Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPPLICATION - 06-00326 - Henderson Addition, Division 3 - Final Plat~~~~~ a CITY QF REXBL,~ R~ AMERIGA'~ FAMILY C~MMUNI'CY 4""< F~I1a\ ~~~1~ Plat Application for Approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plat The attached Subdivision plan has been prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Rexburg, and the following items are shown on the plan or plans, or explanations given with respect thereto. ~C~~ ~~ Requirements for Preliminary Plats ~U~ , ~ ?D All Preliminary Plats shall be 24' x 36' foldable, drawn to scale, North point, dated. C~Ty~F 40 ~~XeUR~ The following shall be shown on the Preliminary Plat or shall be submitted separately: 1. The name of the proposed subdivision: ~~P~/ ~S~r~ ~i y ~ 3 2. The location 5~ ~ S, Tbnl, ~ 39 ~ Acreage /q• ~g Number of Lots S3 3. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the subdivider or subdividers and the engineer or surveyor who prepared the plat: Subdivider / Name: ~,~/~ f-~2~/d~So-~ Address: ~~~~r9~ ~~ 8~¢'~ Phone Number: Cell Number: 3Sl - ~¢`a-7 Engineer Name: Sc. ~ ~e SS' 4~SSo~~ a~-s Address: ,~ to r.~ 2'=~ ~ ~u; ~ /a S Phone Number: 35~ - ~o~r a- Cell Number: ~9- ~87a- Surveyor Name: ~ ~ ~ ~ Address: Phone Number: Cell Number: 4. The name and address of all property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subdivision whether or not bisected by a public right-of--way as shown on record in the County Assessor's office. 5. The legal description of the subdivision. 1 6. A statement of the intended use of the proposed subdivision, siTch as: Residential - (single family, two-family and multiple housing); Commercial, Industrial, Recreational or Agricultural. Show sites proposed for parks, playgrounds, schools, churches or other public areas. 7. A map of the entire area scheduled for development if the proposed subdivision is a portion of a larger holding intended for sullsequent development. 8. A vicinity map showing the relationship of the proposed plat to the surrounding area (1/2 mile of minimum radius, scale optional). 9. Streets, street names, rights-of--way, and roadway widths, including adjoining streets or roadways, curbs and sidewalks. 10. Lot lines and blocks showing the dimensions and numbers of each. 11. Contour lines, shown at five (5) feet intervals where land slope is greater than ten percent (10%) and at two (2) feet intervals where land slope is ten percent (10%) or less, referenced to an established bench mark, including location and elevation. 12. Andproposed or existing utilities, including, but not limited to, storm and sanitary sewers, irrigation laterals, ditches, drains, bridges, culverts, water mains, fire hydrants, power, gas, street lights and their respective profiles and easements. 13. A copy of any proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions. (To be attached or submitted with final plat). 14. Any dedications to the public and/or easements, together with a statement of location, dimensions, and purpose of such. Please complete the following: (If not applicable, please fill in with N/A) 1. What is the land use and existing zoning of the proposed subdivision and the adjacent land? 2. Does subdivision conform to present zoning? y,eS 3. Requested zoning: ~ ~u~ 4. Variance Requested: Yes No ~ (If yes, attach written request) ~~(;E,VED 5. Requesting annexation to City? ~ ,JUG _ 6 z~~6 ~,dTy ~F REXBURG 2 ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Probably impact of the proposed project on the environment effect on: a. Public safety and convenience b. Fire, police, and ambulance services c. Recreation d. Schools e. Displacement or relocation of people f. Land values g. Local and long-distance travel, i.e., highway and local road impact h. Behavior of wildlife species i. Wager quality and effect on underground water supply j. Noise pollution k. Air pollution 1. Method proposed to dispose of storm drainage waters m. Extent of increased city road maintenance, including snow removal n. Flood plain -methods proposed to alleviate effect of 100-year flood; effect on adjacent properties. o. provisions for housing for persons of low and moderate income p. Harmony with the character of surrounding developments 2. Probably adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided a. Traffic Use b. Rights-of--way required c. Pollution effect on existing environment 3. Relationship between local short-term uses of man's economic environment and the long-term productivity. a. Existing vs. proposed tax base b. Costs to City if proposal approved (annual) 4. Measures taken to minimize harmful effects on environment a. Effects of construction activities b. Erosion control c. Stream pollution prevention d. Borrow-pit rehabilitation e. Fencing f. Buffer zones g. replacement of parklands or farmlands ~~~~~~F ~Ul ~ 6 D 2006 ~R~ 5. Is this plat plan harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the City's Comprehensive Plan? IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE REXBURG PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 3 • Findings of Fact City of Rexburg 12 North Center Phone: 208.359.3020 Rexburg, ID 83440 www.rexburg.org Fax: 208.359.3022 04 ~EXB URC .~'ti fa v` o :'I ''S CITY O F REXBURG America's Family Community Henderson Addition, Division 3 Final Plat 1. On July 6, 2006, Schiess & Associates presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Secretary a Request and Application for a Final Plat for Henderson Addition, Division 3. 2. On July 20, 2006, Kurt Rolland presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Commission the Request for approval of the Final Plat for Henderson Addition, Division 3. Mary Haley motioned to recommend to approve the final plat of Henderson Addition, Division 3. Mike Ricks seconded the motion. None opposed. Motion carried. 3. On August 02, 2006, Council Member Young moved to approve the Final Plat for Henderson Addition Division 3 with conditions: 1) The CCR's will require a uniform fence on Pioneer Road. 2) The development will meet road policy. Council Member Benfield seconded the motion. Discussion: Council Member Stevens asked to change wording to say "participate in curb and gutter." Public Works Director Millar recommended changing the wording to say "the development must be consistent with the typically approved city's cross road sections at a minimum and include a bike path as an integral part of the development. City Attorney Zollinger explained the city does have a street cross section including a bike path. The street width may not be the same in this case. The motion could state to "build their road with a typical city road cross section as modified and approved by the City Engineer." Council Member Young amended his motion to say "to approve the final plat for Henderson Addition Division 3 with the conditions: 1) The CCR's will require a uniform fence on Pioneer Road. 2) The development will meet road policy and "build their road with a typical city road cross section as modified and approved by the City Engineer." Council Member Benfield seconded the amended motion; Mayor Larsen said a change or modification in the road cross section needs City Council approval. All voted aye, none opposed. The motion carried.