The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAPPLICATION, CO, MULT DOCS - 04-00224 - Big O TiresA" "qb CITY OF .r � REXBLIR� 7gBt1sNE�+� AMERICAS FAMILY COMMUNITY Building Permit No: Applicable Edition of Code: Site Address: Use and Occupancy: Type of Construction: Design Occupant Load: Sprinkler System Required: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Rexburg Department of Community Development 19 E. Main St. / Rexburg, ID. 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 / Fax (208) 359 -3022 0400224 International Building Code :2000 710 N 2nd E Big O Tires Commercial Bldg No Name and Address of Owner: Bruce & Laura Burton Contractor: Special Conditions: Occupancy: 710N 2nd E Rexburg, Id 83440 Mid Valley Const. Inc This Certificate, issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 of the International Building Code, certifies that, at the time time of issuance, this building or that portion of the building that vies inspected on the date listed vies found to be in compliance Wth the requirements of the code for the group and division of occupancy and the use for vhich the proposed occupancy v►es classified. Date C.O. Issued: November 23, 2004 (03:18PM) C.O Issued by: Building Official There shall be no further change in the eAsting occupancy classification of the building nor shall any structural changes, modifications or additions be made to the building or any portion thereof until the Building Official has reviewed and approved said future changes. I Water Department: Fire De t: State of Idaho Electrical Department (208 - 356- 4830): - ' __ • • • BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION RExBURG iu s 2, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED DATE D NO. OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER 1 \�/� F Q/� P JOB ADDRESS BUILDER /UI ( C) U C. L — O ��S � ARCHITECT C PHONE 303 — e-1 - 7 , 1— STRUCTURE: NEyy cf l A DESIGNER —,{Z / X S f ❑ REMODEL ❑ ADDITION ❑ REPAIR ❑ RESIDENCE ITOMM. ❑ EDUCATIONAL ❑GOVT ❑RENEWAL L3 FIRE DAMAGE ❑ RELIGIOUS ❑ FENCE ❑ PATIO ❑ CARPORT ❑GARAGE ❑AWNING FOOTINGS FOUNDATION BASEMENT FLOORS EXT. WALLS INT WALLS C'�CONCRETE C�YCONCRETE CEILING ROOF uFeT ❑ MASONRY ❑PARTIAL Li VVWU ❑ MASONRY ❑ FULL RtONCRETE ❑ WOOD ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER C`I o ❑ OTHER O MASONRY ❑CONCRETE ❑ VENEER ❑ METAL ❑WOOD QrAASONRY ❑ WOOD WDRYWALL ❑ BUILT UP. ❑ WOOD CCH�AS "ALLS ❑ CONCRETE ❑ PLASTER SH. ❑ COMP. SH. Ct bIL ❑ COAL L&CEILING 31)RYWALL ❑ PLASTER ❑TILE ❑TILE ❑��IREPLACE (3 FLOORS QWERIMETER ❑ ACOUSTIC C] ROLL ROOF UdELECTRIC - • ❑TILE UTOPEN ❑ ETAL This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Uniform Building Code and Zoning Regulations of burg, and it is hereby agreed that the work to be done as shown in the plans and specifications will be completed in accordance with the regulations pertaining and applicable thereto: The issuance of the permit does not waive restrictive covenants. REMARKS: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & ZONING VALUE FEE PAID ❑ CASH BUILDING CHECK APPLICANT INSPECTOR DATE ADDRESS "M i t —iwner's Copy CANARY —Building Department's Copy PINK — Assessor's Copy GOLDENROD - Inspector CITY OF REXBURG APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING PERMIT OWNER Name T- 6,:� " Address _ Z Tel. ",i3- -17 Lot Blk. Add. ji PLUMBER Name L�E 15 02�' �L ✓M ��,J t/r 6 Addres &PU 170/ Tel. ddb --230 Zo2,, MATURE OF INSTALLATION Use M Rough Plumbing Septic Tank Fixtures Water Piping Complete Sewer I DESCRIPTION OF WORK Bath Tubs Urinal Showers Sink Trap Laundry Trays Water Heater I Wash Basin 7— Other Toilet 2. Slop Sinks Kitchen Sinks Floor Drain I S Drinking Fountains Lawn Sprinklers Water Softeners Dish Washing Mach. Clothes Washer FEES Plumbing Permit .................... $ Sewer Inspection .................... $ Inspection of Pipe ................... $ Inspection of Fixtures ................ $ TOTAL $ Received: Date By INSPECTOR'S RECORD N w n Rough Plumbing Sewer Other Finish Plumbing INSP. NAME E SUBCONTRACTOR LIST Excavation & Earthwork: MID VALLEY CONSTRUCTION (541).881-1608 MID VALLEY CONSTRU Concrete: CURB & GUTTER - REINHART & SONS (208) 522 -6324 FGUNPATieN B-PEb 4AYERc & SONS —( 209) —256 9209 Masonry: TMC MASONRY, INC. (208) 331 -8200 Roofing: REED RADFORD ROOFING (208) 538 -6176 Insulation: GALE INSULATION ( 208) 529' -2336 Drywall MVC (541) 881 -1608 Painting: SHAWN BOURASA PAINTING (541) 889 -6419 Floor Coverings: N/A Electrical SNAKE. RIVER ELECTRICAL ( 208) 785-0140 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (Manufacturer or Supplier) Roof Trusses: GOr.DEN EMPIRE MANUFACTURING Floor/ Ceiling ,foists: GOLDEN EMPIRE MANUFACTURING ( 435) 723 -5000 Cabinets: Siding /Exterior Trim: Other: WESTERN WHOLESALE SUPPLY (208) 522 -0288 Plumbing: LEWIS CORPORATION PLUMBING & HEATING (208) 238 -1202 Heating: LEWIS CORPORATION PLUMBING & HEATING (208) 238 -1202 Electrical SNAKE. RIVER ELECTRICAL ( 208) 785-0140 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (Manufacturer or Supplier) Roof Trusses: GOr.DEN EMPIRE MANUFACTURING Floor/ Ceiling ,foists: GOLDEN EMPIRE MANUFACTURING ( 435) 723 -5000 Cabinets: Siding /Exterior Trim: Other: WESTERN WHOLESALE SUPPLY (208) 522 -0288 Sub - Contractor List Big O Tire 710 North Rexburg, ID 83440 1. Lewis Corporation Plumbing and Heating 208 - 238 -1202 2. Snake River Electrical 208 - 785 -0140 3. Reed Radford Roofing 208 - 538 -6176 4. Shawn Bourasa Painting 541- 889 -6419 5. Overhead Door Company 208 - 234 -4780 7. Reinhart & Sons Inc. (Curb and Gutter) 208 -522 -6324 10. TMC Masonry Inc. (CMU) 208 -331 -8200 11. Mid Valley Construction Inc. (General Contractor) 541- 881 -1608 and Concrete Contractor. 12. Mid Valley Construction Inc. (Steel Erection) 541- 881 -1608 13. Zollinger Construction Inc. (Site grade, Paving) 208 - 356 -5516 14. Mid Valley Construction Inc. (Excavation and Concrete prep.) 541- 881 -1608 15. Edelmayer & Sons, Inc. (Foundation) 208- 356 -9220 16. Ard's Glass & Paint 208 - 356 -4631 Oregon License # 124559 /Oregon Septic and Sewage License # 38229 Page 1 of 1 JaNell Hanson From: John Millar Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:52 PM To: JaNell Hansen Subject: RE: Joe's Filling Station Big O Tires was only charged this much because the business that was there before them had already paid the connection fees. They are using less water than the previous building. All is okay. Joe's Filling Station should have paid water and sewer connection fees. Could you please research weather they are on the system accounts? Please let me know..John M. From: JaNell Hansen Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 3:59 PM To: John Millar Subject: Joe's Filling Station Hi John, I am turning in the outstanding impact fees to Blair so he can collect on them. I have a question about the water and sewer hookup fees for Big O Tires and Joe's Filling Station. Joe's Filling Station wasn't charged any hookup fees. Do you know why there wouldn't have been a hookup fee charged? Should I go ahead and charge him the hookup fees? Also, Big O Tires was charged $514 for sewer front footage and $514 for water front footage but no hookup fees. Do I need to charge them for a hookup fee or was that included? I know you will be busy coming back from your trip so whenever you have a minute to call or come over would be fine. Thanks! JaNell 4/24/2006 • • OF 1tERB (��, fo : :J 0 CITY OF REX American Family Community July 25, 2006 In regards to: Building Permit Impact Fees Big O Tires # 04 -00224 Laura Burton Big O Tires 710 North 2nd East Rexburg, ID 83440 Dear Laura Burton: In response to your letter dated May 23, 2006, we have reviewed this matter and determined to write off the amounts in total of $ 1,617.89 that were not calculated correctly at the time of the initial bill. We apologize for any inconvenience this situation may have caused you and hope that this solution will be satisfactory. Sincerely, Shawn Larsen Mayor Ls Ov Shawn D. Larsen Mayor 12 N. Center Rexburg, ID 83440 P. O. Box 280 mayor@rexburg.org www.rexburg.org Phone (208) 359.3020 ext.328 Fax (208) 359.3022 May 23, 2006 JaNell Hansen Building Safety Coordinator City of Rexburg 19 E. Main P.O. Box 280 Rexburg, fD 83440 Re: Building Permit Impact Fees Big O Tires #04 -00224 Dear JaNell: BIY TIRES ® CENTER RVICE 710 North 2nd East Rexburg, 1D 83440 (208) 356 -8999 FAX (208) 356 5588 In response to your letter suggesting we owe money for fees that were not calculated when we applied for a building permit, I find it very unfair and unconscionable to think that we should pay more when we relied on that number you gave us. It is unbelievable that you would come back two years later and ask for mPre,money. In any business a customer is billed and in turn pays for services or goods. They leave the business knowing they will not be approached to pay more money because of a computer or employee mistake. Unfortunately, if there is a mistake, the business or entity accepts the responsibility of the error. It is the same with the government. I paid in good faith what the city said was payment in full at the time of getting the building permit. At this late date, I do not think I should pay more. Sincerely, aura ' urt Owner ALIGNMENTS • BRAKES • SHOCKS • STRUTS • MAJOR BRAND TIRES • CUSTOM WHEELS f R4 �tl URn • REXBURG City of Rexbur - 1 - - -- Department of Community Development Arne•rlrns Fnn,ily Cnnnnuniry 19 E Main St. / Rexburg, ID. 