HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP & DOCS - 07-00307 - Burton Elementary School - CUP0 0
Conditional Use Permit
City of Rexburg
12 North Center Phone: 208.359.3020
Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208.359.3022
OE V.EXBURC
�a �o
v v_
CITY OF
REX
America's Family Community
Applicant
Fee(s) Paid: Yes /No
CUP: $200.00
Publication: $250.00
Name: S RI_k A!5� tATgS t PLLC Address: _1159 Fo,.ID Av,e,
City: , — FS P—q State: Zia! Phone: N J - d
C EWED
Owner (Complete if owner not applicant)
Name: MAn► �.�Gt�on b4S 3ZI Address:
JUL 10 2gg?
C(7
Cit �x a 0 � 351-3300 OF ��x�URG
State: Phone:
Property Covered by Permit:
Address:
Zone: �iaM►� tf.lLGc �L / � S t 4��tTC,E-
Legal Description (Lot, Block, Addition, Division Number)
T� Aot2. CZUAr -T &5i--
oP See - ria4 3S,
To,j,4S,4 t'o tJoZT4 t
12Ar1G -t�
y- uoisc- MERtD1A14
MADtSo,J 6n -WCY
3:DAt10 C&"TPUrI$ 15890
ALILES
Nature of Request (Briefly explain the proposed use)
O.J.5 TZ I)U ;rl0)4 OF #k tAEtJ EL nfk- A8b aldr4- -
Existing use of property:
AH2lGJ LTV ,Z95.
Will this have an impact on schools:
Requirements for Granting Conditional Use Permit -1&1, 1 �4)
The following information will assist the Commission and /or City Council to determine if ropos eet
the requirements under the zoning ordinance.��
1. What is the estimated water usage per month? Are the existing mains adequate to provide fire protection?
5yc.LS -1k MA u-4:5 AR.E AoemG Ama
2. What is the estimated sewer usage per month? Will pretreatment be necessary? ?�,4bo A*Lj f`oR
T AV- C L Ew► '737 ZOO 66 TIC Off-14 SctlOQ_ FIZE-r bji" BF PFovlps I>
3. What is the estimated daily traffic to be generated? Will the traffic be primarily private vehicles or commercial
trucks? X 659 1405 PFi< WE&K 6,e�
( 1 r oa - �� Moot_' "' uALY Piti w
51 6 , `M%PS P¢L LJ9tfr.,Ltt,*( F* EL-r&&M SGelact.' obit PitwKrc
� 'PF-iZ - rrE - T - 2►P G iAw MAgUAL, '7+'► Ebt
4. If commercial, industrial, or a home occupation, what will be the hours of operation? P?_1V -►AP(
QPE ZA'rtonl 15 f ro m 8:6on.o -rd 3 •oo P mn
5. Will storm water drainage be retained on site? Is an existing storm drain available? Is it at capacity? If so, will
new facilities be constructed ? - 5 - r ORA LJA rEK. tin BE oq 517
6. If proposed use is residential, describe number and type of dwelling units. Will this be student housing: multi-
family for young families, singles and couples, or elderly? ?4 /A
7. What provision has been made for fire protection? Where is the nearest fire hydrant? Is any point of the
building further than 150 feet from access sufficient in width for fire fighting equipment?
8. How much parking is being provided on -site? Do the aisle widths and access points comply with the ordinance
requirements? Has landscaping been provided in accordance with the ordinance? �—
inn n rA t. t.5 Fos; - Me 753 5 LLS fog- Tait
9. Where will solid waste generated be stored? Is access adequate for the City collection?
1OA4_14-5 iDC of 3 Ou. Du -4G YE
10. What is the type of noise that will be generated by the use? What are the hours of noise generation?
OA
11. What type of equipment will be used in the conduct of the business? )4
h..
12. What are the surrounding land uses? Has buffering been provided as required by the ordinancJ�
�6nR�c.U�.TuCtA�. 2.tfitD��T1/t�- Ar-li� GovMHeILGaRL f ��yy
13. Are any air quality permits required? Is dirt or other dust creating materials moved by open trucks or box cars?
14. Will the parking lots or other outdoor areas have lighting? YE5
15. Are passenger loading zones for such uses as daycare centers and schools provided? How is busing routed? For
commercial uses, where are the loading docks? Is there sufficient space for truck parking?
oS ZooTifl t AS 3E i> 5(4dfD To M1,41MI 0 TRAff e_ Afwc
16. If a commercial, multi - family, or public assembly use, where is the nearest collector street? Arterial street?
LOSS 74AA '/2 MU-�- , L JA WER517rY &-vD, Arab i2. West
17. What, if any, signage is anticipated in connection with the proposed usage?
1 SP4um C.F.1
The Commission or Council may address other points than those discussed above, but a narrative addressing at
least those applicable points will assist in processing your application. A PLOT PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED IN
ORDER TO PROCESS THIS APPLICATION. Included on the plot plan setbacks, parking, etc.
Formal notice will be se o pplicant fter approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Notice will state the conditions
ermi If con ' 'on are viola d or not met there will be 90 day period to cure the problem. Failure to
compl wi the to s m salt ' revocation of the Conditional Use Permit.
S' ature of p 'cant Date
CITY OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
-. REX City of Rexburg
nneta5 Fwmly commmq Department of Community Development
19 E. Main St. / Rexburg, ID. 83440
Phone (208) 359 -3020 / Fax (208) 359 -3024
Project Information Permit # 0700307
Permit Type Conditional Use Permit Project Name Burton Elementary School - CUP
Site Address 840 S 12TH W Parcel # RPRXBCA0350001
Project Description
Conditions
1. Trash receptacles shall be fully screened from the public right -of -way and should not be visible from adjacent
residential property.
2. There should be no outside storage of material or equipment unless fully screened form public right -of -way. This
screening, if in itself is deemed objectionable by affected property owners, should be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission or designee.
3. A site plan reflecting all conditions of approval and incorporating all City standards, e.g. landscaping, parking, etc.
shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.
4. Commercial lighting standards per the City's development code shall be adhered to.
5. Large equipment that is to be located on the subject property and is to used for heating/cooling/ventilation of the
proposed building(s), or similar uses, shall be located the maximum feasible distance from any adjacent residential
dwelling unit, and shall incorporate any current technology that reduces noise generation.
6. As there will be residential growth occurring to the north, which due to the location of this school will require student
to cross 7th South a collector street, the applicant shall agree to financially participate in future pedestrian safety
improvements (e.g. crosswalks, signals, etc.) across 7th South. The timing and scope of those improvements will be
dictated by the City Engineer. Those improvements would include maintenance financial responsibilities as well.
