Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO & DOCS - 03-00023 - BYUI Benson Building - Room 205 RemodelCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Rexburg Department of Building Inspection Building Permit No: R- 02 -09 Applicable edition of code: ❑ International Building Code 2000 ❑ International Residential Code 2000 Site address: 525 South Center Street Use and occupancy: Educational Type of construction: ' 0�" D i Old - a Design occupant load: Sprinkler System required: ❑ Yes ❑ No Name and address of owner: BYU -Idaho 525 South Center Street Rexburg, ID 8,, 440 Contractor: Jacobsen Construction Special conditions: Occupancy: ❑ Full ❑ Partial ❑ Temporary This Certificate, issued pursuant to the requirements of Section Iog o the International Building Code, certifies that, at the time of issuance, tLjis building or at portion of tLje building that was inspected on the date listed was f ouna to be in compliance with the requirements of the code for the group and division of occupancN and the use for which the proposed occupancN was classi f iea. Date: November 4, 2003 ( C.O. Issued by: Official There shall be no futuWchange in the exfkng o cupancy classification of the building nor shall any structural changes, modifications or ad ns be made to the building or any portion thereof until the Buil ' ,) Official has revie d and approved said future changes. Water Department A- v" ira Department State of Idaho Electrical Department - (208- 356-4830 ) ❑ Merlin Webster BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION REXBURG, ID DATE l � NO. t -IC THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. C OWNE F� Y U l�A F� C� JOB ADDRESS GA�nS S ONE BUILDER ARCHITECT fA WIMA , I fz (—S DESIGNER STRUCTURE: Q NEW Q ,�O� REMODEL ADDITION —' ' - Q REPAIR Q RENEWAL Q FIRE DAMAGE Q RESIDENCE Q COMM. DUCATIONAL Q GOVT Q RELIGIOUS Q FENCE Q PATIO Q CARPORT Q GARAGE Q AWNING FOOTINGS FOUNDATION BASEMENT FLOORS EXT. WALLS INT. WALLS CEILING ROOF HEAT INSULATED CONCRETE CONCRETE Q PARTIAL Q WOOD Q WOOD Q WOOD Q WOOD ILT UP. Q GAS ALLS CI MASONRY MASONRY FULL CONCRETE AMASONRY Q MASONRY Q DRYWALL Q WOOD SH. Q OIL EILING Q OTHER Q OTHER NO Q OTHER CONCRETE CONCRETE Q PLASTER Q COMP. COAL Q FLOORS Q VENEER DRYWALL Q TILE Q TILE Q FIREPLACE ERIMETER Q METAL Q PLASTER OUSTIC Q ROLL ROOF. Q ELECTRIC Q STUCCO Q TILE Q OPEN Q METAL This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Uniform Building Code and Zoning Regulations of Rexburg, and it is hereby agreed that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specifications will be completed in accordance with the regulations pertaining and applicable thereto: The issuance of the permit does not waive res trictive covenants. -- _ - - -- -- REMARKS: O 's !I DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING do ZONING ? ,2 F - VALUE Qb ® - FEE PAID Q CASH APPLICANT BUILDING DATE ADDRESS INSPECTOR �c WHITE-Owner's Copy CANARY - Building Department's Copy PINK - Assessor's Copy GOLDENROD - Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF REXBURG, EDAHO Date of Application Permit No. OWNER Name Site Address Mailing Address C; City /State /Zip Telephone/F=Mobile `0 �4 -v CONTRACTOR Name C6 Mailing Address _ .,56k 5 S City /State /Zip Telephone/Fax/Mobile t� PROJECT INFORMATION DEPARTMENT APPROV Property Zone: Is existing use compatible with zoning, (screening parking, etc) When was this building last occupied Ln AU T1Jl7t �fl,{SLC•� Architect/ Engineer Firm �',j 2(�-� l Plan Name L��& �_OQ 7-7 7(UD Subdivisio Lot Block Circle One Residential Commercial rational Government Remodel Other Circle One New House Addition/Remodel to House New Commercial Commercial Remodel Circle One Basemen . , one/ Finished / Unfinished Other: None/ Patio/ Carport/ Awning N/A Lot Square Footage Lot Width Square Feet 6W Garage Square Feet Number of Storie Height of Building What will structure be used for: Home Home Business Apartment Commercial Other EV U Will there be an apartment ? If so, how many units Total Estimated Cost Are you in a flood plain Signature of Applicant f l Code Building Permit Fees &O S 3, 7z' Zone L`'JU Plan Check Fees 3 �W � s Building Type Plumbing Permit Fees Digging Permit Fees I Water & Sewer Fees / � Signature of Inspector Front Footage Fee TOTAL $ 12,2&2— Issued by APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF REXBURG, IDAHO Date of Application Permit OWNER Name Mailing Address • � X � - 7 (� ) � City /State/Zip _ �0� k� �'� �� ��(i a-' Telephone/Fax/Mobile c�Dl q7 -., rn r onfr ZO ( f9P_a C j�j aD �� �3a PROJECT INFORMATION DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Property Zone: Is existing use compatible with zoning, (screening parking, etc) When was this building last occupied _ j -' M_7 9 OOLC-4 1.,f Architect/ Engineer Firm &jTl�& Plan Nagle Subdivision ���� - `v Lot Circle One Residential Commercial catio Government Circle One New House Addition/Remodel to House Circle One Basement: None/ imshe Unfinished Block Remodel Other New Commercial Commercial Remodel Other: None/ Patio/ Carport/ Awning N/A Lot Square Footage Lot Width Square Feet 6 Garage Square Feet Number of Stories _t� Height of Building I What will structure be used for: Home Home Business Apartment Commercial Other fj y Q (� Will there be an apartment ? If so, how many units Total Estimated Co Z r i /1 Are you in a flood plain t, Signature of * * * * * * * * * ** Code Zone Building Type Signature of Building Permit Fees Plan Check Fees Plumbing Permit Fees, Digging Permit Fees Water & Sewer Fees Front Footage Fee TOTAL S Issued by Name Site Addres j j��p Ar- CITY OF REXBURG APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT Rough plumbing OWNER FEES Name � 1�`!>. t „% Plumbing Permit .................. . Address 4 Sewer Inspection ............... Lot Blk. Add. Inspection of Pipe ................... $ Toilet '' 1101 PLUMBER Inspection of Fixtures ................ $ Name ,.So $ L t.). Address Te1. Floor Drain Drinking Fountains NATURE OF INSTALLATION TOTAL $ Use 0 :) r) I M;t N t Received: Date Rough plumbing Septic Tank Fixtures arT°" 'a Water Piping Complete.« Sewer DESCRIPTION OF WORK Bath Tubs Urinal ` Showers Sink Trap Laundry Trays Water Heater Wash Basin - 1w , t Other Toilet '' 1101 Slop Sinks Kitchem9inks Y't Floor Drain Drinking Fountains Lawn Sprinklers Water Softeners Dish Washing Mach. Clothes Washer 0 B y INSPECTOR'S RECOR N PA r% i W OCT 3 2002 E INSP. NAME Rough Plum hi{ig Sewer Other Finish Plumbing .�xoavaticr & _ xar thwcrjc: coacr o S S 1 Hascr=y: j % Roofing: 1 111 _ f 5 C, , ll► 1, 4470 Drywall: Painting: Floor Coverings: A ;� g : C a ZN „ca1 fin, aoq� §:A S- Plumb' g : _1c�5 `c�rnc`� La.� -�- �`nr� ►,� -r(�q� - _�]� d S- x'703 f Heating SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER) Roof Trusses: . Floor / cail±nc Joists: Cafiine is Skiing /z Trim: ys 0 Q l a - !/ F �eGIS14 STATE OF IDAHO P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 PHONE (208) 359 -3020 FAx (208) 359 -3022 E4mL cityhall@ci.rexburg.id.us Sam Moss Jacobson Construction BYU -Idaho Campus To Whom It May Concern: 19 December 2003 The addition to the Benson Building has been completed and inspections by the Building, Fire, and Plumbing departments have been completed satisfactorily. Only the Electrical inspectors signature is needed to issue the permanent Certificate of Occupancy. As per verbal confirmation with the City Clerk there are a few minor items that need to be completed. This letter is to give the owner, BYU- Idaho, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy and to allow them to start moving in and occupying the building until the electrical inspection is completed and the permanent Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. If there are any questions regarding this letter please call me at 208 - 359 -3020 ext. 314. Thanks for your co- operation. Sincerely, Jon Berry Building Inspector Cc to: BYU -Idaho Lloyd Benson Val Christenson Rexburg Building Official BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY IDAHO October 31, 2003 City of Rexburg Attn: Val Christensen, Building Inspector P.O. Box 280 Rexburg, ID 83440 Re: Welding Inspections at the ion Building Dear Val; As per your request at the City luncheon on October 23` we will inspect an additional 10% of the beam welds in the Benson Building addition here on the BYU -Idaho campus. (The location of these welds to be identified by the City of Rexburg Building Department.) Also, as part of your request, T2M will do the inspections and submit their findings to you. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Cc: Charles Andersen T2M Consulting Lloyd Benson Project Manager 450 S. Physical Plant Way Rexburg, ID 83460 -8205 Phone: (208) 496 -2460 Fax: (208) 496 -2490 Email: bensonlc @byui.edu Yroject Manager P.O. Box 143 Rexburg, ID 83440 208- 757 -9172 10/21/03 Lloyd Benson Construction Manager BYU Idaho Physical Plant 450 S. Physical Plant Way Rexburg, ID 83460 -8205 RE: - Skybridge ' Dear Lloyd, This is an amendment to our previous letter in regards to the Benson Building Skybridge. At your request T2M Consulting has performed a second inspection on the already completed Skybridge in the new section of the Benson Building from grid line 2.0 to 3.0 and from G.9 to the existing building. We utilized a torque wrench and filet weld gauges to do a thorough investigation of the structural items pertaining to the Skybridge. All welds, high strength bolts, structural steel, and epoxy anchor bogs appear to meet plans and specifications. Approximately 10% of the items were not accessible, which still meets the UBC Section 1701.5 Item 5 for periodic inspection of fillet welds and the AISC "Specifications for Structural 36ints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts ". It is T2M Consulting's professional opinion that all.work performed is in compliance with all applicable building codes and project documentation. Thank you for your time. We kx* forward to working with you in the future. Val Christensen From: Brian Hauff [brianh @ctagroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:51 PM To: Val Christiansen (E -mail) Cc: Rulon Nielsen (E- mail); Ryan Adelman (E- mail); Chuck Frost (E- mail); Chuck Frost (E -mail 2); Bradley, Rick; Dietrich, Tom; Hinton, Robert; Mackay, Scott; Morris, Kirk; Morrison, Jeff; Reeder, Shawn; Wilson, Scott Subject: City review comments for the Benson building Val Christiansen, We received your comments on Friday and we have been incorporating your information per addendum. The addendum # 1 is planned on going out Thursday afternoon July 25. Addendum # 2 is planned on going out Friday afternoon August 2. The bid date for the Benson project is Friday August 9. I left a message on your voice mail. Since you are busy, I thought I would e -mail a response to you to give you an update on where we are with responding to your comments. Item 1: We acknowledge this as an issue, but unfortunately this is out of our scope of work. Please contact BYU's campus architect, Rulon Nielsen at 496 -2449 Item 2: We are coordinating a response to this with the Owner and when we come to a conclusion, we will present it to you. Item 3: This information is included in the specifications you receive. For the last few years, CTA has used an option of putting the Door, Frame and Hardware Schedule in the written specifications after the Finish Hardware spec. Please also look on the Fire plans (F101 and F102) for other relevent information. Item 4: After reviewing the existing building needs and the code regarding accessibility requirements, it was determined that (1) accessible entry was required. The existing building at the North entry already has an accessible entrance. The existing building and the new building will still have an elevator for accessibility from floor to floor. Therefore, providing an accessible entry to the addition from the East seemed a logical solution which followed the required codes. Item 5: We are modifying the interior ramps to comply with the code for this item. This information will be included by addendum. Item 6: We have reviewed these items and acknowledge that they will be done during construction. We are currently addressing the Fire Department's comments and incorporating our response. Some items are out of our scope (for example, the width of the fire lane). Keller Associates is putting together the information for the fire hydrant flows. We are incorporating the revisions to the fire alarm components for compliance. We will send you (2) copies of the addenda for distribution: (1) to the Rexburg Fire Department and (1) for your use. If you have any questions, I plan on being in the office tomorrow (Thursday July 25). I plan on being in Rexburg on Friday July 26 for the Pre -Bid meeting with General Contractors. Thanks, Brian Hauff CTA 1 rl c d � STATE OF IDAHO www.ci.rexburgJd.us P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone(208)359 -3020 Fax(208)359 -3022 e -mail rexburg@ci.rexburg.id.us 8/27/2002 Rulon Neilsen Ricks College Physical Plant Rexburg, ID 83440 Dear Rulon, I received your letter addressing the Accessible Parking that I had asked about on my review of the Benson Drawings. Paragraph 4.6.2 of the ADA Standards for Accessible Design requires that "Accessible parking spaces serving a particular building shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel to an accessible entrance_" Having the parking for the Benson Addition located at the Multi -Use Facility brings up an interesting problem. If we look at the University Parking on a "campus wide" basis, does that mean that we can locate all new parking on satellite lots? Shouldn't the requirement for handicap spaces generated by the additional students and faculty utilizing the new additions or buildings be filled with close -in parking spaces. Are you suggesting that handicap spaces up at the Multi -Use Facility should count for the required handicapped spaces for new buildings and additions around campus? Shouldn't we be changing the existing close -in parking spaces to handicapped spaces as additional buildings or additions are created? It seems to me that the ADA Standards require that the close -in spaces be converted to handicapped spaces, even if it reduces the overall amount of close -in parking. If shuttles were operated from satellite parking lots, the handicapped spaces would be required to be those closest to the shuttle pick -up. The amount of parking spaces required to be handicapped spaces is in Section 4.1.2 of the ADA Standards. Item 5 of this section reads "If parking spaces are provided for self parking by employees or visitors, or both, then accessible spaces complying with 4.6 shall be provided in each such parking area in conformance with the table below." As I stated in my review letter "According to the code analysis on sheet F101 a possible additional 591 students could occupy the building, therefore an additional 148 parking spaces would be need to be provided. The University has plans to increase parking on an entire campus level. Therefore, an additional parking lot is not required in close proximity to the building. However, additional handicapped parking is still required. ADA requirements identify the need for 5 additional handicapped parking spaces." In your letter you state that you prefer "not to add accessible stalls in this area" and then offer to add two if pressured. Perhaps we have some misunderstandings between the City and the University concerning handicapped parking. At no time did we intend to overlook ADA Requirements when we agreed to view campus parking on an overall picture. Could the City and the University staffs involved with parking get together and discuss this matter? We also have some changes in our Building Department with the addition of Bill Hamlin as a new inspector and would like to introduce him to rest of your staff. We also would like to outline some of the new measures that we are implementing in our inspection procedures. You have been so generous in the past with hosting us at "working luncheons ", we felt it was our turn to invite you to City Hall for a working luncheon. Let us know if September 10 at 11:30 A.M. would be available for this meeting. Would you please provide copies of this letter and invitation to all of those from your staff that will be attending? Will you also get back to us with a count of those who will attend? Please get back to us as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 324. Sincerely, Val Christensen Building Official C.C. Mayor Bruce Sutherland John Millar Stephen Zollinger Bill Hamlin Jon Berry Chris Huskinson Kurt Hibbert BYU -IDAHO Benson Building. Addition Rexburg, Idaho Storm Drainage Summary 0� June 19, 2002 �' :14 r 1 *14 FO ,SSOCIATES, 131 SW 5` Ave. Suite A Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 288 -1992 Benson Building Addition Drainage Summary Purpose This document is the storm drainage summary for the above mentioned project. It summarizes the intent of the site storm drainage system including discussions of existing drainage issues and future impacts to the collection system. The purpose of the document is to study the drainage issues for the building expansion, but not for master planning purposes. However, a general understanding of the existing storm system is necessary. Drainage System The overall area of the BYU -Idaho campus is quite large. Some basic knowledge of the existing runoff pattern is necessary to understand the proposed improvements. Natural runoff from campus flows in a northwesterly fashion. Runoff through campus is generated above the intersection of 2 nd Street East and 7` Street South and continues all the way through campus. In the late 70's as the Benson Building expanded, a 24 -inch storm drain system was constructed to collect runoff from a settling pond east of the Benson Building. This settling pond was constructed to alleviate the peak runoff from the large contributing area. Discharge from this settling pond was intended to flow into the 24 -inch pipe, run under the building, and into the storm drain system near Center Street and 5 Street South. However more recently, as development of the gardens and arboretum occurred, runoff from the pond was pushed further north and is no longer being collected by the 24- inch pipe, thus deactivating the system. Present drainage of this area of campus flows into the parking lot north of the Benson building and down Center Street until it intercepts a storm drain system near Center Street and Viking Drive (4 Street South). Maintenance crews indicate that it is quite a mess during the spring runoff. The location of the proposed building addition is next to this natural drainage area. As part of this project, the existing 24 -inch storm drain pipe for which was used to collect pond discharge is going to be abandoned and replaced with a new 24 -inch storm drain pipe and catch manhole. Thus, runoff will be sent back into the 24 -inch storm drainage collection system, reactivating the system. The drainage area and settling pond is comprised of grass. Additionally, the 24 -inch concrete storm drain pipe, located under the proposed building, will be replaced with PVC to meet current building codes. By reactivating the 24 -inch storm drain, impacts may occur to the downstream collection system. We understand that this was the intent of the 24 -inch piped system, so this reactivation approach is consistent with this plan. We request feedback from the City on this matter. Consequently, it may help minimize problems in other collection systems. Site Modifications The overall construction area is approximately 1.8 acres (excluding the water line extensions for fire protection). For simplicity, the improvements have been divided into three parts: 1) Impervious Area; 2) Pervious Area; and 3) Building Area. The table below identifies existing and proposed areas for each category: June 19, 2002 BYU -Idaho Page 1 of 2 Benson Building Addition As can be seen from the above table, the impervious site area is decreased as a result of the removal of some of the paved accesses to the existing building. The pervious area is also decreased (roughly 0.3 acres) which is caused by removing grassy areas adjacent to the existing building. The new building addition takes up the decreased areas and results in the 0.45 acres of new building area. All roof runoff will be collected inside the building as part of the mechanical system and discharge to the 24 -inch storm drain pipe. Overall, there is a net increase of 0.30 acres of impefvious area. We understand the goal is to have no net increase in stormwater discharge; however, with the difficulty of the site due to elevation challenges and the retrofit of the proposed addition, we feel the increase in discharge is minimal. Moreover, we feel the significant change is the reactivation of the 24 -inch storm drain system. The City and University should meet to discuss any potential impacts to the downstream system. Since a portion of the building is in a cut, a berm will be constructed along portions of the east side of the building to eliminate runoff from entering the building. In addition, two catch basins will be constructed in grass areas to pick up stormwater runoff generated east of the building which is not collected in the detention pond. These collection points will also discharge to the 24 -inch storm drain line and is similar to the present drainage pattern. All other storm drain lines which currently exist adjacent to the building will be retained and protected during construction. Construction As part of this project, the contractor is required to meet local requirements for construction storm drainage runoff and erosion control measures. We anticipate silt fences will be used around the site; however, the erosion control type will be implemented by the contractor. Additionally at any soil stockpile locations, the contractor is required to provide erosion control measures. This summarizes the storm water system for Benson Addition at BYU- Idaho. June 19, 2002 BYU -Idaho Page 2 of 2 Benson Building Addition Existing Area (Acres) Proposed Area (Acres) Change (Acres) Impervious Area 0.5 0.35 -0.15 Pervious Area 1.0 0.7 -0 Building Area 0.3 0.75 +0.45 As can be seen from the above table, the impervious site area is decreased as a result of the removal of some of the paved accesses to the existing building. The pervious area is also decreased (roughly 0.3 acres) which is caused by removing grassy areas adjacent to the existing building. The new building addition takes up the decreased areas and results in the 0.45 acres of new building area. All roof runoff will be collected inside the building as part of the mechanical system and discharge to the 24 -inch storm drain pipe. Overall, there is a net increase of 0.30 acres of impefvious area. We understand the goal is to have no net increase in stormwater discharge; however, with the difficulty of the site due to elevation challenges and the retrofit of the proposed addition, we feel the increase in discharge is minimal. Moreover, we feel the significant change is the reactivation of the 24 -inch storm drain system. The City and University should meet to discuss any potential impacts to the downstream system. Since a portion of the building is in a cut, a berm will be constructed along portions of the east side of the building to eliminate runoff from entering the building. In addition, two catch basins will be constructed in grass areas to pick up stormwater runoff generated east of the building which is not collected in the detention pond. These collection points will also discharge to the 24 -inch storm drain line and is similar to the present drainage pattern. All other storm drain lines which currently exist adjacent to the building will be retained and protected during construction. Construction As part of this project, the contractor is required to meet local requirements for construction storm drainage runoff and erosion control measures. We anticipate silt fences will be used around the site; however, the erosion control type will be implemented by the contractor. Additionally at any soil stockpile locations, the contractor is required to provide erosion control measures. This summarizes the storm water system for Benson Addition at BYU- Idaho. June 19, 2002 BYU -Idaho Page 2 of 2 Benson Building Addition 4r :z KELLER 131 S.W. 5th Avenue, Suite A • Meridian, ID 83642 June 19, 2002 Brian A. Hauff, A.I.A. CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Re: Benson Building Addition Storm Drainage Summary Dear Brian, Please find attached our storm drain summary for the above mentioned project. This should be provided to the City of Rexburg during the plan submittal process. The purpose of this is to summarize the way storm drainage may be handled for this project. Additionally, we would like to be sure you and the University are aware of storm drain system issues. Over the past few years, the University has been experiencing flooding problems. Through some quick research, we feel part of this problem was due to the 24- inch storm drain being inactive, thus sending runoff a different direction (north of the Benson Building). As you know, we suggested a master plan be performed for the storm drainage to help fully understand the drainage problem. However, we were instructed this is under a separate contract, and a scope limit of 20 feet outside of the new building was set. As part of the project, a new 24 -inch storm drain line will reactivate, the original storm drain collection system. By doing this, flooding problems north of and in the immediate vicinity of the proposed building may be reduced. Our concern is related to "reactivating" the storm drain, resulting in downstream system impacts. We strongly recommend that a more comprehensive "off- site" analysis be performed to better understand why flooding and sedimentation is occurring at the proposed building site and what, if any, potential impacts and mitigation may be needed associated with reactivation of the downstream drainage system. These efforts should occur prior to any construction activities. 102030/2/02 -294 d1c A Company of Professional Engineers and Scientists Ph: (208) 288 -1992 • Fax: (208) 288 -1999 Brian A. Hauff, A.I.A. CTA Architects Engineers June 19, 2002 Page 1 of 2 Keller Associates is available to assist in this additional research and analysis, and / or convey these concerns to the civil engineer who is reportedly performing the comprehensive campus analysis. Feel free to call me at (208) 28 81992 if you have any questions. , Sincerely, KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC. Ryan N. Adelman, P.E. Enclosures cc: Chuck Frost, BYU -Idaho (Letter Only) r i f 102030/2/02 -294 d1c 4 ;JNIVLRS l Y I DA I -1 O August 16, 2002 Building Department City of Rexburg 12 N. Center Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Attention: Val Christensen Subject: Benson Addition Comment Response Storm Water Run -off. The University has contracted with Keller and Associates to conduct the master planning for the development of the remainder campus property to 7' south. The goals of the study are to maintain order in any possible future expansion and manage run -off. The plan will manage the storm water on campus property for slow release into the City Storm Sewer system. The new roof area for the addition will drain into existing piping and thus into the existing Storm Drain System. Plans for this work will be submitted to the City Offices for review. 