HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO, APP & DOCS - 03-00021 - American Manor Apartments - RemodelBuilding Permit No:
CITY OF
REXBURG
AMERICA'S FAMILY COMMUNITY
R- o3 -o5 -o7
Applicable edition of code: ❑ International Building Code 2000
❑ International Residential Code 2000
❑ Uniform Building Code 1 997
Site address: American Manor -151 South 1st East
Use and occupancy: Apartments
Type of construction: Wood Frame
Design occupant load: Residential Units
Sprinkler System required: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Name and address of owner: Tamala Rencher
1748 Jeppson Ave
Idaho Falls, ID 83404
Contractor: Jim Mortensen
Special conditions:
Occupancy: ❑ Full
This Certificate, issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 of the
International Building Code, certifies that, at the time of issuance, this
building or that portion of the building that was inspected on the date listed
was found to be in compliance with the requirements of the code for the
group and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed
occupancy was classified.
Date: August 17, 2005
C.O. Issued by:
Y
Building Official
'UNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
19 E. Main (PO Box 280)
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
www. rexbu ro. oro
❑ Partial ❑ Temporary
Phone: 208- 359 -3020 x326
Fax: 208 - 359 -3024
cathyw@ci.rexburg.id.us
There shall be no future change in the existing occupancy classification of the building nor shall
any structural changes, modifications or additions be made to the building or any portion thereof
until the Building Official has reviewed and approved said future changes.
i
Plumbing Departure s _ Fire Department •�
State of Idaho Electrical Department - ( 08- 356 -483o) ❑ Merlin Webster
'd
The City of Rexburg certifies that this unit is approved for
occupancy until the date listed on this document.
Apartment
Address
Unit 1 Y
Numrbef of occupants 74
Date of inspection / 1) for 9 /1
Certificate
of
Occupancy
m
a
3
1,5 1 . . -.
S131 9NIN80IJ
p(W fl' - aun t•-ni wa..c►
90: t . 300 -0'_ -.111.1
VALUE
FEE PAID
BUILDING
INSPECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & ZONING
PAID CASH$
DATE
ADDRESS
a .
BUIL PERMIT APPLICA REXBURG, ID DATE A
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED
OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
OWNER
BUILDER
STRUCTURE:
*RESIDENCE
FOOTINGS
*CONCRETE
MASONRY
MASONRY Y
O OTHER
REMARKS:
" i i . /1 ' !'. JOB ADDRESS / " 1 j # n
r re. Kt ARCHITECT
0 NEW 0 REMODEL 0 ADDITION *REPAIR
0 COMM. 0 EDUCATIONAL 0 GOVT 0 RELIGIOUS 0 FENCE 0 PATIO
BASEMENT
r
PHONE
DESIGNER
0 RENEWAL U FIRE
0 CARPORT 0 GARAGE O AWNING
INSULATED
FOUNDATION
CRETE
MASONRY
0 OTHER
0 PARTIAL
la FULL
O
FLOORS
O WOOD
aaCONCRETE
0 OTHER
EXT. WALLS
WOOD
0 MASONRY '
O CONCRETE
0 VENEER
0 METAL
O STUCCO
INT. WALLS
0 WOOD
0 MASONRY
0 CONCRETE
a DRYWALL
0 PLASTER
O TILE
CEILING
❑
woo()
DRYWALL
PLASTER
0 TILE
0 ACOUSTIC
0 OPEN
ROOF
HEAT
MOIL OIL
0 COAL
0 FIREPLACE
❑ ELECTRIC
0 BUILT UP.
O WOOD SH.
COMP. SH.
0 TILE
0 ROLL ROOF.
This 0 METAL
permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Uniform Building Code and Zoning Regulations of Rexburg, and it is hereby agreed
that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specifications will be completed in accordance with the regulations
pertaining and applicable thereto: The issuance of the permit does not waive restrictive covenants.
I CEI WALLS
0 FLOORS
0 PERIMETER
Date of Application
OWNER
Name
Site Address
Mailing Address
City /State /Zip
Telephone/Fax/Mobile ,(Q g
CONTRACTOR
Name 47/'rrl /4"-10 r i xt' I,t.
Mailing Address r 'Ty �,�
City /State /Zip /q F 4k ,
Telephone/Fax/M
elephone/Fax/Mobile a Qg " 3 S °t e' e ° 7
PROJECT INFORMATION
Property Zone: ' .3
Circle One
Circle One
Circle One
'1 a /sc.
1s/
Commercial Edu
New House
Basement: None/
Will there be apartment? )4J
Total Estimated Cost
Si
Code
Zone
Building T
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF REXBURG, IDAHO
2 9 -- 63
IA.
