HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPPLICATIONS & DOCS - 05-00163 - 2005 Comp Plan Map Amend - 4 AreasP.O. Box 280
Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~0 12 North Center Street
Rexburg,ldaho 83440
PHONE (208) 359-3020
STATE OF IDAHO Fnx (208) 359022
E-MAiI cityhall@ci.rexburg.id.us
AnnexatiorilRezone Application
Note: Apre-application conference with staffand apre-application neighborhood meeting are
required prior to the submittal of this application. Contact City Hall at 359-3020 for details.
File Number:
Fee:
Annexation: $500.00
Rezone: $
Current Zone: ~ Cross Reference File:
Requested Zone• ~ ` (! ,
Applicant Information
Applicant: ~ f~~~.(-Z(J F~ ~~~,~,. Phone:
^ Owner Purchaser ^ Lessee ~~,p„~~,s
Applicant's Address: C~9'~ ~ 1 ~, ~ (~,.} Zip:
Recorded Owner: (~;J~u, ; ~~R ~S, m}-rt Getra~:~N ~. Phone:
Recorded Owner Address: FAX:
,Contact Person (If different from above):
Address of Subject Property:
Property Description (You must attach the Lot, Block & Subdivision name or recorded deed with
a metes and bounds description):
Parcel Number:
Quarter: Section: ~_ Township: ~ Range: ~ D ~
Mapping Department must initial here to signify parcel verification:
Last Modified: 1/2312004 4:20 PM
Internal Office Routing
Planning and Zoning Coordinator Review
Public Works Department
Legal Services Office (Category A, B, or C)
Mayor
~~ ~3~9
.24(1 Z-
Phone:
Reviewed
(Annexation Plan)
(Can services be provided)
(Comprehensive Pian Compliant]
(Approval to proceed)
Administrative Review (Appropriate Fees Paid)
Annexation Fee: $250.00 Publication Fee: $250.00 Total Fees Dae $
Rezone Fees: (less than 1 acre) $500; (more than 1 acre, less than 5) $850; (5 to 10 acres} $900;
(over 10 acres but less than ZO acres) $1,500; (20 acres and over) $2,500;
Zoning Verification Letter (Financial Institutions) $25;
Date of Notice: Date of Public Hearing:
Development Information
1. Size of Property Square Feet. (Or) Acres;
2. How is the property now used? .~~--2.~ f nr ~
3. How aze the adjoining properties used?
North: --~(~~~v~, L ~y ~
South: ~~
fast: <<
West: ~ f
~. Are there any existing land uses in the genera3. area similar to the proposed use? If yes,
what are they, and where are they located?
5. On what street(s) does the property have frontage? .~ N'~ ~ ~ ~1'1dQ ~ ~ ~ O
6. Why are you requesting annexation in to the City of Rexburg? C 1 ~ ~ ~, U ~ ~ S
7. What use, building or structure is intended for the property? ~ ~ , awe ~ ~~-
i l,- . ~ (ra C~1 G~ ~ rn ~-~ a Cam- ! ~-~o~~ ~R u S P,~~2. bZ
8. What changes have occurred in the area that justifies the requested rezone?
~~x~~r2.G `~ ~~.c~mc~~ mo~.~ a~ ~ ~f,~c~+vgL C~~~~
9. Will this zone change have an impact on the schools? ~ E ~
10. Are water and sewer facilities, streets, fire and police presently serving this area?
~d
11. Are City services adequate to serve any future development proposed?
12. Will measures be proposed to assure that public facilities and services will be added?
~~" ~ 5
13. Is the site large enough to accommodate the proposed uses, parking, and buffering
required, according to zoningOrdinance #72~`~ ~ ~ ~
-14. _Is the. area currently sub-divided or going to be sub-divided? -
~ ~~
15. Any additional comments?
Note: When an application has been submitted, it will be reviewed in order to determine
compliance with application requirements. It will not be processed if it is not complete.
A hearing date will be scheduled only after an application has been accepted as complete.
1. A formal traffic study will be required for a retail sales area more than 75,000 feet;
Schools for more than 100 students; Apartment complex with ~0 apartments or more.
2. Before annexation, the person or firm applying for annexation will agree to certain
things: Curb and gutter, streets, signaling, water and sewer, property sizing and location.
Signature of Applicant: ~~%te: _ ~.3 ~ Q~.~
Additional Submittal Requirements:
The City of Rexburg requires the following information to be submitted to the City Clerk for
every application for annexation:
1. ~ Current Vicinity Map. (8 '/z x 11 ") at 1 " = 300' scale, showing location and current
zoning of the property. Map is available from the City Planning and Zoning Office.
Please indicate the location of your property on the map.
2. Land Description. Attach a description of the actual property which you wish to have
rezoned or annexed on a separate page. All land descriptions must be certified by a land
surveyor registered in the State of Idaho.
A. Description shall mathematically close.
B. Descriptions shall be provided for the perimeter of the total azea for which
~rriexat-ion is hetng requested;-and f-or -each ~c-me {sepa-rite zoa~g Llassi~Cationj
within said request. All zone descriptions shall correspond to the perimeter
description. Descriptions shall identify a basis of bearing based upon two {~)
known points from which the descriptions aze based
C. Descriptions provided may be required to be modified by the applicant to include
adjacent.roads, canals, ditches, xivers, creeks, etc. as may be identified by the
Public Works Department.
3. Photographs. Photos of existing site conditions.
4. Affidavit of Legal Interest. NOTE: No application will be accepted or processed
without this form.
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST
State of Idaho, County of Madison, City of Rexburg:
I,
(Name)
(Address)
{City) {State)
Being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and say:
1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my
permission to _ ,
(Name) (Address)
to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property.
2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold'the City of Rexburg and its employees harmless from
any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the
ownership of the property which is the subject of the .application.
Dated this day of , 20
(Signature)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day and the year first above written.
Notary Public-for-Idaho _ -_ _ ___ _ _ _
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
(Seal)
r.
t
PROCESS OF ANNEXATION
Properties subject to annexation must be contiguous or adjacent to City limits, with the exception
of an airport. 'The process of an annexation application is as follows:
A pre-annexation hearing before the City Council:
A. Owner should submit a letter requesting apre-annexation hearing before the City
Council. The letter must state the property owners name and address, request for
annexation and land use intent, and proposed zoning;
B. The property owner or representative must attend the Council meeting.
2. Application must include:
A. A legal description of the property which plainly and clearly defines the boundary
-of ~ new -district -or ~nnunicipaiity -describes, by meters end bounds, -a-def~t~
boundary of an area of land that can be mapped on a tax code area map. T'he legal
~descriptivn shall include:
1. Section, Township, Range and Meridian
2. An initial point, being a government surveyed comer, such as a section
corner, quarter corner, meander corner, or mineral survey comer;
3. A true point of beginning defined by bearings and distances from the
initial point, that begins the new or altered district or municipal boundary;
~. Bearings and distances that continuously define an area boundary with a
closure accuracy of at least 1 part in 5,000. Variations from closure
requirements of this subsection maybe approved when boundaries follow
mountain ranges, rivers, lakes, canals, etc.
5. The iegai xlescriptian -shall ~ciu~de uii gorti~ans of lrighways lying wholly
or partially within the annexed area.
B. Proof of ownership of land
C. A draft-like drawing of the layout of property, or a record of survey; as defined by
lC, Title 5~, Chapter 1 ~, which rnatches the legal desc~pt~~n.
D. All property owners' names and addresses within a radius of 300 ft. of the
property.
E. Fees must accompany application.
NOTE: Upon acceptance of the application, the developer/owner shall .post the property
described in the application no later than one week prior to all public hearings before
Planning and Zoning and City Council.
t°.
T
I ~
PREPARATION OF ANNEXATION
1. All required information is received and accepted by the City Clerk or appropriate staff.
2. After pre-annexation hearing a public hearing is set before the Planning and Zoning
Commission as provided for in IC 67-6509;
3. Transmittals sent to proper entities (power, water, sewer, highway districts, etc.)
4. Property owners within a radius of 300 ft. of the boundaries of the proposed annexable
property noticed. If there are 200 or more property owners alternate forms of procedures
will provide adequate notice and maybe used in lieu of mailed notice. (IC 67-6512);
5. Letter is sent to applicant advising them of the time and date of the hearing;
6. Planning and Zoning public hearing takes place and findings of the hearing are prepared;
7. After the acceptance of the findings by Planning and Zoning, Council public hearing date
iS Set acid published;
8. Following the Council hearing, the Council shall concurrently or immediately amend the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance (IC 67-2525);
9. UPON PASSAGE OF ANNE~~ATION AND ZONING BIT COUNCIL:
A. Certified copies of the ordinance shall be filed with the County Assessor, County
Treasurer, and State Tax Commission. The County Recorder must receive the
original (certified) for recording no later than 10 days following the effective date
of annexation (30-223)
B. Certified copies must include the executed ordinance, a Legal description, and a
map.
C. A summary of the annexation and zoning ordinance is published in the official
_ _ . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ newspaper of the city;
D. Three copies of the ordinance retained on file in City Hall.
10. The City boundary map is changed to reflect the annexation and zoning.
11. A formal Annexation Agreement will be developed between the City of Rexburg and the
Developer prior to Annexation.
~~~o
. ~.
-~
qa_ ~A
crnr of
RExBUR~
AMERICA'S FAMILY COMMUNITY
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
Submittal Requirements
Complete this application, provide all supporting documents, and submit to the Community Development
Department. MAP CHANGE REQUESTS WILL BE PROCESSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER REQUESTS AT
THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY FOLLOWING THIS SUBMITTAL. THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE ACTION BEFORE
THIS TIME IN THE EVENT THE CHANGE IS TIME SENSITIVE OR IT HAS BEEN AT LEAST 6 MONTHS SINCE THE
LAST AMMENDMENT DATE. TEXT AMMENDMENTS MAY BE PROCESSED ON AN ONGOING BASIS AND DO NOT
NEED TO (WAIT SIX MONTHS BETWEEnN REVISIONS. q
Name• ,r~,/ jliG~~~ ~ 1 `~C./~G~ Phone• ~~ - 6 3 7 /
Address: ~ G ~ ~ /~~~~ " " ~`~~f~l~~ ~~U Z--
1. Does the amendment request(s) concern a specific property? YES NO
2. Is this amendment request for a change in land use designation? YES, NO
3. Are you the owner or authorized agent of the property? YES~_ NO
4. Provide a description or a map of the area that this application affects.
5. Provide a reference to the section(s) of the Comprehensive Plan that you propose to amend,
including th page-If p licable (i ,Comp Pla Page xx, Line xx).
6. Provide proposed amendatory language. Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary.
7. Explain the reason(s) for this amendment proposal.
Application Year Application Number Fee Required: Y_ N_
Amount: $
Madison County /City of Rexburg GIS
n
m
0
a
c
ti
w
0
w
a
m
w
m
w
v
lR
.o
3
w
Page 1 of 1
http://gis/intranet/arcims/printable.aspx?MapURL=http://agentsmith/output/arcIMSAGE... 4/ 12/2005
;; rt -; ..,~„F.u~;.;••,..c., ,r<. ~.r,::t,. ~ „i> .w.I.~n~._.w:~a.~+~..~w.,s-:'~:w:.w,r.~~ec,.,.
