The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBP, CO & DOCS - 03-00085 - American Family Insurance - Tenant FinishINSPECTION RECORD CITY OF .. BUILDING ISSUED M: NAME: ert C� ern r _.v PERMIT # — L3- I ? - b FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF: n m erc a JOB ADDRESS: 985 Al .2,n-A E #- e D6 GENERA. CONTRACTOR: yD i- /ZD w Rt Am i ( Cd in � - /�►^ This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained In Building Code and Zoning Regulations of the City of Rexburg. It is specifically understood that this Permit does not allow any Variance to the regulations of the City of Rexburg Building or Zoning Codes unless specifically approved by the City Council and explained on the Building Permit Application as approved by the Building Inspector. Date Approved Issue E Inspector THIS PERMIT MUST BE PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED AT THE BUILDING SITE THE BUILDING MAY NOT BE OCCUPIED OR USEDW FIRST O BTAINING A CERTIFICA OF OCCUPANCY. No work shall be done on any part of 1) Acomplete set of approved drawings along with permit must be kept on the the building beyond the point premises during construction. Indicated In each successive N,OTICEIN 2) The permit will become null and void in the event of any deviation from the Inspection without approval.. No accepted drawings. structural framework of any part of the 3) No foundation, structural, electrical, nor plumbing work shall be concealed building or any underground work without approval. shall be covered or concealed without approval. 1 st Layout ..................... 2nd Footing ................... 3rd Foundation .............. 4th Truss ....................... 5th Framing ................... 6th Drywall .................... 7th Sidewalk ................I 8th Final ........................ 9th Occupancy .............. ELECTRICAL list Groundwork ............ 2nd Rough -in ................ 3rd Final ....................... PLUMBING 1 st Trench ..................... 2nd Service Connection 3rd Rough -in ................. 4th Heat Cable .............. 5th Final ........................ For Inspections Call 3594020 24 Hour Notice A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CAN NOT BE ISSUED PI TO FINAL ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING INSPECTIONS. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Rexburg Department of Building Inspection Building Permit No: R- 03 - 12 -0 4 Applicable edition of code: 9 International Building Code 2000 ❑ International Residential Code 2000 ❑ Uniform Building Code 1 997 Site address: 485 North 2nd East Suite #1o6 Use and occupancy: Commercial Type of construction: - rely -tj dim pg - Design occupant load: Sprinkler System required: )1 Yes ❑ No Name and address of owner: American Family Insurance 6000 American Parkway Madison, W 53783 Contractor: Horizon Retail Construction Special conditions: Occupancy: A Full ❑ Partial ❑ Temporary This Certificate, issued pursuant to the requirements of Section iog o the International B uilbing Code, certifies that, at the time of issuance, this building or at p of the building that was inspected on the bate listeb was f Duna to be in compliance with the requirements of the cote for the group anb bivision Of occupancN anb the use for which the proposeb occupancN was classi f ieb. Date: January 5, 2004 (5:40 C.O. Issued by: _7;7,� Building Official There shall be no future change in the existing occupancy classification of the building nor shall any structural chyes, odifications or additions be made to the building or any portion thereof until the Buil T has revi ed and approved said future ch Water De artm p en Department State of Idaho Electrical Department - (208- 356-4830 ) 0 Merlin Webster 5 20H r.^ a APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF REXBURG, IDAHO Date ofApplication 67 `6) 3 No, 9112 P - 5 Permit No._ OWNER - rice — Site Address____ $ IV. 2plb FAST of Mailing Address 0000 /4/M�.LrGEI►f . �.O,a,� Y �. City /9�itc1Lip ./rIAO/Sed.l✓� .f.�'1,�,3� _ ^ .., V ,, . Telephone /Fax/Mobile [iOg ZAi �• Z//[ CONTRA Name - wma_o_�L Mniaaling Addras t. :iry /Statelzip RACILLlr l _.'�"' __� ,_ _____._ Teiepl7oce/Fa�ilvlobile [ Z �iZ� �r . t l� • (r �'QD _•�, - -- — _ - - -- - -- PROTECT INFORMATION DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Property Zane- . Is existing use compatible rwi&,, zoning, (weening parking, etc) When was this building last occupied cute Engineer Firm 9jy/ PIvr CE Subdivision Lot Blot:k _ Carci One Residential Cg Educational Government Remodet Other Circle One New House Addition /Remodel to House 'Nov Commercial o ercial Remade Circle One Basemen lVon Finished / Unfmished Other None/ Patio/ Carport/ Awning /A T-ot Square Footage._ N/A Lot Width & Square Feet ff-S Garage Square Meet H► /A Number of Stories �_ Height of Building_ What will structure be used for- Home Herne Bucine-s Apartment _ rcial Onset T _. Will there be au apwtm nt ? If so, how many units 14 M Total Estimated Cost Are you in a flood plain ND Signature of Applicant_ * k�k+ kk�k�kks�kkkkk�Ak *F *k� *k *kkk�NkWkkk�lk* Code Zone -- - Build4, * kkkk�k+ Fk�d+$ ��tk* k�Xk* kWkkk+ �k+ kkkk�kk* kklrN+ k�kksk�kMk *k *�F%S% * * #S��F +��F _ Building Permit Fees (CJ' Plan Check. Fees -� (Parks, Fire, and Police) Plumbing Permit Fees rigging Pernult tees Water & Sewer Fees Front Footage Fee Impact Feels TOTAL Signature of Inspector Issued by " . BUILDING PERMIT APPLICAT ON REXBURG, ID DATE AL 7 -0 NO THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER �!`dCtsl -� iZtYi�4lV J.�14'sit , , , AWRESS P tMtd 60 a BUILDER ARCHITECT DESIGNER STRUCTURE: ❑ NEW ❑ REMODEL ❑ ADDITION ❑ REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL ❑ FIRE DAMAGE ❑ RESIDENCE ❑ COMM. ❑ EDUCATIONAL ❑ GOVT ❑ RELIGIOUS ❑ FENCE ❑ PATIO ❑ CARPORT ❑ GARAGE ❑ AWNING FOOTINGS FOUNDATION BASEMENT FLOORS EXT. WALLS INT. WALLS CEILING ROOF HEAT 'INSULATED 19 CONCRETE NCRETE ❑ PARTIAL ❑ WOOD ❑ WOOD . WOOD ❑ WOOD " ❑DRYWALL 1 El BUILT UP. ❑ GAS LLS ❑WOOD SH. ❑OIL ILING t MASONRY MASONRY ❑ FULL CRETE ❑ MASONRY AASONRY (3 OTHER ❑ OTHER kNO D OTHER ❑ CONCRETE (3 CONCRETE (3 PLASTER ❑ COMP SH. Cl COAL ❑ VENEER ❑ DRYWALL ❑ TILE ❑ TILE ❑ FIREPLACE ❑ PERIMETER ❑ METAL ❑ PLASTER WCOUSTIC ❑ ROLL ROOF. ❑ ELECTRIC ❑ STUCCO ❑ TILE ❑ OPEN ❑ METAL This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained ip the Uniform Building Code and Zoning Regulations of Rexburg, and it is hereby agreed that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specifications will be completed in accordance with the regulations pertaining and applicable thereto: The issuance of the permit does not waive restrictive co venants. REMARKS: DEP ARTMENT OF BUILDING & ZONING VALUE CASH FEE PAID * PAID CASH $ -- PICANT BUILDING ADD RESS WHITE - Owner's Copy CANARY- BuildiAg Departments Copy PINK- Assessors Nov ,26. 2033 4:29AM No,911E P. 3 t.. rte: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATOA REXEIuAG, ID DATE- No. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYIN13 PLANS AND SPECIFICATION& fl1IYNEA N r rcy c _ J MADDRESS 41rS N. Z^0 few 0/0% PM*JE (tLt ) 4-TF STRUCtUNE: O NEW X REMODEL Q ADDITION U REPAIR Q RENEWAL Q FIRE DAMA431 Q RE &IC}ENOE )(00 M IA Q EDUOATlOtvAL Q GOVT O RELIGtC7U6 Q FENCE U PATIO 0 CARPORT Q GARAGE O AWNING FOOTINGS FCUNDATI(M BASEMENT FLOORS EXT, WAILS MT: WALLS rZILING ROOT' HEAT INSULATED � CMCAETE U MASONRY ® CONCRETE 0 MASONRY LI PARTIAL Q FULL WOOD i0owRiSTfi ❑ vi= if WOOD O WOOD ❑ BIHLT UP ® GAS ( WALLS Q OTHER Q OTHER IPI NO U OTHER Q MASONRY U OONCAErE 13 VGNew U MASONRY J CONCRETE Q DRYWALL 0 DRYWALL U PLASTER TIA UwOODSH. Q COrrrR ii. (NILE i a OIL COAL 0 FIREPLACE CEELJNQ R MRS U PERILfETER Exr. p a t" �. a a c m ctr r t E t; This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained In ft Unrorm Building Cade and Zoning RagUlatOns Of ROXburg, and if is hereby agreed that the work to be dons as shown in the plans and specitimfions wil be completed in accordance With #te regulations pertaoting and applicable the44o. The issuance of the peA does ml w aive reericgve covamts. REMARKS: WO ORDER PHONE . EFFECTIVE DATE DATE SERVICE: ADDRESS ACC# RT# NAME MAILING ADDRESS OWNER ADDRESS EMPLOYER OR RELATIVE COMMENTS PHONE NO. OF PEOPLE WORK PHON E 85.# IN J READ I] ON ❑ RE -READ !-I OUT ❑ CHECK LEAK ❑ OFF n WI ONLY VACANT ❑ GR CONT. # MFTFR SIZE GR AT# LOCATION COMPLETED BY SIGNATURE 11 RENTING DEPOSIT AMOUNT 7 BUYING DATE PAID ITV _ — - ❑ SELLING REFUND DATE= ❑ OWNER AMT REFUNDED LJ BL CONT # AMT APP BILL m r W T F S _ SIN SIZE NO OF BINS ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 7 Q ISSUED BY L] COMPUTER FILE wn-ycopy PiW- 0t3CQw GnLMN DD-repe= CA August 2, 2003 rl L. TO: Kurt Hibbert City of Rexburg Zoning Department FROM: Clyde Luke (duly elected spokesman (as usual) to speak for the homeowners SUBJECT: Fencing on East side of the Randy Bird Married Student Housing Units We have now had a meeting (August 1, 2003) of all the home owners who live in the 300 block of Harvard Ave. One hundred percent of the residents in this block were in attendance. Nine of the ten home owners voted that the city should follow through and require a fence in order to prevent any access to or from Harvard Avenue. By the same margin of votes, it was concluded that there should be no gate allowed as that would defeat the purpose of the fence in the first place. The undersigned signatures represent eight of the nine homeowners in attendance at the block meeting who voted that the city require the fence and that it be a fence with no gate. The person who did not sign this petition had already made a commitment to no fence at the time Mr Bird visited him early this week Although at the meeting of homeowners he somewhat agreed with the rest of us, he felt he could not go back on his commitment previously made to Mr. Bird. It was also unanimous amongst the below signed homeowners that this fence must be built before the city signs off on the project and approves the complex. Obviously, if the city signs off before this is done, there will never be a fence no matter how long a trial period was given with no fence. It is our understanding that the only time the city can require this is before they approve the complex as being complete and ready for occupancy. As homeowners we talked about various locations for the fence. First is to build it next to the sidewalk which is illegal as the city has an easement on the property back at least 15 feet from the curb. The second option is to build the fence down the middle of the green belt landscaped strip. There could easily be a major problem with this if Mr. Bird were to decide not to maintain the city easement portion between the fence and the sidewalk, although we don't think Mr. Bird would want a weed patch in front of his otherwise very attractive apartments. If that route were chosen and Mr. Bird did not maintain the portion outside his fence, it is our understanding that under city ordinance, the city would be responsible to come in and mow the weeds every three weeks or so and send Mr. Bird the bill. Obviously a lawn care service or any other means of landscape care, of course, would have to access that portion from Harvard Ave which we are in agreement to. It was concluded by the homeowners that the best and most practical solution, if Mr. Bird does not want to place the fence at the city easement line, then the fence should be placed beginning at the edge of the existing south fence and proceed past the edge of the parking lot to the very corner of each building thus leaving the lovely brick at the end of the building showing to break up the solid line of a fence. This must then go all the way north to the north east corner of the parking lot and then west to join the school/federal property fence approximately 100 plus feet to the west. Mr. Bird has stated to one of the homeowners that the space of land east of where the school/federal land fence jogs to the north and then east again is not his property (thus he would have to build his own fence to the west on his own property line). None of us agree to putting in a gate