Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutALL DOCUMENTS - 08-00137 - Larch Drive - Pine Brook Estates PH2 - Preliminary Plat03/21/2008 16:07 12085229232 SCHIESS &ASSOCIATES Prelimina /Final Plat City of Rexburg 12 North Center Phone: 208.359,3020 Rexbu ID 83440 www.rcxburg.org Fox: 208.359,3022 �, Q griXlll�Rr,' PAGE 02/04 G1'rY ov .. . _` .. ..... . ��...._. T ............_..._.......... - _......_.._ CW ...__............_.__........ Amerier6l"auflly Cbmnuud()- A}�$ 1cation for Approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plat The attached Subdivision plan has been prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Rexburg, and the following items are shown on the plan or plans, or explanations given with .respect thereto. 0 u' e e is qr�Prelimiinary Plats All Preliminary Plats shall be 24' x 36' ,fol.d:+.bl.e, drawn to scale, North point, dated. The following ja, be sh on the Preliminary Plat or shall be submitted separately: 1. The name of the proposed subdivision: N� rbo7 � ✓ e�- Al 2. The location �S-Q c- 31 T(i2 It 31 Acreage Number of Lots //5 3. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the subdivider or subdividers and the engineer or su.t-vcyo.r who prepared the plat: Subdiviider l `ao O 4R_3 ` 7ss 7 1, �^ Name: ur fC r rW Address: J" 4rr) /,D Phone Number: 70 �o j Cell Number: � � Engineer � NI - P �& �•�es5 � 4' SoCM 4 Add.ress: Phone Number: 35(0 - 6o`-/ 2-i Cell. Number: Surveyor 01 1 � � Name_ Address: Phone Number; Cell Number: 4. The na e and address of 2ll laro} ?Y owners Lvithin 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subdivision whether ot not bisected by a public right - of: - way o.s shown. on record in the County Assessor's office. 5. The leg.i;l dcscripdon of the subd.ivis.ion. 03/21/2008 16 :07 12085229232 SCHIESS &ASSOCIATES PAGE 03/04 • 0 6, A rratemerLt�f the i ended use of the Proposed sub iya is on such as- Residential — (single family, two - family and multiple housing); Commercial., lndastrial, Recreational or Agricultural. Show sites proposed for pgrlcs, playgrounds, schools, church ,, s or other public areas. 7. scheduled for development if the proposed subdivision is a portion of a larger holding intended for subsecluent development. 8. A vicinity map showing the .relationship of the proposed plat to tlic surrounding area (1/2 mile of minimum .radius, scale optional). 9. Strccts, street. names, .rights -of -way, a.nd roadway widths, including adjoining streets or. roadways, curbs and sidewalks. 10. Lot ,lines and blocks showing the dimensions and numbers of each.. I I. Contour lines, shown at five (5) leet intervals where land slope is greater than. ten percent (10%) and at two (2) feet, intervals where land slope is ten percent (10 %) or less, referenced to an established bench mark, including location and elevation. 12. Any gTQj sc or existing uti lu�LU, including, but not limited to, storm and sanitary sewers, irrigation laterals, ditches, drains, bridges, culverts, water ma.inK, fire hydrants, power, gas, street lights and their respective profiles and easements. 13. A copy of any proposed restrictive covenants and /or deed restrictions. (To be attached or su.bm.itted with final plan). 14. Any dedications to die public anal /or casements, together with a statement of location., d.ime.nsions, and purpose of such. Please complete the following: (If not app.bcab.le, please Fill. in with N /.A) 1. What is the land use and existing Toning of the proposed subdivision and the adia.cent land? 2. Toes subdivision co»form to present zoning? 3. Requested zoning! 4. Variance Requested: Yes No / (If yes, attach written request) 5. Requesting annexation to City? 2 03/21/2008 16:07 12085229232 SCHIESS &ASSOCIATES PAGE 04/04 ITEMS FOR CON TDE TIQN Probably impact of the proposed project on the environment cffect on a. Public safety and convenience b. fire, polio:, and ambulance services c. Recreation d. Schools e Displacement or .relocation of people f. La.ad values g. Loca] and long - distance travel, Le., highway and loca road impact h. Behavior of wildlife species i. Wages quality and ef..fcct on underground water supply j. Noisc pollution k. Air pollution 1. Mcthod proposed to dispose of storm drainage warcrs m. Extent of increased city road main.te»ance, including snow removal n. Flood plain — merhods proposed to alleviate cffect of 100 -year flood; effect on adjacent properties o. provisions for housing for persons of low and moderate income p. Hs.rmony with the character of surrounding developments 2. Probably adverse env.iroiame.ntal effects which cannot be avoided a. Traffic Use b. Rights -of -way required c. ho.11ution cf..fect on existing cnvi.ronment 3. Relationship between local short -term uses of man's economic envirom and the long -term productivity. s. ,,Fxisting vs. proposed tax base b. Costs to City if proposal. approved (annual) 4. Measutcs taken to minimize harmful effects on environment a. Effects of construction activities b. Erosion control C. Stream pollution prevention d. Borrow-pit rehabilitation c. Fencing f. Buffer znnes g. replacement of pa.rldands or .farmlands 5. is this plat plan. harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the City's Comprehensive Plan? ff� YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT TF.F. REXBURG PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 16:07 12085229232 0 SCHIESS &ASSOCIATES 0 S Schiess &Associates ENGINEERING •PLANNING •LAND SURVEYING 7103 South 45 West • Idaho Falls. ID 83402 (208) 522 -1244 • Fax(208)522 -9232 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET PAGE 01/04 TO: / FROM: COMPANY; DATE: �o 06 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PA DES INCLUDING COVER: PHONE NUMBER; R.E. ❑ IJRGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW /COMMENT ❑ PLEASE, REPLY ❑ AS, REQUF6TFn ❑ POR APPROVAL NOTES /COMMENTS; P &e- b rbck lz of . 