Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBP, CO & DOCS - 03-00025 - Cambridge Court Apartments - Two Buildings 79 UnitsINSPECTION RECORD CITY OF REXBURG BUILDING DATE APPROVED NAME CULr PERMIT # R "b 3 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF: JOB ADDRESS: 1 �r � f , GENERAL CONTRACTOR: 10 b � tA C +`( -ay� � . This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in Building Code and Zoning Regulations of the City of Rexburg. It is specifically understood that this Permit does not allow any Variance to the regulations of the City of Rexburg Building or Zoning Codes unless specifically approved by the City Council and explained on the Building Permit Application as approved by the Building Inspector. Date Approved Issued B , Building Inspector THIS PERMIT MUST BE PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED AT THE BUILDING SITE THE BUILDING MAY NOT BE OCCUPIED OR USEDWITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. No work shall be done on any part of 1) Acomplete set of approved drawings along with permit must be kept on the the building beyond the point premises during construction. indicated in each successive 2) The permit will become null and void in the event of any deviation from the Inspection without approval.. No NOTICEI accepted drawings. structural framework of any part of the 3) No foundation, structural, electrical, nor plumbing work shall be concealed building or any underground work without approval. shall be covered or concealed without approval. 1st Layout ..................... 2nd Footing ................... 3rd Foundation .............. 4th Truss ....................... 5th Framing ................... r'R tvl.stxLrntlQV1 .. 6th Drywall .................... 7th Sidewalk ................. 8th Final ......................... 9th Occupancy .............. ELECTRICAL 1st Groundwork ............ 2nd Rough -in ................ 3rd Final ........................ PLUMBING 1 st Trench ..................... 2nd Service Connection 3rd Rough -in ................. 4th Heat Cable .............. 5th Final ........................ For Inspections Call 355 -3020 24 Hour Notice A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CAN NOT BE ISSUED PI TO FINAL ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING INSPECTIONS. 44� : t< CERTIFICATE OF D 3a3- tro, City of Rexl Department of Buildi v -D(v Building Permit No: R- 03 -o5 -18 Applicable edition of code: ❑ Internationai nuinuai g t, ❑ International Residential Code 2000 Site address: 419 West Main Street Use and occupancy: Residential Apartments (2 Buildings - 79 Units) Type of construction: Wood Frame Design occupant load: Family housing Sprinkler System required: ❑ Yes ❑ No Name and address of owner: Kensington Manor Apartments, LLC P.O. Box 455 Rexburg, Idaho 8344 Contractor: Kensington Manor Apartments, LLC Special conditions: Occupancy: ❑ Full ❑ Partial ❑ Temporary This Certif icate, issued pursuant to the requirements of Section zo9 of th International B u ilbing CA cert i fies that at the time of 1ssmance this 6 16ing or that portion of the 6ui[bi th was mspecteb on the bate tist was f ouna to 6e in comp[iance with the requirements o f the cote for the group and bivision of occu pancN and the use for whicb the proposeb occupancN was c(assi f ieb. Date: Novemb( C.O. Issued by: Building Official There shall be no future change in the existing occupancy classification of the building nor shall any structural changes, modifications or additions be made to the building or any portion thereof until the Building Offi ,'al has reviewed and approved said future changes. Water Department ����— g't Fir Department State of Idaho Electrical Department - (208 -356 -4830 ) El Merlin Webster BULL PERMIT APPLICA REXBURG, DATE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER JOB ADDRESS PHONE BUILDER ARCHITECT DESIGNER STRUCTURE: LI NEW 0 REMODEL 0 ADDITION 0 REPAIR O RENEWAL 0 FIRE DAMAGE 0 RESIDENCE CKCOMM. 0 EDUCATIONAL 0 GOVT 0 RELIGIOUS 0 FENCE 0 PATIO O CARPORT [ GARAGE 0 AWNING FOOTINGS FOUNDATION BASEMENT FLOORS EXTT, WALLS INT. WALLS CEILING ROOF HEAT INSULATED O CONCRETE Q CONCRETE O PARTIAL 0 WOOD 0 WOOD . 0 WOOD 0 WOOD 0 BUILT UP. (j ,GAS [ WALLS 0 MASONRY 0 MASONRY 0 FULL Q CONCRETE 0 MASONRY ' 0 MASONRY 0 DRYWALL 0 WOOD SH. QOIL 0 CEILING O OTHER 0 OTHER O.NO 0 OTHER 0 CONCRETE 0 CONCRETE 0 PLASTER 3„00MP. SH. 0 COAL [ FLOORS 0 VENEER Cl DRYWALL 0 TILE 0 TILE 0 FIREPLACE [,PERIMETER 0 METAL 0 PLASTER 0 ACOUSTIC O ROLL ROOF. 0 ELECTRIC 0 STUCCO O TILE 0 OPEN 0 METAL This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Uniforrn Building Code and Zoning Regulations of Rexburg, and it is hereby agreed that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specifications will be completed in accordance with the regulations pertaining and applicable thereto: The issuance of the permit does not waive REMARKS: CAN DEPAR TMENT O_ F BUILDING & ZONING VALUE "� 4 5 FEE PAID _ _ C BUILDING Cwy W DgWUnenrs Copy PINK— Assessor's Copy GOLDENROD•Insper,KOr APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 5 CITY OF REXi3IMG, II3AH0 Date of Application Pe rrmt Na. � -� � /� OWNER Mai ling Address City /State /Zip _ loo T-p 9Z4 Telephone/Fax/Mobile 35 - LSV00A CONTRACTOR Name City /S1 "etephone /Fax/Mobile -400 - F I> 6 / U PROJECT INFORMATION DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Property Zone: Is existing use compatible with zoning, (screening parking, etc) When was this building last occupied Architect/ Engineer Firm ll'� ►��.