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 / Fax (208) 359 -3022 PERMIT APPLICATION INVOICE Invoice Date07 /06/2006 d r i r mE� is Applicant: BIG O TIRES Site Address: 710 N 2ND E 710 N 2ND E REXBURG, ID 83440 Rexburg, ID 83440 The following fee amounts for this permit application are unpaid at this time: U6i41h II O -. (6 0 9 a a. — a fir al� {{�� INII - r !gillhPii r iiI �t �ii Y -. �a �y �'� ti§. � ,- Building Permit Fee 2832211 $ 0.00 Commercial Plumbing Permit Fee 2832214 $ 630.00 Fire Impact 2035500 $ 203.87 Plan Check Fee 2832320 $ 314.98 Police Impact Fee 0735500 $ 469.04 Sewer Front Footage 3534742 $ 0.00 Water Front Footage 3434642 $ 0.00 Total: $1,617.89 Page 1 of 1 D,q 6 U Z`Zq BIG -O TIRES DRAINAGE REPORT Submitted to: CITY OF REXBURG DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Prepared for: JRW & ASSOCIATES Forsgren Associates, Inc. 350 North 2 " East Rexburg, ID 83440 May 2004 ss�oN L T ERE 03� 'yl 'ATE OE F (HUSK) 5 / 10L( YA1f 11 w CITY OF RIXBURG BIG -O TIRES DRAINAGE REPORT Submitted to: CITY OF REXBURG DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Prepared for: N JRW & ASSOCIATES r, TE 9500 0 B (HUSK) Forsgren Associates, Inc. 5 'z coq 350 North 2 nd East Rexburg, ID 83440 May 2004 1 7 INTRODUCTION The runoff and drainage calculations in this report pertain to the storm drainage design for the Big-0 Tires site located on the north side of Rexburg bounded on the west by 2 nd North and on the south by East 1000 North. The total acreage approximately 1.04 acres (45,296 square feet) Refer to Sheet SD -2 Site Layout in the plan set prepared by JRW & Associates. The City of Rexburg requires on site detention for this property with an allowance to release the detained storm water to the Rexburg storm drain system over a forty-eight hour period. The design storm for detention is the 50 -year 24 -hour event. Applying the design storm to the project area yields a runoff volume of approximately 6,749 cubic feet. DESIGN METHODS Determine Rainfall Dept The design storm required by the City of Rexburg for use in sizing stormwater detention features is the 50 -year, 24 -hour storm. The NOAA Atlas shows a total rainfall depth of 2.3 inches corresponding with the 50 -year 24 -hour design storm. Figure 1 is the NOAA Atlas map for the State of Idaho precipitation depths corresponding to the design storm. Determine Runoff Not all the water that descends as precipitation results in runoff. The ground slope, cover, vegetation, soil type, rainfall intensity and other abstractions affect the percentage of precipitation that does not percolate into the soil. Various hydrologic methods are used to determine runoff, each of which accounts for those abstractions in various ways. The method selected for this analysis is the Rational Method. The Rational Method uses a runoff coefficient "C" that predicts the fraction of water that falls on a particular surface and results in runoff. K :'ItjR •I.I]G- t }`I.)RAIN A(7i' RL',I)OR I.I)O(' Page 2 k t 4 y E .. IDAHO q-M I r W r l " uawwuawn zr+a nECa�.mY (y% } .yam. - MrtN11KtlW xM 1y y`Pfl (� N w JI �.�5 e: � � .... r ldpm �. J ) k.A �yy � ,�-.��1� ,y�•�A� if f a E ` `x Rexburc 2`3 aC�� "• � w e'er t . i f - 7` . • y S�t l - _ 1 4 Figure A l s, 54 Page 2 1 �I 1 Big-O Tire Drainage Report In the Rational Method, development projects typically utilize a coefficient for three general types of surface; rooftop, pavement including sidewalks, and landscaping, which for our case is assumed to be grass. Runoff coefficients were selected for those three surface types on this project, and the corresponding areas for each land surface type was determined based on the final Site Plan configuration as presented on Sheet SD -2 of the drawing set. The volume of runoff is determined by multiplying the land area for each land surface type by the precipitation volume and the runoff coefficient according to the following formula: V = CIA where: • V = volume of runoff (ft) • C = runoff coefficient • I = rainfall depth for design storm (ft) • A = total area of the development (ft The attached table presents data collected along with the calculations that predict a total storage volume of 6,749 cubic feet. The storage volume may be reduced by releasing storm water concurrent with the design storm event. Assuming a release rate of 0.04 cfs /acre during the storm event, the required storage volume is 3,477 cubic feet. Page 3 LOOMM K:i7RL�:I3IC.i- f?`•t:)tZ�ItiAt;[ REPORTDOC 1 CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF DETENTION BASIN Job: BIG -0 TIRES Job No: Date: Sheet 1 01-04-XXXX 12-May-04 Of Basin Location: 1000 North 2nd East Comp. By: Checked: REXBURG IDAHO Husk Crowther C CA Roof Areas .ft. 5,744 0.92 5284.5 Paved Areas .ft. 31,962 0.90 28766 Landscaped Areas .ft. 7,590 0.20 1518 Totals 45,296 N/A 35568 W eighted C (CA/Area) 0.79 Total Acres 1.04 acres Allowable Release Rate (cfs /acre) 0.00 cfs /acre Divide storm runoff volume by 48 hours and acreage Maximum Release Rate (cfs) 0.00 cfs Maximum Release Rate (cfm) 0.00 cfm Estimated Pond Surface Area 7 ,230 s . ft. 50 feet x 55 feet ( ( ( ( (5) ( (8) ( (1)X(2) Maximum (4)X(5) Pond Pond Int. Precip. Area Comp. CA112 Accum Sto Int. Release Rate Accum Rel Refjjd Stt Surf Area Depth min.) (in. ) (s .ft.) C cu.ft.An.) cu.ft.) (min.) cu.ft. /min) (cu.ft.) C y ((s q. ft.) (ft.) 60 0.00 45,296 0.79 2,964 0 60 0.0 0 `', 7,230 0.0 120 0.02 45,296 0.79 2,964 68 120 0.0 0 7,230 0.0 180 0.05 45,296 0.79 2,964 155 180 0.0 0 ftem0m 7,230 0.0 240 0.10 45,296 0.79 2,964 307 240 0.0 0 Ste. 7,230 0.0 300 0.16 45,296 0.79 2,964 466 300 0.0 0 ' 7,230 0.1 360 0.22 45,296 0.79 2,964 648 360 0.0 0 x4, 7,230 0.1 420 0.29 45,296 0.79 2,964 855 420 0.0 0 7,230 0.1 480 0.39 45,296 0.79 2,964 1,159 480 0.0 0 7,230 0.2 540 0.50 45,296 0.79 2,964 1,477 540 0.0 0 ,} , 7,230 0.2 600 0.66 45,296 0.79 2,964 1,963 600 0.0 0,� 7,230 0.3 660 0.86 45,296 0.79 2,964 2,5611 660 0.0 0 Q : , ; 7,230 0.4 720 1.21 45,296 0.79 2,964 3,579 720 0.0 0 7,230 0.5 780 1.54 45,296 0.79 2,964 4,568 780 0.0 0 �(3 7,230 0.6 840 1.68 45,296 0.79 2,964 4,977 840 0.0 0 7,230 0.7 900 1.78 45,296 0.79 2,964 5,263 900 0.0 0 7,230 0.7 960 1.871 45,296 0.79 2,9641 5,529 960 0.0 0 ?1 7,230 0.8 1,020 1.93 45,296 0.79 2,964 5,729 1,020 0.0 0 7,230 0.8 1,080 2.00 45,296 0.79 2,964 5,931 1,080 0.0 0 5,93; 7,230 0.8 1,140 2.06 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,118 1,140 0.0 0 %,,1y,;,,' 7,230 0.8 1,200 2.12 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,292 1,200 0.0 0 r" 6 °292' 7,230 0.9 1,260 2.17 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,429 1,260 0.0 0 < ;42 7,230 0.9 1,320 2.21 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,558 1,320 0.0 0 ;6,55(3' 7,230 0.9 1,380 2.25 45,296 0.79 2,964 - 2,9641 6,662 1,380 0.0 0 6;662; 7,230 0.9 1,440 2.28 45,296 0.79 6,7491 1,440 0.0 0 4`` ::.%749' 7,230 0.9 REQUIRED DETENTION STORAGE 6,749 cu. ft. fl 1 Of owa e e ease Rate (cfs /acre) 0.04 cfs /acre Divide storm runoff volume by 48 hours and acreage Maximum R 1 R ' e ease ate (cfs) Maximum Release Rate (cfm) Estimated Pond Surface Area 0.04 cfs 2.35 cfm 7.230 s . ft. ' ' (1) ( CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF DETENTION BASIN ( Job: BIG -0 TIRES ( (4)X(5) Job No: 1 01-04-XXXX Date: Area Comp. CA112 Accum Sto Int. 12-May-04 Accum Rel. Basin Location: 1000 North 2nd East REXBURG IDAHO Comp. By: Husk Crowther (s .ft.) C (cu.ft.An.) C (min.) CA ( cu.ft.) Roof Areas .ft. 5,744 0.92 5284.5 Paved Areas .ft. 31,962 0.90 28766 Landscaped Areas .ft. 7,590 0.20 1518 Totals 45,296 N/A 45,296 35568 2,964 68 120 Weighted C (CA/Area) 0.79 282 Total Acres 1.04 acres 0.05 45,296 0.79 2,964 All b1 R 1 180 2.3 422 Of owa e e ease Rate (cfs /acre) 0.04 cfs /acre Divide storm runoff volume by 48 hours and acreage Maximum R 1 R ' e ease ate (cfs) Maximum Release Rate (cfm) Estimated Pond Surface Area 0.04 cfs 2.35 cfm 7.230 s . ft. 50 feet x 55 feet ' (1) ( (3) (1)X(2) ( (5) Maximum ( (4)X(5) Int. Precip. Area Comp. CA112 Accum Sto Int. Release Rate Accum Rel. in.) (s .ft.) C (cu.ft.An.) (cu.ft.) (min.) (cu.ft. /min) ( cu.ft.) 60 0.00 45,296 0.79 2,964 0 60 2.3 141 ' 120 0.02 45,296 0.79 2,964 68 120 2.3 282 180 0.05 45,296 0.79 2,964 155 180 2.3 422 240 0.10 45,296 0.79 2,964 307 240 2.3 563 300 0.16 45,296 0.79 2,964 466 300 2.3 704 360 0.221 45,296 0.79 2,964 648 360 2.3 845 420 0.291 45,296 0.79 2,964 855 420 2.3 985 480 0.391 45,296 0.79 2,964 1,159 480 2.3 1,126 ' 540 0.50 45,296 0.79 2,964 1,477 540 2.3 1,267 600 0.66 45,296 0.791 2,964 1,963 600 2.3 1,408 660 0.86 45,296 0.791 2,964 2,561 660 2.3 1,548 ' 720 780 1.21 1.54 45,296 45,296 0.79 0.79 2,964 2,964 3,579 4,568 720 780 2.3 2.3 1,689 1,830 840 1.68 45,296 0.79 2,964 4,977 840 2.3 1,971 900 1.781 45,296 0.79 2,964 5,263 900 2.3 2,111 ' 960 1,020 1.87 1.93 45,296 45,296 0.79 0.79 2,964 2,964 5,529 5,729 960 1,0201 2.3 2,252 2.3 2,393 1,080 2.00 45,296 0.79 2,964 5,931 1,080 2.3 2,534 1,140 2.06 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,118 1,140 2.3 2,674 ' 1,200 2.12 45,296 0.791 2,964 6,292 1,200 2.3 2,815 1,260 2.17 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,429 1,260 2.3 2,956 1,320 2.21 45,296 0.79 2,964 6.55811 ,320 2.3 3,097 1,380 2.25 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,6621 1,380 2.3 3,237 ' 1,440 2.28 45,296 0.79 2,964 6,7491 1,4401 231 3,378 REQUIRED DETENTION STORAGE 3,477 cu. ft. Pond Pond Surf. Area I Depth ( s q. ft.) (ft.) 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.( 7,230 0.0 7,230 0.0 7,230 0.1 7,230 0.1 7,230 0.2 7,230 0.4 7,230 0.4 7,230 0.4 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 7,230 0.5 644 oo '2'� � 0 July 7, 2004 ASSOCIATES City of Rexburg Building Department PO Box 280 Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Attn: Val Christenson Re: Big O Tire Store Val, Please find attached: 1. Response to the Plan Review 2. Revised COM -check and rigid insulation R -value information Please call if any additional information is required to acquire a building permit. Thank ou, Gary Richardson 1152 Bond Avenue Qualifications Certified By: RMURG, IDAHO (208) 359 -2309 N.C.A.R.B. Fax 359 - 2271 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURAL REGISTRATION BOARDS ARCHITECTURAL - ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Jun,24. 2004 9:23PM ��jj C M � ii ' AMCRlr- A% AMNY03N% "YJIV Review Action No .4169 P. 2 RO Box 280 19 E. Win 8L Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phonik (208) 359.3020 Fax (208) 359-3022 June 24, 2004 Permit Number. 