1/ - If 111 referenced pages are not received, please notify us immediatcly. 2008 Findings of Fact 48EXBUgU Ri o •r CITY OF City of Rexburg p o REX 1� c� 12 North Center Phone: 208.359.3020 America's Family Community Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208.359.3022 Preliminary Plat — Pine Brook Estates Division 2 1. On March 21, 2008, Kurt Roland of Schiess and Associates, presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Coordinator a Request and Application for a Preliminary Plat for PineBrook Estates Division 2.. 2. On May 1, 2008, Kurt Roland, and Curtis Ferney, developer, presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Commission the Request for approval of the Preliminary Plat for Pine Brook Estates Division 2. Dan Hanna motioned to recommend for approval to City Council the preliminary plat for Pine Brook Estates Division 2, to include that lot 12 block 3 be addressed for connectivity, that there be a privacy barrier from the highway on the east and the west, and that lots along the highway be buffered by landscaping, that lots 1 through 4 of block 1 be included in a setback buffered landscaped area along 12 West, that the connectivity of the 2 cul -de -sacs on Larch Drive and on Castle Pines be addressed, that the street name issues be addressed, and that all other recommendations stated in the staff reviews be addressed. Ted Hill seconded the motion. Those In Favor: Those Opposed: David Stein Mike Ricks Ted Hill Randall Porter Mary Ann Mounts Dan Hanna Thaine Robinson Motion Carried. 3. On May 21, 2008 City Attorney Zollinger and Planning and Zoning Administrator Leikness reviewed some of the history indicating the road alignment was not decided in the discussions; however, the developer was asked to connect the streets to avoid the cul -de -sac due to snow removal issues. This particular cul -de -sac was removed and the road was moved to a different location causing a change in the road alignment. Council Member Schwendiman reviewed the two possibilities for Block 7 and Block 6 and how they interface with Pine Brook No. 1. Council Member Mann moved to approve Pine Brook Estates Division 2 as originally shown tonight with the double cul -de -sac option submitted in the original Preliminary Plat drawings dated April 14, 2008; Council Member Schwendiman seconded the motion; Discussion: City Attorney Zollinger explained the developer needs to meet with the homeowners to clear up the concerns with the cul -de -sacs. Mayor Larsen suggested having the homeowners, neighbors from Mcjon Lane, the developer and City Staff meet outside city influence to resolve the issues surrounding the cul -de -sacs and street alignment. 0 a Mike Mitchell from McJon Lane voiced a desire to be part of the meeting. He wanted to discuss the issue of the additional traffic on McJon Lane. He asked about the length of the northeast corner. City Attorney Zollinger said it is not a cul -de -sac according to city standards. City Attorney Zollinger explained he did not think traffic would impact McJon Lane because people take the course of least resistance. Some traffic will go down McJon Lane. Public Works Director John Millar said curbing and 34 foot half road width on the south side will be added to McJon Lane by the developer. Council Member Mann reiterated the City's commitment to the neighbors to maintain the two cul -de- sacs. Council Member Stout explained he feel this is treating people differently. It is giving something to one group of people and not extending the same courtesy to another group that could be affected by this development. Those voting aye Those voting nay Richard Woodland Adam Stout Chris Mann Randy Schwendiman The motion carried. O� gfx B UR CITY O F R EX B URG America's Family Community April 1, 2008 Mr. Curtis Ferney 67 Winn Dr. Suite 100 Rexburg, Id 83440 Re: Pine Brook Estates Div.2, Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Ferney: Your application for the Pine Brook Estates Division 2 Preliminary Plat has been determined to be incomplete. Items 1, 2, and 7 below must be submitted in order for the City to determine your application complete and begin a review and move the application on to the Planning Commission and City Council. The additional items, 3 -6, are items that will be brought up at a public meeting on the matter. It is up to you whether or not you wish to submit a revision to your submitted plat at this time, or after the meetings with the Commission and Council. 1. No information has been submitted on how water or sewer service will be provided to the development. 2. A street lighting plan needs to be submitted. 3. Eliminate the cul -de -sac between block 4 and 5. 4. Connect the cul -de -sac in block 6 5. The lots that front onto existing streets must have the street developed to the same standard as all other streets. 6. The cul -de -sac on the west end needs to be connected. 