2. Accessible Parking. The University currently provides 46 off - street accessible parking stalls. The addition of 5 new stalls into the Benson parking lot will require 7 traditional stalls be removed. ADAAG, 4.1.2 Accessible Sites and Exterior Facilities: New Construction, 4.1.2 (5), Table, requires that the number of stalls be calculated based on parking lot size. If the Entire Campus is considered, 20 stalls plus 1 per 100 are required. We have a total of 2760 parking stalls that requires 20 + 1760/100 * 1 = 38 stalls. There are 6 stalls in the Taylor/Benson Parking lot of 153 stalls where 6 are required. There are an additional 2 stalls on Center Street. From these calculations, it appears that there are adequate stalls on campus and in the immediate area. Our preference is not to add accessible stalls in this area. If this is not an option, we would offer to install 2 additional stalls adjacent to the existing cross walk opposite the existing accessible stalls. (We are currently preparing the Multi -Use Building parking lot for use. This lot contains 3 accesslul Stalls iii a ICS 01. 31 i , Lail iiGI InCliidcd iii fill, previous calculations.) 3. Fire lane access. I held a telephone conversation with the Fire Marshall regarding the fire lane. The lane as shown on the site plan will be a temporary lane for fire and construction access. The width is planned @ 16'. The lane will be constructed from 10" road base and gravel to support concrete trucks and fire apparatus. The site will be scarified 6" below existing grade. Rulon Nielsen Campus Architect 525 S. Center Rexburg, ID 83460 -8205 Phone: (208) 496 -2449 Far: (208) 496 -2490 City of Rexburg Building 12 N. Center Rexburg, ID 83440 (208)359 -3020 Plan analysis based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code Project Number: 07_17_02 Project Name: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Occupancy: B,A2.1,A3 -U1,B Construction: II- 1hr:V -N Date: July 18, 2002 Contractor: Designer: CTA Engineer: CTA Report By: Val Christensen NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC. It is a guide to selected sections of the code. Report created using Plan Analyst software by b w & a. (719) 599 -5622 Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced from the Uniform Building Code with the permission of the International Conference of Building Officials. --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION # 1 NFPA 13 sprinkler system throughout the building Sprinkler system used for allowable area increase -- Sec. 505.3 SEPARATION DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION NORTH Building 8.0 Feet 4.0 Feet EAST Building 200.0 Feet 100.0 Feet SOUTH Public way 1099.0 Feet 1049.5 Feet WEST Separation wall 0.0 Feet 0.0 Feet Allowable area increased 50.% for open area on 2 sides. -- Sec. 505.1 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 2 FL ------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS 1 Offices B ok 2016 81000 0.02 ok 1 Auditorium E217 A3 ok 1407 60750 0.02 ok 1 Lab E218 B ok 1273 81000 0.02 ok 1 Lab 218a &b B ok 1170 81000 0.01 ok 1 Lab E219 B ok 1283 81000 0.02 ok 1 Lab E219A B ok 988 81000 0.01 ok 1 Lab E 220 B ok 1269 81000 0.02 ok 1 Lab E225 B ok 1226 81000 0.02 ok 1 Lab E231 B ok 1011 81000 0.01 ok 1 Lab E243 B ok 606 81000 0.01 ok 1 Auditorium Small A3 ok 952 60750 0.02 ok 1 Lab E245 B ok 603 81000 0.01 ok 1 Assembly Lobby Area A2.1 ok 3000 60750 .0.05 ok 1 Mechanical Room B ok 500 81000 0.01 ok 1 Accessory B ok 6114 81000 0.08 ok TOTAL FOR FLOOR 23418 75259 0.31 ok Bl Mechanical Room B ok 1387 81000 0.02 ok TOTAL FOR FLOOR 1387 81000 0.02 ok BUILDING TOTAL 23418 75259 0.31 ok -- Sec. 504 and Table 5 -B The actual height of this building is 30. feet. The maximum height of the building is 65. feet. -- Table 5 -B Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 3 EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION Table 5 -A NORTH For Bearing Non - Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required B 1 hour 1 hour Not AllowedNon -Comb No A2.1 2 hour 2 hour Not AllowedNon -Comb No A3 2 hour 2 hour Not AllowedNon -Comb No EAST For Bearing Non - Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required B 1 hour 0 hour None Non -Comb No A2.1 1 hour 0 hour None Non -Comb No A3 1 hour 0 hour None Non -Comb No SOUTH For Bearing Non - Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required B 1 hour 0 hour None Non -Comb No A2.1 1 hour 0 hour None Non -Comb No A3 1 hour 0 hour None Non -Comb No WEST AREA SEPARATION WALL - See requirements listed later in this report. None -- No fire protection requirements for openings. 3/4 hour -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies. 50% of the area of the wall maximum. -- Table 5 -A, Footnote 5 & Sec. 503.2.2 Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft. with no dimension greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 713.8 Not Allowed -- Openings are not permitted in this wall. FOOTNOTES: 1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6 -A, footnote 1 4) Fire - retardant treated wood may be used within interior non - bearing 1 hr. wall assemblies. -- Table 6 -A, footnote 2 5) Nonload- bearing walls within a tenant space that are not part of a 1 hr. corridor may be of: a) Noncombustible (nonrated) materials b) Fire retardant - treated wood c) One -hour construction (any material) -- Sec. 601.5.2.1 8) If the entire roof structure is 25 feet or more above any floor, the fire rating may be allowed to be eliminated. See limitations and requirements. -- Sec. 603.5 & 602.5 Page # 4 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS Table 6 -A ELEMENT MATERIAL RATING NOTES Interior Bearing wall Noncombustible 1 hr Interior nonbrg wall Noncombustible 1 hr See Footnote #5 Structural Frame Noncombustible 1 hr Exterior Struct Frame Noncombustible 1 hr See footnote #1 Floor /Ceiling Assembly Noncombustible 1 hr Roof /Ceiling Assembly Noncombustible 1 hr See Footnote #8 Stairs Noncombustible None FOOTNOTES: 1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6 -A, footnote 1 4) Fire - retardant treated wood may be used within interior non - bearing 1 hr. wall assemblies. -- Table 6 -A, footnote 2 5) Nonload- bearing walls within a tenant space that are not part of a 1 hr. corridor may be of: a) Noncombustible (nonrated) materials b) Fire retardant - treated wood c) One -hour construction (any material) -- Sec. 601.5.2.1 8) If the entire roof structure is 25 feet or more above any floor, the fire rating may be allowed to be eliminated. See limitations and requirements. -- Sec. 603.5 & 602.5 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 5 PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES WALLS ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 709.6 Through penetrations: 1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly. -- Sec. 709.6.2 2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the required rating of the wall penetrated. -- Sec. 709.6.3 Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or masonry, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. -- Sec. 709.6.1 Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 709.7 Exceptions: 1. Steel electrical outlet boxes that do not exceed 16 square inches provided that the area of such openings does not exceed 100 square inches for any 100 square feet of wall area. Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24 inches. 2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can be confirmed that the fire - resistive integrity of wall is maintained. -- Sec. 709.7 Page # 6 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO FLOOR /CEILING AND ROOF /CEILING ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 710.2 Through pentrations: Through penetrations of fire - resistive horizontal assemblies shall be enclosed in fire - resistive shaft enclosures. -- Sec. 710.2.1 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire - assemblies. The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system. -- Sec. 710.2.3 Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the cavity of a wall do not require a T rating. Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 710.3 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, electrical outlet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents through concrete or masonry and the annular space is protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or protected to prevent the free passage of flame and products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100 square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without penetrations. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire - assemblies. 3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Fire - resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. -- Sec. 710.4 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 7 SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS -- Sec. 713.10 and 713.11 Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and servicing: 1. Penetrations through area separation walls. Penetrations through occupancy separations. 2. Penetrations of the fire - resistive construction of horizontal exit walls or corridors serving as a means of egress. Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required fire- resistive construction of corridors are not required to have smoke dampers when such ducts are of not less than 0.019 -inch thickness (26 gage) and have no openings serving the corridor. 3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures. Exceptions: 1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the airflow is upward. 2. Penetrations of a fire - resistive floor forming the base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire dampers listed for installation in the horizontal position. 3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust only, and is used for continuously operating fans. 4. Penetrations of the ceiling of fire- resistive floor - ceiling or roof- ceiling assemblies. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 5. Penetrations of an atrium enclosure element. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 6. Penetrations of exterior walls where protection of openings is required. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 7. Penetrations of areas of refuge. Exception: Ventilation system designed to supply outside air during an emergency. 8. Smoke dampers are required in smoke barriers and elevator lobbies. Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 8 DRAFT STOPS: If there is combustible construction in the floor /ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not exceed 1,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops does not exceed 60 feet. -- Sec. 708.3.1.1.3 When sprinklers are installed in the floor /ceiling space attic, the area may be 3,000 sq.ft. and the greatest horizontal dimension may be 100 feet. If there is combustible construction in the roof /ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not exceed 3,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops does not exceed 60 feet. -- Sec. 708.3.1.2.2 When sprinklers are installed in the attic, the area may be 9,000 sq.ft. and the greatest horizontal dimension may be 100 feet. OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS B -A2.1 1hr Offices a separation. -- Sec. B -A3 Ohr A2.1 -A3 Ohr -- Table 3 -B less than 25% of major use do not require 302.1 exc. 2.2 HEATING EQUIPMENT SEPARATION: FOR B OCCUPANCY: A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input. -- Sec. 302.5 FOR A2.1 OCCUPANCY: A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input. -- Sec. 302.5 FOR A3 OCCUPANCY: A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input. -- Sec. 302.5 ADDITIONAL SEPARATIONS: A refrigeration machinery room shall be separated from the remainder of the building as required for an H7 occupancy regardless of area. A horizontal occupancy separation may be limited to the actual floor area of the machinery room. Structural supporting elements shall be protected for the type of construction only. -- Sec. 2802 A 1 hour separation is required from an B occupancy. -- Table 3 -B FOR B OCCUPANCY: Laboratories and vocational shops containing hazardous materials are required to be separated from the rest of the building by not less than a 1 hr occupancy separation. -- Sec. 304.2.2.1 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO SECTION # 1 Page # 9 EXIT REQUIREMENTS: FL NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Offices 20 1 4.0 No N/A N/R 1 Auditorium E217 150 2 30.0 Yes N/A Out 4 1 Lab E218 64 2 12.8 No N/A Out 1 Lab 218a &b 58 2 11.6 No N/A Out 1 Lab E219 64 2 12.8 No N/A Out 1 Lab E219A 49 1 9.8 No N/A N/R 1 Lab E 220 63 2 12.6 No N/A Out 1 Lab E225 61 2 12.2 No N/A Out 1 Lab E231 51 2 10.2 No N/A Out 1 Lab E243 30 1 6.0 No N/A N/R 1 Auditorium Small 75 2 15.0 Yes N/A Out 4 1 Lab E245 30 1 6.0 No N/A N/R 1 Assembly Lobby Area 429 2 85.8 Yes N/A Out 4 1 Mechanical Room 2 1 0.4 No N/A N/R 1 Accessory AC20 1 4.0 No N/A N/R TOTAL 1146 4 229.2 Yes N/A Out B1 Mechanical Room 5 1 1.0 No N/A N/R TOTAL 5 2 1.5 No N/A N/R NOTE: Areas with 'AC' before the number of occupants area is being treated as an accessory for occupant loads. -- Sec. 1003.2.2.2.1, Exception In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. -- Sec. 1004.2.4 When 2 exits are required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible to go in either direction from any point in a corridor or hallway to a separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length. -- Sec. 1004.2.6 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 10 Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2 No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign. Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 1 Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted. Occupant load factor is based on Table 10 -A. Number of exits is based on Table 10 -A except as noted. Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10 -B Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits. -- Sec. 1003.2.3.2 Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components. Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components. Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways. -- Table 10 -B For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2 For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 FOOTNOTES: 4) Panic hardware is based on Sec. 1007.2.5 See exception for main exit in A -3 occupancies and churches. FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS: Manually operated edge- or surface - mounted flush bolts and surface bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or surface - mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 LOCKS AND LATCHES: Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 Key - locking hardware may be used on the main exit when the main exit consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked, door(s) must swing without operation of any latching device. -- exc. Page # 11 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO LANDINGS AT DOORS: 1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6 2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.7 TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit) The maximum travel distance in this building is 250 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5.2.3 Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2 BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: In offices (except health -care providers) and retail sales floors, with an aggregate area of not more than 3000 above or below the accessible floor need not be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.2 Exception Page # 12 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO 1) This building including each tenant shall be provided with at least one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of CABO /ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3 2) When more that one exit is required from any accessible space, each accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two accessible means of egress. -- Sec. 1104.1.1 3) When an exit stairway is part of an accessible means of egress, the stairway shall have a clear width of not less than 48 inches between the handrails. The stairway shall either incorporate an area of refuge within an enlarged story -level landing or shall be accessed from an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2 The area of refuge shall have direct access to the stairway that serves it. -- Sec. 1104.2.1 4) Each area of refuge shall be sized to accommodate one wheelchair space not less than 30 inches by 48 inches for each 200 occupants, or portion thereof. -- Sec. 1104.2.3 5) If the area of refuge is not within the stairway, it shall be separated from the rest of the story by a smoke barrier having at least a one - hour fire - resistance rating. Smoke barriers shall extend to the roof or floor deck above. Doors shall be smoke and draft control assemblies with a rating not less than 20 minutes. -- Sec. 1104.2.4 6) Two -way communications are required. -- Sec. 1104.2.5 7) Each area must be identified by a sign stating AREA OF REFUGE and the international symbol of accessibility. -- Sec. 1104.2.7 8) NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system are NOT required to incorporate an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2, Exception 2 ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class B or better. -- Table 15 -A 2) See section 1504 and ICBO research reports for requirements. Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page * 13 AREA SEPARATION WALL REQUIREMENTS: 1) The area separation wall is required to be a 2 hr fire assembly. Openings are limited to 25 percent of the length of the wall and protected with a 1 1/2 hour assembly. -- Sec. 504.6.2 2) If the building has a projection, 1 hr. protection is required on the exterior wall each side of the area separation wall equal to the depth of the projection. -- Sec. 504.6.3, exceptions If the projection has a concealed space at the area separation, wall, the area separation wall must extend through the projection. 3) If the area separation wall terminates at an inside corner, see the article in 'Building Standards' Sep /Oct 1982 for requirements. 4) A 30 inch high parapet wall is required above the roofing. -- Sec.504.6.4 See exceptions for alternate protection at roof. The faces shall be momcombustible for the uppermost 18 inches including counterflashing and coping materials. -- Sec. 504.6.5 5 ) See section 504.6.6 for requirements when an area separation wall separates buildings of different heights. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS: If there are 100 or more sprinklers, all valves controlling the water supply and water -flow switches shall be electrically monitored. Valve monitoring and water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station. -- Sec. 904.3.1 STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS: There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9 -A FOOTNOTES: 2) A standpipe is not required in the basement. -- Table 9 -A, footnote 1 VENTILATION: All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable of supplying a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 14 WALL AND CEILING FINISH: 1) Wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with Sec. 804.1 and Table 8 -B. 2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2 3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class I flame spread rating. and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8 -2 -- Sec. 805 4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches. -- Sec. 807.1.1 5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface. -- Sec. 807.1.2 INSULATION NOTES: 1) All insulation material including flame- spread rating of 25 or less -- Sec. 707.3 facings are required to have a and a maximum smoke density of 450. 2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. -- Sec. 2602 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: For B occupancy For A2.1 occupancy PLATFORMS: 1) Permanent platforms shall be constructed of materials as required for the building type of construction. -- Sec. 405.2 2) If the area under the platform is used for any purpose (including storage) other than equipment wiring or plumbing, then the floor construction shall be not less than 1 hour fire resistive. -- Sec. 405.2 For A3 occupancy PLATFORM: 1) Permanent platforms shall be constructed of materials as required for the building type of construction. -- Sec. 405.2 2) If the area under the platform is used for any purpose (including storage) other than equipment wiring or plumbing, then the floor construction shall be not less than 1 hour fire resistive. -- Sec. 405.2 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 15 Floor -1st Occupancy - Assembly Lobby Area 1 ) Provide a main exit and side exits on each side. The main exit shall of sufficient width to accommodate one half of the total occupant load but not less that the total required width of all aisles, exit passageways, and stairways leading thereto. The side exits shall be of sufficient width to accommodate one third of the total occupant load served. Side exits shall be accessible form a cross aisle. -- Sec. 1016.1 & 1016.2 When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to be posted at 429 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6 Floor -1st Occupancy- Auditorium E217 Floor -1st Occupancy- Auditorium Small Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 16 ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES: NOTE: Except as noted, section numbers listed below are from CABO /ANSI A117.1 - 1992 WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS: At least 50 percent of drinking fountains, but not less than one, provided on every floor shall be accessible. -- UBC Sec. 1105.4.1 Accessible units must comply with the following: 1) Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.2.1 2) Spout arranged for parallel approach shall be located 3 inches maximum from the front edge. Spouts of cantilevered units with knee and toe clearances shall be located 15 inches minimum from the vertical support and 5 inches maximum from the front edge. -- Sec. 4.15.2.2 3) Spouts shall provide a flow of water 4 inches height minimum. -- Sec. 4.15.2.3 4) Operable parts shall be located at or near the front edge of the unit and shall comply with 4.25.4 -- Sec. 4.15.3 5) A cantilevered unit is required to extend 17 inches minimum from the vertical support. Clear knee space must provide a clear area of 8 inches in depth at 27 inches high and 11 inches at 9 inches minimum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.4.1 6) Forward approach units shall comply with 4.2. Units in alcoves shall comply with 4.2.4.4. Units not having the necessary knee and toe clearance or clear space under them shall comply with 4.2.4 and have a clear floor space that allows a person in a wheelchair to make a parallel approach. -- Sec. 4.15.4.2 TOILET FACILITIES: 1) A 60 inch diameter unobstructed turning space is required in the toilet room. -- Sec. 4.16.3, 4.2.3 & Fig. B4.2.3 2) Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wall or partition. The distance from the side wall or partition to the centerline of the water closet shall be 18 in. Sec. 4.17.1 3) When the accessible water closet is not in a stall: The clear floor space shall be 48 in minimum in front of the water closet and 42 in from the center line of the water closet on the side not adjacent to the wall. -- Sec. 4.17.2 & Fig. B4.17.2 4) When the accessible water closet is in a stall: The stall shall be 60 in wide minimum and 56 in deep minimum for wall hung water closets and 59 in deep minimum for floor mounted water closets. -- Sec. 4.18.3.1 If the door swings into the stall, the required depth shall be increased by 36 inches minimum. -- Sec. 4.18.3.2 & Fig. B4.18.3.1 5) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor and shall be provided on the rear wall and on the side wall closest to the water closet. -- Sec. 4.24.2.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4 and B4.18.3.1 a) Side grab bar is required to start within 12 inches of the back wall and extend to 54 inches from the back wall. (The minimum length of the bar is 42 in) -- Sec. 4.17.4.1 & Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 17 Figs. B4.17.3 and B4.18.3.1 b) The rear bar shall be 24 in long minimum, centered on the water closet. Where space permits, the bar shall be 36 in long minimum, with the additional length provided on the transfer side. -- Sec. 4.17.4.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4 and B4.18.3.1 6) The top of the seat on the water closet is required to be 17 to 19 inches above the floor. -- Sec. 4.17.3 & Fig. B4.17.3 7) Accessible urinals shall be of the stall type or wall hung with the rim at 17 inches maximum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.19.2 8) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches minimum is required in front of the urinal. Privacy shields shall not extend beyond the front edge of the urinal rim, unless they are 30 inches apart minimum. -- Sec. 4.19.3 9) Accessible lavatories shall be mounted with the rim 34 inches maximum above the floor and a clearance of 29 inches minimum from the floor to the bottom of the front edge of the apron. -- Sec. 4.20.2.1 & Fig. B4.20.3.1 10) It shall extend 17 inches minimum from the wall. The clear knee space shall be 8 inches in depth minimum at 27 inches minimum above the floor and 11 inches in depth minimum at 9 in minimum above the floor. The dip of the overflow shall be ignored when checking the clearances. -- Sec. 4.20.3.1 & Fig. B4.20.3.1 11) A clear floor space of 30 X 48 inches minimum shall be provided in front of the lavatory and shall extend 19 inches maximum under the lavatory. -- Sec. 4.20.3.2 & Fig. B4.20.3.2 12) Water supply and drain pipes under lavatories shall be insulated or otherwise treated to protect against contact. -- Sec. 4.20.4 13) The bottom of mirror is required to be within 38 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.16.6 & Fig. B4.20.3.1 SECTION # 2 SEPARATION DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE NORTH Building 8.0 Feet EAST Separation wall 0.0 Feet SOUTH Property line 100.0 Feet WEST Building 50.0 Feet Allowable area increased 37.5% for open -- Sec. 505.1 FIRE PROTECTION 4.0 Feet 0.0 Feet 100.0 Feet 25.0 Feet area on 2 sides. Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 18 FL NAME OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 G.H. 233 B ok 1781 11000 0.16 ok 1 G.H. 233C B ok 175 11000 0.02 ok 1 G.H. 235 Ul ok 1221 1375 0.89 ok 1 G.H. 235A U1 ok 1767 1375 1.29 OVER 1 G.H. 235B U1 ok 1775 1375 1.29 OVER 1 G.H. 235C U1 ok 1775 1375 1.29 OVER 1 G.H. 235D Ul ok 1755 1375 1.28 OVER 1 G.H. 235E U1 ok 728 1375 0.53 ok 1 G.H. 235F U1 ok 1048 1375 0.76 ok 1 G.H. 235G Ul ok 1933 1375 1.41 OVER TOTAL FOR FLOOR 13958 1567 8.91 OVER WARNING -- This floor is over the allowed area. BUILDING TOTAL 13958 1567 8.91 OVER -- Sec. 504 and Table 5 -B WARNING -- This building is over the allowed area. NOTE: The total area of U1 areas exceeds 3000 square feet. U1 areas over 3000 square feet must be changed to S3 or area separation walls must be added with no more than 3000 square feet in each area. -- Sec. 312.2.2 The actual height of this building is 22. feet. The maximum height of the building is 40. feet. -- Table 5 -B Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 19 EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION Table 5 -A NORTH For Bearing Non - Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required U1 0 hour 0 hour None Any No B 1 hour 1 hour Not Allowed Any Yes EAST AREA SEPARATION WALL - See requirements listed later in this report. SOUTH For Bearing Non - Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required U1 0 hour 0 hour None Any No B 0 hour 0 hour None Any No WEST For Bearing Non - Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required U1 0 hour 0 hour None Any No B 0 hour 0 hour None Any No One hour exterior walls may be protected only on the exterior side in a U1 occupancy. -- Sec. 503.4.8 None -- No fire protection requirements for openings. 