Svµ /k / st ,E.gs f'
1C vE: 3(2 /5
Cfvty r
ture or Appl
PAID CASH $
CHECK$
MAY 8 2003
Is existing use compatible with zoning, (screening parking, etc)
When was this building last occupied I Amp-
Architect/ Engineer Firm i/',
�� ifftvif,4 Plan Name
Subdivision
DRPARTMENT APPROVAL
Lot Width
CITY OF REXBURG
6y9V
Permit No. K 3 " _ 07
.7 ' 4
Lot ,`q 3 Block . S0
Government Remodel Other
P*5' New Commercial
Commercial Other
If so, - how many units /S
Are you in a flood plain - l 0
Commercial Remodel
Other: None/ Patio/ Carport/ Awning N/A
Lot Square Footage
Square Feet /9 4V SO Garage Square Feet Number of Stories $ Height ..Building
What will structure be used for: Home Home Business
Building Permit Fees /
Plan Check Fees / 7 2
Plumbing Permit Fees
Digging Permit Fees
Water & Sewer Fees
Front Footage Fee
TOTAL S
!i s
SiDlature of Tnspector
Issued by
Excavation &
Earthwork:
Concrete: / Y , 4
Masonry: 4 ,
Roofing: N , A,
Insulation: e r ! ►� °+ a k-
Drywall: rY1 /Yip f J t k Sr b -�
Painting: V r` r r 1 ►
Floor Coverings: ,rr, wt
Plumbing:
Heating: s A
Electrical: ‘At of
Roof Trusses: /V 4
Floor / Ceiling Joists: 6, 44
Cabinets: .4
Siding /Exterior Trim: ..
Other: ,
SUBCONTRACTOR LIST
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
(Manufacturer or Supplier)
TO:
DATE:
I hereby request, pursuant to Idaho Code Section 9 -338, to examine and/or copy the following public records:
Nor ? Z Te %e ipt v
❑ These records specifically pertain to myself.
❑ I wish to merely examine these records.
I wish copies of these records.
Printed Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Signature:
REQUEST TO EXAMINE /COPY PUBLIC RECORDS
ki(
�L
C ,1412.1Avi Iu I) CD 5o J 2_2_
1 acknowledge my signatur- that e records sortght by this request will not be used
for a mailing list or teleph . e list 's set forth in Idaho Code Section 9 -348.
Please allow us ten working days to complete your request.
This request has been reviewed by city attorney on the day of . 200_. Said request is hereby:
❑ Approved
❑ Denied
City Attorney
Date:
t — ^L(,,, _ c i
To:
Planning Department
From:
- N i KtA hI 0 5
(\ m Property: i t ,t A OP\ aJul )
( ( 5, (5r ; +St t _6 E Zed
5o.
Kaxblf
Tel. No.:
Project No.
V7 07— (1 2t
Fax No.:
Please respond by Fax to Nova Consulting Group, Inc.
3979 East Arapahoe Road, Suite 100
Centennial, Colorado 80122
Phone: (303) 734 -0270 Fax: (303) 734 -0425
I.
What is the date of construction?
Name & Signature of Building Official/ Inspector
Title:
Request for Information
BUILDING/PLANNING DEPARTMENT
N
�
Consulting Group, Inc.
Nova Consulting Group, Inc. has been commissioned to conduct an environmental assessment on the above referenced property.
As part of our research and report compilation we seek public information from municipal agencies regarding compliance with
state and local codes. We would appreciate your response to the following documentation/information requests:
I et /5 — 247o (
2. What is the historical use of the property (prior to development)? ES 1 PE17Adt.
3. What is the current zoning? Mak .. tl. 1 s1c1el'i11I \
(AAv ��
4. Have there been any documented spills or releases associated with the property
1 &K
5. Are there any registered underground or aboveground tanks listed for the property? (4 N /
6. Have there been any solid or hazardous waste disposal facilities at the Site? uN /4
7. Are there any violations associated with the environmental integrity of the property? ti N K p i
Thank you for your assistance. Should you have any questions associated with providing the requested information,
please call me at the above number.
Note: Please contact us at the above numbers if you require any additional
information or require a fee to complete this inquiry.
Date:
'
t 3 1 loci)
To:
Inspections and Code
Enforcement Department
From:
PIA `lL
J
4 0 , et.")
Property:
H L .-
- A.
1iw.cif p �
V1
5
t 'c :r
1
Of
+ d-
) 2-5 E 2rA
,
R &xh■;.
Tel. No.:
Project No.
6 07 - 0 2
if
Fax No.:
Please respond by Fax to Nova Consulting Group, Inc.