04 00224 Project Name: Big 0 Tires Project T ype; Commercial New Review Item Building Cade Fire Compliance Review Meet minimum requiremnets according to the International Fire Code. Depending on elevation of sewer end water, instal! according to chapter 7 of the Uniform Plumbing Code. Meets minimum requirements.. Water and Sewer Service Q54� Plumbing Potable Water Review Actions R:equ.kA for Approval Qy ed Plumbing Storm Drain Review Meets minimum requirements_ Accessibility Review Accessible parking needs to be moved to the front of the store closest to the accessible entrance. An accessible route to the right of way must be provided without using driveway. Exiting Review Exiting reviewed and found to be ok. 2 exit signs have symbols but no identification. Structural Review Height and Area Review Building 'type Compliance Mechanical Review e5k� Interior Environment Height and area reviews have been complied with. Building type is II B Mechanical seismic restraints need to shown and calculated with details. The interior environment has been reviewed and found ok Energy Conservation Compliance Review Complies with approved Site Plan Review Plumbing Sewer Drain Review Energy is in compliance Site plan reviewed and is OK per John Millar Meets minimum requirements. 06/24/2004 06/2412004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 06/24/2004 Jun.24. 2004 9:23PM Crnr OF REXBURG AWP,CG+ rAW Y COMMWY Review Action No. 4169 P. 3 P.0 Box 280 99 F- Main St Rexburg, Idaho 83440 FMna (208) 358 -3020 Fax(208)359.3022 June 24, 2004 Permit Number: 04 00224 Project Name: Big Q Tires Project Type: Commercial New Review Item Actions Req uira0. fQ Approval Approved oved Parcel Vs IZPRXBCA0176480 Jun.24. 2004 9:23PM �pp F CFrY r • 9 EXB U I G -RICA5 VW,r COMMUNRY Reviow Action No, 4169 P- 4 P.0 Box 280 19 E Main St Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone (208) 359 -3020 Fox(208)359 -3022 June 24, 2004 Permit Number: 04 00224 Project Name: Big 0 Tires Project Type: Commercial New Review Item ,_.....__ _ ACfi — n Required fa Ap pxgva.L fix ed., Requimd Rre Flow REQUIRED FIRE FLOW SH ALL BE 1500 05/18/2004 P IfWO HOURS Water Supply HYDRANT WITHIN 500 FEET., 06/18/2004 Fire Access Roads ACCESS ROADS TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR 0611812004 TO CONSTRUCTION. Fire Extinguishers FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TO BE INSTALLED 06/1812004 WITHIN TRAVEL DISTANCES THROUGHOUT OCCUPANCY. Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems NOT REQUIRED WITH SIZE AND 06/18/2004 CONFIGURATION OF RACK STORAGE FOR TIRES„ Standpipes NOT REQUIRED. 06/18/2004 Commercial Cooking NOT APPLICABLE., 06/1812004 Alarm Systems NOT REQUIRED., 06/1812004 Other Comments A LOCK BOX IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS 06/1812004 OCCUPANCY BUT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED_ PLEASE CONTACT THE FiRE DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION. Parcel Vs RPRXBCA0176480 JRW & ASSOCIATES 1152 BOND AVENUE REXBURG, IDAHO 83440 (208) 359 -2309 PHONE (208) 359 -2271 FAX BIG O TIRE STORE - REXBURG, ID ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Building Department: Fire Code Compliance Building shall meet minimum requirements of IFC Accessibility Accessible parking shall be moved to front of building and a depressed walk at access isle will be provided. Fire Department: Water Supply Two (2) fire hydrants are within 500 feet of building Access Roads Are existing Fire Extinguishers Are identified on Drawing A -1, note 12 & 13 Other Comments Owner shall be advised of the Lock Box recommendation. JUL -08 -2004 12:23PM FROM- ENGINEERED SYSTEMS - ESA July 8, 2004 JRW & Associates Mr. Gary Richardson 1152 Bond Avenue Rexburg, Idaho 83410 Ite: Big -O -Tires Rexburg. Dear Gary, 315 W. CENTER, POCATELLO. IDAHO 83204 TELEPHONE - 208 -233 -0501 FAX - 208 - 233 -0529 D. SUDWEEKS, P.E. R. RICE, P.E. In response to the City of Rexburg's comments, I offer the following: 1. Water and Sewer Service - Will be installed as per Chapter 7 of the Uniform Plumbing Code. 2. Mechanical Review - Mechanical Sisemic Restraint will be designed and installed as required by the International Building Code. 3. Required Fire Flow - We will have existing fire hydrants flow rested to determine available flow. Feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ENGINEERED SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. A. kl 208 - 233 -0529 T -819 P.001 /001 F-473 EmeineereJ S y stems Associates., 11me. MECHANICAL - ELECTRICAL - ENGINEERING r - MEMBER ACEC . r ' 1 JR W & A SSO CIA TES 1152 BOND AVENUE REXBURG, IDAHO 83440 (208) 359 -2309 Fax: (208) 359 -2271 e -mail. irwa@a,cableone.net FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: June 24, 2004 To: Val Christenson Of City of Rexburg, Building Department Fax: Re: Big O Tires Sender. GR YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 6 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 208 -359 -2309. Val, Please find attached the revised Com -check and the rigid insulation R -value information as per your request. The General Contractor shall be directed to revise Note 1 Drawing A -4 to read "Single ply roofing membrane on (2) layers of 3 rigid insulation ". This assembly will achieve an R -value of 37. Thank you, Gary Richardson Please call if you have any questions. Multi -Max FA - U Insulation for use with all types of Roofing Membranes MANUFACTURER Rmax, Inc. 13524 Welch Road; Dallas, Texas 75244 Phone - 972- 387 -4500 (TX) 800 - 527 -0890 (Central) 800 - 845 -4455 (Eastern) 800 - 762 -9462 (Western) Email: rmax@rmaxinc.com Web Site: www.rmax(Mrmaxine.com rte, PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Rmax Multi- Max°FA -3 is a rigid, foam .plastic, thermal insulation board composed of polyisocyanurate foam bonded to glass fiber /organic mat facers on each side. Multi- Max -3 utilizes a new and environmentally friendly HCFC free blowing agent. This roofing insulation is suitable for use in insulated roofing system constructions utilizing built -up roof, modified bitumen or single-ply membranes and metal panel roofing systems. Mult Max -3 is approved for use in new roofing constructions and limited retrofit/recover roofing constructions over steel, wood, non - combustible and certain types of natlable roof decks. Multi- MaxeFA -3 is available in standard four (4) foot wide panels. Standard panel lengths are four (4) and eight (8) feet. Contact Rmax Sates for availability. See "Thermal Properties" for standard thicknesses and thermal resistance values of Multi - Max 0 FA -3. Multi- Max -3 is shipped in bundles that are approximately 48 inches high and wrapped In plastic for easy handling. Note: Ail Rmax products must be tarped, placed on skids, and kept dry before and throughout construction. TECHNICAL DATA TYPICAL P HYSICAL PROPERTIES: ,11ya rroperues mown are based on data obtained under Controlled conditions and are subled to normal manufacturing k*warms. =Flame Spread and Snake oeveloped Indw as are used to nummrs and describe the properties of this material In response to heat and *tare under controlled laboratory conditions and should not be used to describe or appraiss the fire hazard or fire risk of this rnsterial and other related r*Nng corrrponents under actual fire conditions. APPLICABLE STANDARDS Multi- Max -3 is manufactured to conform to the physical property requirements of ASTM C1289, Type 11. Factory Mutual - Class 1 roofing insulation (Minimum Thickness = 1.5 ") per FM Standard 4450. Multi- Max -3 is subject to the conditions of approval as a roof insulation when installed as described In the current edition of the FMRC "Approval Guide." Underwriters Laboratories - UL listed and labeled: Class A for External Flame - UL Standard 790 Class A for Internal Flame - UL Standard 1256 Fire Rated Roof /Ceiling Assemblies -UL Standard 263. Design Nos. P225, P230, P259, P510, P701, P717, P719, P727, P728, P601, P815, P819 Use of Multi- Max•FA -3 over steel or non - combustible decks without a thermal barrier meets the requirements of the "Foamed Plastic" section of Chapter 26 of the following major model building codes: National Building Code (BOCA); Standard Building Code (SBCCI); Uniform Building Code .Building APPLICATION / INSTALLATION Roof Applications - Multi- Max°FA -3 is applied to the roof deck in order to provide a layer of thermal insulation and a suitable substrate for the application of the many different kinds of roofing membranes available in the market today. Multi- MaksFA -3 must be secured to steel or wood decks with FM listed mechanical screw and plate fasteners. Multi- Max -3 may be secured to other types of "nailabie" decks with suitable mechanical fasteners for that type of "nailabie" deck. Multi - MaxeFA -3 may be secured to a concrete deck with suitable rechanical screw and plate fasteners as an alternate method of attachment. Refer to "General Notes for Use and Installation of Rmax Roofing Insulations." Multi- MaxmFA -3 may be adhered to properly prepared concrete roof decks with hot bitumens or air -cured polyurethane foam adhesives. NOTE: Panel size shalt be limited to 4'x 4 Refer to ".General Notes for Use and Installation of Rmax Roofing Insulations" (TR0101A) for specifics regarding installations of Rmax roofing insulation products. Built -Up Roof Systems - Specify and Install Multi - Max"FA-3 for use with BUR membrane systems. Secure the Multi- Max•FA -3 to flat, smooth, dry roof decks with FM approved mechanical fasteners using one (1) fastener every four (4) square feet of insulation surface. Multi- Max°FA -3 may be adhered to properly prepared concrete deck surfaces in solid flood coats of hot bitumens. Do not allow the mopping bitumen to exceed 450 °F nor go below 400 0 F. Rmax recommends that when Multi- MaxeFA -3 Is used under a 8UR membrane system, It be protected by an overlay of mineral fiberboard, wood fiberboard, perlite or a venting base sheet as speed in the NRCA 'Technical Bulletin #9". Modified Bitumen Systems - Specify and install Multi- Max -; for use with a modified bitumen roofing systerh. Note: Rmax requires a suitable overlay of mineral fiberboard, wood fiberboard or perlite be applied to the insulation prior to application of a torch -down modified bitumen system. Rmax recommends that insulations used under hot - mopped modified bitumen membranes be protected by an overlay of mineral fiberboard, wood fiberboard, perlite or a venting base sheet as specified In the NRCA "Technical Bulletin #9 ". 