3/4 hour -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies. 500 of the area of the wall maximum. -- Table 5 -A, Footnote 5 & Sec. 503.2.2 Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft. with no dimension greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 713.8 Not Allowed -- Openings are not permitted in this wall. FOOTNOTES: 1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6 -A, footnote 1 Page # 20 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS Table 6 -A ELEMENT MATERIAL RATING NOTES Interior Bearing wall Any 0 hr Interior nonbrg wall Any 0 hr See Footnote #5 Structural Frame Any 0 hr Exterior Struct Frame Any 0 hr See footnote #1 Floor /Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr Roof /Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr See Footnote #8 Stairs Any None FOOTNOTES: 1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6 -A, footnote 1 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 21 PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES WALLS ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 709.6 Through penetrations: 1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly. -- Sec. 709.6.2 2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the required rating of the wall penetrated. -- Sec. 709.6.3 Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or masonry, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. -- Sec. 709.6.1 Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 709.7 Exceptions: 1. Steel electrical outlet boxes that do not exceed 16 square inches provided that the area of such openings does not exceed 100 square inches for any 100 square feet of wall area. Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24 inches. 2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can be confirmed that the fire - resistive integrity of wall is maintained. -- Sec. 709.7 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 22 FLOOR /CEILING AND ROOF /CEILING ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 710.2 Through pentrations: Through penetrations of fire - resistive horizontal assemblies shall be enclosed in fire - resistive shaft enclosures. -- Sec. 710.2.1 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire - assemblies. The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system. -- Sec. 710.2.3 Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the cavity of a wall do not require a T rating. Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 710.3 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, electrical outlet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents through concrete or masonry and the annular space is protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or protected to prevent the free passage of flame and products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100 square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without penetrations. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire - assemblies. 3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Fire - resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. -- Sec. 710.4 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 23 SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS -- Sec. 713.10 and 713.11 Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and servicing: 1. Penetrations through area separation walls. Penetrations through occupancy separations. 2. Penetrations of the fire - resistive construction of horizontal exit walls or corridors serving as a means of egress. Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required fire - resistive construction of corridors are not required to have smoke dampers when such ducts are of not less than 0.019 -inch thickness (26 gage) and have no openings serving the corridor. 3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures. Exceptions: 1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the airflow is upward. 2. Penetrations of a fire - resistive floor forming the base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire dampers listed for installation in the horizontal position. 3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust only, and is used for continuously operating fans. 4. Penetrations of the ceiling of fire - resistive floor - ceiling or roof - ceiling assemblies. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 5. Penetrations of an atrium enclosure element. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 6. Penetrations of exterior walls where protection of openings is required. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 7. Penetrations of areas of refuge. Exception: Ventilation system designed to supply outside air during an emergency. 8. Smoke dampers are required in smoke barriers and elevator lobbies. DRAFT STOPS: If there is combustible construction in the roof /ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not exceed 3,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops does not exceed 60 feet. -- Sec. 708.3.1.2.2 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS -- Table 3 -B Ul -B lhr Page # 24 HEATING EQUIPMENT SEPARATION: FOR U1 OCCUPANCY: FOR B OCCUPANCY: A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input. -- Sec. 302.5 ADDITIONAL SEPARATIONS: A refrigeration machinery room shall be separated from the remainder of the building as required for an H7 occupancy regardless of area. A horizontal occupancy separation may be limited to the actual floor area of the machinery room. Structural supporting elements shall be protected for the type of construction only. -- Sec. 2802 A 3 hour separation is required from an Ul occupancy. -- Table 3 -B SECTION # 2 EXIT REQUIREMENTS: FL NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 G.H. 233 18 1 3.6 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 233C 2 1 0.4 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235 12 1 2.4 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235A 18 1 3.6 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235B 18 1 3.6 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235C 18 1 3.6 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235D 18 1 3.6 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235E 7 1 1.4 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235F 10 1 2.0 No N/A N/R 1 G.H. 235G 19 1 3.8 No N/A N/R TOTAL 140 2 28.0 No N/A Out In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. -- Sec. 1004.2.4 When 2 exits are required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible to go in either direction from any point in a corridor or hallway to a separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length. -- Sec. 1004.2.6 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 25 Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2 No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign. Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 1 Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted. Occupant load factor is based on Table 10 -A. Number of exits is based on Table 10 -A except as noted. Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10 -B Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits. -- Sec. 1003.2.3.2 Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components. Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components. Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways. -- Table 10 -B For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2 For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 FOOTNOTES: FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS: Manually operated edge- or surface - mounted flush bolts and surface bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or surface - mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 LOCKS AND LATCHES: Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 26 LANDINGS AT DOORS: 1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6 2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.7 TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit) The maximum travel distance in this building is 200 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5.2.1 Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 27 BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: 1) This building including each tenant shall be provided with at least one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of CABO /ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3 2) When more that one exit is required from any accessible space, each accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two accessible means of egress. -- Sec. 1104.1.1 3) When an exit stairway is part of an accessible means of egress, the stairway shall have a clear width of not less than 48 inches between the handrails. The stairway shall either incorporate an area of refuge within an enlarged story -level landing or shall be accessed from an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2 The area of refuge shall have direct access to the stairway that serves it. -- Sec. 1104.2.1 4) Each area of refuge shall be sized to accommodate one wheelchair space not less than 30 inches by 48 inches for each 200 occupants, or portion thereof. -- Sec. 1104.2.3 5) If the area of refuge is not within the stairway, it shall be separated from the rest of the story by a smoke barrier having at least a one - hour fire - resistance rating. Smoke barriers shall extend to the roof or floor deck above. Doors shall be smoke and draft control assemblies with a rating not less than 20 minutes. -- Sec. 1104.2.4 6) Two -way communications are required. -- Sec. 1104.2.5 7) Each area must be identified by a sign stating AREA OF REFUGE and the international symbol of accessibility. -- Sec. 1104.2.7 8) NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system are NOT required to incorporate an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2, Exception 2 ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1) The roofing on this building is not required to be fire retardant. -- Table 15 -A 2) See section 1504 and ICBO research reports for requirements. Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 28 AREA SEPARATION WALL REQUIREMENTS: 1) The area separation wall is required to be a 2 hr fire assembly. Openings are limited to 25 percent of the length of the wall and protected with a 1 1/2 hour assembly. -- Sec. 504.6.2 2) If the building has a projection, 1 hr. protection is required on the exterior wall each side of the area separation wall equal to the depth of the projection. -- Sec. 504.6.3, exceptions If the projection has a concealed space at the area separation, wall, the area separation wall must extend through the projection. 3) If the area separation wall terminates at an inside corner, see the article in 'Building Standards' Sep /Oct 1982 for requirements. 4) A 30 inch high parapet wall is required above the roofing. -- Sec.504.6.4 See exceptions for alternate protection at roof. The faces shall be momcombustible for the uppermost 18 inches including counterflashing and coping materials. -- Sec. 504.6.5 5 ) See section 504.6.6 for requirements when an area separation wall separates buildings of different heights. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS: STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS: There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9 -A FOOTNOTES: VENTILATION: All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable of supplying a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1 Page # 29 Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO WALL AND CEILING FINISH: 1) Wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with Sec. 804.1 and Table 8 -B. 2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2 3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class I flame spread rating. and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8 -2 -- Sec. 805 4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches. -- Sec. 807.1.1 5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface. -- Sec. 807.1.2 INSULATION NOTES: 1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a flame- spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450 unless it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. 707.3 exc.2 2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. -- Sec. 2602 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: For U1 occupancy 1) The minimum clear height is required to be 7 feet. -- Sec. 312.2.3 For B occupancy Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 30 ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES: NOTE: Except as noted, section numbers listed below are from CABO /ANSI A117.1 - 1992 WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS: At least 50 percent of drinking fountains, but not less than one, provided on every floor shall be accessible. -- UBC Sec. 1105.4.1 Accessible units must comply with the following: 1) Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.2.1 2) Spout arranged for parallel approach shall be located 3 inches maximum from the front edge. Spouts of cantilevered units with knee and toe clearances shall be located 15 inches minimum from the vertical support and 5 inches maximum from the front edge. -- Sec. 4.15.2.2 3) Spouts shall provide a flow of water 4 inches height minimum. -- Sec. 4.15.2.3 4) Operable parts shall be located at or near the front edge of the unit and shall comply with 4.25.4 -- Sec. 4.15.3 5) A cantilevered unit is required to extend 17 inches minimum from the vertical support. Clear knee space must provide a clear area of 8 inches in depth at 27 inches high and 11 inches at 9 inches minimum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.4.1 6) Forward approach units shall comply with 4.2. Units in alcoves shall comply with 4.2.4.4. Units not having the necessary knee and toe clearance or clear space under them shall comply with 4.2.4 and have a clear floor space that allows a person in a wheelchair to make a parallel approach. -- Sec. 4.15.4.2 TOILET FACILITIES: 1) A 60 inch diameter unobstructed turning space is required in the toilet room. -- Sec. 4.16.3, 4.2.3 & Fig. B4.2.3 2) Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wall or partition. The distance from the side wall or partition to the centerline of the water closet shall be 18 in. Sec. 4.17.1 3) When the accessible water closet is not in a stall: The clear floor space shall be 48 in minimum in front of the water closet and 42 in from the center line of the water closet on the side not adjacent to the wall. -- Sec. 4.17.2 & Fig. B4.17.2 4) When the accessible water closet is in a stall: The stall shall be 60 in wide minimum and 56 in deep minimum for wall hung water closets and 59 in deep minimum for floor mounted water closets. -- Sec. 4.18.3.1 If the door swings into the stall, the required depth shall be increased by 36 inches minimum. -- Sec. 4.18.3.2 & Fig. B4.18.3.1 5) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor and shall be provided on the rear wall and on the side wall closest to the water closet. -- Sec. 4.24.2.