7. One way to ensure that the development incorporates what the City has established as good architectural and site
design, the proposed building and site shall adhere to the City's design standards or as negotiated with the established
Design Review Committee (DRC). Elements from both the commercial and residential design standards should be
considered.
Print Name �' �'QS� N Date Issued: 08124/2007
Signature Date o 7 Issued By: EMILYA
OF 8� URG
b o
CITY OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REX City of Rexburg
0&
Americas Family Community Department of Community Development
19 E. Main St. / Rexburg, ID. 83440
Phone (208) 359 -3020 / Fax (208) 3 59 -3024
Project Information
Permit Type Conditional Use Permit
Site Address 840 S 12TH W
Project Description
Permit # 0700307
Project Name Burton Elementary School - CUP
Parcel # RPRXBCA0350001
Conditions
8. Pedestrian traffic to the east shall be accommodated by the installation of sidewalks per City standards to the
intersection of 12th West and 7th South. This need only be on the south side of 7th South. Canals shall be covered in
front of the school and canals to the east shall be fenced in to prevent pedestrian accidents from occurring. Design of
safety fencing shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
9. The applicant shall agree to dedicate the right -of -way of the future 13th West. Currently this is proposed to be the
internal driveway serving guest parking.
10. The proposal shall be subject to all recommendations made by the traffic impact study. Installation of
recommendations must occur before occupancy of building occurs.
11. To buffer noise generated by large groups of children, landscape buffers between the school and future areas of
residential uses (those areas currently designated as residential on the Comprehensive Plan map should be
incorporated now to allow for proper maturation.
12. A landscape plan shall be submitted as part of site plan review and building permit review the plan shall address all
areas to be used for the elementary school use as well as areas that are to be disturbed as part of site development.
In addition, the plan shall state a commitment to the City that all areas under the ownership of the school district for
the entire parcel shall be maintained and be kept clear of all nuisances, e.g. illegal trash dumping, noxious weeds, dust,
etc.
13. A culvert ditch shall be put in all the way down from 12th West to the Canal.
Print Name S 1 .4--40PS E
Signature li`""` /`- Date g �
Date Issued: 08/24/2007
Issued By: EMILYA
ut rz 712009 18 :10 City of Rexburg (208) 359 -302 2 (FAX)208 356 3022 P.0021008
January 27, 2009
Rexburg City Building Official
12 North Center Street
Rexburg, ldaho 83440
Re: New Burton
Dear Mr. Christensen:
On behalf of the Madison Schi
December 19, 2008 to Johnny
Elementary School. (See attac
and the contractors to comple
It is my understanding that t
that if the work is not comply
such time as the outstanding
I hope that with this ackr
a timely fashion, and the
i Si cerely,
M,
Dr. eo y omas
Superintend t
ihool
c ol District, I am writing this letter to acknowledge the letter dated
Watson, and the attached list of deficiencies relating to the New Burton
ied) It is the intentioh of the School District to work in concert with 1RW
e the facility as approved, and consistent with these attachments.
facility will be given only a "Temporary Certificate of Occupancy ", and
d on or before July 15, 2009, then the Occupancy will be revoked until
!ms are completed.
;ement on the part of the School District, this matter can be resolved in
can be completed in the manner that was originally agreed upon.
v 166 30�
OF gtx B t)
U C
1/21/09
Johnny Watson
JRW and Associates
1152 Bond Avenue Suite A
Rexburg, ID 83440
Dear Johnny,
C I T Y OF
REX
Americas Family Community
In regards to yesterday's meeting concerning the Burton Elementary School, it
has been determined that you must comply with the requirements outlined in the
December 19, 2008 letter from Gary Leikness. I have attached a copy of that
letter to the back of this document. In order to obtain a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy, we will require a signed letter from yourself and the School District.
The letter must identify that all of the issues identified will be completed prior to
July 15 ", 2009.
Let me know if you have additional questions. I can be reached by my office
phone, 359 -3020 ext. 324, my cell at 716 -1324 or by email at valc _rexburg.org
Sincerely,
Val Christensen
Community Development Director
Val Christensen Community Development Director 19 E. Main Bexbu% ID 83440 P. O. Box 280
Phone (208) 359 3020 ext. 324 Fax (208) 35.9 3022
- M@_rrxburg mg nm ,rxbuq org
°Q XBUA
CITY OF
REX
CW
'• N •
Americas Ramily Community
December 19, 2008
C .
Mr. Johnny Watson
1152 Bond Avenue
Rexburg, Id 83440
Re: Burton Elementary, Design Standards Review (Permit #07 00367)
Dear Mr. Watson:
Thank you for meeting with the Community Development Department on Dec. 1, 2008.
Hopefully the meeting was useful for you by being able to sit down with all City inspectors
and discuss final inspection findings for the Burton Elementary, soon to open for operation.
During that meeting I offered information regarding my final inspection, which included a
report on the architectural design standards that the school proposal was required to go
through. It was determined that at the time of the meeting, there were items of the site and
the building design that needed to be addressed in order for Planning and Zoning to sign a
final Certificate of Occupancy (COfO). I distributed this list to you and others that were
present at the Dec 1 meeting. I also put a copy in the City file.
!,
After this meeting, I reported back to the Design Review Committee (Dec 11, 2008), to let
them know how the final inspection for P &Z went. The committee looked at what was
proposed by your group and approved by the City. I took pictures of the building as it
currently stands to help them understand what items were not addressed. They determined
that the elements that were agreed upon through the Conditional Use Permit process, the
site plan review process, landscape plan review process, and the architectural design review
process need to be upheld. However, they were okay with the west side of the building not
having the required 10 -foot landscape strip that was approved on the submitted site plan and
landscape plan. Please see the attached list for all outstanding issues related to the Planning
and Zoning final inspection.
Gary Leikmess Planning and Zoning Administrator 19 E. Main Rexburg ID 83440 P. O. Box 280
Phone (208) 359 3020 ext. 314 Fax (208) 359 3022
garyl @rrxb#q org wam —b-T oq
I will promptly sign a CofO once the identified issues have been addressed. If some items
must wait until spring due to weather, such as landscaping, we will be able to sign a
Temporary CofO, which will allow you to address some items at a later date, but still allow
use of the site for the intended school.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need clarification.