0'd 6691r -SSG -1300 uiJooa uosigom -a sewoyl WUO2 :9 X000 1 � 0 unr Multi- Max ® FA -3 - Roofn 072201MMFA -3 - 2 Insulation shall be attached to the steel decks with one (1) mechanical fastener per four (4) square feet where the Multi - MaxcFA -3 will be overlaid with a rigid layer of perlite or wood fiberboard mopped in solid moppings of a hot bitumen. Where appropriate and suitable, Multi - MaxeFA -3 may be adhered to properly prepared concrete roof deck surfaces in solid flood coats of hot bitumens. Do not allow the mopping bitumen to exceed 450 °F nor go below 400 °F. Fully- Adhered Single -ply Systems - Specify and install Multi - MaxcFA -3 under fully- adhered single-ply membranes diagram PVC, I document a ment when usingFM mechanical screw and plate fasteners for attachment of the Multi - Max to steel or wood decks. Where appropriate and suitable, Multi- Max®FA -3 may be adhered to properly prepared concrete roof deck bitumens. surfacpp he membra hot epps in solid flood coats of o below 400 oZo bitumen ne 450 no go manufacturer's recommended instructions for the type of adhesive, the application rate, and proper application method for adhering the membrane to Rmax's Multi - Max Mechanically Attached Single -ply Systems - Specify and install Mutti- Max ® FA -3 for use under all types of mechanically attached single -ply membrane systems. Attach the Multi- Max®FA -3 to the roof deck with a minimum of four (4) FM approved mechanical fasteners per four foot by eight foot (4' x 8 sheet of insulation. Additional fasteners in the insulation may be required by the membrane supplier. Apply the mechanically attached membrane according to membrane supplier's Specifications. Loose -Laid Ballasted Single -ply Systems - Specify and install Multi - MaxeFA -3 when installing a loose -laid ballasted single -ply system. Multi- MaxeFA -3 is laid into position on the roof deck without fastening or otherwise securing the Insulation. The membrane and ballast are then -installed according to the membrane supplier's specifications. Ballast, placed at the specified rate, restrains the entire roof system. THERMAL PROPERTIES I PRODUCT DATA NR" means raeia -.., a *_ Metal Panel Roofing Systems - Multi - MaxeFA -3 may be used as the roof insulation under metal panel roof systems. Secure the Multi- MaxeFA -3 to the deck with one (1) mechanical fastener per four (4), square feet of insulation prior to attachment of the metal panel system. Attachment of the securing brackets and /or devices must be with screws of sufficient length to penetrate the insulation and engage the roofing deck and/or roof structure below - by a minimum of one inch. Bearing plates and other details of construction shall be applied per the metal roofing panel manufacturer. Designers and installers of Rmax roofing products p are referred to Rmax publication "TR0101A" General Notes for Use and Installation of Rmax Roofing Insulations." AVAILABILITY Rmax Multi- Max -3 is manufactured in all Rmax plants and is available through an extensive distribution network. Contact Rmax Sales for product availability and /or nearest distributor. WARRANTY See "Sales Policy" for warranty conditions. Rmax does not assume any responsibility or liability for the performance of any products other than those manufactured by Rmax. Requests for Certification Letters, special warranty con- siderations and/or UL labels must be submitted to Rmax Sales prior to delivery of the products. WARNING: DO NOT leave Multi- MaxaFA -3 exposed in constructions, Polyisocyanurate .foam is an organic material, which will bum when exposed to an Ignition source of sufficient heat and intensity and may contribute to flames spreading. LIMITATIONS - Multi- MaeFA -3 is not a structural panel. Multi- Max -3 is not recommended nor warranted for use in inverted or protected roofing membrane systems (IRMA). -- - •- • LTTR= r.-- trau R -vane me greater the insulating over, bundle el le 4'x8" PaFlute Nominal Long Term Places S Ft Span Thickness' Thermal Resistance 1.5 9.0 32 1024 3 3/8" 1.6 9.6 30 980 3 3/8" 1.8 10.9 26 832 3 3/8" 10 1 12.1 24 768 33/8, 2.1 12.8 22 704 33/8• 2.3 14.0 20 640 3 3/8' 2.5 15.3 19 608 3 518" 2.6 15.9 18 576 3 5 8" 2.7 16.6 17 544 - 36/8' TO . 18.5 16 512 3 518" 3.3 20.4 14 448 3 5/8` 3-5 21.7 13 416 35/8` 4.0 25.D 12 384 3 US The t.3" and thicker produels erne d id FM ra:. �_an - ,:..... w 'Lang-Term Thermal Realstwea ILTTR) values are determined In axordanoa %Wth CANAKC -5770. LTTR predicts a J"asr, tine- waiphlad avers, E - d E69b- SBL -1B 00 U 1400 uosigoN -Q sewo4l WUDZ =B IlrDDZ j unr •_ FASTENING DIAGRAMS .'� RODARg�j� � � Membrane MON RM F Mlnlmum Thickness 511 4s" 12" 24" C7 —U N I 0 N C4 0 —Q it 24• 0 0 O O I ANY wanerea Fully Adhered Mecharkally Single Fly StZ Fly Fastened S.P.M. 2" 1.5" 1.5'• 24" 12" 3"V. 12" 24" 12" 0 0 000.0 0 0 N N 0+C) N 0000 • � It I ra I N Oo N I I ! 0 0 0000 N 0 O N CAUTION: U Paltern Not ■wee itoll-VA dndioa of MIA Approved For Use VA Plastic plain 84e fir Membrane 12 12" 2" - Maul Plates only i o O 000 O f- 4 1b Males on Fastening Pa�bems: O O 0 0 00=' 1. Aft Rated For FM Ull W*rm 190 XC Corporate & Seim Office Rmax, Inc. 13524 Welch Road, Dallas, Texas 75244 -6291 (972) 387 - 4500 • (800) 527-0890 (Central) (800) 762 -8462 (Western) . (800) 846-4465 (Eastern) Email: rmax @rmaxine.com . Web Site: http:i/Www.nnaxinc.com Plant Locations Dallas, Texas • Greer, South Carolina a Femley, Nevada TR1202 -B (02/03) {' - Cl Printed in the USA E69101-98G -1302 uiUooa uostgo8 -a sewoyl Wd22 :8 ip002 fra unC 07220IMMFA -3 - 3 05/20/04 THU 11:36 FAX 801 298 1132 TANNER SMfTH BARFUSS & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS T # 42 North Mal Street nrlTUl, uTah x Pho ne 801)) 298 - 45793 �7q*� IR Fax �9q1) 296 -1132 E — mail tsbo0oroa.nat M d& O JRW MTE IOGSfd+ — ENGINEER PILE Q 002 of 05/20/04 THU 11:36 FAX 801 298 1192 [a 003 T S S E 4 44 JRW STANDARD LOAD TABLE / LONGSPAN STEEL JOISTS, LH SERIES Based on a Maximum Allowable Tensile Stress of 30 ksi JOM Approx. WL In par Depih in SAFE LOAD' in lbs, f , CLEAR SPAN IM FEET Oaslgnallan LlnearFL Inches oetw n 1lff� (Joisl Only) 28 -32 33 1 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 4LH03 11 24 11500 342 339 336 323 307 293 279 267 255 244 234 224 215 207 199 191 235 226 218 204 188 175 162 152 141 132 124 116 109 102 96 90 2 LH04 12 24 14100 419 398 379 360 343 327 312 298 285 273 262 251 241 231 222 214 280 265 246 227 210 195 192 169 158 148 138 130 122 114 107 101 24LH05 13 24 15100 449 446 440 419 399 380 363 347 331 317 304 291 200 269 258 240 308 297 285 244 226 210 196 182 171 160 150 141 132 124 117 24LH06 16 24 20300 604 579 555 5t 1504 480 457 437 417 399 381 364 348 334 320 307 411 302 3561 331 F 306 284 263 245 228 211 197 184 /172 161 152 142 24LH07 17 24 22300 665 638 613 N ie 565 541 516 491 468 446 426 407 389 373 357 343 462 421 393 367 343 320 297 276 257 239 223 208 195 182 171 161 24L.H08 18 24 23600 707 677 649 622 597 572 545 520 497 475 455 435 417 400 384 359 480 447 416 386 362 330 314 292 272 254 238 222 208 196 184 173 241-1-109 21 24 28000 832 000 785 764 731 696 663 632 602 $74 548 524 501 460 460 441 562 530 501 460 424 393 363 337 313 292 272 254 238 223 209 196 241-H10 23 24 29600 882 856 832 809 788 768 737 702 668 637 608 582 556 533 511 490 $98 559 528 500 474 439 406 378 351 328 304 285 266 249 234 220 24LH11 25 24 31200 927 900 875 851 829 007 787 768 734 701 671 642 616 590 567 544 624 SIM 1 555 5251 498 472 449 418 388 361 337 315 1 294 276 1 259 243 1 3340 41 42 1 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 28LH05 13 28 14000 337 323 910 207 286 275 265 255 245 237 228 220 213 206 199 193 219 'W5 192 180 169 159 150 142 133 126 '119 113 107 102 97 92 281-1-106 16 26 18600 448 429 412 395 379 364 350 337 324 313 301 291 281 271 •262 253 289 270 253 238 223 209 197 186 175 166 156 148 140 133 126 120 28LH07 17 28 21000 505 484 464 445 427 410 394 379 365 352 339 327 316 305 295 285 328 305 205 267 251 236 222 209 197 186 176 166 158 150 142 135 28LH08 18 28 22500 540 517 496 475 456 438 420 403 387 371 357 344 331 319 308 297 348 325 305 2135 268 252 236 222 209 196 185 175 165 156 148 140 28LH09 21 28 27700 667 639 612 586 563 540 519 499 481 463 446 430 415 401 3B7 374 428 400 375 351 329 309 291 274 258 243 228 216 204 193 183 173 2OLHIO 23 28 $0300 729 704 679 651 625 600 576 554 533 513 495 477 460 444 429 415 466 439 414 388 364 342 322 303 205 269 255 241 220 215 204 193 28LH11 25 28 32500 780 762 736 711 682 655 629 605 562 561 540 521 502 465 488 453 498 475 446 423 397 373 351 331 312 294 279 263 249 236 223 212 28LH12 27 28 35700 857 837 818 800 782 766 737 709 682 656 632' 609 587 566 546 527 545 520 496 476 454 435 408 383 361 340 321 303 285 270 256 243 28LH13 30 28 37200 B95 874 654 035 816 799 782 756 751 722 694 668 643 620 596 577 568 543 518 495 472 4S2 433 415 398 373 1 352 332 1 314 297 281 266 47 -08 49 W50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 1 59 60 61 62 63 64 32LHO6 14 32 16700 16700 336 326 315, 304 294 284 275 $66 257 249 242 234 227 220 214 206 211 199 189 17'9 189 161 153 145 138' 131 125 119 114 108 104 99 32LH07 16 32 18800 18800 379 366 353 341 329 318 306 296 205 279 271 262 254 247 240 233 235 223 211 200 189 179 170 162 154 146 140 133 127 121 116 111 32LH08 17 32 20400 20400 411 397 303 369 357 345 333 322 312 302 293 264 275 267 258 2522 255 229 216 205 194 104 175 187 159 151 144 137 131 125 120 32LH09 21 32 25600 25600 516 498 480 463 447 432 418 404 391 379 367 356 345 335 325 315 319 302 285 270 256 243 230 219 206 198 189 180 172 164 157 149 32LH10 21 32 26300 28300 571 531 512 495 478 462 445 430 416 402 389 376 364 353 342 352 332 315 297 282 267 254 240 '228 217 206 196 186 178 169 162 32LH11 24 32 31000 31000 625 602 580 560 541 522 505 488 473 458 443 429 416 403 390 378 3B5 363 343• 325 308 282 277 263 251 239 227 216 206 196 187 179 32LH12 27 32 313400 38400 734 712 688 664 641 619 59B 576 559 541 524 508 492 477 463 449 450 428 406 384 364 345 327 311 295 281 267 255 243 232 221 211 32LH13 30 32 40600 40600 817 001 785 771 742 715 690 666 643 621 600 561 562 544 527 511 500 480 461 444 420 397 376 354 336 319 304 288 275 262 249 238 32LH14 33 32 41800 41800 843 826 810 795 780 766 736 713 668 665 643 622 602 583 564 547 515 495 476 458 440 417 3% 374 355 337 321 304 290 276 264 251 32LH15 35 32 43200 43200 870 853 837 821 805 791 776 763 750 725 701 678 656 635 616 597 532 1 511 4921 4731 454 4381 422 4071 393 1 374 3551 3313 1 322 306 L 292 1 279 42-06 4756 57 58 59 60 1 61 62 63 64 65 1 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 36LHO7 16 36 16800 16800 292 283 .