7. Water for the site must be obtained and provided Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Elaine McFerrin Planning & Zoning Coordinator cc: File #08 00137 Kurt Roland, Schiess & Associates Flaine McFerrin, Planning & Zoning City of Rexburg 19 E Main Rexburg, ID 83440 Phone: 208.359.3020 ext.334 Fax: 208.359.3024 elainem @rexburg.org 9 0 Elaine McFerrin From: Elaine McFerrin Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:54 PM To: John Millar Cc: Gary Leikness Subject: Letter re 08 00137 Pine Brook Estates Div. 2 Prelim Plat - "hold" status Attachments: 08 00137 Pine Brook Estates Div 2 Prelim Plat - Incomplete App.docx; image002.jpg John, Per my conversation with you regarding the "hold " status of the Pine Brook Estates Div. 2 Prelim Plat and your requesting that the applicant be notified, I have sent the attached letter, which includes your notes from the LIS System, to Curtis Ferney . Thank you, i l fS tli REXBURG Elaine K. McFerrin Planning &Zoning Coordinator Phone: 208 359 -3020 ext. 334 Fax: 208 359 -3024 6D n -� rt 4 f R ECEIVEO DEC 1 8 20 www.Jefferies.com 0 91 1 SCHOp� Ar � n —1 � s O 321 zo q ®RD F � 4D Madison School District O 290 North First Fast; P.O. Box 830; Rexburg, iD 83440 (208) 359 -3300 - phone, (208) 359 -3345 - fax http: / /www.d321.kl2.id.us Geoffrey M. Thomas, Ed.D. Superintendent 12 -14 -07 Honorable Mayor Shawn Larsen Rexburg City Council City Hall 12 North Center Rexburg, ID 83440 Varr Snedaker, CPA Business Manager D. Simmons, Ed.S. Special Services Director On behalf of the Board of Trustees and Madison School District 321, I wanted to write and express our opinion regarding the potential annexation and development of the property on Pine Brook No. 2, with 93.15 acres north of Teton Lakes Golf Course. Recognizing that our community is growing and that change is inevitable, typically, we are in favor of growth and expansion. At this stage the district's official position is one of neutrality in regards to the proposed annexation and potential expansion of the aforementioned acreage and subdivision. However, we would request the Mayor and City Council to please consider the demographic and financial impact on an already heavily burdened school district. As you are aware, with multiple bond and levy attempts, that we are continuously struggling to address overcrowding and aging facilities issues. Construction costs are escalating rapidly. The cost per square foot ranges now from $ 170 -220. Simply to furnish a classroom is $ 5,000. A computer room is $ 50,000. In addition there are increased textbooks, school buses and classroom aides costs. Rather than have current taxpayers shoulder these additional costs unilaterally, if there is a method by which a school impact fee may be levied on those developing the project, or a requirement that acreage be set aside for future school construction it would be of great support to the district. Thank you for service to the community and in making these challenging decisions. Sincerely, Geoffrey M. Thomas Ed.D. Superintendent Madison School District 321 • Date: December 18, 2007 To: Rexburg Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Beth and Ted Hendricks • RECEIVED DEC 1 8 2007 Subject: Annexation of Property known as Pine Brook 2 and Pine Brook Division No. 1, Madison County, Idaho We are opposed to the proposed annexation of the above stated property and revoke our Request for Annexation. At the public hearing held on November 15, 2007, before the Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission, the homeowners in Pine Brook Division No. 1 and Pine Brook 2 all signed a conditional approval to be annexed. At that meeting, the City Attorney stated that conditional approvals did not have merit and that we were either, "for annexation or opposed" which created confusion and may have lead the Planning & Zoning Commission to assume that all current homeowners in Pine Brook Division No. 1 and Pine Brook 2 were in favor of annexation. Yet, in the last paragraphs of both Public Notices it states, "At such hearing the Planning & Zoning Commission will hear all persons and all objections and recommendations relative to such proposed approval." Notice of Public Hearing dated on October 26, 2007, page 4. "At such hearing the City Council will hear all persons and all objections and recommendations relative to such proposed approval." Notice of Public Hearing dated November 21, 2007, page 3. These Notices asked for recommendations which in our minds is a position of mediation not a "for or opposed" position. Therefore, if you would like to hear our recommendation it was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission in a formal written notice dated November 12, 2007. To avoid confusion and conditional communication, we again state that we are opposed to the annexation and the proposed zoning. i n Hen ricks Beth Hendricks December 18, 2007 RECEIVED DEC 1 0 7007 An open letter to the City of Rexburg, City Council: Dear Council Members, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed annexation and re- zoning of the Pine Brook Div. No. 2 property (formerly Doug Smith's farm)_ Before I give my reasons for opposing, I want to be clear in stating that I am not opposed to development in general; and I'm not even opposed in particular when development is planned to happen in my backyard so to speak. I will sum up my opposition in three questions: Why here ?, Why now ?, and Why this particular type of change? This