Gary Leikne
Planning & Zoning Administrator
Enclosure: P &Z review notes
CC: Geoffrey Thomas
Shawn Larsen
Winston Dyer
Gary Leilmess Planning and Zoning Administrator 19 E Main Rexburg M 83440 P. 0. Bax280
Phone (208) 359.3020 ext. 314 Fax (208) 359.3022
pg1 @,rxbargorg — re- burg.org
f
Gary Leikness
From:
Gary Leikness
Sent:
Monday, December 01, 20083:00 PM
To:
JaNell Hansen; Val Christensen
Cc:
Winston R. Dyer
Subject:
Burton Elementary P &Z final inspection
JaNell,
The following items are those that need to be addressed prior to a full certificate of occupancy being issued for the
Burton Elementary School:
1) North wall is not constructed according to the agreement made between Design Review Committee (DRC) and
applicant /agent.
2) North Wall does not have the glass windows in the place as agreed upon with DRC. See approved building
elevations for design that was to be adhered to.
3) North wall does not include vertical brick elements as agreed upon with the DRC. See approved building
elevations for design that was to be adhered to.
4) North wall does not screen roof top mechanical equipment.
5) No landscaping has been installed per approved landscape plan.
6) Dumpster location on north side of building needs to be screened with landscaping as well as material.
7) No irrigation plan was submitted. We still need to see how plants are to be irrigated and how areas outside of
immediate school vicinity will be maintained.
8) The 10 -foot required landscape strip along walls not present. This was a negotiation point for the DRC, more
landscaping, less worry about a long wall facing the public right -of -way. Landscaping, vertical brick elements,
and glass windows were to be installed to buffer the long tall wall facing the public street (right -of- way)..
9) Deceleration striping along front of property to discourage diagonal parking.
10) Is the ADA access from public right -of -way to building too steep? It appears so.
11) ADA parking spaces in visitor parking lot have been de- striped. Where are the spaces going to be, and where are
the ADA ramps to accommodate the spaces?
12) Doors along north wall should have windows in them rather than solid doors. This windows were shown on the
approved building elevations.
These are my preliminary notes, 'I have not yet spoken to the'DRC yet on this.
Gary
Gary Leikness
P &Z Administrator
19 E Main
PO Box 280
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
E -mail- garyl @rexburiz.org
Phone- (208)359 -3020 Ext. 314
D E C Eud
NOV -1 2007
CITY OF REXBI
07 00365 & 07 00367
Burton Elementary School
30, 2007 Revisions 11/1/2007
Main St.
Rexburg, ID. 83440
Re: Plan Review Response for Burton Elementary School, Permit # 07 00367
I have attached your original comments, with our response in italics. The responses as noted will be
incorporated into the contract documents. Should you have any further concerns or questions, please
do no hesitate to contact me.
Planning Department Review
Site Plan Review
Item #1 — A landscape plan is needed for all the areas under ownership.
Please submit a landscape plan that includes an irrigation plan.
The previously submitted and the modified attached show the landscape for the portion
of land that is being developed under the project.
This property is being irrigated with surface water from the canal company as directed
by City engineering. So no connection to the city potable water system is needed for the
irrigation.
Item #2 — Please provide trash enclosure details. Trash receptacles must be fully screened from the
right -of -way using materials similar to those on the building facades. Screening materials
for the dumpsters must be similar to materials used in the building fagade itself, or
landscaping (trees, shrubs, etc) must be provided to block the proposed chain link
screening. Please see revised attached landscaping plan that provides plant screening in
addition to the chain link fence with vision slats.
Item #3 — Please provide a lighting plan with photometric layout information. Lighting standards
limit the height of parking area lights to 25 feet. Proposed lights are 32 feet high. Also,
any building mounted lights must be full cut -off. See attached photometric layout
reflecting 25 foot tall fixtures. All specified fixtures are cut -off dark sky compliant.
Please move the three light poles along the east property line, since their proposed
location will be in the future right -of way for the future road. Due to safety and security
concerns, the Owner has elected to keep the fixtures at the current locations. The
current locations provide important lighting at the access drives that allows patrons
to see as they entire onto the property and parking lot. When and if this becomes a
City road, the fixtures in question will be relocated. If the City is willing to accept the
potential liability in writing then the Owner will agree to the relocation.
The lights along the north property line must be treated to prevent direct illumination of
the right -of -way. The ordinance reads: "All light fixtures, including security lighting,
shall be aimed and shielded so that the direct illumination shall be confined to the
property boundaries of the light source. Care shall be taken to assure that the direct
illumination does not fall onto or across any public or private street or road. Freestanding
luminaries that are closer to the property boundary than 3 times the height of the lamp
above grade shall use an asymmetrical light distribution or shall be fitted with a cutoff
shield (also know as house -side shields) such that the illuminance at the property
boundary is less than 1/20 of the maximum from said luminaire." Please revise. The
fixtures in question will be moved (as indicated on attached photometric drawing),
south 15 feet further away from the property line. In reviewing the City ordinance
above, it is assumable by the action of the City prohibiting any illumination to fall
onto the public right -of -way, that the City is thereby assuming any safety related
liability.
Commercial New Construction Over 2 million
Item #1 — Since the North fagade of the gymnasium area faces the street, elements to visually break
up the fagade are required. The Design Review Committee suggests incorporating the
same columns and glass windows from the East and West gymnasium fagade onto the
North Gymnasium fagade. Please see attached drawing showing the addition of piers
and entry canopy. Please note that behind this wall is a mechanical room and walk -in
cooler /freeze, both of which required use of the exterior wall space thereby prohibiting
the addition of windows. Keep in mind that the design ordinance only required a 6-foot
planter between the building and walk. As requested we have provided a 10 foot planter
with evergreen trees to help visually break up the elevation.
Item #2 — All outside equipment for cooling, etc. must be fully screened by incorporating it into the
design of the building. We are concerned with the equipment on the roof at the North end of
the building. The cooling tower must be screened as required by ordinance. Please show
this on revised elevation drawings. See attached revised exterior elevations.
I trust that this resolves any outstanding questions or concerns that the City may have regarding this
project.
Sincerely,
Brent A. McFarland, A.I.A.
mill I Mill 11
oil
SCORIEMCMr-
MCCOMMON"
ISM
W" %
UP
J_
.'ir 0We:=r. rune
;mrnpi nr i,,)
I y5
,9 '2i
07 00365 & 07 00367
Burton Elementary School
February 11 2008 Revisions 2/11/2008
City of Rexburg
19 E. Main St.
Rexburg, ID. 83440
Re: Plan Review Response for Burton Elementary School, Permit # 07 00365
I received your comments dated February 8, 2008. Many of the comments have been addressed in a previous response
dated October 30, 2007. The items below our in response to the February 8, 2008 comments.