•274 266 258 251 244 237 230 224 218 212 207 201 196 191 177 - .168 1W 153 146 140 134 128 122 117 112 107 103 99 95 91 36LHO8 18 36 18500,10500 321 311 302, 293 264 276 266 260 253 246 239 233 227 221 215 209 194- 185 178 160 160 153 146 140 134 128 123 118 113 109 104 100 36LH09 21 36 23700 23700 411' '390' 386'.374 363 352 342 333 323 314 308 297 289 282 275 267 247•'_235 •224 214 204 185 185 179 171 163 157 150 144 138 133 127 36LH10 21 36 26100 26100 454 440 426 413 401 389 378 367 357 34T 339 328 320 311 303 295 273 260 248 236 225 215 206 197 188 180 173 165 159 152 146 140 36LH11 23 36 20500 28500 495 400 465 451 438 425 412 401 389 378 368 358 348 339 330 322 297 283 269 257 246 2% 224 214 205 196 188 180 173 166 159 153 96L,H12 25 36 34100 34100 593 575 557 540 523 508 493 478 464 450 437 424 412 400 389 378 354 338 322 307 292 279 267 255 243 232 222 213 204 185 187 179 36LH13 3p 36 40100 40100 697 675 654 634 615 596 579 562 546 531 516 502 480 475 463 451 415 395 376 359 342 327 312 298 285 273 262 251 240 231 222 213 36LH14 36 36 44200 44200 768 755 729 706 683 661 641 621 602 584 567 551 535 520 505 492 456 434 412 392 373 356 339 323 309 295 283 270 259 247 237 228 36LH15 36 36 46600 48600 809 795 781 769 744 721 69B 677 656 637 618 600 583 567 551 536 480 1 464 448 4341 4131 394 1 375 350 1 3421 3271 3121 299 1 2861 274 263 252 45 IN 05/20/04 THU 11:37 FAX 801 298 1132 T S S E TSBA Simplified Wind Design Wind Design Loads for the Main Wind Force Resisting System Roof Angle = 2.0 degrees Importance Factor (1) = 1 (ASCE 7 Table 6.1) Alt. ASD Load Combination = 1.3 (1.3 for Alt., otherwise 1.0) X = 1 1 Lesser of No Less than Edge Strip (a) = 5.1 5.1 8 2.04 3 End Zone (2a) = 10.2 JRW IBC 2003 (section 1609.6) Note: Check 1609.6.1 for limitation E +rr� b Simplified Method OK Eave Ht 20 Eave Height= 20 ft Wall L 128 Mean Roof Height= 20.0 ft Least horizontal Dimension= 61 ft Basic Wind Speed mp ' 3 second gust speed Mean Roof Ht 20 ridge Exposure = Wall L 51 Hurricanine Prone Region ? N Adjusted Main Windforce- Restisting System Loads (psf) Load Direction Horizontal Loads Vertical Loads lzndZone ntenor on nd Zone Interior Zone Overhang A B j;D E F G N EoH GoH Load Case 1 Load Case 2 20.7 -10.7 0,0 0.0 0.0 -24.8 -14.0 0.0 0.0 -17.3 -10.9 0.0 0.0 -34.7 -27.2 0.0 0.0 IV) Transverse FIGURE; 1609.6.2.1 MAIM VANI)FORCE LOADING DIAGRAM DLB 3/2!2004 Longitudinal Ew Zw Q 004 Wind IBC2003 Simplified.xis 05/20/04 THU 11:38 FAX 801 298 1132 TSBA T S S E Simplified Wind Design /I " &0 Ae(I-6 .1, Zone Area Pressure 1 10 7.3 20 6.9 17.5 50 6. 1 6.9 100 5.8 -16.5 2 10 7.3 -30.2 20 6.9 -27 50 6.3 -22.7 100 5.8 -19.5 3 10 7.3 -45.4 20 6.9 -37.6 50 6.3 -27, 3 100 5.8 -19.5 4 10 18 -19.5 20 17.2 -18.7 50 16.1 -17.6 100 15.3 -16.8• 500 13.4 -14.9 5 10 18 -24.1 20 17.2 -22.5 50 16.1 -20.3 100 15.3 -18.7 500 13.4 -14.9 DLB 3!2/2004 �w �w 444 JRW k Gable Roof (7° < 0:5 45 °) End Zones . Comer Zones RO* W%-zaw3 Wind IBC2003 Simplified.xls 191 005 Flat Roof Gable Roof (0< 7 Interior Zones F4* ZM Hip Roof (7° < 0< 27 °) 05/20/04 THU 11:39 FAX 801 298 1132 TSBA 1 STORY LATERAL BOX Designed by: Donald Barfuss 08 -26 -03 Generic Factors (Allowable Stress) Information Wa112 Wa11Wt2 Plant 1�� 11`-all"142 I)iaptkWt2 V Fp t)utPlane Anchorage Pressure2 moo ` �.b JRW PROJECT: Big O Tire - Rexburg ID / LOCATION: Left Cantilever Walls It Parapet Shared Flt' Length Gable It Wt Lip 18.0 it 2.0 ft 0.0 ft 32.0 ft 0.0 ft 60 ps f Dow n ; 18.0 ft 2.0 ft 0.0 ft 32.0 ft 0.0 ft 60 psf Left 18.0 ft 2.0 ft 0.0 ft 36.0 ft 0.0 ft 60 psf Right 18.0 ft 2.0 ft 0.0 ft 0.0 ft 0.0 ft 60 psf Intermediate Walls. Direction fft Length Wt Total Wt U-D 11.0 ft 0.0 ft 60 psf L -R 11.0 ft 0.0 ft 60 psf Diaphragm Direction Total L Chord L Ratio Wt. U-D 36.0 ft 35.0 ft 35.0000 L -R 32.0 ft 1.0 ft Lateral Factors DiaphragmM 38 psf V or E11.4 0.0680 Fp 0.0680 Out of Rane 0.1900' Anch and Pressure 18 psf Up ... , a Down I r 1.0 ft, 32.0 ft /--- 0.0 ft int. walls It to U-D dir 35.0 ft 36.0 ft 0.0 ft int. walls 11 to L -R dir. Wall := Wa112•ft WallWt := Wal1Wt2•psf Plan := Plan2•ft Iwall := Iwa112•fl Iwallwt := Iwallwt2•psf DiaphWt := DiaphWt2•psf Pressure := Pressure2•psf T S S E 1 of 4 rani, DLB 3/29/2004 1 Story Box 08 -26 -03 Factors Left Cantilever.mcd 05/20/04 THU 11:39 FAX 801 298 1132 T S S E JRW 16 007 TSBA V = 0.068 Fp = 0.068 Seismic Calculations: Wt Calc: Iz�all�� 1 'Itrallr�t r � 2 2 of 4 60 60 WallWt = 60 psf 60 ( Iwallwt } = 60 J I psf 60 OutPlane = 0.19 Anchorage = 0.379 Plan = 36 35) ft (32 1 DiaphWt= 38 psf Pressure = 18 psf Iwal1 O 'IN� - all 1 , 1 , IWAIN �t imp lew := 2 iwwtew = 0.0 k iwwtns = 0.0 k WWt := DiaphWt•P1an 0 -Plan l 0 + iwwtns + iwwtew i:= 0,1..3 TribHT abo� e := it Wall ` =Walli o, Wall I ,if Wall > wall . 2 i (i, wall i 0 — Will. Wall TribHTbe low := it wall i 2 < Will i ), 2 , z Wal1Wt. WWt 43.8k Wall . 2 — Wall , fi , wall i. l Wall Wt. = i 1820320 , WallWt 60 18 2 0 32 0 Wall = WaWt := TribHTabovei•Walli, 3• Wall — Wt Wall — Wt = 60 psf $ 18 2 0 36 0 18 2 0 0 0 11 0 Iwall = ) ft K9 3.84 11 0 2 ft TribHTbelow = 9 V = 0.068 Fp = 0.068 Seismic Calculations: Wt Calc: Iz�all�� 1 'Itrallr�t r � 2 2 of 4 60 60 WallWt = 60 psf 60 ( Iwallwt } = 60 J I psf 60 OutPlane = 0.19 Anchorage = 0.379 Plan = 36 35) ft (32 1 DiaphWt= 38 psf Pressure = 18 psf Iwal1 O 'IN� - all 1 , 1 , IWAIN �t imp lew := 2 iwwtew = 0.0 k iwwtns = 0.0 k WWt := DiaphWt•P1an 0 -Plan l 0 + iwwtns + iwwtew i:= 0,1..3 TribHT abo� e := it Wall ` =Walli o, Wall I ,if Wall > wall . 2 i (i, wall i 0 — Will. Wall TribHTbe low := it wall i 2 < Will i ), 2 , z Wal1Wt. WWt 43.8k Wall . 2 — Wall , fi , wall i. l Wall Wt. = i 0, i W all i 2 = Wall 2 , WallWt 60 60 WaWt := TribHTabovei•Walli, 3• Wall — Wt Wall — Wt = 60 psf 60 WbWt := TribHTbelow 3 •Wall Wt. 2 K9 3.84 17.28 TribHTabove = 2 ft TribHTbelow = 9 ft WaWt = 3.84 k WbWt = 17.28 k 2 9 4.32 19.44 2 9 0 0 WWt +1 (WaWt + WbWt + WWt Wt := WWt Wt = 109.776 k BaseShear = V -Wt DaseShear = 7.46k DL8 3/29/2004 1 Story Box 08 -26 -03 Factors Left Cantilever.mcd 05/20/04 THU 11:40 FAX 801 298 1132 T S S E JRW TSBA 3 of 4 Diaphragm Forces: Calculate wpx each direction: wpns := WWt + (WaWt + WbWt + WaWt + WbWt WPM := WWt + (WaWt + Wbwt + WaWt + WbWt Calculate the total force applied in each direction: Fpew := Fp•wpew Diiphragin shear_n :_ FpeIt' 2•Plan wpns = 86k wpew = 67.536 k Av — eat' := FleNt- Plw. Fpns = Fp -wpns Diaphrag.m_shear — e := rpm Serp_115 := Fpn•' 2•Plan�► l Plan l.l Plan l )` (Plan }, Chord - n:_ Nt _perp_ns Chord �cserp_et� ` l $•Plau0,1 8- Plan l,l Compare these values for Diaphragm Shear in the direction stated with the Wind Values for Shear NvSerp s = 5849.1 plf w _perp_exv = 131.2 plf Calculate Wall Shear: Fpns = 5.85k Fpew = 4,59k Diaphragm shear n = 2296plf Diaphragm shear e = 84pif Chord — n = 0.021 k Chord — e = 20.0 92 k Shear-n:= V- r(WWt + WaWt + WaWt + WbWt + WbWt — iwwtew ) •.5 + WaWt + WbWt Shear V•r(WWt + WaWt + WaWt + WbWt + WbWt — iwwtew) -.5 + WaWt + WbWt Shear w := V (WWt + WaWt + WaWt + WbWt + WbWt — iwwtas)•.5 + WaWt + WbWt Shear V•[ WWt + WaWt + WaWt + WbWt + WbWt — iwwtns) -.5 + WaWt + WbWt Calculate Out Wall Forces: OPF := OutPlane• WallWt Calculate Out -of -Plane A nchorage Forces: twawt + wbWt j AF. •= Anchorage ' Wall. 11.4 11.4 OPF = 11.4 psf 11.4 250.1 AF = 250.1 if 250.1 p 0.0 Shear = 3.7 k Shear — s = 3.7 k Shear = 4.5 k 5hear_e = 2.9 k [A 008 DLB 3/29/2004 1 Story Box 08 -26 -03 Factors Left Cantilever.mcd 05/20/04 THU 11:40 FAX 801 298 1132 T S S E JRW Q009 TSBA 4 of 4 Wind: 11 WindHT := TribHTabove + TribHTbelow + Wall, , 4 11 WindHT = 8 11 h := Wall 0 + Wall. l + Wall i 4 11 Windwperp i := WindHT Wind_ns := i Windwperp > Windwperp , Windwperp0•Planl 0, Windwperpl•Planl 0) Pressure= 18 psf Wind_ew := igWindwperp > Windwperp Windwperp2 P1an0 0, Windwperp -Plan O 0 Wind—Di pluagm_Shear_ a := Wiad_ns 2- Plan Pliuil , 0 W_Chord_n := Wind ns 8-Plan 0A W Shear n := Wind ew•.5 Wind Summary: 198 Windwperp = 198 plf 198 198 DI_B Wind _Diapliragni_ Shear _n := Wind_ew 2-Plan plan .1, 0 W Churl e := Wind ew — — — 8•Planl,l W Shear a := Wind ns•.5 Wind ew = 7.13 k Wusd Diaphragin_Shear_n = 3564 plf Wind_nti = 634k Wiud_Diaphragtn Shear _e = 90.5plf W Shear n = S i6 k W Shear_e = 3.17k W Chord n = ().724k W Chord e = 32.076 k 3/29/2004 1 Story Box 08 -26 -03 Factors Left Cantilever.mcd FORS6REN ASSOCIATE'S / Eric- LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL A COMPANY OF ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS PLEASE REPLY TO: ■ REXBURG OFFICE ❑ FARMINGTON OFFICE ❑ EVANSTON OFICE ❑ BOISE OFFICE FORSGREN ASSOCIATES ❑ SALT LAKE OFFICE ❑ WENATCHEE OFFICE ❑ SACRAMENTO OFFICE REXBURG 350 North 2nd East, Rexburg, ID 83040 (208)356.9201 SALT LAKE CITY 370 End 500 South, Ste. 200, Sett Lake City, UT 84111 (801) 364.4785 EVANSTON 849 Front Street, Ste 201, Eversion, WY 82930 (307)789.6735 FARMINGTON 1433 North Highway 89, Sate 110, Farmington, UT 84025 (801)447.4700 BOISE 1444 W ast Bannock, Boise, ID 83702 (208)342.3144 WENATCHEE 112 OMs Station Road, Ste A, Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509)867.1426 SACRAMENTO 3110 Gold Canal Drive, Suite C, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 (916)638.1119 DATE: I I /I Z-/01/ PROJECT NO.: 01 -04 -0041 REFERENCE: Big -O Tire WE ARE ENCLOSING: C OPIES I DESCRIPTION 1 each I Per attached list (see second page) REMARKS: C 4� Z' -, Randall G hnson, P.E. If enclsoures are not as noted, please notify us. Page 2 of 2 List for November 12, 2004 Submittal by Forsaren Associates. Inc Date Item Pa es 8/16/04 Proctor 04 -056 2 8/19/04 Concrete test report 1 8/17/04 Concrete test report 1 Grout Test Report samples G04712, G04713, G04714; 7 and 28 day tests on 9/16/04 9/9/04 and 10/07/04 1 Grout Test Report samples G04729, G04730, G04731; 7 and 28 day tests on 9/25/04 9/18/04 and 10/16/04 1 Mortar Test Report samples M04709, M04710, M04711; 7 and 28 day tests on 9/9/04 9/16/04 and 10/07/04 1 Mortar Test Report samples M04726, M04727, M04728; 7 and 28 day tests on 9/18/04 9/25/04 and 10/16/04 1 CMU Prism Test Report, samples CMU04715 through CMU04719; 