��� An�S . T �t- Q Plan Name _ Subdivision Lot Block . Circle One Residential Commercial Educational Government Remodel Other Circle One New House Addition/Remodel to House - ew Commercial Commercial Remodel Circle One Basemen on Finished / Unfinished Other: one/ Patio/ Carport/ Awning N/A Lot Square Footage ( Lot Width ` X 3 Square Feet Garage Square Feet Nlpt Number of Stories-,3-'Height of Building aK What will swused for: Home Home Business Apartment Commercial Other Will there be an apartment? If so, how many units 19 Total Estimated Cost you in a flood plain Signature of Applicant Code Building ermit Fees C 0-63 g _� . � ss P s Zone us� PIan Check Fees Building Type Plumbing Permit Fees Digging Permit Fees q�. Water & Sewer Fees PA1D C H $ C Front Footage Fee r\ TOTAL 7 3 , 0 Signature of Inspector Issued by CITY OF REXBURG eptic Tank APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT Fixtures OWNER FEES nr Name Plumbing Permit • • • • • • • ... • ...... $ �i ... Address - T e l, Sewer Inspection .................... $ Lot jq Blk. 1' ^t - ,Add. Inspection of Pipe .................. • - $ Inspection of Fixtures • • . • ...... • .. $ PLUMBER _ Name. lam � „ (�"� =� Address Tel. $ NATURE OF INSTALLATION TOTAL $, ��e Received: Date Lawn Sprinklers Rough Plumbing eptic Tank Fixtures erPiping nr Complete Sewer By INSPECTOR'S RECORD N DESCRIPTION OF WORK Bath Tubs Urinal Showers Sink Trap nr Laundry Trays Water Heater Wash Basin Other Toilet Stop Sinks C Kitchen Sinks` Floor Drain Drinking Fountains Lawn Sprinklers Water Softeners Dish Washing Mach. Clothes Washer MAY 2 0 2003 CASH $ s ;FlE CIC$ Ro Plumbing Se wer Other Finish Plumbing S INSP. NAME SUBCONTRACTOR LIST Excavation & Earthwork: S �` Concrete: �C Lj Masonry: ZY .5 Mrs Roofing: 1riPb K H0 IVLAOM j&Ut,45 Insulation: Drywall: Ot�t Sa�v�z �vwac �r.�� �2 wic��_ Painting: Floor Coverings: 0mil . Poor Cow¢, k. . Plumbing: M per) VIVMbiv Heating Electrical: SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (Manufacturer or Supplier) Roof Trusses: Floor / Ceiling Joists: Cabinets: gh � (2&6 Siding /Exterior Trim: Other: SAINSB URY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 4829 N. HAROLDSENDR. IDAHO FALLS, ID. 83401 (208) 529 -4510 (208) 552 -5745 FAX Date: 4 -30 -03 Val Christensen 12 N. Center Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Dear Val, This letter is in regards to the Cambridge Court Apartment Project at 421 W. Main. It is my understanding that Chris (Rexburg Fire Marshall) wants us to sprinkle the attic on East building on our project. It is also my understanding that you need this in writing. This is meant to resolve the issue of the Fire department needing to be within the 150' access requirement. I'll sprinkle the attic to resolve this issue but I am doing so under protest. I believe that the access from 0' West more than satisfy's the requirement. This will upgrade our fire protection system from a 13R to a 13. // Sincerely, C. Thomas President REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL BUILDING PERMIT FOR PARTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO: Building Official for the City of Rexburg Pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Building Code, the undersigned requests that a building permit be issued for: Footings and Foundations only at: Sainsbury Construction Company, Inc. 421 West Main (Cambridge Court) Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Acknowledgment is made that the plans for the complex are not complete and that final approval of the building will not be given until the final plans have been approved. We recognize that proceeding with partial construction at this time is entirely at the risk of the Architect/Owner with there being no assurance that the final Certificate of Occupancy for the entire building or structure will be granted. We further absolve the City of Rexburg and officers and employees thereof, of all responsibility for the issuance of a partial permit and further agree that any work performed under this permit will be removed or otherwise corrected to be in accord with the requirements of the final approved plans when a permit for the entire building or structure is finally granted. Dated: March 24, 2003 l' By .'/a� Vern Muir�� y , (Project Manager) / Approved: 24 March 2003 CI1 LM MEMO: To: Larry Hudson, Mountain River Engineering Val Christensen Re: Review of �. From: John Millar Comments: 1. Provide Copies of Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) permits or permit applications for the construction into Highway 33 and for the two (2) new approaches. 2. Approaches on to Highway 33 must be constructed as per ITD standards, attached. 3. Need detail on how island is to be constructed and landscaped. Bottom area of the island may turn into wet land. The island may require sodding. 4. Need to submit storm drain calculations for piping, grate capacity, storage capacity of island, etc. 5. The trees that were removed along Main St. Must be replaced. 6. French drain not allowed - see attached detail on manhole that is required for cleaning of wastewater. 7. The Division of Environmental Quality will need to approve the plans and specifications for the extension of the sewer line as shown on the plans. The will also need to approve the storm drainage plan. Sent By: DESIGN INTELLIGENCE; De Zift n eeffigence, LLB' Struedural Enghteefing 3685 w,fwy 33 .Rexburg, Idaho 834dd 12083590740; Date: May 14, 2403 To: John Berry City of Rexburg Building Inspector Subject: Dear Mr. Berry, May -14 -03 3:42AM; Call: (208)-3591440 FAX (208) 359-07411 Page The interior footin shown on the schedule and drawings as F2 has been.re.duced to a 16x.10— cotitinuius footing with (2) #4 continuous. This change is reflects the fact that the parity wall no longer carries the floor joist load. Please call me if you have any questions. Respectfully, Scott A Spaulding, P.B. Design Intelligence, L Sent By: DESIGN INTELLIGENCE; 12083590740; May -29 -03 2:53AM; Page 2/5 De l i t n eellig en ce LL C S' trucdarral,engin ing 30S W H.wy 33 ResbkFj, Idaho 83440 Date: May 29, 2003 To: Val Christensen City of Rexburg Building Inspector Subject:. Court Apartments Dear Mr. Christensen: CAN: (2 359-.146.1 FAX. (208) 359- -0740 The contractor asked if it is possible to stop the shear wall at the bathrooms as the sheathing complicates the plumbing. I have checked the calculations (included) and found this to be acceptable. Further, beam WB2 has been reduced to (2) DF 2x 10 since the greater part of that beam has been replaced by a bearing wall. Finally, some anchor bolts were intentionally left out of the foundation when it was poured. 