Planning Department Review
\ Site Plan Review
"Item #1 & 2 - Please provide a lighting plan with photometric layout information. Lighting standards limit the height of
parking area lights to 225 feet. Proposed lights are 32 feet high. Also, any building mounted lights must be
full cut-off See attached photometric layout reflecting 25 foot tall fixtures. All specified fixtures (both
pole mounted and building mounted) are cut -off dark sky compliant
Item #3 - Please move the three light poles along the east property line, since their proposed location will be in the
future right -of way for the future road. Due to safety and security concerns, the Owner has elected to
keep the fixtures at the current locations. When and if this becomes a City road, the fixtures in question
will be relocated If the City is willing to accept the potential liability in writing then the Owner will agree
to the relocation at this time.
Item #4 -The lights along the north property line must be treated to prevent direct illumination of the right -of -way. The
ordinance reads: "All light fixtures, including security lighting, shall be aimed and shielded so that the
direct illumination shall be confined to the property boundaries of the light source. Care shall be taken to
assure that the direct illumination does not fall onto or across any public or private street or road. Freestanding
illuminaries that are closer to the property boundary than 3 times the height of the lamp above grade shall use
an asymmetrical light distribution or shall be fitted with a cutoff shield (also know as house -side shields) such
that the illuminance at the property boundary is less than 1/20 of the maximum from said luminaire." Please
revise. The fixtures in question will be moved (as indicated on attached photometric drawing), south 15-feet
further away from the property line. In reviewing the City ordinance above, it is assumable by the action of
the City prohibiting any illumination to fall onto the public right -of -way, that the City is thereby assuming
any safety related liability. N�,oj,r O��D �F USED 7� L_ r 14)d^_' L)6 24P�6 .5
Item #5 - Are you proposing high pressure sodium as inquired? As indicated on the construction documents
a#6- itted, the pole and exterior wall mounted fixtures are high pressure sodium.
Itat type of irrigation is being proposed for landscaped areas? Please submit plan, details, eg. Sprinkler
m. The landscaped area is being irrigated with the irrigation water rights and not City water. The
Q b ?`k irrigation plan is being finalized and will not be ready for a month or more. Based on my review of the City
of Rexburg Development Code, I could not find that a building permit is contingent on the submittal of a
landscape irrigation plan. Nor do I believe that it falls within the City's jurisdiction as irrigation water is
being used
I trust that this resolves any outstanding questions or concerns that the City may have
Sincerely,
FEB 1 1 2008
Brent A. McFarland, A.I.A.
CITYOF REBURG
r cs
I
��;�fii�ii�•�■�■�i�iiira
` tp�E�
A
e bs
a
1.6
)'S
BURTON
ELEMENTARY 5G-IOOL
� EC�IifE �r
2 008
( 50
.7 1 1.6 9.5 7.7 h.9 7.a b
SIA 2.t 7 h.5 1.5 b
b. a ti. tis 9A 1.2 b
If .7 1.e h.� `I.a ti, b.s b.s
FI6A
ti 9 ti US b.s b
ti 12 b,
It i .6 9.5 '1.6 `I.9 IJ 1 2A `IA U
.5 h.t h.o h.9 1 h.s 1 b
A
S YUA s 1 b.
A j ti bs b
b b.6 b s b s b.9 to b 5 b,4 b.s
CAL �� A ��
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
J
R wX
<,.
ASSOCIATES
Architecture & Interior Design
1152 Bond Avenue Suite A
Rexburg,Idaho 83440
Phone (208) 359 -2309
Fax (208) 359 -2271
TO: CITY OF REXBURG
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
■ Attached
O Shop Drawings
0 Specifications
O Under separate cover via
O Prints
0 Copy of letter
DATE: 2 -11 -2008 JOB NO: 375
Y LEiKNEss
RE:
BURTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
I D, """ LF,�,1 2008 U
TY OF REXBURG
O Plans
0 Change Order
the following items:
O Samples
0 Submittals
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 SITE PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
■
For approval
0 Approved as submitted
0
Approved as noted 0 As requested
0
Returned for corrections 0 For review and comment
0
For your use 0 Other
0
Resubmit
copies for approval
0
For signature
0
Return
corrected prints
0
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
0
Submit
copies for distribution
0
FOR BIDS DUE 20
REMARKS:
SIGNED:
E
•
Staff Report
Burton Elementary School
CUP
• •
Planning and Zoning Department �FxcBURC,�
STAFF REPORT
12 North Center garyl @rexburg.org Phone: 208.359.3020 x314
Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208.359.3024
C1 T Y OF
REXBURG
Americas Family Conimuni2y
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit, file # 07 00307
APPLICANT: JRW & Associates
1152 Bond Avenue
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
PROPERTY OWNER: Madison School District 321
290 North 1 East
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
PURPOSE: Request to construct a new Elementary School and High School.
PROPERTY LOCATION: 12 West & 7` South
Rexburg, ID 83440
PROPERTY ID: RPRXBCA0350001
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low - Moderate Residential Density
ZONING DISTRICT: Transitional Agriculture 1 (TAG1)
APPLICABLE CRITERIA: City of Rexburg Development Code (Ordinance Code 926)
§ 6.13 Conditional Use Permits
AUTHORITY § 6.13 (F) (7) "All other conditional use permits may only be granted after
review and recommendation by the Commission and approval by the City
Council... "
I. BACKGROUND
The applicant has requested a conditional use permit to allow construction and operation of a high
school and elementary school on the same larger parcel, but in different locations within the parcel.
After reviewing the proposal and working with the applicant, it was determined that the hearing of
the high school portion of the property should wait until a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is completed.
This analysis is underway but was not ready at the time of this first hearing. Therefore, this staff
report will only address the proposed elementary school and how it relates to the criteria established
for conditional use permits. The Commission should only consider the elementary portion of this
proposal at this time and make a recommendation to the City Council on only the elementary school.
Case No. 07 00307 Page 1
•
•
The Commission should, in consulting with the applicant, set a date certain at which the public
hearing for the proposed high school will be heard. Staff recommends 60 days or less.
Land uses that require conditional use permits are allowed within a zone if, through reasonable
conditions of approval, the use and/or facility will not adversely impact the neighborhood and
community of which it belongs. Therefore, the City, upon receipt of a CUP request, should review
the proposal and either approve, deny, or approve with conditions.
II. SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a 6,882,695 square foot (158 -acre) parcel located on the west side of Rexburg
generally the northwest corner of University Boulevard and S 12 West. The proposed area
designated for use as the elementary school includes approximately 12 -acres of land directly adjacent
to W 7 th South (future collector street).