as Mur. Bird has proposed because that would entirely defeat the purpose of the fence and make the entire fence useless. Also, in the conditional permit, it is our understanding that there was no provision for a gate with the exception of the heavy duty fire truck gate accessible only by a fire truck breaking through it. However, it appears they have solved the fire entrance problem another way. This third option was the unanimous choice for the location of the fence by the home owners signed below. As an alternative (but by no way favored) fence location, we homeowners would agree to a fence dividing the green belt if some condition is in place that commits Mr. Bird and all future owners of that property complete with signatures of all present property owners that they will agree to landscape and maintain the area outside the fence. This would have to include a clause in the records that all future owners of that property continue to maintain the area outside the fence. If there is no legal way to ensure that, then we would not be in favor of that alternative location. If that location were chosen, again it would have to join with a fence built out from the east side of the south fence and would have to extend all the way across with no breaks to the northeast comer of the property and then west to join the existing chain link fence already on the property line. As to Mr. Birds possible concerns that preventing access will keep his tenants from lounging or picnicking on that green area, he really should have considered this just as Kensington Apartments on 2" Bast and third South did, and moved their units finther back on the lot so they could have a nice green area between their apartments and the fence. Kensington has also beautifully landscaped the area between the fence and the street and have maintained it very well. But Mr. Bird didn't make that choice even though he knew he had to build a fence preventing access to and from the east side of his property (letter to city on file from Mr. Bird agreeing to this). If tenants want to picnic there they can drive around and have their picnic. We would assume that most couples would prefer to go to one of the city's lovely parks or green areas that are not so close to a busy street. Also as a side note, we would think that the couples would not want a gate that their toddlers and young children could go through and have access that close to a busy street. That is every parent's nightmare. The ab a ements reL s feelin of the folio homeownn our street: AF 3 7 �` &A O A Following is some of the background on the history of the above stated issue and the requests made above, simply for the information of any of you who may not remember or have taken your jobs since the original hearing was held: it is common - n o',Me the amongst the n c;.vj ��giner that +;; -r c�nn4wnw +inn+ n .�.. J LY" "vva.� L �uao u�.v�avu va rtre tl in addi %u to the 200 block of Harvard are amongst the narrowest if not the narrowest streets in the City. Because of this and because of the fact that the street becomes even narrower after the snow falls (it actually becomes impassable in spots after snow is built up), we are very much concerned about the amount of traffic that has increased tremendously. Within the last two years more and more people are using this street as a way to get around the bottleneck created on 2' East between 3rd South and 5 South. ( Numerous times I have parked at the south end of Harvard and counted the cars that have turned off of 2n East then driven the half block east to Harvard and then driven north two blocks to 3r South and then West which puts them back onto 2' East). The approximate proportion is 3 out of every 4 cars using this route in this fashion. This bottleneck is being created by the increased on and off traffic of the new Kensington Apt and the entrances into the BYU -I's girls dorms and Viking drive which is now the main entrance to the southern end of BYU- I's parking lots. Anticipating more traffic problems in the future, most of the residents on 300 block of Harvard attended the hearing some 5 or 6 years ago when Randy Bird first presented his request for a permit to build student housing on his property. At that time these residents via their spokesman insisted that a condition be placed in the permit that would prevent any access from or to the apartments via vehicles or any other access either onto or off of Harvard Avenue with the exception of a heavy duty fire gate that could only be broken down by fire trucks. Mr. Bird's suggestion at that time was that he build a 6 foot high berm using huge lava rocks or other materials to block access. This condition was approved and written into the permit. It is also our understanding that later Mr. Bird confirmed in a letter to the city and agreed to build a 6 foot fence to meet the above stated conditions of the permit. It is common logic to assume that if any access is allowed, not only would visitors access the apartments that way because it would be quicker than finding a parking place in the parking lot plus there would be many students who would use this same access because, again, it is quicker and more convenient to park on Harvard and run in to their units to pick up something they forgot or to just crash for a few hours before the next class. With the exception of the no overnight parking ordinance for a few months in the winter, many would logically park on Harvard day and night to avoid the congestion of the parking lot and the bottleneck described above on 2' East. This can only happen, however, if they have access (even a gate access) to the units from Harvard. This fence would have to join to the south fence and run entirely across the east side of the property to the northeast corner of the Bird property and then west along the edge of said property to meet the present fence which separates said property from the School/Federal property which is approximately 150 feet west of the east side of the Bird property. We, the major majority of homeowners on 300 block of Harvard must insist that such a fence be built without a gate and have suggested two suggestions as to where this fence may be placed, trying to take into account Mr. Birds concerns and also the overall look of the apartments blending into the neighborhood which Mr. Bird has stated to each of us via door to door contact that he wants to do. However, he made it quite clear on those visits that he preferred no fence at all which the undersigned refuse to accept in light of the conditions of the conditional permit. All of the items included in the above "history" section were also discussed with the homeowners and they also concur with what has been written. S by J .' l� _�� ': -� G ;� 1 -al. ,v Feu ��'ivk�,jiii ivr the ° abv J ° v r 4 YS LAI ti ti 6T � To 7el REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS SOIL TYPE BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD MAX DRY DENSITY PROJECT Cougar courts Client De Patco Contractor De Patco Weather Sunny nice LOCATION KEY BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall ST Street WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot Aw�_� FORSGREN ASSOCIA TES / INC. Date 9/29/03 Project 01 -03 -0922 0011 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE TEST TEST LOCATION ELEV. % DENSITY ISOIL % COMP NO. DEPTH MOIST WET I DRY TYPE SPEC FIELD Cougar E & W PL side walk PR 9/29 2 4" 70'W off Maria center line, 30' N off SE corner W cougar BLD. FSG 5.3 129.7 123.1 PR 95.0 96.2 REMARKS: Established a rolling pattern with DePatco's rollers as 6 passes. Any compaction over 94.5% is acceptable. SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY DePatco Technition Dustin Passey Kevlewed Icy 1 Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering Consultan t 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane,- Park City, Utah 84098, (435) 655 -9557 Fax - (435) -647 -5714 Email -petej @catapulsion.net STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: AMERICAN FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CENTER REXBURG, IDAHO CLIENT: LYNN F. MORGAN AIA DATE STARTED: JUNE 2003 DATE SUBMITTED: JULY 14, 2003 DESIGN CRITERIA WIND: SEISMIC SOILS: BASIC WIND SPEED: 90 MPH EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION_ C SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY: D SEISMIC USE GROUP: II SITE CLASS: D R COEFFICIENT: 5 IMPORTANCE FACTOR: 1.25 DESIGN ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE VARIES, SEE SOILS REPORT GOVERNING CODES: - 2000 IBC DESIGN LOADS ROOF: DL = 20 PSF FLOORS: DL = 50 PSF LL = 35 PSF TL = 55 PSF LL = 100 PSF TL = 150 PSF Jarratt Engineering Inc. JOB TITLE BY PW DATE -710s Structural Engineering Consultant A F f-:E SHEET OF 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane; Park City, Utah 84098, (435) 655-9557 Fax-(435)-647-5714 SUBJECT: - rL 0 0 1 01 PlLir Lo4vitjG WoTt. -1 2 r to - rzQo F CH / 7 1 5 26K 6- 0 6 rT- 4 :5-7 4 0 o j-\ 3 - 43 50?5 31 24K 4-y r �-T z * I I - s �q I C,6y� 167 =6K Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane,- Park City, Utah 84098, (435) 655-9557 Fax-(435)-647-5714 SUBJECT: JOB TITLE BY FM DATE -710S SHEET OF 19 ------ - - - - -- s PA- w lQQ0 3z - 1 1 100 Z9 C It 76 5 60 --1 VA - ttoo - co wm NS PAC WC 146K fs 7V7A-5; S-1 ZQ -�_S le6K 5- 6 N16 -, l 6 93 K - Z5 6ZK Ts 6 T5 5->fS-V;r D tr- T's 6 -) � -\- i -z 2- 4Q FA/n 2 7 0 1 +0 r RAM BasePlate V1.2 Jarratt Engineering, Inc. 9w(❑IO,O OH American Entertainment Rexberg Detailed Design Results TS7x7 Plate 6/27/03 12:39 INPUT DATA: Column Column Size ............................. TS7X7X.3750 Dim: BfTop TfTop BfBot TfBot TW Depth (in) 7.00 0.375 7.00 0.375 0.375 7.00 Base Plate Plate Fy (ksi) ....................... 36.000 N (Parallel to Web) (in) ................ 13.000 B (Perpendicular to Web) (in) ........... 13.000 Plate Thickness (in) .................... 0.750 Anchor No anchors present 1.00 Footing 9.656 Footing Strength f'c (ksi) ........... 3.00 Concrete Modulus (ksi) .............. 3122.02 Dimension (Parallel to web) (ft) ........ 7.00 Dimension (Perpendicular to web) (ft) ... 7.00 RESULTS: Analysis Uniform Load on Base Plate. Plate Bending Max bending moment from concrete compression Allowable Stress Increase Factor ........ ......... 1.00 N Eff ( in) ............ ............................... 9.656 B Eff ( in) ............ ............................... 9.656 m [N- 0.95d]/2.0 ( in) .. ............................... 1.503 n [B- 0.95b]/2.0 ( in) .. ............................... 1.503 Controlling effective width to resist moment (in) ... 9.656 Controlling plate bending moment (kip -ft) ........... 1.53 fb(ksi) .......... ............................... 20.29 Fb(ksi) .......... ............................... 27.00 fb /Fb ................ ............................... 0.75 Thickness Required ( in ) .............................. 0.650 Thickness controlled by cantilever action. Anchors No anchors present Bearing Eff Area of Support A2 (in ^2) ........................ 372.99 Plate Area Al ( in^ 2) .. ............................... 93.25 Sqrt( A2/ A1) ........... ............................... 2.00 Allowable Bearing Pressure (ksi) ................. 2.10 Actual Bearing Stress (ksi) ....................... 1.68 Structural Engineering Consultant 3 Jarratt Engineering, Inc JOB TITLE Af�f r/r. k BY r, DATE n JOB NO. Y N 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane M Park City, Utah 84098 SUBJECT CHECKED SHEET x OF (435) 655 -9557 ." v 51--' � V�AM ) W7 BM. LOADING SKETCH V M SIZE DEFL MARK (K) (FT -K) rzoaF Jo S LST 3� l�S� eZ 3fi C vv- I I!. so -7 -9 Sclp 990 6�A-1 8 G/ Pprr eZ � - I 45 -r20 I �ll�i= IlP +- 13opSF 6 I T S 21 h - 7 KVp w1 41-9 �- � � Zi„S z►_S c� So W r�on� JE i RS ''�r' PC) �3ZS Steel Design Report Element: Untittedl 0 Company: Description: 1 5 �w 13 User: Date: 06127/2003 02:33 PM Software: Eagle Point Steel Beam Design GENERAL INFORMATION Description Value DesE ......... ....... .......... . . .... best Design Code AISC ASD (1990) Total S an I .. ............. .............. .. 