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4 and B4.18.3.1 a) Side grab bar is required to start within 12 inches of the back wall and extend to 54 inches from the back wall. (The minimum length of the bar is 42 in) -- Sec. 4.17.4.1 & Code review for: Project Id.: Bensen Addition Address: BYU IDAHO Page # 32 GLAZING REQUIREMENTS All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4 Locations: 1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies. 2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. 3) Glazing in storm doors. 4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors. 5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. 6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 -inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the following conditions: A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet. B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor. C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor. D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. 8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface. Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill panels. 9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than 60 inches above the pool side and the glazing is within 5 feet of the pool or spa water's edge. 10) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of then bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. +i�� P.O. Box 280 12 North Center Street a O Rexburg, Idaho 83440 a Phone (208) 359 -3020 STATE OF IDAHO Fax (208) 359 -3022 9g �ISMEO w ww.ci.rexburgJd.us id . us e -mail rexburg @ci.rexburg.id.us 7/19/2002 Brian Hauff CTA Architects 1185 Grove Street Boise, ID 83702 Dear Brian, Sorry for taking so long to get back with you. Typically we have an approximate time of turn around on plan review of about 2 weeks from submittal. Recently that time interval has increased to a little. The last few days have been extremely busy for us. I have reviewed the plans for Bensen Building Addition at the BYU -Idaho campus and have identified the following discrepancies: 1. According to the code analysis on sheet F101 a possible additional 591 students could occupy the building, therefore an additional 148 parking spaces would be need to be provided. The University has plans to increase parking on an entire campus level. Therefore, an additional parking lot is not required in close proximity to the building. However, additional handicapped parking is still required. ADA requirements identify the need for 5 additional handicapped parking spaces. 2. Our policy on storm drainage requires that you submit us with a plan on how you will handle the additional storm runoff created by the addition. This plan must address the storm water detention so that the new flows into the City storm sewer are metered to meet those existing prior to construction. The plan submitted does not meet our criteria. 3. Provide information on fire -rated door and window assemblies. I didn't see a door schedule. We will need detailed information on all doors in the rated corridor as well as those at the area separation wall. The existing door near the middle entrance between the two buildings will need to be rated due to its proximity to the addition. 4. Provide a handicapped ramp at the North entry. As the design is now, only stairs are existing at this entrance. 5. The handicapped ramp at the East entry does not have 5' wide landings as required by ANSI Al 17.1 -1998, Section 405.7.4. The landings must be 5' wide in each direction. 6. I have attached a list of discrepancies identified by our new Mechanical Inspector as well as a report created by the Fire Department. Please return two sets of corrected plans. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 359 -3020 ext. 324. Sincerely Val Christensen Building Official C.C. John Millar Chris Huskinson Bill Hamlin Lloyd Bensen City Of Rexburg, Idaho Building Department Mechanical Section MR -1: (General Conditions -Sec. 14 —1 &2) The Owner, A/E, and Contractor will recognize the need of the City by be apprised of all Change Orders, Field Directives, etc. (without cost factors) in order that they may be reviewed to ensure that the intent of the Codes, are recognized, or provided for. MR -2: (General Conditions- Sec. 17 -A 1,2 &3- Inspecton of Work.) The Contractor of Project Coordinator shall notify the City of work in all instances of Systems and piping in progress and status so that the work may be viewed prior to backfill and incorporation into the project. Additionally, the City shall be advised when special inspections are scheduled and City Inspectors are invited to view the inspection and receive all reports generated there from. A list of all firms engaged by the owners, A/E, or contractor shall be provided the City, along with the approved Sub - Contractor list as soon as those parties are identified. MR- 3:(General Conditions- Section 20- G,K,L,O,P &R) The Owner, A/E, or Contractor, shall notify the City when any need is apparent, and at the time work is begun regarding any of the Safety Issues cited above , enabling the City to view the work in progress. MP -4: (General Conditions - Section 42- Contractor's Quality Control B. Asbestos) Discovery of Asbestos (Definition expanded to include any HAZMAT as defined by CFR) shall require the contractor to notify the City at the same time as notification is provided the Owner, and the Project Coordinator, or Owner shall provide, upon completion of abatement, documentation of completion of abatement and documentation of legal and proper disposal of materials. MP -5 (Supplemental Conditions -Sec. 1.3 A,B, &C. Work Restrictions) Owner, Project Coordinator, and Contractor shall advise City Building Official of intent and secure temporary occupancy, based upon a then - submitted schedule and define scope of occupancy, together with a Contractor's safety plan for the public, students and staff. MR -6: (Supplemental General Conditions -Sec. 1.6 -13- Industry Standards 1 &2.) While the Building Department recognizes the intent of this section, please modify, by addendum or Plan Revision, all the Codes and year of Code implementation this design was intended to comply with for purpose of dispute avoidance with the Building Department. (UBC 1997, !MC 2000, etc.) MR -7: ( Supplemental General Conditions - Selective Demolition- Total.) The Owner, Owner's Demolition an/or Abatement Contractor and Monitoring Lab and Disposal Contractor shall notify work start and provide the City, at a minimum, all land -fill disposal certifications and Air Monitoring Clearances in a timely manner in order that the public trust is provided for. MR -8: Addendum No. l was included in the City's copy of Project Manual #7. The Architect shall provide a copy of any later Addendums and copies of revised prints as they are generated. MR -9: (Division 15) The Specifications note that the Owner may entertain substitutions for packaged, or Modular HVAC Units. Additionally, the criteria for installation and execution rely upon the "Manufacturer's Direction/Instructions ", rather than direction from the A/E. In order to ensure effective Review, Inspection and Field Acceptance satisfactory to the Code and the Public Trust and archival responsibilities the A/E will provide the City Building Dept. copies of the approved submittal, prior to ordering the equipment. This will avoid questions and concerns at the time of on -site install. MR -10 (Supplemental General Requirements -Sec 1.4 Alternates -B Schedule of Alternates.) The Architect will notify, in writing, of the acceptance of any of the Alternates (1 -4) listed, to enable specific review and/or approval and incorporation under the Permit. MR -11: (Building Permit Application.) Approval of Permit is conditional upon the following: Subsequent to "Award of Contract ", and prior to issuance of "Notice to Proceed" (or it's equivalent), The Owners, A/E, & Contractor will meet with the Jurisdictional Authority (City of Rexburg Building Official) at the City Offices for a "Meeting of Understanding" (DoD Precedent) to set procedural formats and discuss means of cooperation whose goals are to reduce, if not eliminate, development of "Adversarial Roles" and foster " Advocacy Roles ". Contractor and Jurisdictional personnel should include both management and field members. End of Mechanical Review (MR) Notes REXBURG MADISON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 280 26 North Center Rexburg, Idaho 83440 (208) 359 -3010 1997 Uniform Fire Code Plan Date: 6 -28 -02 Plan Review Review Date: 7 -2 -02 Building Name: BENSON BUILDING, BYU -I Building Address: CENTER STREET, BYU -I CAMPUS Stories: 1 Type of Construction: II -1 HOUR Occupancy Classification: A -3, B Existing Floor Area: 61,819 SQ. FT. New Construction Floor Area: 24,805 SQUARE FEET (TOTAL OF 86,624 SQUARE FEET 1).Required Fire Flow (Appendix III -A): 1,562 GPM /TWO HOURS BASED ON THIS NEW ADDITION BEING FULLY SPRINKLERED. Comments: NONE 2).Water Supply (Article 9, Section 903) Required: YES Fire Hydrant Location: OKAY Fire Hydrant Flows: NEW HYDRANT FLOWS UNKNOWN, NEED ESTIMATE FROM ENGINEER Fire Flow Test Location: EXISTING LOCATIONS Fire Flow Supplied By: FD Other Approved Water Source: NONE Water Supply Acceptable: YES Fire Hydrant Location Acceptable: YES Water Supply Comments: HYDRANT ACCESS ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING MUST BE MAINTAINED YEAR AROUND. 3.)Fire Apparatus Access Roads (Article 9 Section 902) Required: YES Acceptable: Width: NO Length: YES Surface: YES Turning Radius: YES Grade: YES Clearance: YES Turn Arounds: YES Complete Road Acceptable: NO Comments: IS THIS AN ACCESS ROAD OR A SIDEWALK? I FORESEE DIFFIUCLTY IN TURNING AN APPARATUS AROUND ON THE 14 WIDE ZZ ROAD . PLEASE FURNISH COMMENTS ON THIS SUBJECT. 4).Access Roads and Water Supply, Including Fire Hydrants Are Required To Be Installed And Made Serviceable Prior To And During Time Of Construction (Article 9 Section 901.3): YES Comments: IF NOT INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND MADE SERVICEABLE A STOP WORK ORDER WILL BE ISSUED. 5),Installation Of Portable Fire Extinguisher (Article 10 Section 1002) Required: YES Location Acceptable: YES Type Provided Acceptable: MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE 2A10BC Comments: 6).Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems: (Article 10 Section 1003 Required: YES Type Of System Being Installed: WET SYSTEM Sprinkler System Monitoring Required (Article 10 Section 1003.3) Required: YES Comments: SUBMIT PLANS TO STATE FIRE MARSHAL 7).Standpipes (Article 10 Section 1004) Required: NO Type Required: Comments: 8).Ventilating Hood And Duct Fire Extinguishing System (Article 10 Section 1006.2) Required: NO Type Being Provided: Automatic Fuel Shutoff Shown (Article 10 Section 1006.2.4): Portable Fire Extinguisher Shown (Article 10 section 1006.2.7): Comments: 9).Fire Alarm Systems (Article 10 Section 1007)Required: YES Type Of System Required: Manual: Automatic: Both: YES Type Of System Being Provided: Manual: Automatic: Both: YES Components Of System Shown: Smoke Detectors: X Heat Detectors: X Manual Pull Station: X Sounding Devices: X Visual Devices: X Door Holders: X Duct Detectors: X Flow Alarm: Sprinkler Valve Monitoring: Fire Alarm System Acceptable: NO Comments: I SPORE WITH SCOTT OF CTA ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS ABOUT REVISIONS OF THE ALARM COMPONENTS. HE AGREED TO THE CHANGES AND WILL DRAFT A NEW SET OF DRAWINGS. ALSO REQUIRED WILL BE POWER CONENCTION, BATTERY CALCULATIONS, CONDUCTOR TYPE AND SIZES, VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS, MANUFACTURERS, MODEL NUMBERS AND LISTING INFORMATION FOR EQUIPMENT, DEVICES AND MATERIALS, INTERFACE OF FIRE SAFETY CONTROL FUNCTIONS, ETC. 10).Other Corrections That Are Required By Special Occupancy Or Conditions: AS NOTED IN ABOVE NARRATIVE Plans As Submitted Are Acceptable: NO Plans Checked By: CHRIS HUSKINSON Date: 7 -2 -02 Please furnish comments back to the plan reviewer in the following manner: Written Comments: X New Plans: X Ju1.25. 2002 2:12PM T A RCHITECTS ENGINELRS Date July 25, 2002 To City of Rexburg Attention Val Christiansen Sent By Brian HaufF Project Benson Building Addition Job Ref. ; BYUBNSN Fax No. 208.359.3022 Pages Sent 25 (including this cover sheet) Hard Copy Will follow x Will not follow Encl. . Owner review comments and responses No.5653 P. 1/25 Val, Per your request, here are the responses to BYU Idaho's Owner Review Comments. These have been implemented to the drawings and specifications as shown in these responses. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thanks, Brian Hauff, AIA Project Manager CTA Architects Engineers g:1byubnan\documentslcorrV9x fom) - city of rexburg- 7-25-02, doe CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 208. 336. 4900 Pam: 208. 343. 3531 http: / /www.ctagroup.com E -mail: boiseinfo@ctagcoup.com Page 1 Ju 125. 2002 2:12PM � � jUOj .V.) r,�No • 56 531 P • 2/25 TRANSMITTAL LE TIER (cunt.) Comment: E235F — soil 24" Deep Response: To be corrected by Addendum-1. Comment= E233C — Door should be on the North of room instead of the South. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1, Comment: How do you exit the building and access the storage room? Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. The exterior door will be removed and an interior door will be added. Comment: . Confused about the sink style & position in the head house. Are there 5 sinks? Could you locate further east of the doorway? Response: There will be a correction from 3 sinks to 2 sinks by Addendum-1. Their location cannot be further east because of: 1. Electrical panels east of the doorway 2_ Lack of sanitary sewer line on the east Comment: What is a "V" Groove on detail 10/A204? Response: This in the EIFS is for accent lines on the building. Comment: We would prefer Argus or Prevera control systems in the Greenhouse. Response: This has been passed on to the Greenhouse consultant, Comment: Change furnished by owner to furnished by contractor and delete Kiddie and add in preferred brand name — Ansul 10 lb. ABC. Response: We can change to Furnished by Contractor but this will increase the budget. There will be a correction of Kiddie to Ansul by Addendum -1. Comment: Exterior wall for skylight shows 5/8 gyp bd with EPDM as exterior finish. Review and spec a the backer - board or an exterior product. g: lb yUbnsnldocumsntslcorrltransmittal letter - nylon nielson 07 -11,dm Page 2 CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 208. 336. 4900 Fax: 208, 343, 3531 http: / /www•ctagroup.com E -mail: boiscinfo®ctagroup.com JuI-25, 2002 2;12PM No•5653 P- 3/25 TRANSMITTAL LETTER (cont.) Response: The 5/8" type `x' gyp, bd. is an exterior product. Comment: Provide detail and spec for picture rail in halls. Response: , There will be a correction by Addendum -1. Comment: Toilet Accessories TA108 / TA109 (book / coat racks) should be contractor furnished and installed. Response: These are the same items used in the labs and they are Owner furnished and Contactor installed. Comment: Carpet installed shall be certified to install "Lees" Unibond Backed Carpets and Mannington" Delta AB Backer Carpet and carpet tile for both companies. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: Specify "Schlage Primes" key system. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: Specify "American Seating Co." as the preferred. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1 _ Comment: Titles on prints should match. Response. To be corrected by a re- issued set to the successful contractor. Comment: Section bubbles on F101 should have an "A" in front of 301. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: Two section bubbles on F101 have the same number_ Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. g:l 6yubnanldocumen talearrAmnsmittal letter rulon nlelson 07- 1I.doc Page 3 CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grovc Strcet Boise, Idaho 83702 208, 336, 4900 Fax: 208. 343- 3531 http : / /www.ctagoup -coin )_mail: boiseinfo@ctagroup.com Jul-25, 2002 2:12PM TRANSMITTAL LETTER (coat.) No.5653 P. 4/25 Comment: Construction staging area on south end (A001) conflicts w/ fire lane shown on 6201 _ Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: Detail symbols refer to wrong details on sheet A004 & A005. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: Detail symbol on sheet A100 needs numbers in it. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: Sheet A101 has two detail symbols (1/A107). Response: There are actually three symbols with similar call outs (1/A107, 1/A701 & 7/A107). Comment Al 0 1 — Detail symbol 3/A308 refers to a non - existent detail. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A308 — there are three details with the same number- Response To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment Al 02 — There are two symbols (30/A109) the same. Response: These are correct -- One is 'Similar" to the other. Comment: A109 — The detail 2/A601 should be 2/A602. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A303 — The detail 7/A307 should be 6/A306. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -l. g: lbyubnsn\ documentalcorr� tranamittalletter- fulonnielsorl 07- 97.doc Page 4 CTA Axchitects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boisc, Idaho 83702 208, 336, 4900 F= 208. 343. 3531 http: / /www.etWoup.com E -mail: Waeinfo @ctagroup.coxn Jul,25, 2002 .2:12PM TRANSMITTAL LETTER (cone.) No 5653 P. 5/25 Comment: A305 — The detail symbol (10/F102) refers to a non - existent sheet. Response This is correct. It is possible that Brett Johnson's set of prints do not have a F102 sheet and this should be checked out. Comment: A/308 — The wall section detail reads 2/A60. Response. To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A401 — The east entry ramp detail is 5/A403_ This is wrong. Response: This is correct. Comment: A402 — All detail symbols on this sheet should read A402 and not A401. Response: To be corrected by Addendum-1. Comment: A601 — Detail "J" should have a section symbol reading 1 /A603 and not 123/A603. Response, To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: The 800 sheets — the plan views have an "X" in their symbols. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A900 -- The symbol with the overall ceiling plan should read 1/A900 not l/A102. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A901 .— Check the section symbols @ the sky bridge after the details have been corrected on A308. 9:l byubnsnWacumentakcorrNlrenamittal letter - rulon nielson 07.11,doc Page 5 CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 208. 336, 4900 Fax: 208, 343. 3531 http, / /www,ctagroi4p.com E -mail: boiseWo@ctagroup . com Jul-25. 2002 2:13PM TRANSMITTAL LETTER (cont,) Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A902 — 1/A901 should read 1/A902. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment: A903 have incorrect symbol call -outs. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1 _ No,5653 P. 6/25 Comment: F101 — The horn strobes have numbers but not notes on this sheet to designate them_ Response: This information is located on E100 (Legend) and the E400 sheets_ Comment: F102 — there are a lot of details but no references on the sheets. Response: The details are used in many locations and so frequently that noting where they apply is not practical. These details are to be followed when applicable. Comment: F101/102 —Where are sheets 3 &4? Response: The four sheets referred to in the title block are for sheets G101, F101, F102 & R101. Comment: A002, A003, A004 & A005 — Note "M" is covered in note "E ". Response: These notes are covering two different issues and should be kept for the good of the project. Comment: A001 Note "H" is unclear. Response: What is unclear about the note? Comment: A100 - Wall type notes: Where are they keyed? Response: They are keyed from sheet A001. g:l byubnsn %documents�corrltransniittai letter - rulon nielson 0r -1 MOO Page 6 CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83 702 208. 336, 4900 Fax: 208. 343. 3531 bttp: / /www.ctagroup.com E -mail: boiseiufo@rctaUoup.com Jul-25. 2002 2:13PM TRANSMITTAL LETTER (cant.) No.5653 P. 7/25 Comment- Al 02 & A502 Do the doors from E2D Corridor need to swing the other way or be on hold opens? Response: . These doors swing the correct way and are not to be on hold opens_ Comment: A105 Detail 4 needs a leaf cap on the overflow drain. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1. Comment All 05 — The EPDM is to be fully adhered. Response: This roofing material is to be mechanically attached but a clarification note can be added to the prints saying — "Fully adhered at all vertical surfaces ". To make a change requiring a fully adhered roof would be a budget issue. See spec. section 07531, page 9, (3.6D). Comment: A104 -- What material is being used in note 13 Response: The spec, section is 07531, page 6, (2.8A). the print at note 13. Comment Al 05 — Detail 9 — Add lap sealant note. Response: Where is the note to be added? There is nothing in the spec, We will also give a clarification note on Comment: A105 — Detail 4 — overflow drain. There is no roof plumbing plan but we need one. Response; Please see sheet A104. Comment: A106 — The landscape storage building is not on the site plan C102_ Response: This building is on C201. Comment: A109 — Detail 25 —Add a note in the spec. "All CMU to be solid grouted "_ Response: A clarification note will be added to the prints and structural covers that speck area. g: Nbyubnsn ldocumentslcorrltransmlttal letter- rulon nlelson 07 -1Uoc Page 7 CTA Architects Engineers 1 185 Grove Street 'Boise, Idaho 83702 208, 336. 4900 Fax: 208, 343. 3531 http: / /www.ctagroup.com E -mail: boiseinio@ctagroup.com Jul-25. 2002 2:13PM No.5653 P. 8/25 TRANSMITTAL LETTER (cont.) Comment. A502 — Detail 6 — If corner guard is plastic (clear) like we usually use, then the chair rail should go to the corner. Response. The corner guard being used is a heavy duty guard such as used in hospitals. Comment: Greenhouse — An outdoor hose bib is needed on the landscape storage shed. Response: To be corrected by Addendum -1, Comment: Greenhouse — Outdoor light on the landscape storage shed_ Response: This is covered on the E203 and note #6. Comment. Does the room E231 B have positive air pressure? Response: Yes. Comment: Greenhouse — The head house has floor drains and not trench drains. Response There was a concern about the depth of the underground sewer line so floor drains were put on the prints. If the line is deeper to allow for a trench drain then that could be added if desired by the customer_ The floor drains would be easier to maintain. Comment: Greenhouse — There is a need for a floor drain in the cooler floor. Response: We will check out this issue more closely but our plan does account for a floor sink for the cooler condensing unit. Comment: Greenhouse — RO water in the cooling system? Response: RO water is not a good idea in the cooling system. Comment: Greenhouse — RO Water in the hose bibs. Response: There are stub outs into the Greenhouse for the contractor to connect to and he will be able to design their use and location_ g:\ byubnan \dooumentalcorr\transmittal letter - rulon nlelson 07- 11.doc Page 8 CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 208. 336, 4900 Fax: 208. 343. 3531 http' / /www- ctagroup.com E -mail: boiseinfb@ctagroup_com JuI-25- 2002 2:I3PM No-5653 P- 9/25 TRANSMITTAL LETTER (conk) Comment: Greenhouse — Hose bibs on the south walls, east walls, west walls, inside and out. Response: The number and location of these hose bibs are according to Max and are different from the professors' desires. Comment: Greenhouse — House .Z & 3 have under -bench hot water. heat and we would like to eliminate the ebb and flow benches and go with all rolling benches. Response: These issues have been passed on to the Greenhouse consultant. Comment: Greenhouse -- Concerns about drainage for the west side of the greenhouse. Response: Unless there is a membrane or a concrete slab under the soil, all the water should go into the ground. Comment: Greenhouse — There is a fan jet / HAF concern based on our information. Response: These issues have been passed on to the Greenhouse consultant. Comment: , Greenhouse — We want to go with Argus or Priva control system. Response: These issues have been passed on to the Greenhouse consultant. g: �byubnsnwocumentskcorrntransmittai letter - rulon nielson 07A 1,doc Page 9 CTA Architects Engineers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 208. 336. 4900 Fax. 208, 343. 3S31 http: / /www.ctagroup.com E -mail: baiscWo@ctagroup.com Jul,25. 2002 2:13PM REVIEW COMMENTS CZo PROJEC TITLE' Sen son Building Addition REVIEWED BY: yr_ 0. .1_a Sheet No, ale No- P 20b 6 2n I E -qoc Reviewer Corn 6Q- AJ tip , MA,� & t4 - R, Idfp� 4, �t V 4 J, jQ, F, , Gbvr...2 2ft" ru F 18 c G z 23 ! ►2a. --D�44A4 W t6M 9 CK No.5653 P. 10/25 1 �i Date: - 7/ 0 DO l Remark" VVI t- E6 & - 60MPu (9tkJMF--- � pev �eo - CoMI'v�Nn s l m e:- �- j'�1S S�ut�Uf1 (A., wer' +kZ R1.0_J - • I ..-. .. Jul•25. 2002 2:13PM REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Date: REI IEW BY. Sheet Nc.' = Reviewer Comments CK DO R emarks f Lge a _No. '1 721 3 7, 1 Z' 7 Ale-Is � F, M 7V - 1c) /3 3 '7 A "t - �zo 1 V / M-1 I goa m-1 N o , 5 6 5 3 P • 11/ (,.?IL, L e , ,J4 tv COMP -1 %I lion I I Ju1,25, 2002 2:13PM No.5653 P. 12/25 REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Date: July 2, 2002 REVIEWED BY_ Mechanical Shop , Sheet No. Rev iewer Comments CKI I DO Remarks Page No. 1 1 P101 Base Bid Pumps to be Bell & Gosset wt�i, GxQ P501 Note 12: Why elect WH? cm a - 7 � GsST PYkB IV rf"N YOV Page 15430 -4 �xG fr— 2.5A Prefer Leonard Valve SvG� P, Lo Thermostatic mixing water valve 9F3P^A&4,o , W K49 Page 15185 -2 4>,sWp 0" n 2.1 - AE 714 Prefer MEJaCO Condensate Receiver Station. dry.+ vas w � as Sheet A Stearn PR - 02, PR - 01; Prefer Spence M101 Sheet M101 Steam traps: Prefer Armstrong or Splrax Sarco 40 A , 5m Me>, A�p� � Jul 25. 2002 2:13PM REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT.TITLE, Benson Building Addition REVIEWED BY_ b- I t c m hf t1 rl No,5653 P. 13/25 Date: Sheet No_ Reviewer Comments Page No, �jo1Je � & G 4.7rrr�5 }FGn - PUcad 9 ��octh rSS - c - 1 5 41 5 9 Uri Naas - Or t�;�PLY% j �� - A r.Ja s A n G. rcri S} fr-0 Jj /, 7 Dl $5 r✓i c e S, CK DO Memarks W4/ W1Vl.. W19 V.YVL- lonnY� �t 51 pG�. �rti►,�- � W0 irJ1't� VfA- 0 t4AA0tVj7tl 5p" u �j Ea'�T U �l 1 5 NQ 0 Ju1,25, 20,02 2 No,5653 P- 14/25 ° 7 ' A R COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Data; July 3, 2002 REVIEWED BY; Neal Shirley --HVAC Sheet No. Reviewer Comments CK DO Remarks Page No. M t - feeder far chill water 501 Sho m k _dud Shea fee for heating ftmn"�t i'ico�l v®7 tr�r, g r makeup. Need water treatment 5 Lions injection it oc pumps and 60 gallon m xirig ; tanks. r .._ . � t-frof - to P Sys - n1a� ��........�_._�_....