The surrounding neighborhood is predominantly agricultural use with some single family homes in
the area, particularly to the east (Willowbrook Subdivision).
III. ANALYSIS
The following are the criteria for granting a conditional use permit. Some of the criteria is followed
by staff's analysis. A conditional use will:
a. Constitute a conditional use as established in Table], Zoning Districts, and Table 2, Land Use
Schedule.
The proposed use is listed as a conditionally permitted use under Section 3.28.020(F) of the
Development Code; therefore, this criterion is met.
b. Be in accordance with a specific or general objective of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the
regulations of this Ordinance.
The City's adopted comprehensive plan, Rexburg: 2010 lists as an Action Step under the
Transportation and Circulation section, "Make it easier and safer for people to travel by foot or
by bicycle by developing bike paths, lanes, and routes which connect residential neighborhoods,
schools, and employment. Generally, elementary schools should be located on local roads that
are intended for residential traffic. This reduces the amount of potential vehicle /pedestrian
conflicts that might occur at a higher frequency on a collector and arterial street. Given that this
location is currently intended to serve a more rural student body, the Commission may determine
that this criterion is met when considering all factors.
However, it is likely that this southwest area of the City is likely to grow in both residential and
commercial land uses. As a result, steps should be taken now to ensure that the development will
transition with growth. The applicant has begun to address this with observing required rights -of-
way and extending sidewalks in front of the school on 7 th South. Staff would recommend the
sidewalk construction and right -of -way dedication be extended to the east to 12 West. At 12
West, the intersection should be improved to allow for adequate turn lanes and sidewalks with
handicapped accessible ramps. As there is likely to be residential growth occurring to the north, a
condition of approval may be that the applicant must agree to financiallz participate in future
pedestrian safety improvements (e.g. crosswalks, signals, etc.) across 7 South. The timing and
scope of those improvements will be dictated by the City Engineer. Those improvements would
include maintenance responsibilities as well. In addition any recommendations put forward by
the traffic impact study should be adhered to.
Case No. 07 00307 Page 2
•
c. Be designed and constructed in a manner to be harmonious with the existing character of the
neighborhood and the zone in which the property is located.
The surrounding land uses include single - family homes and mostly agricultural land. In many
ways, the new building and site might establish the ambiance of future development in the area.
The City has architectural design standards for buildings. One way to ensure that the
development incorporates what the City has established as good architectural and site design, a
condition of approval could be that the proposed building and site adhere to the City's design
standards or as negotiated with the established Design Review Committee (DRC). Elements from
both the commercial and residential design standards should be considered. Being subject to the
City's architectural design standards will ensure that the site will be built more to a
pedestrian/neighborhood scale by requiring large expanses of walls and rooflines to be
architecturally "broken up," for example. As conditioned, this criterion is met
d. Not create a nuisance or safety hazard for neighboring properties in terms of excessive noise
or vibration, improperly directed glare or heat, electrical interference, odors, dust or air
pollutants, solid waste generation and storage, hazardous materials or waste, excessive traffic
generation, or interference with pedestrian traffic.
Regarding glare and heat, the City's established lighting standards should be adhered to.
Regarding electrical interference, no impacts are foreseeable. Regarding dust and air pollutants,
the City has nuisance laws that should be adhered to. In addition, during development of the site
(site disturbance), blowing dust should be minimized through dust control measures, such as
establishing a vegetative cover after site disturbance, mulching, irrigation, or organic spray -on
adhesives, where appropriate. Should dust generated from the site become a problem for the
adjacent properties, a dust control plan should be submitted immediately to the City Engineer for
review and approval. After the site has been developed, all disturbed areas should be re- vegetated
within 21 -days, or as weather permits.
Regarding the potential impacts of noise and vibration, the commission should explore this issue
and determine if reasonable conditions of approval need to be applied.
Regarding solid waste generation and storage, trash receptacles should be fully screened from the
public right -of -way and should not be visible from adjacent residential property. There should be
no outside storage of material or equipment unless fully screened form public right -of -way. This
screening, if in it self is deemed objectionable by affected property owners, should be approved
by the Planning Commission or designee. Staff has included proposed conditions of approval that
address trash storage and general storage occurring on the outside of the building.
Regarding excessive traffic generation, or interference with pedestrian traffic, the applicant is in
the process of completing a TIS to determine levels of service for adjacent roads and affected
intersections. In anticipation of traffic generation and potential impacts, the applicant is
proposing improvements at the site including acceleration and deceleration lanes. The anticipated
TIS will provide improvement recommendations; a proposed condition of approval is that these
recommendations be adhered to. In order to avoid pedestrians heading to the east, the previously
mentioned improvements to sidewalks to the east should be adhered to. Canal safety for
pedestrians along designated routes should be explored with the applicant.
The Commission should determine if through reasonable conditions of approval this criterion can
be met.
Case No. 07 00307 Page 3
• 9
e. Be adequately served by essential public facilities and services such as access streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer service, and schools.
If existing facilities are not adequate, the developer shall show that such facilities shall be
upgraded sufficiently to serve the proposed use.
The subject property is located within the City limits and is therefore served by essential services
other than water and sewer service. Water and sewer infrastructure will be extended from 12
West at the applicant's expense; the City will maintain the lines once installed and inspected.
Based on existing and proposed public services being provided, this criterion is met. In addition,
site development will undergo review by the public works department to ensure all required city
services and utilities are supplied.
f. Not generate traffic in excess of the capacity of public streets or access points serving the
proposed use and will assure adequate visibility at traffic access points.
Staff is not able to determine this at this time. A traffic impact study is being completed which
describe current and projected road conditions and levels of service. The study will include
recommendations for road improvements that will enable the school to occupy its proposed
location. The school is proposing acceleration and deceleration lanes immediately in front of the
school site. These lanes will prevent school traffic from interfering with through traffic on 7th
South.
The site also includes a internal driveway that is configured and aligned with the future 13 West
road. It is recommended that the road right -of -way be dedicated at this time, or a time certain,
with an agreement that the internal driveway be maintained by the school district until the road
develops and functions as a pubic road (see conditions of approval).
Staff recommends requiring the proposal to be subject to all recommendations made by the
traffic impact study. This has been made a proposed condition of approval.
The commission should explore this criterion to determine if it is met, or can be through
reasonable conditions of approval.
g. Be effectively buffered to screen adjoining properties from adverse impacts of noise, building
size and resulting shadow, traffic, and parking.