1 a 5~G~7 i
G
QUITCLAIM DEED
~ i ~,
} THIS INDENTURE, Made thb 1st day of JULY ~ 4
in the year o1 our Lord one thousand nine hundred and 91 betweet
1
s! WANDA M. HARRIS
x ^,.- i
i
3
of IDAHO FALLS County of HONNEVILLE
State of IDAHO ,the pert of tha first pert, and
THE HARRIS FAMILY TRUST -yr ~ww• /9P.?
of IDAHO FALLS County of BONNEVILLE
State of I OAHO .the part of the eeeoad part.
WTfNE&4ET8, That the said part ~ the first part, for and fa coiuideration of the sum o!
TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS,
lawful money of the Uaited Staten of America, to in hand paid by the said part of
the second paSA the receipt whereof is hereby aelmowledQed, do by these pres nlz romiee, rolease
sad forever QUITCLAIM, unto the said pert as the second part, and to heirs and
alai ~°1tEXBUR6 ~a bt piece or parcel of laud, situate, ),yinp and being in
Cc:uaty of MADISON ,State of Idaho, bounded and particularly
deseribad as follows, to-wit:
The North } of the Southwest }. Section 8. Township 6 Norte, Range 40 E.B.M.
LESS: Commencing at a po'.nt which is N 0 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds W 1346.11
ft. along section 11ne end N R9 degrees 45 minutes 50 seconds E 45.0 ft from
the Southwest corner of Section 8. Township 6 North. Range 40 E.B.M.. Madison
County. Idaho. said point being on the East R/W line of the county road. and
running tMnee N 0 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds M 208.71 ft. along said R/W
line and parallel with acid se:tion line: thence N 89 degrees 45 minutes 50
seconds E 208.71 ft.: thence S 0 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds E 208.71 ft.:
thence 589 degrees 45 minutes 50 seconds N 208.71 ft. to the point of beginning.
Contains 1.0 acres.
Ftrsr Amen m ~ ~ ~9
can Tirle Company
WARRANTY DEED
For Value Received FRANK H. JACOBS and GERALDINE M. JACOBS, husband and wife
Hereinafter called the Grantor, hereby grants, bazgains, sel]s & conveys to
MOUNTAIN GOLD, INC.
whose address is: 155 North 1st West, Rexburg, ID 83440
Hereinafter called the Grantee, the following described premises siruated in Madison County, Idaho, to-wit:
TRACT 1:
Nl/2SI/2SW1/4 of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise, Meridian, Madison County, Idaho.
LESS COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: Beginning at a point 656.21 feet North of the Southwest comer
of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and running
thence North 639.21 feet;thence East 2432.65 feet; thence South 639.21 feet;thence West 2432.65 feet to the
point of beginning.
LESS COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
TRACT 5:
Commencing at a point where the Westerly boundary line of the Union Pacific Railroad night-of--way
intersects the West line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise
Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, which point is 59.1 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Southeast
Quarter and running thence North 146.46 feet; thence West 200 feet; thence South 205.56 feet; thence East
165.3 feet, thence Northeasterly along said railroad right-of--way to the point of beginning.
LESS COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
RESERVING asixty-foot wide easement across the entire Southeast corner thereof, parallel and contiguous
to the Union Pacific Railroad right-of--way.
SUBJECT TO all easements, right of ways, covenants, restrictions, reservations, applicable building and zoning ordinances and use
regulations and restrictions of record, and payment of accruing present yeaz taxes and assessments as agreed to by parties above.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee and to the Grantee's heirs
and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that the Grantor is the owner in fee
simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and
except U. S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and easements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor will
warrant and defend the same from all claims whatsoever.
Dated: APRIL ~, 2000
,r;
.- ~. ~
RANK . Jf1COBS GERALDINE M. JACOBS
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF MADISON
ss
On This ~ day of APRIL, in the year 2000, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared FRANK H. COBS AND GERALDn1E M. 7ACOBS, known or identified to me to be the persons whose names aze
ibed to the wi in •Instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same.
_ ~,~ 28 3.423
LORNA-LEIGH M~cr^=;T v^
Notary Public o£ Idaho ~R d ~ ~~'.^~
STATE OF IDAHO ~- Day A<.
Residing2~ ~~. ,Idaho NOTARY-~'~-PUBLIC ~'„RILY'~ R R?S~sU.cctr~
Commission Expires ~^r C.~ MADISON C~UtJIY RcCORCrR
Fee S ~ ~~- C
Ra:;croe~ ,4t ^^-ca~~yy=ys? o'
First '° 1~ue l~Y
American Title Cam PAY / r ( o~ ~ c(Q `~
WARRANTY DEED
For Va[ue Received FUGAL LAND PARTNERSHIP, a ConnccHcut Partnership
Hereinafter called the Grantor, hereby grants, bargains, sells & conveys to
MOUNTAIN GOLD, INC.
whose address is: 155 North ist West, Rexburg, ID 83440
Hereinafter called the Grantee, the following described premises situated [n IYladison County, Idaho, ro-wit:
TRACT 4:
Commencing at a point 1295.56 feet North of the southeast comer of the Southwest Quartet of Section 8,
Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and running thence West 200
feet; thence South 1093.35 feet; thence East 200 feet; thence North 1093.35 feet to the point of beginning.
SUBJECT TO all easements, right of ways, covenants, restrictions, reservations, applicable building and zoning ordinances and use
regulations and restrictions of record, and payment of accraing present year taxes and assessments a9 agreed to by patties above.
TO >:IAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenaneas unto the said Grantee and to the Grantee's heirs
and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to end with the said Grantee, that the Grantor is the owner in fee
simple of said premises; that said premises ere free froth all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and
except U. S. patent reservations, restriaivns, easements of record, and easements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor will
warrant end defend the same from all claims whatsoever.
Dated:~~ .2000
OLIVE II. FUGAL, GENERAL PARTNER
ICRISTINA G. SANCHER, GENERAL PARTNER
JAN P. GAL, G RAL PARTNER
ARA C. NEWELL, GENERAL PARTNER
Micro'ilm Nc 2~~3~!Z:i
MADISDti CDUN'"Y RECORDER>
STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) . .
as Fee S DepLty
COUNTY OF ) ryr Re~Oro~~ At rieq~; pc
On This day of _, in the year 2000, before me, a Notary Pu r n aoi7aT's~d-9tate~ --
personally appeared OLIVE H. FUGAL, JAN P. FUGAL AND KRISTINA G. SANCHER, ]mown or identiSed to me to be one
of the partners in the partnership of FUGAL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and the partner or one of the partners who
subscribed said partrtership name to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in said
partnership name.
Notary public of CONNECTICUT
Residing at , CT
Commission Expires:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1
COUNTY OF Go^~~ CoS~°l 1 ~
On This ~t~ day of r ~ ~ io the year 2000, before me, a Notary public in and for said State,
personally appeared SARA C. NEWELL, Jwown or identified to me to be one of the partners in the partnership of FUGUAL
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and the partner or one of the partners who subscribed said partnership name to the
foregoing instrument, and eeknowiedged to me that ha executed the same in said partnership name.
~nrurruunurrcrrrruuerrgrnrnr.
MARINA VAZQUQ
COMM. tt1220043
Motniivt+UBt1C•PJY.IPAnNIA ~ Notary public of CALIF RNI~41
~ M~yy ~~' C Residing att.~l, fi4rck CA
~rsAlA~l l~~iiNiiiriiiiiir~ir~irrr CornmisslOn Expires; ~' 1 ~- ~Gb
r ~cricaa lide CQmp~y
WARRANTY DEED
For Value Received FUGAL LAND PARTNERSffiP, a Connecticut Partnership 1/2 INTEREST; FRANK
H. JACOBS and GERALDINE M. JACOBS, husband and wife, 1/2 INTEREST
Hereinafter called the Grantor, hereby grants, bargains, sells & conveys to
MOUNTAIN GOLD, INC. {
whose address is: 155 North 1st West, Rexburg, ID $3440 1
Hereinafter called the Grantee, the following described premises situated in Madison County, Idaho, to-wit:
TRACT 2:
Beginning at a point 656.21 feet North of the Southwest corner of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian,
Madison County, Idaho, and running thence North 639.21 feet;thence East 2432.65 feet; thence South 639.21 feet;thence West
2432.65 feet to the point of beginning. LESS COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
TRACT 3:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and
running thence North 656.21 feet; thence East 2432.65 feet; thence South 65621 feet; thence West 2432.65 feet to the point of
beginning.
LESS COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
TRACT 6:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise, Meridian,
Madison County, Idaho, and running thence South 514 feet; thence East ] 190 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Union
PaciEc Railroad right-of--way,; thence North 30°20' East along said
right-of--way a distance of 605 feet, more or less, to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 8, Township and
Range aforesaid; and running thence West 1,506.26 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning.
LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: Commencing at a point 100 feet South of the Northwest corner of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 8, Township 6 Nortlt, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and running thence South 414
feet; thence East 200 feet; thence North 414 feet, thence West 200 feet to the point of beginning.
TOGETHER WITH a peryetual easement to use a 60-foot wide right-of--way over and across the North 60 feet and the West 60
feet of the
above lessed out property.
TOGETHER WITH the right and option to extend railroad spur as disclosed in Warranty Deed recorded March 30, 1982,
Instrument No. 193147.
TOGETHER WITH A 90 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT running Northeasterly parallel with and adjacent to the Westerly boundary
of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of--way from an existing railroad and ditch crossing which is over and across the following
described property: Commencing at a point 5l4 feet South of the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 8,
Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and running thence South 755.29 feet; thence East 43
rods, more or less, to the West line of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of--way; thence Northeasterly along said railroad right-of-
way to a point 514 feet South of the North line of the southeast Quarter of said Section 8; thence West 1190 feet, more or less, to
the point of beginning.
TOGETHER WITH THE JOINT USE OF A 25 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS from the public road
described as follows:
Beginning at a point where the Westerly boundary of line of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of--way intersects the West line of
the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise, Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, which is 3 rods,
more or less, (59.1 feet), North of the Southwest corner of said southeast Quarter, Section, Township and Range aforesaid, and
running thence North 2035.43 feet; thence East 25 feet; thence South to the Westerly boundary of said Union Pacific Railroad
right-of--way, and thence in a Sout~twesterly direction following said Westerly following said Westerly boundary of said Union
Pacific Railroad right-of--way to the point of beginning.
TOGETHER WiTI-I A' SIX FOOT WIDE EASEMENT for a irrigation ditch, the centerline of which commences at a point 514
feet South and 3 feet East of the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, ToHmship 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise
Meridian, Madison County, Idaho, and running thence South 755.29 feet, more or less, to a pump, motor and switch panel.
L 83422
n;t:;RILYt~ R. RAS',":`~SSEN
MAD{50N COUNTY R~C,^,RDER
' Deputy
Fee S ~
Rece-~a~ At R Guest cf
lid
~N i ~ I J. LVV:J O ~ VUHIYI
Stag ofTc~~lza, Coumy of;Madison,
City ot"12exbur •
Na, 05$6 P, 1
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .
Name) R ~ ~a
.~-- ~ ~~1, yG
~~ ~~ l ~ CIS (.~d'S~
~~ .~- .n r~ ~ ~
{~~
first duly sworn ,zpcn oath, depose aid say;
1. That I am tl1e record after of tho ro
Permission to ~ Y descn'bed on the ached, and T ,fit na,
~.~ ~~~ ~ ~, ~~ y
to submit the accom pp ~ t AJ `;~~ ~ ~
,P~3'~g a Iication pertstt~ng to that prop, (dress) ~? ~ y o z.
