for changing Ordinances.
Winston addressed the Meeting schedule for P&Z. The recommendation from City Council was to
have P&Z meet on the 1st and 3r Thursdays.
The Proposed New Zone to be created west of town - Ted said it is stalled. The County is
reviewing the information that Ted has gathered. The area is within the impact zone. Road right
of way was discussed. Sixty foot wide roads are recommended for snow removal. New zoning for
rural areas will be put on the next agenda.
Winston noted that the City Council has purchased a video that discusses urban sprawl and its effect
on City services. He recommended that the Commission become familiar with the videos content.
This would allow the commission to become proactive with their decisions.
Discussion on having a City Ordinance requiring a specific width for private streets or roads in the
City. Discussion on staff approvals that are covered by City Ordinance.
Meeting adjourned at 11:47 p.m.
10
Designed By:
ott
pauldin
&
Checked By:
Date:
/
Date:
Date: August 6, 2002
Subject: Bowen Apartments, Rexburg, Idaho
Customer: Bowen
Design Intelligence, LLC
Engineering Calculations Summary
This analysis uses the Design Criteria required by the local jurisdiction and the 1997 UBC as the basis for the
calculations.
Materials:
Dimensional Lumber - UBC Design Values Used
Concrete: 2500 psi @ 28 days
Reinforcing Steel - #4 and smaller Grade 40, #5 and larger Grade 60
Assumptions:
UBC 1997 — Foundations designed for Max Brg Pressure of 2000 psf
Design Loads:
Snow = 35 psf
Seismic = Seismic Zone 3
Wind = 80 mph, Exposure C
References:
Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition
Customer Drawings
TrusJoist MacMillian Design Guides
Summary:
All beam sizes and footing sizes are noted on the drawings.
These calculations and included details are for
this location and customer only and not to be
reused in any manner without the written
consent of Design Intelligence.
9' S.
1717'0
17
ZOOZ/9 /8
9£'0
8Z'0
8Z
auOZ - CO
te09- 1'0"
IquozUGH
0 ejnsodx3
8'OZ
4dw 06
jsd
jsd
�sd
jsd
4sd
jsd
ZZ'0
61
VZ
17'91•
4dw 08
sb
9
9'LZ
6'6Z
0'S£
0'9£
esn
= 1
4 abed
Z4
6
IsogieA
IBIUOzuoH
9'ZI-
bO
aO
4dw 01
A
jsd
1sd
Ad
17'6
17'L
6'S
9'Z
0'0
0'0
OHval 'o n8X32i
SIN31ALLAVdV 143M08
9£ = eO
Ad
d
M
211M*I BO•9'Z
d
uoponpea
gduw
jsd
1791.'0
ten
=A
= 4d
1
= sb
M, sb }bO4,aO =d
speol
alwsleS
speol pu!M
ZG Z4 43I1d iddli
1 01- 4 1
Z4 9 4311d JOOI
Z I. 9 4341d loos
Z4 17 4311d 10021
ZL £ 4 4
until
spew' Mous
3IwsleS
peal Pu!M
:pew Mous
spew u6lsaa
0P1£8 oyepl '6mgxall
V alms `u!eini 1se3 5£ 6
O11 'eaue6malul u6lsaa
Type
Fb psi
Fv psi
E psi
LVL
2600
285
1900000
GLB
2400
190
1800000
DF
1300
95
1900000
Beam 1
Second Floor Support
Type
LVL
Fb psi
2600
Fv psi
285
=.
E psi
.:1900000,
-_
--
Span =
Tributary Area =
1 5
15,_
Loads
Point Load =
0
Ibs
0
40
15
Snow
psf
Uniform Load =
0
Ibs/ft
Live Load
psf
600
Ibs/ft
Dead Load
psf
-
225
Ibs/ft
Moment
Live Load Moment =
12675
lb-ft
=
152100
lb-in
Dead Load Moment =
4753
lb-ft
=
57038
lb-in
Section Modulus Required
=
80.44
in3
Section Width = 3.5 in.
=
= -
Depth
Section De th =
- 11:875
in.
Section Modulus Provided =
82.3
in3
OK
Moment of Ineritia Provided =
488.4
in4
Deflection
Live Load =
0.03
in.
L/360
0.43
in.
OK
Dead Load =
0.16
in.
Total =
0.18
in.
Lf240
0.65
in.