'These shal I be replaced with 5/8" epoxy anchors with 7" embedment. Please call the if you have any questions. Respectfully, Scott A Spaul it P.E. j� Design Intelligence, LLC 446$ �0Ft� F4 / 0 -Z, Sent By: DESIGN INTELLIGENCE; Des Intelligence, LLC 3686'W Hwy 33 Rexburu. Idaho 83440 12083590740; CAMBR COURT REXSURG, IDAHO SAINSBU'RY CoNS7R May -29 -03 2:53AM; i".VL 2ti0o 285 .... 1900 000 — ..... GLB_�` 2400 190 .... 1800 000 1300 ... —.... 95 .....? 900 .....— .......— ..... —_ ...— ....- ...... --.. —... Beam 2 Floor StJ rt — —. . — "— . —. _ .(r Psi Fv psl E —.... —... — .. — .... — ... �: iStiu''^ hi71 '' r��; , ,`:,I� ,, : ..,..: I ,. .r.rri ,F�;;1,f, "•'`'P(4'' �, ^ "' ISt;;d£� ._.- .... -.... .....- .... �1' �... �. r. Y( .i y,i�:,.t... TS��' II'��9 ,'Fx��v �� •• .... .... ....- , 1 � . t, � v ,�.... ..... .... —..._ k Load now tary Area —, — ..... —.. ...... S 4l - -- —' . . —.. p Unrform L - • .Sf oad Ik Load _ Lure 0 72 1b3fft Dead Sf Moment � �..... ...._. — '01 L ive Load Moment � 99 8 1b -f# ..— —. .... — ... — = 1 -In C)e L oad Mo ment = . 374 lb -ft —.... ...... 4191 lb S ectio n Mod l R e wired ... ... coon Width . -� � " — —' • d m ..... (SCtI .. — ors Modu P mm 42.8 in3 _ 1 of Ine Provid ®d = 197".9 in4 I. e ctlorl —. -- ... Live Load — — — 0 .04 in. L/36 0. 11 in. 4K ©ead... = 0.00 J T otal = 0. in_ L124 0.1 Horiz ontal She — - n. OK fv _ —.... 89 psi —...._ OK 95 Allo wable Reaction 16 d$.315 .25 © l . r - -- - - -- .... .....�.. ..... — 1 _ —..... .._ :....— ...... Us e............ � ....- X _9 -.. �..... .. - -.-1 Page 3/5 5/29/2003 Page 2 Sent By: DESIGN INTELLIGENCE; 12083590740; May -29 -03 2:54AM; Page 4/5 Design inteiiigenCe, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 5129/2M3 3685 W Hwy 33 PF)CA1114n. imAWn Page 1.. I Sent By: DESIGN INTELLIGENCE; Dei;16 - Intelligence, LLC 3698.W'HwY 33 12083590740; May-29-03 2:54AM; Page 5/5 CAMMObt-edURT ed r �L x CCU �1.(G STATE OF IDAHO www.ci.rexburg.id.us P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fax (208) 359 -3022 e -mail rexburg@ci.rexburg.id.us 11/12/2003 Tom Sainsbury Sainsbury Construction 4829 Flaroldsen Drive Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Dear Tom, I received your letter dated 11 -10 -03 concerning the digout Apartments. The letter addresses two discrepancies at the Cambridge project. It also suggests that non - compliance to construction requirements should not "be used as an excuse to withhold occupancy" on the project. I need to make it very clear to you that we are not looking to withhold occupancy on your project. We work with you to make sure that all building codes, ordinances and Federal Laws are complied with. We need to work together to remedy the two discrepancies identified in your letter. The first problem is the sidewalk issue. I will get with John Millar concerning how the City of Rexburg will address their portion of the problem. The bridge has obviously settled on one side. If and when it is repaired, I doubt that it will be lowered. It seems to me that if any repairs were made, it would be raised back to its original position. The fact that your Engineer disregarded the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does not make the problem go away and does not relieve you as the Developer of responsibility. I appreciate your willingness to raise the sidewalk that you recently installed so that ADA requirements can be met. The second problem is the occupancy issue. Chris Huskinson (Fire Department Inspector) and I had performed life safety inspections on the apartments for the units at the south stairwell only. There was at least one of these units that was prematurely occupied and therefore not inspected. It is the one 1 that still has not had its kitchen fixed t^ Li VV Th e " LLn1 t hLL ' t yVU Jay �Y. Y"° 111Jyected 1 -Y A. 11{.KL L V Lh VL11 LL o lowered. There is absolutely no way that we had given you the go ahead to occupy. In fact you were negligent once again last Friday when we were doing finals on the north end units. I was assured that no one had moved into any of the units that I was inspecting. On the top floor I walked into a unit without furniture in the living room, said hello to a couple who were standing by the sink, thinking they were the cleaning crew and then proceeded to the bedroom before 1 noticed that they were living there. At your prior project University Courtyard I experienced the same problems. I showed up to do an inspection and was greeted by a fellow who informed me that he and a few others had moved into the southeastern building. The parking lot did not exist and we had numerous inspection items that had not been completed. Besides we had not been called at all for any occupancy inspections. Occupancy without an inspection is only one of the problems that I have encountered on your projects. During the past two projects you have taken it upon yourself to disregard the building plans and not inform this office. At University Courtyard Apartments the closets containing the water heaters were not built and a combined coat and mechanical closet were created. Our department was not notified and the result caused the Plumbing Inspector, Fire Inspector and the Building Department all kinds of problems helping you find a solution. During the construction of University Courtyard Apartments, you decided to change the elevations of the buildings and leave out the handicapped accessible access to the public right -of -way. Both of these items were on the approved set of building plans. Once again we were not informed of the changes and the result was a great deal of additional work for both the inspectors and your employees. At Cambridge Court you made the decision to change the kitchens without notifying us of the change. The result was once again out of code noncompliance and extra work and trouble was generated for all. I have on many occasions instructed Ryan, Vern and Larry that I won't allow any occupancy in units where work is still being performed and that it is paramount that the general public be separated from the construction workers. Can you imagine what a judge would say to me if one of these renters was hurt as the result of construction activity? He would point to me and ask why I allowed occupancy. Those involved would