1,00. First Node Support Pinned Last Node S Y Total Load Deflection LJ240.00 ................ . .......... ... .... . e ad Oil: :Lfvj.�o Defteai .......... — ..... . ....................................... ... Maximum Stress Ratio 1.000 Linear 0, Steel Yield Stress 36 K/ln^2 . . . . . ....... ..... Sector ............. .... ... ..... ...... pe .............. .... ...... .......... .. ....... . ........... ........ - ....... .... .. I ............ ....................... Maximum Section Depth 36.00 In M. xMinimu 'Sectiowl)epth: ...... .... ........ ..... . ............ . . ......... ...... ....... ..... . ... .... ..... ... . .......................... Number of Solutions 10 ................ ........... ............ ............. ......... . .. ..... . ............. .................. ....... ............ ........ ... ........ . ................... Yes SPAN LENGTH DATA (Unit: Ft) ............... S an j 51.00 ..... ................ LOADS ReE No. Load Case Load Type Dir Begin Value Begin Position End Value End Position 1 Dead ea r..*: Y 60 F 2 Live Linear Y -0.715 (K/Ft) 0.00 (Ft) -0.715 (K/Ft) 5 1.000 (Ft) D ead oncew ....... ... 4 Dead Concen Y -10.500 (K) 47.00 (Ft) - -2 1.000 (K), ------------------ ........ .... .. ..... .... . LOAD COMBINATIONS LCl: DI-Only LC2: DL + LL on All Spans CRITICAL STRESS SUMMARY Jarratt Engineering, Inc JOB TITLE , � G / / BY � DATE �7�p2 JOB NO. �y Structural Engineering Consultant 3 �,,/} /7 F l/ �` SIZE 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane Park City, Utah 84098 SUBJECT CHECKED SHEET n ,/ OF F (435) 655 -9557 i b BM. LOADING SKETCH V M SIZE DEFL MARK (K) (FT -K) t33 - c�Z� -ZCZ� 2� ZZ, t G -7K W4tL -7h (40 T Z6V\ S 2- ► scr� W- 9 srV0s `7 - Z -ti Z C /1 A Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Mf2 2✓i� LC��?'l%ngM�r✓� 2 M 2 2� n n. 3 _ 4 vv -� s i 11 Pvr 1M` `1T1�f r }, 8 9 - 10 _. 12 V� fir- `/ 4 L� s ��0 .W 14 15 16 VF / / C'+ 2, 1 `I /\ V 22 561��_ 23 24 25 26 27 Pz S 5 � 28 29 K 1 01 ttt VV I 31 V5-7 32 C �JJ t I J,.� /" L Jarratt Engineering, Inc Structural Engineering Consultant JOB TITLE OB NO. By DATE 1 05 J 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane n^ ' V 1 [ "vii G CHECKED SHEET M (( OF Park City, Utah 84098 (435) 655 - 9557 SUBJECT: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Mf2 2✓i� LC��?'l%ngM�r✓� 2 M 2 2� n n. 3 _ 4 vv -� s i 11 Pvr 1M` `1T1�f r }, 8 9 - 10 _. 12 V� fir- `/ 4 L� s ��0 .W 14 15 16 VF / / C'+ 2, 1 `I /\ V 22 561��_ 23 24 25 26 27 Pz S 5 � 28 29 K 1 01 ttt VV I 31 V5-7 32 C �JJ t I J,.� /" L Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineerinp, Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane,- Park JOB TITLE BY DATE NJ - ljq� SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655-9557 Fax-(435)-647-5714 SUBJECT: m RA- C rzz I Tzs Isla Spar Vv= I lio pyr 115 10 t i c- 4t()' rj � ) ! 9 ' '3 vv� 1 5 P YF u s f, t vf - c' ,o` rj� �73 ------ -- --- � � i1 S nom= ! �� 1/1/ �" - � s _s� Cl � _- �ZS All': I co tivrvl N3 P h Sly -- - 5 - 3 'rs V1�1 -F� V132 14 1' 1 Z is 3 A C rzz I Tzs Isla Spar Vv= I lio pyr 115 10 t i c- 4t()' rj � ) ! 9 ' '3 vv� 1 5 P YF u s f, t vf - c' ,o` rj� �73 I i Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineerinp, Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane,- Park JOB TITLE C rL r)r5 k 6 BY DATE V1 Jj SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655-9557 Fax-(435)-647-5714 SUBJECT: '7 C5 1)yro -5 00?T Pi _ 9K, wo ru 5 Ho UfLilo Z +T 14,41(,wA-j 16 Q Isgo e5 1G) P(, f 7Z_5 4 -on) 7 Ay- -77h' Z46119 - - ZS Vsz 0 J'� olF t�vZz 1-f15 i 1 Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane; Park JOB TITLE 4 G� �' �' 1 BY DATE 7 i_ �[) SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655 -9557 m Fax- (435)- 647 -5714 SUBJECT: - ;2� 45= Cmrs l 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 _ 1�/� L L D FMS W I VV �,vrYtvL'1 �1/�i � 3 , t _ t_ 1/Vl.vo _ —; __.. + 4 vSatj� S per . lGa°l�_6 -2 - G 5 v= 't2_ G t . CS fir, 3: R a w (.f A./(, q lt�F"t (�-►V 5 R� `�' � , = _ t 2,S p�' 11 �6 -- C -�� cl_,�- -Z 6 7 = 2� w` 9 o f 6 w pU= 1,i 62o cb?o t7 -1 4 r!3i� ,0 11 WA lk f�z 13 '.. _.. 14 15 vv . 4 O 16 19 1 W4( �Yt�" e_ �M vv a 1 20 - 2, /t 22 e � (I� i -5 , 4 u 23 24 jA- 7 -I �� ✓� 3 T . _ 1 %. <2 - ice /1.:�. 255 27 26 i 29 �T M/ pb-7 I T (i� _ 60 Pv vv( ( 63 9 r(IF it CIZ 9�i S 9�r,� I I mvtv 31 / 32 , O W+0- Jarratt Engineering, Inc Structural Engineering Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane Park City, Utah 84098 (435) 655 -9557 JOB TITLE A M- �] �y� /_ �'��V 1 , BY DATE JOB NO. 7�/J CHECKED SHEET , ^ 3 OF ,/Y SUBJECT: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 _ 1�/� L L D FMS W I VV �,vrYtvL'1 �1/�i � 3 , t _ t_ 1/Vl.vo _ —; __.. + 4 vSatj� S per . lGa°l�_6 -2 - G 5 v= 't2_ G t . CS fir, 3: R a w (.f A./(, q lt�F"t (�-►V 5 R� `�' � , = _ t 2,S p�' 11 �6 -- C -�� cl_,�- -Z 6 7 = 2� w` 9 o f 6 w pU= 1,i 62o cb?o t7 -1 4 r!3i� ,0 11 WA lk f�z 13 '.. _.. 14 15 vv . 4 O 16 19 1 W4( �Yt�" e_ �M vv a 1 20 - 2, /t 22 e � (I� i -5 , 4 u 23 24 jA- 7 -I �� ✓� 3 T . _ 1 %. <2 - ice /1.:�. 255 27 26 i 29 �T M/ pb-7 I T (i� _ 60 Pv vv( ( 63 9 r(IF it CIZ 9�i S 9�r,� I I mvtv 31 / 32 , O W+0- A A , 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ;.. 2 C iz "t, S 3 4 L. _ 1 69 e 5 fA-PF "fr WCG= 105 `, w = Z3 nf [ o` W1'- # 2 S e 3? GR avt Y O L40 M vU 0 10 _ ri W A-( L c PIV D- 7 1�1. ` V, G 0 ' L/f _ Lr, _ 12 13 Q A `.... •V.�VirJ� 67 n _c7 AC/rV C m P 14 - 16 ,, -(eta rz. WAC L 6 w m a—T M F2 z Lo4v cn\,k 16 �... �..- V 7Z .. 3-� 6) - -7570 P n�. 20 W 21 WAt 4r,%--f 6 _ ;rGp,pvf- 22 s p y ) . /� / wry A Vvv 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 C V 1- 4 W R v Q r- v -�' rTL I_ VV� s rs 1!� 3� -n r 1 Q `` wht� W, Z 3 -1 Gz') - p nw vvccz - Z4' Cm vvl�) e. I I( Ga o'- I ''v Y91/1 Jarratt Engineering, Inc Structural Engineering Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane JOB TITLE -/ BY �NJ DATE JOB NO. CHECKED SHEET OF '10 Park City, Utah 84098 (435) 655 - 9557 {J ,{' `� „� SUBJECT: , 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ;.. 2 C iz "t, S 3 4 L. _ 1 69 e 5 fA-PF "fr WCG= 105 `, w = Z3 nf [ o` W1'- # 2 S e 3? GR avt Y O L40 M vU 0 10 _ ri W A-( L c PIV D- 7 1�1. ` V, G 0 ' L/f _ Lr, _ 12 13 Q A `.... •V.�VirJ� 67 n _c7 AC/rV C m P 14 - 16 ,, -(eta rz. WAC L 6 w m a—T M F2 z Lo4v cn\,k 16 �... �..- V 7Z .. 3-� 6) - -7570 P n�. 20 W 21 WAt 4r,%--f 6 _ ;rGp,pvf- 22 s p y ) . /� / wry A Vvv 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 C V 1- 4 W R v Q r- v -�' rTL I_ VV� s rs 1!� 3� -n r 1 Q `` wht� W, Z 3 -1 Gz') - p nw vvccz - Z4' Cm vvl�) e. I I( Ga o'- I ''v Y91/1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 � n 2 '1 PtFfrt -S 3 4 v 4 �hT 2 �'f hoanS wwti► -O. 5 (4- 9 W why.` 10 - - C(L poom (a n oU Ic ,3 �.` Z 6l Go s� a �� Po _ 14 WLL _ SO P� 4 5 LO VE ROOF LOAV� l � l 17 18 -4 l 9 p(, WR 19 n. ( 9,` 20 V11 21 22. -.,_ C _ 'q 0 j ry 154vL. - Ww pw LL 23 25 \ wW ' I � PSG \A/ rj _6 (169 P T1 -oo< 3�i�?GL Q�ttL Qr�L o il 27 29 30 ` 31 32 Jarratt Engineering, Inc Structural Engineering Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane JOB TITLE n I V BY 1' PJ DATE JOB NO. 1' Park City, Utah 84098 (435) 655 -9557 �GvYC�y] CHECKED SHEET nA ! OF 1 V l 6 SUBJECT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 � n 2 '1 PtFfrt -S 3 4 v 4 �hT 2 �'f hoanS wwti► -O. 5 (4- 9 W why.` 10 - - C(L poom (a n oU Ic ,3 �.` Z 6l Go s� a �� Po _ 14 WLL _ SO P� 4 5 LO VE ROOF LOAV� l � l 17 18 -4 l 9 p(, WR 19 n. ( 9,` 20 V11 21 22. -.,_ C _ 'q 0 j ry 154vL. - Ww pw LL 23 25 \ wW ' I � PSG \A/ rj _6 (169 P T1 -oo< 3�i�?GL Q�ttL Qr�L o il 27 29 30 ` 31 32 Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering Consultant JOB TITLE BY 17q DATE 6 ) 05 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane; Park SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655-9557 Fax- (435)- 647 -5714 /� SUBJECT: � . �' 1, 014 10 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN /06 Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: grid 5 Bowling \/\/= -Zq nF R/ -v 441 By: PNJ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME: 08:56 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 1,548.1 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 2,834.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL Design Shear, Vu = 325.2 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 7.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 20.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 31.48 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 16.01 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.064 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.119 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on.min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 1.68 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ I-- - - - - -P -Delta Results--- - - - - - I Delta Delta I Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) #3 0.35 1.32 1,857.2 2,883.3 8,505.1 8.00 #4 0.67 1.67 1,939.1 2,702.7 5,757.6 16.00 #5 0.98 2.14 2,051.5 2,283.5 4,273.1 32.00 #6 1.08 2.28 2,084.5 2,203.9 3,778.2 48.00 #7 0.88 1.87 1,985.6 2,702.7 3,778.2 48.00 #8 0.75 1.59 1,922.3 3,262.4 3,778.2 48.00 #9 0.66 1.40 1,877.0 3,839.9 3,778.2 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Per IBC 2000 2108.9.2.1, bar size is limited to #8 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M 9 Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: grid 5 Bowling �. # 1 I W i �,� S By: PNJ ____ _______________________________ __ esF===== __________________________ TIME: 08:48 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 1,285.5 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 2,834.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL Design Shear, Vu = 315.4 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 7.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 20.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 31.48 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 16.01 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.064 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.119 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on.mih. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, o = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, o = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 1.68 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ 1 ------- P -Delta Results--- - - - - -1 I Delta Delta Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) #3 0.10 1.61 1,662.5 1,846.4 5,757.6 16.00 #4 0.28 1.95 1,742.3 1,746.9 4,273.1 32.00 --- #5 0.36 1.98 1,749.9 1,780.2 3,778.2 48.00 #6 0.30 1.56 1,653.2 2,203.9 3,778.2 48.00 #7 0.26 1.29 1,587.7 2,702.7 3,778.2 48.00 #8 0.24 1.11 1,545.5 3,262.4 3,778.2 48.00 #9 0.22 0.98 1,515.2 3,839.9 3,778.2 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Per IBC 2000 2108.9.2.1, bar size is limited to #8 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN -------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- - JQ Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: Grids G between 2 & 7 fl -v-- -#-Z By: PNJ ---------------------------------------------------- - - - - - -- TIME: 09:03 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 3,270.7 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 1,846.5 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL Design Shear, Vu = 501.2 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 26.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 32.42 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 16.01 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081 in-^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, a = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.18 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ I-- - - - - -P - Delta Results--- - - - - -I I Delta Delta Bar Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) #3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #4 0.84 2.25 3,615.9 5,509.3 10,735.9 8.00 #5 1.31 2.94 3,720.8 4,524.4 7,050.2 16.00 #6 1.48 3.16 3,755.3 4,334.2 5,722.6 24.00 #7 1.52 3.19 3,759.1 4,410.6 5,058.8 32.00 #8 1.71 3.51 3,808.7 3,985.6 4,395•.0 48.00 #9 1.50 3.06 3,740.5 4,786.6 4,395.0 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M ll Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: Theatre grid A3 v V ' - - - - -� - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- -------- By_ - PNJ --- ----- - - - - -- ------_-_--_---_-------------- TIME: 09:10 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 2,062.4 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 2,065.