OK
Horizontal Shear
fv =
194
psi
OK
FV =
285
psi
Allowable
Reaction =
5362.5
Ibs
Use
3.5
X
11.875
LVL
Design Intelligence, LLC
135 East Main, Suite A
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
BOWEN APARTMENTS 8/6/2002
REXBURG, IDAHO
Page 1
Type
Fb psi
Fv psi
E psi
LVL
2600
285
1900000
GLB
2400
190
1800000
DF
1300
95
1900000
Beam 2
B1 Support
Type
LVL
Fb psi
2600
Fv psi
285
E psi
1900000
Span =
85
ft
Tributary Area =
ft
Loads
Point Load =
5400
Ibs
0
40
I15
Snow
psf
Uniform Load =
0
Ibs/ft
Live Load
psf
80
Ibs/ft
Dead Load
psf
30
Ibs/ft
Moment
Live Load Moment =
12198
lb -ft
=
146370
lb-in
Dead Load Moment =
271
lb-ft
=
3251
lb-in
Section Modulus Required
=
57.55
in3
3.5`
Section Width =
in
Section Depth =
11.875
in.
Section Modulus Provided =
82.3
in3
OK
Moment of Ineritia Provided =
488.4
in4
Deflection
Live Load =
0.13
in.
L/360
0.28
in.
OK
Dead Load =
0.00
in.
Total =
0.14
in.
L1240
0.425
in.
OK
Horizontal Shear
fv =
212
psi
OK
FV =
285
psi
Allowable
Reaction =
3167.5
Ibs
Use
3.5
X
11.875
LVL
Design Intelligence, LLC
135 East Main, Suite A
Rexbur Idaho 83440
BOWEN APARTMENTS
REXBURG, IDAHO
Page 2
8/6/2002
Type
Fb psi
Fv psi
E psi
LVL
2600
285
1900000
GLB
2400
190
1800000
DF
1300
95
1900000
Beam 3
Window Headers
Type
DF
Fb psi
1300
Fv psi
95
E psi
1900000';
Span =
5:5 ft
Tributary Area =
.. 15
ft
Loads
Point Load =
0
Ibs
0
Snow
psf
Uniform Load =
0
Ibs/ft
Live Load 40? psf
600
Ibs/ft
Dead Load - ; 15 psf
225
Ibs/ft
Moment
Live Load Moment =
2269
lb-ft
=
27225
lb-in
Dead Load Moment =
851
lb-ft
=
10209
lb-in
Section Modulus Required
=
28.80
in3
Section Width = 4.5
in
Section Depth = 925
in.
Section Modulus Provided =
64.2
in3
OK
Moment of Ineritia Provided =
296.8
in4
Deflection
Live Load =
0.00
in.
L/360
0.18
in.
OK
Dead Load =
0.01
in.
Total =
0.01
in.
L/240
0.275
in.
OK
Horizontal Shear
fv =
82
psi
OK
FV =
95
psi
Allowable
Reaction =
2268.75
Ibs
Use
4.5
X
9.25
DF
Design Intelligence, LLC
135 East Main, Suite A
BOWEN APARTMENTS 8/6/2002
REXBURG, IDAHO
Page 3
Foundation Design
UBC 1997
(1500 psf increased for Depth)
30
34
18
Allowable Bearing Capacity
2000
psf
Max Roof Span =
ft
=
35,
80
15'
15
0
30
Max Floor Span =
ft
Snow Load
psf
Wall Height =
ft
Floor Live Load
psf
Stem Wall Height =
4
' _
ft
Wall Dead Load
psf
Stem Wall Width =
in.
Roof Dead Load
psf
Brick Dead Load
psf
Floor Dead Load
psf
(2 floors)
Exterior Bearing Walls
Proposed
Footing
Roof Loads
750
Ibs/ft
Width
24 in
Floor Loads
1650
Ibs/ft
Depth
10
in
Wall Load I
270
lbs/ft
Stem Wall Load
400
Ibs/ft
Footing Load
250
Ibs/ft
Total
3320
Ibs/ft
Bearing Pressure =
1660
psf
OK
Reinforcing Requirements
Min Reinforcing Factors
Footing
0.002
Stem Wall
Vertical
0.0012
#4
.... ...............................