7 and 28 day 9/8/04 tests on 9/16/04 and 10/07/04 1 CMU Prism Test Report, samples CMU04732 through CMU04735; 7 and 28 day 9/17/04 tests on 9/24/04 and 10/15/04 1 CMU Prism Test Report, samples CMU04736 through CMU04738; 7 and 28 day 9/17/04 tests on 9/25/04 and 10/16/04 1 9/3/04- 9/23/04 CMU Inspection - Daily Inspection Reports by Bret McGowen, T2M Special Inspector 8 Parking Lot Subgrade Inspection - Daily Inspection Report and Density Test Results 2/25/04 by Bill McNaughton, Forsgren Inspector 2 Parking Lot Asphalt Inspection - Daily Inspection Report and Density Test Results by 3/26/04 Bill McNaughton, Forsgren Inspector g Report Number: 1 F O R S G R E N Project Name: Big O Tire ASSOCIATES / INC. Project Number: 01 -04 -0041 Report to: J.R.W. Copies to: Date Sampled: August 16, 2004 Sample ID# : 04 -056 MATERIALS LABORATORY REPORT Maximum Density Determination SAMPLE DATA Sample Location: From Road Material Source: Siepert Pit MATRRiAi. TFCT neTA Sample Prepared yMoist 0 Dry Hammer Type: Manual: Mechanical: ❑ Test Standard: ASDTM D698 EZ ASTM D1557 ❑ Method: C Layers: 5 Date Tested: August 16, 2004 Tested By: WWM Assumed Point Percent Dry Maximum Optimum % % Passing Sp. Gr. Number Moisture Density Dry Density Moisture 3/4 Screen 2.65 1 6.1 124.7 131.1 lbs /ft ^3 8.5% 64.9% 2 7.4 129.7 ASTM D -4718, Correction Corrected for 3 10.1 128.2 for Oversize Particles 70% Passing only 4 141.4 lbs /ft ^3 1209 Ib / s ft^3 Proctor Curve 150.0 145.0 140.0 a J 135.0 O! 0 130.0 - - - - - - -- 125.0 120.0 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 y = - 1.1243x + 19.107x + 49.96 Moisture Content Reviewed By: William W. Mcrlau on Manager: Materials Labora GAP ources\Materials Lab\Big 0 Tires \[Sipert pit- 698. X[S)Report d 0 A O u7 a SAMPLE DATA Sample Location: Onsite Stockpile Material Source: Siepert Pit Date Sampled: August 16, 2004 Sample I[D# : 04 -056 Sample Prepared: Moist 0 Dry ❑ Hammer Type: Manual: 0 Mechanical: ❑ Test Standard: ASDTM D698 ❑ ASTM D1557 D Method: C Layers: 5 MATERIALS LABORATORY REPORT Maximum Density Determination Date Tested: August 16, 2004 Tested By: WWM MATERIAL TEST DATA Assumed Point Percent Dry Maximum Optimum % % Passing Sp. Gr. Number Moisture Density Dry Density Moisture 3/4 Screen 2.65 1 4.3 129.4 135.1 Ibs /ft ^3 6.8% 64.9% 2 5.7 134.2 ASTM D -4718, Correction Corrected for 3 8.3 132.7 for Oversize Particles 70% Passing only 4 144 4 Ib /f ^ FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. Report Number: 2 Project Name: Big O Tire Project Number: 01-04 -0041 Report to: J.R.W Copies to s t 3 143.0 lbs /ft ^3 150.0 Proctor Curve 145.0 140.0 a J 135.0 w 0 130.0 125.0 120.0 2.00 4.00 6.00' 8.00 10.00 12.00 y = - 0.945x + 12.728x + 92.247 Moisture Content Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager: Materials Laborat K:VRW -0 \700 Consd0006 Comply \01 Soils \[P -04 -056 -1 57M S]Report Reviewing Engineer d 0 A O v, FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. FEST INFORMATION ON FRESH CONCRETE Entrained Air, % : 5.0 Actual Slump: 3.5 Temperature, Air OF: 81 Concrete ° F: 72 Water Added at Job : 0 Time off: 2:00 PM Mixing ; ❑ CENTRAL MWER ED TRUCK MDGER ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER 0 CONTRACTOR C 1. d D 1: Date of Sample : 08/19/04 Copies to: Test Report Concrete Cylinders Placement Location : Foundation stemwa Contractor : Mid Valley Construction Concrete Supplier: Walters Ready Mix Mix No.: 142 Truck Ticket No.: 08053 Time Batched: 1:07 PM Quantity Represented : 29 Cu. Yd. Strength Required : 3000 PSI in 28 da Number of Specimens : 4 ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑� CONTRACTOR El FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER El CONCRETE SUPPLIER El OTHER DISIGNATE Report Number :' 2 Project Number: 01 - 04 - 0041 Proj( Tame: Big O Tire Rep... ced to: JRW Sampled By: T2M, Jeff Weather: Partly cloudy ❑ JOB MWER El CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE ❑ COMMCN CARRIER J ers a vered to Laboratory by ; ❑ FPA ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ ENGINEER Field Storage Location: On site Size of Specimens 6X12 LJ 4X8 LJ 3X6 COMPR CTRF.N!_TU "A T A Tested By: Reviewed By: William W. McNaugh on Manager; Materials Labor ry K:VRW\01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \02 Concrete \[C- 02- 08- 19- 04.x1s]0 - 4 � � Reviewing Engineer ! Age in Days Lab Number Date Received Date Tested Cylinder Size Total Load yA Unit Load (psi) Break hype 7 C 04690 08/20/04 08/26/04 6 x 12 93249 3298 B, 28 C 04691 08/20/04 0'9/16/04 6 x 12 28 C 04692 08/20/04 09/16/04 6 x 12 H C 04693 08/20/04 6 x 12 1 x i 1 x i Tested By: Reviewed By: William W. McNaugh on Manager; Materials Labor ry K:VRW\01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \02 Concrete \[C- 02- 08- 19- 04.x1s]0 - 4 � � Reviewing Engineer ! FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. Report Number: 1 Project Number : 01 -04 -0041 Proje ame : Big O Tire Reported to: JRW Date of Sample: 08/17104 Copies to: Test Report Concrete Cylinders Placement Location : Footings Contractor: Mid Valley Construction Concrete Supplier: Walters Ready Mix Mix No.: 140 Truck Ticket No.: 7911.0 Time Batched : 1:45 PM Quantity Represented : 33 Cu. Yd. Strength Required : 3000 PSI in 28 da Number of Specimens: 4 ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑✓ CONTRACTOR ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE TEST INFORMATION ON FRESH CONCRF.TV Entrained Air, % : 5.0 Actual Slump: 3 Temperature, Air O F: 68 Concrete ° F: 68 Water Added at Job: 0 Time off: 2:45 PM Mixing; ❑ CENTRAL MWER M TRUCK MWER ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER 2 CONTRACTOR Cylinders Delive d t L b Sampled By: T2M Jeff Weather: Partly cloudy ❑ JOB MWER ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE ❑ COMMCN CARRIER re o a oratory by; ❑ FPA ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ ENGINEER Field Storage Location: On site Size of Specimens : 6X12 LJ 4X8 LJ 3X6 COWRRggWF. QTUFivr_TU n AV A Tested By: Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials Laborat KAMA01- 04- 0041Big -O \700 Const \0006 Comply \02 Concrete \[C- 01- 08- 17- 04.x1s]0 r Reviewing Engineer Lab Date D Cylinder Total Unit Break K-2Days N umber Received Tested Size Load Load Type (psi) C 04678 08/18/04 08/24/04 6 x 12 82079 2903 B 28 C 04679 08/18/04 09/14/04 6 x 12 28 C 04680 08/18/04 09/14/04 6 x 12 H C 04681 08/18/04 6 x 12 X x Tested By: Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials Laborat KAMA01- 04- 0041Big -O \700 Const \0006 Comply \02 Concrete \[C- 01- 08- 17- 04.x1s]0 r Reviewing Engineer FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. Report Number: "roject Number: 01 -04 -0041 Project Name: Big O Tire Reported to : JRW Date of Sample : 09/09/04 Copies to: Test Report Grout Samples Placement Location : North wall, 4' to 8' elevation Contractor : Mid Vally Construction, TMC, Concrete Supplier: Walters Weady Mix Mix No.: 42 Truck Ticket No.: 8927.0 Time Batched : 7:58 Quantity Represented : 4 Cu. Yd. Strength Required : 2000 PSI in 28 days. Number of Specemens : 3 ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR El PROJECT ENGINEER CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑OTHER DISIGNATE TEST INFORMATION ON FRESH CONCRETE Entrained Air, % : NA Actual Slump : 8 Sampled By: B. McGowan, T2M Temperature, Air O F: 59.0 Grout ° F: 70 Water Added at Job : 0 Time off : Weather: Cool, Clear Mixing; ❑ CENTRAL MWER Q TRUCK MWER ❑ JOB MWER ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE Cylinders Delivered to Laboratory by ❑ FPA ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ ENGINEER ❑ COMMCN CARRIER Field Storage Location: Interior Slab Size of Specemens : 04X4X8 LJ 3X3X6 COMPRFSv%1VF. CTRF.Nf`_ n A m A Tested By: WWM Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials Labo ry KAMA01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \03 Masonry\[G- 01- 09- 09- 04.x1s]0 Rev wing Engineer b ?2 � Age in Days Lab Number Date Received Date Tested Sample Dimensions Total L Load Unit Load (psi) Break Type 7 G 04712 09/13/04 09/16/04 4.00 x 4.00 x 8.00 35922 2245 B 28 G 04713 09/13/04 10/07/04 3.85 x 4.05 x 8.00 42500 2726 B 28 G 04714 09/13/04 10/07/04 3.90 x 4.00 x 8.00 42850 2747 B x x x x x x Tested By: WWM Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials Labo ry KAMA01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \03 Masonry\[G- 01- 09- 09- 04.x1s]0 Rev wing Engineer FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. )jest Name : Big O Tire Reported to: JRW Date of Sample : 09/18/04 Copies to: Test Report Grout Samples Placement Location : Contractor Concrete Supplier Mix No.: Time Batched : 10' n. of SW Corner of Building. Mid Vally Construction / TMC Walter Ready Mix Truck Ticket No. Strength Required : 2000 PSI in 28 days. Quantity Represented : 5 Cu. Yd. Number of Specemens : 3 ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER Q CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE TEST INFORMATION ON FRESH CONCRETE Temperature, Air OF: 61 Grout ° F: 68 Sampled By: B. McGowen / H.B.Sm Water Added at Job : 2 Time off: 9:55 AM Mixing ; ❑ CENTRAL MDQER ❑ TRUCK MDQER ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: Weather: Cool /Breezy ❑ JOB MMER ❑ FPA BATCHING INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER ❑ CONTRACTOR Q CONCRETE SUPPLIER El OTHER DISIGNATE Cylinders Delivered to Laboratory by ; ❑ FPA ❑ CONTRACT'OR ❑ ENGINEER ❑ COMMCN CARRIER Field Storage Location: Slab on grade Size of Specemens : 0 4X4x8 U 3X3X6 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DATA w Days Age in Lab Number Date Received Date Tested Sample Dimensions Total Load Unit Load (psi) Break Type 7 G 04729 09/10/04 09/25/04 3.90 x14-071x 8.00 40825 2572 B 28 1 G 04730 09/10/04 10/16/04 3.85 x 3.95 x 8.00 45285 2978 B 28 G 04731 09/10/04 10/16/04 3.95 x 3.95 x 8.00 45325 2905 B x x x x x x Tested By: WWM Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials Labortory K:URW\01- 04- 0041Big -O \700 Const \0006 Comply \03 MasonrygG- 02- 09- 18 -04.x1s]0 G t o-;- -ca-tf Report Number 2 Project Number: 01 -04 -0041 Rev wing Engine FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. Report Number: 1 P ~eject Number: 