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL Design Shear, Vu = 408.4 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL P. U 11 OY(S I&M.42&Vl f &F Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 7.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 21.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 33.05 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.064 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.119 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, s = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, m = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 1.76 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ I-- - - - - -P -Delta Results--- - - - - -I I Delta Delta I Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) #3 0.93 2.43 2,479.4 2,729.2 8,505.1 8.00 #4 0.68 1.72 2,357.5 4,222.7 8,505.1 8.00 #5 1.36 2.92 2,562.5 2,607.2 4,767.9 24.00 #6 1.36 2.86 2,552.3 2,729.2 4,273.1 32.00 #7 1.32 2.74 2,532.4 2,909.3 3,976.2 40.00 #8 1.27 2.61 2,511.0 3,114.9 3,778.2 48.00 #9 1.12 2.28 2,452.6 3,702.9 3,778.2 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Per IBC 2000 2108.9.2.1, bar size is limited to #8 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN AI Z Project : American Entertainment Rexburg By: PNJ Location: Theatre grid 1 ,/V-- TIME: 09:22 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) o = 0.80 ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 4,316.0 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 2,641.0 Lb / 12.00 in. *h' = 2.77 Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 * WL Design Shear, Vu = 530.4 Lb / 12.00 in. -- - - - - - P -Delta Results --- - - - - - I Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 * WL Delta ANALYSIS RESULTS: I ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width I Service = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, Bar Spa. t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, (ft -lb) h' = 33.00 ft. h' /t Ratio 2.08 = 41.14 10,735.9 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, o = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, o = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.77 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ -- - - - - - P -Delta Results --- - - - - - I Delta Delta I Bar I Service Ultimate Mu i BMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 0.73 2.08 4,773.3 6,032.4 10,735.9 8.00 #4 0.76 2.20 4,798.9 5,622.3 10,735.9 16.00 #5 0.75 2.16 4,789.9 5,759.4 10,735.9 24.00 #6 0.79 2.38 4,836.5 5,125.5 10,735.9 40.00 #7 0.76 2.20 4,798.9 5,622.3 10,735.9 48.00 #8 0.69 1.89 4,730.1 6,908.8 10,735.9 48.00 #9 0.65 1.67 4,683.0 8,289.5 10,735.9 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M (I Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: Theatre grid A.1 p_,_ .# By: PNJ TIME: 09:34 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 4,812.4 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 1,996.5 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL Design Shear, Vu = 582.1 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 33.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 41.14 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on.mih. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, a = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.77 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ I-- - - - - -P -Delta Results --- - - - - - I I Delta Delta I Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 0.96 2.50 5,227.2 5,739.1 10,735.9 8.00 #4 1.00 2.65 5,252.2 5,326.4 10,735.9 16.00 #5 0.99 2.60 5,243.4 5,464.4 10,735.9 24.00 #6 0.96 2.50 5,227.2 5,739.1 10,735.9 32.00 #7 1.00 2.65 5,252.2 5,326.4 10,735.9 48.00 #8 0.89 2.24 5,185.2 6,620.9 10,735.9 48.00 #9 0.82 1.97 5,137.1 8,010.5 10,735.9 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN m 4 ---------------------------- Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: Theatre grid D.9 gj.ri #6 By: PNJ TIME: 09:39 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 4,058.9 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 1,876.5 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL Design Shear, Vu = 539.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 30.50 ft. h' /t Ratio = 38.03 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, o = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, o = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.56 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ -- - - - - - P -Delta Results--- - - - - - I Delta Delta Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 0.47 1.55 4,298.9 5,684.2 10,735.9 8.00 #4 0.48 1.64 4,314.5 5,271.2 10,735.9 16.00 #5 0.48 1.60 4,307.3 5,409.2 10,735.9 24.00 #6 0.50 1.76 4,334.3 4,770.8 10,735.9 40.00 #7 0.48 1.64 4,314.5 5,271.2 10,735.9 48.00 #8 0.46 1.40 4,276.9 6,567.1 10,735.9 48.00 #9 0.44 1.25 4,252.9 7,958.4 10,735.9 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN MIS Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: Grid 2 Interior wall ft f__ # - By: PNJ _____________________________________ TIME: 09:45 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 1,775.3 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 1,935.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 0.9 *DL +1 *E Design Shear, Vu = 282.4 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.$ *LL +1 *E ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 7.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 26.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 40.92 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.064 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.119 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on. min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, o = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.18 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ I-- - - - - -P - Delta Results--- - - - - - Delta Delta I Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 1.58 1.49 2,014.6 2,702.9 8,505.1 8.00 #4 1.12 1.08 1,948.9 4,201.0 8,505.1 8.00 #5 1.65 1.55 2,023.9 2,580.6 8,505.1 24.00 #6 1.58 1.49 2,014.6 2,702.9 8,505.1 32.00 #7 1.49 1.42 2,002.8 2,883.5 8,505.1 40.00 #8 1.41 1.34 1,989.5 3,089.7 8,505.1 48.00 #9 1.24 1.19 1,965.5 3,679.5 8,505.1 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Per IBC 2000 2108.9.2.1, bar size is limited to #8 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M16 Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: Grid 1.4 Interior wall $�S By: PNJ __________________________________ TIME: 10:44 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 2,875.9 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 1,890.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load combination = 0.9 *DL +1 *E Design Shear, Vu = 356.2 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1 *E ANALYSIS RESULTS: Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 33.00 ft. h' /t Ratio = 41.14 Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) Flexure Reduction Factor, o = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, e = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.77 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ I-- - - - - -P -Delta Results--- - - - - -I I Delta Delta I Bar I Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 1.19 1.16 3,058.3 3,375.1 10,735.9 16.00 #4 1.08 1.06 3,041.9 3,875.1 10,735.9 24.00 #5 1.12 1.10 3,047.8 3,675.7 10,735.9 40.00 #6 1.03 1.01 3,034.7 4,158.7 10,735.9 48.00 #7 0.89 0.88 3,014.5 5,277.4 10,735.9 48.00 #8 0.80 0.79 2,999.4 6,573.2 10,735.9 48.00 #9 0.74 0.73 2,990.4 7,964.2 10,735.9 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Y: PNJ Location: Theater Doors yr Cl ----- - - - - -- TIME: 11:02 AM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: (Based On Statics) 0 = 0.80 ------------------------------------ Design Moment, Mu = 9,315.5 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Pu = 6,203.3 Lb / 12.00 in. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 * WL Design Shear, Vu = 1,138.2 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1.2 *DL +0.5 *LL +1.6 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: I Delta Delta ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, oMn t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, (in.) h' = 33.00 ft. h' /t Ratio --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 = 41.14 N/A Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081 in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on,mih. vertical steel (coils ervative) Flexure Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.80 Shear Reduction Factor, 0 = 0.60 All. Service Load Deflection, 0.007 *h' = 2.77 in. DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ -- - - - - - P -Delta Results--- - - - - -I I Delta Delta Bar i Service Ultimate Mu I oMn oVn Bar Spa. Size (in.) (in.) (ft -lb) (ft -lb) (lbs) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #5 2.03 3.78 11,258.7 14,802.0 10,735.9 8.00 #6 2.35 4.47 11,602.8 11,745.2 10,735.9 16.00 #7 2.06 3.84 11,289.3 14,476.5 10,735.9 16.00 #8 2.17 4.09 11,414.6 13,252.7 10,735.9 24.00 #9 2.22 4.20 11,466.9 12,795.9 10,735.9 32.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per IBC 2000 2106.5.2 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN /tit�Yj Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: grid G door ((. ��` L----------------------------------------------- - - -By: PNJ ------------------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME: 02:07 PM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: Moment, Ms = 4,951.2 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Ps = 4,658.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1 *DL +1 *WL Eccentricity at Moment, e = M/P = 12.76 in. NOTE: Max. moment is located in Zone C, (e > 2d/3) Wall is cracked, steel is stressed in tension. Max. Shear, Vs = 1,625.8 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1 *DL +1 *LL +1 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: Design Strip Width Actual Wall Thickness, Effective Height, Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. Maximum spacing Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical = 12.00 in. t = 9.63 in. h' = 26.00 ft. Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. = 0.081.n. ^2 / 12.00 in. = 0.150 1n ^2 / ft. = 48 inches steel (conservative) DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ All. Moment Bar Fa, psi fv, psi @ Axial Load Bar Spa. Size --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (4/3 *.25 *f'm *R) (V /b'd) (P= 4,658.0 lb) (in. o.c.) #3 N/A N/A N/A N/A #4 194.30 17.77 5,358.7 8.00 #5 194.30 17.77 6,124.7 8.00 #6 194.30 17.77 5,520.2 16.00 #7 194.30 17.77 5,358.7 24.00 #8 194.30 17.77 4,973.5 40.00 #9 194.30 17.77 5,058.9 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per ACI 99 1.13.6.3 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M (C1 Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: grid G door By: PNJ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME: 02:07 PM Page: 3 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 MASONRY WALL INTERACTION DIAGRAM: (WIND / SEISMIC LOADS) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective Wall Height = 26.00 ft. All. Axial Stress, Fa = 194.30 psi. Actual Wall Thickness = 9.63 in. All. Bending Stress, Fb = 666.67 psi. Depth to c.g. Steel = 7.63 in. All. Steel Stress, Fs = 32.00 ksi. Design Width = 12.00 in. Reinforcing Design = #5 @ 8 in. o.c. Axial Moment 22442 I * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4247 I * 20839 I * 5602 I * 19236 I * 6065 I * 17633 I * 6065 I * 16030 I * 6061 I * 14427 I * 6056 I * 12824 I * 6051 I * 11221 I * 6050 I * 9618 I * 6055 I * 8015 I * 6067 I * 6412 ► * 6088 I * 4809 I * 6121 I * 3206 I * 6166 I * 1603 I * 6224 I * 0 I * 6296 ------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- NOTES: Axial Load = Lb, Moment = ft -lb Positive moment is defined as moment which causes compression on the outside face of wall. Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN /V1 It n Project : American Entertainment Rexbur Location: grid 5 door r VN __ ---------- By: - PNJ ____________-====___________________________________- TIME: 02:52 PM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: Moment, Ms = 3,199.6 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Ps = 2,628.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 0.6 *DL +1 *WL Eccentricity at Moment, e = M/P = 14.61 in. NOTE: Max. moment is located in Zone C, (e > 2d/3) Wall is cracked, steel is stressed in tension. Max. Shear, Load Combination ANALYSIS RESULTS: Vs = 678.4 / 12.00 in. = 1 *DL +1 *LL +1 *WL Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 7.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 19.50 ft. Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.064.in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.119 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ All. Moment Bar Fa, psi fv, psi @ Axial Load Bar Spa. Size --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (4/3 *.25 *f'm *R) (V /b'd) (P= 2,628.0 lb) (in. o.c.) #3 N/A N/A N/A N/A #4 216.79 10.05 3,270.8 8.00 #5 216.79 10.05 3,723.7 8.00 #6 216.79 10.05 3,367.3 16.00 #7 216.79 10.05 3,270.8 24.00 #8 216.79 10.05 3,258.1 32.00 #9 216.79 10.05 3,270.8 40.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per ACI 99 1.13.6.3 Per IBC 2000 2107.2.4, bar size is limited to #8 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M 2 Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: grid 5 door By: PNJ TIME: 02:52 PM Page: 3 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 MASONRY WALL INTERACTION DIAGRAM: (WIND / SEISMIC LOADS) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective Wall Height = 19.50 ft. All. Axial Stress, Fa = 216.79 psi. Actual Wall Thickness = 7.63 in. All. Bending Stress, Fb = 666.67 psi. Depth to c.g. Steel = 5.63 in. All. Steel Stress, Fs = 32.00 ksi. Design Width = 12.00 in. Reinforcing Design = #4 @ 8 in. o.c. Axial Moment 19836 I * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3203 I 18419 I * 3651 I 17002 I * 3632 I 15585 I * 3603 I 14169 I * 3567 I 12752 I * 3524 I 11335 I * 3479 I 9918 I * 3433 I 8501 I * 3388 I 7084 I * 3348 I 5667 I * 3314 I * 4251 I * 3288 I 2834 I * 3272 I 1417 I * 3268 I 0 I * 3275 ------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTES: Axial Load = Lb, Moment = ft -lb Positive moment is defined as moment which causes compression on the outside face of wall. Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M IT Project : American Entertainment Rexburg Location: girder at grid G and 2.5 ��$ rZ By: PNJ ------------------ - - - - -- - - TIME: 03:38 PM Page: 1 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F O R M A I N W A L L ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DESIGN LOADS: Moment, Ms = 0.0 ft -lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Ps = 18,000.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1 *DL +1 *LL Eccentricity at Moment, e = M/P = 0.00 in. NOTE: Max. moment is located in Zone A, (e < t /6) Wall is uncracked, steel is stressed in compression. Max. Shear, Vs = 303.3 / 12.00 in. Load Combination = 1 *DL +1 *LL +1 *WL ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = 12.00 in. Actual Wall Thickness, t = 9.63 in. Effective Height, h' = 25.00 ft. Seismic Force, (IBC 2000 1620.1.7) Fp = 21.34 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.081.in. ^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = 0.150 in ^2 / ft. Maximum spacing = 48 inches Ref. IBC 2000 2106.5.2/ACI 99 1.13.6.3 * Min horiz. steel based on min. vertical steel (conservative) DESIGN RESULTS: ------------------------------------ All. Moment Bar Fa, psi fv, psi @ Axial Load Bar Spa. Size (1.0 *.25 *f'm *R) (V /b'd) (P= 18,000.0 lb) (in. o.c.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #3 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 16.00 #4 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 24.00 #5 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 40.00 #6 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 48.00 #7 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 48.00 #8 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 48.00 #9 157.62 5.25 4,066.9 48.00 Max. vertical bar spacing is 48 inch for running bond and 24 inch for stack bond per ACI 99 1.13.6.3 Masonry Wall: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN M Z0 Project American Entertainment Rexburg Location: girder at grid G and 2.5 By: PNJ ------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME: 03:38 PM Page: 2 DATE: 06 -28 -2003 MASONRY WALL INTERACTION DIAGRAM: (DEAD + LIVE LOAD ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective Wall Height = 25.00 ft. All. Axial Stress, Fa = 157.62 psi. Actual Wall Thickness = 9.63 in. All. Bending Stress, Fb = 500.00 psi. Depth to c.g. Steel = 4.81 in. All. Steel Stress, Fs = 24.00 ksi. Design Width = 12.00 in. Reinforcing Design = #3 @ 16 in. o.c. Axial Moment 18205 I * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4056 I * 16905 I * 4125 I * 15604 I * 3990 I * 14304 I * 3843 I * 13003 I * 3664 I * 11703 I * 3460 I * 10403 I * 3233 I 9102 I * 2987 I 7802 I * 2724 I * 6502 ► * 2449 I 5201 I * 2169 I * 3901 I * 1892 I 2601 I * 1627 I 1300 I * 1196 I 0 I * 736 ------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- NOTES: Axial Load = Lb, Moment = ft -lb Positive moment is defined as moment which causes compression on the outside face of wall. Structural Engineering Consultant 3 Jarratt Engineering, Inc JOB TITLE jL/ H l� [ G BY n� DATE n JOB NO. h l.i t V1 P 1' i! � 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane Park City, Utah 84098 SUBJECT CHECKED SHEET r,{) OF (435) 655 -9557 f � c x \,J v A � 0 0 M j .. L z � a o c a c7 A a g r, R & O O w � � G v O w 0 W o � 00 NA A v .� v u o � d y � r r LMT A � oO M M Z O c O � � o C. 3 N � Q � p O a o w o 0 � N 00 N 4i cc V �' ^ jarratt Engineering Inc. JOB TITLE: BY: DATE-_7 103 Structural Enzineering Consultant �vn SHEET: OF 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane Park City, Utah 94098, (435) 655-9557 zr 5 h 5L Ec ''--------�-------------------------- ---�— ---------� T��L' - -- --- r� [l �______________-� - ' ' rz- ....... ... .......... ... ........... .. .......... . ........... .. ........... .. ...... ... .. ....... ........................... . ........... ........... . ........... .. ........... .. .......... ... .......... ... ........ ............................ ........... F our AftrAve .......... .. .......... .. .......... .. .. ..... ... ............ .. ........... .. . ......... .. .... .... .. ..... ...... .. ..... . .......... .... .... ... .......... ........... ... .. k. 1 . ........... .. ........... .. ........... ... .......... ... .......... ... ........ %Kt . ... ......... I: — ;: .M. .5 n � ........... ; 6 .. . .. ... .. ...... ... . . .............. ... ........ ..... f-I .. . .. ........... .. ........... .. .......... .. .......... ... ... n .... .. ........ . ..... ..... . ................ � .......................... ............. . . ... . . ...... .............. ..... A2 MAT w wAlt T2 . . . . . . . . . ...... '! ........ .. ........... .. ........... .. ......... ... .......... ... ........ .......... ... .......... ... . ......... ... . ....... . .......... .. ........... .. .... M .... .. ....... ... ..... N — - ----------- /I H r ILI .. ......... ....... .. ........... .. ........... .. ........... ... .......... ... .......... .. ......... ........... .. .. . .......... ... ........... . ...... .... .. ........... .. ........... .. ........... ...... ..jt L v n . .... ..... ...... .. ...... L L U 7 w KAT loo 000 1. TV ........ .. ........... .. .......... ... .......... ... . . ..... .. ...... .... .. ........ ... . . ... .... .. ........... .. ...... .. ........ .. xi .......... .. ....... .. .......... ... ........ 4 .......... .. .......... .. .......... ----------- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... .. ..... ... .. . ------ ILI, rzcl .......... IQ —.4 AJL. J �;.. I ....................... . ...... .. . . .. ....................... 1-4 ;. ... ........ ......... jIT -------- - ........... .. ......... ..... - ........ . ......... .. ...... t . .. ..... ... .. s 9to r C':'\D'O' c ..... u'" m" ........ e''i . ............ n : , ..., y uocuM,, en s\dat ... a'ffle**s \ACAD'file americarr ........... ..... .. ....... .. ... .......... ... ........... .. ........... .. ........... .. ........... .. ..... ... .. ... ............ .. .. .......... ... ........... . . ........... . ........... .. ........... .. .......... .. .......... ... .......... ... ........ .......... ... .......... ... ........ ..... .. .... ... ... :� .. ........ :�-� . ........... .. ........... .. ........... .. .......... .. .......... . . ...... ... ........... .. ........... .. ........... . . . ... ........ . . . . . . . . . . . AL .. ............ rl .. ........... .. ........... .. .......... ... .......... .... .. ......... ..... ... .......... .. ........... .. ........... .. ........... .. ........ . ................... .......... .............. ... ...... tr Tii . ... ................... 7W . ......... . ..... .. ......... ... .......... ... ........ . .......... . ....... . . ....... .. .... m .... .. . .... .. . . ....... L ..... Er .. . ..... ....... ... ..... .... .. .. ........... .. ... ---------- - I - ---------- 7 i RA"M, t ...... .. ... ........... ...... ........ ...... .. ........... .. ........ .... .... .. ..... ........... .. .......... ... .... m ........ ...... .. . . . . ...... ... ....... ........... .. ........... .. ...... ........................... ........ ...... . 4 ...................... M U IT It . . . ....... .. .......... ... .... . .. ......... ..... .. ........... .. .. .. ........... .. ...... ......... ...... ... ..... ......... .. .......... ... .......... ... ........ it--------- ---- - -------- .. .......... .. ......... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- - - - - - - . ....... . . . ............. AP ........... .. ........... .. ...... .. -------- ------------ ...... .. .. -------- - -- --------- - n : ......... .. ...... \d*a*"t ... a .... .. .. ..... \D'o .... c ..... u'' m" en'" t s a , i n ent� a ocu m es american, Jarratt Engineering, Inc Structural Engineering Consultant JOB TITLE ,, /n ff( N BY: �r� Jos No. '''1 SUBJECT CHECKED SHEET f OF L 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane • Park City, Utah 84098 (435) 655 -9557 WALL LOADS r y , --r�- SEISMIC FORCES IUo RI — 5 9 vrtt- W 20 is +- _2 35 :� 2 P5F rel "j AREA MARK RF. OR FL AREA DL PSF FORCE WALL LOADS TOTAL FORCE SEIS. FORCE I 13S�rcn� i li� -7 13Z C ZZ -41A Z41� _ J99CGq t� Ito 7- 1 351K 64 LI�CI�t' G-1 11 -7 �q0 s t GZ Z�c� 7�16 1 10-1 C , 140 4 ci ( t 161 on Z7 G Z6Y1 6 t 1� _ wog z, 7--4A 24 ( c41C20 ss S Cd �4 �I �1 7"► I Zw ziz) z l ►� �o� 11 Iq� 2�� z Ja Engineering, Inc Structural Engineering Consultant JOB TITLE /^��/ N ,�� G BY'- h� Jos No. t r F lI i "►�' 1� 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane • Park City, Utah 84098 SUBJECT CHECKED SHEETf COF (435) 655 -9557 WALL LOADS SEISMIC FORCES F,4 vaf n- AREA h-IAR{ RF. OR FL AREA DL PSF FORCE WALL LOADS TOTAL FORCE SEIS. FORCE 706K G4 365 33 Y1 2 6q 2$5K ZZK 3 14 6(51 l G( ) 16) 7 63K 16 00+ h-e)) 99 K 2 5K 5 { 5 3-7( 6-,) 7 Iz2 I1_ - 7 (--D'4Z 1 U] 6 g l (�6 I C) IZfK -11 �3_ �1 ► �� 1 �� !