Z. I agree to iaad
yy defend and hold 'the City of Rexbur
any claim or viability resulting tram an g' ,axtd tts employ Mess from
ownership of the ro Y dispute as to the sta~tetnents captained herein ar es to the
~ y ~h1Ch I5 the subje~ of the .appli~o~.
Dated this / ==j clay of ~~+~ '
~~~~
~~T$SC~tI$Eb AND SW4Ri`T to before me this day and the yeax first above writt~,.
o+. ,~} , ~ ~ .... .. .
~`: '~ Camnziss%n Ewes:
~~ _ "7- ,t~,~
4
J ~t ~r
/`fir ,, Py~~ ~ if l~lt 1 ~a~~ ```W~~
AVZ'.~ ~3F I~EG~,.~~REST
~~}
* ~ n` i~ IJ. LVUJ O:VOHIYI Na, OJU~ P,
A.FF7Z1Ay~ Clh' Z~EGAY, ~~~T
State +~f rdaho, Gouaty afMad~ison, Ci
ty Q~~.e~rbur~:
Name) ~S > /I/~.L~y~ ~~y ,~~,r
{ )
~~, first duly s>~orrt {~)
upon ~~, depose aad s$y:
1• ;i~at I am t1~ee recor offer ofthe
l~~ission to ~. j~~ ~ descrt'bed on the atCac~etl, and I
~N'eme) ~ ~ o ~ D y ~s
to submit the aCCampaayi~g applicatiaa (Address) ` ~ `3 ~1 ° 2_
Fig to that l~'
~. I agree tQ ~q
day, defend and .hold 'the City of Rexbur$ aztd its em o
ashy Claim or iisbi7ity resulting from an. P? Yes Mess from
ownershi ofthe ro y ~spute as to the statements carrr~II,~d.jn or ~ to the
.P , .~ j3Crty ~l~iCl1 i5 the subject a~t1]C .~0~.
Dated this ~, o£ r .
~~
S~tTBSCR~I;D ~ SWQRN to t~fore me this day and tle y~ t above writt~.
./~~
J
Notate F`ublic for•I hcx ...... ........ _ ...
Resciin~ at: ..
+~,Illl~clli/!///~~ ~y Co~a~ssion E~ires: i
~ • •. .•
,~-. ~,o~rnr~r•..
J,'•~'UB1-tG ,~
Itt11111
~~~
Madison County /City of Rexburg GIS
z ~
~ f ~
~ '
~ .,~~, .. ~
:~
•~
+4a
,~
s ~, 'g . ~
:`
l
.
x
. ~`
Page 1 of 1
K {+
.. ~ {.
~yX~
,yam ' as ~* ~<
~~ m b
~ ~.
G
v
~~;.
S ~?
w~ ,~.
4
_°
http://gis/intranet/arcims/printable.aspx?MapURL=http://agentsmith/output/arcIMSDevelo... 5/ 18/2005
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E of Madison
County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025 feet to the North Rexburg interchange and
following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N 5-
31-29 E adistance of 609.6 feet, thence N 5-32-15 E a distance of 68 feet, thence N 66-54-26 E a
distance of 2,026.9 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 7000 feet and an
angle of 12-25-44 with an arc length of 1518.45, thence continuing S 27-58-16 E a distance of
1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S 30-8-11 W a distance of 3,038.57
feet, thence South 89-44-22 West a distance of 2,605.63 feet to the point of beginning.
2. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470 feet, and thence
East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
-A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1;726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet, thence South
656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
• Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
• Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
d~
a
CITY OF
REXBURG
AMERICAS FAMILY COMMUNITY
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
Submttta~ Requirements
Complete this application, provide all supporting documents, and submit to the Community Developmerrt
Departrnent. MAP CHANGE REQUESTS WILL BE PROCESSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER REQUESTS AT
THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY FOLLOWING THIS SUBMITTAL THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE ACTION. BEFORE
THIS TIME IN THE EVENT THE CHANGE IS TIME SENSTTNE OR R HAS BEEN AT LEAST 6 MONTHS SINCE THE
LASTAMMENDMENT DATE. TEXTAMMENDMENTS MAY BE PROCESSED ON AN ONGOING BASIS AND DO NOT
NEED TO WAIT SIX MONTHS BETWEEN REVISIONS.
Name:,,~~~ ~ w3 (~ f•~ u ~er2 Phone: ..~ S~ " ~ ~' ~
Address: 33 ~ ~ ~~~' !~
1. Does the amendment request(s) ooncem a spedflc property? YES ~ 0
2. Is this amendment request for a change In land use designation? YES ~ NO
3. Are you the owner or authorized agent of the property? YES / NO
4. Provide a description or a map of the area that this application affects.
5. Provide a reference to the section(s) of the Comprehensive Plan that you propose to amend,
Including the page-If applicable (i.e.. Comp Plan, Page roc, Line roc).
6. Provide proposed amendatory language. Attach separate sheet(s) If necessary.
7. Explain the reason(s) for this amendment proposal.
Application Year Application Number Fee Required: Y N_
Amount: $
8. Please describe how your proposed amendment meets the following selection criteria. Use a
separate sheet(s) If necessary:
a. Was this proposed amendment dented during a previous Comprehensive Plan review
cycle:
Yes_.,~,.No _. if Yes, briefly explain why (if known):
b. Explain how the amendment advancers the goals and policies of the Comprehensive
o~~...
a What are the cumulative effects of this proposed amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan: _
Property Owners Authorized Agent: If you are the property owner's agent, you are required to
provide a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing submittal of this application.
I hereby certify that 1 have read and examined this application and know the same to be a true
under penalty of perJury by the Laws of the State of Idaho and am authorized to make this
application as the agent of the property owner.
Agent's Signature: Date
Print NameL _ Phone:
Application Year Application Number Fee Required: Y N_
Amount: S
Madison County /City of Rexburg GIS
Page 1 of 1
http://gis/intranet/arcims/printable.aspx?MapURL=http://agentsmith/output/arcIMSDevelo... 5/ 18/2005
~~
o
~.
4e[fy~lE~+~
CITY OF
RExBUR~
AMERICA'S FAMILY COMMUNITY
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
Submittal Requirements
Complete this application, provide all supporting documents, and submit to the Community Development
Department. MAP CHANGE REQUESTS WILL BE PROCESSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER REQUESTS AT
THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY FOLLOWING THIS SUBMITTAL. THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE ACTION BEFORE
THIS TIME IN THE EVENT THE CHANGE IS TIME SENSITIVE OR R HAS BEEN AT LEAST 6 MONTHS SINCE THE
LAST AMMENDMENT DATE. TEXT AMMENDMENTS MAYBE PROCESSED ON AN ONGOING BASIS AND DO NOT
NEED TO WAIT SIX MONTHS BETWEEN REVISIONS.
Name• ~UC'~OV~ ~'ti' Phone• ~~ 0 - 4?~ -
Address:-. ~~ 50 M.,~r~vale eve. ~' l0~ 10< /'~a~la ~.~ 9®0~~
1. Does the amendment request(s) concern a specific property? YF.S~ NO
2. Is this amendment request for a change in land use designati n? YES~,_ NO
3. Are you the owner or authorized agent of the property? YES~C NO
4. Provide a description or a map of the area that this application affects.
~.(~ E. I s+ 5.
t~~l ~ R~~~o goo [ ~~~ n
5. Provide a reference to the section(s) of the Comprehensive Plan that you propose to amend,
including the page-if applicable (i.e., Comp Plan, Page xx, Line xx).
6. Provide proposed amendatory language. Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary.
7. Explain the reason(s) for this amendment proposal. ~ ~ ~ ~~
Application Year a.DO ~ Application Number Fee Required: Y N_
Amount: $
o P.O. Box 280
Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 12 North Center Street
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
PHONE (208) 359-3020
STATE OF IDAI10 PqX (208) 359-3022
EMAIL citYhall@ci.rexburg.id.us
Anne~ation/Rezone application
Note: Apre-application conference with staff and apre-application neighborhood meeting are
required prior to the submittal of this application. Contact City Hall at 359-3020. for details.
File Number:
Fee:
Annexation: $500.00
Rezone: $
Current Zone: ~~ ~,
Requested Zone: ,~
Cross Reference File:
Applicant Information
Applicant: C~~~oi~ j~a~-~- Phone: ~~~7-/~~? _41,7
Owner ^ Purchaser ^ Lessee
Applicant's Address: ~ ly(i,(y ~ « #lD / ~iC~-, Zip:
Recorded Owner: ~x,_,.,,~., ~.~ ~ ~~~,~ Phone:
Recorded Owner Address: FAX:
,Contact Person (If different from above):
Address of Subject Property: ~,~~; ~_ ~ s-~ <,'
ADO
Phone:
Property Description (You must attach the Lot, Block & Subdivision name or recorded deed with
a metes and bounds description):
Parcel Number: i~PR ~ R00~ ~7 2D
Q~rte2: Section: Township: Range:
Mapping Department must initial here to signify parcel verification:
Last Modified: 1/23/2004 4:20 PM
Internal Office Routing
Planning and Zoning Coordinator Review
Public Works Department
Legal Services Office (Category A, B, or C)
Mayor
Reviewed
(Annexation Plan)
(Can services be provided)
(Comprehensive Pian Compliant)
(Approval to proceed)
Administrative Review (Appropriate Fees Paid)
Annexation Fee: $250.00 Publication Fee: $250.00 Total Fees Due $
Rezone Fees: (less than 1 acre) $500; (more than 1 acre, less than 5) $850; (5 to 10 acres} $900;
(over 10 acres but less than 20 acres) $1,500; (20 acres and over).$2,500;
Zoning Verification Letter (Financial Institufions) $25;
Date of Notice: Date of Public Hearing:
Development Information
1. Size of Property Square Feet. (Or) Acres;
2. How is the property now used? L~j ~ - ~
3. How are the adjoining properties used?
North: ~~s•~ ~ ~a ~,~~/„
South:
fast: ,;.°,~~ ,'I~-
West:
4. Are there any Existing land uses in the general area similar to the proposed use? if yes,
what are they, and where are they located?
5. Qn what street(s) does the property have frontage? ~,;~,~( ~~;{- ~ ~+ ~k~.~
6. Why are you requesting annexation in to the City of Rexburg?
7. What use, building or structure is intended for the property?
8. What changes have occurred in the area that justifies the requested rezone? _~~, ~
9. Will this zone change h ve an impac on the schools? /~/~ fi~ :,~,'~ f~:cov+~.
10. Are water and sewer facilities, streets, fire and police presently serving this area?
~E:.
11. Are City services adequate to serve any future development proposed?
bra
12. Will measures be proposed to assure that public facilities and services will be added?
13. Is the site large enough to accommodate the proposed uses, parking, and buffering
required, according to zoning tjrdinance ~~2~~? Y~
14. _ _Is the. area currently sub-divided or going to be sub-divided?
~~~
15. Any additional comments?
Note: When an application has been submitted, it will be reviewed in order to determine
compliance with application requirements. It will not be processed if it is not complete.
A hearing date will be scheduled only after an application has been accepted as complete.
1. A formal traffic study will be required for a retail sales area more than 75,000 feet;
Schools for more than 100 students; Apartment complex with ~0 apartments or more.
2. Before annexation, the person or firm applying for annexation will agree to certain
things: Curb and gutter, streets, signaling, water and sewer, property sizing and location.