01 -04 -0041 roject Name: Big O Tire Reported to: JRW Date of Sample: 9/9/04 Copies to: Test Report Mortar Specimens Placement Location : North wall, 4' to 8' elevation. Contractor: Mid Vally Construction, TMC Quantity Represented : 0.33 Cu. Yd. Strength Required : 1800 PS] in 28 days. Number of Specimens: 3 ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: El CONTRACTOR ❑ FPA INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE TEST INFORMATION ON FRESH MORTAR Temperature, Air O F: 59 Mortar ° F: 68 Sampled By: B.McGowan, T2M Time Mixed: 8:00 Time Sampled: 8:25 Weather: Cool, Clear ng ; ❑ CENTRAL MWER ❑TRUCK MD(IER ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ FPA INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER Q CONTRACTOR Cylinders Delivered to Laboratory by ; FPA ❑ CONTRACTOR Field Storage Location: El JOB MMER ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER ❑ OTHER DISIGNATE ❑ ENGINEER ❑ COMMCN CARRIER Size of Specimens : 0 2X4 ❑ 3X6 rnMPPrQCivr QTD V W 9" rrLT T A T A 40 Age in Days Lab Number Date Received Date Tested Cylinder Size it LAAA Total Load Unit Load (psi) Break Type 7 M 04709 09/13/04 09/16/04 2 x 4 4667 1486 B 28 M 04710 09/13/04 10/07/04 2 x 4 6258 1992 B 28 M 04711 09/13/04 10/07/04 2 x 4 6225 1981 B x x x x Tested By: WWM Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials Labora K:URW\01-04 -0041 Big-0\700 Cons[ \0006 Comply \03 Masonry \[M -01 -09 -09- 04.xls]0 �� ,ter► ---� R iewing Engineer FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. Test Report Mortar Specimens Report Number: 2 Project Name: Big O Tire ect Number: 01 -04 -0041 Reported to: JRW Date of Sample : 9/18/04 Copies to: Placement Location : 10" n. of SW corner of Building Contractor: Mid Valley Construction / TMC Quantity Represented : 0.33 Cu. Yd. Strength Required : 1800 PST in 28 days. Number of Specimens : 3 ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FPA INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER Q OTHER DISIGNATE TEST INFORMATION ON FRESH MORTAR Temperature, Air ° F : 61 Mortar ° F: 65 Sampled By: B.McGowen / H.B.S mith Time Mixed: Time Sampled : Weather: Cool/ Breezy Mixing ; ❑ CENTRAL MWER ❑ TRUCK MWER Q JOB MWER ABOVE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ❑ FPA INSPECTOR ❑ PROJECT ENGINEER ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ CONCRETE SUPPLIER Q OTHER DISIGNATE Cylinders Delivered to Laboratory by ; ❑ FPA ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ ENGINEER ❑ COMMCN CARRIER Field Storage Location: Size of Specimens : [212X4 ❑ 3X6 C RTRF.NrT14 nA rA 4t b °: Age in Days Lab Number Date Received Date Tested Cylinder Size Total Load A Unit si Pa) Break Type 7 M 04726 09/20/04 09/25/04 2 x 4 4350 1385 B 28 1 M 04727 09/20/04 10/16/04 2 x 4 5785 1841 B 28 M 04728 09/20/04 10/16/04 2 x 4 5825 1854 B x 1 x i x x Tested By: WWM Reviewed By: William W. McNaughton Manager; Materials La atory K:URW\01- 04- 004IBig-0\700 Constl0006 Comply\03 Mwonry\[MO2 -09- 18-04,x1s]0 ftevim Engi er FORS43RHM ASSOCIATES / INC. A COMPANY OF ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS CMU PRISMS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER TRUCK # TICKET# Mid Vally Construction, TMC CY GROUT INSPECTOR Date Filled 4.00 Walters Ready Mix 0 20 B. McGowan, T2M 8927 9/9/04 Location: Represents pre - construction samples. Date CMU's Made Type of CMU ASTM or IBC Specs. CMU psi Spec. Nominal Size 9/8/04 Weather Air Temp. Grout Temp. Time Batched Time Placed Cool, Clear Water Added Mortar psi Grout psi Mortar Temp. Deg. F. 0 59 1800 70 2000 1500 7:56 68 8" 8:35 Report #: 1 Project Name : Big O Tire Project Number : 01 -04 -0041 Report to: JRW Copies to: B d e a ❑ A f g Date Filled CMU Prism Test Date Date Received I I LJ Filled Block Outside Dementions Wall Thickness A B C UBC ID Number A Age Tested g Greatest Least Height g a b Height to Percent Net Net Area (Sq. Comp c d e f g Least Lateral Corr. Factor Area in.) Failure Load Strength (� 'MU04715 7 9/16/04 7.56 7.63 11.13 1.46 57.66 98540 1709 ' MI M4716 7 9/16/04 7.75 7.63 11.13 1.46 59.09 96340 1630 _N 717 28 10/7/04 7.63 7.63 11.06 1.45 58.14 101000 1737 MU04718 28 10/7/04 7.63 7.63 11.06 1.45 58.14 161880 2784 MU04719 28 10/7/04 7.63 7.63 1 11.00 Note: Compressive strength results are corrected per the UBC correction factor for height -to- thickness ratio. 1.44 58.14 129170T 2222 Remarks: Prisms cured at site. Tested By: T2M Results Reviewed By: �yj1 K:URW\01- 04- 0041Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \03 Masonry\[CMU01- 09- 09- 04fx1s]Sheetl FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. A COMPANY OF ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS CMU PRISMS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER TRUCK # TICKET# Mid Vally Construction / TMC CY GROUT INSPECTOR 5.0 Walters Ready Mix 2 I a B.McGowan 1800 Heide Smith Location: Represents ore- construction samnles Date CMU's Made Type of CMU ASTM or IBC Specs. CMU f m Spec. Nominal Size 18 9/17/04 Weather Air Temp. Grout Temp. Time Batched Time Placed Cool / Breezy Water Added Mortar psi Grout psi Mortar Temp. Deg. F. 2 I a 61 1800 d 68 2000 1500 Height to Least Lateral 65 Percent Net Area 9:00 AM Date Date Received Filled Block Thickness Report #: 2 Project Name : Big O Tire Project Number : 01-04 -0041 Report to: JRW Copies to: A a b $ f g CMU Prism ID Number Test Age Date Tested A I Greatest $ Least C Height I a b c d I e f g Height to Least Lateral Corr. Factor Percent Net Area Net Area (Sq. in.) Failure Load Comp. Strength (psi) CMU04732 7 9/24/04 7 9/16 7 5/8 12 3/16 13/8 13/8 17/8 17/8 1.60 36.27 36980 1020 CMU04733 28 10/15/04 7 5/8 7 5/8 11 1/4 13/8 13/8 17/8 17/8 1 1.48 36.50 54110 1482 CMU04734 28 10/15/04 7 5/8 7 5/8 11 1/4 11/2 13/8 17/8 17/8 1.48 36.86 58210 1579 CMU04735 28 10/15/04 7 5/8 7 5/8 1l 1/2 13/8 13/8 17/8 17/8 1.51 36.50 54920 1505 Note: Compressive strength results are corrected per the UBC correction factor for height -to- thickness ratio. Remarks: Prisms cured at site. Tested By: T2M, B.McGowan Results Reviewed By: L . K:VRW\01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \03 Masonry\[CMU- 02- 09- 18- 04h.xls]S etl FORSGREN ASSOC /AYES / /NC. A COMPANY OF ENGINEERS AND SCIEN77STS CMU PRISMS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER TRUCK # TICKET# Mid Vally Construction / TMC CY GROUT INSPECTOR 5.0 Walters Ready Mix 2 CMU Prism ID Number B.McGowan 1800 Heide Smith Location: Represents pre - construction samples. Date CMU's Made Type of CMU ASTM or IBC Specs. CMU Fm Spec. Nominal Size J8 9/17/04 Weather Air Temp. Grout Temp. Time Batched Time Placed Cool / Breezy Water Added Mortar psi Grout psi Mortar Temp. Deg. F. 2 CMU Prism ID Number 61 1800 Outside Dementions 68 2000 1500 C Height 65 I b 9:00 AM Report #: 3 Project Name: Big O Tire Project Number: 01 -04 -0041 Report to: JRW Copies to: A a b $ f g Date Filled 18- Sep -04 Date Received 9/23/04 0 Filled Block UBC CMU Prism ID Number Test Age Date Tested Outside Dementions Wall Thickness A Greatest $ Least C Height a I b c d e f g Height to Least Lateral Corr. Factor Percent Net Area Net Area (Sq. in.) Failure Load Comp. Strength (psi) CMU04736 7 9/25/04 711/16 7 5/8 1 1/4 0.16 58.62 109660 1871 CMU04737 28 10/16/04 7 5/8 7 '5/8 11 1/4 1.48 58.14 127520 2193 CMU04738 28 10/16/04 7 9/16 7 5/8 11 1/4 1.48 57.66 120520 2090 Note: Compressive strength results are corrected per the UBC correction tactor for height -to- thickness ratio. Remarks: Prisms cured at site. Tested By: T2M Bret McGowan Results Reviewed By: C KAMW\01- 04- 004113ig -0\700 Const \0006 Comply \03 Masonry\[CMU- 03- 09- 18- 04fxls]Sheetl Pag � Of 1 P.O. BoxI43 Rexburg, ID 83440 Daily Field Report i1.Ru RZ IM� Ps aw of Um wMac SpedW _YL A i11 ' • , WAXI-15 0 4 ,k> PilL P ♦ ► l �, s ex , �f � c 4 r qmcw Iopector: i?,� �c 1636276 Ekhfteh 1 Of f P.O. BOX143 Re)b ng, ID 83440 Daily Field Report Locabm eta i_r► ccvz�j 64Z-4 aka �. 54 . 1 ftyof um wwIc specw II L r IVl VU(A�K J �cc�'3d�c�� Go'3� AL Fiel R r r, r r m� y� �� e a 7 ' ° ' N o- - �� • 1 D ay of Ow Weeir-- r r - • 1 M � L ♦ C • w D-ft9e _ of _ P.O. Box143 Rexburg, ID 83440 Daily Field Report ft'* —BrQ o -=v'€s Date: 1 -!4 -Owt. Location: _ �mcw'r.'gD Weaum -. c6cw- i �PrRTUI_ rsu0�( LHenti F i Te"Waftm S'W ftoject mm: 04 - ooa8. Dap of the Weep - UA= gag � • � is s � �,; � . - 2WI ♦ l speoaI IngMd=. NICGo W A4 1 =CqcTkv3D . 103 17 - 70 Page I of 1 2M P.O. Box143 Rexburg, ID 83440 Daily Field Report Mb--. 9 - !S- a4- Location: _ c �csas �� Wevum. COOL A v Client: «."a TernPesftm S7 ° Project ft.: 04- aaag %W of the Week: L&a mrz poky L ta gs � u ^.!► V Imo: -8S M OG-o an d so% ; 1 27 0 Page _ of _ _ - 11 17 G6 P.O. Box143 Rexburg, ID 83440 Daily Field Report Project: SM O 'le s Date: -- Location: 1kJtKs ; L Weather: LwAmi =92Y Client: rj�" GR Temperature: ?0 Project No.: o4- - coca Day of the Week: `MURSb&V - - , .. _�.IVum' tom \ •- Special 'SkAP&6U kAP&6U Daily Field Report Ht �� 3' Page -L O l �f k`4d a; P.O. Box143 Rexburg, ID 83440 Daily Field Report P B� o ,� -Q�.S Location: IZGXt3 {T° Weather: Climb cta p 'Fc SGR Project ir�o.: �4- -a zyOy Tempesatrrre: 7 Day of the Week: - T UM v Special inspector ribs -- wa, tiMU C -7 Pty C M Cd s, R�nf CQIG S 7 ; ,AAJO C*ltaLcrQ Stu ¢1�tc,F Of SA ST MhSo�l�.y twtGL ¢L r^ATr,!W tsr k4(,F CrF 56K7-u MA-7d4-V u- (Au_., 7 o'-,a rz eLZ UAUbL � WIE KkLjF 6r 5OKi14 21' 4 ` Milt 20 - a. zl'i�", C�n� -rail �-r- 6 a� l �T CcSC.�ELSE A L H M6H �,cs nl S ssu��y �tsPSc7� c� u..