� = 2 6 K Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering Consultant JOB TITLE 6rn G BY h-0 DATE n 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane; Park SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655 -9557 f� Fax- (435)- 647 -5714 SUBJECT: — � -�j —_fin ►1.c�FS — - - -- -Z HK L/3 15 Mt N- - 01V S tt -s o"' n — _ -- TA vF Z Z i _! C� G o np f-Q Vk- A XI — q n f lc o K 61 it- Vfc o ), R'l -- - 1- f , F `7 _ 4- 10 _ - - -- -- - (Z�= Z 1 2°I �� Zil 617= l.. 1� G �i, t `...1,?s °r _ — I Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane; Park JOB TITLE BY DATE j N-J SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655-9557 Fax-(435)-647-5714 SUBJECT: 0 M —'s q -- ra ft ( -f — t L � L 1n)A h+ ZQK 1 4t - ZJO Q(Aa .rA A C) V< I A.."N 9KCIr Il o r? orp vwc-Al- 'Z 4- 3/1 4-n T) co('-t/ry �OR- c -z - 7- - Z V rlv-. CC) 2L614- p-j/ CF qcDP� b -Al — V C � r Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural Engineering; Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane,- Park JOB TITLE BY r tli DATES A 3 SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655 -9557 [ -� Fax- (435) -647 -5714 SUBJECT: — - - - o Lac- Tn Y\, h'1" G �� -- 1 c 41� Ai l r C o ► vn D f�C �'( f7>` ftGN wa ll ) _ c ,,0 _ l2 A>t _ S� 14 - FT; IT Jarratt Engineering Inc. Structural En ' eerinQ Consultant 8830 N. Upper Lando Lane; Park JOB TITLE G � C BY DATE Ni SHEET OF City, Utah 84098, (435) 655 -9557 LB Fax - (435)- 647 -5714 SUBJECT: Envelope Compliance Test Results American_Family_Entertainment Project Summary information Name: American Famny_Enter � l UVrpJJ: TW '._.�.. V Co d act (%itv /StxtP.17b Rexhuro, Idaho 83440 Climate Location: Idaho Fails, Idaho Standard EnvStd climate data'is used for compliance Fioor Area (R2): 40 I= Ala!! A ren /Av?1• 29220 Window Area 0129): 941 Window Wall Ratio: 0.03 Gross Roof Area (f12): 40669 SKyiignt Fwat Raiio. u.0 i _� rs aye M4011 A0P... I'loor Area lfR0 008 -4 OF \ACD D. Compliance Summary - PASSES ulcer ne4nsut- lrla11 A-hew a Grath- Ma.S.s -Cone. 16904 0.151 n.a. 0.0 0.0 3-2 EPF Proposed Standard Marain f \VVI, 283-Q a &13 1775 I n, St a hfs 556 696 138 Walls 8983 8315 -668 Below -G Walls 0 0 0 t 0 U u '13"s 0 0 0 i naAlnhtino Powntini 9 9 I 0 1 Total 12387 13633 1246 C_1 ulcer ne4nsut- lrla11 A-hew a Grath- Ma.S.s -Cone. 16904 0.151 n.a. 0.0 0.0 3-2 Masonry Units, Partial Grout -No Framing - 941 1.25 0.7 0.80 0.58 exposed _ block (User Defined) C -2 User Detinea -wan, Above Grade-Mass -Gone. i i375 0.051 n.a. v ^.0 V.v j Masonry Units Partial Groui-No Fia.Ti y ^° I inaa:lat�+ti asmrsesr!_hInd . (! 4car t7t�f4neattl 1421 C -3 User Defined-Roof-Insulation Entirely Above 40189 0.039 n.a. 0.0 0.0 Deck or Mass -roof (User Defined) I Total 68468 'ode Description Area U- fac S HGC SC Tvis 3-2 Window - Operable -Ail Frame Types, Single- Tinted - 941 1.25 0.7 0.80 0.58 Window_Single glazing 3 - 3 Skylight-Plastic, With Cu : -WoocL%.7vTinted- 480 0.84 0.37 0.43 225 Skylight_D uh-le glez n0- aMIicJpntyrsrhnnate total 1421 krea F enestration Schedule Space Category: building Floor Area (ft2): 40 Gross Wall Area (fl2): 29220 Window Area (ft2j: 941 Window Wall Ratio: 0.03 Gwo" Roof Area (ft2): 40669 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.01 Skylight Area (it2): 480 Dual Area (ft2): 0 Surfaces Name Type Const. Code Area Orient Notes ASHRAERESNA Standard 90.1-2001 07130103 •s Envelope Compliance Teat Results American_Family Entertainment north _wall Wall C-1 3584 North n.a. north wall Wall C -2 3504 North n.a. east Wall C -1 4355 North n.a. i east wail Ydail C -2 2844 North ri.a. co ut,1 ;Y$l! Wa!! C -1 5135 North n.a. South wall Wall C -2 2956 North n.a. west wall Wall C -1 3817 North n.e. west well Well C-2 30% North n.a. roof Roof C -3 44569 rda n.a. T„ rai 59889 window — giass Window G -2 - -- 63 North n.a. Opezlnys VVindo., 0-2 195 North n.a. i Openings Openings Window G-2 98 North n.a. Window G-2 472 North n.a. ( Openings Window G-2 112 North Me. skylights Skylight G-3 480 n/a n.s. Tate; _ 1421 ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 -2001 07/30103 08/08/2003 09:42 2086843218 Aug -07 -03 03:15P MTN WEST ELECTRIC permit Nnrnber Lighting Compliance Certificate Checkod By/Datc 2001 iECC comeheck -EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2b Data fllenatoe: C.\Prograrn Files \Check \COMcheck- EzTeton Cover Village.eck Section 1: Protect Information Project Name: Designer /Contractor: Document Author:. Notes: Section x: General Information Building Use Description by: A New Dcvcloptrtent Plan for Teton Rivet' Village Payne Engineering Inc. • Eldon Paync August 7, 2003 Whole Building Type Retail Sales. Wholesale Showroom 19785 project Description (chock one): New Contraction _ Addition w Altaratian + Uecoaditionod Shell (File Affidavit) Section 3: Requirements C>becklist Bldg. I DcpL I Use I l 1 I interior Liphdag L Total actual watts most be less than or equal to total allowed watts I Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies y" :37592 29914 YES I I Exterior Ligbting f 1 ( 2. Effi greater than 45 lumens/W Exceptions: of historic buildings; signage; safety or security lighting: I Specialized lighting kghlighting features low-voltage landscape lighting. Controls, switeblog, and Wiriog C 1 I 3. lrtdepetslertt opntrols for each space (switeh/oocupaacy scorer). I Ex"Ption: Areas that must be contimmusly lighted, i 1 I 4. Master switch at entry to hotel/tnWel guest to=' uniform light redaction capability. [ 1 I S. Two switches or dimmer in each space provide Exceptions: f Only one lumiaWre in **=. An occvpattt- sensing device romxots the am; The area is a corridor, storage. restroout or lobbS ; Arms that must be continiubty lighted. I Areas greater than 250 sq.& I j I 6. Photooell/astronotnical time switch an exterior lights. PAGE 02 P.02 08/08/2003 09:42 2086843218 MTN WEST ELECTRIC Aug -07 -03 O3:15P Lighting ,Application Wo>rk!;httt 2001 iECC t bMcheek -LP"l Software Version 2A Release 2b Section is Allowed Lighting Power Calculation S C D A Total A B Fixture Fixture Description ! Floor Allowed Allowed Area Watts Wans Retail Salve, Wholesale Showroom 19785 1.9 37592 1rotai Allowed Watts = 37592 Section Z: Actual Ligbting Power Calculation P. 03 Lighting PASSES: Design 20% better then code C D E F A B Fixture Fixture Description ! Lamps/ # of Fixture F Watt L > x2 1Q i.anxn� Fl 4 lamp recesssd fluor. / 48" T8 32W / Elect=ric 4 266 112 2 61 29792 122 F3 21amp surface fluor / 49" 78 32W / Electronic 2 Total Actual W ANE = 29914 Section I Complis "Ce Calculatio>at t6aa or equal to zero, the brrildirtf; complies• a! Watts if the Total Allowed vans mimm ft Total Aqu is greater Total Allawad Watts = 37592 Total Actual Watts = 29914 prOW CouVliat= w 7679 P. 03 Lighting PASSES: Design 20% better then code 08/08/2003 09:42 2086843218 MTN WEST ELECTRIC PAGE 04 Au -07 -03 O3:25h Exceptions: Areas requiring lighting outing daylight hoots I 1 ( 7. Tandem wired one -lamp and threc•fantp ballasted luminaires. � Exceptio Electronic lugh- frequency ballasts: Luminaires not on some switch Section 4: Compliance Statement The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other cakvlatiotu attbmitted with this pennit application. The proposed lighting system has boon designed to meet the 2001 IECC tegtdroments in COMcbeck EZ Version 2.4 Release 2b and to comply with the mandatory requirenents in the Roquiroments Checklist. d G' Prin al Lighting Designer Name iguatnct Aa P. 04 08!08/2003 09:42 2086843212 NlTH t4EST ELECTRIC PAGE 62 Aug -07 -03 03:15P P.02 permit Number Lighting Compliance Certificate checked By/Datc 2001 IECC COMcheck -EZ Software version 2.4 Rdeasc 2b Data filename: C:\Prograrn Files \Chcck \COMcbeck- EZTeton /river Village.cck Section 1: project Information Project Name: A New DcvclopMent Plan for Teton River Village Designer /Contractor: Payne Engineering Inc. Docurneat Author: Eldon Paync Notes: August 7, 2003 Section 2: Genera[ Inforntatwort Building Uge Description by_ Whole Building Type Retail Sales. Wholesale Showroom 19185 project Description (chock one): New Construction _ Addition _ Alteration _ , Unconditioned Shell (File Affidavit) Section 3: Requirements Checklist Bldg. I Dept. I Use [ I I Interior L+ehdolt 1 . Total 8OW watts most be less than or equal to total allowed watts I Allowed watts Actual Watts Complics(Y/N) 37592 29914 YES I I fzterlor Lighting I i I 2. Effilcacy ,greater than 45 lwnens/W Exceptions: ss f f gecurit. lighting: Specialized lighting highlighting teatittes of historic buildings; signag a : my o low - voltage landscape lighting. I Contrvls, Switching, and Wiring seASOr). ( l I 3, ladependew controls for each gpaec (switch/occ'upancy Exception: Areas that must be contimlously lighted, ( I I 4. Master switch at entry to hotcUmotol guest Tom' unifartn light reduction capability. [ 1 1 5. Two switches or dimmer in c2ch SPntotr P I Exceptions: device controls the area; I 0* one luminaire in space: An occuimnt -sCn ng I The am is a corridor, storage, restroom or lobby: Areas that must be contimuously lighted: Areas greater than 250 sq.$. 6. Photooell/astronotnical tithe switch on exterior lights. 08:'08/2003 09:42 2086643218 MTN WEST ELECTRIC Aug -07 -03 03_15P Lighting Application Worksheet 2001 tECC COMcheck.EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2h Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation B C D A Total Floor Allowed Allowed Area Watts Watts e (ft2) ( -N-QtW 2j (13 x-Q- Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom 1 " -, Total Allowed WH"s = 37592 Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation C D E F A B Lamps/ # of Fixturo Fixture Fixture Description ! W � Q x tamn ihscrivli�4LL�!&11s11� Pe< La tp / $stltast F_i F FI 41amp recessed fluor. / 48" T8 32W I Electronic 4 266 112 29792 F3 2 lamp surface fluor / 49 32W 1)rleotronic 2 2 61 122 Total Actual W AttS = 29914 Section 3: Compliance Calculation or equal to zero, the building COMP lies- lies [f the Total Allowed Watts minu the Total Actua Watts is greater than Total Allowed Watts = 37592 Total Actual Watts = 29914 project C "npliancc s 7678 PAGE 03 P.03 Lighting PASSES: Design 20% better than code 08/'0812003 09:42 2086843218 MTN WEST ELECTRIC F'AGE 04 AUg- -07 -03 O3:15P i Erceptiorrs: Areas requiring lighting during daylight hours [ 1 l 7 , Tandem wired one -lamp and thrcc•larrtp ballasted luminaires. � Exceptions: ballasts: Electronic high- frsqutncy lasts: Luminaires not on same snitch Section 4: Comphitace Stateintnt The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the brrilding plans, specifications and otter calmlatiom submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2001 1ECC requirements in COMcireck EZ Version 2.4 Release 2b and to comply with the mandatory requirrumts in the Requirements Checklist. Prill al Lighting Designer -Name ignattrrt Dat P. 04 Mechanical Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date 2000 IECC COMcheck -EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2c Data filename: Z:\Projects\2003\Action Mechanical \0337 Teton River Village \comcheck.