~~ '"'
/ ~-_
Signature of Applicant: ~~_,~"• °~`'~ ~ ,~-~ ~ Date: ~ 'Z,00
~ CtTY OF
RExBUR~
q~~s AMERICAS FAMILY COMMUNffY
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
Submittal Requirements
Complete this application, provide all supporting documents, and submit to the Community Development
Department. MAP CHANGE REQUESTS WILL BE PROCESSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER REQUESTS AT
THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY FOLLOWING THIS SUBMITTAL. THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE ACTION BEFORE
THIS TIME IN THE EVENT THE CHANGE IS TIME SENSITIVE OR IT HAS BEEN AT LEAST 6 MONTHS SINCE THE
LAST AMMENDMENT DATE. TEXT AMMENDMENTS MAYBE PROCESSED ON AN ONGOING BASIS AND DO NOT
NEED TO WAIT SIX MONTHS BETWEEN REVISIONS.
Name: ~Y ~-n~•~-~ 1~ ~ ~~~-~„~o.u- ~- ~~-'~~`b°JPhone: ~,h ~a -f~23~
Address:_ ~d ~s 'P Y c ~~ ss I o ~.a, ~ P l ~ °z-c~
1. Does the amendment request(s) concern a specific property? YES t~ NO,
2. Is this amendment request for a change in land use designation? YESJ/ NO (~ ~~~/
3. Are you the owner or authorized agent of the property? YES >~NO S~ ~~
4. Provide a description or a map of the area that this application affects.
~}~
5. Provide a reference to the section(s) of the Comprehensive Plan that you propose to amend,
including the page-if applicable (i.e., Comp Plan, Page xx, Line ux).
6. Provide proposed amendatory language. Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary.
7. Explain the reason(s) for this amendment proposal.
Application Year Application Number Fee Required: Y_ N_
Amount: $
WARRANTY DEED
Order No.:3040414555-T
FOR VALUE RECEIVED
Steven Bjornn and Marsha i3jornn, Husband and Wife
the grantor(s), doles} hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto
Gary L. Lovell and Carolee W. Lovell, Husband and Wife
whose current address is
473 Morgan Dr. Rexburg, ID 83440
~.~ a ~~~ ~
dead, Approved,
Amend Accepted
the grantee(s), the following described premises, in Madison County, Idaho, TO WIT:
Commencing at a point 56.25 feet West of the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Rigby
Addition to the City of Rexburg, as per the recorded plat thereof, and running thence West 42 feet;
thence South 165 feet; thence East 42 feet; thence North 165 feet to the paint of beginning.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said demises, with their appurtenances onto the said Grantee, heirs and assigns
forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Gratrtee(s), that (she islare the owner(s) in
fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all encumbrances Except: Conant Year Taxes, conditions,
covenants, restrictions, reservations, easeanents, rights and rights ofway, apparent or ofrecord.
And that (she will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever.
Da#ed: T1/11/2004
Steven Bjornn Marsha Bjomn
State of Idaho }
} ss.
County of Madison }
On this day of November,, in the year ?Alkt_ before n:ie, a Notary Public in and for said state, per~nally appeared
-Steven $jortm and Marsha Bjomn_ known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
instnunent and acknowledged to me that they- executed the same.
IN WIITJESS WI~REOF I have herelmto ~t my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fust above written.
Notary Publir• far the State sf Idaho
Residing at:
Commission Expires:
ALLL~NCE
TITL[ i [lCAOW COi-.
WARRANTY DEED
For Value Received
JOHN C. PORTER and ANNETTE PORTER, husband and wife
.the grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto
~ 2 ~ c ~-a ~ Wl.~;,,r'v,
TARGHEE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., an Idaho Limited Liability Company
whose current address is
36 Professional Plaza
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
the grantee(s), the following described premises, in MADISON County IDAHO, to wit:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 1 OF THE RIGBY ADDITION TO
THE CITY OF REXBURG, MADISON COUNTY, IDAHO, AS PER THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF,
AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 214.5 FEET; THENCE EAST 66.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH'214.5 FEET;
THENCE WEST 66.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee ,heirs
and assigns forever. And the said Grantor do hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), that (s)he is/are
the owner(s) in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all encumbrances Except: Subject to all
existing patent reservations, easements, right of way, protective covenants, zoning ordinances, and applicable
building codes, laws and regulations.
and that (s)he will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever.
Dated: AUGUST 3, 1999
JO OR ER
U, ~4~~~
~~ ANNETTE PORTER
STATE OF ID, COUNTY OF MADISON
On this 3RD day of AUGUST,1999
before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared
JOHN C. PORTER
ANNETTE PORTER ''
known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s)
subscribed to the within instruments and acknowledged~te-1
.~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, i "T `~ Y ~ , O e ~ ~ ~~..
`RX28342
WARRANTY DEED
For Value Received Clarene Brown, an unmarried woman
Hereinafter called the Grantor, hereby grants, bargains, sells and conveys unto
Fast American Title Company
~ 5 ~ d w ~ 2 ~~,~ `~
Gary L Lovell and Carolee W. Lovell, husband and wife, Robert C. Lofgren and Linda H.
Lofgren, husband and wife,
whose address is: 36 Professional Plaza, Rexburg, Idaho 83440
Hereinafter called the Grantee, the following described premises situated in Madison County, Idaho, to-wit:
Commencing at a point one rod North of the Southwest comer of Lot One in Block One of the
Rigby Addition to the City of Rexburg, as per the recorded plat then:of, and running thence
North Three rods; thence East Ten rods; thence South Three rods; thence West Ten rods to
the place of beginning.
SUBJECT TO all easemerrrs, right of ways, oovenar>ts, reshictions, reservations, applicable building and zoning
ordinances and use regulations and reshictions of record, and payment of aaxuing present year taxes and assessments
as agreed to by parties above.
- - - .. _`J ---~~ ,.~ ~~r ar~nurtenances unto the said Grantee and tD the
.. ,~ ~ _ _ u....~ +~,~
~. ....
~'
~`$ - .~
a
vim,.,, ,... , .~~~ , , ., ~ ,~....~
WARR~NT1r DEED
Order No.:30~0111~89-G
FUR VALIIE RECEIVED ~ ~ ~d d
~~ ~~~ Z
Hazel Willmore
the grantor(s). do(es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto
Douglas Smith
«hose current address is ~ ~+5 ~~ ~ G 6 ~ Q /Y fC a X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~I hlry ~ ~U
the grantee(s), the following described premises, in Madison County, Idaho, TO t~Vl'1':
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 8, Block 1, of the Rigby Addition to the City of
Rexburg, 14`ladison County, Idaho as per the recorded plat thereof, and running thence Sauth 7=1.25
feet; thence east 165 feet; thence North 90.75 feet; thence West 165 feet; thence South 16.5 feet to
the point. of beginning.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, heirs anti assigns
forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), that (s)he is/are the otj-ner(s) in
fee siinplc of said premises; that they are free from all encumbrances Except: Cisiieni Year Taxes, couditioas.
covenants, restrictions, resenjations, easements, rights artd rights of way, apparent or of record.
And that (s)he will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever.
Dated: 1/02/2002
't~-~~,c. `rJ~,ti.
Hazel VlTillmore
State of Idaho }
} ss.
County of Madison }
On this
appeared
Hazel Willmore
before me, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally
kno~vu or identified to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the lvithin instnunent; and acknowledged
to me that he/she/the}- executed the same.
IN WITNESS ~~1~HEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above
written.
Notary Public for the State of Idaho
Residing at:
Coimt~ission Expires:
~irs~:~~errcar l~IP9 ~;pmpany
WARR.Al'~TY I)~~b
For valve Tte~eeived Robert L, ~Vitgenstein Jr, and Stephanie A. Witgenstefn, husband and wife
1-Tere~~er called the Grantor, hereby grants, bargains, sells & ear~veys to
Douglas J. Smyth and G. Eartetee Smith, husband and wife
wholes address is: r!o `Sb Profeasional Plaxa, Rexburg, Y.D 83440
HereinaRer called the Grantees, the following described premises situated in Madison County, Idaho, to-wit:
.k,.,
2 I ~' £ ~s Sb
U
Gommenciag at a point 7 rods East of the Southwvest corner of Lot 8, flock I of the Rigby Addition
to the Gity of R:e~cburg, Madison Couuaty, Idaho, as pcr the recorded plat thereof, a~ad running thence
last 3 reds; thence North 10 rods, more ar less to tEze SoatL beak of the Rexburg City Ditch or
Canal; tbertce Westerly ataag the South Back of the saiitl canal a distance of 3 rods, more or Mesa;
thence South YO nods, more or less, to the point of beginning.
SUBJECT TQ all easements, right of ways, covenants, restrictions, reservations, applicable building and ~iag ordinances and use
regulations and restri~ions of record, and paymesrt of ~erlttttg present Year taxes and asse~esnAnrQ ~ ~ by ~ above.
TO T~IAVE AYdD 'Y'O flOt,,p the said premises, with their appurtenances unto said Grantee and to the Cxrantea's ;kirs
and assigns forever. And the said Grantor dyes hereby covenant to and with the said Crrantee:, that tht l3raator is the owner in fee
simple of said premises; that said premises are free &am a!l encumbrances
except U. S. Fattnt reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and e2~emen s vise bi@ uy~ ' levies, and assrssme~nts, and
warrant slid defend the same from all claims whatsoever. A~ the premises, and that Grantor will
Dated: Angttst 15, 1995
Ro art L. Witgens#ein Jr, Stephanie A. Witgeaste
`•5:,
STA'T'E OF IDAHO -' '1 i (rr~`''i,
F ;~
corrnr~ OF c~ a r~- ";.
s a- o ..
ap ` d Robett La , , ,t$ Jr. end
are s sctTbed :td - tip
1_ ~ .y
~ ,~ ;7 . _ ; ,f;-~ .
Ncitaty ~blic ref ~)
Ra¢irisno achl~j~'lj"`
C1~m+~n _ ~ --e_S !c ~ 3 ~ ~
ss
}
August, in the year 1995, before me, a Notary Public Tn ant! far said State, pexsona!!y
Stephanie A. 'GVitgenstein, known 4r identified to me to be the person{s} wheat naffs}
and admo~vledged to me that they execwted the same.
0$/15/95 08:36 TX/RX N0.0106 P.007
~~IARP~ANTY DEED
For Value Received
John M. Bats and LaFeP L. Bats, HUSBAND AND WLFE.
the grantor s, do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto
Plary L. Bu:,~s, A SIt7GLE WOMAN.
whose cur: en! address is
55 South Gnd Past, Rexburg, ID 83440
the grantee ,the follo~:7ng described premises, in.........._.~d}~,n....Conntp Idaho, to wit:
Commencing at a point four and one-half {4~) rods South of the Northwest
corner of Lot Eight (8), Block One {1) of the Rigby Addition to the City
of P.exburg, as per the recorded plat thererof, in Madison County, State
of Idaho, and running thence Past 112 feet' thence South fiva and one-half
{S~) cods, more or less, to the Eourh +:ank of the Rexburg, City Canal;
thence Westerly along the South bank of said canal a distance of 112 feet,
more or less, to the West line of said Lot Eight (8); thence North five
,,/~ and one-half (5~{) rods, wore or less, to the place of beginning. Excepting
therefrom an easement for ingress and egress over and across the Soutt:erly
9 feet of the above described property.
~~~ .I
t
-.,i
'2~`.`.
,s•
~~~.
~' •'
.~,` ,
:~• .
.%: ...
'-.
',
N..
~.y.
.1
~:
,yk
~5=
~`;
1{::.
>...
~'
~~.