�s �-c- �Lk ►. ,�-r P fl.4 9 6 G Speca Inspector 3pff — W6twAt ] KM0f'c N0.: M3 sz77o FORSGREN ASSOCIATES/ INC. A COMPANY OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS Project Information: Project Name: Big O Tire Project Owner: Owner Contact: JRW Design Discipline A/E Site Visit Memorandum Date of Visit: October 21, 2004 Project No.: s Project No. (if applicable): Agency Project No. (if applicable) 01 -04 -0041 No. Ambient Conditions: Snow Rain Cloudy Clear Weather: ❑ ❑ 0 66 ❑ Temperature: 45 F. Wind:5 mph N ❑ S ® E ® W ❑ Humidity High® Med❑ Low❑ Contractors on Site: 1 Mid VallyConstruction Mike Shaw 2. Zollinger Construction Andy Zollinger 3. K. 1 5. Observations: Andy Zollinger called about 8:45am and informed me that they would be ready for compaction tests about 11:am. They would be using there %" crushed material for finish grade. Arrived at 11:am, area was not ready. I took an early lunch And returned at 12:00pm. Started testing at the north side and worked around to the south side. The area at the east side was ready by the time I got to that side. There was one area that did not meet a minimum of 95 %. This area was reworked and retested. It came up to standards. Andy Zollinger mentioned that they might pave either Friday or Saturday. I asked him about tempter below 50 f. He said it should not mater because the state allows 40 and raising. I called JRW (Johnny) and we discussed it and he also thought it would be OK. William W. McNaughton Forsgren Representative Distribution: ❑ File ❑ PM ❑ Resident ❑ Owner ❑ Contractor El Other K:WR=01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0002 Document \01 Daily Rpts \Daily Report 10- 21- 04.doc (October 2003; Revised Oct 2003) Form 741 -01 Copyright 2003 Forsgren Associates, Inc. REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GUAGE METHOD PROJECT Big O Tire Client JRW Contractor Mid Valley Construction / Zol linger Construction Weather Cold, Cloudy, Windy SD LOCATION KEY BF Backfill BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing FC Finished Concrete RT Retest SD Storm Drain SL Sewerline TR Trench WL Wall WTL Waterline X PL Parking Lot Alm� FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Report #: 3 Date 10/21/04 Project # 01 -04 -0041 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor REMARKS: Test # 4 failed to meet minimum requirement of 95% compaction. SOIL TYPE TEST MAX DRY DENSITY The area was re- rolled and retested. The retest shows that the area meets minimum 1 Zollinger cruched 3/4" 7.6 130.3 DATE TEST NO. DEPTH LOCATION SOIL % DENSITY % COMPACTION WET DRY SPEC FIELD ELEV. TYPE MOISTURE 10/21/04 1 4" North Side FG 1 8.1% 134.8 124.7 95% 96% 10/21/04 2 4" North West Corner FG 1 5.8% 132.5 125.2 95% 96% 10/21/04 3 4" West Side FG 1 6.5% 132.9 124.8 95% 96% 10/21/04 4 4" South West Corner FG 1 7.8% 130.3 120.9 95% 93% 10/21/04 5 4" South Drive Way FG 1 6.5% 133.2 125.1 95% 96% 10/21/04 6 4" South Side, Big Bay FG 1 6.5% 131.2 123.2 95% 95% 10/21/04 7 4" East side FG 1 7.5% 132.7 123.4 95% 95% 10/21/04 8 4" Retest on #4 FG 1 8.4% 134.6 124.2 95% 95% IL I REMARKS: Test # 4 failed to meet minimum requirement of 95% compaction. SOIL TYPE OPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY The area was re- rolled and retested. The retest shows that the area meets minimum 1 Zollinger cruched 3/4" 7.6 130.3 requirements 2 3 I Test results over 94.5 % are considered passing. j 4 Tested by: W.W.M. Reviewed By: K UWA01 -04 -0041 Big -01700 Const \0006 Comply \01 Soils \Field Density Testsg10 -21 -04 Tests Report.xlslRetests FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. A COMPANY OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS Project Information: Project Name: Big O Tire Project Owner: Owner Contact: JRW No. Design Discipline A/E Site Visit Memorandum Date of Visit: October 21, 2004 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 Project No. (if applicable): Agency Project No. (if applicable) Ambient Conditions: Snow Rain Cloudy Clear Weather. ❑� ❑ N ❑ Temperature: 45 F. Wind:5 mph N ❑ S ® E ® W ❑ Humidity High® Med❑ Low❑ Fog Contractors on Site: 1 Mid VallyConstruction Mike Shaw 2. Zollinger Construction Andy Zollinger 3. 4. 5. Observations: Andy Zollinger called about 8:45am and informed me that they would be ready for asphalt compaction tests about 10:am. They would be using their mix with a marshal value of 141.8 pcf. I arrived at 9:45 am. Asphalt did not arrive until 10:45 am. Started paving at the north side and east side, then west entrance and south side, see attached drawing. William W. McNaughton Forsgren Representative Distribution: ❑ File ❑ PM ❑ Resident ❑ Owner ❑ Contractor ❑ Other K: \Creative Project Solutions \01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0002 Document \01 Daily Rpts \Daily Report 10- 22- 04.doc (October 2003; Revised Oct 2003) Form 741 -01 Copyright 2003 Forsgren Associates, Inc. DATE S iE EET 'I Aqlt 9f715 ql 3 7, 7- f�61 Fl 0 A 1 , �' t� PROJECT Big O T ire REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GAUGE METHOD =_ FORSGREN Client Creative Project Solutions ASSOCIATES /INC. Contractor Mid Valley Construction Report No.: 1 Weather Fog, Cool, Cloudy, Breezy Date: 10/22/04 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 LOCATION KEY BF BP ELC FTG FC RT Backfill Building Pad Electrical Footing Finished Concrete Retest SD Storm Drain SL Trench ine TR Trench WL Wall WTL Waterline PL Parking Lot ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor TEST DATE TEST NO. DEPTH LOCATION SOIL % DENSITY % COMPACTION ELEV. TYPE MOISTURE WET DRY SPEC I FIELD 10/22/04 1 FG Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building FG 1 0.0% 141.5 141.5 96% 100% 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 2 3 4 5 6 FG FG FG FG FG Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building Cold so soon Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building cold to soon Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building FG 1 0.0% 128.9 128.9 96% 91% FG 1 0.0% 138.2 138.2 96% 97% FG FG 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 128.6 134.3 128.6 134.3 96% 96% 91% 95% FG 1 0.0% 139.8 139.8 96% 99% 10/22/04 7 FG Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building FG 1 0.0% 138.7 138.7 96% 98% 1 10/22/04 8 FG Section (1), North side from NW corner to E corner of Building FG 1 0.0% 141.1 1 141.1 96% 100% Average =1 96% Tests 2, and 4 were lower than specified because the asphalt cooled off to quick to reach required compaction. The average of all tests on this section was 96 %. Tested by: W.W.M. KACreative Project Solutions101 -04 -0041 Big -01700 Const10006 Comply101 SoilslField Density TestsuBlank Field Test big- o.xls]Field Density SOIL TYPE JOPT. MOISTURE MAX DRY DENSITY 1 AsphaR , Marshal = 141.8 0.0 141.8 Reviewed By: Page 1 of 4 PROJECT Big O Tire Client Creative Project Solutions Contractor Mid Valley Construction Weather Fog, Cool, Cloudy, Breezy REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GAUGE METHOD FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Report No.: 1 Date: 10/22/04 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 SD LOCATION KEY BF Backfil[ BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing FC Finished Concrete RT Retest REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GAUGE METHOD FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / INC. Report No.: 1 Date: 10/22/04 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade TR Trench FB Finish Base WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor DATE 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 TEST NO. 1 2 3 TEST DEPTH FG FG FG LOCATION Section (2), East side of building ,SE corner of building to NE corner of lot. ELEV. FG FG FG SOIL TYPE 1 1 1 % MOISTURE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% DENSITY % COMPACTION WET 138.2 DRY 138.2 SPEC 96% FIELD 97% 137.2 134.5 137.2 134.5 96% 97% 96% 95% Average = 96% Tests 3 was lower than specified because the asphalt cooled off to quick to reach required compaction. The average of all tests on this section was 96 %. results over 94.5% are considered Tested by: W,W.M. KACreative Project Solutions \01 -04 -0041 Big -0\700 Const \0006 Comply\Ot Soils \Field Density Tests \[Blank Field Test big- o.xls]Field Density I SOIL TYPE 10PT. MOIS I MAX DRY DENSITY' I 1 (Asphalt, Marshal= 141.6 10.0 1141.8 Reviewed By: Page 2 of 4 PROJECT Big O Tire Client Creative Project Solutions Contractor Mid Valley Construction Weather Fog, Cool, Cloudy, Breezy REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GAUGE METHOD AFn FORSGREN ASS OCIA TES / INC. Report No.: 1 Date: 10/22/04 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 SD LOCATION KEY BF Backfill BP Building Pad ELC Electrical FTG Footing FC Finished Concrete RT Retest REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GAUGE METHOD AFn FORSGREN ASS OCIA TES / INC. Report No.: 1 Date: 10/22/04 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 SD Storm Drain ELEVATION KEY SL Sewerline FG Finish Grade TR Trench FIB Finish Base WL Wall FSB Finish Sub Base WTL Waterline FSG Finish Sub Grade PL Parking Lot FF Finish Floor KACreative Project Solutions \01 -04 -0041 Big -0 \700 Const \0006 Comply \01 Soils \Field Density Tests \[Blank Field Test big- o.xls]Field Density Page 3 of 4 I esteo by: W.W.M. Reviewed By: a PROJECT Big O Tire Client Creative Project Solutions Contractor Mid Valley Construction Weather Fog, Cool, Cloudy, Breezy REPORT OF IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS BY NUCLEAR GAUGE METHOD DATE 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 LOCATION KEY FG Finish Grade BF Backfill SD Storm Drain BP Building Pad SL Sewerline ELC Electrical TR Trench FTG Footing WL Wall FC Finished Concrete WTL Waterline RT Retest PL Parking Lot DATE 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 ELEVATION KEY FG Finish Grade FB Finish Base FSB Finish Sub Base FSG Finish Sub Grade FF Finish Floor DATE 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 10/22/04 TEST NO. 1 2 3 4 5 TEST DEPTH FG FG FG FG FG LOCATION Section (5), South side, from Center entrence to East entrance. ELEV. FG FG FG FG FG SOIL TYPE 1 1 1 1 1 % MOISTURE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% DENSITY % COMPACTION WET 134.9 134.5 139.0 136.8 137.2 DRY 134.9 SPEC 96% FIELD 95% 134.5 96% 95% 139.0 96% 98% 136.8 96% 96% 137.2 96% 97% Average = 96% REMARKS: Tests 1 & 2 were lower than specified because the asphalt cooled off to quick to reach required compaction. The average of all tests on this section was 96 %. results over 94.5% are considered passing. Tested by: W.W.M. KACreative Project Solutions \01 -04 -0041 Big -OV00 Const \0006 Comply \01 Soils \Field Density Tests\ Blank Field Test big- o.xls]Field Density FORSGREN AFM=a ASSOCIATES / INC. Report No.: 1 Date: 10/22/04 Project No.: 01 -04 -0041 I SOIL TYPE 10PT. MOI I MAX DRY DENSITY I I 1 (Asphalt, Marshal= 141.8 10.0 141,8 Reviewed By: Page 4 of 4