Regarding noise, the hours of operation will be typical to most elementary schools, in that peak
occupancy will occur during fall, winter, and spring days. There will be some evening gatheraing
as well as potentially meetings for community use. Most noise will be generated during the day
with children playing, vehicles coming and going, and mechanical equipment. Large heating and
cooling equipment will likely be used which will generate noise. The Commission may want to
condition the use such that equipment that will generate noise be located a maximum feasible
distance from existing and future residential uses surrounding the property. The applicant should
be encouraged to incorporate large heating/cooling /ventilation equipment that uses technology
that reduces noise impacts. Noise generated by large groups of children will be mostly generated
in the rear of the building. Landscape buffers between school and future areas of residential uses
should be incorporated now to allow for proper maturation (see proposed conditions of approval).
A landscape plan will need to be submitted as part of site plan review and building permit review
(see proposed condition of approval).
The proposed buildings should be consistent with other new buildings in the City. Specifically,
the City has incorporated architectural design standards that are intended to increase the
aesthetics of the City as well as create more human scale buildings and environements. This
Case No. 07 00307 Page 4
• 9
building and all accessory buildings should be subject to the commercial and residential design
standards. The Design Review Committee should explore the design and negotiate with the
designer a building that most closely meets the intent of the design standards (see conditions of
approval). The proposed structure and site being subject to the City's architectural design
standards should negate and potential building size impacts.
The City requires minimum setbacks and screening for parking areas. These requirements will be
reviewed during the site plan/landscape plan review phase when the applicant submits a building
permit application. The Commission should point out any significant areas of concern for staff to
follow up with during the site plan review phase.
The Commission should determine if the proposal as proposed, or with conditions satisfies this
criterion.
h. Be compatible with the slope of the site and the capacity of the soils and will not be in an area
of natural hazards unless suitably designed to protect lives and property.
Not applicable
i. Not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a historic feature of significance to the
community of Rexburg.
Not applicable
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission take public testimony and determine if the proposed
conditional use permit can be approved, denied, or approved with conditions. Staff has proposed
some conditions of approval, should the Commission choose to approve with conditions.
Proposed Conditions of Approval
1. Trash receptacles shall be fully screened from the public right -of -way and should not be visible from
adjacent residential property.
2. There should be no outside storage of material or equipment unless fully screened form public right -
of -way. This screening, if in it self is deemed objectionable by affected property owners, should be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission or designee.
3. A site plan reflecting all conditions of approval and incorporating all City standards, e.g. landscaping,
parking, etc. shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.
4. Commercial lighting standards per the City's development code shall be adhered to.
5. Large equipment that is to be located on the subject property and is to used for
heating/cooling /ventilation of the proposed building(s), or similar uses, shall be located the maximum
feasible distance from any adjacent residential dwelling unit, and shall incorporate any current
technology that reduces noise generation.
6. As there will be residential growth occurring to the north, which due to the location of this school
will require student to cross 7 South a collector street, the applicant shall agree to financially
participate in future pedestrian safety improvements (e.g. crosswalks, signals, etc.) across 7 South.
The timing and scope of those improvements will be dictated by the City Engineer. Those
improvements would include maintenance financial responsibilities as well.
7. One way to ensure that the development incorporates what the City has established as good
architectural and site design, the proposed building and site shall adhere to the City's design standards
Case No. 07 00307 Page 5
• !
or as negotiated with the established Design Review Committee (DRC). Elements from both the
commercial and residential design standards should be considered.
8. Pedestrian traffic to the east shall be accommodated by the installation of sidewalks per City
standards to the intersection of 12 West and 7 South. This need only be on the south side of 7th
South. Canals shall be covered in front of the school and canals to the east shall be fenced in to
prevent pedestrian accidents from occurring. Design of safety fencing shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer.
9. The applicant shall agree to dedicate the right -of -way of the future 13 West. Currently this is
proposed to be the internal driveway serving guest parking.
10. The proposal shall be subject to all recommendations made by the traffic impact study.
Installation of recommendations must occur before occupancy of building occurs.
11. To buffer noise generated by large groups of children, landscape buffers between the school and
future areas of residential uses (those areas currently designated as residential on the Comprehensive
Plan map should be incorporated now to allow for proper maturation
12. A landscape plan shall be submitted as part of site plan review and building permit review the
plan shall address all areas to be used for the elementary school use as well as areas that are to be
disturbed as part of site development. In addition, the plan shall state a commitment to the City that
all areas under the ownership of the school district for the entire parcel shall be maintained and be
kept clear of all nuisances, e.g. illegal trash dumping, noxious weeds, dust, etc.
Case No. 07 00307 Page 6
V gLXet;
CITY O F
RE XBURG
-- 0.v -- --
America's Fwr ily Community
P.O Box 280
19 E. Main St.
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
Phone (208) 359 -3020
Review Action Fax (208) 359 -3022
August 2, 2007
Permit Number: 07 00307
Project Name: Madison High /Burton Elementary Schools - CUP
Project Type: Conditional Use Permit
Review Item Actions Required for Approval Approved
Public, Works Review ".
Public Works Review 1. 7the south at the intersection of 12th west
will need to be widened to allow for a turning
lane.
2. 12th west will also need to be widen to
provide for a turning lane for north bound traffic,
at a minimum.
3. Storm drainage facilities for the site are not
shown on the site plan. All storm drainage will
be the responsibility of the school district.
4. The area that is to be in grass will need to be
irrigated with the existing surface water system.
5. A lighting plan will need to be developed for
the site.
6. The area shown as a double dashed line on
the east side of the school is for a proposed
future road. As the remanent property is
developed this area may need to be dedicated
to the city and developed as a city street.
7. The existing irregation ditches along the
north side of the property will need to be
relocated and piped, as shown on the site plan.
Parcel #'s RPRXBCA0350001
gVAB
Findings of Fact QQ 8�a� c 1 T Y OF
City of Rexburg U c E BURG
12 North Center Phone: 208.359.3020 `'' Ame'-icaa F 4mzlyCommunity
Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208.359.3022
7" South and 12 West — Burton Elementary School
Conditional Use Permit
1. On July 10, 2007, JRW & Associates presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning
Coordinator a Request and Application for a Conditional Use Permit for an elementary
School located at 7 South and 12` West.
2. On July 11, 2007, the City Clerk sent the Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the
local newspaper for July 17, 2007, and July 28, 2007. A notice was posted on the property
and sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the above mentioned property.
3. On August 2, 2007, Johnny Watson presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission for
the City of Rexburg the Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an elementary school
located at 7` South and 12` West.