run for cover leaving me holding the bag. As for moving people into dwelling units that have not been inspected and approved for occupancy, this practice must cease. From this point on it will be our procedure, to walk away from any unit that is illegally occupied and not perform any inspections. The unit must be cleared of tenants and possessions before any further inspections will be performed. If the tenants do not leave with their possessions, then an enforcement officer will be called and the unit will be cleared. Fines and other penalties will be issued. That being said, we need to work together to come to some solutions. We will still work with you to get units acceptable for occupancy without having the entire building or project complete. If we haven't inspected the units for a temporary final, don't move in the tenants. Please don't make any changes to the approved set of building plans without letting us know. The code requires that you inform us in writing of all changes from the plans. If the change seems insignificant, we probably do not need new drawings and a call may be all that is needed. I hope that this letter will be viewed in the spirit of co- operation. We are looking f�n rrl ��snr�rinn ­14+11 4 n 1..,,,. + --- T —+ 1� «—. 'CT L. C L_ —L.__ u vaauaa� rruai J%J" ivi "1V11r,. LILI'V. La:L 111E Auvw '111 can UG Vi miy 1u1111m assistance. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 324. Sincerely, Val Christensen Building Official Cc: John Millar Stephen Zollinger Chris Huskinson SAINSBURY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 4697N. HAROLDSENDR. IDAHO FALLS, ID. 83401 (208) 529 -4510 (208) 552 -5745 FAX Date: l 1 -10 -03 Val Christensen City Hall 12 N. Center Rexburg, Id. 83440 Dear Val, A couple of items have come to my attention concerning Cambridge Court Apartments. One is the issue with the City's bridge across the canal. As you are aware the bridge is severely out of level. It is also not on our property. The City poured the connecting piece between my property and the bridge. This section of concrete is too steep. This section of concrete is also not on our property. It looks to me that if the bridge was fixed and leveled to the lower side then the city's section of concrete could be re- poured and would meet code. I am not sure how any of this is our responsibility. Our concrete is poured according the site plan prepared by Mountain River Engineering and submitted to the city. However If the city corrects the bridge and the section of concrete between our property. I will cut a section of our sidewalk back and ramp to connect as necessary. This however should not be used as an excuse to withhold occupancy on our building. There are some units that are occupied in Cambridge Court that have already been inspected. Vern and Larry have informed me that you want to go back through these units again. I see no reason for this. You inspected these and gave us permission to occupy. I do not want the responsibility and I am sure you don't of having these tenants leave their apartments without them there. Next thing you know we will have someone claiming some things missing or damaged. I am aware that there are 5 units that are occupied that need thermostats lowered and vinyl under the doors. I am sure that Chris has already let you know that light fixtures are not classified as an obstruction in the code. This eliminates the issue of moving any light fixtures. We have already lowered the thermostats in these units and made appointments starting today to install the vinyl. If there are any other issue's I will take responsibility for ±here being co::upleted in a':y o f *k'�P occ'apued'.u�:rts. please cont� ^* if t ^u T -- 44 ^r� 4V1 111 , V KY V arly liKes �1V1.S. Sincerely, C. Thomas Sam President e d y ollexlur STATE OF IDAHO www.ci.rexburgJd.us P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fax (208) 359 -3022 e -mail rexburg @ci.rexburg.id.us 5/19/2003 Scott Spaulding Design Intelligence 3685 E Hwy. 33 Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Dear Scott, I have finished the review of the Sainsbury Construction Cambridge Court Apartment drawings that you have provided for me and have identified the following discrepancies: 1. The stair enclosures must be open on one side as per the definition of exterior stairway as defined in Section 1002 of the 2000 International Building Code (IBC). The exterior doors of the units must be 20 minute rated doors and assemblies. 2. Be aware that plumbing in party walls can cause many problems with the integrity of fire walls. Plastic pipes can not penetrate the membrane of the 1- hour firewall unless they arc properly constructed to do so. Special fire resistive rings are required or special details that show metal parts entering the membrane and all plastic remaining within the wall. The unit separation walls must be built continuous from the foundation to the roof sheathing. We have details for many different options that I can provide for you if you want to come down to the office. 3. The door into the bathroom on a "Type B" adaptable unit can not open into the space in front of the bathtub. The bathroom that you used to create the existing design has a wall hung sink that allows a wheel chair to move under it. The current configuration will not allow a space large enough so that a person in a wheelchair would have room to close the door. I have attached a drawing to the back ofthis document that identifies how the door must not swing into the space in front - of the tub. 4. "Type A" accessible units are required to have lowered work and sink areas in the kitchens. 5. The footings which were poured previously are not 36" below grade. Please provide a detail showing how the error can be fixed. 6. Bolts were left out for shear walls and bearing walls when the slab was poured. Please identify how to connect these walls. Under some of these walls there is only 4" of concrete. 7. The Fire Department has reviewed the plans. I have attached a copy of there report. Please provide the necessary information they have requested. Please return two sets of revised plans. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 324. Sincerely, Val Christensen Building Official cc John Millar Chris Huskinson t USABLE KITCHENS AND BATHROOMS ■ PART B: USABLE BATHROOMS "B" Bathroom with Bathtub Only 19 inches of the required 30 -inch x 48 -inch clear floor space can go under a lavatory. A deeper lavatory would require that the clear floor space be positioned away from the plumbing wall and closer to the tub, causing it to overlap with the door swing. If a deeper lavatory is desired the room must be lengthene' 19" maximum c wallhung lavato with knee span clear floor space for maneuvering outside swing of door Ve not required, access improved if door swings rt and an auxiliary door rndle is installed S Co�/�l�l�lgv ASS reinforcing in walls or min. clear floor space ,--- _______- min. clear floor space Legend: <`•::: :: ::::: floors for rab bars \ g ����, at each fixture ! ----------- outside swing of door . ri y 7.67 USABLE KITCHENS AND BATHROOMS ■ PART B: USABLE BATHROOMS i reinforced wall areas for future installation of grab bars around toilet and bathtub additional inaccessible receptacle permitted receptacle required in an accessible location lever han dies — not required, but recommended I fl specifically designated clear floor space at bath- tub allows greater access to the bathtub and its controls, see page 7.55 / r � fixed base cabinet acceptable since parallel approach centered on basin is possible 30" X 48" clear floor space for parallel approach i Example "B" Bathroom Greater Access to Bathtub 6' -10" X 7'- 9" (Similar to Plan on Page 7.67) r H um, � \ 1 / y Z clear floor space at each fixture required — 30" X 48" min. clear floor space outside swing of door required Notes in italic type are recommendations only and are not required by the Guidelines. 7.37 Y,T I � REXBURG MADISON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 280 26 North Center Rexburg, Idaho 83440 (2 08) 359 -3 010 1997 Uniform Fire Code Plan Date: 7 -1 -02 Plan Review Review Date: 4 -22 -03 Building Name: CELESTIAL VILLAGE APARTMENTS Building Address: PORTER ROAD AND CASPER AVENUE Stories: 2.5 Type of Construction: V -I Occupancy Classification: R -1 Existing Floor Area: N/A New Construction Floor Area: APPROXIMATELY 7200 SQUARE FEET /BUILDING 1).Required Fire Flow (Appendix III -A): 2250 GPM /TWO HOURS Comments: FIRE FLOW MAY BE REDUCED UP TO 50 PERCENT IF BUILDINGS ARE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 2).Water Supply (Article 9, Section 903) Required: YES Fire Hydrant Location: TWO WITHIN COMPLEX Fire Hydrant Flows: UNKNOWN Fire Flow Test Location: N/A Fire Flow Supplied By: NOT SHOWN Other Approved Water Source: NONE Water Supply Acceptable: SEE COMMENTS Fire Hydrant Location Acceptable: SEE COMMENTS Water Supply Comments: PLANS INDICATE TWO HYDRANTS WITHIN COMPLEX. ONE ADDITIONAL HYDRANT IS REQUIRED. FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE WITHIN 450 FEET OF BUILDINGS. FD REQUESTS HYDRANT FLOW FROM THE ENGINEERS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR VERIFICATION. 3.)Fire Apparatus Access Roads (Article 9 Section 902) Required: YES Acceptable: Width: YES Length: YES Surface: YES Turning Radius: Grade: Vehicle Vertical: 7 r Clearance: Turn Arounds: Complete Road Acceptable: YES Comments: A MEANS TO TURN AROUND A FIRE APPARTUS IS REQUIRED. 4).Access Roads and Water Supply, Including Fire Hydrants Are Required To Be Installed And Made Serviceable Prior To And During Time Of Construction (Article 9 Section 901.3): YES Comments: IF NOT INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION A STOP WORK ORDER WILL BE ISSUED. 5),Installation Of Portable Fire Extinguisher (Article 10 Section 1002) Required: YES Location Acceptable: NOT SHOWN Type Provided Acceptable: NEED TO PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 2A10BC EXTINGUISHER PER UNIT. Comments: 6).Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems: (Article 10 Section 1003 Required: NO Type Of System Being Installed: Sprinkler System Monitoring Required (Article 10 Section 1003.3) Required: NO Comments: 7).Standpipes (Article 10 Section 1004) Required: NO Type Required: Comments: 8) Ventilating Hood And Duct Fire Extinguishing System (Article 10 Section 1006.2) Required: NO Type Being Provided: Automatic Fuel Shutoff Shown (Article 10 Section 1006.2.4): Portable Fire Extinguisher Shown (Article 10 section 1006.2.7): Comments: 9).Fire Alarm Systems (Article 10 Section 1007)Required: YES Type Of System Required: Manual: Automatic: Both: Type Of System Being Provided: Manual: Automatic: Both: Components Of System Shown: Smoke Detectors: X Heat Detectors: Manual Pull Station: Sounding Devices: Visual Devices: A L Door Holders: Duct Detectors: Flow Alarm: Sprinkler Valve Monitoring: Comments: ALL COMMON AREAS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE DETECTORS INCLUDING LAUNDRY AREA IN ADDITON TO BEDROOMS AND CORRIDORS ADJANCENT TO BEDROOMS. HANDICAPPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH HORN /STROBE UNITS AS PER FIRE CODE AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. 10).Other Corrections That Are Required By Special Occupancy Or Conditions: NO Plans As Submitted Are Acceptable: YES, WITH COMMENTS ADDRESSED k Plans Checked By: CHRIS HUSKINSON Date- 4 -22 -ni Please furnish comments back to the plan reviewer in the following manner: Written Comments: New Plans: UaC �O = : o Cil y U n a ISHE STATE OF IDAHO P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fax (208) 359 -3022 e -mail rexburg@srv.net REXBURG M4DISON COUNTY EMERGENCYSER VICES 26 NORTH CENTER STREET REXBURG, IDAHO 83440 208- 359 -3010 208 -359 -3006 FAX 2000 International Fire Code Plan Review Plan Date: 4 -14 -03 Review Date: 5 -4-03 Building Name: CAMBRIDGE COURT APARTMENTS Building Address: CORNER OF MAIN STREET AND FOURTH WEST Stories: THREE Type of Construction: V -B Occupancy Classification: R-2 Existing Floor Area: N/A New Construction Floor Area: APPROXIMATELY 57,000 TOTAL SQ. FEET 1. Required Fire Flow (Appendix B): 4,500 GPM/FOUR HOURS Comments: REQUIRED FIRE FLOW MAY BE REDUCE BY 50% WHEN BUILDINGS ARE EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. (REQUIRED FLOW WOULD BE 2,250 GPM) 2- Water Supply (Section 508, Appendix C) Required: YES Fire Hydrant Location: FOURTH WEST AND MAIN STREET Fire Hydrant Flows: OK Fire Test Location: FOURTH WEST AND MAIN STREET Fire Flow Supplied By: FD Other Approved Water Source: NONE Water Supply Acceptable: NO Fire Hydrant Location Acceptable: SEE COMMENTS Water Supply Comments: PLANS SUBMITTED DO NOT SHOW FIRE HYDRANT ON SITE. A MINIMUM OF ONE HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. 