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Name: Designer /Contractor: Document Author: Notes: Teton River Village Ken Harris Dee J Rammell Mechanical Only Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): Rexburg, Idaho Climate Zone: 16 Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 8693 Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 143 Project Description (check one): _ New Construction _ Addition _ Alteration _ Unconditioned Shell (File Affidavit) Section 3: Mechanical Systems List uanti System Type & Description 1 HVAC System 11: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =65 - <90 kBtu/h, Air- Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 8: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =90 - <135 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 10: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 7: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 9: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 6: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 5: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =90 - <135 kBtu/h, Air- Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 4: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 3: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =65 - <90 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 2: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 1: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone Permit Number Section 4: Requirements Checklist Bldg. Dept. Use Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 11 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 8 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements [ ] 3. Integrated air economizer is included Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 10 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 7 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 9 [ ] 1. Equipment minim efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 6 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 5 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements [ ] 3. Integrated air economizer is included Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 4 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 3 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 2 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 1 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable I. Load calculations per 1997 ASHRAE Fundamentals 2. Plant equipment and system capacity no greater than needed to meet loads Exception: Standby equipment automatically off when primary system is operating - Exception: Multiple units controlled to sequence operation as a function of load 3. Minimum one temperature control device per system 4. Minimum one humidity control device per installed humidification/dehumidification system 5. Thermostatic controls has 5 deg. F deadband - Exception: Thermostats requiring manual changeover between heating and cooling 6. Automatic Controls: Setback to 55 deg. F (heat) and 85 deg. F (cool); 7 -day clock, 2 -hour occupant override, 10 -hour backup - Exception: Continuously operating zones - Exception: 2 kW demand or less, submit calculations 7. Automatic shut -off dampers on exhaust systems and supply systems with airflow >3,000 cfin 8. Outside -air source for ventilation; system capable of reducing OSA to required minimum 9. R -5 supply and return air duct insulation in unconditioned spaces R -8 supply and return air duct insulation outside the building R -8 insulation between ducts and the building exterior when ducts are part of a building assembly - Exception: Ducts located within equipment - Exception: Ducts with interior and exterior temperature difference not exceeding 15 deg. F. 10. Ducts sealed - longitudinal seams on rigid ducts; transverse seams on all ducts; UL 181A or 181B tapes and mastics 11. Mechanical fasteners and sealants used to connect ducts and air distribution equipment 12. Operation and maintenance manual provided to building owner 13. Balancing devices provided in accordance with IMC 603.15 Section 5: Compliance Statement The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 2000 IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck -EZ Version 2.4 Release 2c and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. I A J1 (,mil 4" 1 if, b OJnlh/� Z Signa lg t�ure Principal Mechanical Designer -Name Date root Mechanical Requirements Description 2000 IECC COMcheck -EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2c Data filename: Z:\Projects\2003\Action Mechanical \0337 Teton River Village \comcheck.cck The following list provides more detailed description of the requirements in Section 4 of the Mechancal Compliance Certificate. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 11 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 8 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. 3. An integrated air economizer is required for individual cooling systems over 90 kBtu/h or 3,000 cfin in the selected climate. An integrated economizer allows simultaneous operation of outdoor -air and mechanical cooling. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 10 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 7 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 9 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 6 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 5 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. 3. An integrated air economizer is required for individual cooling systems over 90 kBtu/h or 3,000 cfin in the selected climate. An integrated economizer allows simultaneous operation of outdoor -air and mechanical cooling. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 4 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 3 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 2 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 1 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable 1. Design heating and cooling loads for the building must be determined using procedures equivalent to those in Chapters 27 and 28 of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals or an approved equivalent calculation procedure. 2. All equipment and systems must be sized to be no greater than needed to meet calculated loads. A single piece of equipment providing both heating and cooling must satisfy this provision for one function with the capacity for the other function as small as possible, within available equipment options. - Exception: The equipment and/or system capacity may be greater than calculated loads for standby purposes. Standby equipment must be automatically controlled to be off when the primary equipment and/or system is operating. - Exception: Multiple units of the same equipment type whose combined capacities exceed the calculated load are allowed if they are provided with controls to sequence operation of the units as the load increases or decreases. 3. Each heating or cooling system serving a single zone must have its own temperature control device. 4. Each humidification system must have its own humidity control device. 5. Thermostats controlling both heating and cooling must be capable of maintaining a 5 degree F deadband (a range of temperature where no heating or cooling is provided). - Exception: Deadband capability is not required if the thermostat does not have automatic changeover capability between heating and cooling. 6. The system or zone control must be a programmable thermostat or other automatic control meeting the following criteria:a) capable of setting back temperature to 55 degree F during heating and setting up to 85 degree F during coolingb) capable of automatically setting back or shutting down systems during unoccupied hours using 7 different day schedulesc) have an accessible 2 -hour occupant overrided) have a battery back -up capable of maintaining programmed settings for at least 10 hours without power. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on thermostats that control systems serving areas that operate continuously. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on systems with total energy demand of 2 kW (6,826 Btu/h) or less. 7. Outdoor -air supply systems with design airflow rates >3,000 cfin of outdoor air and all exhaust systems must have dampers that are automatically closed while the equipment is not operating. 8. The system must supply outside ventilation air as required by Chapter 4 of the International Mechanical Code. If the ventilation system is designed to supply outdoor -air quantities exceeding minimum required levels, the system must be capable of reducing outdoor -air flow to the minim required levels. 9. Air ducts must be insulated to the following levels:a) Supply and return air ducts for conditioned air located in unconditioned spaces (spaces neither heated nor cooled) must be insulated with a minimum of R -5. Unconditioned spaces include attics, crawl spaces, unheated basements, and unheated garages.b) Supply and return air ducts and plenums must be insulated to a minimum of R -8 when located outside the building.c) When ducts are located within exterior components (e.g., floors or roofs), minimum R -8 insulation is required only between the duct and the building exterior. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required on ducts located within equipment. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required when the design temperature difference between the interior and exterior of the duct or plenum does not exceed 15 degree F. 10. All joints, longitudinal and transverse seams, and connections in ductwork must be securely sealed using weldments; mechanical fasteners with seals, gaskets, or mastics; mesh and mastic sealing systems; or tapes. Tapes and mastics must be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 181A or UL 181B. 11. Mechanical fasteners and seals, mastics, or gaskets must be used when connecting ducts to fans and other air distribution equipment, including multiple -zone terminal units. 12. Operation and maintenance documentation must be provided to the owner that includes at least the following infornation:a) equipment capacity (input and output) and required maintenance actionsb) equipment operation and maintenance manualsc) HVAC system control maintenance and calibration information, including wiring diagrams, schematics, and control sequence descriptions; desired or field - determined set points must be permanently recorded on control drawings, at control devices, or, for digital control systems, in programming commentsd) complete narrative of how each system is intended to operate. 13. Each supply air outlet or diffuser and each zone terminal device (such as VAV or mixing box) must have its own balancing device. Acceptable balancing devices include adjustable dampers located within the ductwork, terminal devices, and supply air diffusers. I Envelope Compliance Test Results Protect Summary Information Name: American Family_Entertainment A JJ_o Joe R,...ti. @.........J �w"t AwvivJJ. fvv City / Rarburo, Idaho 8344() Climate Location: Idaho Fails, Idaho Standard EnvStd climate data is used for compliance Fkxw Area (k2): 40 Window Area (ft2k 941 Window Wall Ratio: 0.03 Gross Roof Area (ft2): 40669 Skyiighi roof Rauo: 0.0 �V..tl..til d.aa 1471• RRQA Door Area fft2): 0 American Family_Entertainment UOO D D. Compliance Summary — PASSES 16904 0.151 n.a. 0.0 O.Q Masonry Units, Partial Grout -No Framing- i EPF Proposed Standard Marain - - -� Roo ft 283° 4613 1775 S.".1ghtg Wall 558 696 138 Below -Grade Walls 0 03 -668 Floors 0 Slabs e 0 0 navlinhting Pntgntia! 