0.2
Horizontal
0.002
Reinforcing Bar
in "in
Footing
Continuous Reinforcing Count
2
ba rs
Stem Wall
Continuous Reinforcing Count
4
bars
Vertical - Reinforcing Spacing
18
in
Design intelligence, LLC
135 East Main, Suite A
Rexb
BOWEN APARTMENTS
REXBURG, IDAHO
Page 1
8/6/2002
Shear Wall Analysis - Short Wall
Wind Load =
25.4 psf
Roof Height =
7.5 ft
Wall Height =
";16 ft
Length of Long Wali =
60
930
ft
Area at Mid Height of Wall =
ftA2
l
Wind Force =
23622
Ibs
80
Shear Wall Length
ft
Shear /ft in Wall @ Mid Height
295
Ibs/ft
Provide 112" APA rated sheathing with 8d nails n 4" o.c. at panel edges
and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required - UP TO SECOND FLOOR
I
Provide 112" APA rated sheathing with 8d nails @ 6" o.c. at panel edges
and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required - ABOVE SECOND FLOOR
Seismic Analysis
Seismic Multiplier =
0.164
Width
34
Length
64
Load
Weight
Roof Dead Load
24
(includes snow)
52224
Ibs
Long Wall Length 60 ft
Short Wall Length 30 ft
Height
Length
Load
Weight
Wall Dead Load
18
180
15
24300
Ibs
Seismic Force @ Mid Height of Wall
12550
Ibs
� 80
Shear Wall Length
ft
Shear per ft in Wall @ Mid Height
157
Ibs/ft
OK
Provide 112" APA rated sheathing with 8d nails @ 4" o.c. at panel edges
and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required - UP TO SECOND FLOOR
Provide 112" APA rated sheathing with 8d nails @ 6" o.c. at panel edges
and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required - ABOVE SECOND FLOOR
Design Intelligence, LLC
135 East Main, Suite A
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
BOWEN APARTMENTS 8/6/2002
REXBURG, IDAHO
Page 1
r
30'
1
-0"
60' 0"
4 PLEX
I- - - - - -- r o
EXIST NC POWER POLE
C)
fsi
1t
it fn
CI C 2i
el i E2
LESS:
35' -0"
20' -0"
h
CARB.
m r
I Z o 14.5'
41 I
NC
ry U
9.50 R0 M
0.48 ACRES MORE OR LESS
VIP MAW!
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
CE RECEPTACLE
f
e ft 10' MIN
1_
EXISTING
TRAILER
NEW 2" WATER SERVICE
I I
(/EW 6" , ANITAR}' SEWER
Ai 90 00 00 E 106.00'
EXISTING HOUSE
BO WEN APARTMENTS SITE PLAN
BECINING Al' A POINTI 1 RODS SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 45 OF
THE ORIGINAL REXBURC TOWNSITE, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO, AS PER THE RECORDED PLAT
THEREOF AND RUNNING THENCE EAST 12 RODS; THENCE SOUTH 9 RODS; THENCE WEST 12
RODS; THENCE NORTH 9 RODS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 BLOCK 45 OF THE ORIGINAL REXBURG
TOWNSITE, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO, AS PER THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF AND RUNNING
THENCE EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78.00 FEET; THENCE WEST 106.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 78.00 FEET TO THE PO /NT OF BEGINNING.
N 90 00 00 W 198.00'
SOW SIONAZ
NEW FIRE HYD
P/FOVID£ HANDICAPPED
�-- ACCESS TO SIDEWALK
30' -0"
3 PLEX with LAUNDRY
60' 0"
WATER RETENSION AREA
N 90 00 00 E 92.00'
5' SIDEWALK
10' -0"
20' -0"
1/"
ra
0
0
0
0
0
-03
Scale 1" = 20' -0"
BUILDING
2 STORIES = 7200 SF /6300 SF LIVING
CONSTRUCTION - TYPE V -N
NO FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
ONE FIRE WALLS BETWEEN EACH VERTICAL
DWELLING UNIT.
4. SETBACKS REQUIRED:
FRONT - 25 F7
SIDES - 6 F7 MIN
REAR - 20 FT
PARKING:
STREET ROW: 10 FT
ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE: 5 F7
FRONT OF BLDG: 5 FT
TOTAL AREA : 0.48 ACRES = 21135 SF
ASPHALT & BUILDING = 8500 SF
LANDSCAPING = 13093 SF = 62%
WATER RETENSION - NOT REQ'D
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. 2" WATER LINE - CLASS 51 DUCTILE IRON.
2. 6" SEWER LINE - ABS
3. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY WITH
REXBURC CITY STANDARDS.
4. APPROACHES SHALL BE 6" THICK AND
REINFORCED PER REXBURC CITY STD.
5. REINFORCE CURB AND GUTTER AT
APPROACHES AS REQ'D BY REXBURC CITY
STDS.
6. SEE SHEET C2 FOR CURB AND CUTTER
DETAILS.
7. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SLOPED 2%
FOR DRAINAGE.
VAJVC This Wo.kq is for this
location and customer orgy
5c),),yeV`- /
and a 00 to .t reuses in
.r
ny mono .shoal Design
written consent of ossg
BO
$ a TH il£87
DESIGN
INTELLIGENCE, LLC
.r OJT OW.. a.rs
r +w si- 'r - Pat rw u-s.r