3. Fire Apparatus Access Roads (Section 503, Appendix D) Required: YES Acceptable Width: YES Length: YES Surface: YES Complete Road Acceptable: NO, SEE COMMENTS Comments: BUILDER HAS NOT SUBMITTED PLANS FOR REQUIRED ACCESS TO ENTIRE BUILDINGS. REVIEWER UNSURE IF PROJECT WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL ACCESS OR BE COMPENSATED FOR BY SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 4. Access Roads and Water Supply, including fire hydrants are required to be installed and made serviceable prior to and during time of construction (Section 501): Comments: IF NOT INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND MADE OPERATIONAL, A STOP WORK ORDER WILL BE ISSUED. 5. Installation of portable fire extinguishers (Section 906) Required: YES Location shown: YES Type provided acceptable: YES, 2A -10BC Comments: LOCATION OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER NOT ACCEPTABLE. LOCATION PUTS THEM UNDER CABINETS IN KITCHEN. FIRE EXTINGUISHER MUST HAVE CLEAR AND UN- IMPEDED ACCESS. 6. Automatic fire extinguishing systems (Section 903) Required: YES Type of system being installed: UNKNOWN Sprinkler system monitoring (Section 907) required: YES Comments: SEE SECTION #9. 7. Standpipes (Section 905) required: NO Type required: Comments: 8. Ventilating hood and duct fire extinguisher system (Section 509) required: Type being provided: Automatic fuel shut -off required: Portable fire extinguisher shown: Comments: 9. Fire alarm systems (Section 907) required: YES Type of system required: Manual: Automatic: Both: X Type of system being provided: Manual: Automatic: Both: Components of system shown: Smoke Detectors: X Heat Detectors: Manual Pull Station: Sounding Devices: Visual Devices: Door Holders: Duct Detectors: Flow Alarm: Sprinkler Valve Monitoring: Fire Alarm System Acceptable: NO, PLANS NOT SUBMITTED FOR ALARM SYSTEM. SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDE LOCATIONS OF ALARM - INITIATING AND NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES, ALARM CONTROL AND TROUBLE SIGNALING EQUIPMENT, ANNUNCIATION, POWER CONNECTION, BATTERY CALCULATIONS, CONDUCTOR TYPE AND SIZES, VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS, MANUFACTURERS, MODEL NUMBERS AND LISTING INFORMATION FOR EQUIPMENT, DEVICES AND MATIERIALS, AND INTERFACE OF FIRE SAFETY CONTROL FUNCTIONS. 10. Other corrections that are required by special occupancy or conditions: SEE ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS Plans as submitted are acceptable: NO Plans checked by: CHRIS HUSIONSON Date: 5-4 -03 Please fiunish comments back to the plan reviewer in the following manner: Written Comments: X New Plans: X U o ��FJ� RG�O c ify S � g etIsHEO STATE OF IDAHO P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fax (208) 359 -3022 e -mail rexburg@srv.net MEMO: TO: TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: CHRIS HUSKINSON, FIRE INSPECTOR DATE: MAY 5, 2003 RE: CAMBRIDGE COURT APARTMENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Upon review of the site plan drawings submitted the following items need to be addressed: WATER SUPPLY: The proposed hydrant located on the property, in addition to existing hydrants, will suffice for this project as long as it meets the minimum flow requirements of 2,250GPWtwo hours and the entire project is fire sprinklered. Additional plans are required to complete an accurate plan review of this project in regard to access, fire alarms, and fire suppression systems. If there are any questions please feel free to contact me. C I"i Chris Huskinson Fire Inspector Design Intelligence, LLC Engineering Calculations Summary Date: Apri129, 2003 Subject: Cambridge Court, Rexburg, Idaho Customer: Sainsbury Construction This analysis uses the Design Criteria required by the local jurisdiction and the IBC 2000 as the basis for the calculations. Materials: Dimensional Lumber — NDS 1997 design values Concrete: 2500 psi @ 28 days Reinforcing Steel - #4 and smaller Grade 40, #5 and larger Grade 60 Assumptions: IBC 2000 — Foundations designed for Max Brg Pressure of 1500 psf increased for depth Design Loads: Roof Live Load (min) — 20 psf during construction Ground Snow load = 50 psf, Roof Snow load= 35 psf Snow Load Importance Factor — 1.0 Snow Exposure Factor — 0.9 Wind = 90 mph, Exposure B Wind Importance Factor — 1.0 Wind Exposure = B Seismic Design Category — D 1 Seismic Use Group - 1 References: IBC 2000 TrusJoist MacMillian Design Guides Summary: All beam sizes and footing sizes are noted on the drawings 4468 These calculations and included details are for this location and customer only and not to be reused in any manner without the written consent of Design Intelligence. Designed By • cott A Spaulding, P.E. Checked By: Date: I Date: 0 CAMBRIDGE COURT Date and Time: 4/29/2003 11:51:32 AM MCE Parameters - Conterminous 48 States Zip Code - 83440 Central Latitude = 43.763462 Central Longitude = - 111.609017 Data are based on the 0.10 deg grid set Period SA (sec) ( %g) 0.2 060.6 Map Value, Soil Factor of 1.0 1.0 019.3 Map Value, Soil Factor of 1.0 MCE Parameters x Specified Soil Factors 0.2 080.0 Soil Factor of 1.32 1.0 039.2 Soil Factor of 2.03 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Design P aram ete rs 35 Snow Load: psf Sno Load Rise Roof Pitch 3 Roof Pitch 4 Roof Pitch 6 Roof Pitch 7 Roof Pitch 8 Roof Pitch 10 Roof Pitch 12 Run R_ edu ction 12 0.0 12 0.0 12 2.5 12 3.8 12 5.1 12 7.4 12 9.4 Use psf 35.0 psf psf 35.0 psf psf 32.5 psf psf 31.2 psf psf _ 29.9 psf psf 27.6 psf psf 25.6 psf Wind Design Wind Speed 90 mph Importance Factor 1' Exposure 6 Simplified Method Section 1609.6 Applicable loads are shown in bold letters. Horizontal Loads End Zone Interior Zone Transverse Wall Roof Wall Roof < 5:12 12.8 -6.7 8.5 -4 5:12 17.8 -4.7 11.9 -2.6 > 5:12 14.4 9.9 11.5 7.9 Longitudinal 12.8 -6.7 8.5 -4 Vertical Loads End Zone Interior Zone Winward Overhang Transverse Windward Leeward Windward Leeward End Zone Interior Zone Roof Roof Roof Roof < 5:12 -15.4 -8.8 -10.7 -6.8 -21.6 -16.9 5:12 -15.4 -10.7 -10.7 -8.1 -21.6 -16.9 > 5:12 5.6 -8.8 4.8 -7.5 -5.1 -5.8 Longitudinal -15.4 -8.8 -10.7 -6.8 -21.6 -16.9 Maximum Horizontal Wall Loads Tr ansverse Zo _ 1 E 4E 1 4 < 5:12 9.8 -7.5 7.2 -5.8 5:12 12.1 -10.1 8.8 -7.5 > 5:12 1 10.7 -8.1 9.1 -6.8 Page 1 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburg. Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Longit 9.8 -7.5 7.2 -5.8 Component and Cladding Design Wind Pressures - Table 1609.6.2.1(2) -- -- - Ro - -- - - -- -- Zone Area < 5:12 5:12 > 5:12 1 10 10 -14.6 10 -13.3 13.3 -14.6 1 20 10 -14.2 10 -13 13 -13.8 1 50 10 -13.7 10 -12.5 12.5 -12.8 1 100 10 -13.3 10 -12.1 12.1 -12.1 2 10 10 -24.4 10 -28.2 13.3 -17 2 20 10 -21.8 10 -25.6 13 -16.3 2 50 10 -18.4 10 -22.1 12.5 -15.3 2 100 10 -15.8 10 -19.5 12.1 -14.6 3 10 10 -36.8 10 -28.2 13.3 -17 3 20 10 -30.5 10 -25.6 13 -16.3 3 50 10 -22.1 10 -22.1 12.5 -15.3 3 100 10 -15.8 10 -19.5 12.1 -14.6 Wall 4 10 14.6 -15.8 4 20 13.9 -15.1 4 50 13 -14.3 4 100 12.4 -13.6 5 10 14.6 -19.5 _ 5 20 13.9 -18.2 5 50 13 -16.5 5 100 12.4 -15.1 Roof Overhang Component and Cladding Design Wind Pressures - Table 1609.6.2.1(3) Zone Area < 5:12 5:12 > 5:12 2 10 -21 -27.2 -24.7 2 20 -20.6 -27.2 -24 2 50 -20.1 -27.2 -23 2 100 -19.8 -27.2 -22.2 3 10 -34.6 -45.7 -24.7 3 20 -27.1 -40.5 -24 3 50 -17.3 -33.6 -23 3 100 -10 _ -28.4 -22.2 1' 1609.6.2.1(4) Height and Exposure Adjustment Coefficient = Page 2 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO RcxuUl , iudllU 00.+.+U JHINODUKT UUNO I K - Seismic - -__ - - Reference Code - IBC 2000 Values for Ss, S1, Fa and Fv are taken from Code Control CD using Zip Code 1615.1.2.(1) Fa 1615.1.2(2) Fv Ss 0.606 g SI 0,193' g 1615.1 1615.1 -- Fa Fv Site Class A - Hard Rock 0.8 0.8 Site Class B - Dense Soil or Soft Rock 1 1 Site Class C - Stiff Soil _ 1.2 1.7 Site Class 1615.1.2 SMS = FaSs 1615.1.2 SM1 = FvS1 Design Spectral Resp Accel 1615.1.3 SDS = 2 /3 *SMS SDI = 2 /3 *SMI 1616.2 Seismic Use Grout) A B C 0.4848 0.6061 0.7272 0.1544 0.1931 0.3281 0.324816 0,406021 0.487224 0.103448 0.12931 0.219827 1616.3 Seismic Design Category Table 1616.3(1) D' Table 1616.3(2) D Seismic Response Coefficient 1617.6 (Table 1617.6) Response Modification Factor R = 1616.2 (Table 1604.5) Occupancy Importance Factor I = Basic Fundamental Period Ct Steel Moment Resisting Frame 0.035 Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame 0.03 All Other Building Systems 1 1 0.02 Building Height 37! ft Table 1617.4.2 Cu = Approximate Fundamental Period Ta = Ct *hn ^3/4 = Site Class Cs = SDS /(R /1) _ Max Cs = SD I /(R /I)T = - Min Cs = 0.044SDS *I = sec Rigid Bldg A B C 0.0541 0.0677 0.0068 0.0085 0.0143 0.0179 0.0812 0.0144 0.0214 Design Seismic Response Coefficient Page 3 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR 4/29/2003 Page 4 C D_ 0.0214 . 0 0.2736; Site Class A B Cs = 0.0143 0.0179 0.0236! W 0.10719 W 1617.4.1 Equiv Lateral Force Method V = CsW = 1617.5.1 Simplified Approach V = 1.2 *(SDS /R) *W = Determine Method of Seismic Analysis Light Framing Construction Criteria 3 2308.2.1 Building stories stories ft psf YES YES YES 2308.2.2 Bearing wall floor to floor height 9 2308.2.3.1 Average DL 1 15 2308.2.3.2 Floor Live Loads 40 psf YES 2308.2.3.3 Ground Snow Load 50 psf YES YES 2308.2.4 Wind speed 90 mph 2308.2.5 Truss Span 40 ft YES 1616.6.1 Simplified Analysis Requirements 1. Does Building meet light frame construction criteria ? YES 2. Is building of any other construction with flexible diaphragms at every level as defined in section 1602 ? YES Building may use Simplified Analysis Method 4/29/2003 Page 4 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Type Fb psi Fv psi E psi LVL 2600 285 1900000 GLB 2400 190 1800000 DF 1300 95 1900000 Beam 1 Floor Support Type LVL Fb psi Fv psi E psi 2600 285 1900000 19 ft -- Span = Tributary Area = 13 ft _0 Loads Point Load = Ibs Snow 0 psf Uniform Load = 0 Ibs /ft Live Load 40', psf 520 Ibs /ft Dead Load 15' psf 195 Ibs /ft Moment Live Load Moment = 23465 lb-ft = 281580 lb -in Dead Load Moment = 8799 lb-ft = 105593 lb -in Section Modulus Required = 148.91 in3 Section Width = 7' in. Section Depth = 11.875 in. Section Modulus Provided = 164.5 in3 OK Moment of Ineritia Provided = 976.8 in4 Deflection Live Load = 0.06 in. U360 0.63 in. OK Dead Load = 0.31 in. Total = 0.37 in. U240 0.95 in. OK Horizontal Shear fv = 123 psi OK FV = 285 psi Allowable Reaction = 6792.5 Ibs Use 7 X 1 11.875 LVL Page 1 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Type_ Fb psi Fv psi E psi _ LVL 2600 285 1900000 GLB_ 2400 190 1800000 DF 1300 95 1900000 Beam 2 Floor Support Type LVL Fb psi Fv psi 2600 285 8 E psi 1900000 Span = ft Tributary Area = 10 ft 0 Ibs Loads Point Load = Snow 0'' psf Uniform Load = 0 Ibs /ft Live Load 40 psf 15, psf 400 Ibs /ft Dead Load 150 Ibs /ft Moment Live Load Moment = 3200 lb-ft = 38400 lb-in Dead Load Moment = 1200 lb-ft = 14400 lb-in Section Modulus Required = 20.31 in3 Section Width = 1.75' Section Depth = 11.875 in. in. Section Modulus Provided = 41.1 in3 OK Moment of Ineritia Provided = 244.2 in4 Deflection Live Load = 0.01 in. U360 0.27 in. OK Dead Load = 0.03 in. Total = 0.04 in. U240 0.4 in. OK Horizontal Shear fv = 159 ps OK FV = 285 psi Allowable Reaction = 2200 Ibs Use 1.75 X 11.875 LVL Page 2 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Type - Fb psi Fv psi E psi LVL 2600 285 1900000 GLB 2400 190 1800000 DF 1300 95 1900000 Beam 3 Window Header 6 ft at Roof Type DF Fb psi 1300 lFv psi 95 6' JE psi 1900000; Span = ft Tributary Area = 17 ft 0; Loads Point Load = Ibs Snow 35, psf Uniform Load = 595 Ibs /ft Live Load 0 psf Dead Load 15, psf 0 Ibs /ft 255 Ibs /ft Moment Live Load Moment = 2678 lb-ft = 32130 lb-in Dead Load Moment = 1148 lb-ft = 13770 lb-in Section Modulus Required = 35.31 in3 Section Width = 4.5 Section