Mary Ann Mounts motioned to recommend to City Council approval of the Conditional
Use Permit for the Burton Elementary School with the conditions listed in the staff report
(see below). Mary Haley seconded the motion. None opposed. Motion carried.
Proposed Conditions ofApprovah
1. Trash receptacles shall be fully screened from the public right -of -way and should not be visible
from adjacent residential property.
2. There should be no outside storage of material or equipment unless fully screened form public
right -of -way. This screening, if in itself is deemed objectionable by affected property owners,
should be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission or designee.
3. A site plan reflecting all conditions of approval and incorporating all City standards, e.g.
landscaping, parking, etc. shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
4. Commercial lighting standards per the City's development code shall be adhered to.
5. Large equipment that is to be located on the subject property and is to used for
heating /cooling /ventilation of the proposed building(s), or similar uses, shall be located the
maximum feasible distance from any adjacent residential dwelling unit, and shall incorporate any
current technology that reduces noise generation.
6. As there will be residential growth occurring to the north, which due to the location of this
school will require student to cross 7th South a collector street, the applicant shall agree to
financially participate in future pedestrian safety improvements (e.g. crosswalks, signals, etc.)
across 7th South. The timing and scope of those improvements will be dictated by the City
Engineer. Those improvements would include maintenance financial responsibilities as well.
7. One way to ensure that the development incorporates what the City has established as good
architectural and site design, the proposed building and site shall adhere to the City's design
standards or as negotiated with the established Design Review Committee (DRC). Elements
from both the commercial and residential design standards should be considered.
0 0
8. Pedestrian traffic to the east shall be accommodated by the installation of sidewalks per City
standards to the intersection of 12th West and 7th South. This need only be on the south side of
7th South. Canals shall be covered in front of the school and canals to the east shall be fenced in
to prevent pedestrian accidents from occurring. Design of safety fencing shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
9. The applicant shall agree to dedicate the right -of -way of the future 13th West. Currently this is
proposed to be the internal driveway serving guest parking.
10. The proposal shall be subject to all recommendations made by the traffic impact study.
Installation of recommendations must occur before occupancy of building occurs.
11. To buffer noise generated by large groups of children, landscape buffers between the school
and future areas of residential uses (those areas currently designated as residential on the
Comprehensive Plan map should be incorporated now to allow for proper maturation
12. A landscape plan shall be submitted as part of site plan review and building permit review the
plan shall address all areas to be used for the elementary school use as well as areas that are to
be disturbed as part of site development. In addition, the plan shall state a commitment to the
City that all areas under the ownership of the school district for the entire parcel shall be
maintained and be kept clear of all nuisances, e.g. illegal trash dumping, noxious weeds, dust,
etc.
4. On August 15, 2007 John Watson of JRW & Associates reviewed the proposal on the
overhead screen. This Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is for the Burton Elementary School
on 12t West and 7 th South. They are doing a traffic study on the site before coming forward
with the CUP request for the new high school. Keller and Associates along with Winston
Dyer and John Millar will work on traffic plans. Currently, the property the school is on is
zoned as TAG 1 which requires a CUP. The school district recommends having schools on
at least 15 acres. Burton Elementary is on 13 acres.
Council Member Young asked if it is required to have schools on at least 15 acres. John
Watson explained this is just recommended, the school district is okay with the 13 acres
Burton Elementary is currently on.
Council Member Erickson asked if 12 West and 7 th South the school could culvert all the
way to the end of the property for pedestrian safety. Children will be walking from the east
and north to the school. A fence around the ditch will be a trash catcher. JRW concurred
with the need to culvert all the ditches around the school area. The Planning and Zoning
conditions are agreeable to the owner.
Council Member Erickson moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Burton
Elementary with the condition outlined by city staff and with the condition a culver ditch is
put in all the way down from 12t West to the Canal. Council Member Schwendiman
seconded the motion; all voted aye, none opposed. The motion carried.
0 0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that a Public Hearing will be held before the Planning & Zoning
Commission of the City of Rexburg, Idaho, Thursday, August 02, 2007, at 7:45 p.m., in the City
Council Chambers of the City Building at 12 North Center, Rexburg, Idaho, regarding a Conditional
Use Permit (07 00307) for a High School and an Elementary School for the Madison School
District. The property is located on 12th West south of 7th South, Rexburg, Idaho. The property is
currently zoned Transitional Agricultural One (TAG1).
The city code governing this request is ORDINANCE No. 926
"DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF REXBURG, IDAHO"
(ADOPTED FEBRUARY 16th, 2005) and Amended 7/06/2005; 5/07/2007; 7/03/2007
The said parcels were annexed into the City of Rexburg June 21, 2006 and the parcels are located on
property west of 12 West and South of 7th South in Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, and more
particularly described as follows:
The Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 6 North, Range 39 East, Boise Meridian, Madison
County, Idaho.
At such hearing the Planning & Zoning Commission will hear all persons and all objections and
recommendations relative to such proposed permit. The City Clerk will also accept written
comments at City Hall prior to 4:00 p.m. on August 01st, 2007.
This notice is given pursuant to the provisions of Section 67 -6509 and 67 -6511 Idaho Code, and all
amendments thereof.
DATED this 11th day of July, 2007.
CITY OF REXBURG
B
Blair D. Kay, City Clerk
Published: July 17 2007
July 28th, 2007
c
ASSOCIATES
Architecture &
Interior Design
Phone (208) 359 -2309
Fax (208) 359 -2271
1152 Bond Avenue
Suite A
Rexburg, ID 83440
www.i rwa. c o m
i s 0
July 31, 2007
Gary Leikness
Rexburg Planning & Zoning Administrator
19 East Main
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
RE: Burton Elementary C.U.P.
Dear Gary,
The following is a narrative describing the proposed Burton Elementary site's compliance
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Development Code.
Criteria #I The City of Rexburg Development Code Section 3.28.020 Permitted Uses
lists schools as a permitted use in the Tag Zone only after a Conditional Use
permit has been issued.
Criteria #2 The City of Rexburg "Vision 2020" Comprehensive Plan lists the primary
locations for residential development are to the South and West. Although
the new Burton Elementary is needed for an existing population, the new
site will serve the proposed development west of Highway 20. Originally, a
proposal to locate the elementary school on the corner of 7 South and 12t
West was considered. But according to the comprehensive plan, elementary
schools are to be located one or two blocks from arterial streets (12 West)
on local streets (7 South). The current proposed location allows the
elementary school to mesh into the future residential growth.
Criteria #3 The design of the elementary school is compliant with the city's design
standards. The parking areas are broken into smaller lots and screened with
vegetation.