P-
20 HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances uato the said Grantee ,
her hears and assigns forever. And the said Grantors do hereby covenant to said
with the said Grantee ,that they are the owners in fee s•:mple of said premises; that they are free
from all ineumbrances etcept: Sabject to iii ttistin
carentnts, sooina ocdinanres, and applicable buildiaq codes, li s ind tegnlitionsions, easerents, tights of raT, protective
and that they tvill warrant and defend the same from lxl; Iav-fuI claims whatsoever,
Da vine 29, 1990
n M. Bats
LaRee L. Bats
STATE OF IDAXO, COUNTY OF ili~isol
Un this 29th ~y of JOIE , 19 SO ,
before me, a notary public in and for said state, personally
appetsed
EasaaE~b''yE~•rin: •s;
y.• ~ nTC.n. ~i
s:rst<W1sioTxfe t pg i}# p4s3"eas ,whose names are
s•~sc~to~e~yi~rty,~"~ jnstrgmeat, and acknowledged to
met6~6 `~ ~.! p ~tlby:,~j,' : executed the same.
y Pcblie
Nato
Sta+s ofldaho )
Coontyofbfadi,on, J SS h'~~'Z~f:
1 krrr{ry,,~, ~~FArtjEy~ef s++}yt,y,jf.~ 'thin ]n,trumant was
Iliad aJUfu k J ,b?.1y1, w,
19 at °~'°~ f7 hi., and
raeordad on film ~ ~ ~ ~ ~R
Frr ~,~~-
bY M~IE 8. HOO?~5, Reeordar y
Deputy
At tha /syua# of
M >~ fiti",~ ;may ~(~„
~''~r~ -
3,
~ -:,
a::
` ,.
y~
3
a
0
p •
j e ~.
~'~~~.
February 3, 2005
To: City of Rexburg Planning and Zoning Board
~t~l~UU~Gr
FEB - 32005 ~~
CITY OF REXBUR
Regarding: Amendment to the comprehensive plan of properties owned by this group in
the area of Second East and Main Street.
Dear Friends,
We request that the eight properties listed in the attached descriptions, owned jointly or
individually by this group collectively, be restored on the comprehensive plan to their
previous commercial status.
The change in designation was unwise and unwarranted it was made without our
approval or notification. The City Council was aware from both previous written
(Arnold), and City Council appearance (Dr Lovell) of the owners intent to change these
properties from their residential useage before any hearings on comprehensive plan were
begun and these intents should have been respected.
We request that these changes be made immediately to accommodate our business and
parking needs in the area, and/or ability to resell the properties.
The more familiar addresses of the properties involved, and owners are as follows:
206 East Main -Arnold
228 East Main - Dr Lofgran and Lovell
232 East Main - Dr Lovell
35 South 2nd East- Dr Lofgran and Lovell
29 South 2nd East - Dr Lovell
45 South 2nd East - Dr Smith
55 South 2nd East(back 1/3 of lot which is already in commercial use) - Dr Smith
219 East lst South- Dr Smith
Sincerely,
Terrell and Margaret Arnold
Dr. Robert Lofgran
Dr. Gary Lovell
Dr Doug Smith
Ma r. 11. 2005 12 : 41 PM
~,.
tr e
CITY OF
~~~U~
AMERICAS FAMA.Y COMMUNITY
No. 0518 P. 2
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applit~tion
Submittal Requlrernents
Complete thk appltcatlon, provkle aN supporting documents, and submit to the Community Oeuefopment
Departmelrt. MAP CHANGE REQUESTS YYfLL BE PROCESSED IN CONIUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER REQUESTS AT
THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY FOI.l.01MNG THiS SUgIN11TAL. THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE ACflON BEFORE
THIS TIME NV THE EVENT THE CHANGE 1S TIME SENSRNE OR R HAS BEEN AT LEAST 8 MONTHS SINCE THE
LASTAMMENDMENT DATE. TEXTAMMENDMENTg MAY BE PROCESSED ON AN ONGOING BASIS AND DO NOT
NEED TO WAR SUC MONTHS BEt11VEEN REVISIONS.
Name_=,~ 1 L '~ ®Al Phone: ~3 ~ - ~Sz - ~~~~
J~2A~ pi..e.~' 1C• G 12U ~ l2
Address:
1. Does the amendment request(s) concern a spedflc property? YES„ NO
2. Is this amendment request far a change In land use designation? ~ NO
S. Are you the owner qr authorized argent Of the properly? YES= NO-
4. Provide a description or a map pf the area that this application affects.
6. Provide a reFerance to the section(s) of the Comprehenshre Plan that you propose to amend,
Mciuding the page•If applicable (i.e., Oomp Plan, Page loc, Une jai).
6. Provide proposed amendatory langr:age. Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary.
T. Explain the re>tson(s) for this amendment proposal.
Application Year Application Number Fee Required: Y N_
Amount: S
Ma r. 11. 2005 12 , 41 PM No. 0518 P. 3
$; ~ Please describe how your proposed amendment meets the followln$ selection criteria. Use a
' separate sheet(s) If necessary: ~ ~ ~ '
a. Was this proposed amendment dented during a previous Comprehensive Plan review
cycle:
Yes No . If Yes, briefly aupiain why (if knownk
.. ~.
b. Explain how the amendment advances the goals and policies of the Comprohensive
Plan:
c. What are the cumulative effects of this proposed amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan: ~ n
.. .~ ` h
G C
Property Owners Authorised Agent: ff you are the~property owner's.agenf, you are required to
provide a notarised letter from the property owner authorising submittal of this application.
1 hereby certify that 1 have read and examined this application and know the same to be a true
under ~penaltYof~perJury by the Laws of the State of Idaho wind ~am authorized to mane this
applioatton as the agent of the property owner..
Agent's'Slpflature: _ Date• .
Print Nanu• ~ ~ ~ ~ Phone:
Application Y®ar AppHcatlon Number ~ Fee Required: Y_ N_
.~ Amount: $
,- d~
~.
r +
r +~
GTY OF
RExBUR~
AMERICA'S FAMILY COMMUNITY
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
Submittal Requirements
Complete this application, provide all supporting documents, and submit to the Community Development
Department. MAP CHANGE REQUESTS WILL BE PROCESSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER REQUESTS AT
THE BEGINNING OF JANUARY FOLLOWING THIS SUBMITTAL. THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE ACTION BEFORE
THIS TIME IN THE EVENT THE CHANGE IS TIME SENSITIVE OR IT HAS BEEN AT LEAST 6 MONTHS SINCE THE
LAST AMMENDMENT DATE. TEXT AMMENDMENTS MAYBE PROCESSED ON AN ONGOING BASIS AND DO NOT
NEED TO WAIT SIX MONTHS BETWEEN REVISIONS.
c~P ~ yor- z~~-~~a~
Name:~7~~tirL'1P f ./~~i.%~~i°l'~~~~1' Phone:ra3s ~6N~f-~?Z3~
Address: l;Z.~ l E• Cv,~n-t4r CLu,~ Ur. //'~~y~x_~ ~4 T.~ h' 1~7y/
1. Does the amendment request(s) concern a specific property? YF~ C NO
2. Is this amendment request for a change in land use designation? YF.S,~ NO
3. Are you the oHrner or authorized agent of the property? YES NO
4. Provide a description or a map of the area that this application affects.
N~~,S~e;,( rxv~'u
5. Provide a reference to the section(s) of the Comprehensive Plan that you propose to amend,
including the page-if applicable (i.e., Comp Plan, Page xX, Line xX).
of l11/XP~ ASP
6. Provide proposed amendatory language. Attach separate sheet(s) if necessary.
S'PP /~i,~c~Esrl,~u n'1 Z
7. Explain the reason(s) for this amendment proposal.
S~F h/dc~~'v~c~u ~n 1
Application Year ~~~' H Application Number Fee Required: Y_ N_
Amount: $
8. Please describe how your proposed amendment meets the following selection criteria. Use a
separate sheet(s) if necessary:
a. Was this proposed amendment denied during a previous Comprehensive Plan review
cycle:
Yes~_No If Yes, briefly explain
b. Explain how the amendment advances the goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan:
S ~ P f~i.°ivr ~~rci'12 1
c. What are the cumulative effects of this proposed amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan:
Signature
Date
Property Owners Authorized Agent: If you are the property owner's agent, you are required to
provide a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing submittal of this application.
I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be a true
under penalty of perjury by the Laws of the State of Idaho and am authorized to make this
application as the agent of the property owner.
Agent's Signature: Date:
Print Name: Phone:
Application Year Application Number Fee Required: Y_ N_
Amount: $
~ ~l~~~d u n2 1
..
To: Community Development Dept.
From: Bonnie and Gary Anderson
Subject: Approx. 1.7 acres of vacant land bordered on the west by 2nd East
and on the " Eby Harvard Ave.
To whom it may concern:
This property has been in our family for four generations. The original
owners, my great grand parents, built duplexes, triplexes and single family
units on this land. My grandparents added a warehouse on the west end and
ran a commercial honey business. It is our desire that this land continue to
meet the needs of the neighborhood and community at large.
We have spent many hours talking with neighbors and professionals within
the community. We wanted to know what the current use needs are for this
land that is largely vacant. The following is what we found through our
research.
1. Residential 1 zoning is poor use of this land.
(a) This block has old houses and the addition of new construction
would look out of place
(b) The high traffic volume (15,000 cars per day) on 2nd East
makes it dangerous for families to back out onto the street.
2. BYU Idaho has doubled in size in two years. Now there are a
substantial number of students staying year around, many are
married and having children. This has placed a significant strain
on the hospital and medical staff. The hospital desperately needs
to expand and more doctors are needed in specialty areas.
3. "PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACE is critically needed".
We heard this over and over during our research. Professional
offices, a small day surgery center are two of the recommended
needs in Rexburg. We have land in an ideal location, close
to the hospital, to meet these two critical needs.
If there were professional office buildings available on our land many people
could walk to their appointments. This would help ease the traffic on 2nd
East. An entrance on Harvard Ave. could also be used effectively.
It is clear to us that a rezone to MIXED USE is in the best interest of
neighbors and the Rexburg community at large.
I concur with the Andersons recommendation to rezone the property to
MIXED USE.
. ,,Madison County /City of Rexburg GIS
Page 1 of 1
1~c~'JrHr~u~ ,;L -
W ~.
~ ~.
f'1
l~
-~
~ ~
~ ~
~
i
- i a-~r0[?J[n ~;
R] ~
i ~
Cll e~ j
~~ 2
.p
(T ~ ~
~y ~
~ Ca
~i
~
(
7 ~
7.i 76 ~
....~{
~~ n~
r
~ ~ ~ n
Al f° ?
p
V
f. # i ~ t
~
~
j
p
~
S
I
1! '. _ ~
_
C f!1
}S
~~~
ry
71 2 t
~
~ ~ ~ ~
i n t___..__,..-_-__
""yy
~ ~
Ul ~ ~
~ yamy,
U1 Z1 `: u i
r ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~. ~ W i
~ ,
~ 47 L
g ~.
A O 1
~
Of
A I
G'
~= I E r w
~ ~
~~~ ~ I ~ ~
-y
U _ _ . ~ _ ~._ _ ,. _ R, _._,... -~_
~ ~ ._.~._.d~,._, •w
~ ~ ~ C i
~ _
~. ~
s
~~ ~ a ~ ~_ s
,y
~~
G ~ ~ ~
L ~ ~ }S ~
c n z ~~ •
~ x __ .. ~~
~ PJ K !'