annexation and re- zoning seems to fly in the face of Rexburg's own comprehensive plan objectives. In the comprehensive plan it states this objective: "Encourage compact development to retain a convenient city. Promote continuous development rather than leapfrogging or bypassing county areas." The property in question is on the periphery of Rexburg proper, and is only connected by virtue of the Teton Lakes Golf Course that already juts out from the more contiguous confines of Rexburg itself. This annexation is a "reach." Not only is it a reach, but, for all intents and purposes, it creates an "island" type of community that would be part of Rexburg, but very separate from Rexburg. In fact, one would need to drive approximately 1.5 miles outside of Rexburg to reach the new subdivision. There is no way to drive from city hall to this annexation without leaving the city limits for a mile and a half on county roads. In addition to its isolation, the new neighborhood would be unduly dense with respect to surrounding developments. Even though the development would probably enhance the Rexburg tax base and benefit the developer and builders, this should not be the purpose of accepting development proposals. The comprehensive plans states this goal: "To promote the public interest, the interest of the community at large, rather than the interests of individuals or special groups within the community." The Hibbard community is rural, and the community interest is to keep the "Hibbard feel" to its neighborhoods. Finally, with expanded development in and around Rexburg, we need to be increasingly sensitive to stresses placed on groundwater purity through the number of septic drainage fields, and to the additional draws on the groundwater with additional pumps on properties. This annexation would require a city hook -up to sewer and water, and that is good for both of the above water reasons. However, the land could similarly be developed under its current zoning and have minimal impact as well. If the county would require developments to manage their own waste and water according to the needs of the community, then annexation is not required for effectively dealing with additional stresses on groundwater issues. In summary, if the City Council is truly committed to measured and wise growth according to its own comprehensive plan, then it must reject the proposed annexation and re- zoning. Hibbard is undoubtedly going in the direction of annexation and development, but this particular proposal is not in keeping with the already rural nature of the community and is not in keeping with Rexburg's own plans for smart growth. In fact, the comprehensive plan states that "over one - quarter of the lands within the [city] boundaries are vacant. The majority of these vacant lands are in residential areas." Not only does Hibbard not need this kind of development, but Rexburg doesn't need it either. Rexburg has plenty of residential space available to be developed before it needs to reach further out. Rexburg's comprehensive plan and careful consideration by elected officials should drive annexation decisions. Annexation should not be driven by the whims of developers who stand to make a pretty penny by getting the annexation and re- zoning they desire. I recommend that the council reject this plan and wait to move in this direction until it is under a scenario of more contiguous growth and in a more community- sensitive way. Sincerely, Ronald M. Nate, Ph.D. 2139 Ferris Lane Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Phone: 356-7375 `yp , 0 ,5CH0 p� Madison School District 321 o 290 North First East; ?.n. Box 830; Rexburg, ID 83440 (208) 359 -3300 - phone, (208) 359 -3345 - fax http: / /www.d321.kl2.id.us .10 - Geoffrey M. Thomas, Ed.D. Varr Snedaker, CPA Superintendent D. Simmons, U.S. Business Manager Special Services Director 12 -14 -07 Honorable Mayor Shawn Larsen Rexburg City Council City Hail 12 North Center Rexburg, ID 83440 On behalf of the Board of Trustees and Madison School District 321, I wanted to write and express our opinion regarding the potential annexation and development of the property on Pine Brook No. 2, with 93.15 acres north of Teton Lakes Golf Course. Recognizing that our community is growing and that change is inevitable, typically, we are in favor of growth and expansion. At this stage the district's official position is one of neutrality in regards to the proposed annexation and potential expansion of the aforementioned acreage and subdivision. However, we would request the Mayor and City Council to please consider the demographic and financial impact on an already heavily burdened school district. As you are aware, with multiple bond and levy attempts, that we are continuously struggling to address overcrowding and aging facilities issues. Construction costs are escalating rapidly. The cost per square foot ranges now from $ 170 -220. Simply to furnish a classroom is $ 5,000. A computer room is $ 50,000. In addition there are increased textbooks, school buses and classroom aides costs. Rather than have current taxpayers shoulder these additional costs unilaterally, if there is a method by which a school impact fee may be levied on those developing the project; or a requirement that acreage be set aside for future school construction it would be of great support to the district. Thank you for service to the community and in making these challenging