�.. � M 601 Pre -heat Re -heat together before fan_ Purpose ?7 Z S ' g� � ;� �,,�Q, r M 601 'Third party controls not acaeptaole" - Should ba acceptable as approved, Afto actuators are often used (example acceptable) 15628 -3 2.1 A Chiller manufacturers acceptable- DO NOT yy� Hitu , USE NlcQuay. co�►r�� 15975 - rl 1.1 A -2 Existing Johnson "Metasys" or existing Siebe "Ultivlst" or Tridium (Yamas Controls). Th e ta should, tie competitive bidding for the controls. 15975 -2 ✓ 2.1 A - 3 Not Automated Logic Controls by Clima Tech. AA- 16721-3 1.7 A- New system to indicate trouble upon trouble signal from existing: A-2 New system to go Into general alarm if existing system goes into general alarm. A -3 New system to perform indicated elevator operations A- 4 New system to release magnetic door holds "`Existing system to be replaced in the future, with Old zones transferred to now system -"" nee r nne• I A- e Ju1,25. 2002, 2;14PM. No.5653 P. 15/25 Ju. }_ _.._ _ -K. ...-, COLLEGE PHYSICAL AAN7 ' e m REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Da te: July 3, 2002 REVIEWED BY: Forrest Barnes Sheet No Page No. Reviewer Comments CK 00 Remarks P 402 E 2330 Pesticide Room needs an emergency LOC�� i Wash Station eyes & shower P 302 E 235 & E 235D Both green houses are sloped �b - fit.�31.4- lower than the rest of the building. Is there any Pt 0-- drinage field or file to keep water from ponding up? N Or will natural dralnege, take care of it? �`, , P 402 E 233C Pestcide door needs to be moved North and swing open opposite direction, Injector pump? needs moved West to corner. M 202 E 233C Pesticide room has no ventilation. Either VlpNn1'� vent so fresh air replaces the inside air which is Wvw Ile- toxic or lets move pesticide room out and put next to outside metal storage to the south off greenhouse because of toxic odors leave E 233C as extra storage. Ju1,25, 2002 2:14PM Ju1-05-2��2 11:28am From -RICKS COLLM PHYSICAL PLANT No.5653 P. 16/25 T -458 P.d11 F -M Date: CK 1 DO 1 Remarks wVr v lx' . ftvp tAafA1 N o-w� N vrxz , REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Beason Building Addition REVIEWED BY= Sheet No. Reviewer Comments Page No. _ Soy I t saw cVZ6 92,02- Q ic S CK �© "5 OL2 �l f J & CAS (c l�tC " (toZA isotNkl�a, Wkdl"C' c5 No.5653 P. 16/25 T -458 P.d11 F -M Date: CK 1 DO 1 Remarks wVr v lx' . ftvp tAafA1 N o-w� N vrxz , Ju1.25, 2002 2 :14PM No,5653 P- 17/25 REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Date: July 8, 2002 REVIEWED BY- Ben Romney She e t No_ I Reviewer Comments CK I DO I Remarks P402 P402 outdoor hose bib needed on the landcape storage shed rAffv W1 outdoor light on metal landscape storage-she E231 B is to have positive air pressure head house drainage (floor drain vs trench —are we reading correctly that there are 3 floor drains instead of trench? Will that work, or do we need trench ?) drain needed in headhouse cooler floor 1 reverse osmosis water needed in greenhouse cooling systems rev osm. Water in hose'bibs in greenhouse hose bibs on greenhouse south walls, east walls, west walls, inside and outside �H � I f I ,there should be RO hose bibs in cooling cooridor, 1 each end and 1 in middle , greenhouse 2 & 3 should have under -bench hot water heat ` ts*9� also, we would prefer to eliminate the ebb and flow bench, and have all rolling benches be the same (should be a savings there!) I i concerns about drainage from west end of greenhouses 4, 5, and hindenburg, and lab house I After much checking and research with industry, we would rather not have fan jet heating and air circulation, but desire to have HAP fans with heaters (like the hind house and lab house) or could be perimeter or end heaters with HAF circulation this may effect the cooling stages, as some type of louvered air intake may be needed during winter cooling, rather than bringing air through the corridor. We have seen systems in place that do this, and feel this will be a better system for our needs. I I I As already mentioned, we want to go with Argus or Priva control systems. I have asked Forrest Barnes to have these companies contact you directly via email etc. %*P 900,� wilt u P or NO �Nr� JuI.25, 2002 2 :14PM f No-5653 P - 18/25 REVIEW COMMENTS cov-ha ' PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Date: July 2, 2002 REVIEWED BY: Electrical Shop, Steve Price Sheet No. Page No, E101 E102 E301 Reviewer Comments 1 duits to outside lights on panel 1 GL Install new 480 - 208 Transformer fed from existing generator building Approx. 550 ft. 'trench with 2 inch conduit and and one inch conduit for controls to supply bath building. Remove existing generator. Manual 911 Pg.14240 - 4 Thyssen Krupp elevator base bid; all others as alternate E102 Belden Cable between CM4000 meter and panel IGL -Power Link Controller E102 Network drop at clock head end and at CM 4000 Q J rC4407 nea_j nnn•A ncti_i CK I DO l Remarks 6 R470,1lV 0 - - /�o% /yLC+D6 . / 6 G -fit IMVIA 1VIMU 71111M MIM -OW4 W0E:80 ZOOZ- EO -Ihr Jul,25. 2002 2:14PM REVIEW COMMENTS 1 0 PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Date. July 3 2002 REVIEWED BY. Neal Shirley --NVAC Sheet No Reviewer Comments cK Do Remarks Page Nv: M 501 M 601 M 601 15628.3 2.1 A 16975 - 1.1 A2 15975 -2 2.1 A - 3 Shot feeder for chill water makeup and Shot feeder for heating water makeup. Need water treatment stations with Injection pumps and 60 gallon mixing tanks. Pre - heat i Re - heat together before fan. Purpose?? "Third party controls not acceptable" Should be acceptable as approved, Blimo actuators are often used (example acceptable) Chiller manufacturers acceptable. DO NOT USE McQuay. Existing Johnson "Metasys" or existing Siebe "UNvlst" or Tridium (Mamas Controls). There should be competitive bidding for the controls. \lot Automated Logic Controls by Clirna - Tech. 16721 -3 1.7 A -1 New system to Indicate trouble upon trouble signal from existing. A -2 New system to go into general alarm if existing system goes into general alarm_ A - 3 New system to perform indicated elevator operations A-4 New system to release magnetic door holds "Existing system to be replaced in the future, with old Zones transferred to new system_ " OSB -� 800'd OSP - No-5653 P. 19/25 �D A LAMA 1W'11t1UJ mmllM dU1IV_Idn1_I 1w 4 .... . Ju1-25, 2002 2:14PM Ju, ,,..,,an, RICKS COLLM PHYSICAL PLANT PROJECT TITLE: REVIEWED 8Y: Sheet No. Reviewer Comments CK Page Na. SOO( U Gotu b f sl cai.A -iARM , Rot "p,(t d A4(3q� c. No'5653 P. 20/25 T - 9JO r.Jll r - cut Date. DO I Remarks b2aw'AA5 ` N t4,,k � ao. 71041 LAI l2x rZ f spercc, re n , M REVIEW COMMENTS C3 ----- �,__,�_..._ _....... A1,25. 2002 2:14PM No-5653 P. 21/25 REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Benson Building Addition Date: July 2, 2002 REVIE BY: Wayne Clark Sheet No. Reviewer Comments I CK I DO Remarks Paae No. 5000 The HV AC and Electrical section should have a & reference to the s®Gtion # 07841 for Firestopping. 6000 if not included, Contractor will over look- Coordinate with notes on Sheet F101. Sheet Fire hydrant lines may cause a point of C201 contamination. Should the 8" line be looped around the building? Sheet INote # 2 C302,5 All water mains supply lines shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe. Sheet 0302 -5 Ail Connections to existing water mains shall be done with a "Het Tap This is required by the City of Rexburg. A307 Exterior wall for skylight shows 518 Gyp Board with Detail 3 EPDM as exterior finish. Please review this and spec, a the backer -board or an exterior product. A502 IProvide detail & spec for picture rail In halls. A701 Toilet Accessories TAI 07 & TA108 should be contractor furnished and installed. instructions During our earlier Design Meeting. we recommeded To use of a Bid Matrix sheet for Electrical & Mechanical Bidders This was sent to Scott Mackey. This needs to be included so we can have based bid pricing and — -- - alternate suppliers, -- 16511-2 All T -8 lamps will be owner furnished._ A Q(L[tlW t�OL. J ,2.1 cl^..pr es , 16621 nrO —A r -.s W(L w—.So, Generator is specified at 30 KW, is this large enough l to provide E -power for Greenhouse needs and support the new and existing building? ��►Jrnt4 S Inn •j ne+,_1 ft:p- P P (T7 < 0 T GIN t&AX • /' �1 D� ,f - 1v� � J t,,,r G�+l , - 4 w a/-t%5- 70Qn�nt�oon3� Jul-25, 2002 2:15PM A SCHI)WATIC DRAWINGS REVIEW PROJECT TITLE: Benson Addition DATE! 7/2102 REVIEWED BY: Gaylen Jensen a 4 A danj St evens room numbers on dtawiaRs correct 13100 L100 $103 ,13103 E103 E302 13302 Ned a data locator symbol for ceiling wireless access point. WobdeTing v✓hy face plates are stain'iess slee , _ -'— Detail I & 2 show typical data with 2 outlets, mumiis tutee. What type of surface raceway for desks are being put in to house data and power? Or is it in conduit'? Dctail 3 cable tray support drawing doeso,'t look correct for the type of tray being installed. -ingte teipnone sympot m DOX mounting J7elghts may be wxoag, All data locations should have 3 jacks. Courtesy phone should be up at handicap accessible height, 48 ". Need emergency power two 20 amp circuits, installed in rack of tclecommunication Toorn (Tl). TR doesn't need double duplex outlets. Sizlglc duplex is tine. No,5653 P. 22/25 wao BY (3Y error THtr ,�- pr+7,�rt' �c�' ors wcX1� fWu 5v-% 7O%zOJ patdv 4- -& CWrra. IT bl%AW t P4UV, cambUtrw WS • T S1FeT?OW.ft*i'q._ s%ecn -$ 1 OM ? NO I OlvWjr*iy carul AAr 69F tAAL-L KAlrD . O?Tf+t t. yARZo 1 �t dam• Iv"s was o'f?Ol tills L - baa .,01 tile, 17 .ov a F J Wb , . B401 -402 Data floor box for tec cabinets okay, but cables need to continue on up into cabinet for tarrrdz tion. Tec cabinet has a built in l �t box for termination. E401 Mechanical roopi needs data locator of jacks instead of single. 'bRAAl71lLQ�rS +Akc4Dtt= t60. E401 _ Sheet work note 16 , "Gee specifications "_ Where are spers7 s �t�lc•�1.r�v �^ w 4, p B4402 Sheet work ootc 7, "scc specifications ". Avoic are the specs? TO g*'t4 c>j c=nI ^&o-J4 CN t1 o 41 ,E40 -402 Concerned about all the blank data locations; would prefer that q 'ZOf& . _ fkAJ)AO7 VOtW- Ne7T they are tabled now, especially 219B. r l.G"2&_ 4rL.7 SU p 09-Ir ^ J ;1_OW F.401 402 Didn't notice any courtesy phone locations. Should there E401 -402 'Vending and copy rr►acbine locations peed data drops if applicabl _ �?' tl" plfX2 tMAO X p ,tics 13401 _--� _ l his cabl nota General 1, division 17 contractor wiltil e tray- All ! �.� raceway For div. 17 will be done by division 17 contractor. E401 There should be a detail showing cable tray and the location of be T - -z,* 1 c e iv t>w, Conduits,joiniiug the tray, specifying height & spacing from tray, B402 Note 14 shows break in path of conduit for Ore copper riser. Wli , u L T t Gor ntuo _ �.,�_� _ - A _ � tc�esg5 Cm_ntl au.±•l' - E.4 02 Need detail of telecom= room. �MTw 22— f , 13401 -402 Need wireless data drop of jacks over select classrooms, PO4-pA^"( - T Ai5 p,Act �.l 1PtafZ. Also need electrical outlet fOT wireless access point. t,,y.Q C.e,MMtkr6tcernW 3 2 nA1_( tdo ' ED^ s cqa c)P �Ytk- PtZtaz,Ta 00 pinu,S€, 0 JuI-25- 2002 2;15PM SC F EMATIC DRAWING REVIEW PROXECT TITLE: $�g;a,&ddition DATE; _JO REVILWIM BY: ' 42� z q*t) 1��.4rrlc� zn= N O. Page No. ,� N,EF �,,ySe � 7-4c C14le"ZT C«rrLeanr r �/`r S �. j ,, /t,Za.� v rr��d �c�wc,✓s 30 X1/0 ")",c /d' - iyrd a v; ��r 13d U f .. G ,51l - 14-' 70 ao c'?o - S c�J 13c r 7d ,ZEQ w �.tjcD To No.5653 P. 23/25 V-E Pea Tu S F�CT 1 114r Aaa . Elm r , j.- "c, -r-W -CPw-1 Flcs�c; `[ W S wcsrL De \tdtEo TV P YLI At ME wl b R -Aw«/4s sn4 cs) 1 f.4 Itj �O�T C /'43tT11%c'Y 16'Lr w I T�+,n1► S' s Ps cts \d(L't- Tloi.o' - FP - Ap - , 0"W ,UG 71-las is`n�or -56991F CS W C , al.a 1 &Arl • , e�fi... � I mIA lwl?C i.u., tinil)m tyn i m -WO14 Wd cn 7nn7 -cn nr �JuI.25- 2002 2 :15PM PROJECT TITLE: Benson !REVIEWED BY: Z /,/I Sheet Nv, Page No T 20b P IA-M No f es 4# 7 All 4 La— Ne A/Oak S�44�1� 4 mucrL 4ftA6 N AA-2. 1 bt i u�.S (, oo t E -q C Z0 REVIEW COMMENTS ig Addition No.5653 'P. 24/25 Date: 712- 4 Z Reviewer Comments 1200" corrc� qfe4w�,. V41 Rz l.AaOr s4k fXcs t Qre. �.ta�A 2' DIN6M -. CK f DO lRemarks ` ,ftDC 4Q Qd Tt-> A-(. a%-'r a zl D 4 tr,S tA, )A'L�-e lscvard'v 4 P'IR LL, Ju1 2 . 2002 2:15PM No•5653 P. 25/25 REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT TITLE: Benson wilding Addition Date: REVIEWED BY: � LAI 'I f_r'l4 -n�S Sheet No. Page No. 167213 r Comments fG/ X "'A/so't Fei- / 3 C� PkN- loves 7 �4 ©c"i f *20 13116 i AVsa f lU� p aG � 1 4W— loo — 7 CK I DO 1Remarkg Spar PPA&S" 1 !a` -Z 1 *-P. 1 . ...•.. 1 �1.� i 111 1 �w��nwn ��1w 1 �1 u1w 1 1 111.111M 1 •A ft- AA 11111 I «- T ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PROJECT: DRAWING ISSUED: Benson Building Addition CLARIFICATION NO.: 1 BYU - Idaho Rexburg, ID 83460 IN REFERENCE TO RFI NO.: N/A DATE: 9 -24 -0T July 18, 2002 PROJECT REF.: BYUBNSN DRAWING LIST: TO: Jacobsen Construction Company C201 - Grading / Drainage Plan Attn: Scott C. Stringfellow 3131 West 2210 South Salt Lake City, UT 84119 FROM: Brian Hauff, AIA Please submit an itemized quotation for changes in the Contract and /or Time incidental to proposed modifications to the Contract Documents de scribed herein. ❑ You are directed to proceed with this work, please submit your lump sum proposal by ❑ Please submit a proposal request for this work prior to commencing. Please submit proposal by ® Please proceed with this work as a Field Work Order. Submit daily work orders to the Owner's Representative. Please see attached drawing showing the revised grades corrected from sheet C201. Please apply these modifications during final grading. If you have general questions, please contact Brian Hauff at CTA Architects Engineers at 1- 208 - 336 -4900, extension 2804. if you have specific civil questions, please contact Ryan Adelman, P.E. at Keller Associates at 1- 208 - 2881992. g: \byubnsn\documents\ca \clarification 1_9- 25- 02.doc Page 1 CTA Architects Engiueers 1185 Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 208. 336. 4900 Fax: 208. 343. 3531 http: / /www.ctasvcs.com E -mail: boiseinfo@ctagroup.com �Z 005TING ADA 5TALL5 - - NEW ADA 5TAU5 (.jl (1J 5VC 5VC 5VC F . a I 7 rn0 �z G> z 0 zD �O 0 G� m _