3979 East Arapahoe Road, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80122
Phone: (303) 734 -0270 Fax: (303) 734 -0425
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Nova Consulting Group, Inc. has been commissioned to conduct a condition assessment survey on the above
referenced property. As part of our research and report compilation, we seek public information from
municipal agencies regarding compliance with state and local building codes. We would appreciate your
response to the following documentation/information requests:
.7)o#4 hlfelf 5.7 rs/N
1. What is the current use group?
2. What is the current construction classification? V 9
3. What is the seismic zone? U A C - 3 7 G 7)
4. What is the current applicable building code and date including amendments? 2003 ZB C
5. Does the Property have any material outstanding building code violations or notice of
deficiencies?
Yes ❑ No 4 If "Yes ", please fax copies.
6. Please fax a copy of the current certificate of occupancy. i CO` )% \ iS Qn 'lair?! Di
7. What is the flood zone? No7 /w 114,00
�olll�
Thank you for your assistance. Should you have any questions associated with providing the
requested information, please call me at the above number.
Name & Signature of Building Official/ Inspector
Title:
Note: Please contact us at the above numbers if you require any additional information or require a
fee to complete this inquiry.
Det er
i- ( - fl'j
To:
Planning Department
From:
. 44 Min 5
Property:
p �
rntr:r 6n 8ant i+f�r5
1 (5. 15r Edit 4. IrE 2.4
SO.
a) C b'r9
J
Tel. No.:
Project No.
5 07- (12.
Fai No.:
Date /Time: Feb. 5. 2007 1:05PM
File
No. Mode
* Memory TX Result Report ( Feb. 5. 2007 1:06PM ) * * *
Destination
3630 Memory TX 13037340425 P. 2 OK
Reason for error
E. 1) Hang up or 1 i ne fail
E. 3) No answer
E . 5 ) E x c e e d e d max. E - m a i l s i z e
Name & Signature of Building O9lolall Inspector
Tide:
Request for Information
BUILDING/PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page
Pg (s) Result Not Sent
E. 2) Busy
E. 4) No facs imi 1 e connect ion
Nova`
comwa glleimO.
Please respond by Fax to Nova Consulting Group, Inc.
3979 East Arapahoe Road, Suite 100
Centennial, Colorado 80122
Phone: (303) 734 -0270 Fax: (303) 734 -0425
Nov Conaalliog Group, Inc. has been commissioned to conduct on em rmmental amasmeot on the above rdereeced properly.
As port of oar research and report compilation we seek public fnformadan from musicipel agencies regarding oomphanoe with
state and local codes. We would appreciate yourrvspome to the following ddoeamentaUOnlloformoYm requests:
1. What is the date ofeonsbwctioa4 ............... 1 l � rP Zoo
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — .
2. What is the historical use of the property (prior to development)?....... ���,t f` ttof "�
,,,,,1,, t11
3. What Is the earrentmaing4...........» ...... ..........».... ......... ......_..._.IYN.GltItt f...DZY L' .•' A 1A �re&1
there 4. Haw ere ban any documented spills or releases assodated with theproperq T......M.csp!1M4 `M C)
5. Are there any registered underground or aboveg000d tanks listed for the p, operty?_cle
6. Have there been any mad or huardous waste disposal facilities at the Sim ? ................ ` Nom)
7. Are mere any violations associated with the environmental Integrity of the property........ u t5 tif**1
Thank you for your sadstauoe. Should you have any questions unseated with providing the requested information,
plasm call me at the above number.
Nolo Phase contact us at the above numbers if you require any additional
information or regaire a forte complete this iagniry.
1)
2)
P 1
Ms. Tamla Rencher
836 N Skyline Dr
Idaho Falls, Idaho
83402
Reference: Structural Deficiencies
Ms. Rencher
Pat Bragassa, P.E.
167 N 4800 E
Rigby, Id
83442
Per your request, I have inspected your apartment building located at 139 S 1 East in Rexburg,
Idaho, and have the following report.
The apartment complex is made up of several apartment buildings under the name "American
Manor Apartments ". The building subject of this report is the northwest most building of this
group. This building is currently under renovation. During this renovation, the city building
inspector has placed a stop work order or "red tag" on the work to address structural concerns
brought to his attention. The intent of this report is to address these concerns and provide a
structural evaluation of the facility for the building owner.
I inspected the building on 4/18 with the owner and contractor present and again by myself on
4/21.
The procedure and method used for this evaluation is based on inspection and detailed
calculations as needed. Building performance and response over its lifetime is given due
consideration. Material testing and Non - destructive Examination were not performed and the
condition assessment was based on visual inspection of the building components and its response
to the loads sustained over the years.
The building is a wood framed, three story structure with engineered trusses for the roof framing,
2x6 stud exterior walls, 2x12 floor joists and 8 "' thick reinforced concrete foundation. The
exterior stairs and walkways are constructed of 4 "thick corrugated decking and steel tube
framing.