decisions. Sincerely, Geoffrey M. Thomas Ed.D. Superintendent Madison School District 321 1. • Gary Leikness From: Craig Rindlisbacher Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:08 PM To: 'Grant Thorson'; 'kroland @schiesseng.com' Cc: Elaine McFerrin; Gary Leikness Subject: RE: Road Name Request for Approval Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Grant, After looking into the Canyon Creek Plat I became perplexed because the names "Stockyard" and "Colt" where familiar to me put not in our current street system. After further thought I came to realize that both of those names along with "Pony Creek" are being used in the proposed PineBrook II which is also being prepared by your company. I called Kurt Roland to ask for clarification. He indicated that he would like to move ahead with the names here on the Canyon Creek Plat but will change them on the PineBrook 11 prelim plat. The other names of "Crain Road "and "Browing Way" will work. Craig From: Grant Thorson [mailto:gthorson @schiesseng.com] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:04 AM To: Craig Rindlisbacher Cc: 'Harley Wilcox'; 'Marty' Subject: Road Name Request for Approval Craig, Here is our plat. We ask that you review it and give comment on road names. Grant L. Thorson, PE Project Engineer Schiess & Associates A Company of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Idaho Falls Office 7103 South 45th West Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 Phone: (208)522 -1244 Fax:(208)522 -9232 Email:gthorson@schiesseng.com This message may contain confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. lb 0 OS pF.x6(tR�, _CITY OF REX America's Family Community April 1, 2008 Mr. Curtis Ferney 67 Winn Dr. Suite 100 Rexburg, Id 83440 Re: Pine Brook Estates Div.2, Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Ferney: Your application for the Pine Brook Estates Division 2 Preliminary Plat has been determined to be incomplete. Items 1, 2, and 7 below must be submitted in order for the City to determine your application complete and begin a review and move the application on to the Planning Commission and City Council. The additional items, 3 -6, are items that will be brought up at a public meeting on the matter. It is up to you whether or not you wish to submit a revision to your submitted plat at this time, or after the meetings with the Commission and Council. 1. No information has been submitted on how water or sewer service will be provided to the development. 2. A street lighting plan needs to be submitted. 3. Eliminate the cul -de -sac between block 4 and 5. 4. Connect the cul -de -sac in block 6 5. The lots that front onto existing streets must have the street developed to the same standard as all other streets. 6. The cul -de -sac on the west end needs to be connected. 7. Water for the site must be obtained and provided Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Elaine McFerrin Planning & Zoning Coordinator cc: File #08 00137 Kurt Roland, Schiess & Associates Elaine McFerrin, Planning & Zoning City of Rexburg 19 E Main Rexburg, ID 83440 Phone: 208.359.3020 ext.334 Fax: 208.359.3024 elainem @rexburg.org Mar. 24. 2008 8: 57AM 10 of No. 6043 P, 2 Affldavlf of Legal Interest City of Rexburg 12 North Center Phone: 208.359.3020 R6%4vrg, V 93444 WWW.r*XtHv.vrg FW. 209.359.3022 �46���U45 r a CITY OF REXBURG ..� 516, Axw1aes Fancily Community State of Idaho County of Madison I, / is ail Nam eyNO Ids Being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and sap: 67A), o Ql 5 � /00 me / — d -�o state (If Applicant is also Owner of Record, skip to B) A. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my patnission to: Name Address to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. B. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold Rexburg City and its employees hatmless from any china or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements Contain herin or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this J ,a el- day of Subscnbed said sworn to before .�� 5 Ffe ETA.. r s i r 0 ,,S °yam of��� : 20 09 h u� &k��Ag Notary Pubhe of Idaho Residing at: _ &)C U !' My commission expires: 7 _ 7 — O q Schiess & Associates PINE BROOK ESTATES Div. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 "" F & I: � `r' "`''YG`'N"` "G'`'N"sitDam,0 "G PART OF S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH RA 522- � � R 39 EAST, B.M. (206) 522 -12 (206) 336 -6092 NWC°R AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF REXBURG, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO sECTION 13 T,6N., R.39E.B M. INST No l_ Z N00'11'19Yi � NDO'11'19w 9.i2' 9.38' S89 '59'39 x 1923 - 69 x` Lot 5 - I - Lot 4 } E Lot 6 s 5 344 45. 9'S3°E 1294.73' $es u f / m r Lot 1 Lot 2 � of 3 1, Lot 4 Lot 6 Lot 5 ! Lot 2 Lot 3 _ ' : Lot 24 �f m I Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 l lot 1 1 Lot 4 L r LOC 3 � I L O - : _K Loti �_�_ /, / Lot 11 �b r J / 5 Lot 12 Lot 6 ; " --°� ;` �/ Lot 10 /f f � Lot 23 Lo�.1 Lot 10 Lot 9 Lot 29 Lot 28 Lot 8 Lot 7 . (, Lot 8 / - - Lot 27 Lt 13 f T ^ o O W z o - _ s Lot 7 o Lot 10 Lot 1 Lt 12 �� �� 9 Lot 22 f s f _. / m eos -- c - e LOt 8 a s a �� \ Lot / / / g j l -�s. _' Lot 26 �' Lot 13 p - -- - "*,� d rya / / € � � _ / � � ,�' ; �� ,° V i � r` . Lot 21 " f Lot ; 1 Lot,16 Lot 17 Lot 18 Lot 19 Lot 20 \ E3 -O C K 4 Lot 14 a l Lot Lot 20 Lot 19 / a N Lot 24 Lot 2a L01: Loft / Lot 20 LIFT STATION 2 .00 \ �- o, ;; Lot 21 � Lot 18 Lot 15 Lot 29 Lot 26 Lot 25 - __.._, - - __ __ Lot 17 / / // w E Lot 28 °rt 1269 88' 27 Lot 24 Lot 23 Lot 22 = " / of 19 BLOCK 3���- _ - - -- - t / - L //E 39'59 _ __..