Depth = 9,25! in. in. _ Section Modulus Provided = 64.2 in3 OK Moment of Ineritia Provided = 296.8 in4 Deflection Live Load = 0.03 in. U360 0.20 in. OK Dead Load = 0.01 in. Total = 0.04 in. U240 0.3 in. OK Horizontal Shear fv = 92 psi OK FV = 109.25 psi Allowable Reaction = 2550 Ibs Use 4.5 X 9.25 DF Page 3 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Type Fb psi F v psi E ps LVL 2600 285 1900000 GLB 2400 190 1800000 DF 130 95 1900000 _ Beam 4 Window Header 6 ft at Floor Type DF Fb psi 1300 lFv psi 95 6 E psi 1900000; Span = ft Tributary Area = 10 ft 0 Loads Point Load = Ibs Snow 0 psf Uniform Load = 0 Ibs /ft Live Load 40 psf Dead Load 15; psf 400 Ibs /ft 150 Ibs /ft Moment Live Load Moment = 1800 lb-ft = 21600 lb-in Dead Load Moment = 675 lb-ft = 8100 lb-in Section Modulus Required = 22.85 in3 Section Width = 3 in. Section Depth = 9.25' in. Section Modulus Provided = 42.8 in3 OK Moment of Ineritia Provided = 197.9 in4 Deflection Live Load = 0.00 in. U360 0.20 in. OK Dead Load = 0.01 in. Total = 0.01 in. U240 0.3 in. OK Horizontal Shear fv = 89 psi OK FV = 95 psi Allowable Reaction = 1650 Ibs Use 3 X 9.25 1 DF Page 4 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexbur , Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Foundation Design Max Roof Span = 36 ft Max Floor Span = O Wall Height= 27' ft Stem Wall Height = 4 ft Stem Wall Width = 10' in. _ Allowable Bearing Capacity 1500 psf _ 35' psf 80 psf 15 psf 15 psf 0_' psf 30 psf Snow Load Floor Live Load Wall Dead Load Roof Dead Load Brick Dead Load Floor Dead Load (2 floors) Exterior Bearing Walls Proposed Footing Width 24 in Roof Loads 900 Ibs /ft Floor Loads 0 Ibs /ft Depth 10 in Wall Load 1 405 Ibs /ft Stem Wall Load 500 Ibs /ft Footing Load 250 Ibs /ft Total 2055 Ibs /ft Bearing Pressure = 1028 psf OK Reinforcing Requirements Min Reinforcing Factors Footing 0.002 Stem Wall Vertical 0.0012 #4 _ 0.2 Horizontal 0.002 Reinforcing Bar in *in Footing Continuous Reinforcing Count 2 bars _ Stem Wall Continuous Reinforcing Count 5 bars Vertical - Reinforcing Spacing 17 in. Page 1 Design Intelligence, LLC 3685 W Hwy 33 Rexb " CAMBRIDGE COURT REXBURG, IDAHO 4/29/2003 MY, IUcl11U 00'h'4U JFUIVJOUR T t. %JNO 1 R Foundation Desicin Allowable Bearing Ca Snow Load Floor Live Load Wall Dead Load 1500 psf 1i5' psf 0' psf Max Roof Span = 0 ft Brick Dead Load Floor Loads 1430 Max Floor Span = 26' ft 35' psf (2 floors) Wall Height = 27 ft 80' psf Stem Wall Height = 4 ft 1'5' psf Stem Wall Load Stem Wall Width = 10 in. Roof Dead Load 0 1i5' psf 0' psf Brick Dead Load Floor Loads 1430 Ibs /ft Floor Dead Load 30' psf (2 floors) 405 Ibs /ft Interior Bearing Walls Stem Wall Load 500 Ibs /ft Proposed Footing Roof Loads 0 Ibs /ft Width 24' in Floor Loads 1430 Ibs /ft Depth 10 in Wall Load 1 405 Ibs /ft Stem Wall Load 500 Ibs /ft Footing Load 250 Ibs /ft Total 2585 Ibs /ft Bearing Pressure = 1293 psf OK Reinforcing Requirements Min Reinforcing Factors Footing 0.002 Stem Wall Vertical 0.0012 _ #4 0.2' in*in Horizontal 0.002 Reinforcing Bar Footing Continuous Reinforcing Count 2 bars Stem Wall Continuous Reinforcing Count 5 bars Vertical - Reinforcing Spacing 17 in. Page 2 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Spread F ooting Design Values 1500,, 0.002' 2500 40000' Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure = psf Min Reinforcing Factor= Concrete Strength @ 28 days psi Steel Reinforcing (fy) = psi Stair Support - F1 Description Vertical Moment 5000 Ibs Stairs ft-Ibs L = Length 2' ft 2 ft B = Width Weight 600 Ibs Thickness 1 ft V = 5600 Ibs e = MN 0.0000 Qmax = V /BL(1 +6e /L) = 1400 psf Qmin = V /BL(1 -6e /L) = 1400 psf Reinforcing for Long Direction Use 2 ft. Wide X 12 in. Deep Footing Calculated Minimum Reinforcing = 0.576 in *in Rebar Size = #4 Area = 0.2 in *in Use 3 #4 9.00 in O.C. Reinforcing for Short Direction Use 2 ft. Wide X 12 in. Deep Footing Calculated Minimum Reinforcing = 0.576 in *in Rebar Size = #4 - Area 0.2 in *in Use 3 #4 1 9.00 in. O.C. Page 1 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexburq, Idaho 83440 SAINSBURY CONSTR Shear Wall Analysis - Third Flo Walls 22 psf 10 ft 9 ft 16 ft = 232 ft ^2 Wind Load = Roof Height = Wall Height = Length of Long Wall = Area at Mid Height of Wall _ Wind Force = 5104 Ibs 40 Shear Wall Length ft Shear /ft in Wall @ Mid Height 128 Ibs /ft Provide 1/2" APA rated sheathing, one side, of each interior party and exterior wall with 8d nails at 6" o.c. at panel edges and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required. Seismic Analysis Seismic Multiplier = 0.107 Width Roof Dead Load 40 Long Wall Length 16 ft Length 15 Load 24', (includes snow) Weight 14400 Ibs Short Wall Length 40'' ft Height Length 112 Load 15 Weight Wall Dead Load 9 7560 Ibs Seismic Force @ Mid Height of Wall 2350 Ibs Shear Wall Length 40',j ft Shear per ft in Wall @ Mid Height 59 Ibs /ft OK Provide 1/2" APA rated sheathing, one side, of each interior party and exterior wall with 8d nails at 6" o.c. at panel edges and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required. Page 1 Design Intelligence, LLC CAMBRIDGE COURT 4/29/2003 3685 W Hwy 33 REXBURG, IDAHO Rexbura. Idaho 83440 SAINSR1JRY CONSTR Shear Wall Analysis - Seco Floor Walls - -- 22 psf 10 ft 27 ft 16 ft Wind Load = - - -- - -- - Roof Height = Wall Height = (places reaction at mid height of wall) Length of Long Wall = _ Area at Mid Height of Wall = 376 ft ^2 Wind Force = 8272 Ibs Shear Wall Length 40 ft Shear /ft in Wall @ Mid Height 207 Ibs /ft Provide 1/2" APA rated sheathing, one side, of each interior party and exterior wall with 8d nails at 4" o.c. at panel edges and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required. Shear Wall Analysis - Firtst Floor Walls 22,E psf 10 ft 45 ft 16 ft = 520 ft ^2 Wind Load = Roof Height = _ Wall Height = (places reaction at mid _ height of wall) Length of Long Wall = Area at Mid Height of Wall Wind Force = 11440 Ibs 40 Shear Wall Length ft Shear /ft in Wall @ Mid Height 286 Ibs /ft Provide 1/2" APA rated sheathing, one side, of each interior party and exterior wall with 8d nails at 4" o.c. at panel edges and 12" o.c. in the field. Blocking is required. Page 2