CJ [ IM r .a s ~ 1 " ~' ~ ...t
~ ~ ; I
2
g ~ f
V ~ j
(A ~ y ' ~ G
i
~ ~
~~
~~~
____. r r. ~l ~'
Xl ~ ~ ~ f9
A 1 ~ z ~ 4
~ !
G7
§ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~~ ~+
Cif n ~ ' ~ '.,. Y
p ~ (n
• -1 2 I
:G b ~ i t i
~ ~
~ ~~ i
c ?~ f ~ c
ttT ~
h? ~ -G
L
~~ ~ k
.. _ ~. - -
_:~ ~ _
-- -- _
~ y~y~~~a~i
$~~ Z
~Mm
~ e ~ ~
ti ~~
W r _ - ~,
~, ~ ~
_ _..
' C L
~t* ~ o
~ ~
n ~ ~ zl
1 ~
~.~ [~ ~! OS p~
i~ i i
http://agentsmith/website/precincts/presentation compass/print.asp 11 /23/2004
o
~~ ~
,~
CITY OF
R~xBUR~
AMERK_A5 FAMILY COMMUNITY
' •
19 E. Main (PO Box 280) Phone: 208-359-3020 x326
Rexburg, Idaho 83440 Fax: 208-359-3024
www.rexbura.org cathywC4D,ci.rexburg.id.us
Facts of Finding
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments
1. On May 25, 2005, Willard Price presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Secretary a Request and
Application for aRezone/Annexation and change in the Comprehensive Plan Map (Refer to the
Proposed City of Rexburg Comprehensive Plan Amendments OS-00163 Area # 1).
2. On May 25, 2005, Dean Grover presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Secretary a Request and
Application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map (Refer to the Proposed City of Rexburg
Comprehensive Plan Amendments OS-00163 Area #2).
3. On May 25, 2005, Carlon Scott presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Secretary a Request and
Application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map (Refer to the Proposed City of Rexburg
Comprehensive Plan Amendments OS-00163 Area #3).
4. On May 25, 2005, Bonnie J. Anderson presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning Secretary a Request
and Application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map (Refer to the Proposed City of Rexburg
Comprehensive Plan Amendments OS-00163 Area #4).
5. One June 9, 2005, the City Clerk sent the Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the local
newspaper for June 18, 2005 and July 2, 2005. A notice was posted on the property and sent to all
property owners within 300 feet of the above mentioned property.
6. On July 7, 2005, the four areas in question were presented to the Rexburg Planning & Zoning
Commission.
Area # 1: Comment was made that the applicant of Area # 1 withdrew the application for the
Rezone/Annexation the previous day but requested to continue on with the request for the
Comprehensive Plan Map Change. Chairman Dyer said that they would still process both requests.
Commissioners felt that Commercial was not growing out there yet; therefore, David Stein moved to
recommend to City Council denying the request for a Comprehensive Plan Map change for segment
Number One (1). Mike Ricks seconded the motion. None Opposed. Motion carried. Because Area
#1 was not adjacent to the Rexburg City limits, David Stein moved to recommend to City Council
denying the annexation/rezone request for the particular parcel. Mike Ricks seconded the motion.
None opposed. Motion carried.
Area #2: Most of the comments from the public were their concerns for protecting the adjacent
Stonebridge Subdivision. Due to the ability of the Commission to require a buffer or other conditions
that would protect the neighborhood if the applicant did propose to rezone in the future, Thaine
Robinson moved to recommend to City Council changing " 2a" from Multi-Family to Single-Family and
" 2b" from Multi-Family to Commercial. Ted Hill seconded the motion. None opposed. Motion
carried.
Area #3: There was much input from the public regarding the conservation of their historic
neighborhood. David Stein suggested that they have a Project Redevelopment Option, which would not
require a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map. David Stein moved that they recommend to City
Council denying the change to the Comprehensive Plan Map for area three (3) from residential to mixed
use, but strongly encourage the Neighborhood Association and property owners requesting development
to get together and use the Project Redevelopment Option. Thaine Robinson seconded the motion.
David Stein, Thaine Robinson, and Joseph Laird were in favor of the motion. Chairman Dyer, Ted
Hill and Mike Ricks were not in favor of the motion. Motion did not carry. Mike Ricks moved to
recommend to City Council that they do have the Mixed Use Zone change on the Comprehensive Plan
Map on that particular area. Ted Hill seconded the motion. Chairman Dyer, Ted Hill and Mike Ricks
were in favor of the motion. David Stein, Thaine Robinson, and Joseph Laird were not in favor of
the motion. Motion did not carry. Thaine Robinson moved to recommend to City Council tabling it
for further discussion. Joseph Laird seconded the motion. None opposed. Motion carried.
Area #4: The Commissioners felt that this was a slightly different case than Area #3 due to the fact that
it was set further in towards the neighborhood. There was, again, much input from the public regarding
the conservation of their historic neighborhood. The public felt that the Mixed Use Zone was too broad.
They do not want a Neighborhood Business District or restaurants put in their neighborhood. They
wouldn't mind seeing small patio homes built in the empty lot of the applicant's property. Some agreed
that the Project Redevelopment Option would be a good idea to implement. David Stein moved that
they recommend to City Council denying the application for the Comprehensive Plan Map change for
Area Four (4}. Thaine Robinson seconded the motion. David Stein amended his motion to encourage
having a PRO zone. Thaine Robinson seconded the amended motion. None opposed. Motion
carried.
7. On August 17~, 2005 the four areas in question were presented to the Rexburg City Council. After a
comprehensive discussion of the four areas the city council was concerned with the originators of the
request making proposals without definite plans for development. Area One and Area Two were turned
down due to a lack of development plans. Area Three and Area Four were turned down because the
City Council anticipated development in this area coming under existing zoning laws, namely with a
Project Redevelopment Option. (PRO-Zone)
Area # 1
Council Member Erickson reviewed the Planning and Zoning decision to deny Area One because it is
being used far agriculture. There is no commercial development planned at this time.
Council Member Erickson moved to deny the request to change the land use designation for Area One
from agricultural to commercial; Council Member Pugmire seconded the motion;
Council Member Benfield moved a substitute motion not following the recommendations of Planning
and Zoning and to change the land use designation along the 2nd East corridor to commercial (one block
on the east side of 2nd East) and light industrial by extending the current land use designations from the
City out to Hwy Z0; no second was given, so the motion failed.
Mayor Larsen asked the Council to consider the original motion by Council Member Erickson.
s~
Those voting aye were Council Members Young, Erickson, and Anderson. Those voting nay were
Council Members Pugmire and Benfield. The motion carried by a vote of three to two.
Area #2
Mayor Larsen indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this
proposal. It is the Dean Grover property.
Council Member Young moved to approve 2A and deny 2B; Council Member Anderson seconded the
motion; Discussion on the request being one or two requests. P&Z Administrator Hibbert indicated that
applicant would withdraw the request if they were not approved together. They were presented as one
proposal in Planning and Zoning. Council Member Young withdrew his motion with the consent of
Council Member Anderson.
Council Member Young moved to deny the request to re-designate Area Two (2A and 2B); Council
Member Erickson seconded the motion; all voted aye, none opposed.
The motion carried.
Area #3
Council Member Pugmire moved to deny the land use changes in Area Three; no second was given.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Council Member Erickson moved to change the land use from (low to medium) residential density to
mixed use in Area Three; no second was given. The motion died for lack of a second.
Discussion from the Council concerning making a second motion similar to Council Member Pugmire's
motion that died for lack of a second.
Council Member Pugmire moved to deny the request for a land use designation change for Area Three
and to have the Council instruct the Mayor to form a reasonably small citizens group to come up with a
proposal for future action by the Council; Council Member Young seconded the motion.
Council Member Pugmire amended his motion to include three voting members on each side of the
proposal plus a non voting member (Mayor or Council) with staff support; Council Member Young
concurred and he second the amended motion; all voted aye, none opposed.
The motion carried.
Area #4
Mayor Larsen reviewed a letter concerning a proposal for a Re-development Zone in Area Four. He
did not see a reason to act on the request to change Area Four. A group of neighbors will submit a Re-
Development Plan for Area Four. Council Member Pugmire asked if his motion on Area Three would
be applicable to Area Four.
Council Member Pugmire moved to deny the request to change the land use designation for Area Four;
Council Member Anderson seconded the motion; all voted aye, none opposed.
The motion to deny carried.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
FOR THE CITY OF REXBURG
NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN that a Public Hearing will be held August 17`x, 2005,
at 7:40 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City Building at 12 North Center, Rexburg, Idaho, before
the City Council of the City of Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, to consider amending the current
Comprehensive Plan Map as shown on the attached map. The areas for the proposed changes are
described below including the associated legal descriptions for each area.
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E, Boise
Meridian of Madison County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025.14 feet to the North Rexburg
interchange and following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32
feet, thence N 5.31'29" E a distance of 609.58 feet, thence N 5.32' 15" E a distance of 68 feet,
thence N 66.54'26" E a distance of 2,020.78 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a
radius of 6597.83 feet and an angle of 13.14'58" with an arc length of 1525.71, thence continuing
S 27.58' 16" E a distance of 1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S
30.8' 15" W a distance of 1539.48 feet, thence West a distance of 722.81 feet, thence S 1,236.95
feet, thence S 30. 7' 38" W a distance of 69.7 feet, thence S 89.31'20" W a distance of 2,595.45
feet to the point of beginning; excluding those properties located in the north half of section 8
Township 06 North Range 40 E, Boise Meridian of Madison County, Idaho Section 8.
2. (A) A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2
to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East, Boise Meridian
and continuing South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470
feet, and thence East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
2. (B) A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2
to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East Boise Meridian
and continuing to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet,
thence South 656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
It is proposed to review the current Comprehensive Plan Map and consider making amendments to
the Map as needed to reflect the community's vision for the growth of the community in the next 10 plus
years. As the community is experiencing substantial growth at this time, the community's vision for the
growth of the City needs to be reviewed.
At such Public Hearing the Rexburg City Council will hear all persons and all objections and
recommendations relative to the Comprehensive Plan Map revisions that will be proposed. This notice is
subject to the provisions of Section 67-6508, Idaho Code and all amendments thereof.
The City Council encourages all City residents to participate in the process to amend the
Comprehensive Plan Map. Citizen's comments maybe submitted in writing or by email during the fact
finding period to the City Clerk at City Hall located at 12 North Center Street, or the Planning and Zoning
Department located at 19 East Main Street prior to 4:00 p.m. on August 16~', 2005. All interested persons
are invited to offer their views and vision for the City of Rexburg for the next 10 plus years of
development.
DATED this 18`" day of July, 2005.
CITY OF REXBURG
~~4QO~r
~.o
Sj: ~~~... ...•~Do`~~o~ Blair D. Kay, City Clerk
,~
~'ii.,. lE C~ ...Q~~\
Published: July 20, 2005
August 13, 2005
-
(
'
~
i
I
-_ _ _
i ~ ~
Pt
r
l ~`
S
P___
j
~
i i
~
-
~
~"Tr~
L
rr
_r
____r ._
1- -- _ f,;
r~
r" i i
/~ ~
i _
_-
,
J
`- i
r /
-
a~ ~ t
.
'`- ~~ ~
.. ,i''
,. p
~~, ~ i~ ~~ rr Mi I • • -~ -
i1
'__~ ~
J~ I
J ; .r,
~i. ;
%
~rt
%
~~
_ sir. ~
~' ~
r r
f +,
l;
j
E
_ ~ , . '
i
_-
_
r
~
- _
,, ~
I, _ . ,,
; ~ .
