The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAPPLICATION, BP, MULT DOCS - 04-00247 - Schwendiman, Sutton, Simmons Partnership - RemodelCITY OF REXBURG BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED TO: NAME: Sss Partnership PERMIT #: 04 00247 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF: Com Remodel JOB ADDRESS: 39 Professional Pla St GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Terry Leishman Const This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in Building Code and Zoning Regulations of the City of Rexbug. It is specifically understood that this Permit does not allow any Variance to the regulations of the City of Rexburg or Zoning Codes unless specifically approved by the City Council and explained on the Building Permit Application as approved by the Building Inspector. Date Approved Issued By Building Inspector THIS PERMIT MUST BE PROMINANTLY DISPLAYED AT THE BUILDING SITE THE BUILDING MAY NOT BE OCCUPIED OR USED WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING ACERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1) A complete set of approved drawings along with the permit must be kept No work shall be done on any part of on the premises during construction. the building beyond the point indicated O T I C E 2) The permit will become null and void in the event of any deviation from the in each successive inspection without 4. Framing accepted drawings. approval. No structural framework of 3) No foundation, structural, electrical, nor plumbing work shall be concealed any underground work shall be covered without approval. INSPECTION CARD BUILDING Date Approved 1. Layout 2. Footing 3. Foundation 4. Framing 5. Insulation 6. Drywall 7. Sidewalk 8. Final 9. Mechanical OTHER Date roved 1. Fire Department Fina PLUMBING Date Approved 1. Sewer Service Conn 2. Water Service Conn( 3. Rough -In 4. Ground Rough -in 5. Final For Inspections Call 359 -3020 ext. 341 24 Hour Notice ACERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CAN NOT BE ISSUED PRIOR TO FINAL ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING INSPECTION APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF REXBURG, IDAHO Date of Application 7 _ Z — d OWNER Name Site Address Mailing Address l �F�S.siGSC�.¢G I City /State/Zip Telephone/Fax/Mobile Name L, Mailing Address City /State/Zip Telephone/Fax/Mobile �Jo PROJECT INFORMATION DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Property Zone: Is existing use compatible with zoning, (screening parking, etc) When was this building last occupied ? Architect/ Engineer Firm Z � Plan Name e6 �,fr/ S'• �. S Subdivision Lot Block Circle One Residential ommer Educational Government Remodel Other S7 <2- Circle One New House Addition/Remodel to House w Commercial Com mer ' emodel Circle One Basement:( Finished / Unfinished Other: None/ Patio/ Carport/ Awning N/A Lot Square Footage Lot Width Main Level Square Feet Upstairs Square Feet Basement Square Feet Garage Square Feet Number of Stories Height of Building What will structure be used for: Home Home Business Apartment <Co erci Other ,g - Will there be an apartment? iC a If so, how many units - Total Estimated Building V elm /ir you in a flood plain Signature of Applicant Code Zone Building Type Commercial Building Plumbing bid Commercial Building HVAC bid Commercial Building Square footage (Parks, Fire, and Police) Building Permit Fees Plan Check Fees Plumbing Permit Fees Digging Permit Fees Water & Sewer Fees Front Footage Fee Impact Fees TOTAL S Permit No. b y - O C) � yT Signature of Inspector Issued by A. Professional Plaza; common area designation — City Attorney Zollinger reviewed some background for this issue. Some of the confusion that has existed over the years has come from the inconsistency in which the City has applied the Zoning Ordinance to this area. The City Council asked to have Staff provide a possible solution to the inconsistencies. A 25 foot setback on both sides of the street would create a very strange street. The road would be 8 feet 2 inches wide at the Peterson property on the north end of the street if the proper set backs were imposed. The Engineering Department recommended that the entire area be designated as a City Street with multiple non compliance properties. City Attorney Zollinger recommended separating the area into two different classifications. Mayor Larsen thanked the Sparhawks for bringing this issue to the City for resolution. He asked the Council to move forward with equal treatment of the properties. He recognized the efforts of the Sparhawks and recognized the different applications for this property. It did not meet the street requirements when it was created. The Council discussed having a fence to buffer the residential properties. A redwood fence was installed to buffer Ron Bird, who is adjacent to the Professional Plaza. The possible solution given by John Millar was discussed as shown below: "Action Proposed: Designation of the area as a street, parking lot or a roadway." Staff Analysis: Professional Plaza Setback Date 4/7/2004 4/7/2004 Foundation Drip Line 1 _ . Rexburg Properties 4' 2' 2 SSS Partnership 7' -2.5" 6' -10" 3 SSS Partnershi 7' -2.5" 6' -10" 4 North West Real Pro erties 7' 4' - 8 " 5 Strobel Dirk 10' 8' -3" 6 Archibald D. Gary 7' - 1 " 5' -7.5" 7 Smith Douglas 26' -7" 24' -8" 81 ITEETH 7' -6.5" 5' -7" 9 . 1 . Tar ghee Medical Plaza 164" 5' -1" The area does not meet the street definition in the Ordinance. It is too narrow. John Millar provided a Possible Solution: "It is acknowledged that Professional Plaza is a Street and is to be signed as such. It is also acknowledged that the above setback deviations exist, that no additional deviations will be allowed in the future and that setback requirements for future structures will not allow the use of setback averaging." Council Member Benfield reviewed the street signs for the area. A Harvard Avenue sign is located on the north end of the Professional Plaza and the interior addresses for the buildings have a Professional Plaza address. Council Member Pugmire reviewed the problems of having nine non conforming use properties in the Professional Plaza verses one non conforming use property. City Attorney Zollinger explained that if the City designated the area as a parking lot, the south portion of the Plaza would have between 36 feet to 39 feet of area for a City parking lot; the north part where Doctor Peterson's office is located would be a non conforming site. The Council discussed on the non conforming use designation of the properties over time. Council Member Pugmire asked about John Millar's solution. The Ordinance would have to be precluded in this case and list the properties in the Plaza as non conforming to the Ordinance. The Council discussed the setbacks for the buildings and the roadway. Council Member Pugmire moved that the City property between Main Street and First South in the Professional Plaza be designated as a City Street called "Professional Plaza Street" with the current list of buildings be designated as nonconforming uses if they do not comply with the setbacks to the street in the Ordinance; and have those buildings entered into the record as "non conforming use "; and that no future nonconforming uses be allowed in the Professional Plaza; and that the set back averaging not be allowed from Main Street to First South on the "Professional Plaza Street ". Council Member Fullmer seconded the motion; Discussion: the setback will be 25 feet by Ordinance 725, as amended. Council Member Fullmer asked how the nonconforming uses will affect tracking the nonconforming properties. Dr. Heiner's property is not in this subdivision and would not be listed as a nonconforming property. Val Christensen mentioned that this information can be tied to the parcel on the new property tracking software. Dr. Archibald was concerned about having his property listed as non conforming. All voted aye, none opposed. The motion carried. Council Member Pugmire thanked the Sparhawks for their efforts and the packet they put together on the issue. • 16 0 Vc,,e 41J,7T& A xoe- Ir 1 42-381 50 SHEETS 5 SQUARE AWW 4 2.382 " 0 SHEETS 5 SQUARE NQL d2 - 200 SHEETS 5 SQUARE • 7 I 0