- ._ - - - - .._ _ / � , ` \ O 16 .. i / c� _ _ -, , n _ -, , - mss _ , , q Lbt 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 18 5 - �5 P.O. -s9 N89°59'4sw 111s.e2 =_3 =s =y9s LOt 6 LOt 7 \ Lot 1 I `> f' I Lot 14 e zozaa' soo'1rz4 E sag °s94sw 93tr l Lot 17 6 / Cot 8 f Lot 7 Lof fi 5 - I chL =laatr aaa f N % f \ , h8= N53'3925w II - - - - - B GRAPHIC SCALE L O K 6 /� Lot 16 " f ( > / Lot 13 lot 11 Lot 9 2W 6 106 xw ,00 i Lot 1 ��Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 n- zs3°4 bss o Lot 10 I w -_ L- 221 43' z a S l; C i K 2 i I - - ChL =80.00 / Lot 15 B L m I Lot 3 i �- Lot _ Ch8= N36'S2'26'W \ I� Q / 8 IN F M .�' _ _ 12 0 1 inch =zoo 2t S89 °59'46"! \' / 4 / 8 Lot 4 - - - - - - - - 11 3Z89 Lot 12 Lot 13 Lot 14 s8 8 ' Nw coR Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot $ LOt 9 3 / s �>� SECTION 73 T.6N., P-39E.B.M. Lot 5 Lot 10 0 48 / �f/ INST. NO. BLOCK 1 Z 589 °59'4fiw 1118.00' .ep r W 1/4 COR FIRE SUPPRESSION WELL N89 °59'S5'E 419.33' SECTION 13 T.6N., R.39E,B,M. / />✓ f g INST. NO. T pN pL LA/V� s \... a / i .,= - VICINITY MAP _ 1STER 1 � F tG,p 4 rE OF OP PLO r PROJECT LOCATION . r l f o �t����. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ,qty 1 i' Part of the South Halt of the North Half (S 1/2 N 7 /2) of Section 13, Township 6 North, Range 39 East of the Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho described as follows: ¢ q x Beginning at point that is N.00'11 1'19"W. 629.35 feet along the section line from the 'Nast Quarter comer of said Section 13 and running thence N.00 °7 1'19 "W. 788.65 feet LEGEND along said section line to the Southwest comer of the property as described in Instrument No. 337758; thence along the boundary of said property the following three (3) x . a( 4 Y (� I : i d) courses: (1) N.89 °48'41 "E. 220.00 feet; thence (2) N.00 °11'19 "W. 198.00 feet; thence (3) 5.89 °48'41"W. 220.00 feet to the west line of said Section 13; thence �. 7 ¢ N.00 °11'19 "W. 285.50 feet along said west line to the Southwest corner of the First Amended Plat, J and M Subdivision, Madison Court ,Idaho; thence along the south I '� 1 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING PLACED 5/8"x 24" IRON ROD boundary of said J and M Subdivision the following three (3) courses: (1) S.89 °5939 "E. 1923.66 feet to a found '' /V iron rod; thence (2) N. 9 °54'46 "E. 344.45 feet to a found WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 /ron red t t 3 ( ) " id he Southeast corner of said J and M Subdivision; thence N.00 °11'1 9"W. 9.12 feet to the north line of the South Half of the North Half (S 12 N 1/2) of said �.. - ROADWAY CENTERLINE PLACED 1/2" x 24" IRON ROD Section 13; thence N.89 °59'53 "E. 1294.33 feet along said north line to a point on a curve on the westerly right -of -way line of U.S. Highway No. 20, Federal Aid Project No. - t mm zT��,/,' r,.,,_ PROPERTY LINE WITH F- 6471(82); thence 1561.16 feet along said curve to the left, Curve Data: Delta = 10 °15'52' Radius = 8714.37 feet Chord bearing = S 32 °46'49W 155908 feet to the CAP MA K P LOT LINE R ED .L.S. 9369 east -west centedine through the section; thence N.89 °59'55"W. 419.33 feet along said east -west centerline to the Southeast corner of Pine Brook Subdivision, Division No. A FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE UTILITY FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD 1, Madison County, Idaho; thence along the boundary of said Pine Brook Subdivision the following eight (8) courses: (1) N.00 °00'14 "W. 246.84 feet; thence (2) °59'46 "W. - S.89 32.80 feet to a point on a curve; thence (3) 221.43 feet along said curve to the left, Curve Data: Delta = 253 °44'25 ", Radius = 50.00 feet, Chord bearing = EASEMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED ALONG ALL ROAD FOUND 12" IRON ROD N.36 °52'26 "W. 80.00 feet; thence (4) N.00 °00'14 "W. 220.65 feet; thence (5) S.89 °59'46"W. 793.71 feet; thence (6) S.00 1'24"E. 14.30 feet to a point on a curve; thence (7) 202.48 feet along said curve, Curve Data: Delta = 72 °41'38 ", Radius = 159.59 feet, Chord bearing = N.53 °3925"W. 189.17 feet; thence (6) S.89 °59'46 "W. 1269.88 feet FRONTAGES WITHIN EACH LOT. 0 PROPOSED MANHOLE to the point of beginning. TRACT ZONING-RR2 ALL OTHER EASEMENTS ARE - TEN FEET WIDE UNLESS PROPOSED LIGHT POLE Parcel contains 61.35 acres and is subject to the existing County Road right-of-way ak, the west side of the above described parcel. 1 g ty 9 >' n9 DEVELOPER- CURTIS FERNEY OTHERWISE NOTED REXBURG, IDAHO * PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ALSO (208) 709 -0001 PRESSURE SEWER LINE FIRE SUPPRESSION LINE PROPOSED FLUSH HYDRANT Part of the South Half of the North Half S 1/2 N 1/2 of , Township North, Range an a 39 East of the Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho descdbed as follows: ( ) f Si 13 T p 6 N 9 ENGINEER- SCHIESS & ASSOCIATES SANITARY SEWER LINE m PROPOSED WATER VALVE Beginning at the West Quarter corner of said Section 13 and running thence NOD °11'19"W 565.35 feet along the west section tine of said Section 13 to the Southwest 1703 S. 45th W. IDAHO FALLS, ID CONTOURS SECTION CORNER comer of Pine Brook Subdivision, Division No. 1, Madison County, Idaho; thence along the bounds of said Pine Brook Subdivision the following two 2 courses; 1 b, 9 boundary g O ( ) °59'46 "E (208) 522 -1244 N89 1119.82 feet; thence (2) S00 °00'14 "E 565.35 feet to the south section lire of said Section 13; thence along said section line S89 °59'46 "W 1118.00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel contains 14.52 acres and is subject to the existing County Road right -of -way along the west side of the above described parcel. S 1 OF 4 Schiess & Associates 4 ENGINEERING- PLANNING -LAND SURVEYING K" FALLS, NAM REXBt1Rfs. M" (208) 522 -1244 (208) 35e -W92 PINE BROOK ESTATES Div. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT PART OF S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 39 EAST, B.M. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF REXBURG, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO McJON LANE - - -- -- -.. _ - -- - - - - D ! - - - w - -. -13 . -- - - - 3191' IT 31.47 - N 0'00 Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 f Lot 5 o Lot 6 i Lot 1 Lot 2 0 Lot 4 0.587 Acres 0 534 Acres m 8 0.533 Acres i 0.533 Acres 0.533 Acres 0.583 Acres 0 0.515 Acres ° 0.503 Acres N 0.574 Acres S W E �" N LOCK 3 z� -N TN Lol 0.568 Acres ° z S it 7435 170.00' 154,87' ! 154.88' 154.88' 154.88' 170.00 N89'5T39'W S89°59'39"E 146.D0 178.69' 89, 1 _ y0° 2 4489 "59'39'W NI 589 °48'4i W - S89° 59' 39"E 19�. - 150.00 143.50' 143.50' 153.50' 150.00' N89 ° 59'39' N 0 ,9 z tL3 e 14 ; '' 3 i 2296' 8626. Lot Lot 6 11 g 'a Lot 12 J:626 Acres.. ° Lot 10 o Lot 9 - Lol 8 Lot 7 Lot 29 Lot 28 0 '� s 0.597 Acres 0.526 Acres g 0 500 Acres o 0.501 Acres ° 0.501 Acres S 0.534 Acres ( 0.521 Acres 0.512 Acres 7� . z N89 °48'41 °E 170. h N z z m m Lot 27 00' ` 6 - `H 0.512 Acres g' -' GRAPHIC SCA 31.47 i 7.41' 25.3 73.84' _ 14 3' .P�� LE 5 100 0 80 100 200 ___ 3.50' -- - - .0' - __ ___ 133.50' _. __ - 13G.00 -- 90 � 8 � Lot 7 ^ 0.514 Acre Lot 13 "F$ SA - WFS 8"F' Oo Lot 26 `� F `\ 0.519 Acres 1 � 0.504 Acres o m --" �$"SS r =' t 0' S =-@ ^� ( IN Fur INSTRUMENT � \w 30.60' 1 inch 100 ft- t '� 73.85' - 149.9T- - -- 149.9T - - 149.9T - - 149.9T -- 83.9S- g 10171' 337758 �a t1 sass= 1 \ 9, 0.26' 131.00 Lot 15 Lot '�6 Lot 17 Lot 18 14 - o o Lot 19 - Lot 20 'fy 0 0 0 1 0.501 Acres Acres S 0.500 Acres o y � 0.523 Acres N 0.523 Acres S 0.523 Acres N 0.523 Acres o N 0.524 °a�ryp q Lot 25 z Q Lot 2 w = v ° z 2� $ ° z 0.500 A� sH °d8'41'W 110.00' \ 0.526 Acres N89' 59'46"E 1927 4469 59'46 150 N89° 59' 46 "E 149.2 N89° 55 46 'E 149. T N89° 59'4 149.9T N89' 59'46'E 149.9T 102.70 Lot c J LEGEND 155.14' 154.8T 154.BT 154.8T 154.BT 154.8T 12 .81r S89- 59.46 -W 0.525 ACfeS 28,15 f / Z� 31.34' r 103 90' -7 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING Lot 29 _ Lot 25 FS - m .: � ROADWAY CENTERLINE 0.738 Acres � Lot 28 ° r` 26 0 0. 3 Acre ° o + o Lot 27 L 0 Lot 24 Lot 23 0 Lot 22 " '$$,M _ PROPERTY LINE z 0.533 Acres z r 0.533 Acres Z ° 1�9C5331 26 o 7 K = 0.533 Acres S ° 0.533 Acres Z 0.520 Acres / - - LOT LINE �..VV L.� v , ` VVV ° r� - 160.- - - - - - - - - z , 18.31' / ?2=" ' st ss• - 00 I A FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE UTILITY 17000'- - 154.65' �- 154.8T- _._ 154.8T - - - -- -- 154.87' -- - - 154.8T - 154 -BT- - 111.D(r j Ll EASEMENT IS �. 34.72 Lo o Lot 2 F ONTAG S WI H N ALL EACOHLOT FS 8" -tARGf 1-- f 8 "FS 8"FS 8 "FS 8 " o "PS SS{ PS .600 g E S „� ALL OTHER EASEMENTS ARE i 'q,'. Z r' 0. 51 Acres TEN FEET WIDE UNLESS - } _- '"'s OTHERWISE NOTED '- 135.85- 130.00 - 130.00' - - 136.95' - -y - 161.07- - 37.35' 31.48 312 s� 1 31.35' 143.3F 160.00 BPS �� PRESSURE SEWER LINE I - iW FIRE SUPPRESSION LINE a . Lot 1 � � _ : f... E6D - Lot 14 0.576 Acres Lot 8 Lot 7 , Lot - '6 o Lots 4 0.580 Acres -_� -"�` SANITARY SEWER LINE 0:606 Acres 0.507 Acres o ,4.507 Ai1es 0.609 Acres ( v �- aa� CONTOURS Z � Z o , PLACED 518'x 24" IRON ROD 589 °59'46'YY -'" N89 °59'46 "E WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 } 179.94' 181.41' N895946"E 4489 °59'46 "E 4489 °59'46 "E - - __N89 Y "E PLACED t/2" x 24" IRON ROD 15@ 92"-. 130.0, 130.00 155-9z ..{{.. WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 Lot 2 ��� o Lot 13 0.503 Acres .� I w rn ' FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD 3 � � � w w tu° 0.509 Acres 1 m � m 179.54' ( Lot ?1 0 t 2 Lot 9 . Lot 4 FOUND 12" IRON ROD 4489 °59'46 "E � 0.587, °Acres o ° m 0.5 Acres �' 0.500 Acres 'w 0.585 Acres PROPOSED MANHOLE j 589 °59'46"W 8 '�,u(\ J tt 181.80' I 4, -" B L O C .'i _ 2 78.38' / t PROPOSED LIGHT POLE Lot 3 13.60' i s Lot 12 ' Eo 0.500 Acres h �- 106.01 - 130.OT T 130.07' 0493' -� o gar 0.508 Acres PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT 15.53' - 15.55 1O + N PROPOSED FLUSH HYDRANT " FS .. " - t8' S_ �._..$..F 68 ?ssa•W m PROPOSED WATER VALVE 5, SECTION CORNER 136.50- 136.50'- `i- 136.50' 13650' - 6 &.6 66:66 ( 13 60' w o 13.60' °"' °� NL LA/V Lot 4 w °' Lot 7 o r Lot 8 w w s Lot 11 S oN S 0.511 Acres m b, '. 0.512 Acres ti e s7STER p ti^ Lot 5 � Lot 6 0.501 Acres 2 N 61,501 Acres Lot 9 o Lot 10 zO v z , �� �� y o ° a ye 0.503 Acres 0.501 Acres o ° m o 0.501 Acres 0.503 Acres 2Q °�F o 0 0 6 o � o � o v ° •-� BLOCK 1 a 91369 50.OT 210,78' 136.50' 1 136.50' 136.50' 136.50' 2121T 48.38' - \ t( � TF O F 10P' \S J R SHEET 2 OF 4 Schiess & Associates PINE BROOK ESTATES Div. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 Q" ENN'GINEE PLANNING•LMSURVEYING PART OF S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 39 EAST, B.M. FMIS. (208) 522 1244 (2°) &°- -°M2 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF REXBURG, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO -- - -- -- 181.7T - - 31. t7 ` 71 31.8 135.51'.._ 7 15020' 13656' - 128.67 _. 44.02' 326.55' SOU. 0 117.21' 11.43' it 47 J 1 ts v Lot 6 10 24.81' 0.512 Acres �, 4 - Lot 5 " ° Lot 1 }�� M Lot 2 a Lot 3 �� `$ `'s y y'` p Lot 7 "-1 Lot 10 �,`� J Lot 24 ^ ,/ Acres ° a ° 0 0.501 Acres ; Lot A v es sy, 0.623 Acres m 0.725 Acres 0 0 .693 Acres 'O 0 525. Acres ° ° 0.522 Acres 0 00 0.611 Acres �. o < 1.1.41' � z � ° � 0.500 Acres z z3 ss l L O K 5 Z J lot 5 69 to.94 s ��.- -" 0.503 Acres sib 8 9. p8 ' - 41b . q ` - --- 105.4T --_. - --- 1502ff. -__ - _9737 97'70 f i N81 °30'3d'E 7 Cy �F g 39'W N2, °q2 ,6 . - - y79.9f`- t 17239' ?° 3?• a o i - - - 'l 0s s 4oz5. t y6 Lot 9 d Lot 23 �g ar h 0.579 Acres 6 / _. _ Y _ - 8 S 0 0.524 Acres /// Acres', \ °/ 9.01' ,.'-- 59.83' -_- ____ .132.04 - -- - -- -73200 1-- 2921'. -__ _ ^° 40.25' 0.513 Acres 8 ees rm i 41.83' Acres p e 2,? / e y / ' oN P 57A21.0N . 4 1 2968• ///''''��� ,� f/ \�O�S LA F SL, >. 9 w Lot 9 't � 8q'a � ��� 7 7 9 tk5 )Lot 22 s 8 Lot 7 0� 3 7 0.542 Acr� Lot 10 a Lot 1Y g Lot 12 \ '� Lot 37 /� \ 505 Acres 3 H' .v a Lot 8 m° g 0 504 Acres 2 P 050 A .4 cres w 0.520 Acres q� F 0.514 Acres o 3 o s _ v 0.583 Acres s. a N 0.527 Acres may Lot 13 �°+� ,.' - , / / /' 7�'as� o 0.618 Acres 30 6 ?6 .,:. .qt �'. / �[) r{J• / / /' 'G pF \O r ` ?' a m 131.0 131.0 10371' N89° 59' 46 179 69 N89 59' 48�E 137 1' IM9 59' 46'E 132 Od N89° 59' 4TE 132. N86 °35'254h91 .0' e \ X31.08' Lot 21 737.0 �'^, 0.506 Acres / q / / / 28' � 0' 4 131,00' 4 731, 0,04 118.93' N6}1T, �•� ^ryh Lot 14 BLOCK 4 !3 s rw \\F / /. '� � m 7`�2s z3j, 6r 0.534 Acres ° O Lot 24 N Lot 23 -" Lot 22 Lot 21 4 Lot 20 a m Lot 19 S o m � � 13.50' 2 y ' 31.51 / es z 0.500 Acres o p_500 "Acres o 0.500 Acres o Q,500 Acres o 0.500 Acres 0.501 Acres �j Lot 20 ° ,> Is- - -" ° z ; , m Lot 18 , F Lot 15 /" / ff z z f Z ° 0.503 Acres 0 7 oil 0.566 Acres / ,a� / 0.504 Acres f N / v tQ, s / S57 °24'79^E S o, "' ° S ? , s f F W E - 131.00' " -- - 131.00' - -- -- - 131.04 -- - 59.99' - 55.7q•._ ,te °j 1 O.Od S "° 2 °' £ 7 B° 78 F ,8^ _ . �j €'{lc L�(3h1.�F3 FDAFF _ T _� � 3 � 0 500 Acres ' s r9F 7 S _ Lot 17 •� FS 8 FS' S f S v r 8 °FS f ✓� / Lo 19 s� 0.505 Acres I j f - 160.00' - �_ - ' - 160.00 - 160A0 - - 16000 -- Lot 16 / / SS�gO• o o /, 0.528 Acres 'eo o- w w\ / w j Lot Z o ° Lot 3 ° Lot 4 0 = Lot 5 p �9 Lot 18 J / 7 9 31.9r a 0.505 Acres f f 0.551 Acres ,, ° 0 0.551 Acres ° p 0.551 Acres ° 0.551 Acres °° Lot 6 qa N 0.588 Acres o 0.662 �"� \ r / S �z j , o GRAPHIC SCALE Z 10.33' p � \76? �� 'e0 gs fi ry / too o m 10o 200 160.00 160.00' 160.00' 160.00' • ST ` J / ° O' Lot 17 129.67 N89 59' 6 "E 113.6 ^ 1 - 0.505 Acres / / 789.08' 54.21' 35.10' Lot 8 30.6r ry !! f / IN "m ) 12.90' 0.557 Acres / ssy° d 1 inch 100 ft OCK 6 Z O \ Rot 11 ' °t, j �� - 09 es '3 7' +` Lot 16 f , o ro fi ' ` \\� 90 �' ; Lot 10 a Lot 9 / / 0.505 Acres / LEGEND Sv °ti 0.603 Acres o 0.629 Acrf s; t / &6o, ° l / P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING !� PLACED 5/8" x 24" IRON ROD ° z / 7 X 00• ROADWAY CENTERLINE WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 PROPERTY LINE ry / PLACED 1/2" x 24" IRON ROD 40.50 ,� or ��. 1 ' Lot 15 112 oe f LOT LINE WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 75q 6.60' >"``� FOUND 5 /6" IRON ROD N77 °3p, as•W , • 0.633 Acres ; /.' A FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE UTILITY j _ � - - - - - - - EASEMENT IS HEREBY % a - FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD GRANTED ALONG ALL ROAD FRONTAGES WITHIN EACH LOT. PROPOSED MANHOLE ALL OTHER EASEMENTS ARE TEN FEET WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PROPOSED LIGHT POLE \ - uo g .ece. \ Lot 12 w y s / 6 ��s r PRESSURE SEWER LINE t PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT 1.009 Acres o 0.874 Acres Lot 14 13 f, s ,f / ' Po _ems PROPOSED FLUSH HYDRANT 74 3 : f FIRE SUPPRESSION LINE 0.787 Acres SANITARY SEWER LINE m PROPOSED WATER VALVE 3 N N / CONTOURS © SECTION CORNER 162.49 133.08' 123 76' 2 / FIRE SUPPRESSION WELL SHEET 3 OF 4 Schiess & Associates 4o" ENGINEERING- PLANNING-LAND SURVEYING F0" P.M" ") 322 -1244 (2W) 3W -OM :'�� A i woullMimfivi A." PART OF S 1/2 OF THE N 1/2 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 39 EAST, B.M. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF REXBURG, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO GRAPHIC SCALE a 700 0 tm 700 ow IIN F) 1 inch = 900 tt y a �a s .BPS �. P.O.B. S�DNPL LSO SG �G 4JF OF \oP \S J ROMP W��: POINT OF BEGINNING ROADWAY CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE A FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED ALONG ALL ROAD FRONTAGES WITHIN EACH LOT, ALL OTHER EASEMENTS ARE TEN FEET WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESSURE SEWER LINE FIRE SUPPRESSION LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE CONTOURS PLACED 518"x 24" IRON ROD WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 SHEET 4 OF 4 PLACED 1/2" x 24" IRON ROD WITH CAP MARKED P.L.S. 9369 FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD Q� FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD O PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED LIGHT POLE *' PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FLUSH HYDRANT m PROPOSED WATER VALVE 0 SECTION CORNER SHEET 4 OF 4