'
~_
I =
r
l f~
; +f _
i 1,
err/ ~ I .,
-.
I ;,,f ~
.
`~
hll.~,:a
2a : _
- - -
r T
^ T
~
I ~- -'
~
' ~ ~
~ _ t
~
~
~ .. - 9
__ . _
,;
_
/';~
2b
~
s
. _
' ~'
`
-
~
' , {~
--
,
r
1 f ( ' ,
~ r , .-;
_
-
-
,
~~ "' ~'T~Ci. _ I `~~ M
I
f
d
: ~
;
i 1~
r ' ~,
-, _ _
± ~ 3 ~ ~ _
4 ~ Irv: ` ' ~ ~>,:
~ _ _
4 ,
~~~
r ~
~:'~l
.:~' _
- E. ~ ~7 v
0 #1 Agriculture and Industrialto Commercial ~ _ #3 Residential 1 to Moved Use
#2a Residential 2 to Residential 1 '..__.. _j ~ Residential 1 to Moved Use
n #2fJ Residential 2 to Corrmercial ~
~A.s~ritt ~~t3Ul~s PRQPQSED CITY QF REXBLIRQ re
~~ -...°.:~I,~' CQMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANIMENDIvIEI~iTS 05-00163
~-^. .
'/
;mac `5 V'Y'~~ / i'r~ ~ v ~ r
~y
S
/ /1 G~S'
~~:~=~-~
~~ ~~~ ~~
g~ ~ fa
~j ,~
/ J
r-~
__ _
~ s~~
~. ~k/ _
', __
-~ r~1~~ BC St~ancbreid~c,1..~.C
y 563 West 500 South, Suite 400
Bountiful, UT 84090
Tel: (801) 284-4443
Fax: (801) 294-0497
July 7, 2005
City Council Members and Mayor
Rexburg City
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
Dear City Council Members and Mayor,
BC Stonebridge, LLC is the developer of the Stonebridge residential community located on 1000
North in the City of Rexburg, Idaho.
A few days ago we discovered that a public hearing was being held on the evening of July 7,
2005 to discuss changing the Comprehensive Plan of the City to allow Commercial Zoning of
property that borders the Stonebridge Subdivision to the west.
BC Stonebridge, LLC did not receive notice of this action. As an owner of immediately adjacent
property, a changing of the Comprehensive Plan could impact our property significantly.
Although we do not know the specific intent for the change to the Comprehensive Plan, we do
have two general concerns:
1. This action would potentially allow the construction of very large commercial and/or
industrial buildings in close proximity to the Stonebridge Subdivision eliminating any
buffer zone between the commercial zoning and the residential zoning. This could be
very detrimental to the residential subdivision.
2. This action would potentially allow the construction of very large commercial and/or
industrial buildings in close proximity to 1000 North Street. Lining this street with
commercial structures would again be detrimental to the residential subdivision.
Without knowing the specific intent for changing the Comprehensive Plan in this way, it is
impossible for us to evaluate the impact it will have on the Stonebridge Subdivision.
We would respectively ask the Council to table this issue until the adjacent property owners can
be better informed as to the reasons for changing the Comprehensive Plan and the anticipated
plans for the development of the property.
Without this information we have no choice but to voice our opposition to the proposed change in
the Comprehensive Plan.
Sincerely,
~~
Brett W. Hastings
Principal
BC Stonebridge Properties, LLC
TO: Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Home and Property Owners on Harvard Ave. South 2"d East,
East 2"d South, and East 1St South.
SUBJECT: Gary and Bonnie Anderson Re-Zoning Proposal
As a community of neighbors living next to the 1.7 acres of vacant land owned by Gary
and Bonnie Anderson we would like to support Anderson's in their goal to develop this
long vacant property. However, we believe their proposal for professional/medical
offices presents only one option to the development of the neighborhood at lazge and we
believe other options and variations should also be considered.
We suggest that the block under consideration is larger than Anderson's 1.7 acres and the
re-zoning has an effect on many people and the homes in which they reside. As a
community of neighbors collectively owning twice as much of the block as Andersons, it
is our suggestion that the block be re-zoned from Low Density Residential 2 (LDR 2) to
Mixed Use with the following zoning restrictions which aze more likely to protect our
property values as allowed under the Project Redevelopment Option:
1. NO NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT. That means NO
convenience stores, bakeries, doughnut shops, drug stores, florists, barber
shops, dry cleaners, etc. as allowed under a typical Mixed Use "Neighborhood
Business District".
2. NO restaurants, pharmacies, second hand stores, photography studios,
mortuaries, wedding chapels or reception centers as currently allowed under
the Professional Office zoning.
3. CREATE A PROJECT REDEVELOPMENT ZONE. It is suggested that
this block be allowed to be redeveloped with a density somewhere between
LDR2 and LDR3 into a relatively high end patio home/condominium
community with a specified overall green space and controlled access
avoiding South 2"d East. This redevelopment zone could be targeted at
seniors, "empty nesters", and other individuals who desire a nice home with
little upkeep and simplified living close to the BYU-Idaho campus,
downtown, and near to professional services. It is strongly recommended that
this redevelopment NOT be targeted as low end or typical student housing.
We believe this option better meets the needs of our neighborhood and would be a nice
residential addition to the City of Rexburg. It would promote downtown business and
professional office patronage.
We believe that there is a need for this type of neighborhood housing in Rexburg which is
currently unmet. As the community and the University grow, the options for faculty
housing and retirement housing need to expand. This is ideal property for this type of
development.
We believe that there is already an overabundance of Mixed Use zoning in Rexburg that
is undeveloped and/or underdeveloped. There is no need to create additional
"unfinished" zoning. of this type in this town.
With the number of empty professional offices available in Rexburg and the expansion of
the hospital to include additional professional office space, there is little or no apparent
need to allow this property to be set aside for even more professional office space.
'Thank you for considering our proposal and recommendations to make Rexburg a better
place to live and work.
1. Ralph M. Kern -158 Harvard Ave.
~~~
.~.~.
2. James Smith -123 Harvard Ave.
3. Boyd Weatherston -Harvard Ave.
4. Steve Herti - South 2nd East
a~"
~~
5. Jerome Barrick -South 2nd East
6. Doris Groot -East 1St South
7. Sid Muir -East 1St South
8. Jack Harrell -East 1St South
9. Doralee Gambles -East 1St South
10. Sandra Thomason -South 2nd East
11. Taylor -East 2nd South
• ~~}'
try
~1
~~
2~ -
u
12. Scott Samuelson -East 2nd South
13. Messer -East 2"d South
14. Tom Thornton -East 2°d South
15. Darracq -East 2°d South
Response to Planning and Zoning Commission by Robert and Kathleen Nelson
Residing at 52 Ash Avenue, Rexburg
As members of the cast ivlain i~`eighborhood Association we add our views to those of
the other members of the Association requesting that Planning and Zoning Commission
members reject the request of those who would change the character of our area by
making the publicized changes to the Comprehensive Plan for the city labeled 1,2, 3
and 4.
W e agree wiih neighbors in ibis area who oppose the multi-use zoning approach to the
above indicated parcels of property. While we do see that doctors in Professional Plaza
have aiiempied to make Their offices attractive, and pleasant, the outcome of Their
construction has caused traffic congestion along Ash Avenue, bringing a ten to twenty
fold increase in irafiic. At certain limes of the day, it is not safe to back out of our
driveway in order to go anywhere. Anyone who ventures out onto the street on foot,
for any reason, is in immediate danger. Speed limits are not obeyed consistently either.
Add to this the amount of traffic coming downhill on Maple Drive and safety is a real
concern, even given the fact That a Sheriff's deputy Lives on the corner of i~irch and
Maple.
~v1y wife and I both support the resolutions passed in the neighborhood association
tonight, Tuesday, July 5`b. .Those expressions of the feelings of our neighbors are
important and valid and they need to be strongly recognized.
W e do recognize that some changes are inevitable, but we insist that a Thoughtful
approach is needed.
Respectfully,
Robert and Kathleen Nelson
Page 1 of 2
Bethany Cau~eld
From: Harris, Ann Marie [HARRISA@byui.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:31 PM
To: Bethany Caufield
Subject: Letter for Planning and Zoning Commission
July 6, 2005
Dear Commission Members,
I have grave concerns about some proposals being made to rezone the areas between Main Street and 2"d South
on 2"d East. My home is at 152 S. 2"d E. and my property would be adversely affected by such changes.
First of all, this is my home. I bought my home in a residential area and hoped to grow old here. The thought of a
video store across the street from my home is not a pleasant one.
Second, as the traffic on 2"d East increases, the idea of bringing businesses to an area already congested seems
foolish at best. Before the stop sign at 1St South was removed, the traffic was at least slowed. Now folks race
from Main Street up to 2"d South without much care for the 25 mile per hour speed limit. I can only see more of a
mess with traffic going up the hill, business traffic trying to pull in and out of parking lots (perish the thought), and
residents trying to back out of driveways.
Third, mixed use and residential zones should not be mixed. I stand to suffer materially when the value of my
house goes down due to some bakery or florist shop or convenience store across the street. I like my little house
and I can't afford another one like it. As a single mom, I just don't have the money to buy a comparable home in
Rexburg.
What would I like to see? First, put a stop sign back at the intersection of 1St South and 2"d East and slow the
traffic down. Second, as a neighborhood we are all mortified by the vacant lot on 2"d East owned by Mrs.
Anderson. That blue tarp monstrosity, the burned out home, the weeds and the trash are an eyesore and a blight
on our neighborhood and Rexburg in general. Why she is not fined for negligence I do not understand.
Nevertheless, I would like to see something wholesome done with that land. My first choice would be single
family homes. An alternative would be a community of garden or patio homes with small lawns and green spaces
for retirees or professors. Not apartments, not townhouses, but patio homes with an entrance from Harvard. I
emphatically do not want student housing there or mixed use business. I don't think we need more doctor's
offices. There are plenty of vacant offices now and the hospital plans include doctor's offices as I understand it.
The parking problems attending doctor's offices are nightmarish.
I would like to see the homes on Main Street and 2"d East down to 1St South remain single family homes. The
homes are just lovely and provide an attractive entrance into the residential area. The lots are too small to make
useful parking lots in the back so what would we get then but parking problems like the ones in Professional Plaza
except that they would happen at an intersection. City ordinances about issues in Professional Plaza have been
repeatedly ignored and the area is congested and ripe for accidents. Why should we believe that doctor's offices
in the area at 2"d East and Main would be any different? I see a parking and traffic nightmare right there at a
busy intersection.
I appreciate the opportunity to voice my opinions and feelings. I also appreciate your attention and consideration
of these issues in your decision making.
Thank you sincerely,
Ann Marie Harris
152 S 2"d E
7/6/2005
Page 2 of 2
Rexburg, ID 83440
208-356-8936
7/6/2005
l~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
FOR THE CITY OF REXBURG
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held July 07, 2005,
at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City Building at 12 North Center, Rexburg, Idaho,
before the Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, to
consider amending the current Comprehensive Plan Map as shown on the attached map. The areas for the
proposed changes are described below including the associated legal descriptions for each area.