Criteria #4 Proposed use complies with Rexburg's Nuisance and Safety Hazard
ordinances. An elementary school creates minimal traffic impact based on
the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The projected trip generation rates are
compatible with local streets.
Qualifications Certified By: N.C.A.R.B. - National Council of Architectural Registration Boards
0 0
Criteria #5 All utilities will be extended from 12" West to the project site. The existing
infrastructure is sufficient for the new facility's needs. The public work
department will dictate what size of lines are actually extended east. The
school requires a 4" sanitary sewer and a 6" water supply.
Criteria #6 See Criteria #4. It is critical for user safety for all access points to maintain
good visibility.
Criteria #7 Currently all adjoining properties are agricultural in nature. The site design
incorporates the required setbacks, screening and etc. for the future
residential growth.
Criteria #8 Site is flat
Criteria #9 N/A
Sincerely,
ohnny R. W
•
LAND USE
•
APPENDIX C
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIP
GENERATION RATE
60 /acre, 100 /flight, 70/1000 sq, ft.
6 /acre, 2 /flig 6/ based aircraft
900 /site, 600 1acre
100 /wash stall
50/1000 sq. ft., 500 /acre
80/1000 sq. ft., 700 /acre
12011000 sq. ft., 1200 /acre
40/1000 sq, ft., 400 1acre
150/1000 sq, ft., 2000 /acre
500/1000 sq. ft.
700/1000 sq. ft.
60/1000 sq, ft., 800 /acre
60 /1000 sq, ft., 600 /acre
11000 sq, ft., 100 /acre
'30/1000 sq, ft., 150 /acre
60/1000 sq, ft., 600 /acre
90/1000 sq. ft.
40/1000 sq, ft., 90 /acre
1511000 sq. ft., 60 1acre
12/1000 sq. ft., 50 /acre
14/1000 sq. ft., 90 /acre
80/1000 so. ft.
15011000 sq. ft., 1000 /acre
200/1000 sq. ft., 1500 /acre
250 (125 one -wav) /lane
6011000 sq. ft., 600 /acre
100 (50 one -wav) /lane
27
CITY OF REXBURG HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM .TUNE 2006
26
35X
1
c�D
� 1
N
co �
N
N
O
O
z .I�
x
x
6
GQ
34 35
2650.59'
50HEMATIG, REPRE5ENTING
A PPROXIMATE BU I LD I NG
d I� 51ZE
I
N
N - f)
co CO
OI N
I I
t
-q- cn
N
4
I I
o Q
I I
26
35X
1
c�D
� 1
N
co �
N
N
O
O
z .I�
x
x
6
GQ
34 35
2650.59'
50HEMATIG, REPRE5ENTING
A PPROXIMATE BU I LD I NG
d I� 51ZE
I
N
N - f)
co CO
OI N
I I
-q- cn
N
4
I I
o Q
I I
m
I H
HOUSE PROP._
( o
'I CONSULTANTS:
DRAWN BY: JOB NO:
BAM 5
CHECKED BY: DATE:
BAM 5/21/0'7
PLOT DATE: 7 -10 -07
DRAWING NO.
FILE: SCHEMAmSIlEPLM (2) = SD -1
5=� - I
OF
N89 ( 55'44 "E
:• 4: • 111 SO
I
I
I
I
I
-- -- -- -- �A --
I
x
I
I
I
351
25 2�
4 �
F?ECEI VEC
JUL 1 0 2001
C 1 7 - Y O F REX13URG
5 f � y
4
�4�
Vd��l
uri,
6 �a
I H
HOUSE PROP._
k
M
I I
I
f,
f�
1.07 AC.
Y
PROPOSED I
PROPOSl:7v
I
N89'50'23 " c
c�
TANK I
1
I �
1 � '
a[ •
vi z
u � �
IRRI6. DITGH P
DRAWN BY: JOB NO:
BAM 5
CHECKED BY: DATE:
BAM 5/21/0'7
PLOT DATE: 7 -10 -07
DRAWING NO.
FILE: SCHEMAmSIlEPLM (2) = SD -1
5=� - I
OF
N89 ( 55'44 "E
:• 4: • 111 SO
I
I
I
I
I
-- -- -- -- �A --
I
x
I
I
I
351
25 2�
4 �
F?ECEI VEC
JUL 1 0 2001
C 1 7 - Y O F REX13URG
I
I
I
NOTE:
I BU I LD I NG FOOTPR I NT5 ARE
I H
HOUSE PROP._
I I
I
I 1
1.07 AC.
PROPOSED I
PROPOSl:7v
I
N89'50'23 " c
c�
TANK I
POTS I
I �
- -
vi z
z
IRRI6. DITGH P
- - -
- -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - N
N W
W
m
-- -- i
i I
I -
-- OAD-- -- w
w m
I
O
NOTE:
I BU I LD I NG FOOTPR I NT5 ARE
ASS IATES
1152 BOND AYBNU6 - Suite A
(208) 359 -2]09 FU (208) 359 -2271
RE)MM ID
FANNING'NHOWEY
28001 Cabot Ddw, Suite 110
NaO. Michigan 48377
(419) 586 -2292
313 D Street, Suite 200
Lewiston, Idaho 83501
(208) 746 -2661
CONSULTANTS
LANDSCAPE ARCHIIECT
CAR
IFJ A—
Suite 105, P.O. - 22943
EMMA NT 59104
(406) 252 -5515
Faz (406) 24}9855
CIVIL ENCINEMING
THE DYER MQUP 11C
310 N. 2nd E. Ste 153
R.bu Idaho 8
(208) 656 -8800
FA% (208) 658 -IMI
STRUCTURAL ENC4NElItlNG
ES2 Structural E'n91 e-
4943 Nort 26th Eav S1E A
Idaho Fdl% Idaho 83401
(208) 522 ]356
Fa (208) 552 -9302
MECHANICAL ENCINED"
ENCIN— SYSTEMS ASSOC.
315 wt Cent.
Pv 41. Idaho 83204
(208) 233 -0501
fax (801) 233 -0529
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
PAYNE ENIANEERINC NC.
1823 E C.t. S!
Pvc d, Idaho 83201
(208) 232 -4439
Fax (208) 232 -1435
it
v
a
a
F
RENSION:
MAN BY:
JOB NR
R.Sm
99q
CHECKED BY:
DATE
BAM
Jyfe '07
PLOT DATE: 7 -31 -07
DRAWING NO.
AE H8.3d.f -�0 • 501.1
SIP I.I
6
OF