9 9 0 T otal 12387 13633 1246 1 s lsw Defined -Wait, Above Grada-Mass -Cone. 16904 0.151 n.a. 0.0 O.Q Masonry Units, Partial Grout -No Framing- i exposed block (User Defined) C -2 User Defined -Wall, Above Grade -Mass -gone. i i 375 0.05 i n.a. 0.0 O.v ` Masonry Units, Partial Grout -No Frami.irg- Insulated Vo�_blxk (User Defined) _e- C-3 User Defined-Roof-Insulation Entirely Above 40189 0.039 n.a. 0.0 0.0 Deck or Mass -roof (User Defined) I Total 684668 reneauauon *crocule Code Description __ Area U- factor SHiGC SC Tvis G -2 Window - Operable -Ail Frame Types, Single- Tinted - 941 1.25 0.7 0.80 0.58 Window Single glazing G -3 Skylight-Plastic, With Curti- Wood/Vnyl- Tinted- 480 0,84 0.37 0.43 0.25 Skylight Double glazing- a�.,rylic/polycarbonate Total 1421 Space Category: building FloorArea (ft2): 40 Gross Wall Area (1`12): 29220 Window Area (ft2): 941 Window Wall Ratio: 0.03 Gross Roof Area (ft2): 40669 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.01 Skylight Area (ft2): 480 Door Area (ft2): 0 Surfaces Name Type Const. Code Area Orient Notes ASHRAE11ESNA Standard 90.1 .2001 07/30103 M Envelope Compliance Teat Results American_Fami ly_Entertainment north wall Wall C-1 3584 North n.a. north Wall C-2 3504 North n,a. east wall Wall C -f 4368 North Me. east wail Wail C -2 2840 North n.a. soUh_wall Wall C -1 5135 North n.a. south west_wall Wall Wall C-2 C-1 2956 North n.a. Openings Window G-2 3817 North n.e. west wall Wall C-2 3016 North n.a. roof I Roof C -3 40669 nla n.a. Total 69889 O enin Name T a Const. Code Area Orient. Notes window _glass Window G -2 63 North n.e. Openings Window 0-2 196 North n.a. Openings Window G-2 98 North n.a, Openings Window G-2 472 North n.a. i Openings Window G-2 112 North n.s. skylights Skylight G-3 480 n/a n.a. Total 1421 ASHRAEAESNA Standard 90A -2001 07/30103 Permit Number Mechanical Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date 2000 IECC COMcheck - EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2c Data filename: Z:\Projects\2003\Action Mechanical \0337 Teton River Village \comcheck.cck Section l: Project Information Project Name: Designer /Contractor: Document Author: Notes: Teton River Village Ken Harris Dee J Rammell Mechanical Only Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): Rexburg, Idaho Climate Zone: 16 Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 8693 Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 143 Project Description (check one): _ New Construction _ Addition _ Alteration _ Unconditioned Shell (File Affidavit) Section 3: Mechanical Systems List uanti System Type & Description 1 HVAC System 11: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =65 - <90 kBtu/h, Air- Cooled Condenser / Single Zone I HVAC System 8: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =90 - <135 kBtu/h, Air- Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 10: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air- Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 7: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 9: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 6: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 5: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =90 - <135 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 4: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 3: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity > =65 - <90 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 1 HVAC System 2: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone t HVAC System 1: Heating: Duct Furnace, Gas / Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Air - Cooled Condenser / Single Zone Section 4: Requirements Checklist Bldg. Dept. Use Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 11 [ ) 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 8 [ ) 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements [ ] 3. Integrated air economizer is included Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 10 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity ( ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 7 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 9 [ ] 1. Equipment minim efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 6 [ ] 1. Equipment minim efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 5 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements [ ] 3. Integrated air economizer is included Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 4 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 3 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 2 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 1 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity [ ] 2. Newly purchased cooling equipment meets the cooling efficiency requirements Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable [ ] 1. Load calculations per 1997 ASHRAE Fundamentals [ ] 2. Plant equipment and system capacity no greater than needed to meet loads Exception: Standby equipment automatically off when primary system is operating - Exception: Multiple units controlled to sequence operation as a function of load [ ] 3. Minimum one temperature control device per system [ ] 4. Minimum one humidity control device per installed humidification/dehumidification system [ J 5. Thermostatic controls has 5 deg. F deadband - Exception: Thermostats requiring manual changeover between heating and cooling [ ] 6. Automatic Controls: Setback to 55 deg. F (heat) and 85 deg. F (cool); 7 -day clock, 2 -hour occupant override, 10 -hour backup - Exception: Continuously operating zones - Exception: 2 kW demand or less, submit calculations [ J 7. Automatic shut -off dampers on exhaust systems and supply systems with airflow >3,000 cfin [ J 8. Outside -air source for ventilation; system capable of reducing OSA to required minimum [ J 9. R -5 supply and return air duct insulation in unconditioned spaces R -8 supply and return air duct insulation outside the building R -8 insulation between ducts and the building exterior when ducts are part of a building assembly - Exception: Ducts located within equipment - Exception: Ducts with interior and exterior temperature difference not exceeding 15 deg. F. [ ] 10. Ducts sealed - longitudinal seams on rigid ducts; transverse seams on all ducts; UL 181A or 181B tapes and mastics [ ] 11. Mechanical fasteners and sealants used to connect ducts and air distribution equipment [ ] 12. Operation and maintenance manual provided to building owner [ ] 13. Balancing devices provided in accordance with IMC 603.15 Section 5: Compliance Statement The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 2000 IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck -EZ Version 2.4 Release 2c and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. W / LC." c +', 11, d DJnhXa'A Principal Mechanical Designer -Name Mechanical Requirements Description 2000 IECC COMcheck -EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2c Data filename: Z:\Projects\2003\Action Mechanical \0337 Teton River Village \comcheck.cck The following list provides more detailed description of the requirements in Section 4 of the Mechancal Compliance Certificate. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 11 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 8 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. 3. An integrated air economizer is required for individual cooling systems over 90 kBtu/h or 3,000 cfin in the selected climate. An integrated economizer allows simultaneous operation of outdoor -air and mechanical cooling. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 10 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency. Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 7 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 9 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 6 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 5 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. 3. An integrated air economizer is required for individual cooling systems over 90 kBtu/h or 3,000 cfm in the selected climate. An integrated economizer allows simultaneous operation of outdoor -air and mechanical cooling. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 4 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 3 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 2 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 1 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Duct Furnace (Gas): 78% Et @ Maximum Capacity, 75% Et @ Minimum Capacity 2. The specified cooling equipment is covered by Federal minimum efficiency requirements. New equipment of this type can be assumed to meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code requirements for equipment efficiency. Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable 1. Design heating and cooling loads for the building must be determined using procedures equivalent to those in Chapters 27 and 28 of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals or an approved equivalent calculation procedure. 2. All equipment and systems must be sized to be no greater than needed to meet calculated loads. A single piece of equipment providing both heating and cooling must satisfy this provision for one function with the capacity for the other function as small as possible, within available equipment options. - Exception: The equipment and/or system capacity may be greater than calculated loads for standby purposes. Standby equipment must be automatically controlled to be off when the primary equipment and/or system is operating. - Exception: Multiple units of the same equipment type whose combined capacities exceed the calculated load are allowed if they are provided with controls to sequence operation of the units as the load increases or decreases. 3. Each heating or cooling system serving a single zone must have its own temperature control device. 4. Each humidification system must have its own humidity control device. 5. Thermostats controlling both heating and cooling must be capable of maintaining a 5 degree F deadband (a range of temperature where no heating or cooling is provided). - Exception: Deadband capability is not required if the thermostat does not have automatic changeover capability between heating and cooling. 6. The system or zone control must be a programmable thermostat or other automatic control meeting the following criteria:a) capable of setting back temperature to 55 degree F during heating and setting up to 85 degree F during coolingb) capable of automatically setting back or shutting down systems during unoccupied hours using 7 different day schedulesc) have an accessible 2 -hour occupant overrided) have a battery back -up capable of maintaining programmed settings for at least 10 hours without power. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on thermostats that control systems serving areas that operate continuously. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on systems with total energy demand of 2 kW (6,826 Btu/h) or less. 7. Outdoor -air supply systems with design airflow rates >3,000 cfin of outdoor air and all exhaust systems must have dampers that are automatically closed while the equipment is not operating. 8. The system must supply outside ventilation air as required by Chapter 4 of the International Mechanical Code. If the ventilation system is designed to supply outdoor -air quantities exceeding minimum required levels, the system must be capable of reducing outdoor -air flow to the minimum required levels. 9. Air ducts must be insulated to the following levels:a) Supply and return air ducts for conditioned air located in unconditioned spaces (spaces neither heated nor cooled) must be insulated with a minimum of R -5. Unconditioned spaces include attics, crawl spaces, unheated basements, and unheated garages.b) Supply and return air ducts and plenums must be insulated to a minimum of R -8 when located outside the building.c) When ducts are located within exterior components (e.g., floors or roofs), minimum R -8 insulation is required only between the duct and the building exterior. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required on ducts located within equipment. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required when the design temperature difference between the interior and exterior of the duct or plenum does not exceed 15 degree F. 10. All joints, longitudinal and transverse seams, and connections in ductwork must be securely sealed using weldments; mechanical fasteners with seals, gaskets, or mastics; mesh and mastic sealing systems; or tapes. Tapes and mastics must be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 181A or UL 18113. 11. Mechanical fasteners and seals, mastics, or gaskets must be used when connecting ducts to fans and other air distribution equipment, including multiple -zone terminal units. 12. Operation and maintenance documentation must be provided to the owner that includes at least the following information:a) equipment capacity (input and output) and required maintenance actionsb) equipment operation and maintenance manualsc) HVAC system control maintenance and calibration information, including wiring diagrams, schematics, and control sequence descriptions; desired or field - determined set points must be permanently recorded on control drawings, at control devices, or, for digital control systems, in programming commentsd) complete narrative of how each system is intended to operate. 13. Each supply air outlet or diffuser and each zone terminal device (such as VAV or mixing box) must have its own balancing device. Acceptable balancing devices include adjustable dampers located within the ductwork, terminal devices, and supply air diffusers.