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E of Madison
County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025.14 feet to the North Rexburg interchange and
following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N
5.31'29" E a distance of 609.58 feet, thence N 5.32' 15" E a distance of 68 feet, thence N
66.54'26" E a distance of 2,020.78 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of
6597.83 feet and an angle of 13.14'58"with an arc length of 1525.71, thence continuing S
27.58' 16" E a distance of 1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S
30.8' 15" W a distance of 1539.48 feet, thence West a distance of 722.81 feet, thence S 1,236.95
feet, thence S 30. 7' 38" W a distance of 69.7 feet, thence S 89.31'20" W a distance of 2,595.45
feet to the point of beginning.
2. (A) A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2
to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along-the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470 feet, and thence
East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
2. (B) A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2
to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet, thence South
656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
~'
.j
• Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
It is proposed to review the current Comprehensive Plan Map and consider making amendments
to the Map as needed to reflect the community's vision for the growth of the community in the next 10
plus years. As the community is experiencing substantial growth at this time, the community's vision for
the growth of the City needs to be reviewed.
At such Public Hearing the Rexburg. Planning and Zoning Commission will hear all persons and
all objections and recommendations relative to the Comprehensive Plan Map revisions that will be
proposed. This notice is subject to the provisions of Section 67-6508, Idaho Code and all amendments
thereof.
The Planning and Zoning Commission encourages all City residents to participate in the process to
amend the Comprehensive Plan Map. Citizen's comments maybe submitted in writing or by email during
the fact finding period to the City Clerk at City Hall located at 12 North Center Street, or the Planning and
Zoning Department located at 19 East Main Street prior to 4;00 p.m. on July 06, 2005. All interested
persons are invited to offer their views and vision for the City of Rexburg for the next 10 plus years of
development.
DATED this 09th day of June, 2005.
CITY OF REXBURG
~ _~, ~~
Blair D. Kay, City Clerk
Published: June 14, 2005
July 02, 2005
~e C[TY OF
y REXBLIR~ ~, _ _
`~+i4~,~ AMFRIGA'S FAMILY COMMUNITY 19 E. Main (PO Box 280)
Rexburg, Idaho 83440
uvww.rexburg.org
Phone: 208 359-3020 x326
Fax: 208-359-3024
comdev(a2 rexbu rg. o rg
Affidavit of Legal Interest
State of Idaho
Councty of IMadison4
Name Address
2 ~Ci aVIO
City State
Being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and say:
(If Applicant is also Owner of Record, skip to B)
A. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my
permission to: ~> ~' L~i~~c~ ~'~-~=~ _ ~, {'~ ~ ~~UGf iU ~~. S~
Name Address
to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property.
B. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold Rexburg City and its employees harmless from any
claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herin or as to
the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application.
Dated this ~~~~ day of ~ , 20 b~
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me the day and year first above written.
NpTAq
...,-
,~, ~ ;
-~~,~ ~ ;
Notary Public of Idaho
~ L
PUBLIC
'~...._.....r''', j,0
ri;;~OF ~ ~pr~~
I 1
Residing at: ~=~ [Z ~~ ~~1L C~ 1.~ (~~ l.~ l ~ ~"~i
My commission expires: ` (~ z z-~ ~ (~ i
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E of Madison
County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025.14 feet to the North Rexburg interchange and
following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N
5.31'29" E a distance of 609.58 feet, thence N 5.32' 15" E a distance of 68 feet, thence N
66.54'26" E a distance of 2,020.78 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of
6597.83 feet and an angle of 13.14'58" with an arc length of 1525.71, thence continuing S
27.58' 16" E a distance of 1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S
30.8' 15" W a distance of 1539.48 feet, thence West a distance of 722.81 feet, thence S 1,236.95
feet, thence S 30. 7' 38" W a distance of 69.7 feet, thence S 89.31'20" W a distance of 2,595.45
feet to the point of beginning.
2. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470 feet, and thence
East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
-A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet, thence South
656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
• Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
• Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
A request for zone change from multiple zones to RBC for the following
described area. Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06
North Range 40 E of Madison County, Idaho, thence continuing 2,025 feet to the
North Rexburg interchange and following the Highway 33 right-of--way the
following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N 5-31-29 E a distance of 609.6
feet, thence N 5-322-15 E a distance of 68 feet, thence N 66-54-26 E a distance of
2,026.9 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 7000 feet and
an angle of 12-25-44 with an arc length of 1518.45, thence continuing S 27-58-16
E a distance of 1807.7 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S 30-
8-11 W adistance of 3,038.57 feet, thence West a distance of 2,597.3 feet to the
point of beginning.
2. Tract 1. A request for zone change from Multi Family to Commercial described
as commencing from the
Tract 1. A request for zone change from Residential 1 to Mixed Use described as
commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 398 feet, thence South
135 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 30 feet, an arc
length of 47.124 feet and a delta of 90-0-6, thence continuing West a distance of
136.25 feet, thence South a distance of 365 feet, thence East 1.25 feet, thence
South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence 236 feet West to
the point of beginning.
Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby
subdivision and thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West
adistance of 82.5 feet, thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5
feet, thence South 14.5 feet, thence West to the Right of Way known as
Professional plaza a distance of 56 feet, thence North 173 feet to the point of
beginning.
4. A request for zone change from Residential 1 to Mixed Use described as
commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision
thence continuing East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the
East a distance of 5 feet, thence North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence
North a distance of 132 feet, thence West to the point of beginning a distance of
310.75 feet.
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E of Madison
County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025 feet to the North Rexburg interchange and
following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N 5-
31-29 E adistance of 609.6 feet, thence N 5-32-15 E a distance of 68 feet, thence N 66-54-26 E a
distance of 2,026.9 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 7000 feet and an
angle of 12-25-44 with an arc length of 1518.45, thence continuing S 27-58-16 E a distance of
1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S 30-8-11 W a distance of 3,038.57
feet, thence South 89-44-22 West a distance of 2,605.63 feet to the point of beginning.
2. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470 feet, and thence
East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
-A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1;726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet, thence South
656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
• Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
• Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
FOR THE CITY OF REXBURG
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held July 07, 2005,
at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City Building at 12 North Center, Rexburg, Idaho, before
the Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Rexburg, Madison County, Idaho, to
consider amending the current Comprehensive Plan Map as shown on the attached map. The areas for the
proposed changes are described below including the associated legal descriptions for each area.
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E of Madison
County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025.14 feet to the North Rexburg interchange and
following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N
5.31'29" E a distance of 609.58 feet, thence N 5.32' 15" E a distance of 68 feet, thence N
66.54'26" E a distance of 2,020.78 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of
6597.83 feet and an angle of 13.14'58" with an arc length of 1525.71, thence continuing S
27.58' 16" E a distance of 1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S 30.8' 15"
W a distance of 1539.48 feet, thence West a distance of 722.81 feet, thence S 1,236.95 feet, thence
S 30. 7' 38" W a distance of 69.7 feet, thence S 89.31'20" W a distance of 2,595.45 feet to the
point of beginning.
2. (A) A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2
to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470 feet, and thence
East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
2. (B) A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2
to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet, thence South
656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
• Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
~ Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
It is proposed to review the current Comprehensive Plan Map and consider making amendments to
the Map as needed to reflect the community's vision for the growth of the community in the next 10 plus
years. As the community is experiencing substantial growth at this time, the community's vision for the
growth of the City needs to be reviewed.
At such Public Hearing the Rexburg Planning and Zoning Commission will hear all persons and
all objections and recommendations relative to the Comprehensive Plan Map revisions that will be
proposed. This notice is subject to the provisions of Section 67-6508, Idaho Code and all amendments
thereof.
The Planning and Zoning Commission encourages all City residents to participate in the process to
amend the Comprehensive Plan Map. Citizen's comments maybe submitted in writing or by email during
the fact finding period to the City Clerk at City Hall located at 12 North Center Street, or the Planning and
Zoning Department located at 19 East Main Street prior to 4:00 p.m. on July 06, 2005. All interested
persons are invited to offer their views and vision for the City of Rexburg for the next 10 plus years of
development.
DATED this 09t'' day of June, 2005.
CITY OF REXBURG
Blair D. Kay, City Clerk
Published: June 14, 2005
July 02, 2005
1. A request for a change of land use for multiple properties currently zoned as Agriculture and
Industrial, to Commercial for the following described area.
Commencing at the South West corner of section 8 Township 06 North Range 40 E of Madison
County, Idaho, thence continuing North 2,025.14 feet to the North Rexburg interchange and
following the Highway 33 right-of--way the following 4 courses: thence East 32 feet, thence N
5.31'29" E a distance of 609.58 feet, thence N 5.32' 15" E a distance of 68 feet, thence N
66.54'26" E a distance of 2,020.78 feet to a point on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of
6597.83 feet and an angle of 13.14'58" with an arc length of 1525.71, thence continuing S
27.58' 16" E a distance of 1807.74 feet to the N Yellowstone Hwy right-of--way, thence S
30.8' 15" W a distance of 1539.48 feet, thence West a distance of 722.81 feet, thence S 1,236.95
feet, thence S 30. 7' 38" W a distance of 69.7 feet, thence S 89.31'20" W a distance of 2,595.45
feet to the point of beginning.
2. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Commercial.
• Tract 1. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
South a distance of 1,470 feet, thence West 406.75 feet, thence North 1,470 feet, and thence
East 406.75 feet to the point of beginning.
-A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 2 to Residential 1.
• Tract 2. Commencing at a point that is N 89.31'34" E 1,726.69 feet along the Section Line
from the Northwest Corner of Section 20 ,Township 6 North, Range 40 East and continuing
to the East a distance of 265 feet, thence North 656 feet, thence West 265 feet, thence South
656 feet to the point of beginning.
3. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described areas:
Tract 1. Commencing from the South West corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
continuing North a distance of 660 feet thence to the East 231.75 feet, thence South 530 feet
thence East 1.25 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence East 3 feet, thence South 65 feet, thence
236 feet West to the point of beginning.
• Tract 2. Also, commencing at the North East corner of Block 1 of the Rigby subdivision and
thence continuing South a distance of 165 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet,
thence North 6.5 feet, thence to the West a distance of 82.5 feet, thence North 158.5 feet, and
thence 165 feet to the point of beginning.
4. A request for change of land-use currently designated as Residential 1 to Mixed Use for the
following described area:
Commencing from the South West corner of Block 8 of the Rigby subdivision thence continuing
East a distance of 300 feet, thence North 132 feet, thence to the East a distance of 5 feet, thence
North 396 feet, thence East 5.75 feet, thence North a distance of 132 feet, thence West a distance
of 310.75 feet, thence 660 feet to the South to the point of beginning.
Madison County /City of Rexburg GIS
A
S
O
tS
Qt"
D
d
C
v
c
0
m
w
0
m
m
m
d
a
4
~i
d
O
7
W
Page 1 of 1
http://gis/intranet/arc ims/printable. aspx?MapURL=http://agentsmith/output/arcI M SAGE... 5/25 /2005
Madison County /City of Rexburg GIS
ti
i1
R
O
9
C
Op
N
~D
V1
a
m
n
d
m
4
m
d
o'
w
Page 1 of 1
http://gis/intranet/arcims/printable. aspx?MapU RL=http ://agentsmith/output/arcIMSAGE... 5/25/2005
__ 1
i
„_
Rd
~tzer ~~
No oWN~_ S . ~
E1stS
St
ly Sf
__J; #1 Agriculture and Industrial to Commercial ~ #3 Residential 1 to Mixed Use
I #2a Residential 2 to Residential 1 }~ ~ #4 Residential 1 to Mixed Use
#2b Residential 2 to Commercial
~b~ R~'~uRG PROPOSED CITY OF REXQURG
~ `~ _ ,~~e~~s COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMMENDMENTS 05-00163
w
M
N