The renovation work previously performed has exposed many areas within the building which
allows sufficient inspection to determine the general construction features of the building.
Inspection and Evaluation Summary:
The building was constructed in the late 1980's and shows the expected amount of usage and
wear for a college area apartment building. The overall construction quality of this building was
fairly poor.
1. Building Exterior: The tube steel framed columns supporting the stairs and walkways are
rusting and require maintenance. I recommend removing the rust and repainting to prevent
further deterioration. Several of these columns have been deformed due to water being
trapped inside and freezing. All columns that have been deformed in this manner should be
replaced. The tops of the columns should be capped and a means for the water to drain out
should be added. Many of the base plates anchoring the columns to the foundation are
missing nuts, are loose, or are missing bolts completely. The base plates without bolts should
be modified by drilling through the plates and into the concrete and installing W' diameter
Hilti Kwik Bolt II (or Equal) with a minimum embedment of 2 -1/2 ". Nuts should be added to
all bolts currently without them. This walkway and stair system is the means of egress from
this building in the event of an emergency, and it is therefore critical that a structural sound
support system be provided.
The building owner discussed the possibility of expanding the ground floor apartments out to the
existing concrete wall approximately 4 -ft from the currently wall. This existing concrete wall
is approximately 4 ft tall (varies), bears on a footing on rock and supports the front bearing
wall of the apartments above by beams and columns By expanding the ground floor out to
this wall and building a framed bearing wall, the structural integrity of the building would be
much stronger, by providing a better method of shear transfer and bearing. The columns
currently supporting the second floor wall provides questionable shear transfer to the
foundation. The 8" thick foundation wall is adequate for supporting this new bearing wall.
2. Roof Overhang at south east comer. It was noted by the owner of a potential problem with
the roof overhang at the south east comer of the building. The roof extend approximately 4 -ft
past the bearing wall in this location. An analysis determined that this indeed does overstress
the 2x6 truss tails that support this portion of the roof. A design of a type of support bracket
to correct this condition has been included with this report.
3. Exposed Foundation at southwest corner. A question was raised concerning the exposed
footing at this location causing frost heaving. Due to the elevation of bedrock in this area, it
is unlikely that heaving is possible, but cannot be ruled out. The expansion of the ground
floor bearing wall will correct this potential by enclosing and covering this portion of the
foundation.
4. Building Interior. There are many areas of shoddy construction within the building, many of
which the owner is already in the process of upgrading and correcting. Calculations were
performed to check the sizing of the major structural components such as joists, studs, floor
beams and trusses.
5. Roof Trusses. The roof trusses on the east side of the building appear to be of a unique design
and construction. Although questionable in appearance they were found to be adequate for
the loads and span.
6. Floor Joists: The living room portion of each of the second and third story apartments are
supported by 2x12 floor joists at 16 " on center spanning 19'2 ". Calculations show that for
this span these joist are overstressed for the design live load value of 40 psf. The 1.5 -inch
thick gypsum concrete floor deck adds greatly to the dead load contribution on these joists ,
but also help distribute loads and limits deflection, which is probably why the floor loading
has not shown up in a visible means such as ceiling cracks, or excessive deflections in the
floor. To correct this, a new 2x12 joist (No.2 or better) shall be added between every other
joist within the 19' span areas of the building (living rooms only). This will add 5 joists to
each room. The sheet rock should be removed and the joist jacked or otherwise fitted into
position to guarantee they will support the floor. This work may only need to be perfounied
on the third floor framing, as it appears the second floor framing is approximately 4 -ft shorter
due to the inset of the ground floor bearing wall. This was not visible during the inspection
and should be verified in the field.
7. Door Headers. The door framing is being modified to provide a break between the new
windows being installed and the door frame. This will also provide a better transfer of shear
forces in these walls. It is recommended that the header bear on a minimum of 1 -1/2" (1 stud)
and be tied to the adjacent headers or built up columns with Simpson tie plates. Although not
specifically required by code, this does help provide a continuous tie across these walls
weakened by the large openings.
Overall the building has many areas of poor quality construction and is need of substantial
renovation, but structurally has shown no significant indications of distress, or failure. The
building main structural components appear to have supported the imposed loads fairly well over
the years despite the construction appearance and I can see no reason for continued usage with
the specified modifications.
If there are any questions concerning this evaluation, or if at any time during the renovation
please contact me at 538 -7845.
Pat Bragass , P.E.
1\
(z t
31(0
A
/ - -
balk
f
, I N A 6 7 yt
1...-4..6 co, 4.1 r
, )
N
• - \,7"(-1/ 4 `
eir
k. 'CAP evAs
G4 3U pLf4.
L(A
SLO
N54) - sXi sT
RazESti- Pfrer
gs--4